Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Cost vs. Information Tradeoffs for Treasure Hunt in the Plane

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.06090 v1 pith:HBW7ZV24 submitted 2019-02-16 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords treasureagentcostadvicehuntalgorithmsinformationlength
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A mobile agent has to find an inert treasure hidden in the plane. Both the agent and the treasure are modeled as points. This is a variant of the task known as treasure hunt. The treasure is at a distance at most $D$ from the initial position of the agent, and the agent finds the treasure when it gets at distance $r$ from it, called the {\em vision radius}. However, the agent does not know the location of the treasure and does not know the parameters $D$ and $r$. The cost of finding the treasure is the length of the trajectory of the agent. We investigate the tradeoffs between the amount of information held {\em a priori} by the agent and the cost of treasure hunt. Following the well-established paradigm of {\em algorithms with advice}, this information is given to the agent in advance as a binary string, by an oracle cooperating with the agent and knowing the location of the treasure and the initial position of the agent. The size of advice given to the agent is the length of this binary string. For any size $z$ of advice and any $D$ and $r$, let $OPT(z,D,r)$ be the optimal cost of finding the treasure for parameters $z$, $D$ and $r$, if the agent has only an advice string of length $z$ as input. We design treasure hunt algorithms working with advice of size $z$ at cost $O(OPT(z,D,r))$ whenever $r\leq 1$ or $r\geq 0.9D$. For intermediate values of $r$, i.e., $1<r<0.9D$, we design an almost optimal scheme of algorithms: for any constant $\alpha>0$, the treasure can be found at cost $O(OPT(z,D,r)^{1+\alpha})$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Disk and Partial Disk Inspection: Worst- to Average-Case and Pareto Upper Bounds

    cs.DM 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New upper bounds and Pareto curves for average-case disk-perimeter inspection, plus a complete worst-case solution for inspecting any arc, improving on Isbell (1957) and correcting Gluss (1961).

  2. Geometric Structure of Ends of Ricci Shrinkers

    math.DG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Blow-up limits of Ricci shrinkers based at Type I scalar curvature points split a line, with smooth convergence in dimension four.

  3. Treasure Hunt in Anonymous Graphs with Quantum Pebbles by Oblivious Agents

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A quantum pebble that emits repeated copies of a port-encoding qubit lets an oblivious agent walk to a treasure in D steps using D pebbles.

Pith tools