pith. sign in

arxiv: 1207.2906 · v1 · pith:H2VTBZAVnew · submitted 2012-07-12 · 🧮 math.FA · math.LO

An undecidable case of lineability in R^R

classification 🧮 math.FA math.LO
keywords mathfrakundecidablelineabilityrecentlyactuallyalgebrablealmostassuming
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently it has been proved that, assuming that there is an almost disjoint family of cardinality (2^{\mathfrak c}) in (\mathfrak c) (which is assured, for instance, by either Martin's Axiom, or CH, or even $2^{<\mathfrak c=\mathfrak c$}) one has that the set of Sierpi\'nski-Zygmund functions is (2^{\mathfrak{c}})-strongly algebrable (and, thus, (2^{\mathfrak{c}})-lineable). Here we prove that these two statements are actually equivalent and, moreover, they both are undecidable. This would be the first time in which one encounters an undecidable proposition in the recently coined theory of lineability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.