MagCeptor: Encoding Broadcast-Addressable Logic into Magnetic Receptors

Baijia Liang; Haoxuan Wu; Hongliang Ren; Shuo Xu; Sishen Yuan; Tangyou Liu; Yiqing Huang

arxiv: 2605.19558 · v1 · pith:H7I6HMTWnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

MagCeptor: Encoding Broadcast-Addressable Logic into Magnetic Receptors

Sishen Yuan , Baijia Liang , Tangyou Liu , Yiqing Huang , Haoxuan Wu , Shuo Xu , Hongliang Ren This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY

keywords magnetic receptorsbroadcast addressabilitysnap-through instabilitypotential landscapesdistributed networkingembodied logicuntethered systemsmagnetic topology

0 comments

The pith

MagCeptors encode selectivity into magnetic topology so global fields trigger specific snap-through responses

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that magnetic systems can solve the addressability problem by placing selectivity inside the physical structure of the receptors themselves. This would matter if true because it lets a single global field source drive many distinct actions across a distributed collection of devices without local wires or electronics. Local couplings between magnetic elements create shaped potential landscapes that make different global field vectors act like keys, each unlocking a deterministic snap-through instability at its own threshold. The design therefore separates the delivered force from how far away the field source sits, reaching 385 mN/mm³. The authors demonstrate the approach with signal demultiplexing, embodied sequential logic, and untethered networking among multiple units.

Core claim

By encoding selectivity directly into magnetic topology, MagCeptor arrays establish an energetic isomorphism with biological receptors. Local couplings shape potential landscapes such that global field vectors act as spatial keys triggering deterministic snap-through instabilities. This architecture decouples force from source distance, achieving a density of 385 mN/mm³ (more than 50-fold increase over prior art), and is validated through signal demultiplexing, embodied sequential logic, and untethered distributed networking.

What carries the argument

The MagCeptor array, which uses local couplings to shape potential landscapes so global field vectors serve as spatial keys for selective snap-through activation.

If this is right

Signal demultiplexing becomes possible using selective responses to global fields.
Embodied sequential logic can be realized directly in the physical magnetic material.
Untethered distributed networking functions without electronics or tethers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same physical-encoding principle might be transferred to other broadcast fields such as electric or acoustic actuation for similar selectivity gains.
Distributed swarms could coordinate complex tasks purely through material instabilities rather than onboard computation.
Integration with soft or deformable structures could produce more resilient logic-carrying robots.

Load-bearing premise

Local couplings can shape potential landscapes such that global field vectors act as spatial keys triggering deterministic snap-through instabilities.

What would settle it

Fabricating MagCeptor arrays and measuring whether different global field vectors produce distinct, repeatable snap-through events while force output stays constant with changing source distance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19558 by Baijia Liang, Haoxuan Wu, Hongliang Ren, Shuo Xu, Sishen Yuan, Tangyou Liu, Yiqing Huang.

read the original abstract

Multicellular coordination relies on broadcast-addressable receptors, yet engineered magnetic systems face an addressability bottleneck because global fields intrinsically conflate power and control. Here, we introduce MagCeptors to resolve this by encoding selectivity directly into magnetic topology. Establishing an energetic isomorphism with biological receptors, these arrays utilize local couplings to shape potential landscapes where global field vectors act as spatial keys, triggering deterministic snap-through instabilities. This architecture decouples force from source distance, achieving a density of 385 mN/mm3 (>50-fold increase over prior art). We validate this primitive through signal demultiplexing, embodied sequential logic, and untethered distributed networking. This framework enables distributed systems to orchestrate complex tasks without tethers or electronics, relying solely on the intrinsic logic of matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MagCeptors encode addressability into magnetic topology via local couplings and snap-through, claiming a large force-density gain, but the determinism needed for reliable logic looks vulnerable to noise and variance.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper introduces MagCeptors as a way to build broadcast-addressable behavior directly into arrays of magnetic elements. Local couplings shape potential landscapes so that particular global field vectors trigger selective snap-through instabilities, letting the system do demultiplexing, sequential logic, and simple networking without local electronics or tethers. The reported 385 mN/mm3 density, presented as more than 50 times prior work, comes from letting the instability supply the force rather than the applied field itself. That decoupling is the clearest new element relative to standard magnetic actuation papers. The biological-receptor analogy helps frame why the topology can act as a spatial key, and the three validation examples show they tried to move from mechanism to functional primitives. If the local geometry really produces distinct, repeatable thresholds, the approach could matter for untethered distributed mechanical systems. The main soft spot is the assumption that the snap-through events stay deterministic. Thermal fluctuations on the order of kT and ordinary fabrication spreads in coupling strength or magnetization direction can blur thresholds or create crosstalk, turning intended logic into probabilistic behavior. The abstract does not report barrier heights relative to noise or error rates from the logic tests, so it is difficult to judge how robust the demonstrations actually are. The density number also needs explicit baselines and measurement details to confirm it is not tied to post-hoc tuning. This work is aimed at researchers in magnetic actuation, soft robotics, and embodied computation who are looking for material-level alternatives to electronic addressing. A reader interested in new physical primitives would find the architecture worth examining, though they would want tighter data on reliability. It is distinct enough and has enough downstream relevance that it should go to peer review rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces MagCeptors, arrays of magnetic receptors that encode selectivity into magnetic topology via local couplings. These couplings shape potential landscapes so that specific global field vectors act as spatial keys triggering deterministic snap-through instabilities. The architecture decouples output force from source distance, yielding a reported force density of 385 mN/mm³ (>50-fold over prior art). The primitive is validated via signal demultiplexing, embodied sequential logic, and untethered distributed networking, enabling complex coordination in distributed systems without tethers or electronics.

Significance. If substantiated, the work provides a physically embodied mechanism for broadcast addressability in magnetic actuation, potentially enabling high-density, electronics-free distributed systems. The energetic isomorphism with biological receptors offers a useful conceptual bridge, and the reported density gain plus the three validation modalities constitute concrete strengths. The approach aligns with embodied-computation goals in systems and control.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / energetic isomorphism section] Abstract and the section establishing the energetic isomorphism: the central claim that local couplings produce distinct potential landscapes yielding deterministic snap-through under chosen global field vectors is load-bearing for both the force-distance decoupling and all three validations. The manuscript does not quantify barrier heights relative to kT or report transition error rates under thermal noise and geometric/magnetization tolerances; without these, the determinism cannot be assessed and the architecture risks probabilistic crosstalk.
[Results / density and validation subsections] Results on density and validations: the 385 mN/mm³ figure and the >50-fold claim are presented without explicit comparison baselines, parameter independence checks, or raw data/error bars. This directly affects whether the density advantage is robust or tied to specific design choices, as required for the architecture's claimed advantage.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction / Methods] Notation for field vectors and coupling parameters should be defined consistently on first use to aid readability for systems/control readers.
[Figure captions] Figure captions for the logic demonstrations should include quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate over N trials) rather than qualitative descriptions only.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive evaluation of the work's significance. We address the two major comments point-by-point below, agreeing that additional quantification and explicit comparisons will strengthen the manuscript. All requested elements can be incorporated in revision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / energetic isomorphism section] Abstract and the section establishing the energetic isomorphism: the central claim that local couplings produce distinct potential landscapes yielding deterministic snap-through under chosen global field vectors is load-bearing for both the force-distance decoupling and all three validations. The manuscript does not quantify barrier heights relative to kT or report transition error rates under thermal noise and geometric/magnetization tolerances; without these, the determinism cannot be assessed and the architecture risks probabilistic crosstalk.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of energy barriers relative to kT is needed to rigorously support determinism claims. Our current experimental results across multiple devices and trials show repeatable snap-through without crosstalk, but we acknowledge this does not substitute for thermal analysis. In the revised manuscript we will add micromagnetic simulations of the shaped potential landscapes, reporting estimated barrier heights in units of kT at room temperature, and include a discussion of how these barriers exceed typical thermal fluctuations. We will also report empirical transition success rates from the validation experiments (including error rates under controlled geometric and magnetization variations) and add a brief tolerance analysis based on fabrication data. revision: yes
Referee: [Results / density and validation subsections] Results on density and validations: the 385 mN/mm³ figure and the >50-fold claim are presented without explicit comparison baselines, parameter independence checks, or raw data/error bars. This directly affects whether the density advantage is robust or tied to specific design choices, as required for the architecture's claimed advantage.

Authors: We accept that the density result requires more transparent presentation. The 385 mN/mm³ value was obtained by dividing measured peak output force by the active magnetic volume of the array. In revision we will add an explicit comparison table listing prior magnetic actuation approaches with their reported densities, operating conditions, and source distances. We will include error bars derived from repeated measurements on multiple fabricated devices, perform and report parameter sweeps demonstrating robustness to small geometric and magnetization variations, and deposit raw force-displacement data in the supplementary materials. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present the MagCeptor architecture as introducing local couplings to shape potential landscapes for deterministic snap-through under global fields, with the reported density of 385 mN/mm3 stated as an achieved outcome validated through demultiplexing, sequential logic, and networking demonstrations. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are visible in the given text that would reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The energetic isomorphism is invoked as an establishing step rather than a derived result, and the performance metric is framed as an experimental outcome rather than a statistical fit to the same data. This qualifies as a normal, self-contained finding with independent content from the physical validations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claim rests on an unelaborated energetic isomorphism and the ability of local couplings to produce addressable instabilities.

free parameters (1)

Achieved force density
The specific value 385 mN/mm3 is reported as a performance outcome but its derivation or measurement details are not provided.

axioms (1)

domain assumption An energetic isomorphism with biological receptors can be established in magnetic arrays.
Invoked at the outset to motivate encoding selectivity into magnetic topology.

invented entities (1)

MagCeptor no independent evidence
purpose: Magnetic receptor array that encodes addressability via topology
New device concept introduced to overcome the global-field addressability bottleneck.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1333 out tokens · 51015 ms · 2026-05-20T03:54:25.903970+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

local couplings to shape potential landscapes where global field vectors act as spatial keys, triggering deterministic snap-through instabilities
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

relying solely on the intrinsic logic of matter

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

[1]

Patke, M

A. Patke, M. W. Young, S. Axelrod, Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21, 67-84 (2020)

work page 2020
[2]

Priest, P

C. Priest, P. Tontonoz, Inter -organ cross -talk in metabolic syndrome. Nature Metabolism 1, 1177 -1188 (2019)

work page 2019
[3]

J. Yang, X. Li, Q. He, X. Wang, J. Tang, T. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Yu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, Structural basis for the activity of the type VII CRISPR–Cas system. Nature 633, 465-472 (2024)

work page 2024
[4]

M. S. Taylor, M. Chen, M. Hancock, M. Wranik, B. D. Miller, T. R. O’Meara, B. A. Palanski, S. B. Ficarro, B. J. Groendyke, Y. Xiang, Structural basis for the recruitment and selective phosphorylation of Akt by mTORC2. Science, eadv7111 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

Suomivuori, N

C.-M. Suomivuori, N. R. Latorraca, L. M. Wingler, S. Eismann, M. C. King, A. L. Kleinhenz, M. A. Skiba, D. P. Staus, A. C. Kruse, R. J. Lefkowitz, Molecular mechanism of biased signaling in a prototypical G - protein-coupled receptor. Biophysical Journal 118, 162a (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

C. B. Billesbø lle, C. A. de March, W. J. van der Velden, N. Ma, J. Tewari, C. L. Del Torrent, L. Li, B. Faust, N. Vaidehi, H. Matsunami, Structural basis of odorant recognition by a human odorant receptor. Nature 615, 742-749 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

W. Xu, L. Wu, S. Liu, X. Liu, C. Zhou, J. Zhang, Y. Fu, Y. Guo, Y. Wu, Q. Tan, Structural basis for strychnine activation of human bitter taste receptor TAS2R46. Science 377, 1298-1304 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Y. Xia, J. Li, Y.-T. Chu, J. Rao, J. Chen, C. Hua, D.-J. Yu, X.-C. Chen, S. Zheng, Deciphering RNA–ligand binding specificity with GerNA-Bind. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1-13 (2025)

work page 2025
[9]

T.-H. Chou, M. Epstein, R. G. Fritzemeier, N. S. Akins, S. Paladugu, E. Z. Ullman, D. C. Liotta, S. F. Traynelis, H. Furukawa, Molecular mechanism of ligand gating and opening of NMDA receptor. Nature 632, 209-217 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

C. Chen, P. Shi, Z. Liu, S. Duan, M. Si, C. Zhang, Y. Du, Y. Yan, T. J. White, R. Kramer -Bottiglio, Advancing physical intelligence for autonomous soft robots. Science Robotics 10, eads1292 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

V. A. Webster-Wood, O. Akkus, U. A. Gurkan, H. J. Chiel, R. D. Quinn, Organismal engineering: Toward a robotic taxonomic key for devices using organic materials. Science Robotics 2, eaap9281 (2017)

work page 2017
[12]

G.-Z. Yang, J. Bellingham, P. E. Dupont, P. Fischer, L. Floridi, R. Full, N. Jacobstein, V. Kumar, M. McNutt, R. Merrifield, The grand challenges of science robotics. Science Robotics 3, eaar7650 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

W. Hu, G. Z. Lum, M. Mastrangeli, M. Sitti, Small -scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554, 81-85 (2018)

work page 2018
[14]

Y. Kim, E. Genevriere, P. Harker, J. Choe, M. Balicki, R. W. Regenhardt, J. E. Vranic, A. A. Dmytriw, A. B. Patel, X. Zhao, Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Science Robotics 7, eabg9907 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

S. Yuan, C. Xu, B. Cui, T. Zhang, B. Liang, W. Yuan, H. Ren, Motor -free telerobotic endomicroscopy for steerable and programmable imaging in complex curved and localized areas. Nature Communications 15, 7680 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

J. Cui, T. -Y. Huang, Z. Luo, P. Testa, H. Gu, X. -Z. Chen, B. J. Nelson, L. J. Heyderman, Nanomagnetic encoding of shape-morphing micromachines. Nature 575, 164-168 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

X. Bao, F. Wang, J. Zhang, M. Li, S. Zhang, Z. Ren, J. Liao, Y. Yan, W. Kang, R. Zhang, Real -time in situ magnetization reprogramming for soft robotics. Nature 645, 375-384 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

S. Li, R. Batra, D. Brown, H.-D. Chang, N. Ranganathan, C. Hoberman, D. Rus, H. Lipson, Particle robotics based on statistical mechanics of loosely coupled components. Nature 567, 361-365 (2019)

work page 2019
[19]

da Veiga, M

T. da Veiga, M. Brockdorff, G. Pittiglio, J. H. Chandler, P. Valdastri, Magnetic localization during manipulation by two robotized permanent magnets. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 02783649251317212 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

S. L. Charreyron, Q. Boehler, B. Kim, C. Weibel, C. Chautems, B. J. Nelson, Modeling electromagnetic navigation systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 37, 1009-1021 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

W. Lee, J. Nam, B. Jang, G. Jang, Selective motion control of a crawling magnetic robot system for wireless self-expandable stent delivery in narrowed tubular environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 64, 1636-1644 (2016)

work page 2016
[22]

X. Dong, M. Sitti, Controlling two -dimensional collective formation and cooperative behavior of magnetic microrobot swarms. The International Journal of Robotics Research 39, 617-638 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

M. Wang, T. Wu, R. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Selective and independent control of microrobots in a magnetic field: a review. Engineering 24, 21-38 (2023). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 18

work page 2023
[24]

T. Xu, C. Huang, Z. Lai, X. Wu, Independent control strategy of multiple magnetic flexible millirobots for position control and path following. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 38, 2875-2887 (2022)

work page 2022
[25]

R. F. Moritz, S. Fuchs, Organization of honeybee colonies: characteristics and consequences of a superorganism concept. Apidologie 29, 7-21 (1998)

work page 1998
[26]

Swarms, Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-Making

H. Swarms, Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-Making. Eur. J. Immunol 38, 2369 (2008)

work page 2008
[27]

Q. Cao, R. Deng, Y. Pan, R. Liu, Y. Chen, G. Gong, J. Zou, H. Yang, D. Han, Robotic wireless capsule endoscopy: recent advances and upcoming technologies. Nature Communications 15, 4597 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

B. J. Nelson, I. K. Kaliakatsos, J. J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 12, 55-85 (2010)

work page 2010
[29]

S. Man, S. Kim, S. Bergbreiter, The microDelta: Downscaling robot mechanisms enables ultrafast and high- precision movement. Science Robotics 10, eadx3883 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

Salmanipour, E

S. Salmanipour, E. Diller, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). (IEEE, 2018), pp. 3608-3613

work page 2018
[31]

K. Choi, G. Jang, S. Jeon, J. Nam, Capsule-type magnetic microrobot actuated by an external magnetic field for selective drug delivery in human blood vessels. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 50, 1-4 (2014)

work page 2014
[32]

Salmanipour, O

S. Salmanipour, O. Youssefi, E. D. Diller, Design of multi -degrees-of-freedom microrobots driven by homogeneous quasi-static magnetic fields. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 37, 246-256 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

Rahmer, C

J. Rahmer, C. Stehning, B. Gleich, Spatially selective remote magnetic actuation of identical helical micromachines. Science Robotics 2, eaal2845 (2017)

work page 2017
[34]

Liu, W.-B

X.-A. Liu, W.-B. Shangguan, Z.-P. Lv, W. Ahmed, W. Zhu, A study on optimization method of a powertrain mounting system with a three-cylinder engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 231, 2235-2252 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

H. Wang, J. Cui, K. Tian, Y. Han, Three -degrees-of-freedom orientation manipulation of small untethered robots with a single anisotropic soft magnet. Nature Communications 14, 7491 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

C. Tang, B. Du, S. Jiang, Q. Shao, X. Dong, X. -J. Liu, H. Zhao, A pipeline inspection robot for navigating tubular environments in the sub-centimeter scale. Science Robotics 7, eabm8597 (2022)

work page 2022
[37]

Lai, T.-A

J. Lai, T.-A. Ren, W. Yue, S. Su, J. Y. Chan, H. Ren, Sim-to-real transfer of soft robotic navigation strategies that learns from the virtual eye-in-hand vision. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 20, 2365-2377 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

G. M. Winston, J. H. Zimering, C. W. Newman, A. S. Reiner, N. Manalil, N. Kharas, A. Gulati, N. Rakesh, I. Laufer, M. H. Bilsky, Safety and Efficacy of Surgical Implantation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps in Patients With Cancer With Refractory Pain. Neurosurgery 95, 1072-1081 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

X. Tian, Q. Zeng, S. A. Kurt, R. R. Li, D. T. Nguyen, Z. Xiong, Z. Li, X. Yang, X. Xiao, C. Wu, Implant-to- implant wireless networking with metamaterial textiles. Nature Communications 14, 4335 (2023)

work page 2023
[40]

Abyzova, E

E. Abyzova, E. Dogadina, R. D. Rodriguez, I. Petrov, Y. Kolesnikova, M. Zhou, C. Liu, E. Sheremet, Beyond Tissue replacement: The Emerging role of smart implants in healthcare. Materials Today Bio 22, 100784 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Rafsanjani, K

A. Rafsanjani, K. Bertoldi, A. R. Studart, Programming soft robots with flexible mechanical metamaterials. Science Robotics 4, eaav7874 (2019)

work page 2019
[42]

R. H. Lee, E. A. Mulder, J. B. Hopkins, Mechanical neural networks: Architected materials that learn behaviors. Science Robotics 7, eabq7278 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

D. Yang, M. Feng, J. Sun, Y. Wei, J. Zou, X. Zhu, G. Gu, Soft multifunctional bistable fabric mechanism for electronics-free autonomous robots. Science Advances 11, eads8734 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

X. Hu, T. Tan, Y. Chen, Z. Yan, Spatially programmable origami networks enable high-density mechanical computing for autonomous robotics. Nature Communications 16, 10209 (2025)

work page 2025
[45]

Z. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Chen, J. Law, H. Pu, S. Xie, F. Duan, Y. Sun, N. Liu, J. Yu, A magnetic multi -layer soft robot for on-demand targeted adhesion. Nature Communications 15, 644 (2024)

work page 2024
[46]

M. P. Kummer, J. J. Abbott, B. E. Kratochvil, R. Borer, A. Sengul, B. J. Nelson, OctoMag: An electromagnetic system for 5 -DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26, 1006- 1017 (2010)

work page 2010
[47]

S. Su, S. Yuan, M. Xu, H. Gao, X. Yang, H. Ren, AMagPoseNet: Real-time six-DoF magnet pose estimation by dual-domain few-shot learning from prior model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 19, 9722- 9732 (2023)

work page 2023
[48]

L. Su, D. Jin, N. Xia, B. Hao, Y. Jiang, Q. Wang, H. Yang, X. Wang, K. F. Chan, X. Ma, Modular magnetic microrobot system for robust endoluminal navigation and high–radial force stent delivery in complex ductal anatomy. Science Advances 11, eady4339 (2025). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 19

work page 2025
[49]

S. R. Krishnan, T. R. Ray, A. B. Ayer, Y. Ma, P. Gutruf, K. Lee, J. Y. Lee, C. Wei, X. Feng, B. Ng, Epidermal electronics for noninvasive, wireless, quantitative assessment of ventricular shunt function in patients with hydrocephalus. Science Translational Medicine 10, eaat8437 (2018). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 20 Acknowledgments: The authors gra...

work page 2018

[1] [1]

Patke, M

A. Patke, M. W. Young, S. Axelrod, Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21, 67-84 (2020)

work page 2020

[2] [2]

Priest, P

C. Priest, P. Tontonoz, Inter -organ cross -talk in metabolic syndrome. Nature Metabolism 1, 1177 -1188 (2019)

work page 2019

[3] [3]

J. Yang, X. Li, Q. He, X. Wang, J. Tang, T. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Yu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, Structural basis for the activity of the type VII CRISPR–Cas system. Nature 633, 465-472 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [4]

M. S. Taylor, M. Chen, M. Hancock, M. Wranik, B. D. Miller, T. R. O’Meara, B. A. Palanski, S. B. Ficarro, B. J. Groendyke, Y. Xiang, Structural basis for the recruitment and selective phosphorylation of Akt by mTORC2. Science, eadv7111 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Suomivuori, N

C.-M. Suomivuori, N. R. Latorraca, L. M. Wingler, S. Eismann, M. C. King, A. L. Kleinhenz, M. A. Skiba, D. P. Staus, A. C. Kruse, R. J. Lefkowitz, Molecular mechanism of biased signaling in a prototypical G - protein-coupled receptor. Biophysical Journal 118, 162a (2020)

work page 2020

[6] [6]

C. B. Billesbø lle, C. A. de March, W. J. van der Velden, N. Ma, J. Tewari, C. L. Del Torrent, L. Li, B. Faust, N. Vaidehi, H. Matsunami, Structural basis of odorant recognition by a human odorant receptor. Nature 615, 742-749 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

W. Xu, L. Wu, S. Liu, X. Liu, C. Zhou, J. Zhang, Y. Fu, Y. Guo, Y. Wu, Q. Tan, Structural basis for strychnine activation of human bitter taste receptor TAS2R46. Science 377, 1298-1304 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Y. Xia, J. Li, Y.-T. Chu, J. Rao, J. Chen, C. Hua, D.-J. Yu, X.-C. Chen, S. Zheng, Deciphering RNA–ligand binding specificity with GerNA-Bind. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1-13 (2025)

work page 2025

[9] [9]

T.-H. Chou, M. Epstein, R. G. Fritzemeier, N. S. Akins, S. Paladugu, E. Z. Ullman, D. C. Liotta, S. F. Traynelis, H. Furukawa, Molecular mechanism of ligand gating and opening of NMDA receptor. Nature 632, 209-217 (2024)

work page 2024

[10] [10]

C. Chen, P. Shi, Z. Liu, S. Duan, M. Si, C. Zhang, Y. Du, Y. Yan, T. J. White, R. Kramer -Bottiglio, Advancing physical intelligence for autonomous soft robots. Science Robotics 10, eads1292 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

V. A. Webster-Wood, O. Akkus, U. A. Gurkan, H. J. Chiel, R. D. Quinn, Organismal engineering: Toward a robotic taxonomic key for devices using organic materials. Science Robotics 2, eaap9281 (2017)

work page 2017

[12] [12]

G.-Z. Yang, J. Bellingham, P. E. Dupont, P. Fischer, L. Floridi, R. Full, N. Jacobstein, V. Kumar, M. McNutt, R. Merrifield, The grand challenges of science robotics. Science Robotics 3, eaar7650 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

W. Hu, G. Z. Lum, M. Mastrangeli, M. Sitti, Small -scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554, 81-85 (2018)

work page 2018

[14] [14]

Y. Kim, E. Genevriere, P. Harker, J. Choe, M. Balicki, R. W. Regenhardt, J. E. Vranic, A. A. Dmytriw, A. B. Patel, X. Zhao, Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Science Robotics 7, eabg9907 (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

S. Yuan, C. Xu, B. Cui, T. Zhang, B. Liang, W. Yuan, H. Ren, Motor -free telerobotic endomicroscopy for steerable and programmable imaging in complex curved and localized areas. Nature Communications 15, 7680 (2024)

work page 2024

[16] [16]

J. Cui, T. -Y. Huang, Z. Luo, P. Testa, H. Gu, X. -Z. Chen, B. J. Nelson, L. J. Heyderman, Nanomagnetic encoding of shape-morphing micromachines. Nature 575, 164-168 (2019)

work page 2019

[17] [17]

X. Bao, F. Wang, J. Zhang, M. Li, S. Zhang, Z. Ren, J. Liao, Y. Yan, W. Kang, R. Zhang, Real -time in situ magnetization reprogramming for soft robotics. Nature 645, 375-384 (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

S. Li, R. Batra, D. Brown, H.-D. Chang, N. Ranganathan, C. Hoberman, D. Rus, H. Lipson, Particle robotics based on statistical mechanics of loosely coupled components. Nature 567, 361-365 (2019)

work page 2019

[19] [19]

da Veiga, M

T. da Veiga, M. Brockdorff, G. Pittiglio, J. H. Chandler, P. Valdastri, Magnetic localization during manipulation by two robotized permanent magnets. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 02783649251317212 (2025)

work page 2025

[20] [20]

S. L. Charreyron, Q. Boehler, B. Kim, C. Weibel, C. Chautems, B. J. Nelson, Modeling electromagnetic navigation systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 37, 1009-1021 (2021)

work page 2021

[21] [21]

W. Lee, J. Nam, B. Jang, G. Jang, Selective motion control of a crawling magnetic robot system for wireless self-expandable stent delivery in narrowed tubular environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 64, 1636-1644 (2016)

work page 2016

[22] [22]

X. Dong, M. Sitti, Controlling two -dimensional collective formation and cooperative behavior of magnetic microrobot swarms. The International Journal of Robotics Research 39, 617-638 (2020)

work page 2020

[23] [23]

M. Wang, T. Wu, R. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Selective and independent control of microrobots in a magnetic field: a review. Engineering 24, 21-38 (2023). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 18

work page 2023

[24] [24]

T. Xu, C. Huang, Z. Lai, X. Wu, Independent control strategy of multiple magnetic flexible millirobots for position control and path following. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 38, 2875-2887 (2022)

work page 2022

[25] [25]

R. F. Moritz, S. Fuchs, Organization of honeybee colonies: characteristics and consequences of a superorganism concept. Apidologie 29, 7-21 (1998)

work page 1998

[26] [26]

Swarms, Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-Making

H. Swarms, Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-Making. Eur. J. Immunol 38, 2369 (2008)

work page 2008

[27] [27]

Q. Cao, R. Deng, Y. Pan, R. Liu, Y. Chen, G. Gong, J. Zou, H. Yang, D. Han, Robotic wireless capsule endoscopy: recent advances and upcoming technologies. Nature Communications 15, 4597 (2024)

work page 2024

[28] [28]

B. J. Nelson, I. K. Kaliakatsos, J. J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 12, 55-85 (2010)

work page 2010

[29] [29]

S. Man, S. Kim, S. Bergbreiter, The microDelta: Downscaling robot mechanisms enables ultrafast and high- precision movement. Science Robotics 10, eadx3883 (2025)

work page 2025

[30] [30]

Salmanipour, E

S. Salmanipour, E. Diller, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). (IEEE, 2018), pp. 3608-3613

work page 2018

[31] [31]

K. Choi, G. Jang, S. Jeon, J. Nam, Capsule-type magnetic microrobot actuated by an external magnetic field for selective drug delivery in human blood vessels. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 50, 1-4 (2014)

work page 2014

[32] [32]

Salmanipour, O

S. Salmanipour, O. Youssefi, E. D. Diller, Design of multi -degrees-of-freedom microrobots driven by homogeneous quasi-static magnetic fields. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 37, 246-256 (2020)

work page 2020

[33] [33]

Rahmer, C

J. Rahmer, C. Stehning, B. Gleich, Spatially selective remote magnetic actuation of identical helical micromachines. Science Robotics 2, eaal2845 (2017)

work page 2017

[34] [34]

Liu, W.-B

X.-A. Liu, W.-B. Shangguan, Z.-P. Lv, W. Ahmed, W. Zhu, A study on optimization method of a powertrain mounting system with a three-cylinder engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 231, 2235-2252 (2017)

work page 2017

[35] [35]

H. Wang, J. Cui, K. Tian, Y. Han, Three -degrees-of-freedom orientation manipulation of small untethered robots with a single anisotropic soft magnet. Nature Communications 14, 7491 (2023)

work page 2023

[36] [36]

C. Tang, B. Du, S. Jiang, Q. Shao, X. Dong, X. -J. Liu, H. Zhao, A pipeline inspection robot for navigating tubular environments in the sub-centimeter scale. Science Robotics 7, eabm8597 (2022)

work page 2022

[37] [37]

Lai, T.-A

J. Lai, T.-A. Ren, W. Yue, S. Su, J. Y. Chan, H. Ren, Sim-to-real transfer of soft robotic navigation strategies that learns from the virtual eye-in-hand vision. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 20, 2365-2377 (2023)

work page 2023

[38] [38]

G. M. Winston, J. H. Zimering, C. W. Newman, A. S. Reiner, N. Manalil, N. Kharas, A. Gulati, N. Rakesh, I. Laufer, M. H. Bilsky, Safety and Efficacy of Surgical Implantation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps in Patients With Cancer With Refractory Pain. Neurosurgery 95, 1072-1081 (2024)

work page 2024

[39] [39]

X. Tian, Q. Zeng, S. A. Kurt, R. R. Li, D. T. Nguyen, Z. Xiong, Z. Li, X. Yang, X. Xiao, C. Wu, Implant-to- implant wireless networking with metamaterial textiles. Nature Communications 14, 4335 (2023)

work page 2023

[40] [40]

Abyzova, E

E. Abyzova, E. Dogadina, R. D. Rodriguez, I. Petrov, Y. Kolesnikova, M. Zhou, C. Liu, E. Sheremet, Beyond Tissue replacement: The Emerging role of smart implants in healthcare. Materials Today Bio 22, 100784 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [41]

Rafsanjani, K

A. Rafsanjani, K. Bertoldi, A. R. Studart, Programming soft robots with flexible mechanical metamaterials. Science Robotics 4, eaav7874 (2019)

work page 2019

[42] [42]

R. H. Lee, E. A. Mulder, J. B. Hopkins, Mechanical neural networks: Architected materials that learn behaviors. Science Robotics 7, eabq7278 (2022)

work page 2022

[43] [43]

D. Yang, M. Feng, J. Sun, Y. Wei, J. Zou, X. Zhu, G. Gu, Soft multifunctional bistable fabric mechanism for electronics-free autonomous robots. Science Advances 11, eads8734 (2025)

work page 2025

[44] [44]

X. Hu, T. Tan, Y. Chen, Z. Yan, Spatially programmable origami networks enable high-density mechanical computing for autonomous robotics. Nature Communications 16, 10209 (2025)

work page 2025

[45] [45]

Z. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Chen, J. Law, H. Pu, S. Xie, F. Duan, Y. Sun, N. Liu, J. Yu, A magnetic multi -layer soft robot for on-demand targeted adhesion. Nature Communications 15, 644 (2024)

work page 2024

[46] [46]

M. P. Kummer, J. J. Abbott, B. E. Kratochvil, R. Borer, A. Sengul, B. J. Nelson, OctoMag: An electromagnetic system for 5 -DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26, 1006- 1017 (2010)

work page 2010

[47] [47]

S. Su, S. Yuan, M. Xu, H. Gao, X. Yang, H. Ren, AMagPoseNet: Real-time six-DoF magnet pose estimation by dual-domain few-shot learning from prior model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 19, 9722- 9732 (2023)

work page 2023

[48] [48]

L. Su, D. Jin, N. Xia, B. Hao, Y. Jiang, Q. Wang, H. Yang, X. Wang, K. F. Chan, X. Ma, Modular magnetic microrobot system for robust endoluminal navigation and high–radial force stent delivery in complex ductal anatomy. Science Advances 11, eady4339 (2025). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 19

work page 2025

[49] [49]

S. R. Krishnan, T. R. Ray, A. B. Ayer, Y. Ma, P. Gutruf, K. Lee, J. Y. Lee, C. Wei, X. Feng, B. Ng, Epidermal electronics for noninvasive, wireless, quantitative assessment of ventricular shunt function in patients with hydrocephalus. Science Translational Medicine 10, eaat8437 (2018). Submitted Manuscript: Confidential 20 Acknowledgments: The authors gra...

work page 2018