Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 204 references

BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey -- XIII. The nature of the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The most luminous obscured AGN in the nearby Universe stay obscured because their Eddington ratios are too low for radiation pressure to expel the dusty gas, not because they are faint, and this supports radiation-pressure-driven…

desk verdict Solid multi-wavelength characterization of 28 luminous obscured AGN; the radiation-pressure conclusion is reasonable but not robust to the stated 0.5 dex MBH systematics. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07546 v1 pith:HF75EU4A submitted 2019-08-20 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Rudolf E. Bär , Benny Trakhtenbrot , Kyuseok Oh , Michael J. Koss , O. Ivy Wong , Claudio Ricci , Kevin Schawinski , Anna K. Weigel
show 13 more authors
Lia F. Sartori Kohei Ichikawa Nathan J. Secrest Daniel Stern Fabio Pacucci Richard Mushotzky Meredith C. Powell Federica Ricci Eleonora Sani Krista L. Smith Fiona A. Harrison Isabella Lamperti C. Megan Urry
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords obscuredAGNEddingtonratioradiativefeedbackunificationrecedingtorusSwift/BATblackholemassesradio-loudBASS
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper selects the 28 most luminous obscured (type-2) active galactic nuclei in the low-redshift Universe from the Swift/BAT all-sky survey and asks whether they are a special class. It finds that apart from being hosted almost exclusively by massive elliptical galaxies and showing an unusually high rate of radio jets and double lobes, they have no distinctive properties: their black hole masses and Eddington ratios span the ordinary range. The decisive test is where they sit in the Eddington-ratio versus gas-column plane, where nearly all lie outside the "blow-out" wedge that radiation pressure would clear. The paper concludes that these objects can be as luminous as they are while remaining obscured because their Eddington ratios are modest, supporting radiative-feedback unification over the receding-torus picture. That matters because it ties the visibility of the most luminous accreting black holes to a physical radiation-pressure threshold rather than to luminosity alone.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lambda_Edd-N_H plane, a diagram plotting Eddington ratio against line-of-sight column density with a "blow-out" wedge marking where radiation pressure expels dusty circumnuclear gas. The argument is carried by placing each source in this plane, using black hole masses derived from stellar velocity dispersions through the M_BH-sigma* relation and column densities from X-ray spectral fits. The wedge boundary encodes the radiative-feedback threshold: obscuration can persist only where the Eddington ratio lies below the value that would launch a dusty outflow at that column density.

What would settle it

Measure independent black hole masses for a subset of the 28 sources using reverberation mapping or spatially resolved gas dynamics, then recompute their Eddington ratios. If the revised masses move a large fraction of the sample across the wedge boundary into the high-lambda_Edd blow-out region, the conclusion that radiation pressure keeps these AGN obscured would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the most luminous narrow-line AGN in the low-redshift Universe, selected by ultra-hard X-ray luminosity with log L_bol > 45.25, are powered by black holes of roughly $10^{7}$.5 to $10^{10}$.3 solar masses accreting at about 0.01 to 1 times the Eddington rate. In the lambda_Edd-N_H plane introduced by Ricci et al. (2017c), 26 of the 28 sources sit outside the "blow-out" wedge, meaning their Eddington ratios are too low for radiation pressure on dusty gas to push the obscuring material away; the two sources inside the wedge are consistent with the picture given the roughly 0.3-0.5 dex systematic uncertainties. The paper therefore claims that the very existence of these highly luminous obscured AGN is predicted by radiation-pressure-driven unification (Fabian et al. 2008; Ricci et al. 2017c) and challenges the receding-torus scenario (Lawrence 1991), which would make such a population rare.

Load-bearing premise

Every source's Eddington ratio is built on the assumption that these AGN fall on the same M_BH-sigma* relation as inactive galaxies; if the relation overestimates their black hole masses, the true Eddington ratios would be higher and could move a substantial part of the sample into the blow-out wedge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, obscuration of the most luminous local AGN is governed by Eddington ratio rather than bolometric luminosity alone, so a population of luminous, heavily obscured AGN can persist.
  • The receding-torus model's predicted sharp decline in the obscured fraction with increasing luminosity is weakened for these sources.
  • The positions of these sources in the lambda_Edd-N_H plane imply that their obscuration can be long-lived, not merely a transient blow-out phase.
  • The absence of distinctive black hole masses or Eddington ratios means ultra-hard X-ray selection is not biased toward extreme accretion states at the highest luminosities.
  • The high radio-loud fraction and double-lobe incidence become supplementary clues about jet launching, not defining properties of the most luminous obscured AGN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wedge test could be applied to higher-redshift type-2 quasar samples whose reported Eddington ratios are higher; if those samples genuinely lie inside the blow-out wedge, they would represent a later evolutionary stage where obscuration is being cleared.
  • If Eddington ratio controls obscuration, major mergers that boost accretion should temporarily deplete the obscured population; a time-dependent test could compare merging and isolated obscured AGN matched in luminosity and column density.
  • Independent black hole masses from reverberation mapping or gas dynamical modelling for a subset of these 28 sources would turn the ~0.5 dex systematic uncertainty into a direct calibration of where the wedge boundary actually lies.
  • The excess of radio-loud sources hints that high black hole spin may accompany these luminous phases; combining the wedge test with spin estimates from reflection spectroscopy could link obscuration geometry to spin.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multiwavelength study of 28 of the most luminous narrow-line (type-2) AGN in the local Universe, selected from the Swift/BAT 70-month survey with bolometric luminosities log(L_bol/erg/s) > 45.25. The authors combine BASS/DR1 data with new VLT/XSHOOTER, Palomar/DBSP, and Keck/LRIS spectroscopy to obtain stellar velocity dispersions, black hole masses, and Eddington ratios. They find that the sources are robustly classified as AGN by optical emission-line ratios and mid-infrared colours, are hosted predominantly in massive elliptical galaxies, show a very broad range of radio luminosities and a high incidence of radio-loud sources and double radio lobes, and span a wide range of MBH and lambda_Edd without clustering at extreme values. The central interpretive claim is that the positions of these sources in the lambda_Edd-NH plane lie mostly outside the 'blow-out' wedge of Ricci et al. (2017c), supporting a radiation-pressure-driven unification scenario in which luminous AGN can remain obscured if their Eddington ratios are not high enough to expel the dusty gas, and challenging the receding-torus picture.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper extends the Ricci et al. (2017c) radiative-feedback unification scenario to the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe, using a well-defined, ultra-hard-X-ray-selected sample with dedicated spectroscopy. The study is valuable for its transparent sample construction, public/tabulated data, explicit tests of alternative bolometric corrections, and statistical controls in the host-galaxy morphology analysis. The main caveat is that the interpretation in the lambda_Edd-NH plane depends on black hole masses estimated from the MBH-sigma* relation, whose stated systematic uncertainty (about 0.5 dex) is not propagated into the central diagnostic; this makes the headline consistency claim less robust than the text suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Section 4, Fig. 10] The central conclusion that the sample lies outside the Ricci et al. (2017c) blow-out wedge depends on lambda_Edd, which inherits MBH from the Kormendy & Ho (2013) MBH-sigma* relation. Section 2.3 states that the overall MBH uncertainties may be of order 0.5 dex, yet the robustness discussion in Section 4 varies only the bolometric correction and dismisses the two in-wedge sources using an approximately 0.3 dex systematic floor. Because the wedge boundary is a theoretical curve and is not recalibrated to the same MBH scale, a systematic offset in MBH-sigma* for these massive, mostly elliptical hosts could shift the sample horizontally in Fig. 10 by an amount comparable to or larger than the margin by which the sources sit outside the wedge. I request a quantitative robustness test: for example, shift all lambda_Edd values by +/-0.5 dex (or use an alternative MBH-sigma* calibration) and report how many sources cross into the blow-out region. Without such a test, the claim that the sample is 'consistent' with radiative-feedback unification is not yet supported at the stated confidence.
  2. [Section 4 and Section 5] The test presented in Fig. 10 is only a necessary-condition test, because the sample was selected to contain obscured AGN. All 28 sources are, by construction, narrow-line and X-ray obscured; finding them outside the blow-out wedge shows that their existence is not inconsistent with the radiative-feedback scenario, but it does not by itself demonstrate that the wedge separates obscured from unobscured populations. To strengthen the 'in contrast to the receding torus' claim, the authors should compare the distribution of these sources in the lambda_Edd-NH plane with that of a matched sample of unobscured BAT AGN at similar Lbol, or provide a quantitative prediction from the receding-torus model for the expected number of such luminous obscured sources. As written, the final summary bullet overstates the discriminating power of the current analysis.
  3. [Section 1 and Section 4] The paper states that the very existence of luminous obscured AGN challenges the receding-torus model, but it does not quantify what the receding-torus model actually predicts for the number of such objects at Lbol > 10^45.25 erg/s in the BAT survey. The receding-torus model predicts a decreasing obscured fraction with luminosity, not necessarily zero obscured objects, and the sample selection is based on the brightest obscured sources, so the observed sample size must be compared with an explicit expectation. Without such a quantitative comparison, the conclusion that these 28 objects are inconsistent with the receding-torus scenario is not supported. I recommend either adding a calculation of the expected number under both models given the BAT survey selection function, or softening the claim to state that the sample is consistent with the radiative-feedback scenario without asserting a strong exclusion of the receding-torus model.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'cicumnuclear' and 'cicrum-nuclear' in the Introduction, 'intermoftheir' in Section 1, 'K-badluminosities' in Section 3.2, and 'our our sources' in the caption of Fig. 4. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Fig. 10 caption and Section 4] The error bar shown in Fig. 10 is described as representing 'mean measurement-related errors', but the text later quotes a >=0.3 dex systematic floor. Please clarify which components are included in the displayed error bar (sigma* measurement, luminosity, distance) and which are excluded, so the reader can assess the visual claim that the two in-wedge sources are compatible with the wedge boundary.
  3. [Section 2.1, Table 2] BAT ID 1204 (the Phoenix cluster AGN) is a clear outlier in luminosity and redshift; the paper keeps it in the sample, which is defensible, but the main conclusions are driven by the remaining 27 sources. I suggest explicitly stating whether the Section 4 conclusions change if this source is removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the λ_Edd–N_H positions are measured quantities and the consistency claim is not imposed by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central interpretive step is the placement of 28 luminous obscured AGN in the log λ_Edd–log N_H plane (Section 4, Fig. 10) and the statement that they lie outside the Ricci et al. (2017c) 'blow-out' wedge. λ_Edd is constructed from measured stellar velocity dispersions through the external Kormendy & Ho (2013) M_BH–σ* relation and from BAT hard X-ray luminosities with a fixed bolometric correction; N_H is measured from X-ray spectroscopy. No parameter in the present paper is fitted to the wedge boundary or to the target conclusion. The wedge and the 392-object parent diagram are imported from Ricci et al. (2017c), and the paper deliberately adopts the same L_bol prescription 'to be consistent with the analysis performed by Ricci et al. (2017c)' — an alignment of conventions, not a fitting of the conclusion. The overlapping author list and BASS data lineage are limitations on independence, but the Ricci et al. wedge is an externally published, falsifiable result, and 18 of the 28 sources have new velocity-dispersion measurements from the dedicated XSHOOTER/Palomar/Keck campaign. The paper itself flags the two main robustness limitations: the M_BH–σ* assumption and its ~0.5 dex systematic uncertainty (Section 2.3), and the inconclusive placement of the two in-wedge sources (Fig. 10 caption). These are correctness/systematics concerns, not circular reductions: there is no equation in which a predicted quantity equals a fitted input, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the choice. I therefore find no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four inputs the reader does not pay for upstream: the bolometric correction and radio spectral index are adopted constants; the MBH-sigma* calibration is taken from inactive galaxies; and the radiation-pressure wedge is imported from a same-team prior paper. None is invented here, but the lambda_Edd-NH conclusion inherits all of them.

free parameters (4)
  • Bolometric correction fbol = 8
    Adopted from Koss et al. (2017) to convert L14-195 keV to Lbol; sets the overall scale of Lbol and lambda_Edd for all 28 sources. The authors verify alternatives (Marconi et al. 2004) change medians by less than 0.3 dex.
  • Radio spectral index alpha_nu = -0.7
    Assumed power-law slope to derive L1.4 GHz and 6 GHz luminosities from NVSS and for k-corrections; Section 3.3 acknowledges each source has a different true slope.
  • Control-sample matching bins (Delta MK, Delta z) = +/-0.5 mag, +/-0.0005
    Used to build per-source galaxy morphology comparison samples in Section 3.2; three cases had the bins widened to reach 50 objects, which influences the expected elliptical fraction.
  • Kellermann radio-loudness threshold L6GHz = 1e23.2 W/Hz
    Adopted from Kellermann et al. (2016) to classify sources as radio loud; affects the 57% versus 9% comparison.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption AGN in the sample lie on the same MBH-sigma* relation as inactive galaxies (Kormendy & Ho 2013).
    Section 2.3 states this implicitly, giving about 0.5 dex systematic uncertainty in MBH; central to every lambda_Edd placement in Fig. 10.
  • domain assumption The radiation-pressure blow-out wedge boundary in Fig. 10 from Ricci et al. (2017c) correctly maps where dusty gas cannot survive.
    Section 4 uses this wedge to conclude consistency with radiative feedback unification; the boundary is theoretical and from a heavily overlapping author team.
  • domain assumption Constant bolometric correction fbol=8 applied to observed 14-195 keV luminosity approximates true bolometric output for all 28 sources.
    Section 2.1; authors test alternative corrections and find median shifts less than 0.3 dex, so the placement of the sample in Fig. 10 is robust.
  • domain assumption Radio emission traced by NVSS measures the AGN's jet or core rather than star formation for these sources.
    Section 3.3 uses radio loudness and the fundamental plane; the large scatter might partly reflect host star formation, which they do not subtract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey -- XIII. The nature of the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HF75EU4A

@misc{pith2026190807546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey -- XIII. The nature of the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HF75EU4A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07546}
}
read the original abstract

We present a multi wavelength analysis of 28 of the most luminous low-redshift narrow-line, ultra-hard X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) drawn from the 70 month Swift/BAT all-sky survey, with bolometric luminosities of log(L_bol/erg/s) > 45.25. The broad goal of our study is to determine whether these objects have any distinctive properties, potentially setting them aside from lower-luminosity obscured AGN in the local Universe. Our analysis relies on the first data release of the BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS/DR1) and on dedicated observations with the VLT, Palomar, and Keck observatories. We find that the vast majority of our sources agree with commonly used AGN selection criteria which are based on emission line ratios and on mid-infrared colours. Our AGN are predominantly hosted in massive galaxies (9.8 < log(M_*/M_sun) < 11.7); based on visual inspection of archival optical images, they appear to be mostly ellipticals. Otherwise, they do not have distinctive properties. Their radio luminosities, determined from publicly available survey data, show a large spread of almost 4 orders of magnitude - much broader than what is found for lower X-ray luminosity obscured AGN in BASS. Moreover, our sample shows no preferred combination of black hole masses (M_BH) and/or Eddington ratio (lambda_Edd), covering 7.5 < log(M_BH/M_sun) < 10.3 and 0.01 < lambda_Edd < 1. Based on the distribution of our sources in the lambda_Edd-N_H plane, we conclude that our sample is consistent with a scenario where the amount of obscuring material along the line of sight is determined by radiation pressure exerted by the AGN on the dusty circumnuclear gas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07546 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The luminosity-redshift plane for BASS/DR1 AGN. The black circles represent our sample of 28 of the most luminous type-2 AGN in BASS/DR1. We have included in our sample the extremely luminous AGN at the centre of the Phoenix cluster, z = 0.597 (2MASX J23444387−4243124; BAT ID 1204). Blazars and sources within 6◦ of the galactic plane, which are included in the BASS/DR1 population, are not shown. luminosity (L2−10 ke… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of basic X-ray based properties of our sample of high luminosity Swift/BAT type-2 AGN to the general type-2 AGN population in BASS/DR1. Left: the distributions of (ultra-hard X-ray based) bolometric luminosities, log Lbol. Our selected sample of 28 extremely luminous sources, with 45.3 . log(Lbol/erg s−1 ) . 47.2, represents the high-luminosity end of the BASS/DR1 type-2 AGN sample; some sources are not i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Strong line ratio diagnostics (BPT) diagram for 25 sources of our sample. The different symbols mark sources with spectral fitting performed either as part of BASS/DR1 or DR2, and either good or acceptable spec￾tral fitting quality. The dashed lines denote commonly-used demarcations between star-forming galaxies, Seyferts and LINERs, taken from Kewley et al. (2001a, “Ke01”), Kauffmann et al. (2003, “Ka03”), and Scha… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The host galaxies of the AGN in our sample. Left: reverse gr i composite images of the host galaxies for seven of our sources, available from the SDSS. The images size is 5000 × 5000 . Right: giy composite images of the host galaxies for 15 of our sources, available fr…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparing radio and ultra-hard X-ray luminosities for our luminous obscured (type-2) BASS AGN. Left: the radio luminosity, νLν (1.4 GHz) plotted against the ultra-hard X-ray luminosity, L14−195 keV. The blue dots represent all type-2 BASS/DR1 AGN for which NVSS data ar…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The “fundamental plane of BH activity” for our sample, in the context of other BAT AGN studies (Wong et al. 2016). The black solid line represents the fundamental plane, adapted from Merloni et al. (2003). The thick blue dashed line shows the expected relationship if t…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows that our sources are neither very massive, nor have particularly high Eddington ratios. Their BH masses are in the range 7.5 . log(MBH/M ) . 9.3 if we consider only high-quality MBH determinations (i.e., velocity dispersion errors ∆σ∗ 6 20 km s−1 ). This range is…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Eddington ratio - column density diagram reproduced from Ricci et al. (2017c). The diagram shows in black 392 AGN from Koss et al. (2017) for which the black hole mass and the Eddington ratio have been determined. The green shaded area delineates the region where the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

204 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    Abazajian K. N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    Abolfathi B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..235...42A 235, 42

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a 2018

  3. [3]

    A., Fragile P

    Abramowicz M. A., Fragile P. C., 2013, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.12942/lrr-2013-1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013LRR....16....1A 16, 1

    doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-1 2013

  4. [4]

    Acero F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..218...23A 218, 23

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23 2015

  5. [5]

    K., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524984 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..175..297A 175, 297

    Adelman-McCarthy J. K., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524984 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..175..297A 175, 297

    doi:10.1086/524984 2008

  6. [6]

    L., Georgakakis A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2700 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1225A 474, 1225

    Aird J., Coil A. L., Georgakakis A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2700 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1225A 474, 1225

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2700 2018

  7. [7]

    Ajello M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524104 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673...96A 673, 96

    work page doi:10.1086/524104 2008

  8. [8]

    Akiyama M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psx091 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S..34A 70, S34

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx091 2018

Show all 204 references
  1. [9]

    Akylas A., Georgantopoulos I., Ranalli P., Gkiokas E., Corral A., Lanzuisi G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628711 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Alexandroff R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1500 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.3306A 435, 3306

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    T., Rodr \' guez L

    Anglada G., Villuendas E., Estalella R., Beltr \'a n M. T., Rodr \' guez L. F., Torrelles J. M., Curiel S., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300637 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.2953A 116, 2953

    1998 doi

  4. [12]

    Antonucci R., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 , 31, 473

    1993

  5. [13]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/970 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..970A 713, 970

    Assef R. J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/970 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..970A 713, 970

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/27 , 804, 27

    Assef R. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/27 , 804, 27

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Pastoriza M

    Audibert A., Riffel R., Sales D. A., Pastoriza M. G., Ruschel-Dutra D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2477 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.2139A 464, 2139

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    N., Kirhakos S., Saxe D

    Bahcall J. N., Kirhakos S., Saxe D. H., Schneider D. P., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303926 , 479, 642

    1997 doi

  10. [18]

    K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \' c Z ., Lupton R

    Baldry I. K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \' c Z ., Lupton R. H., Nichol R. C., Szalay A. S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380092 , 600, 681

    2004 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    1981 doi

  12. [20]

    Ballo L., Heras F. J. H., Barcons X., Carrera F. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117464 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    Balmaverde B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219561 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  14. [23]

    C., McMahon R

    Banerji M., Alaghband-Zadeh S., Hewett P. C., McMahon R. G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2649 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.3368B 447, 3368

    2015 doi

  15. [24]

    L., Jones G., Wagg J., McMahon R

    Banerji M., Carilli C. L., Jones G., Wagg J., McMahon R. G., Hewett P. C., Alaghband-Zadeh S., Feruglio C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3019 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.4390B 465, 4390

    2017 doi

  16. [25]

    D., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..143B 120, 143

    Barthelmy S. D., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..143B 120, 143

    2005 doi

  17. [26]

    H., Tueller J., Markwardt C

    Baumgartner W. H., Tueller J., Markwardt C. B., Skinner G., Barthelmy S., Mushotzky R. F., Evans P. A., Gehrels N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/19 , 207, 19

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    H., White R

    Becker R. H., White R. L., Helfand D. J., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450..559B 450, 559

    1995 doi

  19. [28]

    F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367829 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...586..794B 586, 794

    Bell E. F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367829 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...586..794B 586, 794

    2003 doi

  20. [30]

    F., McIntosh D

    Bell E. F., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378847 , 149, 289

    doi

  21. [31]

    Berney S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2181 , 454, 3622

    2015 doi

  22. [35]

    D., K \"o nigl A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157262 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...34B 232, 34

    Blandford R. D., K \"o nigl A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157262 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...34B 232, 34

    1979 doi

  23. [36]

    D., Znajek R

    Blandford R. D., Znajek R. L., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.179..433B 179, 433

    1977 doi

  24. [37]

    arXiv:1812.06025

    Blandford R., Meier D., Readhead A., 2018, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181206025B p. arXiv:1812.06025

    2018 arXiv

  25. [38]

    R., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429803 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....129.2562B 129, 2562

    Blanton M. R., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429803 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....129.2562B 129, 2562

    2005 doi

  26. [39]

    Bonchi A., La Franca F., Melini G., Bongiorno A., Fiore F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts456 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.1970B 429, 1970

    2013 doi

  27. [40]

    N., Alexander D

    Brandt W. N., Alexander D. M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-014-0081-z , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  28. [41]

    Burlon D., Ghirlanda G., Murphy T., Chhetri R., Sadler E., Ajello M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt343 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2471B 431, 2471

    2013 doi

  29. [42]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/168 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809..168C 809, 168

    Callingham J. R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/168 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809..168C 809, 168

    2015 doi

  30. [43]

    M., Netzer H., Lira P., Trakhtenbrot B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2266 , 446, 3427

    Capellupo D. M., Netzer H., Lira P., Trakhtenbrot B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2266 , 446, 3427

    2015 doi

  31. [44]

    J., Trakhtenbrot B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/148 , 811, 148

    Caplar N., Lilly S. J., Trakhtenbrot B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/148 , 811, 148

    2015 doi

  32. [45]

    Cappellari M., Emsellem E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381875 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..138C 116, 138

    2004 doi

  33. [46]

    L., Perley R

    Carilli C. L., Perley R. A., Dreher J. W., Leahy J. P., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170813 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...383..554C 383, 554

    1991 doi

  34. [47]

    Castell \'o -Mor N., Netzer H., Kaspi S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw445 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.1839C 458, 1839

    2016 doi

  35. [48]

    J., Cotton W

    Condon J. J., Cotton W. D., Greisen E. W., Yin Q. F., Perley R. A., Taylor G. B., Broderick J. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300337 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1693C 115, 1693

    1998 doi

  36. [50]

    A., Stout D

    Daly R. A., Stout D. A., Mysliwiec J. N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad08b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863..117D 863, 117

    2018 doi

  37. [51]

    I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx045 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4917D 466, 4917

    Davies R. I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx045 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4917D 466, 4917

    2017 doi

  38. [52]

    Deeley S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx441 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.3934D 467, 3934

    2017 doi

  39. [53]

    C., Celotti A., Erlund M

    Fabian A. C., Celotti A., Erlund M. C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00234.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.373L..16F 373, L16

    2006

  40. [54]

    C., Vasudevan R

    Fabian A. C., Vasudevan R. V., Gandhi P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00430.x , 385, L43

    2008

  41. [55]

    C., Vasudevan R

    Fabian A. C., Vasudevan R. V., Mushotzky R. F., Winter L. M., Reynolds C. S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00617.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.394L..89F 394, L89

    2009

  42. [56]

    L., 1995, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A

    Falcke H., Biermann P. L., 1995, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A

    1995

  43. [57]

    Falcke H., K \"o rding E., Markoff S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031683 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A

    2004 doi

  44. [58]

    L., Riley J

    Fanaroff B. L., Riley J. M., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974MNRAS.167P..31F 167, 31P

    1974 doi

  45. [59]

    W., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2016.44 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASA...33...52F 33, e052

    Flesch E. W., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2016.44 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASA...33...52F 33, e052

    2016 doi

  46. [60]

    A., et al., 2016, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205243F ( @eprint arXiv 1612.05243 )

    Flewelling H. A., et al., 2016, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205243F ( @eprint arXiv 1612.05243 )

    2016 arXiv

  47. [61]

    M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C

    Freudling W., Romaniello M., Bramich D. M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C. E., Moehler S., Neeser M. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  48. [62]

    Gehrels N., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422091 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611.1005G 611, 1005

    2004 doi

  49. [63]

    Ghisellini G., Tavecchio F., Maraschi L., Celotti A., Sbarrato T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.515..376G 515, 376

    2014 doi

  50. [64]

    Glikman E., 2017, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/aaa0c0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017RNAAS...1a..48G 1, 48

    2017 doi

  51. [65]

    J., White R

    Glikman E., Helfand D. J., White R. L., Becker R. H., Gregg M. D., Lacy M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521073 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667..673G 667, 673

    2007 doi

  52. [66]

    M., Lacy M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..218G 806, 218

    Glikman E., Simmons B., Mailly M., Schawinski K., Urry C. M., Lacy M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..218G 806, 218

    2015 doi

  53. [67]

    D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab040 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....4G 856, 4

    Goulding A. D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab040 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....4G 856, 4

    2018 doi

  54. [68]

    W., Scott N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/151 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..151G 764, 151

    Graham A. W., Scott N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/151 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..151G 764, 151

    2013 doi

  55. [69]

    E., Zakamska N

    Greene J. E., Zakamska N. L., Ho L. C., Barth A. J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/9 , 732

    2011 doi

  56. [70]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/90 , 773, 90

    Grier C. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/90 , 773, 90

    2013 doi

  57. [71]

    G \" u ltekin K., et al., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/198 , 698, 198

    doi

  58. [72]

    M., Miller J

    G \"u ltekin K., Cackett E. M., Miller J. M., Di Matteo T., Markoff S., Richstone D. O., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/404 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706..404G 706, 404

    doi

  59. [73]

    M., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0165 , 1, 0165

    Harrison C. M., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0165 , 1, 0165

    2017 doi

  60. [74]

    E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1588 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3663H 461, 3663

    Hart R. E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1588 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3663H 461, 3663

    2016 doi

  61. [75]

    Hasinger G., Miyaji T., Schmidt M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042134 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A

    2005 doi

  62. [76]

    M., Best P

    Heckman T. M., Best P. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA

    2014 doi

  63. [78]

    C., Alexander D

    Hickox R. C., Alexander D. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803 , 56, 625

    2018 doi

  64. [79]

    C., Mullaney J

    Hickox R. C., Mullaney J. R., Alexander D. M., Chen C.-T. J., Civano F. M., Goulding A. D., Hainline K. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782....9H 782, 9

    2014 doi

  65. [80]

    C., Lamassa S

    Hickox R. C., Lamassa S. M., Silverman J. D., Kolodzig A., 2016, @doi [IAU Focus Meeting] 10.1017/S1743921316004592 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016IAUFM..29B.113H 29, 113

    2016 doi

  66. [81]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing In Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing In Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  67. [82]

    J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/74 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...74I 835, 74

    Ichikawa K., Ricci C., Ueda Y., Matsuoka K., Toba Y., Kawamuro T., Trakhtenbrot B., Koss M. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/74 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...74I 835, 74

    2017 doi

  68. [83]

    Ichikawa K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaef8f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870...31I 870, 31

    2019 doi

  69. [84]

    Inayoshi K., Haiman Z., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/110 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828..110I 828, 110

    2016 doi

  70. [85]

    H., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...735..112J 735, 112

    Jarrett T. H., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...735..112J 735, 112

    2011 doi

  71. [86]

    H., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/2/68 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144...68J 144, 68

    Jarrett T. H., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/2/68 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144...68J 144, 68

    2012 doi

  72. [88]

    Kaneda H., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309742 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...453L..13K 453, L13

    1995 doi

  73. [89]

    M., Rudnick L., Anderson M

    Katz-Stone D. M., Rudnick L., Anderson M. C., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172536 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...407..549K 407, 549

    1993 doi

  74. [90]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...33K 341, 33

    2003

  75. [91]

    I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D

    Kellermann K. I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D. B., Green R., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115207 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....98.1195K 98, 1195

    1989 doi

  76. [92]

    I., Condon J

    Kellermann K. I., Condon J. J., Kimball A. E., Perley R. A., Ivezi \'c Z ., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/168 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..168K 831, 168

    2016 doi

  77. [93]

    C., Shen Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/45 , 764, 45

    Kelly B. C., Shen Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/45 , 764, 45

    2013 doi

  78. [94]

    J., Heisler C

    Kewley L. J., Heisler C. A., Dopita M. A., Lumsden S., 2001a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318944 , 132, 37

    doi

  79. [95]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321545 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K 556, 121

    doi

  80. [96]

    R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv186 , 456, L109

    King A. R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv186 , 456, L109

    2016 doi

  81. [97]

    Komatsu E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192...18K 192, 18

    2011 doi

  82. [98]

    C., 2018, @doi [ ] arXiv:1804.09852v1 , 859, 116

    Kong M., Ho L. C., 2018, @doi [ ] arXiv:1804.09852v1 , 859, 116

    2018 arXiv

  83. [99]

    K \" o rding E., Falcke H., Corbel S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054144 , 456, 439

    2006 doi

  84. [100]

    418, Galactic Bulges

    Kormendy J., 2016, in Laurikainen E., Peletier R., Gadotti D., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 418, Galactic Bulges. p. 431 ( @eprint arXiv 1504.03330 ), @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_16

    2016 arXiv

  85. [101]

    C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA

    Kormendy J., Ho L. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA

    2013 doi

  86. [102]

    Koss M., Mushotzky R., Veilleux S., Winter L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L125 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716L.125K 716, L125

    2010 doi

  87. [103]

    M., Baumgartner W., Tueller J., Gehrels N., Valencic L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/57 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739...57K 739, 57

    Koss M., Mushotzky R., Veilleux S., Winter L. M., Baumgartner W., Tueller J., Gehrels N., Valencic L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/57 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739...57K 739, 57

    2011 doi

  88. [104]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/85 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...85K 825, 85

    Koss M. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/85 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...85K 825, 85

    2016 doi

  89. [105]

    Koss M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ec9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...74K 850, 74

    2017 doi

  90. [106]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0652-7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.563..214K 563, 214

    Koss M. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0652-7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.563..214K 563, 214

    2018 doi

  91. [107]

    P., Hardcastle M

    Kraft R. P., Hardcastle M. J., Worrall D. M., Murray S. S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/427822 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622..149K 622, 149

    2005 doi

  92. [108]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa87b5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847..100L 847, 100

    LaMassa S. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa87b5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847..100L 847, 100

    2017 doi

  93. [109]

    Lawrence A., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/252.4.586 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991MNRAS.252..586L 252, 586

    1991 doi

  94. [110]

    Lintott C., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17432.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.410..166L 410, 166

    2011

  95. [111]

    M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    Liu R., Pooley G., Riley J. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    1992 doi

  96. [112]

    L., Greene J

    Liu X., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Strauss M. A., Krolik J. H., Heckman T. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1098 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702.1098L 702, 1098

    2009 doi

  97. [113]

    Lutz D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590367 , 684, 853

    2008 doi

  98. [114]

    Maia M. A. G., Machado R. S., Willmer C. N. A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378360 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1750M 126, 1750

    2003 doi

  99. [115]

    Maiolino R., Shemmer O., Imanishi M., Netzer H., Oliva E., Lutz D., Sturm E., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077252 , 468, 979

    2007 doi

  100. [116]

    K., Maiolino R., Salvati M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.351..169M 351, 169

    Marconi A., Risaliti G., Gilli R., Hunt L. K., Maiolino R., Salvati M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.351..169M 351, 169

    2004

  101. [117]

    Maselli A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/17 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..206...17M 206, 17

    2013 doi

  102. [118]

    Massaro E., Maselli A., Leto C., Marchegiani P., Perri M., Giommi P., Piranomonte S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-015-2254-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Ap&SS.357...75M 357, 75

    2015 doi

  103. [120]

    Mateos S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7268 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841L..18M 841, L18

    2017 doi

  104. [121]

    J., Ma C.-P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184 , 764, 184

    McConnell N. J., Ma C.-P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184 , 764, 184

    2013 doi

  105. [122]

    J., Ma C.-p., Gebhardt K., Wright S

    McConnell N. J., Ma C.-p., Gebhardt K., Wright S. A., Murphy J. D., Lauer T. R., Graham J. R., Richstone D. O., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10636 , 480, 215

    2011 doi

  106. [123]

    J., Ma C.-P., Murphy J

    McConnell N. J., Ma C.-P., Murphy J. D., Gebhardt K., Lauer T. R., Graham J. R., Wright S. a., Richstone D. O., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/179 , 756, 179

    2012 doi

  107. [124]

    McDonald M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature11379 , 488, 349

    2012 doi

  108. [125]

    Merloni A., Heinz S., di Matteo T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07017.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345.1057M 345, 1057

    2003

  109. [126]

    R., Hogan M

    Mezcua M., Hlavacek-Larrondo J., Lucey J. R., Hogan M. T., Edge A. C., McNamara B. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2812 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1342M 474, 1342

    2018 doi

  110. [127]

    D., Morrison G

    Mineo S., Gilfanov M., Lehmer B. D., Morrison G. E., Sunyaev R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1999 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.1698M 437, 1698

    2014 doi

  111. [128]

    Mingo B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1307 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.2762M 470, 2762

    2017 doi

  112. [129]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1861 , 462, 4336

    Moffett A. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1861 , 462, 4336

    2016 doi

  113. [130]

    Mountrichas G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx572 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.3042M 468, 3042

    2017 doi

  114. [131]

    R., Mack K.-H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219702 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    Murgia M., Markevitch M., Govoni F., Parma P., Fanti R., de Ruiter H. R., Mack K.-H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219702 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  115. [133]

    Netzer H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302 , 53, 365

    2015 doi

  116. [134]

    M., Best P

    Nisbet D. M., Best P. N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2450 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2551N 455, 2551

    2016 doi

  117. [135]

    Nyland K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3d1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...23N 859, 23

    2018 doi

  118. [136]

    Ochsenbein F., Bauer P., Marcout J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000169 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    2000 doi

  119. [137]

    K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..195...13O 195, 13

    Oh K., Sarzi M., Schawinski K., Yi S. K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..195...13O 195, 13

    2011 doi

  120. [138]

    K., Schawinski K., Koss M., Trakhtenbrot B., Soto K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219....1O 219, 1

    Oh K., Yi S. K., Schawinski K., Koss M., Trakhtenbrot B., Soto K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219....1O 219, 1

    2015 doi

  121. [139]

    Oh K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2467 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.1466O 464, 1466

    2017 doi

  122. [140]

    Oh K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa7fd , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..235....4O 235, 4

    2018 doi

  123. [141]

    E., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159306 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...249..462O 249, 462

    Osterbrock D. E., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159306 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...249..462O 249, 462

    1981 doi

  124. [142]

    Pacucci F., Natarajan P., Ferrara A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L36 , 835, L36

    2017 doi

  125. [143]

    Padmanabhan N., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524677 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674.1217P 674, 1217

    2008 doi

  126. [144]

    Padovani P., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/263.2.461 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.263..461P 263, 461

    1993 doi

  127. [145]

    Padovani P., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0194 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1E.194P 1, 0194

    2017 doi

  128. [146]

    Panessa F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2455 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.1289P 447, 1289

    2015 doi

  129. [148]

    C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd7f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858..110P 858, 110

    Powell M. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd7f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858..110P 858, 110

    2018 doi

  130. [149]

    E., Crenshaw D

    Rafter S. E., Crenshaw D. M., Wiita P. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/42 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137...42R 137, 42

    2009 doi

  131. [150]

    pp E1.19--6--14

    Ramos Almeida C., 2014, in 40th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. pp E1.19--6--14

    2014

  132. [151]

    Ramos Almeida C., Ricci C., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1..679R 1, 679

    2017 doi

  133. [153]

    E., Volonteri M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82 , 813, 82

    Reines A. E., Volonteri M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82 , 813, 82

    2015 doi

  134. [154]

    Reyes R., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2373 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2373R 136, 2373

    2008 doi

  135. [155]

    J., Trakhtenbrot B., Bauer F

    Ricci C., Ueda Y., Koss M. J., Trakhtenbrot B., Bauer F. E., Gandhi P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815L..13R 815, L13

    2015 doi

  136. [156]

    Ricci C., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..233...17R 233, 17

    doi

  137. [157]

    Ricci C., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx173 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.1273R 468, 1273

    doi

  138. [158]

    Ricci C., et al., 2017c, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature23906 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.549..488R 549, 488

    doi

  139. [159]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    2006 doi

  140. [160]

    R., Diamond-Stanic A

    Rigby J. R., Diamond-Stanic A. M., Aniano G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1878 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700.1878R 700, 1878

    2009 doi

  141. [161]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...14R 773, 14

    Ross N. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...14R 773, 14

    2013 doi

  142. [162]

    P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1710 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.3932R 453, 3932

    Ross N. P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1710 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.3932R 453, 3932

    2015 doi

  143. [163]

    Satyapal S., Vega D., Heckman T., O'Halloran B., Dudik R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519995 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663L...9S 663, L9

    2007 doi

  144. [164]

    Sazonov S., Churazov E., Krivonos R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2069 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1202S 454, 1202

    2015 doi

  145. [167]

    Schulze A., Wisotzki L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014193 , 516, A87

    2010 doi

  146. [168]

    Schulze A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2549 , 447, 2085

    2015 doi

  147. [169]

    J., Satyapal S., Gliozzi M., Cheung C

    Secrest N. J., Satyapal S., Gliozzi M., Cheung C. C., Seth A. C., B \"o ker T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753...38S 753, 38

    2012 doi

  148. [170]

    J., Dudik R

    Secrest N. J., Dudik R. P., Dorland B. N., Zacharias N., Makarov V., Fey A., Frouard J., Finch C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/12 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..221...12S 221, 12

    2015 doi

  149. [171]

    M., Corbett E

    Shemmer O., Netzer H., Maiolino R., Oliva E., Croom S. M., Corbett E. A., di Fabrizio L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423607 , 614, 547

    2004 doi

  150. [172]

    Sikora M., Stawarz ., Lasota J.-P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/511972 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...658..815S 658, 815

    2007 doi

  151. [173]

    Simpson C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09043.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.360..565S 360, 565

    2005

  152. [174]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    2006 doi

  153. [175]

    Stern J., Laor A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt211 , 431, 836

    2013 doi

  154. [176]

    Stern D., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/30 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753...30S 753, 30

    2012 doi

  155. [177]

    Stern D., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/102 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794..102S 794, 102

    2014 doi

  156. [178]

    Tadhunter C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-016-0094-x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  157. [179]

    B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Taylor M. B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV. p. 29

    2005

  158. [180]

    Trakhtenbrot B., Netzer H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22056.x , 427, 3081

    2012

  159. [181]

    Trakhtenbrot B., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/4 , 825, 4

    2016 doi

  160. [182]

    Trakhtenbrot B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1117 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470..800T 470, 800

    2017 doi

  161. [183]

    H., Dullemond C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586698 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..140T 679, 140

    Treister E., Krolik J. H., Dullemond C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586698 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..140T 679, 140

    2008 doi

  162. [184]

    M., Simmons B

    Treister E., Schawinski K., Urry C. M., Simmons B. D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L39 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758L..39T 758, L39

    2012 doi

  163. [185]

    Ueda Y., Akiyama M., Ohta K., Miyaji T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378940 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...598..886U 598, 886

    2003 doi

  164. [186]

    Ueda S., Hayashida K., Anabuki N., Nakajima H., Koyama K., Tsunemi H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...33U 778, 33

    2013 doi

  165. [187]

    G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/104 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786..104U 786, 104

    Ueda Y., Akiyama M., Hasinger G., Miyaji T., Watson M. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/104 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786..104U 786, 104

    2014 doi

  166. [188]

    M., Padovani P., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133630 , 107, 803

    Urry C. M., Padovani P., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133630 , 107, 803

    1995 doi

  167. [189]

    V., Fabian A

    Vasudevan R. V., Fabian A. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x , 381, 1235

    2007

  168. [191]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    Veilleux S., Osterbrock D. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    1987 doi

  169. [192]

    Veilleux S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/587 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701..587V 701, 587

    2009 doi

  170. [193]

    Vernet J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    2011 doi

  171. [194]

    S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/800 , 699, 800

    Vestergaard M., Osmer P. S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/800 , 699, 800

    2009 doi

  172. [195]

    G., Colina L., Arribas S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19622.x , 418, 2032

    Villar-Mart \' i n M., Humphrey A., Delgado R. G., Colina L., Arribas S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19622.x , 418, 2032

    2011

  173. [196]

    Villar-Mart \' i n M., Arribas S., Emonts B., Humphrey A., Tadhunter C., Bessiere P., Cabrera Lavers A., Ramos Almeida C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw901 , 460, 130

    2016 doi

  174. [197]

    J., Sollerman J., Zackrisson E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d5a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..110V 837, 110

    Villarroel B., Nyholm A., Karlsson T., Comer \'o n S., Korn A. J., Sollerman J., Zackrisson E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d5a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..110V 837, 110

    2017 doi

  175. [198]

    Vito F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3120 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.4528V 474, 4528

    2018 doi

  176. [199]

    Vollmer B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913460 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  177. [200]

    Wang F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L9 , 807, L9

    2015 doi

  178. [201]

    T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15345.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1803W 400, 1803

    Watabe Y., Kawakatu N., Imanishi M., Takeuchi T. T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15345.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1803W 400, 1803

    2009

  179. [202]

    K., Schawinski K., Bruderer C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw756 , 459, 2150

    Weigel A. K., Schawinski K., Bruderer C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw756 , 459, 2150

    2016 doi

  180. [203]

    K., Schawinski K., Caplar N., Wong O

    Weigel A. K., Schawinski K., Caplar N., Wong O. I., Treister E., Trakhtenbrot B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa803b , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845..134W 845, 134

    2017 doi

  181. [204]

    K., Schawinski K., Treister E., Trakhtenbrot B., Sanders D

    Weigel A. K., Schawinski K., Treister E., Trakhtenbrot B., Sanders D. B., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty383 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.2308W 476, 2308

    2018 doi

  182. [205]

    L., Becker R

    White R. L., Becker R. H., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191656 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...79..331W 79, 331

    1992 doi

  183. [206]

    W., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1458 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.2835W 435, 2835

    Willett K. W., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1458 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.2835W 435, 2835

    2013 doi

  184. [207]

    I., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw957 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.1588W 460, 1588

    Wong O. I., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw957 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.1588W 460, 1588

    2016 doi

  185. [208]

    C., Riechers D

    Woo J.-H., Schulze A., Park D., Kang W.-R., Kim S. C., Riechers D. a., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/49 , 772, 49

    2013 doi

  186. [209]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , 140, 1868

    2010 doi

  187. [210]

    Wu X.-B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14241 , 518, 512

    2015 doi

  188. [211]

    Wu J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9ff3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852...96W 852, 96

    2018 doi

  189. [212]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    2000 doi

  190. [213]

    C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1034 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703.1034Y 703, 1034

    Yuan F., Yu Z., Ho L. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1034 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703.1034Y 703, 1034

    2009 doi

  191. [214]

    A., Zakamska N

    Yuan S., Strauss M. A., Zakamska N. L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1747 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1603Y 462, 1603

    2016 doi

  192. [215]

    L., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378610 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.2125Z 126, 2125

    Zakamska N. L., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378610 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.2125Z 126, 2125

    2003 doi

  193. [216]

    L., Strauss M

    Zakamska N. L., Strauss M. A., Heckman T. M., Ivezi \'c Z ., Krolik J. H., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423220 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.1002Z 128, 1002

    2004 doi

  194. [217]

    L., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506986 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132.1496Z 132, 1496

    Zakamska N. L., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506986 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132.1496Z 132, 1496

    2006 doi

  195. [218]

    H., Becker R

    de Vries W. H., Becker R. H., White R. L., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499303 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131..666D 131, 666

    2006 doi

  196. [219]

    C., Varoquaux G., 2011, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CSE....13b..22V 13, 22

    van der Walt S., Colbert S. C., Varoquaux G., 2011, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CSE....13b..22V 13, 22

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.