Market and Long Term Accounting Operational Performance

M. S. S. Rosa; P. R. B. Lustosa

arxiv: 1907.11719 · v1 · pith:GLZE3VU2new · submitted 2019-07-26 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Market and Long Term Accounting Operational Performance

M. S. S. Rosa , P. R. B. Lustosa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC

keywords value relevanceoperational performancestock marketBrazilaccounting informationpanel datalong-term performance

0 comments

The pith

The Brazilian stock market differentiates companies with high and low long-term operational performance based on accounting data, but does not fully distinguish high from medium performers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines whether the stock market in Brazil uses accounting information to identify companies with strong, average, or weak long-term operational performance. It builds an Index Performance Summary from profitability, sales changes, and debt levels over rolling five-year periods from 1996 to 2009. Using panel data regressions with fixed effects on 142 non-financial firms, it tests if market prices reflect these performance levels differently. The results indicate clear separation between high and low performers but incomplete separation involving medium performers. A sympathetic reader would care because it speaks to how well financial statements convey sustainable business quality to investors.

Core claim

After unifying profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness metrics into an Index Performance Summary across ten five-year windows, multiple regressions reveal that the Brazilian stock market differentiates companies of high and low long-term operational performance, but this distinction is not fully perceived between companies of high and medium operational performance.

What carries the argument

The Index Performance Summary, which synthesizes profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness metrics from five-year mobile windows to classify companies into high, medium, and low operational performance levels.

If this is right

If the claim holds, then long-term accounting aggregates carry value-relevant information for investors at the extremes of performance.
Market prices incorporate distinctions at the high-low boundary more reliably than distinctions involving medium performance.
Five-year windows provide a sufficient horizon for operational performance to influence stock valuation in this setting.
Individual accounting variables do not always behave as hypothesized when examined separately.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Investors may rely more on extreme signals than on fine-grained gradations when using accounting data.
Accounting standard setters could consider whether metrics that highlight high-low differences are more decision-useful.
Similar tests in other emerging markets could check whether the pattern is specific to Brazil's disclosure environment.

Load-bearing premise

That the constructed Index Performance Summary, formed by unifying profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness metrics across five-year windows, validly measures long-term operational performance and that any market differentiation observed in regressions reflects investor use of that information rather than omitted variables or data artifacts.

What would settle it

A re-run of the panel regressions using an alternative performance classification, such as one based solely on return on assets averaged over the same windows, that fails to produce the same pattern of differentiation between high-low but not high-medium groups.

read the original abstract

Following the value relevance literature, this study verifies whether the marketplace differentiates companies of high, medium, and low long-term operational performance, measured by accounting information on profitability, sales variation and indebtedness. The data comprises the Corporate Financial Statements disclosed during the period from 1996 to 2009 and stock prices of companies listed on the Sao Paulo Stock Exchange and Commodities and Futures Exchange - BM&FBOVESPA. The final sample is composed of 142 non-financial companies. Five year mobile windows were used, which resulted in ten five-year periods. After checking each company indices, the accounting variables were unified in an Index Performance Summary to synthesize the final performance for each five-year period, which allowed segregation in operational performance levels. Multiple regressions were performed using panel data techniques, fixed effects model and dummies variables, and then hypothesis tests were made. Regarding the explanatory power of each individual variable, the results show that not all behaviors are according to the research hypothesis and that the Brazilian stock market differentiates companies of high and low long-term operational performance. This distinction is not fully perceived between companies of high and medium operational performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Routine value-relevance test on Brazilian firms that rests on an unvalidated ad-hoc performance index.

read the letter

The paper tests whether Brazilian stock prices distinguish firms by long-term operational performance drawn from accounting data. It constructs an Index Performance Summary that combines profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness over rolling five-year windows for 142 non-financial firms listed on BM&FBOVESPA from 1996 to 2009, then runs fixed-effects panel regressions with group dummies for high, medium, and low performers and conducts hypothesis tests on those dummies. The reported pattern is that the market separates high from low but does not fully separate high from medium. That is the entire contribution. The work applies existing value-relevance methods to a new market and a longer horizon; nothing in the setup or estimation is new. The sample and period are reasonable for the question, and the use of mobile windows plus fixed effects is standard and appropriate for the panel structure. The partial result on high versus low is at least consistent with the literature the authors cite. The central weakness is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. The Index Performance Summary is load-bearing: its construction rules, weighting, normalization, and the cutoffs that create the three groups are never shown to be robust to alternatives. No sensitivity checks appear for different aggregation methods, different percentile thresholds, or PCA-based alternatives. Because the regressions use dummies based on those groups, any arbitrary choice in the index can produce the observed differentiation without reflecting investor behavior. The abstract supplies no coefficient tables, standard errors, or variable definitions, so even the statistical support cannot be assessed directly. The data end in 2009, which limits current relevance but is secondary. This is a narrow empirical note for researchers already working on value relevance in emerging markets who might want one more data point. It does not reorganize theory or supply a replicable new relation. I would not send it to referees in its current form; the index construction needs documented robustness before any serious evaluation.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript tests whether the Brazilian stock market differentiates firms of high, medium, and low long-term operational performance using accounting metrics. For 142 non-financial BM&FBOVESPA-listed firms over 1996-2009, five-year rolling windows are used to compute profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness indices; these are unified into an Index Performance Summary that classifies firms into performance levels. Fixed-effects panel regressions with dummy variables for the three levels are estimated, followed by hypothesis tests. The central finding is that the market distinguishes high from low performers but does not fully distinguish high from medium performers.

Significance. If the Index Performance Summary validly isolates long-term operational performance and the regressions isolate market pricing of that information, the paper would add evidence on value relevance in an emerging-market setting. The use of rolling five-year windows and panel fixed effects is a reasonable design choice for the question, but the absence of any reported robustness checks on the index construction itself substantially weakens the potential contribution.

major comments (2)

[Methods (Index Performance Summary and performance-level classification)] The construction of the Index Performance Summary (unification of profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness over five-year windows, followed by segregation into high/medium/low levels) is load-bearing for the central claim yet receives no sensitivity analysis. Alternative normalizations, weightings, or percentile cutoffs could alter the performance-group dummies and therefore the regression results; without such checks the differentiation finding cannot be distinguished from an artifact of the specific index recipe.
[Results and hypothesis tests] The abstract states that multiple regressions and hypothesis tests were performed, but neither coefficient tables, standard errors, R² values, nor robustness specifications (e.g., alternative fixed-effects structures or controls) are described. Because the claim of market differentiation rests entirely on these statistical outputs, their omission prevents evaluation of economic magnitude or statistical reliability.

minor comments (2)

[Data and sample] The sample period ends in 2009; a brief discussion of whether results are sensitive to the inclusion of post-2009 data or to the 2008 crisis window would improve context.
[Methods] Variable definitions and the precise formula for combining the three accounting dimensions into the Index Performance Summary are not stated explicitly; adding an appendix table with the exact aggregation rule would aid replicability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods (Index Performance Summary and performance-level classification)] The construction of the Index Performance Summary (unification of profitability, sales variation, and indebtedness over five-year windows, followed by segregation into high/medium/low levels) is load-bearing for the central claim yet receives no sensitivity analysis. Alternative normalizations, weightings, or percentile cutoffs could alter the performance-group dummies and therefore the regression results; without such checks the differentiation finding cannot be distinguished from an artifact of the specific index recipe.

Authors: We agree that sensitivity analysis on the Index Performance Summary is needed to support the robustness of the classification. In the revised manuscript we will add checks using alternative normalizations, component weightings, and different percentile thresholds for the high/medium/low groups, and will report whether the regression results on market differentiation remain materially unchanged. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and hypothesis tests] The abstract states that multiple regressions and hypothesis tests were performed, but neither coefficient tables, standard errors, R² values, nor robustness specifications (e.g., alternative fixed-effects structures or controls) are described. Because the claim of market differentiation rests entirely on these statistical outputs, their omission prevents evaluation of economic magnitude or statistical reliability.

Authors: We acknowledge that the submitted version omitted the detailed regression output. The revised manuscript will include the full coefficient tables, standard errors, R² values, and additional robustness specifications (alternative fixed-effects structures and controls) so that readers can evaluate the statistical and economic significance of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper constructs an Index Performance Summary by combining accounting metrics (profitability, sales variation, indebtedness) over rolling five-year windows from disclosed financial statements, segregates firms into high/medium/low groups, and runs panel regressions with fixed effects and dummies to test association with independent stock price data. No equation or step reduces the claimed market differentiation to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction; market outcomes remain external to the accounting index. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The derivation is an empirical association test and remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the ad-hoc performance index and the assumption that fixed-effects panel regressions isolate the market's response to that index. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

Index Performance Summary construction rules
Accounting variables are unified into a single index whose exact weighting or aggregation method is not specified in the abstract; thresholds separating high/medium/low are also chosen to enable segregation.
Five-year window length and number of periods
Mobile five-year windows producing ten periods are selected without reported sensitivity analysis.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Fixed-effects model is appropriate for the panel and removes unobserved firm heterogeneity that would otherwise bias the performance dummies.
Invoked when the authors state they use 'panel data techniques, fixed effects model'.
domain assumption Stock prices reflect investor differentiation based on the accounting performance index rather than correlated omitted factors.
Required for interpreting regression coefficients on the performance-group dummies as evidence of market differentiation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5727 in / 1414 out tokens · 22335 ms · 2026-05-24T15:11:02.132791+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

quando influencia decisões econômicas dos usuários, ajudando-os a avaliar eventos passados, presentes ou futuros ou confirmando, ou corrigindo suas avaliações passadas

BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos 11(1):34-46, janeiro/março 2014 2014 by Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/base.2014.111.03 RESUMO Seguindo as pesquisas sobre relevância da informação contábil para o valor da empresa (em inglês, categorizadas pela expressão value relevance), este estudo verifica se o mercado dife- rencia as empresas de al...

work page doi:10.4013/base.2014.111.03 2014
[2]

preços das ações sempre ‘refletem com- pletamente’ todas as informações disponíveis

define um mercado eficiente como aquele em que os “preços das ações sempre ‘refletem com- pletamente’ todas as informações disponíveis” e classifica essa eficiência em fraca, semiforte e forte, de acordo com os subconjuntos de informações disponíveis. Sob essa ótica, para que todas as informações relevantes sobre os eventos ocorridos possam influenciar no...

work page 1986
[3]

encontraram um relacionamento significan- temente positivo entre medidas de desempenho financeiro baseadas em indicadores contábeis e de mercado. Nesse contexto, Lyra e Corrar (2009) desenvolveram uma pesquisa junto a docentes brasileiros e norte-americanos sobre quais indicadores são necessários e suficientes para diferenciação e avaliação de desempenho....

work page 2009
[4]

tendem a aumentar. A relação contemporânea entre lucro e retorno das ações cresce fortemente se analisada no longo prazo devido à presença de eventos econômicos que provocam revisões nas expectativas de mercado e que não são capturados nos resultados correntes, ou eventos econômicos passados podem estar influenciando os resultados atuais. Com o objetivo d...

work page 2008
[5]

Os preços foram extraídos da base de dados Economática®

No que compete às ações, foi considerado o valor de fechamento no último dia de cotação do ano, ajustados pelos dividendos. Os preços foram extraídos da base de dados Economática®. O critério de escolha do tipo de ação a ser estudado foi o de maior liquidez no período que compreende a pesquisa. MODELO ECONOMÉTRICO A aplicação dos testes empíricos consider...

work page 2006
[6]

A heterocedasticidade em dados de corte transversal pode ser mais a regra do que a exceção (Gujarati, 2006)

< 0 TESTES DE ROBUSTEZ Para medir a robustez dos dados empíricos, foram realizados testes quanto à existência de raiz unitária nas séries, quanto à distribuição das séries e quanto à existência de autocorrelação nos termos de perturbação aleatórios. A heterocedasticidade em dados de corte transversal pode ser mais a regra do que a exceção (Gujarati, 2006)...

work page 2006
[7]

Na Tabela 1, encontram-se as correlações de Pearson entre as variáveis utilizadas no modelo testado

Os valores das correlações servem como uma referência preliminar das relações existentes entre as variáveis adotadas na pesquisa. Na Tabela 1, encontram-se as correlações de Pearson entre as variáveis utilizadas no modelo testado. Pelos valores apresentados, todas as variáveis apresentam correlações sig- nificantes, para o nível de 1%, com a variável depe...

work page 2001
[8]

Os resultados demonstram que o conjunto das variáveis contábeis utilizadas neste estudo para denotar o desempenho operacional das empresas é signifi- cantemente relevante para explicar o retorno das ações. Além disso, a redução consistente entre os grupos de alto, médio e baixo desempenho no coeficiente de resposta de cada variável contábil com esse retor...

work page 2014
[9]

Gerenciamento de Resultados para Sustentar a Expectativa do Mercado de Capitais: impactos no índice Market-to-Book. In: INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING CONGRESS – INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH E ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PROGRAMAS DE PÓS- GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS CONTÁBEIS, 3, 2008, Salvador, Anais... Salvador, ANPCONT. Disponível em:...

work page 2008
[10]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3):77-104

The Relevance of Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: another view . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3):77-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2 BEAVER, W.H

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00019-2
[11]

The Accounting Review, 77(2):453-474

Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. The Accounting Review, 77(2):453-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.453 BOLSA DE VALORES E DE MERCADORIAS E FUTUROS DE SÃO PAULO (BM&FBOVESPA)

work page doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.453 2002
[12]

Disponível em: www.bmfbovespa.com.br

Cotações Históricas. Disponível em: www.bmfbovespa.com.br. Acesso em: 12/03/2010. BROOKS, C

work page 2010
[13]

Disponível em: www.cvm.gov.br

Demonstrações Financeiras. Disponível em: www.cvm.gov.br. Acesso em: 10/03/2010. DECHOW, P.M.; KOTHARI, S.P.; WATTS, R.L

work page 2010
[14]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(2):133-168

The Relation Between Earnings and Cash Flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(2):133-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00020-2 EVIEWS

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00020-2
[15]

”Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”

Eviews 5 User’s Guide . Licença de uso do Banco Central do Brasil. Brasília, Quantitative Micro Software, 978 p. FAMA, E.F.1970. Efﬁ cient Capital Markets: a review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2):383-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2325486 FAMÁ, R.; PEROBELLI, R

work page doi:10.2307/2325486 1970
[16]

Stanford, FASB

Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts nº 5 – Recognition and measurement in ﬁ nancial statements of business enterprises. Stanford, FASB. Disponível em: http://www.fasb. org/jsp/FASB/Page/PreCodSectionPage&cid=1176156317989. Acesso em: 11/03/2014. FRIGO, M.L

work page 2014
[17]

São Paulo, Atlas, 550 p

Teoria da contabilidade. São Paulo, Atlas, 550 p. INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB). 2010 . International Accounting Standard nº 1: Presentation of ﬁ nancial statements. Disponível em: http://eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/ bnstandards/en/2013/ias1.pdf KOTHARI, S.P

work page 2010
[18]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31:105-231

Capital Markets Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31:105-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00030-1 LEV, B

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00030-1
[19]

São Paulo, USP

Anais... São Paulo, USP. Disponível em: http://congressousp.ﬁ pecaﬁ . org/artigos62006/400.pdf. Acesso em: 10/09/2010. LYRA, R.L.W.C.; CORRAR, L.J

work page 2010
[20]

The Journal of Finance, 39(3):575-592

The Capital Structure Puzzle . The Journal of Finance, 39(3):575-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2327916 NICHOLS, D.C.; WAHLEN, J.M

work page doi:10.2307/2327916
[21]

Accounting Horizons, 18(4):263-286

How do earnings numbers relate to stock returns? A review of classic accounting research with update evidence. Accounting Horizons, 18(4):263-286. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.263 46 BASE  REVISTA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO E CONTABILIDADE DA UNISINOS MERCADO E DESEMPENHO OPERACIONAL CONTÁBIL DE LONGO PRAZO ROWE, W.G.; MORROW Jr., J.L

work page doi:10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.263 2004
[22]

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(1):58-70

A Note on the Dimensionality of the Firm Financial Performance Construct Using Accounting, Market and Subjective Measures. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(1):58-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00188.x SALOTTI, B.M.; YAMAMOTO, M.M

work page doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00188.x 1936
[23]

Estudos Econômicos, 35(1):37-79

Testando as Previsões de Trade-off e Pecking Order sobre Dividendos e Dívidas no Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, 35(1):37-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612005000100002 TITMAN, S.; WESSELS, R. 1988.The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1):01-19. VERRECHIA, R.E

work page doi:10.1590/s0101-41612005000100002 1988
[24]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32( 1-3):97-180

Essays on Disclosure . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32( 1-3):97-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8 WATTS, R.L.; ZIMMERMAN, J.L

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00025-8
[25]

London, MIT Press, 735 p

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. London, MIT Press, 735 p. Submetido: 28/01/2012 Aceito: 25/1 1/2012 MEG SARKIS SIMÃO ROSA Centro Universitário de Brasília SEPN 707/907, Campus do Uniceub Asa Norte 70790-075, Brasília, DF, Brasil PAULO ROBERTO BARBOSA LUSTOSA Universidade de Brasília Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidad...

work page 2012

[1] [1]

quando influencia decisões econômicas dos usuários, ajudando-os a avaliar eventos passados, presentes ou futuros ou confirmando, ou corrigindo suas avaliações passadas

BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos 11(1):34-46, janeiro/março 2014 2014 by Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/base.2014.111.03 RESUMO Seguindo as pesquisas sobre relevância da informação contábil para o valor da empresa (em inglês, categorizadas pela expressão value relevance), este estudo verifica se o mercado dife- rencia as empresas de al...

work page doi:10.4013/base.2014.111.03 2014

[2] [2]

preços das ações sempre ‘refletem com- pletamente’ todas as informações disponíveis

define um mercado eficiente como aquele em que os “preços das ações sempre ‘refletem com- pletamente’ todas as informações disponíveis” e classifica essa eficiência em fraca, semiforte e forte, de acordo com os subconjuntos de informações disponíveis. Sob essa ótica, para que todas as informações relevantes sobre os eventos ocorridos possam influenciar no...

work page 1986

[3] [3]

encontraram um relacionamento significan- temente positivo entre medidas de desempenho financeiro baseadas em indicadores contábeis e de mercado. Nesse contexto, Lyra e Corrar (2009) desenvolveram uma pesquisa junto a docentes brasileiros e norte-americanos sobre quais indicadores são necessários e suficientes para diferenciação e avaliação de desempenho....

work page 2009

[4] [4]

tendem a aumentar. A relação contemporânea entre lucro e retorno das ações cresce fortemente se analisada no longo prazo devido à presença de eventos econômicos que provocam revisões nas expectativas de mercado e que não são capturados nos resultados correntes, ou eventos econômicos passados podem estar influenciando os resultados atuais. Com o objetivo d...

work page 2008

[5] [5]

Os preços foram extraídos da base de dados Economática®

No que compete às ações, foi considerado o valor de fechamento no último dia de cotação do ano, ajustados pelos dividendos. Os preços foram extraídos da base de dados Economática®. O critério de escolha do tipo de ação a ser estudado foi o de maior liquidez no período que compreende a pesquisa. MODELO ECONOMÉTRICO A aplicação dos testes empíricos consider...

work page 2006

[6] [6]

A heterocedasticidade em dados de corte transversal pode ser mais a regra do que a exceção (Gujarati, 2006)

< 0 TESTES DE ROBUSTEZ Para medir a robustez dos dados empíricos, foram realizados testes quanto à existência de raiz unitária nas séries, quanto à distribuição das séries e quanto à existência de autocorrelação nos termos de perturbação aleatórios. A heterocedasticidade em dados de corte transversal pode ser mais a regra do que a exceção (Gujarati, 2006)...

work page 2006

[7] [7]

Na Tabela 1, encontram-se as correlações de Pearson entre as variáveis utilizadas no modelo testado

Os valores das correlações servem como uma referência preliminar das relações existentes entre as variáveis adotadas na pesquisa. Na Tabela 1, encontram-se as correlações de Pearson entre as variáveis utilizadas no modelo testado. Pelos valores apresentados, todas as variáveis apresentam correlações sig- nificantes, para o nível de 1%, com a variável depe...

work page 2001

[8] [8]

Os resultados demonstram que o conjunto das variáveis contábeis utilizadas neste estudo para denotar o desempenho operacional das empresas é signifi- cantemente relevante para explicar o retorno das ações. Além disso, a redução consistente entre os grupos de alto, médio e baixo desempenho no coeficiente de resposta de cada variável contábil com esse retor...

work page 2014

[9] [9]

Gerenciamento de Resultados para Sustentar a Expectativa do Mercado de Capitais: impactos no índice Market-to-Book. In: INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING CONGRESS – INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH E ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PROGRAMAS DE PÓS- GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS CONTÁBEIS, 3, 2008, Salvador, Anais... Salvador, ANPCONT. Disponível em:...

work page 2008

[10] [10]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3):77-104

The Relevance of Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: another view . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3):77-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2 BEAVER, W.H

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00019-2

[11] [11]

The Accounting Review, 77(2):453-474

Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. The Accounting Review, 77(2):453-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.453 BOLSA DE VALORES E DE MERCADORIAS E FUTUROS DE SÃO PAULO (BM&FBOVESPA)

work page doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.453 2002

[12] [12]

Disponível em: www.bmfbovespa.com.br

Cotações Históricas. Disponível em: www.bmfbovespa.com.br. Acesso em: 12/03/2010. BROOKS, C

work page 2010

[13] [13]

Disponível em: www.cvm.gov.br

Demonstrações Financeiras. Disponível em: www.cvm.gov.br. Acesso em: 10/03/2010. DECHOW, P.M.; KOTHARI, S.P.; WATTS, R.L

work page 2010

[14] [14]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(2):133-168

The Relation Between Earnings and Cash Flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(2):133-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00020-2 EVIEWS

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00020-2

[15] [15]

”Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”

Eviews 5 User’s Guide . Licença de uso do Banco Central do Brasil. Brasília, Quantitative Micro Software, 978 p. FAMA, E.F.1970. Efﬁ cient Capital Markets: a review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2):383-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2325486 FAMÁ, R.; PEROBELLI, R

work page doi:10.2307/2325486 1970

[16] [16]

Stanford, FASB

Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts nº 5 – Recognition and measurement in ﬁ nancial statements of business enterprises. Stanford, FASB. Disponível em: http://www.fasb. org/jsp/FASB/Page/PreCodSectionPage&cid=1176156317989. Acesso em: 11/03/2014. FRIGO, M.L

work page 2014

[17] [17]

São Paulo, Atlas, 550 p

Teoria da contabilidade. São Paulo, Atlas, 550 p. INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB). 2010 . International Accounting Standard nº 1: Presentation of ﬁ nancial statements. Disponível em: http://eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/ bnstandards/en/2013/ias1.pdf KOTHARI, S.P

work page 2010

[18] [18]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31:105-231

Capital Markets Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31:105-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00030-1 LEV, B

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00030-1

[19] [19]

São Paulo, USP

Anais... São Paulo, USP. Disponível em: http://congressousp.ﬁ pecaﬁ . org/artigos62006/400.pdf. Acesso em: 10/09/2010. LYRA, R.L.W.C.; CORRAR, L.J

work page 2010

[20] [20]

The Journal of Finance, 39(3):575-592

The Capital Structure Puzzle . The Journal of Finance, 39(3):575-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2327916 NICHOLS, D.C.; WAHLEN, J.M

work page doi:10.2307/2327916

[21] [21]

Accounting Horizons, 18(4):263-286

How do earnings numbers relate to stock returns? A review of classic accounting research with update evidence. Accounting Horizons, 18(4):263-286. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.263 46 BASE  REVISTA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO E CONTABILIDADE DA UNISINOS MERCADO E DESEMPENHO OPERACIONAL CONTÁBIL DE LONGO PRAZO ROWE, W.G.; MORROW Jr., J.L

work page doi:10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.263 2004

[22] [22]

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(1):58-70

A Note on the Dimensionality of the Firm Financial Performance Construct Using Accounting, Market and Subjective Measures. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(1):58-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00188.x SALOTTI, B.M.; YAMAMOTO, M.M

work page doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00188.x 1936

[23] [23]

Estudos Econômicos, 35(1):37-79

Testando as Previsões de Trade-off e Pecking Order sobre Dividendos e Dívidas no Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, 35(1):37-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612005000100002 TITMAN, S.; WESSELS, R. 1988.The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1):01-19. VERRECHIA, R.E

work page doi:10.1590/s0101-41612005000100002 1988

[24] [24]

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32( 1-3):97-180

Essays on Disclosure . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32( 1-3):97-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8 WATTS, R.L.; ZIMMERMAN, J.L

work page doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00025-8

[25] [25]

London, MIT Press, 735 p

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. London, MIT Press, 735 p. Submetido: 28/01/2012 Aceito: 25/1 1/2012 MEG SARKIS SIMÃO ROSA Centro Universitário de Brasília SEPN 707/907, Campus do Uniceub Asa Norte 70790-075, Brasília, DF, Brasil PAULO ROBERTO BARBOSA LUSTOSA Universidade de Brasília Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidad...

work page 2012