Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

ALMA Observations of Molecular Complexity in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Probing the Star-forming Region N160

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read ALMA observations identify N160A-mmA as a bona fide hot core in the Large Magellanic Cloud, the eighth found in the LMC.

desk verdict A credible new LMC hot core detection that grows a very small sample; the temperature evidence is solid, but the density criterion is soft and the LTE/optically-thin assumptions are untested for the hot source. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20951 v1 pith:GIUBRFUY submitted 2025-06-26 astro-ph.GA

Amanda Broadmeadow (University of Maryland College Park) , Marta Sewi{l}o (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , University of Maryland College Park) , Lee Mundy (University of Maryland College Park) , Roya Hamedani Golshan (I. Physikalisches Institut der Universität zu Köln) , Kazuki Tokuda (Kyushu University , Kagawa University) , Thomas Möller (I. Physikalisches Institut der Universität zu Köln)
show 7 more authors
Remy Indebetouw (University of Virginia National Radio Astronomy Observatory) Joana M. Oliveira (Keele University) Steven B. Charnley (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) Jennifer Wiseman (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) Naoto Harada (The University of Tokyo) Peter Schilke (I. Physikalisches Institut der Universität zu Köln)
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords hotcoreLargeMagellanicCloudcomplexorganicmoleculesmethanolmethylcyanideALMAXCLASSstarformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports ALMA 1.2 mm observations of the star-forming region N160 in the Large Magellanic Cloud and claims that its brightest continuum source, N160A-mmA, is a bona fide hot core: a compact, hot, dense knot around a massive protostar. The evidence is a deconvolved size of 0.09 pc, rotational temperatures above 100 K inferred for methanol (188 K) and sulfur dioxide (178 K), an H2 number density of 6.3e5 $cm^{-3}$, and detections of the complex organic molecules methanol and methyl cyanide. If correct, this is the eighth hot core found in the LMC and the tenth outside the Milky Way, expanding the small sample needed to test how complex organic molecules form at low metallicity. The paper also shows that three other continuum sources in the field are cold cores, and compares abundances with known Galactic and Magellanic hot cores, finding that N160A-mmA fits the existing abundance trends.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is rotational diagram analysis combined with full spectral modeling in XCLASS. Rotational diagrams assume the observed lines are optically thin and in local thermodynamic equilibrium, allowing a fit of ln(N_u/g_u) versus E_u/k to yield a rotational temperature and total column density. XCLASS then fits the full spectra with radiative-transfer models, using the rotational diagram results as initial estimates, and Monte Carlo noise resampling provides parameter uncertainties. H2 column densities are derived from dust continuum at 870 um and 1.2 mm using the Kauffmann et al. (2008) relation, with gas-to-dust scaling appropriate for the LMC, and deconvolved source sizes are computed from the 50%-peak continuum contours.

What would settle it

Measure the 13CH3OH or CH318OH isotopologue lines for the same methanol transitions toward N160A-mmA; if the optical-depth-corrected rotational temperature falls below 100 K, the hot-core classification would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that N160A-mmA, the brightest of six 1.2 mm continuum sources in the ALMA field N160A-mm, is a bona fide hot core. This classification rests on three measured properties: a deconvolved source size of 0.09 pc, an H2 number density of 6.3e5 $cm^{-3}$, and rotational temperatures above 100 K for both CH3OH (188 K) and SO2 (178 K) as determined through rotational diagram analysis and XCLASS spectral modeling. The detection of the complex organic molecules CH3OH and CH3CN, together with a chemically rich spectrum including SO2, SO, H13CN, SiO, and other species commonly seen in Galactic hot cores, supports the identification. The authors further report that this hot core is associated with an ultracompact H II region, water/methanol/OH masers, and a hub-filament system, and they place its molecular abundances in the context of the seven previously known LMC hot cores and two SMC hot cores.

Load-bearing premise

The hot-core classification depends on the assumption that the methanol and sulfur dioxide lines are optically thin and that the gas is in local thermodynamic equilibrium, so the derived rotational temperatures reflect the true gas temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The number of known extragalactic hot cores rises to ten (eight in the LMC, two in the SMC), giving a slightly larger sample for studying complex organic molecule formation at sub-solar metallicity.
  • N160A-mmA is the first hot core with COMs found outside the LMC's stellar bar, in the molecular ridge thought to be affected by the LMC-SMC tidal interaction, offering a concrete test of the idea that infalling low-metallicity gas suppresses methanol production.
  • The paper's abundance comparisons show that CH3OH varies by more than an order of magnitude across LMC/SMC hot cores while SO2 and SO vary much less, reinforcing the interpretation that methanol forms on grains in the cold prestellar phase and is sensitive to prior environmental conditions.
  • The three cold cores in the field (C, D, and E) show methanol at temperatures below 30 K, indicating non-thermal desorption mechanisms or low-binding-energy surface sites must be releasing methanol into the gas.
  • The kinematic complexity and broad lines toward N160A-mmA, along with its position at intersecting filaments, suggest that the hot core is the most massive member of a protocluster forming at a hub-filament junction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The CH3CN rotational temperature (84 K) is substantially lower than the CH3OH temperature (188 K); if confirmed with additional transitions, this could indicate sub-thermal excitation or a separate cooler gas component, and high-resolution observations of more CH3CN lines would test whether the chemistry is fully thermalized in the hot core.
  • The H2 number density of 6.3e5 cm^-3 is below the canonical 10^6 cm^-3 hot-core threshold; accepting this classification would either require relaxing that criterion at low metallicity or suggest that the density estimate is diluted by the beam, a testable distinction with higher-resolution observations.
  • The tentative HDO detection, if confirmed, would make N160A-mmA the third extragalactic hot core with deuterated water; a deeper integration targeting multiple HDO lines could validate this rare signature.
  • The filament-hub morphology around the hot core invites a kinematic study of infall and outflow; measuring velocity gradients along the filaments could test whether the protocluster formed by filament convergence, as the paper suggests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports ALMA Band 6 (about 1.2 mm) continuum and molecular line observations of the LMC star-forming region N160, targeting the field N160A-mm. Six continuum sources are identified; CH3OH is detected toward four of them and CH3CN toward the brightest source, N160A-mmA. Rotational-diagram analysis (Eqs. 1-2) and XCLASS spectral modeling are used to derive rotational temperatures and column densities. The authors report T_rot(CH3OH)=188 K and T_rot(SO2)=178 K for source A, a deconvolved size of 0.09 pc, and n_H2=6.3e5 cm^-3, and on this basis classify N160A-mmA as a bona fide hot core, the eighth in the LMC. The paper then compares molecular abundances with previously known Magellanic and Galactic hot cores and discusses the environmental implications.

Significance. If the hot-core identification is secure, the result is significant: it expands the very small extragalactic hot-core sample, adds a source outside the LMC bar in the tidally affected Molecular Ridge, and provides abundance trends (large CH3OH scatter, smaller SO/SO2 scatter) that can be tested by astrochemical models. The paper has clear strengths: explicit line-detection criteria with tentative detections flagged, transparent rotational diagrams with uncertainties, Monte Carlo error propagation for the XCLASS fits, and careful use of archival multi-wavelength data including masers, radio continuum, Spitzer, and KMOS. The principal weakness is that the >100 K temperature classification rests on LTE and optically thin assumptions that are not independently verified for source A, while the reported H2 density is below the formal hot-core threshold; these points need to be addressed before the 'bona fide' label is fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2.3, Eqs. (1)-(2), Figure 9] The hot-core identification rests on T_rot > 100 K for CH3OH and SO2, but the rotational diagrams assume LTE and optically thin lines, as stated in Section 3.2.3. The text itself excludes three SO2 transitions 'to avoid possible opacity effects' because they are strong low-E transitions, which shows that opacity is a live concern. If the bright low-E CH3OH lines are also optically thick, the rotational diagram is flattened and T_rot can be overestimated, potentially pushing a genuinely colder core above the 100 K threshold. Non-LTE XCLASS/RADEX modeling was applied only to sources C, D, and E; for source A the fits are LTE with the source assumed beam filling (Section 3.2.4). I request that the authors report the line optical depths from the XCLASS fits, run non-LTE radiative transfer for CH3OH and SO2 toward source A, or otherwise demonstrate that T_rot remains above 100 K when strong low-E lines are excluded and when the beam-filling assumption is relaxed. Without such a test, the central >100 K claim is not fully supported.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (4), Table 4] The reported H2 number density for source A is 6.3e5 cm^-3, below the >=1e6 cm^-3 threshold given in the Introduction for a hot core. This value also depends on adopting T_d = T_rot(CH3OH) in Eq. (4); if the methanol temperature is biased high by optical-depth effects, n_H2 is also overestimated. The classification therefore rests almost entirely on the temperature argument. I ask the authors to either justify a relaxed density threshold, derive n_H2 from an independent tracer, or present the density as a supporting indicator with its uncertainty rather than as a criterion that is formally met.
  3. [Section 3.2.4, Table 5] The CH3CN detections are flagged as tentative in Table 2, and the XCLASS temperature for CH3CN is 83.6 +/- 19.2 K, below 100 K. The abstract and summary list CH3CN as a detected COM supporting the hot-core classification. This is not fatal because CH3OH is the primary hot-temperature tracer, but the text should avoid presenting CH3CN as an independent hot-core tracer; the tentative nature and the sub-100 K fitted temperature should be acknowledged in the summary statements where CH3CN is cited.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 5] The upper limits for C2H5CN and C2H5OH toward source A are listed as <5e8 cm^-2, which is implausibly low for these species and inconsistent with the other COM upper limits in the same table; please check these values and their corresponding abundance upper limits.
  2. [Section 3.2.4, Table 5] For source E, the non-LTE fit gives a collision partner density of 4.5e8 cm^-3, about three orders of magnitude higher than the density estimated from N(H2)/size for the same source; this inconsistency should be discussed or the fit revisited.
  3. [Figure 9] The SO2 rotational diagram already marks the three excluded opacity-affected transitions; it would be informative to show the CH3OH fit with the low-Eu (35-60 K) lines removed as well, to demonstrate that the >100 K result is not driven by optically thick low-excitation lines.
  4. [Section 4.3, Figures 15-16] The abundance comparison uses a single multiplicative metallicity scaling (factors of 2 and 5 for the LMC and SMC), and the Galactic comparison points come from single-dish observations. The text acknowledges the scaling is simple, but a sentence noting that the inferred abundance differences between galaxies could partly reflect this scaling and the different angular scales would help the reader calibrate the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the hot-core identification is a direct fit of ALMA spectra and continuum, not a reduction to prior results or to the classification criterion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that N160A-mm A is a hot core because its measured rotational temperatures (CH3OH at 188 K, SO2 at 178 K from XCLASS; CH3OH at 170±5 K and SO2 at 127±14 K from rotational diagrams, Figure 9), deconvolved size (0.09 pc), and H2 number density (6.3e5 cm^-3) satisfy the literature definition of a hot core. The temperatures are fitted from observed line intensities via the standard rotational-diagram equations (Eqs. 1-2, Section 3.2.3) and independently cross-checked with XCLASS spectral modeling (Section 3.2.4); they are measurements, not predictions derived from the hot-core label. The H2 column density (Eq. 4, Section 3.3) adopts T_rot(CH3OH) as the dust temperature, but this does not force the hot-core conclusion: a lower assumed temperature would increase, not decrease, N(H2) and hence n_H2, so the density support is conservative. The abundance comparisons (Figures 13-16) are observational trends using fitted column densities, not tests of a theory derived from the same fitted values. The paper's self-citations to XCLASS (Möller et al. 2017, 2023; Sewiło et al. 2023) and to previous LMC hot-core surveys provide the fitting tool and comparison sample; they do not supply the measured temperatures or column densities. The private XCLASS extension note is a minor self-reference but is not load-bearing for the hot-core classification, which rests on the independently computed rotational diagrams. Finally, the LTE and optically-thin assumption stated in Section 3.2.3 is an untested modeling assumption and a legitimate correctness risk, but it is not a circular step: the paper does not define the data or the classification in terms of each other. No step in the derivation reduces to its own input or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The hot core classification and abundance analysis rest on standard radiative transfer and dust assumptions taken from prior literature (LTE, optically thin lines, dust-gas coupling, dust opacity, gas-to-dust ratio) plus an in-paper geometric assumption (beam filling) for XCLASS. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • T_rot(CH3OH) for source A = 188.36 ± 5.48 K (XCLASS); 170 ± 5 K (rotational diagram)
    Key evidence for hot core: exceeds 100 K. Fitted in XCLASS and rotational diagram (Section 3.2.3, Table 5).
  • T_rot(SO2) for source A = 178.16 ± 6.71 K (XCLASS); 127 ± 14 K (rotational diagram)
    Second temperature above 100 K supporting the hot core classification. Three low-Eu lines excluded for opacity (Section 3.2.3).
  • N(CH3OH) for source A = (2.51 ± 0.12) × 10^15 cm^-2
    Methanol column density used for abundance comparison with other hot cores (Table 5).
  • n(H2) collision partner density, source C = 5.8 × 10^6 cm^-3
    Fitted in non-LTE XCLASS model for cold CH3OH (Table 5 note b).
  • n(H2) collision partner density, source D = 3.9 × 10^6 cm^-3
    Fitted in non-LTE XCLASS model for cold CH3OH (Table 5 note b).
  • n(H2) collision partner density, source E = 4.5 × 10^8 cm^-3
    Fitted in non-LTE XCLASS model for source E; about 100 times higher than sources C and D (Table 5 note b).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTE and optically thin emission for rotational diagram analysis
    Section 3.2.3 states: 'The rotational diagram analysis assumes that the gas is in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) and that the lines are optically thin.' This underpins Eq. 1 and 2.
  • domain assumption Dust and gas temperatures are well coupled (T_d ~ T_g ~ T_rot(CH3OH))
    Section 3.3: 'Assuming that the dust and gas are well-coupled such that T_d ~ T_g ~ T, we adopt the CH3OH rotational temperature as the dust temperature in Eq. 4.' This assumption is used to derive N(H2).
  • domain assumption 870 micron continuum is dominated by dust thermal emission with negligible free-free contamination
    Section 3.3: 'At this wavelength, it is expected that the total continuum emission is from dust thermal emission, with little to no contribution from the free-free emission.' This matters for source A, which hosts a UC HII region.
  • domain assumption Dust opacity model of Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) and LMC gas-to-dust ratio 316 from Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2014)
    Section 3.3: 'The dust opacity per unit mass for 870 μm was taken from Ossenkopf & Henning (1994)... This gives a gas-to-dust mass ratio estimate of 316 for the LMC.' These values set the H2 column scale.
  • ad hoc to paper Source is beam filling in single-component XCLASS fits to break size-column degeneracy
    Section 3.2.4: 'Due to a degeneracy between source size and column density, we assume that the source is beam filling when a single component is present.' This modeling choice affects all fitted column densities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ALMA Observations of Molecular Complexity in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Probing the Star-forming Region N160." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GIUBRFUY

@misc{pith2026250620951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ALMA Observations of Molecular Complexity in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Probing the Star-forming Region N160},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GIUBRFUY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20951}
}
abstract

Hot cores are small ($\lesssim$0.1 pc), dense ($\geq$10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$), and hot ($>$100 K) regions around massive protostars and are one of the main production sites of complex organic molecules (COMs, $\geq6$ atoms, including carbon). The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is an ideal place to study hot core and COM formation in an environment that is different from our Galaxy, though prior to this study there have only been nine detections of extragalactic hot cores (seven in the LMC and two in the Small Magellanic Cloud, SMC). Here, we report 1.2 mm continuum and molecular line observations with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in the star-forming region N160 that we named N160A-mm. We identify six 1.2 mm continuum sources, four of which are associated with methanol (CH$_3$OH) emission. Another COM, methyl cyanide (CH$_3$CN) is associated with the brightest source, N160A-mmA, the most chemically rich source in the field. Using the XCLASS software, we perform spectral modeling to estimate rotational temperatures and total column densities of detected molecular species for four sources. Based on the temperature exceeding 100 K, small size, and high H$_2$ number density, we identify N160A-mmA as a hot core. We compare the molecular abundances of this newly detected hot core with those previously detected in the LMC and SMC, as well as with a sample of Galactic hot cores, and discuss the complex nature of N160A-mmA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20951 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Upper panel: Three-color mosaic of the star-forming region N 160 combining the Hα image from the MCELS survey (red; ∼2 ′′ resolution, Smith & MCELS Team 1998), the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) 8.6 GHz / 3 cm image (green; a half-power beam width, HPBW, of ∼1.′′5, Indebetouw et al. 2004), and the Atacama Compact Array (ACA) 12CO (2–1) image (blue; HPBW=7′′, Tarantino et al., in prep.). The dashed green bo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Three-color mosaic of the star-forming region N 160, combining the Spitzer/IRAC 8.0 µm (red) and 4.5 µm (green) images from the SAGE survey (Meixner et al. 2006), and the MCELS Hα image (blue; Smith & MCELS Team 1998). The ALMA field N 160A–mm is shown as the white circle and labeled. The 8.0 µm emission traces hot dust and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), while the 4.5 µm and Hα emission traces stars and th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The 1.2 mm continuum image of the ALMA field N 160A–mm. No continuum or molecular line emission was detected outside the shown field of view. Contours represent 3σ, 10σ, and 100σ where σ is the continuum image rms of 1.01 × 10−4 Jy beam−1 . The white box shows the field of view for the moment maps in Figures 6-7. The blue stars show the locations of Spitzer-identified massive YSOs while the red triangle shows the lo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ALMA spectra of N 160A–mm A for spectral windows 242 GHz and 245 GHz. The spectra are extracted as the mean intensity of the area enclosed by the 50% contour of the peak continuum emission of source A. The red solid line shows the observed spectrum and the solid black …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: ALMA spectra of N 160A–mm A for spectral windows 258 GHz and 260 GHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Integrated intensity maps of all COMs detected toward N 160A–mm. This includes CH3OH and CH3CN emission. Contours represent 1%, 5%, and 20% of 1.2mm continuum peak intensity. The methanol emission in the first panel was created using the 5−0,5–4−0,4 E, 51,5–41,4 E, 50,…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Integrated intensity maps of N 160A–mm for brightest lines detected toward multiple sources (SO2, CS, SO, H13CO+, H2CS, H13CN, SiO, HC15N, and C33S). The SO2 map in the first panel was created using the single transition 52,4–41,3. The SO2 map in the second panel was c…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Integrated intensity maps for molecular species (33SO, 34SO2, OCS) and the H36β recombination line detected toward source A only. The 33SO emission was created using the four blended transitions 67,6–56,5, 67,7–56,6, 67,8–56,7, and 67,9–56,8. The 34SO2 map was created …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Upper panel: Rotational diagrams for source A for methanol and SO2. Rotational temperatures above 100 K indicate the presence of a hot core. The open circle in the CH3OH plot is a tentative detection and was not included in the fit. The three pale squared markers in th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The CS velocity (moment 1) map of N 160A–mm A–E and the CH3OH velocity map zoomed in on N 160A–mm A. The 1.2 mm contours are overlaid with contour levels the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Three-color images of N 160A–mm combining the VMC Ks (red), J (green), and Y (blue) images in the left panel, and the SAGE Spitzer/IRAC 8.0 µm (red), 4.5 µm (green), and 3.6 µm (blue) images in the right panel. The field of view in both images is the same. The 1.2 mm …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Three-color image of N 160A–mm A combining the SAGE Spitzer/IRAC 8.0 µm (red), 4.5 µm (green), and the VMC Ks band (blue) images. The white contours are the 1.2 mm continuum emission with contour levels of 1%, 5%, and 20% of the continuum peak of 15.3 mJy beam−1 . The…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of molecular abundances of species detected toward all sources analyzed with XCLASS: CH3OH, SO, CS, and H13CO+. The CH3OH abundance for source A was measured assuming LTE; non-LTE conditions were assumed for sources C, D, and E. alone and across the entire …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of molecular abundances between N 160A–mm A, C, D, and E. Bars with hatch marks indicate upper limits. The SO2 abundance for source A is from the hot component. The hot core N 160A–mm A features the highest abundances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of metallicity-scaled molecular abundances in known hot cores in the LMC (ST11 (Shimonishi et al. 2016b), N 113 A1 and B3 (Sewi lo et al. 2018), ST16 (Shimonishi et al. 2020), N 105–2 A and 2 B (Sewi lo et al. 2022a), N 132-14A (Hamedani Golshan et al. 2024…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison of metallicity scaled molecular abundances of LMC and SMC hot cores with a sample of Galactic hot cores (Orion (Sutton et al. 1995) and (Blake et al. 1987), W3(H2O) (Helmich & van Dishoeck 1997), Sgr B2(N) (Nummelin et al. 2000)). Upper limits are shown wit…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chemistry of Dark Molecular Clouds

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review arguing that the chemically rich cores TMC-1 CP and L1544 are representative molecular-cloud laboratories, and that complex organic molecule production is largely insensitive to metallicity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 82

    Bariosco, V., Tinacci, L., Pantaleone, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 82

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    2007, PASA, 24, 21

    Bekki, K., & Chiba, M. 2007, PASA, 24, 21

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    A., Sutton, E

    Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, ApJ, 315, 621

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    J., & Whiteoak, J

    Brooks, K. J., & Whiteoak, J. B. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 395

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    K., Tumlinson, J., & Shull, J

    Browning, M. K., Tumlinson, J., & Shull, J. M. 2003, ApJ, 582, 810

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    2004, AJ, 128, 1294 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Brice˜ no, C., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1294 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Caswell, J. L. 1995, MNRAS, 272, L31

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    L., & Haynes, R

    Caswell, J. L., & Haynes, R. F. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 33

    work page 1981

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    J., & Tielens, A

    Ceccarelli, C., Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1996, ApJ, 471, 400

    1996

  2. [10]

    S., Allen, D., et al

    Churchwell, E., Povich, M. S., Allen, D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 759

    2006

  3. [11]

    L., Clementini, G., Girardi, L., et al

    Cioni, M.-R. L., Clementini, G., Girardi, L., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A116

    2011

  4. [12]

    S., Dame, T

    Cohen, R. S., Dame, T. M., Garay, G., et al. 1988, ApJL, 331, L95

    1988

  5. [13]

    D., et al

    Deharveng, L., Schuller, F., Anderson, L. D., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A6

    2010

  6. [14]

    Ehrenfreund, P., & Charnley, S. B. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 427

    2000

  7. [15]

    Fuller, G. A. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 779

    2010

  8. [16]

    A., & Sevre, F

    Epchtein, N., Braz, M. A., & Sevre, F. 1984, A&A, 140, 67

    1984

  9. [17]

    1990, PASJ, 42, 505

    Fujimoto, M., & Noguchi, M. 1990, PASJ, 42, 505

    1990

  10. [18]

    2017, PASJ, 69, L5

    Fukui, Y., Tsuge, K., Sano, H., et al. 2017, PASJ, 69, L5

    2017

  11. [19]

    1999, PASJ, 51, 745

    Fukui, Y., Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 745

    1999

  12. [20]

    2019, ApJ, 886, 14

    Fukui, Y., Tokuda, K., Saigo, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 14

    2019

  13. [21]

    F., & Whiteoak, J

    Gardner, F. F., & Whiteoak, J. B. 1985, MNRAS, 215, 103

    1985

  14. [22]

    F., & Langer, W

    Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1978, ApJ, 222, 881 —. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209

    1978

  15. [23]

    A., Caswell, J

    Green, J. A., Caswell, J. L., Fuller, G. A., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 948

    2008

  16. [24]

    A., & Chu, Y

    Gruendl, R. A., & Chu, Y. 2009, ApJS, 184, 172 Hamedani Golshan, R., S´ anchez-Monge,´A., Schilke, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A3

    2009

  17. [25]

    P., & van Dishoeck, E

    Helmich, F. P., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1997, A&AS, 124, 205

    1997

  18. [26]

    Henize, K. G. 1956, ApJS, 2, 315

    1956

  19. [27]

    Herbst, E., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427

    2009

  20. [28]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

    1983

  21. [29]

    R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C

    Hunter, T. R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 074501

    2023

  22. [30]

    E., & Conti, P

    Indebetouw, R., Johnson, K. E., & Conti, P. 2004, AJ, 128, 2206

    2004

  23. [31]

    C., Woods, P

    Jones, O. C., Woods, P. M., Kemper, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3250

    2017

  24. [32]

    J., Hyland, A

    Jones, T. J., Hyland, A. R., Straw, S., et al. 1986, MNRAS, 219, 603 Jørgensen, J. K., Belloche, A., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 727

    1986

  25. [33]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, N. J., I., & Lee, C. W. 2008, A&A, 487, 993

    2008

  26. [34]

    J., Hollenbach, D

    Kaufman, M. J., Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1998, ApJ, 497, 276

    1998

  27. [35]

    W., & Rosolowsky, E

    Koch, E. W., & Rosolowsky, E. W. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3435

    2015

  28. [36]

    1984, in Structure and Evolution of the Magellanic Clouds, ed

    Koornneef, J. 1984, in Structure and Evolution of the Magellanic Clouds, ed. S. van den Bergh & K. S. D. de

    1984

  29. [37]

    Walmsley, C. M. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 299

    2000

  30. [38]

    S., Whiteoak, J

    Lazendic, J. S., Whiteoak, J. B., Klamer, I., Harbison, P. D., & Kuiper, T. B. H. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 969

    2002

  31. [39]

    Lucke, P. B. 1974, ApJS, 28, 73

    1974

  32. [40]

    B., & Hodge, P

    Lucke, P. B., & Hodge, P. W. 1970, AJ, 75, 171

    1970

  33. [41]

    1992, A&A, 263, 41

    Luks, T., & Rohlfs, K. 1992, A&A, 263, 41

    1992

  34. [42]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 415

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415

    2014

  35. [43]

    Martins, F., Schaerer, D., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, A&A, 436, 1049

    2005

  36. [44]

    S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K

    Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425

    1977

  37. [45]

    2002, A&A, 393, 809

    Mehlert, D., Noll, S., Appenzeller, I., et al. 2002, A&A, 393, 809

    2002

  38. [46]

    D., Indebetouw, R., et al

    Meixner, M., Gordon, K. D., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2268

    2006

  39. [47]

    2013, AJ, 146, 62

    Meixner, M., Panuzzo, P., Roman-Duval, J., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 62

    2013

  40. [48]

    2001, PASJ, 53, L45 M¨ oller, T., Endres, C., & Schilke, P

    Mizuno, N., Rubio, M., Mizuno, A., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, L45 M¨ oller, T., Endres, C., & Schilke, P. 2017, A&A, 598, A7 M¨ oller, T., Schilke, P., S´ anchez-Monge,´A., Schmiedeke, A., & Meng, F. 2023, A&A, 676, A121 M¨ uller, H. S. P., Schl¨ oder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewiss...

    2001

  41. [49]

    J., & Charnley, S

    Mumma, M. J., & Charnley, S. B. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 471

    2011

  42. [50]

    2000, ApJS, 128, 213

    Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, ˚A., et al. 2000, ApJS, 128, 213

    2000

  43. [51]

    Oberg, K. I. 2016, Chem. Rev., 116, 17, 9631–9663

    2016

  44. [52]

    1994, A&A, 291, 943

    Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943

    1994

  45. [53]

    M., et al

    Palau, A., Fuente, A., Girart, J. M., et al. 2011, ApJL, 743, L32 Hot Cores in the LMC49

    2011

  46. [54]

    C., Fall, S

    Pei, Y. C., Fall, S. M., & Hauser, M. G. 1999, ApJ, 522, 604

    1999

  47. [55]

    M., Poynter, R

    Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, JQSRT, 60, 883 Pietrzy´ nski, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A., et al. 2019, Nature, 567, 200 R´ emy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A31

    1998

  48. [56]

    2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python, , , ascl:1208.017

    Robitaille, T., & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python, , , ascl:1208.017

    2012

  49. [57]

    Rolleston, W. R. J., Trundle, C., & Dufton, P. L. 2002, A&A, 396, 53

    2002

  50. [58]

    D., Meixner, M., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Gordon, K. D., Meixner, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 86

    2014

  51. [59]

    C., & Dopita, M

    Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A. 1992, ApJ, 384, 508 SAGE Team. 2006, Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy’s

    1992

  52. [60]

    https://catcopy.ipac.caltech.edu/dois/doi.php?id=10

    Evolution, IPAC, doi:10.26131/IRSA404. https://catcopy.ipac.caltech.edu/dois/doi.php?id=10. 26131/IRSA404

    doi

  53. [61]

    Flower, D. R. 1997, A&A, 321, 293

    1997

  54. [62]

    P., Looney, L

    Seale, J. P., Looney, L. W., Chu, Y.-H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 150 Sewi lo, M., Indebetouw, R., Charnley, S. B., et al. 2018, ApJL, 853, L19 Sewi lo, M., Charnley, S. B., Schilke, P., et al. 2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 10, 2088 Sewi lo, M., Cordiner, M., Charnley,...

    2009

  55. [63]

    2020, ApJ, 891, 164

    Shimonishi, T., Das, A., Sakai, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 891, 164

    2020

  56. [64]

    Shimonishi, T., Tanaka, K. E. I., Zhang, Y., & Furuya, K. 2023, ApJL, 946, L41

    2023

  57. [65]

    C., & MCELS Team

    Smith, R. C., & MCELS Team. 1998, PASA, 15, 163

    1998

  58. [66]

    C., Peng, R., Danchi, W

    Sutton, E. C., Peng, R., Danchi, W. C., et al. 1995, ApJS, 97, 455

    1995

  59. [67]

    2019, ApJ, 886, 15

    Tokuda, K., Fukui, Y., Harada, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 15

    2019

  60. [68]

    2022, ApJ, 933, 20

    Tokuda, K., Minami, T., Fukui, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 20

    2022

  61. [69]

    Tokuda, K., Harada, N., Tanaka, K. E. I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 52

    2023

  62. [70]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 44 van der Tak, F

    Tsuge, K., Sano, H., Tachihara, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 44 van der Tak, F. F. S. 2004, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 221, Star Formation at High Angular Resolution, ed. M. G

    2019

  63. [71]

    Jayawardhana, & T

    Burton, R. Jayawardhana, & T. L. Bourke, 59 van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Sch¨ oier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627 van Dishoeck, E. F. 2018, IAU Symposium, 332, 3 van Loon, J. T., Oliveira, J. M., Gordon, K. D., Sloan, G. C., & Engelbra...

    2007

  64. [72]

    2014, ApJL, 795, L2

    Vastel, C., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., & Bachiller, R. 2014, ApJL, 795, L2

    2014

  65. [73]

    L., Oliveira, J

    Ward, J. L., Oliveira, J. M., van Loon, J. T., & Sewi lo, M. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2345 —. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1512

    2016

  66. [74]

    E., Federman, S

    Welty, D. E., Federman, S. R., Gredel, R., Thorburn, J. A., & Lambert, D. L. 2006, ApJS, 165, 138

    2006

  67. [75]

    B., & Gardner, F

    Whiteoak, J. B., & Gardner, F. F. 1986, MNRAS, 222, 513

    1986

  68. [76]

    B., Wellington, K

    Whiteoak, J. B., Wellington, K. J., Jauncey, D. L., et al. 1983, MNRAS, 205, 275

    1983

  69. [77]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 522

    Yozin, C., & Bekki, K. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 522

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.