Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

EchoForce: Continuous Grip Force Estimation from Skin Deformation Using Active Acoustic Sensing on a Wristband

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read EchoForce shows that a wristband can estimate continuous grip force from reflected ultrasound with EMG-level accuracy, including for new users and after remounting.

desk verdict A well-built acoustic wristband for grip force with an honest limitations section, but the headline numbers rest on a ground truth that linear interpolation likely smoothed—worth refereeing, needs an independent force reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20437 v1 pith:GDWIWWBH submitted 2025-07-27 cs.HC

Kian Mahmoodi , Yudong Xie , Tan Gemicioglu , Chi-Jung Lee , Jiwan Kim , Cheng Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords gripforceestimationactiveacousticsensingskindeformationwearablewristbandFMCWultrasoundcontinuousregressionuser-independentmodelhealthmonitoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes EchoForce, a wristband that measures continuous grip force by emitting inaudible ultrasound toward the forearm and analyzing the echoes reflected from the skin. The claim is that the subtle skin deformations caused by the finger flexor muscles carry enough information to estimate grip force with accuracy comparable to electromyography (EMG), but without the cost, setup expertise, or per-session recalibration EMG requires. In a study with 11 participants, the authors report a fine-tuned user-dependent mean error rate of 9.08% of each participant's maximum voluntary contraction, a user-dependent error of 10.10%, and a user-independent error of 12.29%, with accuracy maintained when the device is remounted and when the wrist is supinated, neutral, or pronated. If correct, this would make continuous grip force measurement practical for health monitoring, rehabilitation, and force-based interaction on ordinary wrist-worn devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is active acoustic sensing of skin deformation. The speaker emits frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) ultrasound in the 20–29 kHz range, and a microphone placed at 45 degrees to the skin captures reflected signals; the shape of the skin surface alters reflection delay, angle, and frequency. Consecutive FMCW frames are cross-correlated with the transmitted signal and subtracted frame-to-frame to produce a differential echo profile that isolates movement of the skin surface from static reflections. A 320-by-78-pixel moving window, representing two seconds of data, is fed into a FastViT encoder followed by pooling, dropout, and a fully connected layer, which regresses the window to grip force in kilograms. The 45-degree sensor angle, the wristband placement over the flexor tendons, and the differential echo profile are the design choices that carry the sensing claim.

What would settle it

Re-run the user study with a dynamometer that streams force data directly at 100 Hz or higher and recompute the three headline error rates; if the RMSE increases materially, the linear interpolation had smoothed away quick force transients and the reported percentages overstate accuracy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that active acoustic sensing can serve as a non-contact proxy for grip force: the wristband's speaker emits 20–29 kHz FMCW sweeps, and the microphone captures reflections whose timing, angle, and frequency shift change as the flexor tendons and overlying skin deform under tension. From these reflections the system builds a differential echo profile, and a vision-transformer regression model maps two-second windows of that profile to force in kilograms. Evaluated on 11 participants, the system reached a mean error rate of 10.10% (2.56 kg) in user-dependent testing, 9.08% (2.31 kg) after fine-tuning a user-independent foundation model with the participant's own data, and 12.29% (3.11 kg) in leave-one-user-out testing; error rates are reported relative to each participant's maximum voluntary contraction. The authors interpret this as evidence that the approach generalizes across remounting sessions, wrist orientations, and new users, thereby addressing a known weakness of EMG-based and optical grip-force sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ground-truth force trace is trustworthy, even though it was reconstructed from a 30 Hz video of a 15 Hz dynamometer display, with dropped frames filled by linear interpolation and upsampled to 100 Hz, a method the paper concedes may have compromised fidelity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Grip force can be tracked continuously from a wrist-worn device without obstructing the hand, because the sensing is non-contact and requires only a speaker and microphone.
  • A user-independent model removes the need for per-user calibration, so a wristband could work out of the box for new users at the reported 12.29% mean error rate.
  • Fine-tuning with a small amount of the user's own data improves mean error to 9.08%, suggesting accuracy can improve as more user data is collected.
  • The same skin-deformation signal could support force-based input for smartwatches and augmented reality, and grip-force monitoring for rehabilitation and aging-related health assessment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence the authors leave implicit is that the same acoustic principle might estimate other fine-grained muscle outputs, not just grip force, since any flexor-driven skin deformation would modulate the echo profile.
  • A testable extension is to replace the video-tracked dynamometer with a dynamometer that streams ground truth at high rate; this would show whether linear interpolation of the 15 Hz display inflated the reported accuracy.
  • The authors evaluate static postures only; a direct next experiment is to measure grip force during walking or arm motion to see whether the learned echo features survive real-world artifacts.
  • Because the sensor bracket was tuned to a 45-degree angle and a specific wrist position, off-the-shelf smartwatches with different speaker and microphone layouts may need hardware adjustment before achieving the same accuracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. EchoForce presents a wristband that uses active acoustic sensing (FMCW ultrasound) to estimate grip force from skin deformation at the wrist. The authors report a user study with 11 participants, across 15 sessions (5 per each of three wrist orientations) with device remounting, and evaluate four model configurations: user-dependent, user-independent (leave-one-user-out), fine-tuned, and cross-orientation. Headline results are 10.10% user-dependent error, 9.08% fine-tuned, 12.29% user-independent, and 12.94% cross-orientation error, expressed as RMSE divided by MVC. The paper claims these results are comparable to or better than EMG-based grip force estimation, and robust to remounting, orientation, and new users.

Significance. The paper makes a plausible and useful contribution: a low-cost, non-contact wristband for continuous grip force estimation with a careful evaluation protocol. The study design is a genuine strength—15 sessions with remounting, three orientations, leave-one-user-out testing, and cross-orientation evaluation are appropriate steps for demonstrating robustness. The hardware and signal-processing pipeline are described clearly enough to be reproduced. However, the headline accuracy figures depend on a ground-truth force trace reconstructed by linear interpolation from a ~15 Hz display filmed at 30 Hz (Section 3.3), a limitation the authors acknowledge in Section 6.4. Because the loss and error metrics are computed against this reconstructed trace, the reported RMSE values may be optimistic. If the accuracy claims survive a higher-fidelity ground truth, the system would be a meaningful advance for wearable grip-force sensing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3, Section 5.1, Table 1] The ground-truth force signal was reconstructed by filming a dynamometer display that updates at approximately 15 Hz, discarding frames with the hold indicator active, and filling gaps with linear interpolation upsampled to 100 Hz. Since the task instructed participants to ramp to target "as quickly and accurately as possible" and then release (Section 4.1), the true force contains rapid ramps and releases that linear interpolation would smooth. The RMSE-based error rates reported in Table 1 are therefore computed against a target that may be missing exactly those transients, which can artificially lower the reported error. The manuscript itself states in Section 6.4 that the interpolation "may have compromised the fidelity and accuracy of our ground truth." This is a load-bearing measurement-reference issue, not a criticism of the acoustic sensing mechanism. The authors should either re-analyze a subset of data with a streaming dynamometer (e.g., the one cited in Section 6.4) or quantitatively bound the effect of interpolation, for instance by simulating the interpolation on a known high-rate signal and reporting the induced RMSE reduction.
  2. [Section 5.1, Section 6.1] The claim that EchoForce is "comparable with EMG" relies on comparing error rates to Keir and Mogk's 11.4% (Section 6.1). However, the paper does not specify whether the RMSE/error rate is computed over the entire recording (including the one-second rest periods between trials, where force is near zero) or only over the active force-producing portions. If rest periods are included, the error over these near-zero intervals can dilute the RMSE, and the comparison to studies that may use different evaluation windows would be misleading. The authors should state the exact evaluation window and, if it includes rest, provide a sensitivity analysis with only active periods.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.4] The description of the input-output mapping is ambiguous: "The ground truth labels from the past two seconds and the extracted moving window from the echo profile compose a single pair of label and input." It is unclear whether the model predicts the entire two-second force trace, the instantaneous force at the end of the window, or something else, given that the decoder is an average pooling layer followed by a fully connected layer. Please clarify with a precise statement of tensor shapes and how echo windows are aligned with force labels.
  2. [Abstract and Section 5.1.2] The user-independent model is called a "foundation model" in the abstract, but it is trained on only ten users' data. This term is likely to be misread; consider using "pre-trained user-independent model" instead.
  3. [Table 1] Error rates are reported to two decimal places; given the ground-truth interpolation uncertainty, one decimal place or confidence intervals would better reflect the actual precision.
  4. [Section 6.4] There is a typographical error in the sentence about future dynamometers: "more suitable for precise, continuous monitoring of grip force over time [27])." has an extra closing parenthesis.
  5. [Figure 3] The caption says a five-point moving-average filter was applied for clarity; please specify whether this filter was applied to predictions only or to the ground truth as well, since applying it to both would affect the visual comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: grip-force targets are externally measured and held-out splits are genuine; Section 6.4 ground-truth interpolation is a fidelity concern, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

EchoForce's derivation chain is self-contained against an external reference. Grip force targets come from a CAMRY-EH10117 dynamometer, converted to kilograms, with MVC measured per participant; the acoustic echo profiles are inputs to a FastViT regressor. There is no equation in which the target is defined in terms of the acoustic features, nor is any headline number a renamed fit parameter. The user-dependent model is tested on held-out last sessions per orientation (12 training sessions, 3 test sessions per user); the user-independent model uses leave-one-user-out; cross-orientation evaluation leaves one orientation out. These are genuine generalization splits, not predictions of the fitting subset. The 45-degree transducer angle was chosen in a pilot study and then held fixed, so it is design selection rather than a prediction derived from the test set. Citations to prior acoustic sensing work (EchoWrist, GazeTrak, and FMCW references) supply hardware and signal-processing lineage, but not the force-estimation claim itself, which is evaluated with new user data. Section 6.4 explicitly states that linear interpolation of the dynamometer display 'may have compromised the fidelity and accuracy of our ground truth'; this is a ground-truth fidelity limitation that could inflate or deflate reported RMSE, but it is not circularity, because the model is fit to an independently measured force trace rather than to its own outputs or to a self-cited theorem. The error-rate normalization RMSE/MVC is a reporting convention, not a derivation of the result from the result. No circular step can be exhibited, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This ledger lists the manual configuration choices and domain assumptions that the reported accuracy depends on. The neural network weights are of course fitted to data (that is the method), but the entries above are the human-chosen constants and assumed premises that are not derived from first principles. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Transducer mount angle = 45 degrees
    Selected via pilot study comparing 45, 90, and 0 degrees; 45 degrees outperformed 90 by 4.19% and 0 was unstable. All reported results use this angle.
  • Echo profile window height = 78 pixels (13.93 cm)
    Hand-chosen to capture the tendinous section of the palmaris longus muscle (Section 3.4).
  • Training epochs = 40 (user-dependent), 10 (user-independent)
    Set based on pilot testing, not justified by a stopping criterion; affects final accuracy.
  • Per-participant MVC normalization = Mean 26.14 kg across participants
    Error rate is RMSE divided by MVC. If the simplified ASHT protocol underestimates true MVC, error rates are inflated (conservative), but the absolute RMSE values are the more direct performance numbers.
  • Deep learning hyperparameters = dropout 0.8, SGD lr 0.001, weight decay 0.001, batch size 60
    Hand-chosen; no sensitivity analysis is reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Finger flexor muscle contraction produces measurable skin deformation at the wrist that correlates with grip force.
    Fundamental sensing principle, stated in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption The acoustic reflection profile encodes these skin deformations sufficiently for regression.
    Relies on prior acoustic sensing work [21, 22, 48] without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Dynamometer display readings recorded by camera and linearly interpolated to 100 Hz provide valid ground truth.
    Section 3.3; the authors themselves note interpolation may compromise ground truth fidelity (Section 6.4).
  • domain assumption The simplified ASHT protocol yields a stable MVC baseline for error rate normalization.
    Section 4.1 and Section 6.4; average MVC was well below population norms, suggesting possible protocol effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EchoForce: Continuous Grip Force Estimation from Skin Deformation Using Active Acoustic Sensing on a Wristband." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDWIWWBH

@misc{pith2026250720437,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EchoForce: Continuous Grip Force Estimation from Skin Deformation Using Active Acoustic Sensing on a Wristband},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDWIWWBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20437}
}
read the original abstract

Grip force is commonly used as an overall health indicator in older adults and is valuable for tracking progress in physical training and rehabilitation. Existing methods for wearable grip force measurement are cumbersome and user-dependent, making them insufficient for practical, continuous grip force measurement. We introduce EchoForce, a novel wristband using acoustic sensing for low-cost, non-contact measurement of grip force. EchoForce captures acoustic signals reflected from subtle skin deformations by flexor muscles on the forearm. In a user study with 11 participants, EchoForce achieved a fine-tuned user-dependent mean error rate of 9.08% and a user-independent mean error rate of 12.3% using a foundation model. Our system remained accurate between sessions, hand orientations, and users, overcoming a significant limitation of past force sensing systems. EchoForce makes continuous grip force measurement practical, providing an effective tool for health monitoring and novel interaction techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20437 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of EchoForce’s sensing approach. (a) Wristband on a relaxed forearm. (b) Flexors of the anterior forearm, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study setup, with wrist (a) supinated, (b) neutral, or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Predictions for Participant 1 with a five-point moving-average filter applied for clarity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Charles O. Bechtol. 1954. GRIP TEST: The Use of a Dynamome- ter with Adjustable Handle Spacings. JBJS 36, 4 (July 1954), 820. https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/abstract/1954/36040/grip_test__the_ use_of_a_dynamometer_with.13.aspx

    work page 1954

  2. [2]

    Thisum Buddhika, Haimo Zhang, Samantha W. T. Chan, Vipula Dissanayake, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Roger Zimmermann. 2019. fSense: Unlocking the Dimension of Force for Gestural Interactions using Smartwatch PPG Sensor. In Proceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019 (AH2019) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1...

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Camry-HK. 2025. Camry EH101 Electronic Hand Dynamometer. http://www. camry-hk.com/portal/index/product_detail.html?id=317 [Online; accessed 22- May-2025]

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Celis-Morales, Paul Welsh, Donald M

    Carlos A. Celis-Morales, Paul Welsh, Donald M. Lyall, Lewis Steell, Fanny Pe- termann, Jana Anderson, Stamatina Iliodromiti, Anne Sillars, Nicholas Gra- ham, Daniel F. Mackay, Jill P. Pell, Jason M. R. Gill, Naveed Sattar, and Stu- art R. Gray. 2018. Associations of grip strength with cardiovascular, respira- tory, and cancer outcomes and all cause mortal...

    work page doi:10.1136/bmj.k1651 2018

  5. [5]

    Chowdhury, Mamun B

    Rubana H. Chowdhury, Mamun B. I. Reaz, Mohd Alauddin Bin Mohd Ali, Ashrif A. A. Bakar, Kalaivani Chellappan, and Tae G. Chang. 2013. Surface Electromyo- graphy Signal Processing and Classification Techniques. Sensors 13, 9 (2013), 12431–12466. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130912431

    doi:10.3390/s130912431 2013

  6. [6]

    E.A Clancy, E.L Morin, and R Merletti. 2002. Sampling, noise-reduction and ampli- tude estimation issues in surface electromyography. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 12, 1 (2002), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00033-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(01)00033-5 2002

  7. [7]

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xi- aohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. 2020. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. CoRR abs/2010.11929 (2020). arXiv:2010.11929 https://arxiv.org/a...

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Junjun Fan, Xiangmin Fan, Feng Tian, Yang Li, Zitao Liu, Wei Sun, and Hongan Wang. 2018. What is That in Your Hand? Recognizing Grasped Objects via Fore- arm Electromyography Sensing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4 (Dec. 2018), 161:1–161:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287039

    work page doi:10.1145/3287039 2018

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Forman, Garrick N

    Davis A. Forman, Garrick N. Forman, Jason Robathan, and Michael W. R. Holmes

  2. [10]

    Nobuhiro Funato and Kentaro Takemura. 2017. Grip Force Estimation by Emitting Vibration. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Inter- face Software and Technology (UIST ’17 Adjunct) . Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–142. ...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Heather Gareis, Solomonow Moshe, Richard Baratta, Robert Best, and Robert D’Ambrosia. 1992. The isometric length-force models of nine different skeletal muscles. Journal of Biomechanics 25, 8 (Aug. 1992), 903–916. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0021-9290(92)90230-X

    1992

  4. [12]

    Kaiyi Guo, Qian Zhang, and Dong Wang. 2025. EchoBreath: Continuous Respira- tory Behavior Recognition in the Wild via Acoustic Sensing on Smart Glasses. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems (CHI ’25) . Association for Computing Mach...

    2025

  5. [13]

    Javad Hashemi, Evelyn Morin, Parvin Mousavi, and Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad

  6. [14]

    Marco J. M. Hoozemans and Jaap H. van Dieën. 2005. Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 15, 4 (Aug. 2005), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.09. 001

    2005 doi

  7. [15]

    Ha-Young Jeong, Na-Hyeon Kim, Ji-Hyun Choi, and Chan-Su Lee. 2021. Hand Grip Strength Estimation for Sarcopenia Diagnosis by Finger Tracking. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Asia (ICCE-Asia) . 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Asia53811.2021.9641983

    2021

  8. [16]

    Tomoko Kamimura and Yoshikazu Ikuta. 2002. Evaluation of Sustained Grip Strength for a Stroke Patient with a Mild Paresis. Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences 51, 1 (March 2002), 23–31

    2002

  9. [17]

    Keir, , and Jeremy P.M

    Peter J. Keir, , and Jeremy P.M. Mogk. 2005. The development and val- idation of equations to predict grip force in the workplace: contributions of muscle activity and posture. Ergonomics 48, 10 (Aug. 2005), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500277591 Publisher: Taylo...

    2005 doi

  10. [18]

    Jiwan Kim and Ian Oakley. 2022. SonarID: Using Sonar to Identify Fingers on a Smartwatch. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 287, 10 pa...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Jiwan Kim, Jiwan Son, and Ian Oakley. 2025. Cross, Dwell, or Pinch: Designing and Evaluating Around-Device Selection Methods for Unmodified Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25) . Association for Computing Machi...

    2025

  12. [20]

    Gregorij Kurillo, Milan Gregorič, Nika Goljar, and Tadej Bajd. 2005. Grip force tracking system for assessment and rehabilitation of hand function. Technology and Health Care 13, 3 (May 2005), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2005- 13301 Publisher: SAGE Publications

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    Chi-Jung Lee, Ruidong Zhang, Devansh Agarwal, Tianhong Catherine Yu, Vipin Gunda, Oliver Lopez, James Kim, Sicheng Yin, Boao Dong, Ke Li, et al . 2024. Echowrist: Continuous hand pose tracking and hand-object interaction recogni- tion using low-power active acoustic sensing on...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Ke Li, Ruidong Zhang, Boao Chen, Siyuan Chen, Sicheng Yin, Saif Mahmud, Qikang Liang, François Guimbretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2024. GazeTrak: Ex- ploring Acoustic-based Eye Tracking on a Glass Frame. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computin...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Ke Li, Ruidong Zhang, Siyuan Chen, Boao Chen, Mose Sakashita, François Guim- bretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2024. EyeEcho: Continuous and Low-power Facial Expression Tracking on Glasses. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–24

    2024

  16. [24]

    Bor-Shing Lin, I-Jung Lee, and Jean-Lon Chen. 2020. Novel Assembled Sensorized Glove Platform for Comprehensive Hand Function Assessment by Using Inertial Sensors and Force Sensing Resistors. IEEE Sensors Journal 20, 6 (March 2020), 3379–3389. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2958533

    2020

  17. [25]

    Brown, Edward A

    Pu Liu, Donald R. Brown, Edward A. Clancy, Francois Martel, and Denis Rancourt

  18. [26]

    Clancy, and D

    Pu Liu, Francois Martel, Denis Rancourt, Edward A. Clancy, and D. Richard Brown

  19. [27]

    Biometrics Ltd. 2025. Hand Grip Dynamometer. https://www.biometricsltd. com/hand-grip-dynamometer.htm [Online; accessed 10-Jul-2025]

    2025

  20. [28]

    In 2013 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)

    EMG-force estimation for multiple fingers. In 2013 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB) . 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB. 2013.6736772

    2013

  21. [29]

    Saif Mahmud, Ke Li, Guilin Hu, Hao Chen, Richard Jin, Ruidong Zhang, François Guimbretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2023. PoseSonic: 3D Upper Body Pose Es- timation Through Egocentric Acoustic Sensing on Smartglasses. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 7, 3, Articl...

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Saif Mahmud, Vineet Parikh, Qikang Liang, Ke Li, Ruidong Zhang, Ashwin Ajit, Vipin Gunda, Devansh Agarwal, Francois Guimbretiere, and Cheng Zhang. 2024. ActSonic: Recognizing Everyday Activities from Inaudible Acoustic Wave Around the Body. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ub...

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Maier and Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond

    Marc A. Maier and Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond. 1995. EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip. Experimental Brain Research 103, 1 (Jan. 1995), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241969

    1995 doi

  24. [32]

    Saif Mahmud, Devansh Agarwal, Ashwin Ajit, Qikang Liang, Thalia Viranda, Francois Guimbretiere, and Cheng Zhang. 2024. MunchSonic: Tracking Fine- grained Dietary Actions through Active Acoustic Sensing on Eyeglasses. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on We...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Jeremy P. M. Mogk and Peter J. Keir. 2006. Prediction of forearm muscle ac- tivity during gripping. Ergonomics 49, 11 (Sept. 2006), 1121–1130. https: //doi.org/10.1080/00140130600777433 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600777433

    2006 doi

  26. [35]

    Vimal Mollyn and Chris Harrison. 2024. EgoTouch: On-Body Touch Input Using AR/VR Headset Cameras. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’24) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.or...

    2024

  27. [36]

    Roberto Merletti and Philip J Parker. 2004. Electromyography: physiology, engi- neering, and non-invasive applications . John Wiley & Sons

    2004

  28. [37]

    Makoto Ono, Buntarou Shizuki, and Jiro Tanaka. 2013. Touch & activate: adding interactivity to existing objects using active acoustic sensing. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machin...

    2013

  29. [38]

    Vineet Parikh, Saif Mahmud, Devansh Agarwal, Ke Li, François Guimbretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2024. EchoGuide: Active Acoustic Guidance for LLM-Based Eating Event Analysis from Egocentric Videos. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Melbo...

    2024

  30. [39]

    Phinyomark, A

    A. Phinyomark, A. Nuidod, P. Phukpattaranont, and C. Limsakul. 2012. Feature Extraction and Reduction of Wavelet Transform Coefficients for EMG Pattern Classification. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 122, 6 (Jun. 2012), 27–32. https: //doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1816

    2012 doi

  31. [40]

    Nielsen, Steffen Holmgaard, Ning Jiang, Kevin B

    Johnny L.G. Nielsen, Steffen Holmgaard, Ning Jiang, Kevin B. Englehart, Dario Farina, and Phil A. Parker. 2011. Simultaneous and Proportional Force Estimation for Multifunction Myoelectric Prostheses Using Mirrored Bilateral Training.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering...

    2011

  32. [41]

    Ligman, Vittorio Caggiano, and Stephen J

    Katsuyuki Sakuma, Avner Abrami, Gaddi Blumrosen, Stanislav Lukashov, Rajeev Narayanan, Joseph W. Ligman, Vittorio Caggiano, and Stephen J. Heisig. 2018. Wearable Nail Deformation Sensing for Behavioral and Biomechanical Monitor- ing and Human-Computer Interaction. Scientific R...

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    Tan, Dan Morris, and Ravin Balakrishnan

    T Scott Saponas, Desney S. Tan, Dan Morris, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2008. Demonstrating the feasibility of using forearm electromyography for muscle- computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08) . Association for ...

    2008

  34. [43]

    Scott Saponas, Desney S

    T. Scott Saponas, Desney S. Tan, Dan Morris, Ravin Balakrishnan, Jim Turner, and James A. Landay. 2009. Enabling always-available input with muscle-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST ’09) . Assoc...

    2009

  35. [44]

    Julius Cosmo Romeo Rudolph, David Holman, Bruno De Araujo, Ricardo Jota, Daniel Wigdor, and Valkyrie Savage. 2022. Sensing Hand Interactions with Everyday Objects by Profiling Wrist Topography. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and...

    2022

  36. [45]

    Rujia Sun, Xiaohe Zhou, Benjamin Steeper, Ruidong Zhang, Sicheng Yin, Ke Li, Shengzhang Wu, Sam Tilsen, Francois Guimbretiere, and Cheng Zhang. 2023. EchoNose: Sensing Mouth, Breathing and Tongue Gestures inside Oral Cavity using a Non-contact Nose Interface. In Proceedings of...

    2023

  37. [46]

    Ruiz, Tamás Csányi, and Francisco B

    Lucía Sánchez-Aranda, Javier Fernández-Ortega, Isabel Martín-Fuentes, Ángel Toval, Gregor Jurak, Jonatan R. Ruiz, Tamás Csányi, and Francisco B. Ortega

  38. [47]

    Pavan Kumar Anasosalu Vasu, James Gabriel, Jeff Zhu, Oncel Tuzel, and Anurag Ranjan. 2023. FastViT: A Fast Hybrid Vision Transformer using Structural Reparameterization. arXiv:2303.14189 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14189

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Yewguan Soo, Masao Sugi, Hiroshi Yokoi, Tamio Arai, Masataka Nishino, Ryu Kato, Tatsuhiro Nakamura, and Jun Ota. 2010. Estimation of handgrip force using frequency-band technique during fatiguing muscle contraction. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 20, 5 (Oct. 2010)...

    2010

  40. [49]

    Bohannon, Xiaoyan Li, Bhagwant Sindhu, and Jay Kapellusch

    Ying-Chih Wang, Richard W. Bohannon, Xiaoyan Li, Bhagwant Sindhu, and Jay Kapellusch. 2018. Hand-Grip Strength: Normative Reference Values and Equations for Individuals 18 to 85 Years of Age Residing in the United States. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 48, 9 ...

    2018

  41. [50]

    Changcheng Wu, Hong Zeng, Aiguo Song, and Baoguo Xu. 2017. Grip Force and 3D Push-Pull Force Estimation Based on sEMG and GRNN. Frontiers in Neuroscience Volume 11 - 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00343

    2017

  42. [51]

    Zhigang Yin, Mohan Liyanage, Abdul-Rasheed Ottun, Souvik Paul, Agustin Zuniga, Petteri Nurmi, and Huber Flores. 2023. HIPPO: Pervasive Hand-Grip Esti- mation from Everyday Interactions. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 4 (Jan. 2023), 209:1–209:30. https...

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    Cheng Zhang, Sinan Hersek, Yiming Pu, Danrui Sun, Qiuyue Xue, Thad E Starner, Gregory D Abowd, and Omer T Inan. 2017. Bioacoustics-based human-body- mediated communication. Computer 50, 2 (2017), 36–46

    2017

  44. [53]

    Tianben Wang, Daqing Zhang, Yuanqing Zheng, Tao Gu, Xingshe Zhou, and Bernadette Dorizzi. 2018. C-FMCW Based Contactless Respiration Detection Using Acoustic Signal. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 4, Article 170 (Jan. 2018), 20 pages. https://doi.org/...

    2018 doi

  45. [54]

    Qian Zhang, Yubin Lan, Kaiyi Guo, and Dong Wang. 2024. Lipwatch: Enabling Silent Speech Recognition on Smartwatches using Acoustic Sensing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 2, Article 84 (May 2024), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3659614

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    Ruidong Zhang, Ke Li, Yihong Hao, Yufan Wang, Zhengnan Lai, François Guim- bretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2023. EchoSpeech: Continuous Silent Speech Recog- nition on Minimally-Obtrusive Eyewear Powered by Acoustic Sensing. In Pro- ceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Facto...

    2023

  47. [56]

    Ruidong Zhang, Jihai Zhang, Nitish Gade, Peng Cao, Seyun Kim, Junchi Yan, and Cheng Zhang. 2022. EatingTrak: Detecting Fine-grained Eating Moments in the Wild Using a Wrist-mounted IMU. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, MHCI, Article 214 (Sept. 2022), 22 pages. https://doi.o...

    2022 doi

  48. [58]

    Cheng Zhang, Qiuyue Xue, Anandghan Waghmare, Ruichen Meng, Sumeet Jain, Yizeng Han, Xinyu Li, Kenneth Cunefare, Thomas Ploetz, Thad Starner, et al

  49. [2013]

    Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 23, 2 (April 2013), 416–424

    Surface EMG force modeling with joint angle based calibration. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 23, 2 (April 2013), 416–424. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.10.011

    2013 doi

  50. [2014]

    In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Fingertip force estimation from forearm muscle electrical activity. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . 2069–2073. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6853963 ISSN: 2379-190X

    2014

  51. [2018]

    In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    FingerPing: Recognizing fine-grained hand poses using active acoustic on-body sensing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–10

    2018

  52. [2019]

    Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 45 (April 2019), 53–60

    The influence of simultaneous handgrip and wrist force on forearm muscle activity. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 45 (April 2019), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.02.004

    2019 doi

  53. [2024]

    https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.25.24309304 Pages: 2024.06.25.24309304

    Reliability and criterion validity of a low-cost handgrip dynamometer: The Camry. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.25.24309304 Pages: 2024.06.25.24309304

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.