Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Localization of bubbling for high order nonlinear equations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves a sharp pointwise bound for one-bubble families of solutions to high-order critical equations and shows that this bound rules out concentration under dimension-dependent conditions on the Green's function mass and the…

desk verdict Genuinely new and plausible higher-order bubble localization, but two explicitly deferred proof steps are load-bearing; deserves rigorous refereeing before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00531 v1 pith:H4DYMDEE submitted 2024-12-31 math.AP

Frédéric Robert This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J3535J6035B4435J0858J05
keywords one-bubbledecompositionpointwiseestimateshigher-ordercriticalequationsHardypotentialGreen'sfunctionPohozaev-Pucci-SerrinidentityGJMSoperatorbubblingonmanifolds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies families of solutions to the high-order critical equation $P_\alpha u_\alpha=|u_\alpha|^{2^\star-2-\epsilon_\alpha}u_\alpha$ on a compact manifold, assuming the families decompose in Sobolev space into a fixed weak limit $u_0$ plus a single bubble $B_\alpha$. Its main claim is a pointwise localization estimate: the whole family is bounded by a constant times the sup-norm of $u_0$ plus the standard bubble profile centered at the concentration point, with constants independent of $\alpha$. From this estimate the paper derives obstructions: in low dimensions a positive weak limit prevents a standard bubble from forming, while in higher dimensions a sign condition on the trace of the difference between the operator coefficients and those of the conformally invariant GJMS operator is obstructive, and in dimension $2k+1$ with zero weak limit the mass of the Green's function of the limiting operator is decisive. A sympathetic reader would regard the pointwise control, not the nonexistence statements, as the core achievement, because it works for general elliptic operators and sign-changing solutions without any comparison principle.

What carries the argument

The paper turns the nonlinear equation into the linear equation $(P_\alpha-V_\alpha)(u_\alpha-u_0)=f_\alpha$, with $V_\alpha=|u_\alpha|^{2^\star-2-\epsilon_\alpha}$ behaving like a Hardy potential near the concentration point. The load-bearing object is the Green's function of the operator $P_\alpha-V_\alpha$ with a Hardy potential; Theorem 7.2 gives uniform pointwise bounds, including derivative bounds, for this Green's function when the Hardy potential is small. Those bounds rest on a regularity lemma that controls $d_g(x,x_0)^\gamma|\phi(x)|$ for solutions of $(P-V)\phi=0$, and the whole chain is converted into explicit obstruction formulas by the Pohozaev-Pucci-Serrin identity for polyharmonic operators.

What would settle it

Construct a one-bubble family of solutions to a coercive high-order critical equation for which the pointwise bound (7) fails at some scale between $\mu_\alpha$ and the injectivity radius, or exhibit an operator $P$ and a Hardy potential $V$ with $d_g(x,x_0)^{2k}|V(x)|\le \lambda_\gamma$ whose Green's function violates the pointwise estimates of Theorem 7.2; either would directly contradict Theorem 1.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For any family $(u_\alpha)$ solving the equation with $u_\alpha=u_0+B_\alpha+o(1)$ in $H_k^2(M)$, the paper establishes the existence of $C>0$ such that $|u_\alpha(x)|\le C\|u_0\|_\infty^{(2^\star-1)^2}+C(\mu_\alpha^2/(\mu_\alpha^2+d_g(x,x_\alpha)^2))^{(n-2k)/2}$ for all $x$ and $\alpha$, where $\mu_\alpha=|u_\alpha(x_\alpha)|^{-2/(n-2k)}$. The bubble profile term controls the shape of the solution at every scale, and the weak-limit term accounts for the non-concentrated part. The same control, applied at intermediate scales, forces the rescaled functions to converge to an explicit harmonic profile, and insertion into a Pohozaev-Pucci-Serrin identity yields the constraints on the concentration point appearing in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the effective Hardy potential can be made uniformly small outside the bubble scale; if the constant $\lambda_\gamma$ in Theorem 7.2 is exceeded, the Green's function bounds and the final pointwise control collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In dimensions $2k<n<2k+4$, a standard bubble cannot concentrate at a point where the weak limit $u_0(x_0)$ is positive.
  • In dimensions $n\ge 2k+4$, a standard bubble cannot concentrate when the trace of $(A_0^{(k-1)}-A_g^{(k-1)})$ at $x_0$ has the sign forbidden by Theorem 1.1.
  • When $u_0\equiv 0$, a bubble cannot form in dimension $n=2k+1$ if the Green's function mass $m_{P_0}(x_0)$ is positive, and in dimensions $n\ge 2k+2$ if $(A_0^{(k-1)}-A_g^{(k-1)})(x_0)$ is negative definite.
  • The pointwise control implies explicit rescaled asymptotics: at scales between the bubble radius and the injectivity radius, $u_\alpha$ behaves like $K_0 d_g(x,x_\alpha)^{2k-n}$, with $K_0$ determined by the bubble profile.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same Green's-function-with-Hardy-potential machinery could be adapted to prove analogous pointwise controls for multi-bubble decompositions, likely yielding algebraic compatibility conditions among the bubble centers and radii.
  • A testable extension is to use the pointwise bound to derive compactness theorems for high-order critical equations under the sign conditions of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; the paper's estimates provide the missing a priori control that compactness arguments typically require.
  • The regularity lemma for Hardy potentials may transfer to other settings, such as boundary-singular problems or equations posed on stratified spaces, where no Harnack inequality is available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies families of solutions (u_alpha) to high-order critical equations P_alpha u_alpha = |u_alpha|^{2^*-2-eps_alpha} u_alpha on compact manifolds, assuming a one-bubble decomposition u_alpha = u_0 + B_alpha + o(1) in H^2_k. The central aim is the pointwise bubble localization estimate (7), obtained by rewriting the equation linearly with a Hardy-type potential and proving sharp Green's function estimates for P_alpha - V_alpha. From this control the author derives dimension-dependent obstructions to single-bubble concentration, involving the mass of the Green's function, the difference between P_alpha and the GJMS operator, and the Weyl tensor, via polyharmonic Pohozaev-Pucci-Serrin identities.

Significance. If the main estimate (7) is fully established, this is a substantial contribution: it extends the second-order pointwise blow-up theory of Druet-Hebey-Robert to arbitrary order k and to sign-changing solutions, without positivity or comparison-principle assumptions. The proposed mechanism, a Green's function theory for operators with Hardy potentials (Theorems 7.1 and 7.2) and the regularity Lemma 11.1, is promising and goes well beyond previous fourth-order results for positive geometric solutions. However, the manuscript explicitly defers two load-bearing pieces: Step P3's concentration-mass estimates in Section 6 and the derivative estimates of Theorem 7.2 in Section 10. Until those are supplied, the central claim is not fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Step P3 and Step P4] The smallness condition (40) on d_g(x,x_alpha)^{2k}|V_alpha(x)| outside B_{R mu_alpha}(x_alpha) depends on Step P3, but Step P3 is only sketched: after the rescaling around z_alpha, the text states that the needed L^{2*} mass estimates follow as in Chapter 4 of [9] and gives no details. These estimates are required to exclude a second concentration at z_alpha and to separate the main bubble mass. Since [9] is a second-order theory for mostly positive solutions, its adaptation to sign-changing high-order solutions is not automatic. Because (40) is the Hardy-smallness input for Step P5, the proof of the pointwise control (7) collapses unless Step P3 is completed.
  2. [Section 10, Theorem 7.2 and Step P5] Step P5 uses derivative bounds |nabla_y^l G(x,y)| with the asymmetric factor (max/min)^{gamma+l} for all l <= 2k-1, and the boundary-term estimate in Step P5 requires these bounds uniformly in alpha. Section 10 proves only the undifferentiated estimate (87); for the derivative estimates the text says that the same contradiction method works and leaves the details to the reader. It is not checked that a single threshold lambda_gamma works uniformly for all l <= 2k-1. If lambda_gamma has to shrink with l, the fixed R chosen in Step P5 cannot control the boundary terms, and the bootstrap leading to (43) and (7) fails. This is a load-bearing gap, not a routine detail.
  3. [Section 10, uniformity in x_0] Theorem 7.2 states that the estimates are uniform with respect to x_0, and Step P5 applies them with x_0 = x_alpha, which varies with alpha. The contradiction proof in Section 10 fixes x_0 and lets only the operator, the potential, and the points x,y vary. The claimed uniformity in x_0 is therefore asserted rather than demonstrated; since Theorem 1.3 needs constants independent of alpha as x_alpha moves, an explicit compactness argument (or a statement that Theorems 8.1 and 9.1 provide constants independent of x_0) is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 15, first paragraph] The sentence 'Theorems 3.4 and 3.4 are proved in Section 15' should read 'Theorems 3.4 and 3.5'.
  2. [Section 6, Step P5] In the first sentence of Step P5, 'type (SSC)' should be 'type (SCC)' for consistency with Definition 1.1.
  3. [Theorem 3.1, equation (13)] The first term on the right-hand side of (13) appears to be missing the exponent (n-2k)/2 on the denominator; the final estimate in Step P5 has (mu_alpha^nu + d_g(x,x_alpha)^nu)^{-(n-2k)/2}, which is presumably the intended formula.
  4. [Throughout] Families are indexed by alpha > 0 but limits are often written as alpha -> 0; this should be made consistent, for instance by reindexing or by writing alpha -> +infinity everywhere.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the main estimate is derived rather than fitted, though two proof steps are deferred to prior work or left to the reader.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.3 follows from the assumed one-bubble decomposition uα = u0 + Bα + o(1) through independent ingredients: (i) Theorem 5.1 rescales the family and obtains convergence to an entire solution U; (ii) Steps P1-P4 prove the Hardy-type smallness d^{2k}|Vα| ≤ δ outside B_{Rδ μ} by a blow-up argument using the mass estimates (24)-(25), which come from the bubble ansatz rather than from the desired conclusion (7); (iii) Theorems 7.1, 7.2 and Lemma 11.1 construct the Green function for Pα - ηVα and prove pointwise estimates under coercivity checked via the Hardy inequality (19); (iv) Step P5 applies the Green representation formula and Step P6 performs an integral bootstrap with the Green function estimates (159). The final bound (7) is therefore a consequence, not an input. The self-citations are not circular reductions: the appeal to Chapter 4 of Druet-Hebey-Robert [9] in Step P3 and to [13] in Step P6 concern standard k=1 blow-up and integral estimates, and the Green function gradient bounds cited to [47] are standard elliptic-theory facts. The manuscript itself flags two incompleteness points that are rigor gaps, not circularity. In Section 6, Step P3 says: 'Here again the proof follows Chapter 4 of Druet-Hebey-Robert [9]. We sketch the proof since it is similar to the proof of Step P1.' Section 10 ends with: 'The proof of the estimates on the derivative uses the same method by contradiction, with a few more cases to study using regularity theory (Theorem D.2). We leave the details to the reader.' If those deferred estimates fail uniformly, the boundary-term control in Step P5 and the bootstrap to (43)/(7) would collapse, but this is a proof-completeness concern, not a self-referential derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure mathematics paper: no fitted parameters and no invented physical or mathematical entities. The Hardy potential is a well-known class, and the bubble and the 'Weyl tensor times bubble' object are defined from existing notions. The main axioms are classical analytic inequalities and regularity theorems, plus the explicit structural assumption on the operator family.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Sobolev embedding H_k^2(M) subset L^{2*}(M) on compact Riemannian manifolds
    Used throughout, e.g., Eq. (18) in Section 4 and Step 1 of Section 7.
  • standard math Hardy inequality int_M u^2 d_g(.,x0)^{-2k} dv_g <= CH(k) ||u||_{H_k^2}^2
    Proved in Appendix B (Prop B.1, Eq. 145) and used to control Hardy potentials in Sections 7 and 11.
  • standard math Agmon-Douglis-Nirenberg elliptic regularity for polyharmonic operators
    Stated in Appendix D and used throughout for compactness, convergence, and pointwise bounds.
  • domain assumption Scale-invariance and uniqueness of positive finite-energy solutions of Delta^k U = U^{2*-1} on R^n (Wei-Xu [52])
    Justifies the standard bubble ansatz in Definition 2.1, Eq. (8)-(9).
  • standard math Existence and pointwise bounds of the Green's function for coercive polyharmonic operators
    Appendix C, Theorem C.1, used for representation formulas in Sections 6 and 12.
  • standard math Existence of conformal normal coordinates with Ric_{g_p}(p)=0 (Lee-Parker [27])
    Used in Section 14, Eq. (113), to simplify expansions of the operator and metric.
  • domain assumption Uniform coercivity and C^{i,theta} convergence of operator coefficients (type (SCC))
    This is the class of operators studied in Definition 1.1 and is essential for the uniformity of all estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Localization of bubbling for high order nonlinear equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H4DYMDEE

@misc{pith2026250100531,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Localization of bubbling for high order nonlinear equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H4DYMDEE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00531}
}
abstract

We analyze the asymptotic pointwise behavior of families of solutions to the high-order critical equation $$P_\alpha u_\alpha=\Delta_g^k u_\alpha+\hbox{lot}=|u_\alpha|^{2^\star-2-\epsilon_\alpha} u_\alpha\hbox{ in }M$$ that behave like $$u_\alpha=u_0+B_\alpha+o(1)\hbox{ in }H_k^2(M)$$ where $B=(B_\alpha)_\alpha$ is a Bubble, also called a Peak. We give obstructions for such a concentration to occur: depending on the dimension, they involve the mass of the associated Green's function or the difference between $P_\alpha$ and the conformally invariant GJMS operator. The bulk of this analysis is the proof of the pointwise control \begin{equation*} |u_\alpha(x)|\leq C\Vert u_0\Vert_\infty^{(2^\star-1)^2}+C\left(\frac{\mu_\alpha^{2}}{\mu_\alpha^{2 }+d_g(x,x_\alpha)^{2 }}\right)^{\frac{n-2k}{2}}\hbox{ for all }x\in M\hbox{ and }\alpha\in\mathbb{N}, \end{equation*} where $|u_\alpha(x_\alpha)|=\max_M|u_\alpha|\to +\infty$ and $\mu_\alpha:=|u_\alpha(x_\alpha)|^{-\frac{2}{n-2k}}$. The key to obtain this estimate is a sharp control of the Green's function for elliptic operators involving a Hardy potential.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sharp multiscale control for high order nonlinear equations

    math.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For polyharmonic critical equations on compact manifolds, every blowing-up finite-energy family is bounded pointwise, uniformly, by the weak limit plus a sum of standard bubbles.

  2. Optimal Sobolev inequalities of high order with $L^2$-remainder

    math.AP 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For higher-order Sobolev inequalities with the sharp constant and only an L^2 remainder, validity is governed by the manifold's scalar curvature and dimension, with a complete answer for k=2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [9]

    45, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004

    Olivier Druet, Emmanuel Hebey, and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert, Blow-up theory for elliptic PDEs in Riemannian geometry , Mathematical Notes, vol. 45, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004

    work page 2004

  2. [1]

    Agmon, A

    S. Agmon, A. Douglis, and L. Nirenberg, Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundar y conditions. I , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 12 (1959), 623–727

    work page 1959

  3. [2]

    Atkinson and Lambertus A

    Frederick V. Atkinson and Lambertus A. Peletier, Elliptic equations with nearly critical growth, J. Differential Equations 70 (1987), no. 3, 349–365

    work page 1987

  4. [3]

    107 (2014), 118–133

    Laurent Bakri and Jean-Baptiste Casteras, Non-stability of Paneitz-Branson type equations in arbitrary dimensions , Nonlinear Anal. 107 (2014), 118–133

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    Branson, The functional determinant , Lecture Notes Series, vol

    Thomas P. Branson, The functional determinant , Lecture Notes Series, vol. 4, Seoul National University, Research Institute of Mathematics, Global Ana lysis Research Center, Seoul, 1993

    work page 1993

  6. [5]

    Attaining the optimal constant for higher-order Sobolev inequalities on manifolds via asymptotic analysis

    Lorenzo Carletti, Attaining the optimal constant for higher-order Sobolev in equalities on manifolds via asymptotic analysis (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09234

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Differential Geom

    Olivier Druet, From one bubble to several bubbles: the low-dimensional cas e, J. Differential Geom. 63 (2003), no. 3, 399–473. [7] , Compactness for Yamabe metrics in low dimensions , Int. Math. Res. Not. 23 (2004), 1143–1191

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    PDE 2 (2009), no

    Olivier Druet and Emmanuel Hebey, Stability for strongly coupled critical elliptic systems i n a fully inhomogeneous medium , Anal. PDE 2 (2009), no. 3, 305–359. LOCALIZATION OF BUBBLING FOR HIGH ORDER NONLINEAR EQUATION S 59

    work page 2009

Show all 51 references
  1. [10]

    Energy function and solutions of bounded en ergy in the conformally flat case, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl

    Veronica Felli, Emmanuel Hebey, and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert , Fourth order equations of critical Sobolev growth. Energy function and solutions of bounded en ergy in the conformally flat case, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 12 (2005), no. 2, 171–213

    2005

  2. [11]

    Robin Graham, The ambient metric , Annals of Mathematics Stud- ies, vol

    Charles Fefferman and C. Robin Graham, The ambient metric , Annals of Mathematics Stud- ies, vol. 178, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2 012

  3. [12]

    1991, Springer-Verlag , Berlin, 2010

    Filippo Gazzola, Hans-Christoph Grunau, and Guido Swe ers, Polyharmonic boundary value problems, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1991, Springer-Verlag , Berlin, 2010. Positivity preserving and nonlinear higher order elliptic equations i n bounded domains

    1991

  4. [13]

    Nassif Ghoussoub and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert,The Hardy-Schr¨ odinger operator with interior singu- larity: the remaining cases , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 5, Paper No. 149, 54

    2017

  5. [14]

    Differential Equations 320 (2022), 510–557

    Nassif Ghoussoub, Saikat Mazumdar, and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert, The Hardy-Schr¨ odinger operator on the Poincar´ e ball: compactness, multiplicity, and stab ility of the Pohozaev obstruction , J. Differential Equations 320 (2022), 510–557

    2022

  6. [15]

    1415, 510–557

    , Multiplicity and stability of the Pohozaev obstructions fo r Hard-Schr¨ odinger equa- tions with boundary singularity , Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 285 (2023), no. 1415, 510–557

    2023

  7. [16]

    Georges Giraud, Sur le probl` eme de Dirichlet g´ en´ eralis´ e (deuxi` eme m´ emoire), Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 46 (1929), 131–245 (French)

    1929

  8. [17]

    Robin Graham, Ralph Jenne, Lionel J

    C. Robin Graham, Ralph Jenne, Lionel J. Mason, and Georg e A. J. Sparling, Conformally invariant powers of the Laplacian. I. Existence , J. London Math. Soc. (2) 46 (1992), no. 3, 557–565

    1992

  9. [18]

    Gursky and Andrea Malchiodi, A strong maximum principle for the Paneitz operator and a non-local flow for the Q-curvature, J

    Matthew J. Gursky and Andrea Malchiodi, A strong maximum principle for the Paneitz operator and a non-local flow for the Q-curvature, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), no. 9, 2137–2173

    2015

  10. [19]

    Zheng-Chao Han, Asymptotic approach to singular solutions for nonlinear el liptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 8 (1991), no. 2, 159–174

    1991

  11. [20]

    5, New York University, C ourant Institute of Mathemat- ical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Pr ovidence, RI, 1999

    Emmanuel Hebey, Nonlinear analysis on manifolds: Sobolev spaces and inequa lities, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 5, New York University, C ourant Institute of Mathemat- ical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Pr ovidence, RI, 1999

    1999

  12. [21]

    , Sharp Sobolev inequalities of second order , J. Geom. Anal. 13 (2003), no. 1, 145–162

    2003

  13. [22]

    , Compactness and stability for nonlinear elliptic equation s, Zurich Lectures in Ad- vanced Mathematics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2014

    2014

  14. [23]

    Emmanuel Hebey and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert,Asymptotic analysis for fourth order Paneitz equa- tions with critical growth , Adv. Calc. Var. 4 (2011), no. 3, 229–275

    2011

  15. [24]

    Emmanuel Hebey, Fr´ ed´ eric Robert, and Yuliang W en,Compactness and global estimates for a fourth order equation of critical Sobolev growth arising f rom conformal geometry, Commun. Contemp. Math. 8 (2006), no. 1, 9–65

    2006

  16. [25]

    Emmanuel Hebey and Michel Vaugon, The best constant problem in the Sobolev embedding theorem for complete Riemannian manifolds , Duke Math. J. 79 (1995), no. 1, 235–279

    1995

  17. [26]

    Khuri, Fernando C

    Marcus A. Khuri, Fernando C. Marques, and Richard M. Sch oen, A compactness theorem for the Yamabe problem , J. Differential Geom. 81 (2009), no. 1, 143–196

    2009

  18. [27]

    Lee and Thomas H

    John M. Lee and Thomas H. Parker, The Yamabe problem , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 17 (1987), no. 1, 37–91

    1987

  19. [28]

    YanYan Li and Jingang Xiong, Compactness of conformal metrics with constant Q-curvature. I, Adv. Math. 345 (2019), 116–160

    2019

  20. [29]

    YanYan Li and Lei Zhang, Compactness of solutions to the Yamabe problem. III , J. Funct. Anal. 245 (2007), no. 2, 438–474

    2007

  21. [30]

    Zhu, Yamabe type equations on three-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, Commun

    YanYan Li and Meijun J. Zhu, Yamabe type equations on three-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, Commun. Contemp. Math. 1 (1999), no. 1, 1–50

    1999

  22. [31]

    Marques, A priori estimates for the Yamabe problem in the non-locally confor- mally flat case , J

    Fernando C. Marques, A priori estimates for the Yamabe problem in the non-locally confor- mally flat case , J. Differential Geom. 71 (2005), no. 2, 315–346

    2005

  23. [32]

    Saikat Mazumdar and J´ erˆ ome V´ etois,Existence results for the higher-order Q-curvature equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 63 (2024), no. 6, Paper No. 151, 29. 60 FR ´ED ´ERIC ROBERT

    2024

  24. [33]

    Hussein Mesmar and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert, Concentration analysis for elliptic critical equations with no boundary control: ground-state blow-up , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 17 (2024), no. 4, 1599–1620

    2024

  25. [34]

    Anna Maria Micheletti, Angela Pistoia, and J´ erˆ ome V´etois, Blow-up solutions for asymptoti- cally critical elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58 (2009), no. 4, 1719–1746

    2009

  26. [35]

    Zametki 67 (2000), no

    Enzo Mitidieri, A simple approach to Hardy inequalities , Mat. Zametki 67 (2000), no. 4, 563–572 (Russian, with Russian summary); English transl., Math. Notes 67 (2000), no. 3-4, 479–486

    2000

  27. [36]

    Paneitz, A quartic conformally covariant differential operator for a rbitrary pseudo-Riemannian manifolds (summary) , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    Stephen M. Paneitz, A quartic conformally covariant differential operator for a rbitrary pseudo-Riemannian manifolds (summary) , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 4 (2008), Paper 036, 3

    2008

  28. [37]

    Angela Pistoia and Giusi Vaira, On the stability for Paneitz-type equations , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 14 (2013), 3133–3158

    2013

  29. [38]

    Pohoˇ zaev, On the eigenfunctions of the equation ∆ u + λf (u) = 0, Dokl

    Stanislas I. Pohoˇ zaev, On the eigenfunctions of the equation ∆ u + λf (u) = 0, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 165 (1965), 36–39 (Russian)

    1965

  30. [39]

    Bruno Premoselli, Towers of bubbles for Yamabe-type equations and for the Br´ e zis-Nirenberg problem in dimensions n ≥ 7, J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 3, Paper No. 73, 65

    2022

  31. [40]

    , A priori estimates for finite-energy sign-changing blowing -up solutions of critical elliptic equations , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 6 (2024), 5212–5273

    2024

  32. [41]

    Bruno Premoselli and Fr´ ed´ eric Robert,One-bubble nodal blow-up for asymptotically critical stationary Schr¨ odinger-type equations, Journal of Functional Analysis, to appear

  33. [42]

    Bruno Premoselli and J´ erˆ ome V´ etois,Stability and instability results for sign-changing solu- tions to second-order critical elliptic equations , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 167 (2022), 257–293

    2022

  34. [43]

    , Sign-changing blow-up for the Yamabe equation at the lowest energy level , Adv. Math. 410 (2022), Paper No. 108769, 50

    2022

  35. [44]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07823

    , Nonexistence of minimizers for the second conformal eigenv alue near the round sphere in low dimensions . https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07823

    arXiv

  36. [45]

    Patrizia Pucci and James Serrin, A general variational identity , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 35 (1986), no. 3, 681–703

    1986

  37. [46]

    Math., vol

    Fr´ ed´ eric Robert,Admissible Q-curvatures under isometries for the conformal GJMS opera- tors, Nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations, Conte mp. Math., vol. 540, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 241–259

    2011

  38. [47]

    Unpublished notes

    , Existence et asymptotiques optimales des fonctions de Gree n des op´ erateurs ellip- tiques d’ordre deux (Existence and optimal asymptotics of t he Green ’s functions of second- order elliptic operators) (2010). Unpublished notes

    2010

  39. [48]

    Partial Differential Equations 38 (2013), no

    Fr´ ed´ eric Robert and J´ erˆ ome V´ etois,Sign-changing blow-up for scalar curvature type equa- tions, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 38 (2013), no. 8, 1437–1465

    2013

  40. [49]

    , Blowing-up solutions for 2nd-order critical elliptic equa tions: the impact of the scalar curvature, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2 (2023), 901–931

    2023

  41. [50]

    Schoen, Notes from graduate lectures in Stanford University (1988)

    Richard M. Schoen, Notes from graduate lectures in Stanford University (1988)

    1988

  42. [51]

    Richard Schoen and Dong Zhang, Prescribed scalar curvature on the n-sphere, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 4 (1996), no. 1, 1–25

    1996

  43. [52]

    Juncheng W ei and Xingwang Xu, Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations , Math. Ann. 313 (1999), no. 2, 207–228. Fr´ed´eric Robert, Institut ´Elie Cartan, Universit ´e de Lorraine, BP 70239, F-54506 V andœuvre-l`es-Nancy, France Email address ...

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.