REVIEW 3 cited by
Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sideband Spectroscopy in the Strong Driving Regime: Volcano Transparency and Sideband Anomaly
A strongly driven spin can emit a volcano-shaped spectrum with a transparent center and, in a nonlinear cavity, both sidebands on the same side of the centroid, as reported for P1 and NV- diamond defects.
-
Quantifying How Much Has Been Learned from a Research Study
A study's contribution to science can be quantified as the Wasserstein-2 distance between the community's prior and posterior distributions over the effect of interest.
-
Paradise of Forking Paths: Revisiting the Adaptive Data Analysis Problem
A Pólya-tree Bayesian scheme for adaptive counting queries estimates a distribution with lower MSE than non-adaptive histograms in simulated Gaussian mixtures.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.