Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Robin Green Function Estimates and a Model of Mammalian Lungs

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the Robin Green function in rough domains is comparable to the Dirichlet Green function at corkscrew points in the Dirichlet-like regime, and to the fundamental solution at the natural crossover scale, and that this…

desk verdict Strong, novel Robin Green function paper, but the Dirichlet-regime lemma (5.28) drops a factor that breaks the iteration; needs a fix before the main theorem is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13168 v1 pith:HGR3BZTN submitted 2025-07-17 math.AP math.CA

Guy David , Stefano Decio , Max Engelstein , Marcel Filoche , Svitlana Mayboroda , Marco Michetti This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.CA MSC 35J0835J2535J1592C35
keywords RobinboundaryvalueproblemGreenfunctionestimatesharmonicmeasurephasetransitionmammalianlungmodelone-sidedNTAdomainsMakaroventropyrough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves sharp two-sided estimates for the Robin Green function in rough domains, showing that the transition between Neumann-like and Dirichlet-like behavior is governed by the dimensionless index $I_Y(r)=a r^{2-n}\sigma(B(Y,r))$. When $a\sigma(\partial\Omega)\le \operatorname{diam}(\Omega)^{n-2}$, the Green function is essentially flat at scale $\rho=(a\sigma(\partial\Omega))^{1/(n-2)}$ and behaves like $|X-Y|^{2-n}$ below it; in the opposite regime it is comparable to the Dirichlet Green function evaluated at corkscrew points. The paper applies these estimates to a model of mammalian lungs and proves a phase transition in the total oxygen flow $F(a)$: the flow stays within fixed bounds for $a\ge \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$, then decays linearly with $a$ below that threshold, with an intermediate correction controlled by the Makarov 2-entropy of Dirichlet harmonic measure. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a rigorous explanation of why a large, rough lung surface buffers oxygen uptake against moderate reductions in membrane permeability.

What carries the argument

The engine is the dimensionless index $I_Y(r)=a r^{2-n}\sigma(\partial\Omega\cap B(Y,r))$, which marks whether a ball of radius $r$ around a boundary point sits in the Neumann-like regime ($I_Y\lesssim 1$) or the Dirichlet-like regime ($I_Y\gtrsim 1$). Under the one-sided NTA hypotheses (interior corkscrew points and interior Harnack chains) together with the mixed-dimension lower bound $\sigma(B(Q,r))\ge c_d(r/s)^d\sigma(B(Q,s))$ with $d>n-2$, this index decays with scale and allows boundary Harnack chains and corkscrew substitutions. The proof combines a Balance Lemma comparing the energy of a Robin solution across level sets, an iteration lemma that improves the Robin-to-Dirichlet ratio close to the boundary, and classical Dirichlet Green-function comparison at corkscrew points; for the lung model, pre-fractal homogeneity and a reverse Hölder estimate for harmonic measure on Lipschitz pieces convert the Green-function bounds into the entropy formula.

What would settle it

Compute $F(a)$ numerically for a fixed pre-fractal domain, for example a digitized acinar geometry, across values of $a$ straddling $\sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$: the theorem predicts a flat plateau above the threshold, linear decay below it, and an intermediate correction proportional to $r_a^{2-n}S(\omega_D^0,r_a,2)$; a simulation showing monotone decay with no plateau at the predicted threshold would refute the phase-transition claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for one-sided NTA pairs of mixed dimension, $G^a_R(X,Y)$ is comparable, with constants independent of $a$, to the Dirichlet Green function evaluated at corkscrew points when $a\sigma(\partial\Omega)\ge \operatorname{diam}(\Omega)^{n-2}$, and to $\rho^{2-n}$ or $|X-Y|^{2-n}$ according as $|X-Y|\ge\rho$ or $|X-Y|\le\rho$ when $a\sigma(\partial\Omega)\le \operatorname{diam}(\Omega)^{n-2}$, with $\rho=(a\sigma(\partial\Omega))^{1/(n-2)}$. Theorem 1.3 then proves the phase transition in total flow: $F(a)$ is bounded between constants for $a\ge \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$, and $F(a)\simeq a\sigma(\partial\Omega)$ for $a\le \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$. In the intermediate regime, the deficit from the maximal flow satisfies $F(\infty)-F(a)\simeq r_a^{2-n}S(\omega_D^0,r_a,2)$, where $S$ is the Makarov 2-entropy of the Dirichlet harmonic measure with pole at the origin. The paper also derives a boundary comparison principle, doubling and Bourgain-type estimates for Robin harmonic measure, and shows that if the Dirichlet harmonic measure lies in $A_\infty$, then the Robin harmonic measure lies in $A_\infty$ with constants independent of $a$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the domain is quantitatively accessible from the interior at every scale and that the boundary measure grows no slower than a $d$-dimensional law with $d>n-2$; if cusp-like traps or collapsing boundary measure violate these conditions, the index $I_Y(r)$ need not decay and the Green-function comparison can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For very rough boundaries, the Robin harmonic measure is comparable to an averaged Dirichlet harmonic measure at the scale where $I=1$, and when the Dirichlet harmonic measure is $A_\infty$, the Robin $A_\infty$ constants are independent of $a$.
  • For a lung with boundary surface measure $\sigma(\partial\Omega)$, the total oxygen flow is guaranteed to stay within a multiplicative constant of its maximal value as long as the local absorption rate satisfies $a\ge \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$.
  • When $a\le \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$, the total flow satisfies $F(a)\simeq a\sigma(\partial\Omega)$, so below the threshold oxygen uptake drops in direct proportion to the permeability.
  • As $a\to\infty$, the flow deficit $F(\infty)-F(a)$ decays like $1/a$ on locally Lipschitz patches, while in the intermediate range it is controlled by the Makarov 2-entropy of the Dirichlet harmonic measure.
  • The same Green-function machinery yields Bourgain, doubling, boundary comparison, and change-of-pole estimates for Robin harmonic measure, completing and sharpening the harmonic-measure theory initiated in the authors' previous paper.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The crossover scale $\rho$ can be read as a boundary-layer width: if the analogy with fluid and kinetic boundary layers is taken seriously, the same estimates may predict alveolar shapes that maximize the plateau width of oxygen flow for a given surface area.
  • Because the intermediate correction is expressed through the computable Makarov 2-entropy of Dirichlet harmonic measure, lung imaging data could in principle estimate $F(\infty)-F(a)$ without repeatedly solving the Robin problem.
  • The phase-transition result suggests a testable physiological prediction: a small uniform reduction in membrane permeability should produce almost no change in oxygen uptake, while a reduction crossing $a\approx \sigma(\partial\Omega)^{-1}$ should trigger a sharp drop in flow.
  • The authors leave $n=2$ and unbounded domains to future work; the same index-based mechanism suggests the phase transition persists there once an appropriate two-dimensional Green-function comparison is established.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the Green function for the Robin problem (1.1) in bounded one-sided NTA domains equipped with a doubling measure σ of mixed dimension d > n−2. Theorem 1.1 gives sharp two-sided estimates on G^a_R in three regimes: for aσ(∂Ω) ≤ diam(Ω)^{n−2} it is comparable to ρ^{2−n} away from the pole with ρ = (aσ(∂Ω))^{1/(n−2)}; for aσ(∂Ω) ≥ diam(Ω)^{n−2} it is comparable to the Dirichlet Green function, evaluated at corkscrew points when one point is near the boundary. Theorem 1.2 transfers A∞ constants from Dirichlet to Robin harmonic measure, and Theorem 1.3 proves the phase transition for the total flow F(a) conjectured in the lung-physics literature: F(a) is of order 1 for a ≥ σ(∂Ω)^{-1}, of order aσ(∂Ω) for a ≤ σ(∂Ω)^{-1}, with a Makarov-entropy correction in the intermediate regime.

Significance. If correct, these are substantial and novel results. The paper gives the first quantitative crossover between Dirichlet-like and Neumann-like behavior for Robin Green functions in rough domains, with constants independent of a and with an explicit length scale ρ; the lower bounds in (1.4) and (1.6) are new even for the Laplacian in smooth domains. The applications are also valuable: Theorem 1.2 resolves a uniformity question left open in [DDEMM24], and Theorem 1.3 gives a mathematically precise confirmation of the lung-flow phase transition, including the intermediate-scale entropy correction. A particular strength is that the main statements are derived, not fitted: the physics papers are used only as motivation, and the comparability constants are explicit in terms of the geometric data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.3, Eq. (5.26)] The exponential decay of ωξ(∂_k) is a load-bearing step: it is used in (5.27) and (5.39) to control the sums over layers, and hence to obtain the product convergence in (5.22)–(5.23). The proof given is only a sketch. In particular, the Bourgain estimate is applied to the thin layer Q_R = B(Q,9R/10)∩{τδ_0R ≤ dist(·,∂Ω) ≤ δ_0R}, and it is asserted that the lower bound θ is uniform in τ ≤ 1/2; this uniformity is not established, and the NTA constants of Q_R are not shown to be controlled independently of τ. Please provide a complete argument or a precise reference that covers this geometry.
  2. [Section 7, Eqs. (7.26)–(7.27)] The comparability G_D(A_i,0) ≃ r_a^{2-n}ω_D(B_i) is attributed to [HMT], which is listed as work in progress, together with [AHMT23] and [FP22]. This comparability is the bridge that converts the Green-function integral in (7.23) into the Makarov entropy in (7.27), and it is therefore essential to Theorem 1.3(5). The paper should state the exact theorem being used, verify that its hypotheses are satisfied by one-sided NTA pairs of mixed dimension with a non-Ahlfors doubling measure σ, or prove the needed comparability directly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Theorem 1.1, Eq. (1.6)] The upper bound in (1.6) is written as G_R^a(X,Y) ≤ G_D(A_X,A_Y) without a constant; Theorem 5.1 has the correct form G_R^a(X,Y) ≤ C G_D(A_X,A_Y). Please correct the statement in the introduction.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.1] In the proof of the lower estimate in (4.3), the text writes |X − Y|^{2−d}; the exponent should be 2−n, as in (4.4) and in the theorem statement.
  3. [Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 5.3, Eq. (5.28)] The displayed inequality (2.5) is typeset without explicit averaging symbols; as printed it appears to be an un-averaged L^2 bound. If Lemma 2.5 is intended as an averaged inequality, that is compatible with (5.28), but the notation should be made unambiguous, since otherwise (5.28) would require an additional factor σ(4B_y)/|4B_y∩Ω|.
  4. [Section 7, before Eq. (7.24)] The text contains the typo “Theorm 5.1”; it should be “Theorem 5.1”.
  5. [Lemma 6.2, scaling argument] The proof invokes [DDEMM24, Theorem 2.10] for the bound “||v||_{W^{1,2}(T)} ≤ C” but the stated constant is not scale-explicit. The scaling argument would be easier to verify if the quantitative dependence of that theorem on r and σ were stated.
  6. [Section 7, last paragraph before (7.28)] The text honestly notes that the authors “did not check any details except for the Laplacian.” Since Theorem 1.3 is stated for the Laplacian, please ensure the surrounding discussion in Section 1 does not suggest the full generality of Theorem 1.1 carries over to the lung-flow model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main estimates are derived, not fitted; self-citations to [DDEMM24] supply prior foundational lemmas without defining the target results in terms of themselves.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the central claims (Theorems 1.1 and 1.3) are obtained from the Robin formulation (2.8)-(2.9) via Caccioppoli estimates, the balance lemma, Poincaré inequalities, boundary Harnack chains, and an iteration of Lemma 5.3. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted: the crossover scale rho = (a sigma(dOmega))^(1/(n-2)) and the local index I_Y(r) = a r^(2-n) sigma(B(Y,r)) are dimensionless quantities that appear naturally in the equation, and the statements then prove the Neumann- or Dirichlet-like behavior rather than assuming it. The lung application likewise computes F(a) from the Green function and the flux identity (2.12); the physics papers [SFW02, FFS05] are cited only as motivation and numerical benchmarks, not as inputs. The one place where an entropy functional is named, (7.27), comes after an independent computation F(infinity) - F(a) approximately r_a^(2-n) sum omega_D(B_i)^2, and the paper explicitly warns that 'this is not precisely the entropy functional, but rather is comparable to it'; so this is honest labeling, not renaming a known result. The substantial use of the authors' earlier preprint [DDEMM24] (existence of the Robin Green function, boundary Harnack, Poincaré inequalities, corkscrew-largeness lemma, oscillation decay) is real and load-bearing in the sense that the proofs invoke those theorems, but it is a normal continuation of a research program and not a circular reduction: those results have their own assumptions and do not contain the present theorems as their conclusion. The reviewer-flagged possible missing factor in (5.28) would, if correct, be a substantive mathematical gap in the proof of Lemma 5.3, but it is a correctness concern, not an instance of an input being renamed as a prediction; under the hard rules it does not raise the circularity score. Overall, no equation of the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the central claims contain independent analytical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the geometric and measure-theoretic hypotheses of the paper plus standard elliptic PDE results; the only nonstandard input is the unpublished comparability [HMT] flagged in red_flags. No parameters are fitted to physiological or numerical data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Omega satisfies the interior corkscrew condition (C1) and interior Harnack chains (C2).
    Used throughout to build Harnack chains, tent domains, and croissants (Lemmas 2.1, 2.2) and to run the boundary Harnack principle; excludes cusps and exterior pathologies.
  • domain assumption sigma is a doubling measure supported on dOmega satisfying sigma(B(Q,r)) >= c_d (r/s)^d sigma(B(Q,s)) with d > n-2 (mixed dimension).
    Gives the dimensionless index I_Y(r) = a r^(2-n) sigma(B(Y,r)) and its decay at small scales; the whole Neumann-to-Dirichlet dichotomy rests on this bound.
  • domain assumption A is a measurable uniformly elliptic matrix; in the flow section the operator is the Laplacian.
    Ellipticity is used for Harnack, Caccioppoli, and maximum principles; the authors explicitly limit the flow theorem to the Laplacian and symmetric operators.
  • standard math Grueter-Widman [GW82] two-sided bounds for the Dirichlet Green function hold in the domains considered.
    Invoked for the Dirichlet regime and near the pole, for instance in Section 4 and around (5.12).
  • domain assumption Dahlberg's theorem and the comparability G_D(A_i,0) ~ r_a^(2-n) omega_D(B_i) hold in pre-fractal domains; the comparability is cited to [HMT] (work in progress), [AHMT23], and [FP22].
    Needed for the entropy formula (7.27) and the linear decay (7.28); the unpublished [HMT] is flagged as a gap in red_flags.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robin Green Function Estimates and a Model of Mammalian Lungs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HGR3BZTN

@misc{pith2026250713168,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robin Green Function Estimates and a Model of Mammalian Lungs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HGR3BZTN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13168}
}
read the original abstract

The present paper establishes delicate properties of the Green function with Robin boundary conditions, in particular, elucidating the nature of the passage between the Dirichlet-like and Neumann-like behavior. This yields sharp quantifiable bounds on the corresponding harmonic measure and proves the phase transition in the behavior of the total flow earlier conjectured in physics literature in concert with the efficacy of mammalian lungs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arendt and A.F.M

    W. Arendt and A.F.M. ter Elst, Gaussian estimates for second order elliptic operators with boundary conditions. J. Oper. Theory 38, No. 1, 87–130 (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Azzam, J

    J. Azzam, J. Garnett, M. Mourgoglou and X. Tolsa. Uniform Rectifiability, Elliptic Measure, Square Functions, and -Approximability Via an ACF Monotonicity Formula. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2023, No. 13, 10837-10941 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Aikawa and K

    H. Aikawa and K. Hirata Doubling conditions for harmonic measure in John domains. Ann. Inst. Fourier 58, No. 2, 429-445 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Akman, S

    M. Akman, S. Hofmann,J. M. Martell and T. Toro Square function and non-tangential maximal function estimates for elliptic operators in 1-sided NTA domains satisfying the capacity density condition. Adv. Calc. Var. 16, No. 3, 731-766 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Azzam, S

    J. Azzam, S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, M. Mourgoglou and X. Tolsa. Harmonic measure and quantitative connectivity: geometric characterization of the L^p -solvability of the Dirichlet problem. Invent. Math. 222, No. 3, 881-993 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Azzam, S

    J. Azzam, S. Hofmann, J. M. Martell, S. Mayboroda, M. Mourgoglou, X. Tolsa, and A. Volberg. Rectifiability of harmonic measure. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26, No. 3, 703-728 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Azzam, Dimension drop for harmonic measure on Ahlfors regular boundaries

    J. Azzam, Dimension drop for harmonic measure on Ahlfors regular boundaries. , Potential Anal. 53, No. 3, 1025-1041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Badger and A

    M. Badger and A. Genschaw. Lower bounds on Bourgain’s constant for harmonic measure. Can. J. Math. 76, No. 6, 1967-1986 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Badger, A

    M. Badger, A. Genschaw. Hausdorff dimension of caloric measure. To appear in Amer. J. Math

  2. [10]

    R. Bass, K. Burdzy and Z.-Q. Chen, On the Robin problem in fractal domains. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 96, No. 2, 273-311 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    Batakis, Harmonic measure of some Cantor type sets

    A. Batakis, Harmonic measure of some Cantor type sets. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Math. 21, No. 2, 255-270 (1996)

    1996

  4. [12]

    Choi and S

    J. Choi and S. Kim, Green's functions for elliptic and parabolic systems with Robin-type boundary conditions. J. Funct. Anal. 267, No. 9, 3205-3261 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    B.E.J Dahlberg, Estimates of harmonic measure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 65, 275–288 (1977)

    1977

  6. [14]

    Daners, Robin boundary value problems on arbitrary domains

    D. Daners, Robin boundary value problems on arbitrary domains. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 352, No. 9, 4207-4236 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    E. B. Davies, Heat Kernels and Spectral Theory. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989

    1989

  8. [16]

    De Silva and O

    D. De Silva and O. Savin, A short proof of boundary Harnack principle. J. Differ. Equations 269, No. 3, 2419-2429 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    David, S

    G. David, S. Decio, M. Engelstein, S. Mayboroda and M. Michetti. Dimension and structure of the Robin Harmonic Measure on Rough Domains . arXiv:2410.23914, preprint (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    David, J

    G. David, J. Feneuil and S. Mayboroda, Elliptic theory in domains with boundaries of mixed dimension. Ast \'e risque, 442, (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    David, C

    G. David, C. Jeznach and A. Julia, Cantor sets with absolutely continuous harmonic measure. J. Éc. Polytech., Math. 10, 1277-1298 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Essey and J

    M. Essey and J. Maina, Fractal analysis of concurrently prepared latex rubber casts of the bronchial and vascular systems of the human lung. Open Biol. 10, No. 7, (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals

    David, G.; Jerison, D. Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39 (1990), no. 3, 831–845

    1990

  14. [22]

    J Feneuil and L Li, Green function characterization of uniformly rectifiable sets of any codimension Adv. Math. 430, Article ID 109220, 45 p. (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Preprint 2024

    J Feneuil and L Li, The L^p Poisson-Neumann problem and its relation to the Neumann problem. Preprint 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Feneuil and B

    J. Feneuil and B. Poggi. Generalized Carleson Perturbations of Elliptic Operators . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 375, No. 11, 7553-7599 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Felici, M

    M. Felici, M. Filoche, B. Sapoval, Renormalized random walk study of the efficiency of the mammalian pulmonary acinus. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 6 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Gesztesy, M

    F. Gesztesy, M. Mitrea and R. Nichols, Heat kernel bounds for elliptic partial differential operators in divergence form with Robin-type boundary conditions. J. Anal. Math. 122, 229-287 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Gesztesy, M

    F. Gesztesy, M. Mitrea, R. Nichols and E. M. Ouhabaz Heat kernel bounds for elliptic partial differential operators in divergence form with Robin-type boundary conditions II. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143, No. 4, 1635-1649 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    D. S. Grebenkov, M. Filoche and B. Sapoval, Mathematical basis for a general theory of Laplacian transport towards irregular interfaces Physical review letter E 73, 021103 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    Gr\"uter and K.-O

    M. Gr\"uter and K.-O. Widman, The Green function for uniformly elliptic equations Manuscr. Math. 37, 303-342 (1982)

    1982

  22. [30]

    Hofmann, J

    S. Hofmann, J. M. Martell, and T. Toro, General divergence form elliptic operators on domains with adr boundaries, and on 1-sided nta domains. Work in progress

  23. [31]

    Hofmann, J

    S. Hofmann, J. M. Martell, S. Mayboroda, T. Toro, and Z. Zhao Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Geom. Funct. Anal. 31, No. 2, 325-401 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Hofmann and D

    S. Hofmann and D. Sparrius The Neumann function and the L^p Neumann problem in chord-arc domains Adv in Nonlinear Studies 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Lung structure and the intrinsic challenges of gas exchange

    CCW Hsia, DM Hyde and ER Weibel. Lung structure and the intrinsic challenges of gas exchange. Compr Physiol. 6, No. 2, 827–895 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Jerison and C.E

    D. Jerison and C.E. Kenig. Boundary behavior of harmonic functions in nontangentially accessible domains. Adv. Math. 46, 80-147 (1982)

    1982

  27. [35]

    C. E. Kenig, Harmonic analysis techniques for second order elliptic boundary value problems. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 83. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, R...

    1994

  28. [36]

    Kenig, T

    C. Kenig, T. Toro, On the free boundary regularity theorem of Alt and Caffarelli. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 10, No. 1-2, 397-422 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Kenig and T

    C. Kenig and T. Toro, Harmonic measure on locally flat domains. Duke Math. J. 87, No. 3, 509-551 (1997)

    1997

  30. [38]

    Lewis, A

    J. Lewis, A. Vogel, A symmetry theorem revisited. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 130, No. 2, 443-451 (2002)

    2002

  31. [39]

    G. Losa, D. Merlini, T. Nonnenmacher and E. Weibel, editors. Fractals in Biology and Medicine part of the series Mathematics and Bioscience in Interaction Published by Birkh\"auser Basel, 2006

    2006

  32. [40]

    N. G. Makarov, Fine structure of harmonic measure St. Petersbg. Math. J. 10, No. 2, 217-268 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    Mourgoglou, B

    M. Mourgoglou, B. Poggi and X. Tolsa. L^p -solvability of the Poisson-Dirichlet problem and its applications to the regularity problem. To appear in the Journal of the European Mathematical Society

  34. [42]

    Mourgoglou and X

    M. Mourgoglou and X. Tolsa, Solvability of the Neumann problem for elliptic equations in chord-arc domains with very big pieces of good superdomains. preprint, arXiv:2407.20385

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Sapoval, M

    B. Sapoval, M. Filoche and E.R. Weibel, Smaller is better-but not too small: a physical scale for the design of the mammalian pulmonary acinus Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16: 10411-10416 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.