Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 26 of 26 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.12785.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2606.12785 v1

Coverage vector

measured 26 of 26 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

measured 26 of 26 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

26 of 26 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved25
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier1
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 15e22df5-95dd-44e4-9930-2e75fd9a29bc · outbound

This paper cites SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics4(1), 1–16 (1991).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics4(1), 1–16 (1991)

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 01a851c7-d027-4cbb-a7b8-2653acc00ee9 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Political Economy 56(1), 23–34 (1948).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Journal of Political Economy 56(1), 23–34 (1948)

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cd462f36-cfe1-4b1c-b4ea-32dd6a062215 · outbound

This paper cites (No Title) (1977).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences (No Title) (1977)

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 88d4daba-855f-4e94-b059-730a76036c0d · outbound

This paper cites (eds.): Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences (eds.): Handbook of Computational Social Choice

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5578d501-1c20-4bf1-9542-39863c7873ed · outbound

This paper cites In: Diss, M., Merlin, V.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences In: Diss, M., Merlin, V

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3ea73593-8d8e-4a0c-b2fa-2f08304f888f · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Theo- retical Politics34(4), 527–551 (2022).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Journal of Theo- retical Politics34(4), 527–551 (2022)

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 01868f3a-df3f-483b-a8e4-685f923c8a65 · outbound

This paper cites Social Choice and Welfare41(4), 989–998 (2013).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Social Choice and Welfare41(4), 989–998 (2013)

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 581bef29-02e1-4451-a7c7-41415d0cfcd7 · outbound

This paper cites Springer (2014).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Springer (2014)

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fd7bef46-78bc-4723-9c20-1f4a719c4539 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research35, 161–191 (2009).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research35, 161–191 (2009)

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7cebea34-49f3-4044-878f-05a572cd463f · outbound

This paper cites Theory and decision77(2), 275–285 (2014).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Theory and decision77(2), 275–285 (2014)

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c6ec51cc-b5f3-4228-817d-636b8139ca8a · outbound

This paper cites Trends in computa- tional social choice pp.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Trends in computa- tional social choice pp

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e8c78447-ad19-4cb9-8d77-38f5a14deca2 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Unresolved cited work

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 640f1a2a-ce25-4dec-a32c-9fda580f2cc4 · outbound

This paper cites Mathematics Mag- azine56(4), 207–214 (1983).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Mathematics Mag- azine56(4), 207–214 (1983)

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c056ba84-a70f-4f7a-b77f-7938c83c2fbe · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation edb17ed0-64da-42ad-aadb-46b2ca02788b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Unresolved cited work

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fb95d179-a0c2-45d0-af77-a415150297c4 · outbound

This paper cites Eco- nomic Theory17, 53–80 (2001).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Eco- nomic Theory17, 53–80 (2001)

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b1b25c0c-d91a-4e11-bb8c-3a7adad28e98 · outbound

This paper cites In: Proceedings of IJCAI-24.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences In: Proceedings of IJCAI-24

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 88aad754-262b-4982-b3f7-b43b37518ee3 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Eco- nomic Theory45(1), 53–64 (1988).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Journal of Eco- nomic Theory45(1), 53–64 (1988)

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e736c1f8-dbb7-48f3-8683-595e204f5d6f · outbound

This paper cites Social Choice and Welfare18(3), 601–616 (2001).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Social Choice and Welfare18(3), 601–616 (2001)

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d50ff060-4f98-4032-b6f8-536d31b3e37e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9372dd6c-6c26-4e67-85fd-670b72f201e7 · outbound

This paper cites Mathematical Social Sciences11(2), 183–189 (1986).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Mathematical Social Sciences11(2), 183–189 (1986)

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f3a6c6af-1b8f-4a83-9f25-859343b0c031 · outbound

This paper cites MIT Press (1994).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences MIT Press (1994)

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fbcdbdf6-6b91-4180-93ad-6c04126ace89 · outbound

This paper cites Public Choice72(2), 193–212 (1991).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Public Choice72(2), 193–212 (1991)

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 81e98da7-b9c2-4452-a040-70cb5e3f3470 · outbound

This paper cites European Journal of Combinatorics5(4), 359–372 (1984).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences European Journal of Combinatorics5(4), 359–372 (1984)

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation eebe83f5-4d0b-487e-8414-faa0e7ebaebb · outbound

This paper cites In: Proceedings of AAMAS (2020).

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences In: Proceedings of AAMAS (2020)

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T05:40:01.229227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a5d353ee-5e77-4a1d-a8d9-9bb87215b528 · outbound

This paper cites Generating Single Peaked Votes.

The No-show Paradox in Single Transferable Vote under One-dimensional Preferences Generating Single Peaked Votes

Reference 26

Resolution: malformed identifier; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-03T16:28:39.048851Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.