Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Impact of the Capacity Drop Phenomenon for Freeway Traffic Flow Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.10347 v1 pith:GMSEY3XQ submitted 2021-06-18 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords capacitycontrollerdropflowtrafficcontroldensitydesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Capacity drop is an empirically observed phenomenon in vehicular traffic flow on freeways whereby, after a critical density is reached, a state of congestion sets in, but the freeway does not become decongested again until the density drops well below the critical density. This introduces a hysteresis effect so that it is easier to enter the congested state than to leave it. However, many existing first-order models of traffic flow, particularly those used for control design, ignore capacity drop, leading to suboptimal controllers. In this paper, we consider a cell transmission model of traffic flow that incorporates capacity drop to study the problem of optimal freeway ramp metering. We show that, if capacity drop is ignored in the control design, then the resulting controller, obtained via a convex program, may be significantly suboptimal. We then propose an alternative model predictive controller that accounts for capacity drop via a mixed integer linear program and show that, for sufficiently large rollout horizon, this controller is optimal. We also compare these approaches to a heuristic hand-crafted controller that is viewed as a modification of an integral feedback controller to account for capacity drop. This heuristic controller outperforms the controller that ignores capacity drop but underperforms compared to the proposed alternative model predictive controller. These results suggest that it is generally important to include capacity drop in the controller design process, and we demonstrate this insight on several case studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools