Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

New Insights on Target Speaker Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.00733 v2 pith:GNK6QMHY submitted 2022-02-01 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords informationauxiliaryperformancespeakerextractiondatasetssystemstarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Speaker extraction (SE) aims to segregate the speech of a target speaker from a mixture of interfering speakers with the help of auxiliary information. Several forms of auxiliary information have been employed in single-channel SE, such as a speech snippet enrolled from the target speaker or visual information corresponding to the spoken utterance. The effectiveness of the auxiliary information in SE is typically evaluated by comparing the extraction performance of SE with uninformed speaker separation (SS) methods. Following this evaluation protocol, many SE studies have reported performance improvement compared to SS, attributing this to the auxiliary information. However, such studies have been conducted on a few datasets and have not considered recent deep neural network architectures for SS that have shown impressive separation performance. In this paper, we examine the role of the auxiliary information in SE for different input scenarios and over multiple datasets. Specifically, we compare the performance of two SE systems (audio-based and video-based) with SS using a common framework that utilizes the recently proposed dual-path recurrent neural network as the main learning machine. Experimental evaluation on various datasets demonstrates that the use of auxiliary information in the considered SE systems does not always lead to better extraction performance compared to the uninformed SS system. Furthermore, we offer insights into the behavior of the SE systems when provided with different and distorted auxiliary information given the same mixture input.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lightweight Target-Speaker-Based Overlap Transcription for Practical Streaming ASR

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A streaming ASR system using a cheap overlap detector and a FiLM-conditioned target-speaker acoustic model reduces Czech debate overlap WER from 68.0% to 35.78% with 44% extra compute.

  2. An Investigation on Speaker Augmentation for End-to-End Speaker Extraction

    cs.SD 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Speaker augmentation via resampling and rescaling creates pseudo-speakers and hard training samples that reduce target confusion and improve end-to-end speaker extraction.

  3. Training Strategies for Modality Dropout Resilient Multi-Modal Target Speaker Extraction

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Modality dropout training makes audio-visual target speaker extraction robust when audio or video is missing, across normalization layers and in causal configurations.

  4. X-CrossNet: A complex spectral mapping approach to target speaker extraction with cross attention speaker embedding fusion

    cs.SD 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    X-CrossNet applies the CrossNet separation backbone to target speaker extraction with cross-attention speaker embedding fusion, reporting small improvements on WSJ0-2mix and WHAMR!.

Pith tools