Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On general skew Brownian motions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.08415 v2 pith:GORTB4J4 submitted 2018-12-20 math.PR

classification math.PR
keywords brownianwillmathbbgeneralskewmotionmotionssemi-martingale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The aim of this paper is two-fold. On one hand, we will study the distorted Brownian motion on $\mathbb{R}$, i.e. the diffusion process $X$ associated with a regular and strongly local Dirichlet form obtained by the closure of $\mathscr{E}(f,g)=\frac{1}{2}\int_\mathbb{R} f'(x)g'(x)\rho(x)dx$ for $f,g\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}, \mathfrak{m})$, where $\mathfrak{m}(dx)=\rho(x)dx$ and $\rho$ is a certain positive function. After figuring out the irreducible decomposition of $X$, we will present a characterization of that $X$ becomes a semi-martingale by virtue of so-called Fukushima's decomposition. Meanwhile, it is also called a general skew Brownian motion, which turns out to be a weak solution to the stochastic differential equation with certain $\mu$: \[ dY_t=dW_t+\int_\mathbb{R}\mu(dz) dL^z_t(Y),\quad (*) \] where $(W_t)_{t\geq 0}$ is a standard Brownian motion and $(L^z_t(Y))_{t\geq 0}$ is the symmetric semi-martingale local time of the unknown semi-martingale $Y$ at $z$. On the other hand, the stochastic differential equation (*) will be considered further. The main purpose is to find the conditions on $\mu$ equivalent to that there exist general skew Brownian motions being weak solution to (*). Moreover, the irreducibility and the equivalence in distribution of expected general skew Brownian motions will be characterized. Finally, several special cases will be paid particular attention to and we will prove or disprove the pathwise uniqueness for (*).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools