Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Paper-folding models for the CAR algebra

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The CAR algebra contains countably many non-standard Cantor-spectrum diagonals, one for each diagonal dimension from 0 to infinity.

desk verdict Genuinely new construction: paper-folding subshift yields non-AF Cantor diagonals in the CAR algebra and countably many diagonal-dimension values; two small technical glitches, both repairable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04837 v2 pith:HFBC7GWE submitted 2025-08-06 math.OA math.DSmath.FA

Grigoris Kopsacheilis , Wilhelm Winter This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OAmath.DSmath.FA MSC 46L3546L5537B10
keywords CARalgebraC*-diagonalpaper-foldingsequenceCantorspectrumdiagonaldimensioncrossedproductinfinitedihedralgroupK-theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a structural fact about the CAR algebra $M_{2^\infty}$, the infinite tensor product of $2\times 2$ matrix algebras: it contains a $C^*$-diagonal with Cantor spectrum that is not conjugate to the standard AF diagonal. The proof shows that the regular paper-folding sequence defines a free minimal action of the infinite dihedral group $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2$ on a Cantor space; the crossed product of that action, after tensoring with $M_{2^\infty}$, is classifiable and turns out to be $M_{2^\infty}$ itself. The resulting diagonal is proved non-AF by detecting an intermediate subalgebra with nonzero $K_1$, which an AF diagonal could not have. The same construction, using tensor powers, gives diagonals with diagonal dimension equal to any prescribed $n\in\{0,1,2,\dots,\infty\}$, hence countably many pairwise non-conjugate Cantor-spectrum diagonals.

What carries the argument

The paper-folding subshift $X$: the closure of bi-infinite binary sequences whose finite words all appear in the regular paper-folding sequence $\mathbf{t}$. Its two features doing all the work are (1) invariance of the language under anti-reversal, so $\sigma(x)_j=1-x_{-j}$ maps $X$ to itself and anti-commutes with the shift, and (2) the absence of anti-palindromes longer than 6, which makes the $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2$ action free. K-theory is computed by a four-letter substitution $\varrho$ (the block code of 2-bit blocks), via dimension-group methods, and then by a theorem from [47] for crossed products of Cantor minimal $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2$ systems. Classification theo

What would settle it

Scan the initial segments of the paper-folding sequence for an 8-letter anti-palindrome, i.e. a word $w$ equal to its bit-swapped reversal, such as $01101001$. The proof asserts that none occurs and that the absence propagates under the recursive rule (1.5); finding one as a subword of any $t_n$ would give a fixed point of $\varphi\sigma$, making the action non-free and invalidating the construction of the diagonal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the language of the paper-folding sequence $\mathbf{t}$ is closed under anti-reversal (bit-swap plus reversal) and contains no anti-palindromic word of length exceeding 6. Consequently the shift $\varphi$ together with the anti-reversal involution $\sigma$ gives a free minimal action $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2\curvearrowright X$ on the paper-folding subshift $X\subset\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{Z}}$, which is a Cantor space. The authors compute the ordered $K_0$ of the crossed product $C(X)\rtimes(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2)$ as $\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}[\tfrac12]$ with the positive cone determined by the dyadic rationals, and $K_1=0$, using a four-letter substi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the paper-folding sequence contains no anti-palindromic subword of length greater than 6, so the anti-reversal involution has no fixed point in the subshift and the $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2$ action is free; if arbitrarily long anti-palindromes appeared, the pair would still be Cartan but not a $C^*$-diagonal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The CAR algebra contains at least countably many pairwise non-conjugate $C^*$-diagonals with Cantor spectrum, indexed by diagonal dimension $n\in\{0,1,\dots,\infty\}$.
  • A UHF algebra, which cannot be an integer crossed product because $K_1$ would be nonzero, can nonetheless harbour diagonals built from dynamical systems—here the infinite dihedral group acting on the paper-folding subshift.
  • The example answers negatively the question from [43, Problems XLVII–XLVIII] whether every Cantor-spectrum $C^*$-diagonal in $M_{2^\infty}$ is conjugate to the AF diagonal.
  • It resolves the problem raised in [31, Remark 6.10]: an AF inclusion can have nonzero diagonal dimension even when the diagonal itself is AF.
  • Tensor products of the non-AF diagonal with the standard diagonal give diagonals inside $M_{2^\infty}$ with arbitrary finite diagonal dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same substitution/anti-reversal construction may work for other self-similar binary sequences with bounded anti-palindrome length, producing further non-AF Cantor-spectrum diagonals in $M_{2^\infty}$ or in other UHF algebras; this is a natural next step suggested by the method.
  • Diagonal dimension is a computable numerical invariant that separates the constructed diagonals, but it is unlikely to be a complete invariant; finer invariants such as groupoid cohomology (along the lines of Matui's HK conjecture) might classify the full family.
  • The construction indicates that strongly self-absorbing algebras generally may carry many distinct Cantor-spectrum diagonals; if the same phenomenon holds for the Jiang–Su algebra or Cuntz algebras with a prescribed spectrum, it would reinforce the view that existence of Cartan subalgebras is a subtle, non-unique feature even in classifiable algebras.
  • A testable extension: replace the regular paper-folding sequence by other folding sequences (left/right patterns) and check whether the anti-palindrome bound persists; each such sequence would give a candidate free $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_2$ action and hence a new diagonal in the CAR algebra, possibly with different K-theoretic data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs, for each n in {0,1,2,...,∞}, a C*-diagonal (D ⊂ M_{2^∞}) with Cantor spectrum and diagonal dimension n. For n=1 this gives a Cantor-spectrum diagonal in the CAR algebra that is not conjugate to the standard AF diagonal, answering a question of Blackadar and, for general n, a problem raised in [31, Remark 6.10]. The construction uses the paper-folding subshift X, the free minimal Z⋊Z2 action generated by the shift and anti-reversal, and a substitution subshift X_ϱ used to compute the K-theory of C(X)⋊Z. The crossed product A=C(X)⋊(Z⋊Z2) is shown to be classifiable with K0(A)≅Z2⊕Z[1/2]; tensoring with M_{2^∞} and applying classification gives B≅M_{2^∞}, while the intermediate non-AF subalgebra obstruction shows the diagonal is not AF. Diagonal dimension theory then distinguishes the tensor powers D^{⊗n}. The main technical proof is the K-theory computation in Section 2, and the main gap is in Lemma 2.3, where the clopen partition X=X^(0)⊔X^(1) is not justified as written.

Significance. If the technical issue in Lemma 2.3 is repaired, the results are significant. They provide the first Cantor-spectrum C*-diagonals in the CAR algebra that are not AF diagonals, and they produce countably many pairwise non-conjugate such diagonals distinguished by diagonal dimension. The construction is explicit, the dependence on classification theory is carefully documented, and the use of the paper-folding sequence is natural and self-contained. The paper also gives a satisfying resolution of [31, Remark 6.10]. The proofs are largely built from established theorems (classification, Künneth, diagonal dimension, Thomsen's K-theory of Z⋊Z2 crossed products), and the paper is careful about pointing out where quoted results are used. The main issue is local but load-bearing: Lemma 2.3 must be rewritten before the K-theory computation is rigorous.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2, Lemma 2.3 (Eqs. (2.17)-(2.18), claims (ii)-(iii))] The sets X^(0) and X^(1) are defined as raw φ²-orbits, hence are countable. Claim (ii) asserts X^(0)⊔X^(1)=X with both clopen; a countable subset of a Cantor space is not clopen unless finite, and a non-periodic orbit is not closed. Claim (iii) asserts β(X^(0))=X_ϱ, impossible since β(X^(0)) is countable while X_ϱ is a Cantor space. The proof should pass to orbit closures. This matters because Proposition 2.4 uses p=χ_{X^(0)} as a clopen projection and identifies A≅M_2(B); all subsequent K-theory and Theorems 3.1 and 3.4 rely on this step.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 3.1] K_1((C(X)⋊_φ Z)⊗M_{2^∞}) is Z[1/2], not Z, by the Künneth formula and K_1(C(X)⋊_φ Z)≅Z; since the argument only needs nonvanishing K_1, this is a local error.
  2. [Lemma 2.3] After the orbit-closure correction, the reduction to k∈N in (2.19) should be justified; citing [39, Lemma 5.2] is insufficient in the new formulation.
  3. [Proposition 1.2(iii)] The finite checks for t4 and t̂3 1 t3 are asserted as 'directly seen'; an explicit verification table would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the construction and computations are self-contained; the only flagged concern is a non-circular technical gap in Lemma 2.3.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained relative to external results. Proposition 1.2 proves the anti-palindrome bound in the text, and Corollary 1.5 follows from Lemma 1.1 and Proposition 1.3. The K-theory of the auxiliary substitution subshift is computed from the explicit matrix M via Durand–Host–Skau [18, Cor. 33] and the inductive limit is identified directly in Proposition 2.2. The paper-folding subshift is connected to the substitution subshift through the explicit coding β in Lemma 2.3/Proposition 2.4. The Z⋊Z2 crossed-product K-theory uses Thomsen [47], Putnam [40], and Bratteli–Evans–Kishimoto [12]/Natsume [36], all external; Lemma 2.6 establishes nontriviality of σ by a direct orbit-sum argument. The final tensor-product step uses the Künneth formula and classification theory [53,51], plus Power [38] for AF-diagonal uniqueness and Archbold–Kumjian [1] for intermediate subalgebras; none of these presupposes the theorem. The self-citation to Li–Liao–Winter [31] supplies the definition and general structural properties of diagonal dimension; it is a framework, not a fitted input tailored to force the conclusion, and the constructed pairs are new. I therefore find no circular reduction. Separately, I flag a non-circular correctness concern: Lemma 2.3 defines X^(0) and X^(1) as literal φ²- and φ^{2k+1}-orbits of a point and claims they are clopen and union to X; as written, orbits in a Cantor space are countable and not closed, so the proof must intend orbit closures. This affects Proposition 2.4's clopen projection p and hence the K-theory chain, but it is a missing justification rather than a circularity, so it does not change the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities. The proofs rely on established classification and K-theory results, the combinatorial properties of the paper-folding sequence proven in Section 1, and the diagonal dimension framework developed in prior work of Li, Liao and Winter.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Elliott classification theorem: simple, separable, unital, nuclear, Z-stable C*-algebras satisfying UCT are classified by ordered K0 with order unit and tracial states (Tikuisis-White-Winter [51], Winter [53]).
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to conclude B ≅ M_{2^∞} from the computed K-theory and unique trace (Section 3, after the Künneth computation).
  • standard math Künneth formula for K-theory of minimal tensor products (Blackadar [5], Schochet [44]).
    Used in Theorem 3.1 and in the intermediate algebra argument to compute K-theory of tensor products.
  • domain assumption Thomsen's theorem: K0 of a crossed product by a free minimal Z ⋊ Z2 action has the form Z2 ⊕ (1+σ_*)(C(Ω,Z)/im(1−φ_*)) (Thomsen [47, Theorem 4.42]).
    Used in Remark 2.8 and Proposition 2.9 to compute K0(A) for the paper-folding action.
  • domain assumption Durand-Host-Skau computation of K0 of primitive substitution subshifts (Corollary 33 in [18]).
    Used in Proposition 2.2 to compute K0(C(Xϱ)⋊Z) for the auxiliary substitution subshift.
  • domain assumption Archbold-Kumjian: intermediate sub-C*-algebras of an AF diagonal are AF ([1]).
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to show the new diagonal is not conjugate to an AF diagonal, using the non-AF intermediate subalgebra.
  • domain assumption Li-Liao-Winter diagonal dimension theory, including equality with dynamic asymptotic dimension for Cantor spaces ([31, Theorem 5.4]) and monotonicity under subgroups.
    Used in Theorem 3.4 to compute dim_diag of the tensor power diagonals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Paper-folding models for the CAR algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HFBC7GWE

@misc{pith2026250804837,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Paper-folding models for the CAR algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HFBC7GWE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04837}
}
read the original abstract

We show that the CAR algebra admits a Cantor spectrum C*-diagonal that is not conjugate to the standard AF diagonal. We obtain this by classification theory of C*-algebras, and the diagonal arises by realising the CAR algebra as the crossed product of a free minimal action on the Cantor space, where the acting group is the product of a locally finite group with the infinite dihedral group. The main ingredient in the construction is a binary subshift associated to the well-known regular paper-folding sequence. Moreover, we show that the CAR algebra in fact admits countably many, pairwise non-conjugate, Cantor spectrum diagonals which are distinguished by the different values of their diagonal dimension, as defined by Li, Liao and the second named author.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A C*-diagonal in the Jiang-Su algebra via entangled matrix cones

    math.OA 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    An explicit inductive system of entangled dimension-drop algebras realises Z and yields a C*-diagonal with one-dimensional non-locally-connected spectrum, via a new normaliser characterisation by state excision.

  2. Functoriality and Weyl Groupoids of Ample C*-Diagonal Pairs

    math.OA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper initiates a functorial study by constructing induced partial morphisms on Weyl groupoids from morphisms of ample C*-diagonal pairs and proves applications including tensor product identification and subaddit...

  3. On a C*-Diagonal Generated by the Toric Code

    math.OA 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The toric-code stabilizer algebra is a C*-diagonal of M_{2^∞} equivalent to the canonical diagonal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    R. J. Archbold and A. Kumjian. Nuclear subalgebras of UHF algebras. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 29(1) (1986), 97–100

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    R. J. Archbold and J. S. Spielberg. Topologically free actions and ideals in discrete C∗-dynamical systems. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 37(1) (1994), 119–124

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Barlak and X

    S. Barlak and X. Li. Cartan subalgebras and the UCT problem. Adv. Math. 316 (2017), 758–769

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Witten multiple zeta values attached to sl(4)

    J. Berstel, L. Boasson, O. Carton and I. Fagnot. Infinite words without palindrome. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:0903.2383 (2009)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. K-theory for operator algebras. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Operator Algebras: Theory of C∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras . Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 122. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Symmetries of the CAR algebra. Ann. of Math. (2) 131(3) (1990), 589–623

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    B¨ onicke

    C. B¨ onicke. On the dynamic asymptotic dimension of ´ etale groupoids. Math. Z. 307(1) (2024), 16

    work page 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    B¨ onicke, C

    C. B¨ onicke, C. Dell’Aiera, J. Gabe and R. Willett. Dynamic asymptotic dimension and Matui’s HK conjecture. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 126(4) (2023), 1182–1253

    2023

  2. [10]

    B¨ onicke and K

    C. B¨ onicke and K. Li. Nuclear dimension of subhomogeneous twisted groupoid C ∗- algebras and dynamic asymptotic dimension. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2024(16) (2024), 11597–11610

    2024

  3. [11]

    Boyle and D

    M. Boyle and D. Handelman. Entropy versus orbit equivalence for minimal homeo- morphisms. Pac. J. Math. 164(1) (1994), 1–13

    1994

  4. [12]

    Bratteli, D

    O. Bratteli, D. E. Evans and A. Kishimoto. Crossed products of totally disconnected spaces by Z2 ∗ Z2. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 13(3) (1993), 445–484

    1993

  5. [13]

    H. Bruin. Topological and ergodic theory of symbolic dynamics. American Mathemat- ical Society 228, Providence, RI (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Castillejos, S

    J. Castillejos, S. Evington, A. Tikuisis, S. White and W. Winter. Nuclear dimension of simple C ∗-algebras. Invent. Math. 224(1) (2021), 245–290

    2021

  7. [15]

    R. J. Deeley, I. F. Putnam and K. R. Strung. Constructing minimal homeomorphisms on point-like spaces and a dynamical presentation of the Jiang–Su algebra. J. Reine Angew. Math. 742 (2018), 241–261

    2018

  8. [16]

    F. M. Dekking, M. M. France and A. J. van der Poorten. Folds! I–III. Math. Intell. (1982) 4(3) 130–138, 4(4) 173–181, 4(4) 190–195

    1982

  9. [17]

    Downarowicz and G

    T. Downarowicz and G. Zhang. Symbolic extensions of amenable group actions and the comparison property. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 281 (2023), 1–108. 24 GRIGORIS KOPSACHEILIS AND WILHELM WINTER

    2023

  10. [18]

    Durand, B

    F. Durand, B. Host and C. Skau. Substitutional dynamical systems, Bratteli diagrams and dimension groups. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 19(4) (1999), 953–993

    1999

  11. [19]

    E. G. Effros and C. Shen. Approximately finite C ∗-algebras and continued fractions. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 29(2) (1980), 191–204

    1980

  12. [20]

    D. G. Evans and A. Sims. When is the Cuntz–Krieger algebra of a higher-rank graph approximately finite-dimensional? J. Funct. Anal. 263(1) (2012), 183–215

    2012

  13. [21]

    Evington and P

    S. Evington and P. Sibbel. C ∗-diagonals with Cantor spectrum in Cuntz algebras. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.22163 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Feldman and C

    J. Feldman and C. Moore. Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomologies, von Neumann algebras. I, II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1977) 234 289–324, 234(2) 325–359

    1977

  15. [23]

    N. P. Fogg. Substitution in dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1794. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    L. Fuchs. Abelian groups. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1960)

    1960

  17. [25]

    Giordano, I

    T. Giordano, I. F. Putnam and C. F. Skau. Topological orbit equivalence and C ∗- crossed products. J. Reine Angew. Math. 469 (1995), 51–112

    1995

  18. [26]

    Guentner, R

    E. Guentner, R. Willett and G. Yu. Dynamic asymptotic dimension: relation to dynamics, topology, coarse geometry, and C ∗-algebras. Math. Ann. 367(1) (2017), 785–829

    2017

  19. [27]

    D. Kerr. Dimension, comparison and almost finiteness. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 22(11) (2020), 3697–3745

    2020

  20. [28]

    A. Kumjian. On C ∗-diagonals. Canad. J. Math. 38(4) (1986), 969–1008

    1986

  21. [29]

    A. Kumjian. On the K-theory of the symmetrized non-commutative torus. C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 12(3) (1990), 87–90

    1990

  22. [30]

    Kumjian and D

    A. Kumjian and D. Pask. Higher rank graph C∗-algebras. New York J. Math. 6 (2000), 1–20

    2000

  23. [31]

    K. Li, H. Liao and W. Winter. The diagonal dimension of sub-C ∗-algebras. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:2303.16762 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Li and J

    X. Li and J. Renault. Cartan subalgebras in C ∗-algebras. Existence and uniqueness. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372(3) (2019), 1985–2010

    2019

  25. [33]

    H. Lin. The tracial topological rank of C ∗-algebras. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 83(1) (2001), 199–234

    2001

  26. [34]

    H. Matui. Homology and topological full groups of ´ etale groupoids on totally discon- nected spaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 104(1) (2012), 27–56

    2012

  27. [35]

    Mitscher and J

    I. Mitscher and J. Spielberg. AF C ∗-algebras from non-AF groupoids. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375(10) (2022), 7372–7371

    2022

  28. [36]

    K-theory for certain group C ∗- algebras

    T. Natsume. On K ∗(C∗(SL2(Z))) (Appendix to “K-theory for certain group C ∗- algebras” by E. C. Lance). J. Oper. Th. 13 (1985), 103–118

    1985

  29. [37]

    Ortega and E

    E. Ortega and E. Scarparo. Almost finiteness and homology of certain non-free ac- tions. Groups Geom. Dyn. 17(1) (2023), 77–90

    2023

  30. [38]

    S. C. Power. Limit algebras: an introduction to subalgebras of C∗-subalgebras. Pitman Research Notices in Mathematics 278. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow

  31. [39]

    I. F. Putnam. Cantor minimal systems . American Mathematical Society 77, Provi- dence, RI (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    I. F. Putnam. The C ∗-algebras associated with minimal homeomorphisms of the Cantor set. Pac. J. Math. 136(2) (1989), 329–353

    1989

  33. [41]

    J. Renault. Cartan subalgebras in C ∗-algebras. Irish Math. Soc. Bull. 61 (2008), 29–63

    2008

  34. [42]

    Rørdam and E

    M. Rørdam and E. Størmer. Classification of Nuclear C∗-algebras. Entropy in Oper- ator Algebras. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 126. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    Schafhauser, A

    C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis and S. White. Nuclear C ∗-algebras: 99 problems. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.10902 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Schochet

    C. Schochet. Topological methods for C ∗-algebras. II. Geometry resolutions and the K¨ unneth formula.Pac. J. Math. 98(2) (1982), 443–458

    1982

  37. [45]

    Sibbel and W

    P. Sibbel and W. Winter. A Cantor spectrum diagonal in O2. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., to appear. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:2409.03511 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Tabachnikov

    S. Tabachnikov. Dragon curves revisited. Math. Intell. 36 (2014), 13–17. PAPER-FOLDING MODELS FOR THE CAR ALGEBRA 25

    2014

  39. [47]

    K. Thomsen. The homoclinic and heteroclinic C ∗-algebras of a generalized one- dimensional solenoid. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 30(1) (2010), 263–308

    2010

  40. [48]

    Tikuisis, S

    A. Tikuisis, S. White and W. Winter. Quasidiagonality of nuclear C ∗-algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) 185(1) (2017), 229–284

    2017

  41. [49]

    A. S. Toms and W. Winter. Minimal dynamics and K-theoretic rigidity: Elliott’s conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal. 23(1) (2013), 467–481

    2013

  42. [50]

    A. Vershik. Nonmeasurable decompositions, orbit theory, algebras of operators. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 199 (1971), 1004–1007

    1971

  43. [51]

    S. White. Abstract classification theorems for amenable C ∗-algebras. Proc. Int. Congr. Math. , 4 (2022), 3314–3338. EMS Press, 2023

    2022

  44. [52]

    W. Winter. Nuclear dimension and Z-stability of pure C ∗-algebras. Invent. Math. 187(2) (2012), 259–342

    2012

  45. [53]

    W. Winter. Structure of nuclear C ∗-algebras: from quasidiagonality to classification and back again. Proc. Int. Congr. Math. 2 (2018), 1797–1820. World Scientific, 2019. Grigoris Kopsacheilis, Mathematisches Institut, F achbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Universit¨at M¨...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.