REVIEW 1 cited by
The Betti side of the double shuffle theory. I. The harmonic coproducts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper is the first in a series which aims at: (a) giving a proof that the associator relations between multizeta values imply the double shuffle and regularization (DSR) ones, alternative to that of the second-named author's 2010 paper; (b) enhancing Racinet's construction of a torsor structure over the Q-scheme of DSR relations to an explicit bitorsor structure. In this paper, we revisit Racinet's original DSR formalism, whose main character is an algebra coproduct, called the harmonic coproduct, and we introduce a variant which is a module coproduct; we explain the `de Rham' nature of this formalism and construct a `Betti' counterpart of it; we show how both formalisms can be interpreted in terms of geometry, following the ideas of Deligne and Terasoma's unfinished 2005 preprint; we use Bar-Natan's interpretation of associators as functors from the category of parenthesized braids to that of chord diagrams to show that any associator relates the Betti and de Rham geometric objects, both in the `algebraic' and in the `module' setups; we derive that any associator relates the Betti and de Rham algebra coproducts, as well as their module counterparts. These results will be used in the next parts of the series.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Betti side of the double shuffle theory. III. Bitorsor structures
An explicit bitorsor structure is constructed on the double shuffle torsor, with right-acting Betti group DMR_B(k) whose discrete analogue is {±1} and whose pro-p version fits a Cartesian diagram with GT_p.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.