Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Amp\`ere phase in frustrated magnets

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A curl-free local constraint defines a new 'Ampère phase' whose spin correlations decay as $r^{-d}$, a distinct algebraic spin liquid in frustrated magnets.

desk verdict A mostly correct, clean extension of Henley's framework to curl-free constraints with a genuine 3D Monte Carlo check of the d exponent, but the abstract oversells the power-law decay because the 3D correlations carry a constant offset and the sampling is sector-restricted. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08859 v1 pith:HGG55JET submitted 2025-01-15 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.other

N. Rougemaille , J. Coraux , B. Canals This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.other
keywords Ampèrephasealgebraicspinliquidcurl-freeconstraintCoulombfrustratedmagnetismicepyrochlorelatticecooperativeparamagnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a new class of classical spin liquid, the Ampère phase, defined by a local curl-free condition on the coarse-grained magnetization field instead of the divergence-free (Gauss) condition that defines Coulomb phases such as spin ice. It argues that in any macroscopically degenerate ground-state manifold with cooperative-paramagnet statistics, this curl-free constraint forces spin-spin correlations to decay algebraically with distance, with exponent equal to the space dimension $d$: the phase is a $d$-algebraic spin liquid. Because the constraint is an Ampère law rather than a Gauss law, the elementary excitations are not magnetic monopoles but vectorial magnetic loops, i.e., fictional current lines associated with sources of magnetization curl. The authors demonstrate the physics with Monte Carlo simulations on a 2D square-lattice Ising model and a 3D pyrochlore vertex model, showing that thermodynamic properties match the Coulomb counterparts while the magnetic structure factors are complementary. A sympathetic reader would care because this extends the electromagnetism analogy for frustrated magnets and predicts a distinct, experimentally distinguishable form of algebraic disorder.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coarse-grained magnetization vector field $\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r})$ built from large cells of elementary spin variables, assumed independent and identically distributed and symmetric, so the central limit theorem gives a centered Gaussian distribution with variance $\sigma^2 = V/K$. An Ampère phase is characterized by the local constraint $\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = 0$, whose reciprocal-space form $\mathbf{q} \times \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{q}) = \mathbf{0}$ forces $\mathbf{F}$ to lie along $\mathbf{q}$; substituting this into the Gaussian free energy $F/k_B T \propto (K/2)\sum_{\mathbf{q}} |\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{q})|^2$ yields the longitudinal correlation tensor $q^\mu q^\nu/q^2$. This longitudinal projector is the exact complement of the Coulomb phase's transverse projector $\delta^{\mu\nu} - q^\mu q^\nu/q^2$, and it is the identity that carries the argument: it produces algebraic real-space decay $r^{-d}$, complementary pinch points in the structure factor, and the current-line interpretation of defects.

What would settle it

Take a model with only a local curl-free constraint on a macroscopically degenerate manifold and compute the real-space equal-time spin correlation along a lattice direction: the paper predicts $C(r) \sim a r^{-d}$ (plus an optional constant in 3D), so a measured exponent differing from $d$ by more than the statistical error, or a structure factor that is not dominated by the longitudinal component $q^\mu q^\nu/q^2$, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the curl-free constraint $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}) = 0$ on the coarse-grained magnetization field $\mathbf{F}$ produces an algebraic spin liquid whose reciprocal-space correlations are the longitudinal projector $\langle F^\mu(\mathbf{q}) F^\nu(\mathbf{q})\rangle = (1/K)\, q^\mu q^\nu/q^2$, the exact complement of the Coulomb phase's transverse projector. From this identity the paper derives real-space decay $\sim r^{-d}$ in dimension $d$, valid in any dimension, and identifies the topological defects as sources of magnetization curl: vectorial excitations interpreted as fictional current lines via Ampère's theorem. The paper constructs a 2D Ising Hamiltonian (nearest-neighbor $J_1$ plus third-neighbor $J_3$ with $J_1 = -J_3$) whose low-energy manifold is curl-free and, through a spin-pair translation, thermodynamically equivalent to square ice; Monte Carlo confirms complementary structure factors and matching specific heat, residual entropy, and $1/T$ susceptibility. In three dimensions it implements the curl-free constraint in a pyrochlore vertex model and uses an all-in/all-out cluster dynamics, finding algebraic spin correlations with exponent $b = 3.018 \pm 0.030$, consistent with $d = 3$, together with a constant contribution that produces emerging Bragg peaks, evidence that Ampère phases, like Coulomb phases, can fragment.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the elementary spin variables in the ground-state manifold are independent and identically distributed, so the coarse-grained vector field obeys a centered Gaussian law; if microscopic correlations break this assumption, the predicted $r^{-d}$ decay need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The curl-free manifold is a $d$-algebraic spin liquid: spin correlations decay as $r^{-d}$ in $d$ dimensions, giving a concrete scattering signature.
  • The magnetic structure factor of an Ampère phase is the complement of a Coulomb phase; in a pure paramagnet the two components add up to a constant.
  • Defects are vectorial current lines rather than scalar monopoles, so magnetization-curl sources replace monopole charges and relax through contractible and non-contractible pairs at different time scales.
  • A 2D square-lattice model with $J_1 = -J_3$ realizes the Ampère phase with the same thermodynamics as square ice (residual entropy near $0.22$ per site), so artificial spin systems can be calibrated against known square-ice behavior.
  • In the 3D pyrochlore case the Ampère phase fragments, adding emergent Bragg peaks on top of algebraic correlations; existing classifications of classical spin liquids should include this state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not pursue this, but artificial spin-ice arrays whose lattice geometry enforces a curl-free plaquette constraint could image the fictional current lines directly in real space, making the phase visible rather than inferred from scattering.
  • If the claim transfers to continuous-spin or quantum models, the Ampère phase should display a distinct gapless longitudinal excitation mode rather than the transverse 'photon' modes of Coulomb spin liquids; neutron or electron spin resonance spectra would distinguish them.
  • The paper's decomposition of the paramagnet into divergence-free and curl-free components suggests that a complete measurement of the correlation tensor in any constrained cooperative paramagnet could be analyzed by projecting onto the two complementary tensors, potentially revealing mixed phases in lattices where the two constraints cannot be mapped by rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a new class of algebraic spin liquids, the Ampère phase, in which the local constraint is a zero-curl condition on the coarse-grained magnetization field rather than the zero-divergence condition of Coulomb phases. Section III generalizes Henley's Gaussian coarse-graining argument to derive that curl-free constraints yield algebraic magnetic correlations with exponent equal to the space dimension d (Eq. 10). The authors then construct a 2D square-lattice Ising model whose low-energy manifold is curl-free and argue a one-to-one correspondence with the square-ice Coulomb phase, confirming identical thermodynamics by Monte Carlo. In 3D, they simulate a pyrochlore-lattice vertex model with a curl-free constraint using an all-in/all-out tetrahedron cluster dynamics, reporting complementary structure factors and spin correlations fitted to c + a/r^b with b = 3.018 ± 0.030, close to d = 3. The constant c is attributed to fragmentation. The paper frames the Ampère phase as a distinct algebraic spin liquid with vectorial topological excitations (fictional current lines) instead of magnetic monopoles.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the Ampère phase is a conceptually new class of algebraic spin liquid that complements the well-studied Coulomb phase and extends the analogy between frustrated magnets and magnetostatics. The analytic derivation in Section III is clean under its assumptions, and the Monte Carlo fits confirming b ≈ d in 3D provide nontrivial support. The paper also offers a concrete 2D realization and identifies a specific cluster dynamics appropriate for curl-free manifolds, which is a useful methodological contribution. However, the strength of the claim as stated in the abstract and Section III is not fully supported by the 3D data, which show a constant offset, and the derivation rests on an i.i.d./Gaussian ansatz that is validated only in the specific models studied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VI, Table I and abstract] The 3D Ampère-phase correlation fit is reported as C(r) = c + a/r^b with c = 0.0028 ± 0.0004, so the correlations do not decay to zero. The abstract and Section III claim that correlations 'decay in space with a power law whose exponent is the space dimension d'; as stated, this is not supported by the 3D data, where the algebraic term is a correction to a finite constant. The claim should be qualified (e.g., 'up to a constant fragmented component') or an argument should be provided that this constant is a separate topological sector term that does not affect the asymptotic decay exponent.
  2. [Section VI, cluster dynamics and sector averaging] The all-in/all-out tetrahedron cluster update conserves the number of all-in and all-out tetrahedra, as the authors themselves note. The simulations prepare micro-states and probe each 'sector' separately, but no average over sectors is performed and no evidence is given that the fitted exponent or the constant c is sector-independent. Since the constant contribution could be sector-specific, the universal d-exponent claim requires either an explicit sector average or a demonstration that c and b are identical across sectors.
  3. [Section III, Eqs. (2)-(4)] The analytic derivation relies on the assumption that the elementary bricks of the vector field are independent and identically distributed, so that the coarse-grained field F(r) obeys a centered Gaussian law. However, the curl-free constraint directly couples these variables, and the constraint is imposed after the Gaussian distribution is assumed. For generic frustrated magnets the constrained measure is not guaranteed to be Gaussian, so the universal exponent d in Eq. (10) is not proven beyond this ansatz. The Monte Carlo support in two specific models is encouraging, but the manuscript should either present the result as conditional on the Gaussian/CLT assumption or provide a justification of why the CLT applies inside the constrained manifold.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'curl-free contraint' should be 'curl-free constraint'.
  2. [Section III] Typographical errors: 'corse-grained' should be 'coarse-grained', and 'vector filed' should be 'vector field'.
  3. [Abstract and Section II] 'ad-algebraic spin liquid' should be 'a d-algebraic spin liquid'.
  4. [Section VI] In the sentence 'we first prepared a set of micro-states', the word 'micro-states' is fine, but later 'theses sectors' should be 'these sectors'.
  5. [Figure 3 and Section V] The thermodynamic comparison in 2D (specific heat, entropy, susceptibility) is presented without error bars or an estimate of statistical uncertainty; reporting independent runs and standard errors would strengthen the claim of exact equivalence.
  6. [Section IV and Figure 1] The vertex-to-plaquette mapping is described verbally; a more formal statement of the spin transformation (e.g., the explicit spin relabeling or the relation between vertex types) would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the d-exponent is derived from an explicit Gaussian/CLT ansatz plus the curl-free constraint, and the Monte Carlo verification uses free fit exponents rather than imposing d.

full rationale

The central prediction, that curl-free (Ampère) correlations decay as a power law with exponent equal to the space dimension d, is derived in Section III from two stated ingredients: (i) an i.i.d./central-limit assumption on the elementary degrees of freedom, giving a centered Gaussian coarse-grained field (Eq. 2), and (ii) the hard constraint curl F = 0, imposed in reciprocal space as q × F(q) = 0 (leading to Eq. 10). Neither ingredient is defined in terms of the target result, and no parameter of the final power law is fitted from the data before the comparison is made. The Monte Carlo support in Section VI fits correlation functions of the form C_n = a/r^b (Coulomb) and C_n = c + a/r^b (Ampère) with b as a free parameter, obtaining b ≈ 3.04 and b ≈ 3.02 respectively; the agreement with d = 3 is therefore a genuine check rather than a restatement of inputs. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that the unconstrained paramagnet decomposes into transverse and longitudinal algebraic components (Eq. 8), so the Ampère phase is presented as the constrained selection of the longitudinal sector, not as a relabeling of the full paramagnet. The self-citations ([16], [21], [30]-[35]) are contextual or concern previously established phenomena and are not load-bearing for the novel derivation. The sectored sampling limitation of the 3D curl-free manifold and the fitted constant c weaken the numerical support but do not make the analytic claim circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation relies on the Gaussian/central-limit ansatz for the coarse-grained field, a domain assumption inherited from Henley's Coulomb phase framework. The curl-free constraint is then imposed as a hard local condition. No free parameter fixes the exponent; the amplitude K is an overall scale only. The 3D fits (a,b,c) are verification metrics, not parameters used in the derivation.

free parameters (1)
  • K
    Overall amplitude in the Gaussian variance (sigma^2 = V/K); not numerically fitted, value irrelevant for the exponent.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Elementary bricks of the vector field (vertices or plaquettes) are independent and identically distributed random variables.
    Section III, second paragraph; enables the central limit theorem and Gaussian form of Eq. 2.
  • domain assumption The ground state manifold has constant energy E, so the free energy is entropy-driven.
    Section III, third paragraph; needed to write the free energy as the integral of an entropy density.
  • domain assumption Coarse-graining is uniform, so the variance scales as sigma^2 = V/K.
    Section III, paragraph after Eq. 2; connects microscopic brick statistics to the macroscopic field variance.
  • domain assumption The curl-free constraint is a hard local constraint on the coarse-grained field, equivalent to q x F(q) = 0 in reciprocal space.
    Section III, Eq. 10; this is the defining condition for the Ampère phase.
invented entities (2)
  • Ampère phase independent evidence
    purpose: Name for a spin liquid with a local curl-free constraint and algebraic correlations.
    Has falsifiable signatures: power-law exponent equal to space dimension, complementary structure factors, pinch points, and fragmentation behavior.
  • Fictional current lines / vectorial magnetic loops
    purpose: Topological defects in the Ampère phase, analogous to magnetic monopoles in the Coulomb phase.
    Emergent quasiparticles not yet directly observed; their predicted signatures (e.g. structure factor features) are testable but no external detection is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Amp\`ere phase in frustrated magnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HGG55JET

@misc{pith2026250108859,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Amp\`ere phase in frustrated magnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HGG55JET}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08859}
}
read the original abstract

We report a new class of algebraic spin liquids, in which the macroscopically degenerate ground state manifold is not Coulombic, like in spin ices, but Amp\`ere-like. The local constraint characterizing an Amp\`ere phase is not a Gauss law, but rather an Amp\`ere law, i.e., a condition on the curl of the magnetization vector field and not on its divergence. As a consequence, the excitations evolving in such a manifold are not magnetically charged scalar quasiparticles, the so-called magnetic monopoles in Coulomb phases, but instead vectorial magnetic loops (or fictional current lines). We demonstrate analytically that in a macroscopically degenerate manifold inheriting the properties of a cooperative paramagnet and subject to a local curl-free contraint, magnetic correlations decay in space with a power law whose exponent is the space dimension d: the Amp\`ere phase is a d-algebraic spin liquid. Using Monte Carlo simulations with appropriate cluster dynamics, we confirm this physics numerically in two- and three-dimensional examples, and illustrate how the Amp\`ere phase compares to its Coulomb counterpart.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08859 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Square lattice with Ising spins sitting on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Example of a spin configuration belonging to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    allows the investigation of a wealth of phenomena in solid state physics, through the concept of quasi- particles. For example, certain highly frustrated magnets, such as spin ice compounds [2–5], host excitations behaving as deconfined charged quasi- particles interacting via a Coulomb potential [6–11]. Emerging in a purely spin system, these pseudo- cha...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Rehn and R

    J. Rehn and R. Moessner, Maxwell electromag- netism as an emergent phenomenon in condensed matter, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A 374, 20160093 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical frus- tration in the ferromagnetic pyrochlore Ho 2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    M. J. P. Gingras, Introduction to frustrated mag- netism, (Solid State Science vol 164) ed C Lacroix, P Mendels and F Mila (Berlin: Springer) chapter (Spin Ice) (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    S. T. Bramwell, M. J. P. Gingras, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Spin ice (World Scientific, 2013) p. 383

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    D. M. Arroo and S. T. Bramwell, Experimental measures of topological sector fluctuations in the f- model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 214427 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    I. A. Ryzhkin, Magnetic relaxation in rare-earth oxide pyrochlores, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 101, 481 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Mag- netic monopoles in spin ice, Nature 451, 42 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Fennell, P

    T. Fennell, P. P. Deen, A. R. Wildes, K. Schmalzl, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, R. J. Aldus, D. F. McMorrow, and S. T. Bramwell, Magnetic coulomb phase in the spin ice Ho 2Ti2O7, Science 326, 415 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    L. D. C. Jaubert and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Signa- ture of magnetic monopole and dirac string dynam- ics in spin ice, Nat. Phys. 5, 258 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    L. D. C. Jaubert and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Magnetic monopole dynamics in spin ice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 164222 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Spin ice, fractionalization, and topological order, An. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 35 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    C. L. Henley, The ’Coulomb phase’ in frustrated systems, An. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 179 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    C. L. Henley, Power-law spin correlations in py- rochlore antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 71, 014424 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    We refer the reader to the work of Kristian Tyn Kai Chung and Michel J

    During the writing of the manuscript, a preprint ap- peared addressing some of the issue we address here. We refer the reader to the work of Kristian Tyn Kai Chung and Michel J. P. Gingras entitled 2-Form U(1) Spin Liquids: Classical Model and Quantum Aspects, arXiv:2310.17607...

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Never- theless, we emphasize that this is related to the nature of the degree of freedom, and not to the 7 space dimensionality

    Of course, when the dimensionality of the curl is re- duced, for instance for coplanar spins, the Coulomb and Amp` ere phases are locally equivalent. Never- theless, we emphasize that this is related to the nature of the degree of freedom, and not to the 7 space dimensionality...

  9. [17]

    Perrin, B

    Y. Perrin, B. Canals, and N. Rougemaille, Extensive degeneracy, coulomb phase and magnetic monopoles in artificial square ice, Nature 540, 410 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    E. H. Lieb, Residual entropy of square ice, Phys. Rev. 162, 162 (1967)

    1967

  11. [19]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Ther- mal quenches in spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 107201 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    M. E. Brooks-Bartlett, S. T. Banks, L. D. C. Jaubert, A. Harman-Clarke, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Magnetic-moment fragmentation and monopole crystallization, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011007 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    L. D. C. Jaubert, Monopole holes in a partially or- dered spin liquid, SPIN 5, 1540005 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Canals, I.-A

    B. Canals, I.-A. Chioar, V.-D. Nguyen, M. Hehn, D. Lacour, F. Montaigne, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes, B. Santos Burgos, and N. Rougemaille, Fragmentation of magnetism in artificial kagome dipolar spin ice, Nat. Commun. 7, 11446 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Petit, E

    S. Petit, E. Lhotel, B. Canals, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, H. Muttka, E. Ressouche, A. R. Wildes, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Observation of magnetic fragmentation in spin ice, Nat. Phys. 12, 746 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    J. A. M. Paddison, H. S. Ong, J. O. Hamp, P. Mukherjee, X. Bai, M. G. Tucker, N. P. Butch, C. Castelnovo, M. Mourigal, and S. E. Dut- ton, Emergent order in the kagome ising magnet dy3mg2sb3o14, Nat. Commun. 7, 13842 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Lhotel, L

    E. Lhotel, L. D. C. Jaubert, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Fragmentation in frustrated magnets: A review, J. Low Temp. Phys. 201, 710 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Benton, and R

    O. Benton, and R. Moessner, Topological route to new and unusual coulomb spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 107202 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Davier, and F

    N. Davier, and F. A. G´ omez Albarrac ´ ın, and H. D. Rosales, and P. Pujol, Combined approach to an- alyze and classify families of classical spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054408 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Yan, and O

    H. Yan, and O. Benton, and R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Typology and resulting landscape, Phys. Rev. B 110, L020402 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Yan, and O

    H. Yan, and O. Benton, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Moessner, Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Detailed formalism and suite of examples, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174421 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Lozano-G´ omez, O

    D. Lozano-G´ omez, O. Benton, M. J. P. Gingras, H. Yan, An Atlas of Classical Pyrochlore Spin Liquids, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03547

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. A. Garanin and B. Canals, Classical spin liquid: Exact solution for the infinite-component antiferro- magnetic model on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 59, 443 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Canals and D

    B. Canals and D. A. Garanin, Spin-liquid phase in the pyrochlore anti-ferromagnet, Can. J. Phys. 79, 1323 (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    Canals and D

    B. Canals and D. A. Garanin, Classical spin liq- uid properties of the infinite-component spin vector model on a fully frustrated two dimensional lattice, Euro. Phys. J. B 26, 439 (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    Robert, B

    J. Robert, B. Canals, V. Simonet, and R. Ballou, Propagation and ghosts in the classical kagome an- tiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 117207 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    Nisoli, R

    C. Nisoli, R. Moessner, and P. Schiffer, Colloquium: Artificial spin ice: Designing and imaging magnetic frustration, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1473 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Rougemaille and B

    N. Rougemaille and B. Canals, Cooperative mag- netic phenomena in artificial spin systems: spin liquids, coulomb phase and fragmentation of mag- netism, Euro. Phys. J. B 92, 62 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    S. H. Skjærvø, C. H. Marrows, R. L. Stamps, and L. J. Heyderman, Advances in artificial spin ice, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 13 (2020). 8

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.