Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extended Insertion Functions for Opacity Enforcement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.04268 v1 pith:GGFDG5RX submitted 2020-05-08 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords opacitysysteminsertionoutputactualbeforemechanismssymbols
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Opacity is a confidentiality property that holds when certain secret strings of a given system cannot be revealed to an outside observer under any system activity. Opacity violations stimulate the study of opacity enforcement strategies. Among other methodologies, opacity has been enforced using insertion mechanisms, i.e., output obfuscation mechanisms that are allowed to insert fictitious output symbols before actual system outputs, in order to preserve opacity. This paper studies and analyzes more powerful extended insertion mechanisms, which can insert symbols before and after an actual system output, thus, providing opacity to a wider class of systems. In order to address practical considerations, the paper also introduces event insertion constraints (i.e., the case when only specific symbols can be inserted before and/or after an actual system output). For each case, we construct an appropriate verifier that can be used to obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for checking opacity enforceability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vision-Language Models for Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of lightweight vision-language models for edge deployment, marred by citation errors, self-citation, and a lack of selection methodology.

Pith tools