Elliptic Problems Involving Mixed Local-Nonlocal Operator in the Hyperbolic Space

Diksha Gupta; Konijeti Sreenadh

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 52 references

Elliptic Problems Involving Mixed Local-Nonlocal Operator in the Hyperbolic Space

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On hyperbolic space, the mixed local-nonlocal equation $-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N}u+(-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N})^s u-\lambda u=|u|^{p-1}u$ has mountain-pass weak solutions for subcritical $p$, and the critical perturbed problem has a nontrivial…

desk verdict The subcritical result is a genuine first and mostly sound; the critical theorem is honest but conditional on an unverified energy inequality, so the paper's headline critical existence is not yet an existence theorem for any concrete parameter range. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12936 v1 pith:H4WRU3CR submitted 2025-05-19 math.AP

Diksha Gupta , Konijeti Sreenadh This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35B0935B3835J2035J6135R01

keywords mixedlocal-nonlocaloperatorhyperbolicspacefractionalLaplaciancriticalexponentNeharimanifoldmountainpasstheoremradialsymmetrySobolevembedding

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a mixed local-nonlocal elliptic equation on the hyperbolic space $\mathbb{B}^N$, with Laplace-Beltrami term $-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N}$ plus fractional Laplacian $(-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N})^s$ for $0

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reduction to radial functions in the subspace $H^1_r(\mathbb{B}^N)$. Symmetrization maps an arbitrary function to a radial decreasing function while preserving $L^q$ norms and, by the rearrangement inequality for the fractional seminorm, not increasing the mixed energy; the compact embedding $H^1_r(\mathbb{B}^N)\hookrightarrow L^q(\mathbb{B}^N)$ for $2<q<2^*$ then repairs the compactness lost to hyperbolic translations. In the critical problem, the decisive object is the best constant $S_{\lambda,s}$ of the mixed Sobolev embedding: the mountain-pass level is trapped below $\frac{1}{N}S_{\lambda,s}^{N/2}$, which rules out concentration of the Palais-Smale sequence at zero. The kernel $K_s(d(x,y))$, positive and strictly decreasing in geodesic distance, carries the nonlocal part of the energy through the whole argument.

What would settle it

Compute the fractional seminorm of the symmetric-decreasing rearrangement of an explicit nonradial function, say $u(x)=x_1 e^{-d(x,0)}$, using the kernel $K_s$; one case with $[u^*]_s>[u]_s$ would break the symmetrization step in Theorem 1.1. For Theorem 1.2, evaluate $\sup_{\zeta\ge 0}J(\zeta u_0)$ for, say, $N=3$, $s=\frac{1}{2}$, and a natural radial candidate $u_0$; if the value is at least $\frac{1}{N}S_{\lambda,s}^{N/2}$, that candidate does not verify the conditional hypothesis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the mixed local-nonlocal equation $-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N}u+(-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N})^s u-\lambda u=|u|^{p-1}u$ on $\mathbb{B}^N$ admits a weak solution for every $0<s<1$, $\lambda<\frac{(N-1)^2}{4}$, and $1<p<2^*-1$, where $2^*=\frac{2N}{N-2}$. The solution is found as a minimizer of the energy on the Nehari manifold, is a mountain-pass weak solution, and every such minimizer is radially symmetric up to a hyperbolic translation. For the critical perturbed right-hand side $|u|^{2^*-2}u+|u|^{p-1}u$, the paper proves that a nontrivial radial solution exists provided some nonnegative radial function $u_0$ satisfies the energy bound $\sup_{\zeta\ge 0} J(\zeta u_0)<\frac{1}{N}S_{\lambda,s}^{N/2}$, where $S_{\lambda,s}$ is the best constant in the associated Sobolev embedding. The variational argument goes through because $H^1(\mathbb{B}^N)$ embeds continuously into the fractional space $H^s(\mathbb{B}^N)$ and because radial functions recover compactness in the subcritical range.

Load-bearing premise

The subcritical proof assumes, without proof here, that symmetrization never increases the fractional hyperbolic seminorm, and the critical theorem assumes that some radial test function satisfies the energy bound (1.2); if either premise fails, the corresponding existence result collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every $\lambda<\frac{(N-1)^2}{4}$ and $1<p<2^*-1$, the subcritical problem has a weak solution, and least-energy solutions on the Nehari manifold are radially symmetric up to hyperbolic translations.
The mountain-pass level equals the Nehari minimization level, so the solution obtained is a mountain-pass critical point rather than only a constrained minimizer.
If the energy condition (1.2) holds for some radial $u_0$, the critical perturbed problem has a nontrivial radial solution.
The continuous embedding $H^1(\mathbb{B}^N)\hookrightarrow H^s(\mathbb{B}^N)$ holds for every $0<s<1$, making $H^1(\mathbb{B}^N)$ the natural space for variational arguments with the mixed operator.
A weak maximum principle holds for $-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N}+(-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N})^s-\lambda$, so weak solutions of $Lu\ge 0$ are nonnegative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the energy threshold (1.2) is naturally testable by concentrating a Euclidean-like bubble at a point, because $K_s$ behaves like $|x-y|^{-N-2s}$ at short distances; verifying one example for some $N,s,\lambda$ would turn Theorem 1.2 into an unconditional existence result in that case.
Editorial inference: if the missing rearrangement inequality for $K_s$ is supplied, the symmetry statement in Theorem 1.1 becomes unconditional and, together with the weak maximum principle, would imply that the constructed solutions are positive.
Editorial inference: because the fractional seminorm on the hyperbolic space has the same short-distance singularity as the Euclidean one, the compactness analysis for the critical problem is likely to reproduce the two-profile decomposition known for local critical problems in the hyperbolic space, one profile being a Euclidean bubble and the other a hyperbolic ground state.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The subcritical half of this paper is a genuine new result—the first existence theory for the mixed local-nonlocal operator -Δ_{B^N} + (-Δ_{B^N})^s on hyperbolic space—and the proof strategy is mostly standard but clean. The critical half is an honest conditional theorem whose hypothesis is never verified; as written, Theorem 1.2 does not establish critical existence for a single concrete choice of λ, p, s, N. That is the main thing to know.

The best technical piece is the kernel analysis in Lemma 2.1, where the authors prove the hyperbolic kernel is decreasing and use it to control the fractional seminorm by the H¹ norm. Their kernel proof of the H¹-to-H^s embedding is useful, especially for N=2, where the Plancherel route in Remark 2.2 is restricted to N≥3. The weak maximum principle is a nice aside. The subcritical proof via the Nehari manifold, mountain pass, and radial compactness looks sound; the one load-bearing external input is the rearrangement inequality for the hyperbolic fractional seminorm, cited to a sphere paper and to Baernstein rather than proved. If the cited result genuinely covers two-point homogeneous spaces, fine; if not, the radial reduction and the strict inequality in the symmetry proof need a short proof in this setting.

The critical theorem is the larger soft spot. Condition (1.2) is never instantiated: no construction of u₀, no parameter range, no indication that the energy threshold is attainable. The proof steps are internally consistent, but the result is explicitly conditional, and the abstract sells it as establishing existence for critical nonlinearities without flagging that the theorem may have empty scope. That mismatch matters. The claimed novelty of the H¹-to-H^s embedding is also overstated, since Remark 2.2 shows it is immediate from Plancherel for N≥3.

I would send this to a serious referee rather than desk-reject. The subcritical theorem deserves to be in the literature once the rearrangement inequality is checked and either proved or clearly traced to a directly applicable source. The critical theorem needs a concrete verification of (1.2) or a rewrite presenting it as a conditional contribution with the verification left as an open problem. The paper is not a takedown; it is a solid subcritical paper with an over-ambitious critical wrapper.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies two semilinear elliptic problems on the hyperbolic space B^N involving the mixed local-nonlocal operator -Δ_{B^N} + (-Δ_{B^N})^s, with 0<s<1. For the subcritical problem (P_{λ,s}) with 1<p<2*-1 and λ<(N-1)^2/4, the authors prove the existence of a mountain-pass weak solution in H^1(B^N) and show that every minimizer on the Nehari manifold is radially symmetric up to hyperbolic translations (Theorem 1.1). For the critical perturbed problem (P~_{λ,s}), they prove the existence of a nontrivial radial solution under the assumption that there exists a nonnegative radial function u0 satisfying the energy inequality (1.2) (Theorem 1.2). The paper also establishes an embedding H^1(B^N)↪H^s(B^N) via kernel estimates and a weak maximum principle.

Significance. If the results hold, the subcritical theorem is a meaningful extension of known Euclidean and hyperbolic results to the mixed local-nonlocal setting, and the H^1↪H^s embedding is a useful tool. The paper contains careful variational setups, a proof of kernel monotonicity, and a weak maximum principle, which are concrete strengths. However, the critical existence theorem is conditional on condition (1.2), which is never instantiated, and the radial reduction relies on a rearrangement inequality that is cited rather than proved for the hyperbolic fractional seminorm. These two points currently limit the paper's contribution and need to be addressed.

major comments (2)

[§4, Theorem 1.2, condition (1.2)] The critical existence theorem is conditional on the existence of a nontrivial nonnegative radial function u0 satisfying sup_{ζ≥0} J(ζu0) < (1/N) S_{λ,s}^{N/2}. The paper never verifies this condition for any admissible choice of λ, p, s, or N, nor does it provide a construction or heuristic for such u0. Consequently, Theorem 1.2 does not establish critical existence for any concrete parameter range and may be vacuously true. This is load-bearing for the paper's critical-existence claim; the authors should either verify (1.2) in a nontrivial range (for instance, using the subcritical solution or a bubble-type test function) or explicitly recast the critical result as conditional and discuss its scope.
[§3, proof of Theorem 1.1] The radial reduction of the minimizing sequence and the symmetry conclusion in part (3) rely on rearrangement inequalities of the form ∫ |(-Δ_{B^N})^{s/2}u*|^2 ≤ ∫ |(-Δ_{B^N})^{s/2}u|^2, and their strict versions, which are cited to [4, Theorem 3] and [2] without proof or adaptation to the hyperbolic space. Reference [4] is a paper on the sphere, and no specific theorem for the hyperbolic fractional seminorm with the kernel K_s is stated. Since Theorem 1.1(1) and (3) depend on these inequalities, the proof has a gap; the authors should either prove the rearrangement inequality for the hyperbolic fractional seminorm (using Lemma 2.1 and a Riesz rearrangement inequality on two-point homogeneous spaces) or provide a precise reference covering this case.

minor comments (3)

[§2, Theorem 2.1 proof] The displayed estimates for I1, I2, and I3 scale linearly in ‖f‖_{L^2} and ‖∇f‖_{L^2}, whereas the left-hand side [f]_s^2 is quadratic; for example, the bound 'I1 ≤ C‖∇f‖_{L^2}' should read 'I1 ≤ C‖∇f‖_{L^2}^2', and similarly for I2. As written, the proof is not formally correct, although the fix is straightforward.
[§2, equation (2.3)] The displayed formula for the constant C(N,s) is typeset in a garbled way and is unreadable; please correct the typesetting so that the definition is unambiguous.
[Abstract and introduction] The abstract states that the paper establishes existence results 'under appropriate conditions' but does not mention that the critical result is conditional on condition (1.2); the abstract should reflect this important caveat.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: subcritical proof is self-contained given external cited estimates, and the critical theorem is explicitly conditional on assumption (1.2) rather than deriving it from its conclusion.

full rationale

The subcritical Theorem 1.1 follows a standard Nehari/mountain-pass argument. The key ingredients are external to the authors: Lemma 3.1 (compact radial embedding) is cited to Bhakta–Sandeep [8]; Lemma 2.1 (kernel positivity and monotonicity) is proved using [37] and [3]; and the rearrangement comparison for the fractional seminorm is cited to Beckner [4] and Baernstein [2]. None of these are self-citations, and the energy functional I is defined directly from the weak formulation while the equality c = c* is proved by the usual path-crossing argument, not assumed. The critical Theorem 1.2 is explicitly conditional: the paper states 'suppose there exists a nontrivial, nonnegative radial function u0... such that (1.2) sup_{ζ≥0} J(ζu0) < (1/N)S_{λ,s}^{N/2}' and then proves that this assumption forces the mountain-pass level below the compactness threshold. The threshold comparison uses S_{λ,s} as the infimum defining the Sobolev quotient, so it is not imported from the desired conclusion. The fact that condition (1.2) is never instantiated for concrete parameter choices is a genuine scope/correctness concern about whether Theorem 1.2 currently has nonempty applicability, but it is not circularity: the assumption is neither equivalent to the existence conclusion nor renamed as a result. Similarly, the cited-but-unproved rearrangement inequality for the hyperbolic fractional seminorm is a verification gap, not a circular reduction, because the supporting result is external and not derived from the paper's target theorem. The many self-citations in the introduction ([26,28,6,27,7,35]) are contextual and carry no step of the proofs. Hence no circular step can be exhibited from the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on external facts about the hyperbolic kernel and rearrangement theory, plus the unverified critical energy assumption. No new numerical parameters are fitted, and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Kernel properties: K_s in (2.3) is positive, strictly decreasing in geodesic distance, with asymptotics K_s(rho) approximately rho^{-N-2s} near 0 and exponential decay at infinity (from [37] and [3]).
Used in Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.1 to prove the embedding H^1 into H^s; also used for rearrangement and monotonicity arguments. The paper cites these results but does not prove them.
domain assumption Riesz rearrangement inequality on hyperbolic space: for the mixed Dirichlet form, [u*]_s <= [u]_s and ||grad u*||_2 <= ||grad u||_2 with equality only for translates.
Invoked in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to pass to radial minimizing sequences and to prove radial symmetry. The citation [4, Theorem 3] treats the sphere S^n, not the hyperbolic kernel K_s; the paper gives no proof for this setting.
domain assumption Radial compactness: H^1_r(B^N) embeds compactly into L^q(B^N) for 2 < q < 2* (Lemma 3.1).
Quoted from [8] (Bhakta and Sandeep). Load-bearing for the subcritical existence proof.
ad hoc to paper Critical assumption (1.2): there exists a nontrivial, nonnegative radial u0 with sup_{zeta>=0} J(zeta u0) < (1/N) S_{lambda,s}^{N/2}.
Assumed in Theorem 1.2. The paper never verifies this condition for any parameter range, so the critical existence result is conditional.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elliptic Problems Involving Mixed Local-Nonlocal Operator in the Hyperbolic Space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H4WRU3CR

@misc{pith2026250512936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elliptic Problems Involving Mixed Local-Nonlocal Operator in the Hyperbolic Space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H4WRU3CR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12936}
}

abstract

This paper explores the existence of solutions to a class of nonlinear elliptic equations involving a mixed local-nonlocal operator of the form $-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N} + (-\Delta_{\mathbb{B}^N})^s$, with $0 < s < 1$, set in the hyperbolic space $\mathbb{B}^N$. By employing variational methods, we address both subcritical and critical nonlinearities, establishing the existence of weak solutions under appropriate conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

[2]

Symmetrization in analysis , volume 36 of New Mathematical Mono- graphs

Albert Baernstein, II. Symmetrization in analysis , volume 36 of New Mathematical Mono- graphs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019. With David D rasin and Richard S. Laugesen, With a foreword by Walter Hayman

work page 2019
[4]

Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson sem igroup, and analysis on the sphere Sn

William Beckner. Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson sem igroup, and analysis on the sphere Sn. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 89(11):4816–4819, 1992

work page 1992
[1]

Rabinowitz

Antonio Ambrosetti and Paul H. Rabinowitz. Dual variati onal methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Functional Analysis , 14:349–381, 1973

work page 1973
[3]

Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds

Valeria Banica, María del Mar González, and Mariel Sáez. Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 31(2):681–712, 2015

work page 2015
[5]

S tability and qualitative properties of radial solutions of the Lane-Emden-Fowler equation on Riem annian models

Elvise Berchio, Alberto Ferrero, and Gabriele Grillo. S tability and qualitative properties of radial solutions of the Lane-Emden-Fowler equation on Riem annian models. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 102(1):1–35, 2014

work page 2014
[6]

A global com- pactness result and multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical exponent problems in the hyperbolic space

Mousomi Bhakta, Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and Alok K umar Sahoo. A global com- pactness result and multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical exponent problems in the hyperbolic space. Communications in Contemporary Mathematics , page 2450045, 2025/05/10 2024

work page 2025
[7]

Poincar\'e-Sobolev equations with the critical exponent and a potential in the hyperbolic space

Mousomi Bhakta, Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and Alok K umar Sahoo. Poincaré- sobolev equations with the critical exponent and a potentia l in the hyperbolic space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03164, 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[8]

Mousomi Bhakta and K. Sandeep. Poincaré–sobolev equati ons in the hyperbolic space. Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 44(1):247–269, 2012

work page 2012

Show all 52 references

[9]

A brezis-nirenberg type result for mixed local and nonlocal operators

Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, and E ugenio Vecchi. A brezis-nirenberg type result for mixed local and nonlocal operators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07502, 2022

2022 arXiv
[10]

Mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum principles

Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, and Eugenio Vecchi. Mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum principles. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 47(3):585–629, 2022

2022
[11]

Semilinear elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal operators

Stefano Biagi, Eugenio Vecchi, Serena Dipierro, and En rico Valdinoci. Semilinear elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal operators. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A , 151(5):1611–1641, 2021

2021
[12]

Classiﬁcation of radial solutions to the Emden-Fowler equation on the hyperb olic space

Matteo Bonforte, Filippo Gazzola, Gabriele Grillo, an d Juan Luis Vázquez. Classiﬁcation of radial solutions to the Emden-Fowler equation on the hyperb olic space. Calc. Var. Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 46(1-2):375–401, 2013

2013
[13]

Bonheure and J

D. Bonheure and J. Van Schaftingen. Groundstates for a c lass of nonlinear choquard equations with mixed local and nonlocal terms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 148(5):2061–2072, 2020. 28 D. GUPTA AND K. SREENADH

2020
[14]

Brezis and L

H. Brezis and L. Nirenberg. Positive solutions of nonli near elliptic equations involving critical sobolev exponents. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 36:437–477, 1983

1983
[15]

Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents

Haïm Brézis and Louis Nirenberg. Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 36(4):437–477, 1983

1983
[16]

Friedemann Brock and Alexander Yu. Solynin. An approac h to symmetrization via polariza- tion. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 352(4):1759–1796, 2000

2000
[17]

Nonli near scalar ﬁeld equations involv- ing the fractional Laplacian

Jaeyoung Byeon, Ohsang Kwon, and Jinmyoung Seok. Nonli near scalar ﬁeld equations involv- ing the fractional Laplacian. Nonlinearity, 30(4):1659–1681, 2017

2017
[18]

An extension proble m related to the fractional Laplacian

Luis Caﬀarelli and Luis Silvestre. An extension proble m related to the fractional Laplacian. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 32(7-9):1245–1260, 2007

2007
[19]

Fractional sobolev spaces on riemann- ian manifolds

Michele Caselli, Enric Florit-Simon, and Joaquim Serr a. Fractional sobolev spaces on riemann- ian manifolds. Mathematische Annalen , 390(4):6249–6314, 2024

2024
[20]

Castorina, I

D. Castorina, I. Fabbri, G. Mancini, and K. Sandeep. Har dy-Sobolev extremals, hyperbolic symmetry and scalar curvature equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 246(3):1187–1206, 2009

2009
[21]

Fracti onal Laplacian in conformal geom- etry

Sun-Yung Alice Chang and María del Mar González. Fracti onal Laplacian in conformal geom- etry. Adv. Math., 226(2):1410–1432, 2011

2011
[22]

Riemannian geometry—a modern introduction , volume 108 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics

Isaac Chavel. Riemannian geometry—a modern introduction , volume 108 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

1993
[23]

W. Chen, P. Felmer, and A. Quaas. Large solutions to elli ptic equations involving fractional laplacian. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire , 36(3):637–654, 2019

2019
[24]

I. Ekeland. On the variational principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 47:324–353, 1974

1974
[25]

M. M. Fall and E. Valdinoci. Uniqueness and nondegenera cy of positive solutions of fractional elliptic equations. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 24(6):Paper No. 2150037, 2022

2022
[26]

Sreenadh

Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and K. Sreenadh. Existen ce of high energy-positive solutions for a class of elliptic equations in the hyperbolic space. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(3):Paper No. 79, 27, 2023

2023
[27]

Sreenadh

Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and K. Sreenadh. Multipl icity of positive solutions for a class of nonhomogeneous elliptic equations in the hyperbolic spa ce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics , page 1–39, 2024

2024
[28]

Sreenadh

Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and K. Sreenadh. On a clas s of elliptic equations with critical perturbations in the hyperbolic space. Asymptot. Anal., 138(4):225–253, 2024

2024
[29]

Sign changing solu tions of the brezis-nirenberg problem in the hyperbolic space

Debdip Ganguly and Sandeep Kunnath. Sign changing solu tions of the brezis-nirenberg problem in the hyperbolic space. Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 50(1):69–91, 2014

2014
[30]

Nondegeneracy of p ositive solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in the hyperbolic space

Debdip Ganguly and Kunnath Sandeep. Nondegeneracy of p ositive solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in the hyperbolic space. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 17(1):1450019, 13, 2015

2015
[31]

Mixed local and nonlocal Sobolev inequalities with extremal and associated quasilinear singular elliptic pro blems

Prashanta Garain and Alexander Ukhlov. Mixed local and nonlocal Sobolev inequalities with extremal and associated quasilinear singular elliptic pro blems. Nonlinear Anal., 223:Paper No. 113022, 35, 2022

2022
[32]

L ayer solutions for the fractional Laplacian on hyperbolic space: existence, uniqueness and q ualitative properties

María del Mar González, Mariel Sáez, and Yannick Sire. L ayer solutions for the fractional Laplacian on hyperbolic space: existence, uniqueness and q ualitative properties. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 193(6):1823–1850, 2014

2014
[33]

The Paneitz equation in hyperbolic space

Hans-Christoph Grunau, Mohameden Ould Ahmedou, and Wo lfgang Reichel. The Paneitz equation in hyperbolic space. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire , 25(5):847–864, 2008

2008
[34]

Fractional p-Laplacian equations on Riemannian manifolds

Lifeng Guo, Binlin Zhang, and Yadong Zhang. Fractional p-Laplacian equations on Riemannian manifolds. Electron. J. Diﬀerential Equations , pages Paper No. 156, 17, 2018

2018
[35]

Sreenadh

Diksha Gupta and K. Sreenadh. Existence, symmetry and r egularity of ground states of a non linear choquard equation in the hyperbolic space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10236, 2024

2024 arXiv
[36]

Harnack in equality for fractional laplacian- type operators on hyperbolic spaces

Jongmyeong Kim, Minhyun Kim, and Ki-Ahm Lee. Harnack in equality for fractional laplacian- type operators on hyperbolic spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08746, 2021. MIXED LOCAL-NONLOCAL OPERATOR IN THE HYPERBOLIC SPACE 29

2021
[37]

The fracti onal p-laplacian on hyperbolic spaces

Jongmyeong Kim, Minhyun Kim, and Ki-Ahm Lee. The fracti onal p-laplacian on hyperbolic spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07029, 2022

2022
[38]

P.-L. Lions. The concentration-compactness principl e in the calculus of variations. the limit case, part 1. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 1(1):145–201, 1985

1985
[39]

Generalized Helgason-Fo urier transforms associated to vari- ants of the Laplace-Beltrami operators on the unit ball in Rn

Congwen Liu and Lizhong Peng. Generalized Helgason-Fo urier transforms associated to vari- ants of the Laplace-Beltrami operators on the unit ball in Rn. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 58(3):1457–1491, 2009

2009
[40]

Paneitz operators on hyper bolic spaces and high order Hardy- Sobolev-Maz’ya inequalities on half spaces

Guozhen Lu and Qiaohua Yang. Paneitz operators on hyper bolic spaces and high order Hardy- Sobolev-Maz’ya inequalities on half spaces. Amer. J. Math. , 141(6):1777–1816, 2019

2019
[41]

Green’s functions of Panei tz and GJMS operators on hyper- bolic spaces and sharp Hardy-Sobolev-Maz’ya inequalities on half spaces

Guozhen Lu and Qiaohua Yang. Green’s functions of Panei tz and GJMS operators on hyper- bolic spaces and sharp Hardy-Sobolev-Maz’ya inequalities on half spaces. Adv. Math., 398:Pa- per No. 108156, 42, 2022

2022
[42]

Va riational methods for nonpositive mixed local-nonlocal operators

Alberto Maione, Dimitri Mugnai, and Eugenio Vecchi. Va riational methods for nonpositive mixed local-nonlocal operators. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. , 26(3):943–961, 2023

2023
[43]

On a semilinear ell iptic equation in Hn

Gianni Mancini and Kunnath Sandeep. On a semilinear ell iptic equation in Hn. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 7(4):635–671, 2008

2008
[44]

Di Nezza, G

E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, and E. Valdinoci. Hitchhiker ’s guide to the fractional sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. , 136(5):521–573, 2012

2012
[45]

Richard S. Palais. The principle of symmetric critical ity. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 69(1):19–30, 1979

1979
[46]

Ratcliﬀe

John G. Ratcliﬀe. Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds, volume 149 of Graduate Texts in Math- ematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994

1994
[47]

Ros-Oton

X. Ros-Oton. Nonlocal elliptic equations in bounded do mains: a survey. Publ. Mat., 60(1):3–26, 2016

2016
[48]

Aspects of Sobolev-type inequalities, volume 289 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series

Laurent Saloﬀ-Coste. Aspects of Sobolev-type inequalities, volume 289 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

2002
[49]

Pseudo-Poincaré inequalities a nd applications to Sobolev inequalities

Laurent Saloﬀ-Coste. Pseudo-Poincaré inequalities a nd applications to Sobolev inequalities. In Around the research of Vladimir Maz’ya. I , volume 11 of Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.) , pages 349–372. Springer, New York, 2010

2010
[50]

Servadei and E

R. Servadei and E. Valdinoci. Variational methods for n on-local operators of elliptic type. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 33(5):2105–2137, 2013

2013
[51]

The brezis-ni renberg result for the fractional laplacian

Raﬀaella Servadei and Enrico Valdinoci. The brezis-ni renberg result for the fractional laplacian. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 367(1):67–102, 2015

2015
[52]

M. Struwe. A global compactness result for elliptic bou ndary value problems involving limiting nonlinearities. Math. Z. , 187:511–517, 1984. D. Gupta, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Te chnology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, Delhi 110016, India Email address : d...

1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Symmetrization in analysis , volume 36 of New Mathematical Mono- graphs

Albert Baernstein, II. Symmetrization in analysis , volume 36 of New Mathematical Mono- graphs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019. With David D rasin and Richard S. Laugesen, With a foreword by Walter Hayman

work page 2019

[2] [4]

Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson sem igroup, and analysis on the sphere Sn

William Beckner. Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson sem igroup, and analysis on the sphere Sn. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 89(11):4816–4819, 1992

work page 1992

[3] [1]

Rabinowitz

Antonio Ambrosetti and Paul H. Rabinowitz. Dual variati onal methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Functional Analysis , 14:349–381, 1973

work page 1973

[4] [3]

Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds

Valeria Banica, María del Mar González, and Mariel Sáez. Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 31(2):681–712, 2015

work page 2015

[5] [5]

S tability and qualitative properties of radial solutions of the Lane-Emden-Fowler equation on Riem annian models

Elvise Berchio, Alberto Ferrero, and Gabriele Grillo. S tability and qualitative properties of radial solutions of the Lane-Emden-Fowler equation on Riem annian models. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 102(1):1–35, 2014

work page 2014

[6] [6]

A global com- pactness result and multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical exponent problems in the hyperbolic space

Mousomi Bhakta, Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and Alok K umar Sahoo. A global com- pactness result and multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical exponent problems in the hyperbolic space. Communications in Contemporary Mathematics , page 2450045, 2025/05/10 2024

work page 2025

[7] [7]

Poincar\'e-Sobolev equations with the critical exponent and a potential in the hyperbolic space

Mousomi Bhakta, Debdip Ganguly, Diksha Gupta, and Alok K umar Sahoo. Poincaré- sobolev equations with the critical exponent and a potentia l in the hyperbolic space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03164, 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[8] [8]

Mousomi Bhakta and K. Sandeep. Poincaré–sobolev equati ons in the hyperbolic space. Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 44(1):247–269, 2012

work page 2012