pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19987 · v1 · pith:GUN4TZNUnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex

Development of an RPC-based gaseous photodetector with picosecond resolution

Simone Garnero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-ex
keywords gaseous photodetectorresistive plate chamberphoton feedbacktime resolutionLaB6 photocathodeelectron discriminationBelle IICherenkov identification
0
0 comments X

The pith

An algorithm suppresses photon feedback in a gaseous photodetector to enable single-electron discrimination and restore picosecond timing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper advances the GasPM, a photodetector that pairs a photocathode with a resistive-plate chamber for high time resolution and Cherenkov-based particle identification. It targets degradation in timing performance caused by secondary signals from ultraviolet photons emitted during gas molecule excitation and de-excitation. Configuration changes, high-frequency readout, and a new discrimination technique for single versus multiple electrons are introduced in an improved beam test setup. An algorithm is developed to suppress the photon feedback, a digitiser is calibrated, and a LaB6 photocathode is tested for ion resistance via cosmic rays. These steps address prior limitations and prepare the detector for further beam tests aimed at background suppression in electromagnetic calorimeters.

Core claim

The author establishes that photon feedback can be efficiently suppressed with a dedicated algorithm when combined with single-versus-multiple electron discrimination and high-frequency signal readout. This combination mitigates the time resolution degradation seen in earlier beam tests of the GasPM. In parallel, cosmic-ray testing qualifies a LaB6 photocathode as resistant to damage from ions drifting backward, making it suitable for future prototypes.

What carries the argument

The photon feedback suppression algorithm applied to signals from the photocathode-resistive plate chamber combination, together with single-versus-multiple electron discrimination.

If this is right

  • Restored time resolution allows the GasPM to suppress beam-induced backgrounds in electromagnetic calorimeters.
  • Single-versus-multiple electron discrimination improves handling of signals with different strengths in particle detection.
  • The LaB6 photocathode supports more durable operation by resisting ion-induced damage in ongoing tests.
  • Pairing the detector with a radiator enables precise charged-particle identification via Cherenkov radiation.
  • The overall design remains scalable and cost-effective for large detector systems in particle physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The feedback suppression method could be adapted to other gaseous detectors that suffer similar secondary-signal problems.
  • If the upcoming beam test succeeds, the technology may find use in timing applications at other high-energy physics facilities.
  • The discrimination approach might be combined with different gas mixtures to further optimize performance.

Load-bearing premise

The main cause of earlier time resolution degradation is ultraviolet photon emission from gas excitations, and the new suppression algorithm plus discrimination method will fix it without other factors becoming limiting.

What would settle it

A beam test of the improved GasPM prototype that shows no recovery of picosecond time resolution or continued presence of secondary signals after applying the suppression algorithm would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19987 by Simone Garnero.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Scheme of particles and interactions in the Standard Model [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: Graphical representation of the Unitarity Triangle [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Figure 1.3: Examples of leading FCNC diagrams [6]. 1.4 Flavour physics to overcome the Standard Model Many physicists find the current understanding of flavour dynamics unsatis￾factory. The observed hierarchies between quark masses and couplings seem too regular to be accidental and the abundance of free parameters (six quark masses and four couplings) suggests the possibility of a deeper, more funda￾mental theory p… view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Pie chart of the cross sections for the main processes produced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Hadron production cross section from e +e − collisions as a func￾tion of the final-state mass. The vertical red line indicates the BB production threshold [20]. Electrons are produced in a thermionic gun with a barium-impregnated tungsten cathode, then accelerated to 7 GeV with a linear accelerator (linac) and injected in the high-energy ring. Positrons are produced by colliding electrons on a tungsten t… view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Illustration of the SuperKEKB collider [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Two-dimensional sketch of the nano-beam mechanism imple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: Top view of Belle II, the beam pipe at IP and final-focus magnets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: ECL layout [29]. The principal axes of the crystals do not point exactly to the nominal interaction point, but they are inclined to prevent photons from escaping through gaps by about 1.3◦ in the θ and ϕ directions in the barrel section, and by about 1.5◦ and about 4◦ in the θ direction in the forward and back￾ward sections. Thallium inside the CsI, shifts the energy of the excitation light into the visi… view at source ↗
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.7. Figure 2.7: Schematic design of a CsI(Tl) crystal with attached readout [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8: Sketch of an off-momentum electron steered into the beam pipe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.9. Figure 2.9: Calorimeter-cluster time distribution for 5 MeV energy deposi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Schematic design of the GasPM [40] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: (Left) Cross-sectional schematic of the GasPM prototype in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Time distribution of GasPM signals from laser test (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Sketch of the photon feedback phenomenon [43] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: DSA-C10-8+ waveform digitiser architecture. For this model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Scheme of the read-out logic and advanced read windows controls. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: ADC distribution for one cell from a 350 mVpp sine wave. the optimal input amplification or attenuation to remain within the board dynamic range is challenging, as excessive attenuation leads to a loss in efficiency due to noise. Because the digitiser will work outside the nominal dynamic range, I consistently extend the calibration over a broader range. To calibrate voltage, I acquire sine waves using t… view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: Digitiser output vs input plot for buffer 0 out of 32640. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_4_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.6. Figure 4.6: 250 mVpp amplitude event after voltage calibration. where the variable x is the input voltage, F = 100 MHz is the known frequency, and A, B and C are the fitting parameters representing ampli￾tude, phase, and offset, respectively. The output saturates fully for negative amplitudes already at −100 mV, while saturation begins from about 150 mV on positive amplitudes. We observe a nearly linear response wit… view at source ↗
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.7. Figure 4.7: Graphical representation of the time difference between the sam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_4_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.8. Figure 4.8: Time fluctuation of the samples acquired by a single cell (number 103) with respect to the sine fit. A Gaussian fit is overlaid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_4_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.10. Figure 4.10: Split pulse signal col￾lected by channel 0 and 1 simul￾taneously, after both voltage and time calibration. 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 t [ns] 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Counts Gaussian fit =161.8 ps, =9.49 ps Rise time difference t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_4_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Command panel of the gas mixing system. The two symmetrical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Sketch of the detector configuration set-up (top view). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Photo of the detector set-up. Electrons come from the left-most [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_5_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Scheme of the trigger circuit that synchronises the two readout [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_5_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: MPPC opened during radiator replacement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_5_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: Example of an oscilloscope display of a beam-test event [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_5_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.7. Figure 5.7: Distribution of hit multiplicity in data taken with a 3-mm radi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_5_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.8. Figure 5.8: Signal, in colour-coded ADC counts, detected in the MPPC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_5_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.9. Figure 5.9: Distribution of hit multiplicity in beam-test data taken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_5_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.10. Figure 5.10: Signal, in colour-coded ADC counts, detected in the MPPC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_5_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.12. Figure 5.12: Distribution of the hit multiplicity after the single￾electron selection. The threshold for a photon hit is set at 200 ADC counts. In contrast, multiple-electron events result in broader spatial distributions of hits and significantly higher total number of photons. Hence, I empiri￾cally require fewer than 7 hit channels and 4500 total ADC counts to select single electron events, as shown by the red lin… view at source ↗
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.13. Figure 5.13: A random sample of 100 signal shapes from the NALU beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_5_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.14
Figure 5.14. Figure 5.14: (Left panel) Pulse-height distribution from beam test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_5_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.15
Figure 5.15. Figure 5.15: Event classified as affected by photon feedback using the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_5_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.16. Figure 5.16: Signal waveforms observed during the beam test and analysed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_5_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.17. Figure 5.17: Distribution of the pulse rise time from 50% to the peak. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_5_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Cosmic-ray test configuration. 6.2 Cosmic ray test 6.2.1 Layout The experimental configuration for the cosmic-ray test has analogies and differences with respect to the beam test ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_6_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: GasPM hit-rate during the first 30 days of the cosmic-ray acqui [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_6_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: Example of an oscilloscope display of an event acquired with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_6_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5: GasPM with MgF2 window. Since the origin of the observed efficiency drop and streamer phenomena, is unclear, we disassemble the GasPM and inspect its internal components. Visible and significant damage affects the photocathode, in the form of a change of colour and the creation of small bubbles on its surface ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_6_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.6. Figure 6.6: LED test setup. ization GasPM signal rates. By comparing the hit rates recorded with the GasPM and the RPC configuration, I estimate the fraction of signal due to ionisation and that due to Cherenkov photons. This test also provides a suitable and safe configuration with no streamer, so that we can safely replace the damaged photocathode with a new one. The first test with the RPC, under the same 176 kV/… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This experimental particle-physics thesis reports the latest developments on the GasPM, a novel gaseous photodetector aimed at suppressing beam-induced backgrounds in the electromagnetic calorimeter for a potential upgrade of the Belle~II experiment. The GasPM technology is based on combining a photocathode with a resistive-plate chamber offering high efficiency, excellent time resolution, and cost-effective scalability. A further advantage is that, combined with a radiator, the GasPM offers precise Cherenkov-based charged-particle identification. As part of a project launched in 2017, this work aims at addressing the degradation in time resolution observed in a previous beam test over what was achieved earlier with laser light. I focus specifically on ultraviolet-photon emission during excitation and de-excitation of the gas molecules, which leads to a secondary signal that in turn spoils time resolution (photon feedback). I design and execute an improved beam test that, along with several configuration changes, newly introduces single-vs-multiple electron discrimination and high-frequency signal readout. In addition, I probe through a cosmic-ray test the quantum efficiency of a new LaB$_6$ photocathode resistant to damage from ions drifting backwards, for use in future beam tests. The principal results are the development of an algorithm to efficiently suppress photon feedback; a preliminary calibration of a novel digitiser; the achievement of discrimination between single- and multiple-electron events; and an early qualification of a LaB$_6$ photocathode. These results are being prepared for showing at the 7th International Workshop on New Photon Detectors organized in Bologna in December 2025 and pave the way for an upcoming beam test of an improved GasPM prototype.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental developments on the GasPM, an RPC-based gaseous photodetector intended for background suppression and Cherenkov PID in a potential Belle II electromagnetic calorimeter upgrade. It identifies UV-photon emission from gas excitation/de-excitation as the source of photon feedback that degraded time resolution in prior beam tests, introduces an algorithm for feedback suppression together with single-versus-multiple electron discrimination and high-frequency readout, and presents a cosmic-ray qualification of a LaB6 photocathode. The principal results are described as the development of the suppression algorithm, a preliminary digitiser calibration, successful single/multiple-electron discrimination, and early LaB6 photocathode qualification, all positioned as preparation for a future improved beam test.

Significance. If the quantitative performance claims are substantiated, the work would represent incremental but useful progress toward scalable, high-time-resolution gaseous photodetectors with ion-resistant photocathodes. The combination of feedback suppression, electron-number discrimination, and LaB6 qualification addresses known practical limitations in gaseous detectors and could inform designs for future collider upgrades requiring picosecond timing and PID.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the new algorithm and configuration changes efficiently suppress photon feedback and restore time resolution rests on an unverified assumption that UV-photon feedback was the dominant cause of prior degradation. No direct isolation of the mechanism (e.g., gas-mixture variation, pressure dependence, or controlled comparison isolating photon vs. ion feedback) is described, leaving open the possibility that electronics bandwidth, photocathode non-uniformity, or other factors dominate.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and results description: no quantitative before/after comparison of time resolution, suppression efficiency, or discrimination performance (with error bars or statistical significance) is provided on the improved beam-test dataset. Without these metrics it is impossible to evaluate whether the reported algorithm and discrimination method actually mitigate the identified problem or introduce new jitter sources.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists principal results without any numerical values, efficiencies, or resolution figures; including at least the achieved time resolution, suppression factor, or discrimination purity would strengthen the summary.
  2. Notation for the LaB6 photocathode (LaB$_6$) is clear, but the manuscript should explicitly state the cosmic-ray test conditions (rate, gas mixture, voltage) when reporting the quantum-efficiency qualification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make revisions to better align the abstract and results description with the preparatory nature of the current work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the new algorithm and configuration changes efficiently suppress photon feedback and restore time resolution rests on an unverified assumption that UV-photon feedback was the dominant cause of prior degradation. No direct isolation of the mechanism (e.g., gas-mixture variation, pressure dependence, or controlled comparison isolating photon vs. ion feedback) is described, leaving open the possibility that electronics bandwidth, photocathode non-uniformity, or other factors dominate.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not include new controlled experiments that directly isolate UV-photon feedback from other potential sources such as electronics bandwidth or photocathode effects. The focus on photon feedback is motivated by our prior beam-test observations of degraded time resolution relative to laser tests, combined with established understanding of gas excitation processes. We will revise the abstract to present the algorithm as a targeted suppression method based on that prior identification, explicitly noting that full verification through mechanism-isolation studies is planned for the upcoming beam test. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results description: no quantitative before/after comparison of time resolution, suppression efficiency, or discrimination performance (with error bars or statistical significance) is provided on the improved beam-test dataset. Without these metrics it is impossible to evaluate whether the reported algorithm and discrimination method actually mitigate the identified problem or introduce new jitter sources.

    Authors: The current manuscript reports the design of the suppression algorithm, the single-versus-multiple electron discrimination technique, high-frequency readout implementation, digitiser calibration, and cosmic-ray qualification of the LaB6 photocathode. These constitute preparatory developments for an improved beam test that has not yet taken place. No quantitative before/after metrics from that test are available in this work. We will revise the abstract and results sections to remove any implication of completed performance restoration and to state clearly that quantitative comparisons with statistical details will be presented after the forthcoming beam test. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental results with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This is an experimental thesis reporting hardware development, configuration changes, an algorithm for photon-feedback suppression, single-vs-multiple electron discrimination, and LaB6 photocathode qualification via cosmic-ray and beam tests. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided text. Claims rest on direct empirical observations rather than any chain that reduces by construction to its own inputs or prior self-citations. The guiding hypothesis about UV-photon feedback is stated as motivation but is not used to define or force any result; external replication of the tests can falsify or confirm the outcomes independently.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract; the work relies on standard detector physics assumptions not enumerated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5825 in / 1107 out tokens · 36590 ms · 2026-05-20T04:13:09.505160+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A model of leptons.Phys

    Steven Weinberg. A model of leptons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 19:1264, 1967

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Sheldon L. Glashow. Partial-symmetries of weak interactions.Nuclear Physics, 22:579, 1961

    work page 1961

  3. [3]

    Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions.Conf

    Abdus Salam. Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions.Conf. Proc. C, 680519:367, 1968

    work page 1968

  4. [4]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout. Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 13:321, 1964

    work page 1964

  5. [5]

    Peter W. Higgs. Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 13:508, 1964

    work page 1964

  6. [6]

    PhD thesis, University of Trieste, 2022.https://arts

    RiccardoManfredi.Measurement of the properties ofB+ →ρ +ρ0 decays at Belle II. PhD thesis, University of Trieste, 2022.https://arts. units.it/handle/11368/3060398

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Proof of the TCP Theorem.Annals of Physics, 2:1, 1957

    Gerhart Lüders. Proof of the TCP Theorem.Annals of Physics, 2:1, 1957

    work page 1957

  8. [8]

    Exclusion Principle, Lorentz Group, and Reversal of Space-time and Charge.Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, page 1, 1955

    Wolfgang Pauli. Exclusion Principle, Lorentz Group, and Reversal of Space-time and Charge.Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, page 1, 1955

    work page 1955

  9. [9]

    C. B. Adams et al. Axion dark matter, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):030001, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Gell-Mann and M

    M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévy. The axial vector current in beta decay.Il Nuovo Cimento, 16:705, 1960

    work page 1960

  12. [12]

    Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays.Phys

    Nicola Cabibbo. Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays.Phys. Rev. Lett., 10:531, 1963

    work page 1963

  13. [13]

    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani. Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry.Phys. Rev. D, 2:1285, 1970. 68

    work page 1970

  14. [14]

    CP-Violation in the Renor- malizableTheoryofWeakInteraction.Prog

    Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa. CP-Violation in the Renor- malizableTheoryofWeakInteraction.Prog. Theor. Phys., 49:652, 1973

    work page 1973

  15. [15]

    R. L. Workman and Others. Review of Particle Physics.PTEP, 2022:083C01, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Parametrization of the kobayashi-maskawa matrix

    Lincoln Wolfenstein. Parametrization of the kobayashi-maskawa matrix. Phys. Rev. Lett., 51:1945, 1983

    work page 1945

  17. [17]

    Jarlskog

    C. Jarlskog. Commutator of the Quark Mass Matrices in the Standard Electroweak Model and a Measure of Maximal CP Violation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 55:1039, 1985

    work page 1985

  18. [18]

    Jarlskog

    C. Jarlskog. A Basis Independent Formulation of the Connection Be- tween Quark Mass Matrices, CP Violation and Experiment.Z. Phys. C, 29:491, 1985

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Accelerator design at SuperKEKB.Prog

    Yukiyoshi Ohnishi et al. Accelerator design at SuperKEKB.Prog. Theo. Exp. Phys., page 03A011, 2013

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Accelerator design at superkekb.Progress of Theoretical and Experi- mental Physics, 2013(3):03A011, 03 2013

    Yukiyoshi Ohnishi, Tetsuo Abe, Toshikazu Adachi, Kazunori Akai, Ya- sushi Arimoto, Kiyokazu Ebihara, Kazumi Egawa, John Flanagan, Hi- toshi Fukuma, Yoshihiro Funakoshi, Kazuro Furukawa, Takaaki Fu- ruya, Naoko Iida, Hiromi Iinuma, Hoitomi Ikeda, Takuya Ishibashi, Masako Iwasaki, Tatsuya Kageyama, Susumu Kamada, Takuya Kami- tani, Ken-ichi Kanazawa, Mitsuo...

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    P. Oddone. Detector Considerations.in D. H. Stork, proceedings of Workshop on Conceptual Design of a Test Linear Collider: Possibilities for a BB Factory, page 423, 1987

    work page 1987

  22. [22]

    Eidelman, A

    S. Eidelman, A. Nefediev, P. Pakhlov, and V. Zhukova. Superfactory of bottomed hadrons belle ii, 12 2020

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Beam-beam issues for colliding schemes with large Piwinski angle and crabbed waist

    Paolo Raimondi et al. Beam-beam issues for colliding schemes with large Piwinski angle and crabbed waist. 2007. 69

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    D. R. Douglas, J. Kewisch, and R. C. York. Betatron Function Parame- terization of Beam Optics Including Acceleration. InProceedings of the 1988 Linear Accelerator Conference, (1988)

    work page 1988

  25. [25]

    Verdu-Andres

    S. Verdu-Andres. Luminosity Geometric Reduction Factor from Collid- ing Bunches with Different Lengths. BNL Report BNL-114409-2017-IR, (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Abe et al

    T. Abe et al. Belle II Technical Design Report. 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Sandilya

    S. Sandilya. Particle Identification at Belle II.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 770(1):012045, 2016

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Aulchenko et al

    V. Aulchenko et al. Electromagnetic calorimeter for belle ii.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 587(1):012045, 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    I Adachi, TE Browder, P Križan, S Tanaka, Y Ushiroda, Belle II Col- laboration, et al. Detectors for extreme luminosity: Belle ii.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 907:46–59, 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Lepton identification in belle ii using observables from the electromagnetic calorimeter and precision trackers.EPJ Web Conf., 245:06023, 2020

    Milesi, Marco, Tan, Justin, and Urquijo, Phillip. Lepton identification in belle ii using observables from the electromagnetic calorimeter and precision trackers.EPJ Web Conf., 245:06023, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Liptak et al

    Zachary J. Liptak et al. Measurements of beam backgrounds in Su- perKEKB Phase 2.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1040:167168, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    The ecl: an overview

    Christopher Hearty. The ecl: an overview. Presentation slides, 2023. Belle II Physics Week, KEK, Japan

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Charlebois, Réjean Fontaine, and Jean-Francois Pratte

    Frédéric Nolet, Samuel Parent, Nicolas Roy, Marc-Olivier Mercier, Serge A. Charlebois, Réjean Fontaine, and Jean-Francois Pratte. Quenching circuit and spad integrated in cmos 65 nm with 7.8 ps fwhm single photon timing resolution.Instruments, 2(4), 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Performance of the mcp-pmts of the top counter in the first beam operation of the belle ii experiment

    Kodai Matsuoka. Performance of the mcp-pmts of the top counter in the first beam operation of the belle ii experiment. InProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on New Photon-Detectors (PD18), page 011020, 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    T. M. Conneely, M. W. U. van Dijk, C. D’Ambrosio, N. Brook, L. Castillo García, E. N. Cowie, D. Cussans, R. Forty, C. Frei, R. Gao, T. Gys, N. Harnew, J. Howorth, J. Lapington, J. Milnes, D. Piedi- grossi, and Slatter. The torch pmt: a close packing, multi-anode, long life mcp-pmt for cherenkov applications.Journal of Instrumentation, 10(05):C05003, May 2015. 70

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    G. N. Gol’tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova, A. Lipatov, A. Semenov, K. Smirnov, B. Voronov, A. Dzardanov, C. Williams, and Roman Sobolewski. Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detec- tor.Applied Physics Letters, 79(6):705–707, 08 2001

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector.Nature Photon., 14(4):250–255, 2020

    Boris Korzh et al. Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector.Nature Photon., 14(4):250–255, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    L. Sohl, S. Aune, J. Bortfeldt, F. Brunbauer, C. David, D. Desforge, G. Fanourakis, M. Gallinaro, F. García, I. Giomataris, T. Gustavs- son, C. Guyot, F.J. Iguaz, M. Kebbiri, K. Kordas, P. Legou, J. Liu, M. Lupberger, I. Manthos, H. Müller, V. Niaouris, E. Oliveri, T. Pa- paevangelou, K. Paraschou, M. Pomorski, F. Resnati, L. Ropelewski, D. Sampsonidis, T...

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Advances in the Large Area Picosecond Photo- Detector (LAPPDTM): 8”×8” MCP-PMT with Capacitively Coupled Readout.JINST, 19(06):P06040, 2024

    Shawn Shin et al. Advances in the Large Area Picosecond Photo- Detector (LAPPDTM): 8”×8” MCP-PMT with Capacitively Coupled Readout.JINST, 19(06):P06040, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Matsuoka, R

    K. Matsuoka, R. Okubo, and Y. Adachi. Demonstration of a 25- picosecond single-photon time resolution with gaseous photomultipli- cation.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1053:168378, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Santonico and R

    R. Santonico and R. Cardarelli. Development of resistive plate counters. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 187(2):377–380, May 1981

    work page 1981

  42. [42]

    Francke and V

    T. Francke and V. Peskov. Photosensitive gaseous detectors and their applications.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment, 525(1):1–5, 2004. Proceedings of the International Conference on Imaging Techniques in Subatomic Physics, Astrophysics, Medicine, Bi- ology and Industry

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Developmentofapicosecond-timingCherenkovdetector using gaseous photomultiplification.JINST, 20(08):C08017, 2025

    R.Okuboetal. Developmentofapicosecond-timingCherenkovdetector using gaseous photomultiplification.JINST, 20(08):C08017, 2025

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Werner Riegler, Christian Lippmann, and Rob Veenhof. Detector physics and simulation of resistive plate chambers.Nuclear Instruments 71 and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrome- ters, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 500(1):144–162, 2003. NIMA Vol 500

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Research on discharges in micropattern and small gap gaseous detectors

    V Peskov and P Fonte. Research on discharges in micropattern and small gap gaseous detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:0911.0463, 2009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Design improvements and first results for the revision 3 of aardvarc waveform sampling system on chip

    Luca Macchiarulo, Isar Mostafanezhad, Gary Varner, Benjamin Rotter, Dean Uehara, Gang Liu, and Christopher Chock. Design improvements and first results for the revision 3 of aardvarc waveform sampling system on chip. In2020 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), pages 1–2, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    D. A. Stricker-Shaver, S. Ritt, and B. J. Pichler. Novel Calibration Method for Switched Capacitor Arrays Enables Time Measurements with Sub-Picosecond Resolution.IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 61(6):3607– 3617, 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    81150A Pulse Function Arbitrary Noise Generator, 2018

    KEYSIGHT. 81150A Pulse Function Arbitrary Noise Generator, 2018. https://shorturl.at/bHAXQ

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    PSPL2600C Datasheet, 2017.https://www.tek.com/en/ datasheet/pspl2600c-pulse-generator-datasheet

    Tektronix. PSPL2600C Datasheet, 2017.https://www.tek.com/en/ datasheet/pspl2600c-pulse-generator-datasheet

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Operational Status of Photon Factory Light Sources

    Tohru Honda, Yukinori Kobayashi, Chikaori Mitsuda, Shinya Naga- hashi, Ryota Takai, and Hiroyuki Takaki. Operational Status of Photon Factory Light Sources. In12th International Particle Accelerator Con- ference, 8 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Easiroc, an easy & versatile readout device for sipm

    Stéphane Callier, Christophe Dela Taille, Gisèle Martin-Chassard, and Ludovic Raux. Easiroc, an easy & versatile readout device for sipm. Physics Procedia, 37:1569–1576, 2012. Proceedings of the 2nd Inter- national Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics (TIPP 2011)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Electron emission characteristics of sputtered lan- thanum hexaboride.Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, A (Vacuum, Surfaces and Films); (USA), 9:3, 05 1991

    S J Mroczkowski. Electron emission characteristics of sputtered lan- thanum hexaboride.Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, A (Vacuum, Surfaces and Films); (USA), 9:3, 05 1991. 72 Acknowledgements I acknowledge KEK and Nagoya University for hosting me during my stay in Japan, the Belle II group at INFN Trieste for its financial support and hospitalit...

    work page 1991