Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 53 references

Unified Vertex Motion Estimation for Integrated Video Stabilization and Stitching in Tractor-Trailer Wheeled Robots

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A unified vertex motion field, the sum of stabilization and stitching motions, can simultaneously smooth vibration and align tractor and trailer views of a wheeled robot without pose estimation.

desk verdict A real, deployable surround-view system for articulated vehicles with a plausible dual-stabilization design, but the headline distortion-propagation claim is unsupported by the paper's own equations and the evaluation needs cleanup. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07154 v2 pith:GNXNJKYT submitted 2024-12-10 cs.RO

Hao Liang , Zhipeng Dong , Hao Li , Yufeng Yue , Mengyin Fu , Yi Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords videostabilizationstitchingtractor-trailerwheeledrobotssurround-viewsystemmeshvertexmotionjointoptimizationarticulatedvehicleperceptionfeaturematching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that video stabilization and image stitching for tractor-trailer wheeled robots can be solved as one estimation problem rather than two separate pipelines. Its central claim is that each mesh vertex of the combined surround view can carry one unified motion: the sum of a stabilization motion that smooths the independent vibrations of the tractor and trailer and a stitching motion that aligns the two articulated units despite their changing hitch angle. Because both motions live on the same vertices, a single joint optimization handles them together, and the authors report that this prevents small alignment errors in the narrow overlap region from growing into large distortions elsewhere. The method is implemented on a real 4.5-meter, eight-camera robot, where the reported stitching scores beat the compared joint stitching-stabilization baselines while running several times faster than the slower baseline.

What carries the argument

The central object is the unified vertex motion field. Each image of each unit is divided into a mesh; for every vertex, a stabilization motion is built from a global homography plus Gaussian-weighted residual feature motion across consecutive frames, and a stitching motion is built the same way from feature correspondences between the tractor and trailer views. The unified motion is the linear sum of these two fields. A joint energy function then smooths the accumulated temporal trajectory of each vertex while keeping inter-unit stitching profiles aligned, solved by alternating minimization. This construction is what lets temporal and spatial alignment constrain the same vertices, connecting stitching and stabilization directly.

What would settle it

On a sharp turn of the 4.5-meter robot, track independent features in the non-overlapping regions and compare their observed motion to the motion predicted by the unified vertex field; if the alignment error increases with distance from the overlap or grows sharply as the hitch angle changes, the claim that distortions do not propagate outward is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the asynchronous vibrations and dynamic relative pose of a tractor-trailer system can be handled by one spatiotemporal motion model estimated entirely in image coordinates. Stabilization motion fields are computed independently for the tractor and trailer units and then combined with stitching motion fields that are derived directly from feature displacements over an adaptive random plane, with no pose estimation or geometric priors. These two fields are summed into a unified vertex motion, and a joint optimization of accumulated temporal trajectories and inter-unit stitching profiles yields a surround-view panorama in which distortions in low-overlap regions do not propagate catastrophically into non-overlapping areas. The framework has been deployed on a real tractor-trailer robot, and in the reported experiments it outperforms prior joint stitching-stabilization methods on stitching score while requiring much less computation per frame.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that a stitching alignment computed from feature matches in the small overlapping region can be safely extended to all mesh vertices, including non-overlapping areas, without creating new distortion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A tractor-trailer surround-view system can run stabilization and stitching inside one real-time optimization on embedded hardware, avoiding a separate pose-estimation stage.
  • Because no mechanical or visual pose sensors are required, the same framework transfers to other articulated multi-camera vehicles without additional hitch calibration.
  • Joint optimization on shared vertices lets information from spatially adjacent cameras compensate for cropping and distortion caused by stabilization, improving the cropping ratio.
  • On the Guo et al. dataset, the reported stitching scores are lower (better) than both compared joint stitching-stabilization baselines, and per-frame computation time is several times smaller than the slower baseline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear superposition in Eq. 18 is the load-bearing design choice; a natural stress test is to change the hitch angle quickly and measure whether non-overlap distortion stays bounded, since the paper does not ablate this directly.
  • The same vertex-motion formulation should transfer to any multi-camera rig with a non-rigid baseline, such as construction vehicles or multi-segment robots, by adding one inter-unit motion field per adjacent camera pair.
  • Because the stitching motion is estimated only from overlapping-region features, texture-free or occluded overlap could starve the inter field; a testable extension is to temporally smooth the inter field when overlap features are scarce.
  • The reported cropping-ratio improvement suggests surround-view systems have a structural advantage over single-camera stabilization, which could be tested by comparing single-view and surround-view versions of the same stabilizer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a unified vertex-motion framework for jointly stabilizing and stitching surround-view video from tractor-trailer wheeled robots. Each unit (tractor/trailer) first produces a partial surround view via pre-calibrated homographies; LoFTR establishes intra-frame feature matches (temporal, for stabilization) and inter-unit matches (spatial, for stitching). Stabilization and stitching motions are propagated to mesh vertices as global homography plus residual terms and then added linearly to form a unified vertex motion (Eq. 18). A three-stage alternating optimization smooths temporal trajectories and aligns stitching profiles (Eqs. 21-24), and the final panorama is generated by mesh warping. Experiments include stabilization metrics on self-collected cases, qualitative stitching comparisons, and joint stabilization-stitching scores on the Guo et al. dataset, plus a real deployment on a 4.5 m TTWR with eight cameras. The central claim is that this unified motion prevents distortions in overlapping regions from propagating into non-overlapping areas.

Significance. If valid, the contribution would be practically relevant: a single mesh motion field that simultaneously stabilizes asynchronous tractor/trailer vibrations and adapts stitching to changing hitch angles, without pose estimation. The paper's strengths include release of code, deployment on real hardware, comparison against several recent baselines, and a reported runtime of 1.44-1.97 s/frame on the joint task. However, the principal novelty—the anti-distortion-propagation property of unified vertex motion—is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the quantitative evidence has important gaps (metric circularity, missing variance, case-label inconsistencies). The framework is plausible as an engineering contribution, but the claimed advantage over separate stabilization-then-stitching pipelines is not yet established at the level required by the abstract and highlights.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.4 and Abstract] The central claim that unified vertex motion 'prevents distortions in overlapping regions from exponentially propagating into non-overlapping areas' is not supported by the formulation or by any dedicated experiment. In Eqs. (13)-(17), the stitching homography is estimated only from correspondences in the overlap region (Eq. 14) and is then applied to every vertex (Eq. 15); outside the overlap, the residual term (Eq. 16) has no inter-unit features and vanishes, so non-overlap vertices are displaced purely by the overlap-fitted plane. The energy (Eqs. 21-23) contains no term that penalizes non-overlap distortion. No error-propagation bound, sensitivity analysis, or ablation (e.g., unified sum vs. sequential stabilization then stitching) is provided. For a 4.5 m vehicle with large parallax, this is precisely the regime where single-homography extrapolation is expected to fail, so the paper's principal novelty remains unverified. Please add a quantitative distortion/stability evaluation restricted to non-overlapping regions and an ablation of Eq. (18) against separate pipelines.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.3, Table 2] The stitching score used in Table 2 is the average reprojection error over feature pairs, which is closely related to the quantity that the proposed optimization minimizes. The stitching energy in Eq. (23) directly penalizes deviations of the optimized stitching profiles from the vertex motions derived from the matched features (Eqs. 14-17), so the reported improvement over Guo et al. and Nie et al. may reflect overfitting to the evaluation metric rather than genuinely better alignment. An independent evaluation using held-out features, a different correspondence method, or a human perceptual study is needed to substantiate the stitching superiority claim.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.3 and Fig. 8, Tables 1-2] The dataset and case numbering are internally inconsistent, which makes the experimental results difficult to interpret and reproduce. The text says Cases 1-7 are self-collected (with Case 6 snow and Case 7 nighttime) and Cases 8-10 come from Guo et al.; the Fig. 8 caption instead states that Cases 1-5 are daytime self-collected, Cases 6-8 are from Guo et al., and Cases 9-10 are snow/nighttime. Table 1 lists Case1-Right, Case1-Left, Case2-Right, Case2-Left, Case3, Case4, Case5, Case9, Case10, while Table 2 labels the Guo et al. subset as Cases 5, 6, and 7 even though the text refers to cases 8-10. Please harmonize these labels and make the mapping from videos to cases explicit.
  4. [Tables 1 and 2] All quantitative results are reported as single numbers without error bars, repeated trials, or statistical tests. Since the pipeline includes RANSAC/MAGSAC and feature matching, run-to-run variability is possible; without variance or at least a statement that the method is deterministic, the claim that the proposed method 'outperforms' the baselines is not statistically supported. Please report multiple runs (or evidence of determinism) and, where feasible, significance tests.
  5. [Sec. 4.2.1 and Table 1] The text states that 'our method achieved high cropping ratio levels across all seven cases,' but the table shows that for Case5 Ours has a cropping ratio of 0.8886, which is lower than Bundled (0.9705), Difrint (0.9682), and UVSS (0.9053). The claim should be restricted to the average or to the cases where the comparison actually holds.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 1] There is a typo: 'frpames' should be 'frames'.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The symbol L is described as multiband blending, but it is used as an operator without a formal definition; this should be clarified.
  3. [Sec. 3.3] The name 'Random Plane based' is misleading because the method estimates a deterministic homography with RANSAC; no stochastic plane sampling is described.
  4. [Sec. 3.4.4] The statement that convergence is achieved within 3 iterations in practice should be accompanied by a convergence criterion or a plot of the energy over iterations.
  5. [Sec. 4.2.2] The stitching comparison on the authors' own dataset is qualitative only (Fig. 10); adding a quantitative metric would strengthen the comparison.
  6. [Eq. (22)] The temporal window sigma, grid size m x n, and beta are free parameters with no sensitivity analysis; reporting the sensitivity would improve reproducibility.
  7. [Fig. 3 caption] The symbols mu,intra and mu→v,inter are introduced without explanation in the caption; please define them there.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Stitching evaluation partially measures the paper's own fitting objective; 'Random Plane' is a renamed standard homography-plus-residual warp. Central stabilization claims retain independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2.3 (Table 2) versus Section 3.3.2 Eq. (14) and Section 3.4.3 Eq. (23)]
    "The score, as defined in Guo et al., serves as a quantitative metric for evaluating the quality of results. It is computed based on the reprojection error of feature points... The stitching score for a single frame is determined by the average error across all feature pairs, and the highest value among all frames is designated as the final score."

    The reported stitching score is the average reprojection error of feature pairs, but Eqs. (14) and (23) fit the model to that same error: H_u->v is estimated by minimizing sum rho(||H(p_u)-p_v||^2), and L_stitch minimizes ||V_hat - V + DeltaT||^2. No held-out feature split or independently labeled test set is described. A low Table 2 score is therefore the value of the optimized objective, not a prediction of generalization, so the claim of superior stitching is partly forced by the fitting criterion.

  2. renaming known result [Highlights and Section 3.3 (Eqs. 13-17)]
    "We propose a Random Plane based Stitching Motion Estimation method, which directly derives pixel-level displacements from feature motions without relying on pose estimation or geometric priors. By modeling spatial deformations as stochastic adaptive planes, this method resolves dynamic ghosting artifacts caused by articulated pose variations."

    The 'Random Plane' contribution is implemented as a deterministic global homography H_u->v (Eq. 14) plus Gaussian-weighted residual interpolation (Eqs. 15-16), the standard homography-plus-mesh-residual stitching recipe. A homography is itself a plane-induced geometric model, so the 'without geometric priors' description is inaccurate; the only stochastic element is RANSAC/MAGSAC sampling. The new name repackages a known estimator rather than providing a new derivation.

full rationale

The paper's stabilization pipeline (Dual Independence intra-motion fields, temporal smoothing in Eq. 22, and the cropping/distortion/stability metrics of Table 1) is self-contained and independently testable; reported gains there are not circular. The UVSS citation and IROS acknowledgment are self-citations, but they are used for comparison and critique, not as the proof of the new method, so they do not raise the score. The main circularity concern is the stitching metric: the headline comparison in Table 2 uses reprojection error of feature pairs, which is exactly the quantity minimized by Eqs. (14), (16), and (23), with no held-out features described. In addition, the 'Random Plane' label overstates a standard homography-plus-residual estimator. The headline claim about preventing distortion propagation into non-overlapping areas is not circular but unsupported: outside the overlap, residual features are absent, so those vertices are displaced only by the overlap-fitted homography (Eq. 15); no error-propagation bound or ablation substantiates the 'exponentially propagating' language. Because the central stabilization claim and the real-robot demonstrations have independent content, the overall circularity is partial, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method's central claims rest on a small number of modeling choices and hand-set weights. The motion fields are fitted per video, not predicted from independent data, so the free parameters are optimization weights and mesh/temporal window sizes rather than physical constants. Three domain assumptions carry the load: fixed intra-unit homographies, linear superposition of the two motion fields, and sufficient LoFTR correspondences in the narrow overlap. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'Random Plane' is a label for the homography-based stitching model, which already exists in prior work.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda_t (temporal smoothing weight) = 1.2
    Set in Eq 22 with no sensitivity analysis; balances trajectory fidelity vs smoothness and affects all stabilization results.
  • beta (stitching-stabilization weight) = not reported
    Appears in Eq 21 and Eq 24 as the relative weight of stitching energy; no value, schedule, or sensitivity reported.
  • temporal window sigma and grid size m x n = not reported
    Defines the smoothing window (Eq 22) and mesh resolution; both affect motion field granularity and output quality.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Static intra-unit homographies from offline calibration remain valid during operation
    Sec 3.1 builds each partial view by warping with fixed homographies; any in-unit vibration or flex breaks this assumption.
  • domain assumption Linear superposition of stabilization and stitching motions is valid
    Eq 18 adds the two motion fields; no nonlinear interaction or handling of double-warping artifacts is modeled.
  • domain assumption LoFTR yields reliable correspondences in the narrow tractor-trailer overlap
    Sec 3.3.1 initializes all stitching from LoFTR matches; low overlap, night and snow scenes stress this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unified Vertex Motion Estimation for Integrated Video Stabilization and Stitching in Tractor-Trailer Wheeled Robots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GNXNJKYT

@misc{pith2026241207154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unified Vertex Motion Estimation for Integrated Video Stabilization and Stitching in Tractor-Trailer Wheeled Robots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GNXNJKYT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07154}
}
read the original abstract

Tractor-trailer wheeled robots need to perform comprehensive perception tasks to enhance their operations in areas such as logistics parks and long-haul transportation. The perception of these robots faces three major challenges: the asynchronous vibrations between the tractor and trailer, the relative pose change between the tractor and trailer, and the significant camera parallax caused by the large size. In this paper, we employ the Dual Independence Stabilization Motion Field Estimation method to address asynchronous vibrations between the tractor and trailer, effectively eliminating conflicting motion estimations for the same object in overlapping regions. We utilize the Random Plane-based Stitching Motion Field Estimation method to tackle the continuous relative pose changes caused by the articulated hitch between the tractor and trailer, thus eliminating dynamic misalignment in overlapping regions. Furthermore, we apply the Unified Vertex Motion Estimation method to manage the challenges posed by the tractor-trailer's large physical size, which results in severely low overlapping regions between the tractor and trailer views, thus preventing distortions in overlapping regions from exponentially propagating into non-overlapping areas. Furthermore, this framework has been successfully implemented in real tractor-trailer wheeled robots. The proposed Unified Vertex Motion Video Stabilization and Stitching method has been thoroughly tested in various challenging scenarios, demonstrating its accuracy and practicality in real-world.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07154 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Surround-view system of tractor-trailer wheeled robots. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of our method: Leveraging real-scene data from Beijing Institute of Technology, our method unfolds across five stages: (1) Pre-calibrated Semi-Surround View: Merging images from tractor and trailer cameras using pre-calibrated parameters to form forward and rearward wide-angle views; (2) Motion Initialization: Computing feature point displacements, distinguishing inter-motion and intra-motion for adjacent a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of Specific Technical Aspects: In the diagram, orange symbols represent data, m u,intra i,j (intra-unit feature motion), mu→v i,j (inter-unit correspondence mo￾tion). Black annotations describe core modules: Stabilization Motion Fields for temporal vibration c…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Intra Motion and Inter Motion: Demonstrating the distinc￾tion between Inter motion and Intra motion, with Inter motion showcasing the movement between adjacent views at a singular moment and Intra motion depicting the movement within the same view acros…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of vertex motion: This illustration delineates the concept of vertex motion, detailing the extrapolation of motion from feature points to all vertices within the ellipse. where H u,intra i ∈ R 3×3 is the global homography matrix for unit u at frame i, comp…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of the Optimized Stitching Vertex Profiles: This figure elucidates the impact of considering stabilization cost during the optimization of stitching vertex profiles. Subfigure (a) displays the original stitching profiles of camera A (blue) and camera B (o…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental Hardware Setup: Depicting the TTWR utilized for real-world experimentation, showcasing the distinct placement of cameras and the articulated hitch connecting the tractor and trailer units. The tractor unit, primarily based on the SAIC￾GM-Wuling Baojun E100…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of the experimental datasets for cases 1-10: This visualiza￾tion provides a brief overview of our experimental scenarios. Cases 1-5 represent daytime scenes collected by us. Cases 6-8 are daytime datasets provided by Guo et al. Case 9 comprises snow scene…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stabilization Visualization: Subfigure (a) illustrates the curves before and after smoothing, demonstrating the effectiveness of our stabilization process. Subfigure (b) provides the visual effect of this smoothing on the recorded footage, highlighting the enhancements…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison with previous stitching approaches on our Dataset: In the ”Input” column, the top of each row represents the left view, while the bottom represents the right view. From top to bottom, the first and second rows are daytime data, the third row is snow scene d…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Subjective comparison with (Guo et al., 2016) and (Nie et al., 2017) in case 7. Left to right: results of (Guo et al., 2016), results of (Nie et al., 2017), and ours. We utilized a framework akin to the one presented in Guo et al.(Guo et al., 2016) and Nie et al.(Nie …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: TTWR’s Surround-view: Illustration of the surround-view stitching results achieved for tractor-trailer wheeled robots (TTWRs) using our proposed method. on human perception following the multi-band blending of stitched images. It is of significance that our method sub…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  4. [4]

    Babaei Robat , author K

    author A. Babaei Robat , author K. Arezoo , author K. Alipour , author B. Tarvirdizadeh , title Dynamics modeling and path following controller of tractor-trailer-wheeled robots considering wheels slip , journal ISA Transactions volume 148 ( year 2024 ) pages 45--63 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019057824001022. :https://doi.org/10...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2024.03.004 2024

  5. [5]

    Miao , author Y

    author S. Miao , author Y. Zhou , title An identical path tracking control strategy of the tractor-trailer wheeled mobile robot with an off-axle hitching based on a passive steering angle , journal Journal of the Franklin Institute volume 361 ( year 2024 ) pages 106634 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016003224000425. :https://doi.org...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.01.035 2024

  6. [6]

    author P. M. Kolahi , author M. Nazemizadeh , title Nonlinear dynamic modeling of tractor-trailer mobile robots with consideration of wheels inertia and their optimal point-to point path planning , journal Meccanica volume 58 ( year 2023 ) pages 245--253 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01578-6. :10.1007/s11012-022-01578-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11012-022-01578-6 2023

  7. [7]

    Peng , author B

    author H. Peng , author B. Shi , author J. Song , author X. Wang , title A symplectic method for trajectory planning of general tractor-trailer systems , journal Applied Mathematical Modelling volume 114 ( year 2023 ) pages 205--229 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X22004747. :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.10.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apm.2022.10.008 2023

  8. [8]

    Han , author K

    author S. Han , author K. Yoon , author G. Park , author K. Huh , title Robust lane keeping control for tractor with multi-unit trailer under parametric uncertainty , journal IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles volume 9 ( year 2024 ) pages 2333--2347 . :10.1109/TIV.2023.3272655

    arXiv 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Guevara , author F

    author L. Guevara , author F. Jorquera , author K. Walas , author F. Auat-Cheein , title Robust control strategy for generalized n-trailer vehicles based on a dual-stage disturbance observer , journal Control Engineering Practice volume 131 ( year 2023 ) pages 105382 . https:/...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Beglini , author T

    author M. Beglini , author T. Belvedere , author L. Lanari , author G. Oriolo , title An intrinsically stable mpc approach for anti-jackknifing control of tractor-trailer vehicles , journal IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics volume 27 ( year 2022 ) pages 4417--4428 . :10.1...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Yang , author L

    author F. Yang , author L. Zhao , title Closed-form solution of principal line for camera calibration based on orthogonal vanishing points , journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology volume 33 ( year 2023 ) pages 521--533 . :10.1109/TCSVT.2022.3205386

    2023

  4. [12]

    author M. M. Michałek , title Scalable parametric-identification procedure for kinematics of automated n-trailer vehicles , journal IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology volume 73 ( year 2024 ) pages 7758--7770 . :10.1109/TVT.2024.3357886

    2024

  5. [13]

    Liu , author A

    author X. Liu , author A. K. Madhusudhanan , author D. Cebon , title Minimum swept-path control for autonomous reversing of a tractor semi-trailer , journal IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology volume 68 ( year 2019 ) pages 4367--4376 . :10.1109/TVT.2019.2895513

    2019

  6. [14]

    author C. d. Saxe , author D. Cebon , title Camera-based articulation angle sensing for heavy goods vehicles , journal IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology volume 70 ( year 2021 ) pages 7522--7535 . :10.1109/TVT.2021.3091759

    2021

  7. [15]

    Li , author L

    author W. Li , author L. Cao , author P. Yue , author S. Wen , author J. Liao , author J. Xia , author X. Feng , title Vavm: A flexible technique for variable-angle around view monitor system towards articulated engineering vehicle , journal IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Ling , author M

    author Q. Ling , author M. Zhao , title Stabilization of traffic videos based on both foreground and background feature trajectories , journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology volume 29 ( year 2018 ) pages 2215--2228

    2018

  9. [17]

    Ye , author E

    author J. Ye , author E. Pan , author W. Xu , title Digital video stabilization method based on periodic jitters of airborne vision of large flapping wing robots , journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology ( year 2023 ) pages 1--1 . :10.1109/TCSVT....

    2023

  10. [18]

    Xue , author W

    author W. Xue , author W. Xie , author Y. Zhang , author S. Chen , title Stable linear structures and seam measurements for parallax image stitching , journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology volume 32 ( year 2022 ) pages 253--261 . :10.1109/TCSVT...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Zhao , author Q

    author M. Zhao , author Q. Ling , title Adaptively meshed video stabilization , journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology volume 31 ( year 2021 ) pages 3504--3517 . :10.1109/TCSVT.2020.3040753

    2021

  12. [20]

    Guo , author S

    author H. Guo , author S. Liu , author T. He , author S. Zhu , author B. Zeng , author M. Gabbouj , title Joint video stitching and stabilization from moving cameras , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 25 ( year 2016 ) pages 5491--5503

    2016

  13. [21]

    Liu , author P

    author S. Liu , author P. Tan , author L. Yuan , author J. Sun , author B. Zeng , title Meshflow: Minimum latency online video stabilization , in: booktitle Computer Vision--ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part...

    2016

  14. [22]

    Brown , author D

    author M. Brown , author D. G. Lowe , title Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features , journal International journal of computer vision volume 74 ( year 2007 ) pages 59--73

    2007

  15. [23]

    Chang , author Y

    author C.-H. Chang , author Y. Sato , author Y.-Y. Chuang , title Shape-preserving half-projective warps for image stitching , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , year 2014 , pp. pages 3254--3261

    2014

  16. [24]

    Lin , author S

    author C.-C. Lin , author S. U. Pankanti , author K. Natesan Ramamurthy , author A. Y. Aravkin , title Adaptive as-natural-as-possible image stitching , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year 2015 , pp. pages 1155--1163

    2015

  17. [25]

    Gao , author Y

    author J. Gao , author Y. Li , author T.-J. Chin , author M. S. Brown , title Seam-driven image stitching. , in: booktitle Eurographics (Short Papers) , year 2013 , pp. pages 45--48

    2013

  18. [26]

    Zaragoza , author T.-J

    author J. Zaragoza , author T.-J. Chin , author M. S. Brown , author D. Suter , title As-projective-as-possible image stitching with moving dlt , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , year 2013 , pp. pages 2339--2346

    2013

  19. [27]

    Zhang , author F

    author F. Zhang , author F. Liu , title Parallax-tolerant image stitching , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year 2014 , pp. pages 3262--3269

    2014

  20. [28]

    Nie , author C

    author L. Nie , author C. Lin , author K. Liao , author S. Liu , author Y. Zhao , title Unsupervised deep image stitching: Reconstructing stitched features to images , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 30 ( year 2021 ) pages 6184--6197

    2021

  21. [29]

    Fu , author H

    author M. Fu , author H. Liang , author C. Zhu , author Z. Dong , author R. Sun , author Y. Yue , author Y. Yang , title Image stitching techniques applied to plane or 3-d models: A review , journal IEEE Sensors Journal volume 23 ( year 2023 ) pages 8060--8079 . :10.1109/JSEN....

    2023

  22. [30]

    Matsushita , author E

    author Y. Matsushita , author E. Ofek , author W. Ge , author X. Tang , author H.-Y. Shum , title Full-frame video stabilization with motion inpainting , journal IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 28 ( year 2006 ) pages 1150--1163

    2006

  23. [31]

    Chang , author S.-H

    author H.-C. Chang , author S.-H. Lai , author K.-R. Lu , title A robust real-time video stabilization algorithm , journal Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation volume 17 ( year 2006 ) pages 659--673

    2006

  24. [32]

    Grundmann , author V

    author M. Grundmann , author V. Kwatra , author I. Essa , title Auto-directed video stabilization with robust l1 optimal camera paths , in: booktitle CVPR 2011 , organization IEEE , year 2011 , pp. pages 225--232

    2011

  25. [33]

    Liu , author M

    author F. Liu , author M. Gleicher , author H. Jin , author A. Agarwala , title Content-preserving warps for 3d video stabilization , journal ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) volume 28 ( year 2009 ) pages 1--9

    2009

  26. [34]

    Liu , author M

    author F. Liu , author M. Gleicher , author J. Wang , author H. Jin , author A. Agarwala , title Subspace video stabilization , journal ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) volume 30 ( year 2011 ) pages 1--10

    2011

  27. [35]

    Liu , author L

    author S. Liu , author L. Yuan , author P. Tan , author J. Sun , title Bundled camera paths for video stabilization , journal ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) volume 32 ( year 2013 ) pages 1--10

    2013

  28. [36]

    Wang , author G.-Y

    author M. Wang , author G.-Y. Yang , author J.-K. Lin , author S.-H. Zhang , author A. Shamir , author S.-P. Lu , author S.-M. Hu , title Deep online video stabilization with multi-grid warping transformation learning , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 28 (...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Choi , author I

    author J. Choi , author I. S. Kweon , title Deep iterative frame interpolation for full-frame video stabilization , journal ACM Trans. Graph. volume 39 ( year 2020 ). https://doi.org/10.1145/3363550. :10.1145/3363550

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Xu , author J

    author Y. Xu , author J. Zhang , author S. J. Maybank , author D. Tao , title Dut: learning video stabilization by simply watching unstable videos , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 31 ( year 2022 ) pages 4306--4320

    2022

  31. [39]

    Zhang , author Z

    author Z. Zhang , author Z. Liu , author P. Tan , author B. Zeng , author S. Liu , title Minimum latency deep online video stabilization , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , year 2023 , pp. pages 23030--23039

    2023

  32. [40]

    Xu , author J

    author W. Xu , author J. Mulligan , title Panoramic video stitching from commodity hdtv cameras , journal Multimedia systems volume 19 ( year 2013 ) pages 407--426

    2013

  33. [41]

    Hamza , author R

    author A. Hamza , author R. Hafiz , author M. M. Khan , author Y. Cho , author J. Cha , title Stabilization of panoramic videos from mobile multi-camera platforms , journal Image and Vision Computing volume 37 ( year 2015 ) pages 20--30

    2015

  34. [42]

    Lin , author S

    author K. Lin , author S. Liu , author L.-F. Cheong , author B. Zeng , title Seamless video stitching from hand-held camera inputs , in: booktitle Computer Graphics Forum , volume volume 35 , organization Wiley Online Library , year 2016 , pp. pages 479--487

    2016

  35. [43]

    Nie , author T

    author Y. Nie , author T. Su , author Z. Zhang , author H. Sun , author G. Li , title Dynamic video stitching via shakiness removing , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 27 ( year 2017 ) pages 164--178

    2017

  36. [44]

    Nie , author C

    author L. Nie , author C. Lin , author K. Liao , author Y. Zhang , author S. Liu , author R. Ai , author Y. Zhao , title Eliminating warping shakes for unsupervised online video stitching , in: booktitle European Conference on Computer Vision , organization Springer , year 202...

    2025

  37. [45]

    Liao , author N

    author T. Liao , author N. Li , title Single-perspective warps in natural image stitching , journal IEEE Transactions on Image Processing volume 29 ( year 2020 ) pages 724--735 . :10.1109/TIP.2019.2934344

    2020

  38. [46]

    Zhou , author J

    author B. Zhou , author J. Xie , author Z. Jin , author H. Kong , title Geometry-aware network for unsupervised learning of monocular camera’s ego-motion , journal IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( year 2023 ) pages 1--11 . :10.1109/TITS.2023.3298715

    2023

  39. [47]

    Sun , author Z

    author J. Sun , author Z. Shen , author Y. Wang , author H. Bao , author X. Zhou , title Loftr: Detector-free local feature matching with transformers , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , year 2021 , pp. pages 8922--8931

    2021

  40. [48]

    DeTone , author T

    author D. DeTone , author T. Malisiewicz , author A. Rabinovich , title Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , year 2018 , pp. pages 224--236

    2018

  41. [49]

    Barath , author J

    author D. Barath , author J. Noskova , author M. Ivashechkin , author J. Matas , title Magsac++, a fast, reliable and accurate robust estimator , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , year 2020 , pp. pages 1304--1312

    2020

  42. [50]

    Liu , author Y

    author S. Liu , author Y. Lu , author H. Jiang , author N. Ye , author C. Wang , author B. Zeng , title Unsupervised global and local homography estimation with motion basis learning , journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 45 ( year 2023...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Zhu , author Y

    author C. Zhu , author Y. Yang , author H. Liang , author Z. Dong , author M. Fu , title Uvss: Unified video stabilization and stitching for surround view of tractor-trailer vehicles , in: booktitle 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Jia , author Z

    author Q. Jia , author Z. Li , author X. Fan , author H. Zhao , author S. Teng , author X. Ye , author L. J. Latecki , title Leveraging line-point consistence to preserve structures for wide parallax image stitching , in: booktitle 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision a...

    2021

  45. [53]

    Nie , author C

    author L. Nie , author C. Lin , author K. Liao , author S. Liu , author Y. Zhao , title Parallax-tolerant unsupervised deep image stitching , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , year 2023 , pp. pages 7399--7408

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.