Spectral localization of single-nanoparticle plasmons through photonic substrate engineering

Guangxin Liu; Jindong Ai; Jing-Feng Liu; Juan-Feng Zhu; Lijun Guo; Lin Wu; Renming Liu; Shihao Feng; Wei Li; Wenjie Zhou

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Spectral localization of single-nanoparticle plasmons through photonic substrate engineering

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The absorption and scattering spectrum of a single-nanoparticle plasmon in a photonic environment is controlled by the substrate's M-factor spectrum, so engineering that spectrum can shrink linewidths below 1 nm.

desk verdict Useful experimental phenomenology, but the 87x Q claim is likely a passive filter effect of the M-factor prefactor, not a reduction of SPR damping. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07699 v1 pith:GEGKBYF5 submitted 2025-09-09 physics.optics

Shihao Feng , Juan-Feng Zhu , Xinyi Fan , Jindong Ai , Wenjie Zhou , Guangxin Liu , Jing-Feng Liu , Renming Liu

show 3 more authors

Wei Li Lijun Guo Lin Wu

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics

keywords surfaceplasmonresonancespectrallocalizationphotonicsubstrateengineeringprojectedlocaldensityofstatesM-factorholeburningFanooptoplasmonics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the spectral sharpness of a single metal nanoparticle's surface plasmon resonance is set not by the particle alone but by the optical pathways its substrate opens to the vacuum. It derives a mode-coupling expression in which the nanoparticle spectrum is the product of the substrate's M-factor spectrum and the imaginary part of a dressed Green function containing the plasmon, the photonic modes, and their couplings. The M-factor—the normalized projected local density of states—marks whether the substrate opens or closes radiative pathways, which determines whether the coupled system shows spectral localization, spectral hole burning, or Fano destruction. Simulations on a photonic-crystal substrate yield a 0.55 nm linewidth with Q around 1270 and a fivefold mode-volume reduction, and experiments on leaky Fabry-Perot substrates reproduce all four predicted spectral behaviors.

What carries the argument

The M-factor spectrum F_m(r,ω,μ̂_d), defined as the normalized projected local density of states, is the control knob of the argument. It enters Eq. (3) both as a prefactor scaling the spectrum and, through the engineered photonic modes, as the source of the coupling terms in the denominator. The distinction F_m>1 versus F_m<1 defines 'open' and 'closed' optical pathways, and the paper claims this distinction, together with resonance or detuning, organizes the four observed spectral behaviors. The mode-coupling self-energy sum Σ_j g_j^2/(ℏω-ε_cj+iΓ_cj/2) carries the hybridization between the plasmon and the photonic environment.

What would settle it

Compute the coupling strengths from a simulated field-overlap integral using only substrate geometry and material data, then use Eq. (3) to forecast the scattering spectrum of a gold nanorod on a substrate thickness not used in fitting; a mismatch in linewidth or line shape would falsify the claim that Eq. (3) predicts spectral localization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the spectrum of a single-nanoparticle surface plasmon coupled to a photonic environment is described by Eq. (3): the line shape is proportional to -F_m Im{1/(ℏω-ε_d+iΓ_d/2 - Σ_j g_j^2/(ℏω-ε_cj+iΓ_cj/2))}. Here F_m is the multiplication-factor spectrum of the projected local density of states evaluated at the nanoparticle position, and the denominator shows the plasmon mode dressed by a sum over photonic modes with coupling strengths g_j. The paper claims this formula is universal for optoplasmonic hybrids: an 'open' optical pathway with F_m>1 gives spectral localization for both resonant and detuned plasmons, while a 'closed' pathway with F_m<1 gives spectral hole

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the coupling strengths between the nanoparticle's plasmon and each photonic mode are known independently of the spectra being explained; if they are instead fitted to those spectra, the central formula describes the results rather than predicting them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Single nanoparticles, not just periodic metasurfaces, can reach sub-nanometer plasmonic linewidths through substrate choice alone.
The M-factor criterion predicts when an optoplasmonic system will show spectral localization, spectral hole burning, or Fano destruction, unifying previously scattered observations.
The strategy is modular: different nanoparticle shapes and substrate configurations can be combined, and substrate thickness provides a tuning handle for linewidth and resonant wavelength.
Photonic substrate engineering also shrinks the mode volume by fivefold in the simulated design, which strengthens light-matter interactions relevant to sensing and quantum optics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the coupling strengths g_j can be derived independently from field-overlap integrals, Eq. (3) becomes a design rule: one could search substrate geometries for target M-factor spectra rather than tuning by trial and error.
The same M-factor logic could transfer to single emitters such as molecules or quantum dots placed on the same substrates, where the competition between emitter and photonic linewidths would parallel the plasmon case.
The open/closed pathway language suggests a decay-rate picture in which open pathways redistribute radiative loss into the photonic mode while closed pathways block it; quantifying total radiative decay across the four quadrants would test this interpretation directly.
A natural next experiment is to map the M-factor spectrum by confocal measurement at the same height used in the simulations and overlay the measured single-nanoparticle spectrum, testing Eq. (3) without fitted coupling parameters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read the paper. It has real experimental content and a useful organizing idea: photonic substrates can create 'open' or 'closed' optical pathways that reshape single-nanoparticle scattering spectra, and the four-quadrant picture (localization, hole burning, Fano destruction) does tie together earlier optoplasmonic observations. The experiments themselves seem plausible: the 146->50 meV narrowing on the leaky FP substrate and the closed-OP hole burning are well-documented.

The problem is the central quantitative claim. Eq. (3) has F_m as a prefactor multiplying the entire dipole response. F_m already shows a 0.55 nm Lorentzian peak for the bare substrate. If you put an uncoupled plasmon (all g_j=0) into the same formula, the product is exactly a narrow peak at the F_m linewidth. The reported 87x Q enhancement is therefore consistent with passive spectral filtering by the substrate, and the paper never isolates the coupling term's contribution. The analytic curves are matched to data with g_j values that are never specified; absent a way to compute g_j from geometry, Eq. (3) is a parameterization, not a prediction. The mode-volume comparison also needs scrutiny: on the photonic substrate the 'mode' is partly photonic, so a fivefold reduction relative to a bare AuNR on TiO2 is not a like-for-like statement about the plasmon.

That said, the paper is not a waste. The qualitative framework and the two proof-of-concept experiments are worth publishing, but the framing needs to change. The authors should either (a) compute g_j from overlap integrals or a Green's function decomposition, or (b) explicitly state that the narrowing is a local-density-of-states filtering effect, in which case 'Q enhancement' is a property of the substrate resonance, not the plasmon. The experiments demonstrating open vs closed OP control remain the real contribution.

Verdict: worth a serious referee, but with the expectation of major revision. The authors need to separate the F_m prefactor effect from the coupling term, disclose the g_j values, and temper the abstract. As it stands, the paper overclaims what Eq. (3) shows.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a strategy for spectrally localizing single-nanoparticle surface plasmon resonances by engineering the photonic substrate. A mode-coupling model, Eq. (3), is introduced in which the scattering/absorption spectrum is proportional to the product of the substrate M-factor F_m and the imaginary part of a Green function that includes coupling to a discrete set of photonic modes. For an FP-PCGR substrate, simulations show a simulated linewidth of 0.55 nm, Q~1270, an 87-fold Q enhancement, and a fivefold mode-volume reduction. Experiments on open and closed leaking Fabry–Pérot substrates demonstrate linewidth narrowing, spectral hole burning, and Fano-resonance destruction, classified into four quadrants.

Significance. If the predictive framework were fully established, the paper would be significant for single-nanoparticle plasmonics: it offers a route to high spectral localization without precise nanoparticle positioning, and it unifies several previously disconnected optoplasmonic phenomena into a single picture. The experimental four-quadrant demonstration, the explicit analytical formula, and the detailed simulations are credit-worthy. However, the central quantitative and conceptual claims currently depend on coupling constants g_j that are not independently derived, and the multiplicative F_m prefactor alone can explain the reported narrowing. Thus the significance is real but contingent on a more rigorous validation of Eq. (3) as a predictive tool.

major comments (3)

[Results, 'Universal theoretical framework', Eq. (3)] The coupling constants g_j between the SPR mode and each photonic mode are introduced in Eq. (3) but are never derived, measured, or computed from the geometry anywhere in the main text or Methods. The analytical curves in Figs. 2e, 3c, and 4c are fitted to the very simulated/measured spectra they are claimed to predict. If g_j is a fit parameter, Eq. (3) is a parameterization rather than a predictive theory. Please provide the independent values of g_j and the formula/algorithm used to obtain them from the structural parameters, e.g., overlap integrals of the plasmon and cavity mode profiles.
[Results, 'Designing photonic substrates for ultrasharp (<1 nm) SPR', Fig. 2e and Eq. (3)] Because F_m multiplies the entire Green function, a narrow Lorentzian feature in F_m alone can produce a narrow scattering line even with all g_j = 0, i.e., -F_m Im[1/(ℏω - ε_d + iΓ_d/2)]. The reported linewidth compression (146 meV to 50 meV in Fig. 3c, and 0.55 nm in Fig. 2e) is quantitatively consistent with passive spectral filtering by the substrate. The paper never isolates the self-energy contribution. A g_j = 0 control calculation for the same F_m is required to support the claim that the Q enhancement arises from hybridization and 'substantial suppression of radiative losses' rather than from the frequency-dependent prefactor.
[Results and Fig. 1c/Fig. 4c] The four-quadrant phenomenology (spectral localization, spectral hole burning, Fano destruction) follows directly from the shape of F_m: a narrow F_m peak yields localization, while F_m < 1 or Fano-shaped F_m yields hole burning and Fano destruction. The experimental data therefore do not independently establish the need for the multimode coupling self-energy in Eq. (3). The authors should show a case where the prediction changes qualitatively when the g_j sum is included versus omitted, and where the role of F_m is separately controled.

minor comments (4)

[General typesetting] Many equations contain garbled or unusual characters (e.g., Eq. (2) shows '𝑑𝑑0+' and '𝐻𝐻𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑'). The manuscript needs a careful pass through the equation rendering.
[Methods, Eqs. (5)-(7)] The sign conventions in Poynting's theorem and the definitions of current density are presented loosely; the notation should be made consistent across Eqs. (5)-(7).
[References] Several references are incomplete (e.g., refs. 8 and 19 lack full author lists/titles). Please standardize the reference format.
[Fig. 4b] In Fig. 4b, the two F_m spectra for the different Au film thicknesses (45 nm and 75 nm) are not clearly distinguished in the legend; please clarify which curve corresponds to which thickness.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Eq. (3) curves are matches to the spectra they claim to predict: coupling strengths are never independently specified, and the narrow linewidth is already present in the input F_m prefactor.

fitted input called prediction [Eq. (3); Results, "Designing photonic substrates for ultrasharp (<1 nm) SPR," Fig. 2e; also Figs. 3c/4c]
"𝜎𝜎(𝜔𝜔) ∝ −𝐹𝐹𝑚𝑚(𝒓𝒓, 𝜔𝜔, 𝝁𝝁�𝑑𝑑) Im{ℏ𝜔𝜔 − 𝜀𝜀𝑑𝑑 + i𝛤𝛤𝑑𝑑/2 − Σ_j 𝑔𝑔𝑗𝑗^2/(ℏ𝜔𝜔 − 𝜀𝜀𝑐𝑐𝑗𝑗 + i𝛤𝛤𝑐𝑐𝑗𝑗/2)}−1 ... where 𝑔𝑔𝑗𝑗 is the coupling strength between the SPR mode and the jth photonic mode ... The M-factor can be accurately obtained through numerical simulations ... As evidenced in Fig. 2e, this phenomenon can be accurately predicted by our analytical calculations using Eq. (3)."

Eq. (3) contains the coupling constants g_j and all mode energies/linewidths, but the paper never specifies how g_j is derived, measured, or computed from the geometry. The dashed blue 'analytical' curves in Figs. 2e, 3c, and 4c are overlaid on the very simulated/measured spectra to which they are said to correspond. With g_j free, the denominator can be adjusted to reproduce any target spectrum, so the agreement is a fit to the data, not an independent prediction. The claim that Eq. (3) 'accurately predicts' the spectral localization is therefore circular: the output is used to choose the parameters that produce the output.
self definitional [Fig. 2c/e; Eq. (3)]
"characterized by a Lorentzian peak in the M-factor Fm spectrum, centered at 697.5 nm, with ... ultranarrow damping linewidth of approximately 0.55 nm ... characterized by a damping linewidth of 0.55 nm and a corresponding Q-factor of 1270, approximately 87 times higher than ... on a bulk dielectric (TiO2) substrate."

By Eq. (3), the scattering/absorption spectrum is F_m times the Green-function factor. The F_m input shown in Fig. 2c already has a 0.55 nm Lorentzian peak at the same wavelength, so the product spectrum will display a ~0.55 nm feature even if all g_j=0. The reported 0.55 nm SPR linewidth and 87× Q-factor are thus substantially inherited from the M-factor prefactor, which is an input to the calculation. The paper attributes the narrowing to OP/coupling physics and 'substantial suppression of radiative losses,' but it never isolates the self-energy (g_j) contribution; the quantitative localization claim is put into the prefactor rather than derived from the coupling mechanism.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine, self-contained numerical/experimental findings: the FEM/FDTD simulations and dark-field measurements show line narrowing on engineered substrates, and the four-quadrant phenomenology is a useful organization of prior optoplasmonic observations. However, the paper's own Eq. (3) is used as the 'universal theoretical framework,' and the analytical curves that are said to be predicted by Eq. (3) rely on coupling strengths g_j that are never independently specified. Because the M-factor F_m is computed from the bare substrate and already exhibits the narrow Lorentzian that later appears as the SPR linewidth, the central mechanism claim—that the coupling sum suppresses radiative losses and boosts Q by ~87×—is not separated from the passive F_m filter. This is a partial circularity in the predictive claim rather than a wholesale fabrication: the simulations and experiments stand on their own, but the theoretical explanation as presented reduces the analytical match to fitting and the narrow linewidth to an input prefactor. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found; cited prior work is standard and not used to force the result. Score 6 reflects that some central 'predictions' reduce by construction while independent simulation/experiment content remains.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative predictions rest on unspecified coupling parameters (g_j) and on the M-factor of the bare substrate, which already carries the narrow photonic resonance that produces the reported linewidth. The framework itself is standard coupled-mode theory, not a new entity-based model; no new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (1)

Coupling strengths g_j between SPR and photonic modes = Not specified in paper
Eq. (3) requires g_j for each photonic mode, but no derivation, simulation, or measurement is provided. The analytic curves in Figs. 2e, 3c, and 4c match the target spectra, implying g_j is fitted to reproduce them.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The MNP supports a single well-defined bosonic dipolar plasmonic mode, with higher multipoles neglected.
Used to write Eq. (1) in the 'Universal theoretical framework' section. Invalid if the particle is large or the environment excites quadrupole modes.
domain assumption The weak excitation field is negligible compared to the optical-pathway fields (E0 << E_alpha).
Drops E0 from Eq. (1). This is stated in the text and holds for weak driving but fails for strong nonlinear excitation.
standard math Fermi's Golden rule and the retarded Zubarev Green function formalism apply to this lossy open system.
Basis for Eq. (2) and the derivation in Supplementary Note 1. Standard but assumes Markovian weak coupling to the continuum.
domain assumption The M-factor F_m computed for the bare substrate (without the nanoparticle) gives the local electromagnetic environment at the nanoparticle position in the coupled system.
F_m is simulated for the bare substrate via Poynting's theorem (Eq. 7), then inserted in Eq. (3) alongside the nanoparticle. The nanoparticle's back-action on F_m is neglected.
domain assumption The scattering spectrum of the SPR mode is described by the same Eq. (3) as absorption, with negligible intensity differences.
States 'assuming that differences in intensity are negligible' just before Eq. (3) in the main text. Needed because experiments measure scattering, while the derivation starts from absorption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral localization of single-nanoparticle plasmons through photonic substrate engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GEGKBYF5

@misc{pith2026250907699,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral localization of single-nanoparticle plasmons through photonic substrate engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GEGKBYF5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07699}
}

read the original abstract

Surface plasmon resonances (SPRs) are crucial for confining light beyond the diffraction limit, yet heavy metal losses often limit their spectral localization. Here, we propose a practical strategy for enabling the spectral localization of single-nanoparticle SPRs through photonic substrate engineering, which creates distinct optical pathways (OPs) to tailor the electromagnetic environments around plasmonic nanoparticles. By analyzing the multiplication factor spectrum of the projected local density of states, we can trace and control these OPs, enabling strong spatial and spectral confinement of single-nanoparticle SPRs. Simulations reveal that a photonic crystal substrate can reduce the mode volume by fivefold and boost the quality factor by over 80 times compared to a metal nanoparticle on a dielectric substrate. Proof-of-concept experiments using two types of leaking Fabry-Perot photonic substrates demonstrate active manipulation of SPRs in both "open" and "closed" OP states. This multidimensional photonic substrate engineering establishes a customizable platform for single-nanoparticle plasmonics, potentially transforming applications that were previously limited by spectral localization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

[1]

& Barnes, W

Törmä, P. & Barnes, W. L. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 013901 (2015)

work page 2015
[2]

Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010)

2010
[3]

Haffner, C. et al. Low-loss plasmon- assisted electro -optic modulator . Nature 556, 483–486 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Guo, X. et al. Efficient all-optical plasmonic modulators with atomically thin Van Der Waals heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907105 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Brolo, A. G. Plasmonics for future biosensors. Nat. Photonics 6, 709–713 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

Rodrigo, O. et al. Mid-infrared plasmonic biosensing with graphene . Science 349, 165–168 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

Kauranen and A

M. Kauranen and A. V. Zayats, Nat. Photonics 6, 737–748 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

P., Shi, X., Dichtl, P., Maier, S

Nielsen, M. P., Shi, X., Dichtl, P., Maier, S. A. & Oulton, R. F. Giant nonlinear response at a plasmonic nanofocus drives efficient four -wave mixing . Science 358,1179-1181 (2017)

work page 2017

Show all 64 references

[9]

& Zhang, X

Fang, N., Lee, H., Sun, C. & Zhang, X. Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science 308, 534–537 (2005)

2005
[10]

Willets, K. A. , Wilson, A. J. , Sundaresan, V. & Joshi, P. B. Super-resolution imaging and plasmonics. Chem. Rev. 117, 7538–7582 (2017)

2017
[11]

Talebian, S., Wallace, G. G. , Schroeder, A., Stellacci, F. & Conde, J. Nanotechnology-based disinfectants and sensors for SARS -CoV-2. Nature Nanotech. 15, 618–624 (2020)

2020
[12]

Kumar, A., Kim, S., & Nam, J. –M. Plasmonically engineered nanoprobes for biomedical applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14509–14525 (2016)

2016
[13]

Khurgin, J. B. How to deal with the loss in plasmonics and metamaterials . Nature 18 Nanotech. 10, 2–6 (2015)

2015
[14]

& Odom, T

Zhou, W. & Odom, T. W. Tunable subradiant lattice plasmons by out -of-plane dipolar interactions. Nature Nanotech. 6, 423–427 (2011)

2011
[15]

Boriskina, S. V. et al. Losses in plasmonics: from mitigating energy dissipation to embracing loss-enabled functionalities. Adv. Opt. Photonics 9, 775-827 (2017)

2017
[16]

Lu, H. -Y. et al. Extracting more light for vertical emission: high power continuous wave operation of 1.3 -μm quantum -dot photonic -crystal surface - emitting laser based on a flat band. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 108 (2019)

2019
[17]

Kim, H., Noda, S., Song, B. -S. & Asano, T. Determination of nonlinear optical efficiencies of ultrahigh -Q photonic crystal nanocavities with structural imperfections. ACS Photonics 8, 2839−2845 (2021)

2021
[18]

& Mazur, E

Tang, H., Ni, X., Du, F., Srikrishna, V. & Mazur, E. On-chip light trap ping in bilayer moiré photonic crystal slabs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 231702 (2022)

2022
[19]

& Jing, Y

Oudich, M., Kong, X., Zhang, T., Qiu, C. & Jing, Y. Engineered moiré photonic and phononic superlattices. Nat. Mater. 23, 1169–1178 (2024)

2024
[20]

Wang, B. et al. Generating optical vortex beams by momentum -space polarization vortices centred at bound states in the continuum . Nat. Photonics 14, 623–628 (2020)

2020
[21]

Increasing the Q-contrast in large photonic crystal slab resonators using bound-states-in-continuum

Zhou, M. Increasing the Q-contrast in large photonic crystal slab resonators using bound-states-in-continuum. ACS Photonics 10, 1519–1528 (2023)

2023
[22]

Huang, C. et al. Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers . Science 367, 1018–1021 (2020)

2020
[23]

Liu, Z. et al. High-quasibound states in the continuum for nonlinear metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253901 (2019)

2019
[24]

Meinzer, N., Barnes, W. L. & I, R. Hooper, Plasmonic meta -atoms and metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 8, 889–898 (2014)

2014
[25]

Liang, Y., Tsai, D. P. & Kivshar, Y. From local to nonlocal high-plasmonic metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053801 (2024)

2024
[26]

Bin-Alam, M. S. et al. Ultra-high-Q resonances in plasmonic metasurfaces. Nat. 19 Commun. 12, 974 (2021)

2021
[27]

Liang, Y. et al. Bound states in the continuum in anisotropic plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 20, 6351−6356 (2020)

2020
[28]

Ahn, W., Hong, Y., Boriskina, S. V. & Reinhard. B. M. Demonstration of efficient on-chip photon transfer in self -assembled optoplasmonic networks . ACS nano 7, 4470–4478 (2013)

2013
[29]

Peng, P. et al. Enhancing coherent light -matter interactions through microcavity - engineered plasmonic resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 233901 (2017)

2017
[30]

& Martín-Cano, D

Gurlek, B., Sandoghdar, V. & Martín-Cano, D. Manipulation of quenching in nanoantenna–emitter systems enabled by external detuned cavities: a path to enhance strong-coupling. ACS Photonics, 5, 456−461 (2018)

2018
[31]

Doeleman, H. M. , Verhagen, E. & Koenderink, A. F. Antenna–cavity hybrids: matching polar opposites for Purcell enhancements at any linewidth . ACS Photonics 3, 1943−1951 (2016)

1943
[32]

Wang, P. et al. Single -band 2- nm-line-width plasmon resonance in a strongly coupled Au nanorod. Nano Lett. 15, 7581−7586 (2015)

2015
[33]

Thakkar, N. et al. Sculpting fano resonances to control photonic –plasmonic hybridization. Nano Lett. 17, 6927−6934 (2017)

2017
[34]

K., Gordon, R

Dezfouli, M. K., Gordon, R. & Hughes, S. Modal theory of modified spontaneous emission of a quantum emitter in a hybrid plasmonic photonic -crystal cavity system. Phys. Rev. A 95, 013846 (2017)

2017
[35]

Franke, S. et al. Quantization of quasinormal modes for open cavities and plasmonic cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 213901 (2019)

2019
[36]

Qian, Z. et al. Absorption reduction of large purcell enhancement enabled by topological state-led mode coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023901 (2021)

2021
[37]

Barth, M. et al. Nanoassembled plasmonic -photonic hybrid cavity for tailored light-matter coupling. Nano Lett. 10, 891–895 (2010)

2010
[38]

M., Dieleman, C

Doeleman, H. M., Dieleman, C. D., Mennes, C., Ehrler, B. & Koenderink, A. F. Observation of cooperative purcell enhancements in antenna–cavity hybrids. ACS 20 Nano 14, 12027−12036 (2020)

2020
[39]

Y., Liu, Y

Zhang, H. Y., Liu, Y. C., Wang, C. Y., Zhang, N. E. & Lu, C. C. Hybrid photonic- plasmonic nano-cavity with ultra-high Q/V. Opt. Lett. 45. 4794 (2020)

2020
[40]

–N., Huang, Q., Liu K

Liu, J. –N., Huang, Q., Liu K. –K., Singamaneni , S. & Cunningham, B. T. Nanoantenna–Microcavity Hybrids with Highly Cooperative Plasmonic –Photonic Coupling. Nano Lett. 17, 7569−7577 (2017)

2017
[41]

Huang, Q. et al. Nanoantenna –Microcavity Hybrids with Highly Cooperative Plasmonic–Photonic Coupling. ACS Photonics 7, 1994−2001 (2020)

1994
[42]

Li, W. et al. Highly efficient single-exciton strong coupling with p lasmons by lowering critical interaction strength at an e xceptional point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 143601 (2023)

2023
[43]

Zhou, N. et al. Strong mode coupling-enabled hybrid photon-plasmon laser with a microfiber-coupled nanorod. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn2026 (2022)

2022
[44]

Liu, J. et al. Reshaping plasmon modes by film interference . Sci. China- Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 114211 (2023)

2023
[45]

B., Akselrod, G

Hoang, T. B., Akselrod, G. M. & Mikkelsen, M. H. Ultrafast room-temperature single photon emission from quantum dots coupled to plasmonic nanocavities . Nano Lett. 16, 270 (2016)

2016
[46]

Andersen, S. K. H., Kumar, S. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Ultrabright linearly polarized photon generation from a nitrogen vacancy center in a nanocube dimer antenna . Nano Lett. 17, 3889 (2017)

2017
[47]

Mejía-Salazar, J. R. & Oliveira Jr, O. N. Plasmonic biosensing: Focus review . Chem. Rev. 118, 10617−10625 (2018)

2018
[48]

Yan, R. et al. Highly sensitive plasmonic nanorod hyperbolic metamaterial biosensor. Photon. Res. 10, 84-95 (2022)

2022
[49]

Liu, J. et al. A solid -state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability. Nature Nanotech. 14, 586–593 (2019)

2019
[50]

Liu, R., Liao, Z., Yu, Y. -C. & X. -H. Wang, Relativity and diversity of strong coupling in coupled plasmon-exciton systems. Phys. Rev. B 103, 235430 (2021). 21

2021
[51]

Chen, G. Y. et al. Ab initio determination of local coupling interaction in arbitrary nanostructures: Application to photonic crystal slabs and cavities. Phys. Rev. B 87, 195138 (2013)

2013
[52]

Zubarev, D. N. Double -time Green functions in statistical physics . Soviet. Phys. Usp. 3, 320–345 (1960)

1960
[53]

Du, R. et al. How to obtain the correct Rabi splitting in a subwavelength interacting system. Nano Lett. 23, 444–450 (2023)

2023
[54]

& Hecht, B

Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics. Cambridge University Press, 2012, ISBN: 9781139551793

2012
[55]

Moerner, W. E. & Bjorklund, G. C. Persistent spectral hole- burning: science and applications, Springer, Vol. 1 (1988)

1988
[56]

Putz, S. et al. Spectral hole burning and its application in microwave photonics . Nat. Photonics 11, 36–39 (2017)

2017
[57]

You, J. -B. et al. Suppressing decoherence in quantum plasmonic systems by the spectral-hole-burning effect. Phys. Rev. A 103, 053517 (2021)

2021
[58]

Zhou, W. -J. et al. Cavity spectral -hole-burning to boost coherence in plasmon - emitter strong coupling systems. Nanotechnology 33, 475001 (2022)

2022
[59]

Fu, Enhanced light –matter interaction with Bloch surface wave modulated plasmonic nanocavities

B. Fu, Enhanced light –matter interaction with Bloch surface wave modulated plasmonic nanocavities. Nano Lett. 25, 722−729 (2025)

2025
[60]

Liu, R. et al. Deterministic positioning and alignment of a single-molecule exciton in plasmonic nanodimer for strong coupling. Nat. Commun. 15, 4103 (2024)

2024
[61]

Liu, R. et al. On -demand shape and size purification of nanoparticle based on surface area. Nanoscale 6, 13145-13153 (2014)

2014
[62]

Chikkaraddy, R. et al. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535, 127–130 (2016)

2016
[63]

Zengin, M

G. Zengin, M. Wersäll, S. Nilsson, T. J. Antosiewicz, M. Käll, and T. Shegai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157401(2015)

2015
[64]

Ruppin, Electromagnetic energy density in a dispersive and absorptive material

R. Ruppin, Electromagnetic energy density in a dispersive and absorptive material . Phys. Lett. A 299, 309-312 (2002)

2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

& Barnes, W

Törmä, P. & Barnes, W. L. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 013901 (2015)

work page 2015

[2] [2]

Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010)

2010

[3] [3]

Haffner, C. et al. Low-loss plasmon- assisted electro -optic modulator . Nature 556, 483–486 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Guo, X. et al. Efficient all-optical plasmonic modulators with atomically thin Van Der Waals heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907105 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Brolo, A. G. Plasmonics for future biosensors. Nat. Photonics 6, 709–713 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Rodrigo, O. et al. Mid-infrared plasmonic biosensing with graphene . Science 349, 165–168 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Kauranen and A

M. Kauranen and A. V. Zayats, Nat. Photonics 6, 737–748 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

P., Shi, X., Dichtl, P., Maier, S

Nielsen, M. P., Shi, X., Dichtl, P., Maier, S. A. & Oulton, R. F. Giant nonlinear response at a plasmonic nanofocus drives efficient four -wave mixing . Science 358,1179-1181 (2017)

work page 2017