Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 62 references

Ubiquitous Intelligence Via Wireless Network-Driven LLMs Evolution

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that LLMs can bypass the human-data bottleneck by learning directly from their environment through wireless networks, a stage it calls experience scaling.

desk verdict A well-written vision paper that recombines known edge-AI ideas under a new label; the central claim about 'experience scaling' is plausible but lacks any mechanism or evidence, so it works as a position piece, not a technical contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08400 v1 pith:HPJY3ADV submitted 2025-09-10 cs.NI

Xingkun Yin , Feiran You , Hongyang Du , Kaibin Huang This is my paper
classification cs.NI
keywords ubiquitousintelligenceexperiencescalingLLMevolutionwirelessnetworksedgeAIlifelonglearning6Gdistributedinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the dominant ways of making large language models smarter—pre-training on massive text, post-training on human feedback, and spending more compute at test time—are all hitting the same wall: human-produced data cannot grow fast enough to feed them. It proposes a fourth stage, called experience scaling, in which LLMs collect and create their own training signal by acting inside the real world, with wireless networks as the channel that gathers, routes, and synchronizes that experience. The result would be ubiquitous intelligence: models that keep improving continuously across edge devices and base stations instead of being frozen between centralized retraining rounds. The co-evolution cuts both ways—networks enable model growth, and models make networks semantically aware and self-organizing. The paper is a research agenda, not an experimental result, and it names communication load and model consistency as the open problems that will decide whether the vision holds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the co-evolution loop between the wireless network and the LLM, captured by the paper's term 'ubiquitous intelligence.' On one side, network mechanisms—device-to-device links, edge caching, spectrum-aware synchronization, and hierarchical orchestration across small cells, macro cells, and cloud—collect and propagate experience for lifelong learning. On the other side, LLM-driven semantic awareness lets the network exchange meaning rather than raw data and schedule resources by context. The loop is the scaling mechanism: experience flows in, refined models flow out, and the network's orchestration determines how much capability each environment can add.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison: take the same base LLM, fine-tune one copy only on human-curated data and another only on environmental experience gathered by the model itself over wireless links, with matched token counts and compute. If the experience-fed model does not match or beat the human-data model on held-out tasks, or if the communication overhead grows without corresponding capability gain, the central premise of experience scaling fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that LLM scaling has three recognized phases—pre-training, post-training, and test-time scaling—and that each depends on human-generated or human-annotated data, whose supply is running out. The paper's discovery is that a fourth phase is available in principle: let models interact directly with environments through wireless infrastructure, treat those interactions as experience, and feed that experience back into model refinement. This is 'experience scaling.' It turns the network from a pipe into a distributed learning organ: devices, base stations, and edge servers collect heterogeneous multimodal experience, share it with local and global models, and receive updated

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that experiences a model collects by acting in the environment, transmitted through wireless links, can serve as a substitute for human-generated data in making the model more capable—and that the traffic and synchronization this creates can be made tractable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LLM development could shift from discrete releases to continuous field updates, with refinements flowing over device-to-device and edge links between retraining rounds.
  • Wireless resource management—bandwidth, scheduling, spectrum—becomes a direct determinant of model improvement, not just a service-delivery constraint.
  • Personalization and privacy improve because experience is gathered and processed near users, reducing reliance on centralized cloud data collection.
  • Task offloading and distributed cached knowledge let heterogeneous devices share reasoning without full retraining, lowering latency for time-sensitive services.
  • The paradigm's own open challenges—scalable experience exchange and global model consistency—must be solved before the loop can operate at scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: if experience scaling is taken seriously, the scarce resource shifts from data tokens to communication bandwidth and experience quality, so network optimization should be framed as maximizing model capability gain per byte, a metric the paper does not define.
  • Extension: experience data will need filters or reward signals for novelty, diversity, and safety—parallel to the curation filters used for human text—otherwise uncontrolled environmental data could degrade models or amplify bias.
  • Extension: the cleanest near-term test is a controlled deployment where matched models are fine-tuned on wireless-collected experience versus human-curated data of equal size; if experience-trained models do not at least match, the scaling story loses its empirical basis.
  • Extension: the co-evolution logic transfers to other sensor-rich settings—robotics, smart cities, industrial IoT—where the same network-to-model loop could be evaluated with existing infrastructure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces "ubiquitous intelligence" as a co-evolutionary paradigm in which LLMs and wireless networks jointly improve: wireless networks provide distributed, low-latency, personalized support for lifelong LLM learning, while LLMs make the network context-aware and adaptive. The central proposal is "experience scaling" (§3.1, §4.1.1), the idea that LLMs can bypass the human-generated-data bottleneck by collecting and creating training data directly from environmental interactions routed through wireless networks. The paper describes network-side mechanisms (edge-cloud collaborative reasoning, D2D knowledge sharing, spectrum-aware adaptation), LLM-side mechanisms (adaptive offloading, context-aware scheduling, hierarchical orchestration), and a claim of energy benefits from edge redistribution (§4.3). It closes by listing open challenges. No mathematical model, experimental evaluation, or quantitative validation is provided.

Significance. If the central claims were established, experience scaling would be a substantial research direction for 6G edge intelligence and continuous learning. The paper is valuable as a position statement: it synthesizes ongoing trends in edge LLM deployment, clearly names the data bottleneck, and lists important open problems (experience exchange, consistency, representation). Its strengths are the coherent conceptual framework and the explicit challenge list. However, the paper currently asserts rather than demonstrates its key premises: that environmental experience can substitute for human-generated data, that scaling laws have reached a ceiling, and that edge redistribution reduces energy. The contribution is therefore a vision paper, not a technical result.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, §4.1.1] The load-bearing claim is that LLMs can "collect and create data directly from their environment" and use this experience to bypass the human-data bottleneck. The manuscript never specifies how raw environmental interaction becomes a training signal: no objective, tokenization, labeling, reward model, or curation mechanism is defined. Without this, "experience scaling" is an assertion, not a proposal. The paper's own Section 5 lists "scalable experience exchange" and "efficient knowledge representation" as unsolved, but those are downstream of the more basic question of whether experience data can improve capabilities at all. A revision should either propose a concrete mechanism (e.g., RL from environment feedback, self-improvement loops, synthetic-data generation) and cite evidence that such signals improve LLM capabilities, or explicitly reframe experience scaling as an unproven hypoth
  2. [§2.1, Fig. 1] The motivation depends on the empirical claims that current scaling laws exhibit "diminishing returns" and that "LLMs performance is nearing its ceiling under this paradigm." The only support offered is the vague statement that "GPT-4's greatly increased scale over GPT-3 yielded diminishing per-token gains," with no citation or metric. The standard scaling-law metric is loss versus compute, not "per-token gains," and the cited reference [25] reports power-law improvements rather than a ceiling. If this is a conjecture, it should be labeled as such; if it is an empirical claim, it needs data or references. This is load-bearing because the need for a new scaling paradigm rests on this premise.
  3. [§4.3] The energy benefit claim is unsupported and appears physically questionable as stated. The paper asserts that redistributing computation to network edges "harnesses wasted capacity and reduces carbon impact" without modeling the energy efficiency of edge devices, the communication and transmission energy required for distributed training/inference, or the embodied energy of additional infrastructure. The supporting citation [58] is a black-hole physics paper ("Hairy black holes in disformal scalar-tensor gravity theories"), which does not address microgrids or data-center energy. A revision should either present a first-order energy model with quantitative assumptions or temper this claim to a speculative research direction with appropriate references.
  4. [§3.3] The conceptual framework is partly self-referential: "ubiquitous intelligence" is defined as the co-evolution of LLMs and wireless networks, and the same co-evolution is then presented as the source of the claimed benefits. The four principles (Continuous Intelligence Ascension, System-Orchestrated Intelligence Adaption, Permeable Semantic Networking, Ubiquitous Coherence Communications) are stated as mechanisms rather than as design goals or conjectures. As a position paper this is acceptable if clearly framed as a research vision, but the text should distinguish definitions, assumptions, and open hypotheses. For example, "Continuous Intelligence Ascension" is not established by any evidence; it is a target property of the proposed framework.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1] Caption contains typos: "Experiece Scaling" should be "Experience Scaling", and "Compute Reource" should be "Compute Resource".
  2. [§2.2, §3.2, §4.2.2] Grammar issues: "cloud-based designs often ignores" should be "ignore"; "LLMs frameworks" should be "LLM frameworks"; "collective LLMs updates" should be "LLM updates".
  3. [§3.3] "Adaption" appears in headings and principles; standard technical English uses "Adaptation". If intentional, please note; otherwise correct for consistency.
  4. [Ref. [58]] Reference [58] is a physics paper on black holes and does not support the statement about microgrids with surplus generation. It should be replaced with a relevant energy-system or smart-grid reference, or removed.
  5. [§4.1.1] The term "experience" is never formally defined. Does it mean raw sensor streams, interaction histories, feedback/reward signals, or synthetic data? A precise definition is needed before discussing collection, exchange, and scaling.
  6. [§5] The "Efficient knowledge representation" bullet is vague; it should explain how heterogeneous multimodal experience is intended to be tokenized, aligned, or otherwise made usable for LLM training. Currently it restates the problem without proposing a direction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor definitional self-reference in 'continuous intelligence ascension'; no fitted-prediction or self-citation-load-bearing circularity.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.3 ('Continuous Intelligence Ascension' bullet) and Section 4.1.1 ('Experience Scaling')]
    "Continuous intelligence ascension denotes the sustained enhancement of LLMs capabilities through interaction with dynamic environments. ... System-wide gathering, processing, and leveraging such interactive experiences represent a critical direction supporting continuous intelligence ascension for the next evolutionary era of LLMs scaling."

    The paper's central argument for 'experience scaling' is that gathering interactive environmental data supports 'continuous intelligence ascension.' But that target term was defined in Section 3.3 as 'sustained enhancement of LLMs capabilities through interaction with dynamic environments.' The conclusion that environmental interaction improves LLMs is therefore already stipulated in the definition of the term used as evidence. The paper supplies no independent mechanism showing such experience data is tokenizable, learnable, or sufficient; Section 5 lists 'scalable experience exchange' and 'global model consistency' as unsolved. This is definitional, not equation-level, circularity: the claimed support is true by stipulation rather than by demonstration.

full rationale

This is a vision/position manuscript: it contains no fitted parameters, no numerical predictions, no equations, and no derivation from which a result is extracted. The only circular step I can exhibit is the definitional self-reference around 'continuous intelligence ascension' (Section 3.3 vs Section 4.1.1). There is a self-citation to Du et al. [6], but it is used only to describe cloud/edge AI infrastructure and is not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work, and no measured quantity is renamed as a prediction. Section 5 candidly lists open challenges (scalable experience exchange, global model consistency, efficient knowledge representation), which weakens the paper's substitution assumption but does not make the argument circular. The 'ubiquitous intelligence' label is stipulated, so calling the co-evolution framework 'ubiquitous intelligence' is partly naming rather than proof. Score 2 reflects this minor conceptual self-reference while recognizing the substantive survey-like content is otherwise independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on two conceptual inventions (experience scaling, ubiquitous intelligence) and several domain assumptions about wireless capability and edge-device resources. These are asserted as plausible directions rather than derived or demonstrated, which makes the vision inherently speculative.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Wireless networks can support system-orchestrated lifelong learning at scale.
    Sections 3.1 and 4.1 assume the network fabric can gather, route, and synchronize experiential data without breakdown; Section 5 lists unsolved scalability challenges.
  • domain assumption LLMs can improve from unstructured environmental experience without human-generated ground truth.
    Sections 3.1 and 4.1.1 postulate 'experience scaling' as a new scaling law, but no evidence or mechanism is provided.
  • domain assumption Edge devices have sufficient compute and energy to run inference and refinement.
    Sections 4.1.2 and 4.2.1 assume local LLM execution and offloading are practical, but no feasibility analysis is given.
  • domain assumption Co-evolution of LLMs and networks is stable and converges.
    Section 3.2 implies mutual reinforcement; Section 5 acknowledges global model consistency and intermittent connectivity as open challenges.
invented entities (2)
  • Experience scaling
    purpose: Proposed fourth scaling dimension for LLMs, based on collecting and learning from real-world experiences rather than human data.
    Introduced in Sections 2.1 and 4.1.1 as a conceptual extension of scaling laws; no measurable definition or prediction is given.
  • Ubiquitous intelligence
    purpose: Paradigm label for the co-evolution of wireless networks and LLMs.
    Defined in Section 3.3 as a set of principles; no falsifiable predictions attached.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ubiquitous Intelligence Via Wireless Network-Driven LLMs Evolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HPJY3ADV

@misc{pith2026250908400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ubiquitous Intelligence Via Wireless Network-Driven LLMs Evolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HPJY3ADV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08400}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce ubiquitous intelligence as a paradigm where Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve within wireless network-driven ecosystems. Unlike static model deployments, this approach enables scalable and continuous intelligence ascension through coordination between networks and LLMs. Wireless networks support system-orchestrated lifelong learning, while LLMs drive the next-generation network development that is more adaptive and responsive. This co-evolution highlights a shift toward self-improving systems, sustaining capability growth across diverse and resource-constrained environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08400 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scaling Laws: Scaling in terms of parameter size, training data, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Coevolution of Wireless Network and AI: Adaptive, continuously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ubiquitous Intelligence: LLMs evolve into adaptive, networked ecosystems integrated with wireless edge environments, enabling scal￾able, resilient, and continuously improving intelligent services. availability, optimizing both performance and utilization. This principle embodies effective coordination and adaptive deployment of intelligence within distributed environments. • Permeable Semantic Networking. AI empower… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between conventional cloud-centric approach and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [58]

    Hairy black holes in disformal scalar-tensor gravity theories,

    C. Erices, P . Filis, and E. Papantonopoulos, “Hairy black holes in disformal scalar-tensor gravity theories,”Physical Review D, vol. 104, no. 2, p. 024031, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [25]

    Scaling laws for neural language models,

    J. Kaplan, S. McCandlish, T. Henighan, T. B. Brown, B. Chess, R. Child, S. Gray, A. Radford, J. Wu, and D. Amodei, “Scaling laws for neural language models,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361

    arXiv 2020

  3. [1]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,”

  4. [2]

    Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,

    P . Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V . Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. K ¨uttler, M. Lewis, W. tau Yih, T. Rockt ¨aschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401

    arXiv 2021

  5. [3]

    The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey,

    Z. Xi, W. Chen, X. Guo, W. He, Y. Ding, B. Hong, M. Zhang, J. Wang, S. Jin, E. Zhou, R. Zheng, X. Fan, X. Wang, L. Xiong, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Jiang, Y. Zou, X. Liu, Z. Yin, S. Dou, R. Weng, W. Cheng, Q. Zhang, W. Qin, Y. Zheng, X. Qiu, X. Huang, and T. Gui, “The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey,” 2023. [Online]. Available...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [4]

    In- dustrial applications of large language models,

    M. Raza, Z. Jahangir, M. B. Riaz, M. J. Saeed, and M. A. Sattar, “In- dustrial applications of large language models,”Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 13755, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [5]

    Characterization of large language model development in the datacenter,

    Q. Hu, Z. Ye, Z. Wang, G. Wang, M. Zhang, Q. Chen, P . Sun, D. Lin, X. Wang, Y. Luo, Y. Wen, and T. Zhang, “Characterization of large language model development in the datacenter,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07648

    arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative ai in mobile networks: A survey of aigc services,

    M. Xu, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, Z. Han, A. Jamalipour, D. I. Kim, X. Shenet al., “Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative ai in mobile networks: A survey of aigc services,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1127–1170, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 62 references
  1. [7]

    A. G. S ´anchez,Azure OpenAI Service for Cloud Native Applications. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”, 2024

    2024

  2. [8]

    Alto,Building LLM Powered Applications: Create intelligent apps and agents with large language models

    V . Alto,Building LLM Powered Applications: Create intelligent apps and agents with large language models. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2024

    2024

  3. [9]

    Exploring deepseek: A survey on advances, applications, challenges and future directions,

    Z. Deng, W. Ma, Q.-L. Han, W. Zhou, X. Zhu, S. Wen, and Y. Xi- ang, “Exploring deepseek: A survey on advances, applications, challenges and future directions,”IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 872–893, 2025

    2025

  4. [10]

    Evaluating modern gpu interconnect: Pcie, nvlink, nv- sli, nvswitch and gpudirect,

    A. Li, S. L. Song, J. Chen, J. Li, X. Liu, N. R. Tallent, and K. J. Barker, “Evaluating modern gpu interconnect: Pcie, nvlink, nv- sli, nvswitch and gpudirect,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 94–110, 2019

    2019

  5. [11]

    Applications of distributed machine learning for the internet-of-things: A comprehensive survey,

    M. Le, T. Huynh-The, T. Do-Duy, T.-H. Vu, W.-J. Hwang, and Q.- V . Pham, “Applications of distributed machine learning for the internet-of-things: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Communica- tions Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  6. [12]

    Federated learning for en- hanced cybersecurity and trustworthiness in 5G and 6G networks: A comprehensive survey,

    A. Blika, S. Palmos, G. Doukas, V . Lamprou, S. Pelekis, M. Kon- toulis, C. Ntanos, and D. Askounis, “Federated learning for en- hanced cybersecurity and trustworthiness in 5G and 6G networks: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    2024

  7. [13]

    Advancing personalized federated learning: Integrative approaches with ai for enhanced privacy and customization,

    K. Cooper and M. Geller, “Advancing personalized federated learning: Integrative approaches with ai for enhanced privacy and customization,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2501.18174

    2025 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Beyond the cloud: Edge inference for generative large language models in wireless networks,

    X. Zhang, J. Nie, Y. Huang, G. Xie, Z. Xiong, J. Liu, D. Niyato, and X. S. Shen, “Beyond the cloud: Edge inference for generative large language models in wireless networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024

    2024

  9. [15]

    Memory-aware and context- aware multi-DNN inference on the edge,

    B. Cox, R. Birke, and L. Y. Chen, “Memory-aware and context- aware multi-DNN inference on the edge,”Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 83, p. 101594, 2022

    2022

  10. [16]

    Distributed ma- chine learning for wireless communication networks: Techniques, architectures, and applications,

    S. Hu, X. Chen, W. Ni, E. Hossain, and X. Wang, “Distributed ma- chine learning for wireless communication networks: Techniques, architectures, and applications,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1458–1493, 2021

    2021

  11. [17]

    Generative ai for the optimiza- tion of next-generation wireless networks: Basics, state-of-the-art, and open challenges,

    F. Khoramnejad and E. Hossain, “Generative ai for the optimiza- tion of next-generation wireless networks: Basics, state-of-the-art, and open challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  12. [18]

    Inte- grating iot and 6 g: Applications of edge intelligence, challenges, and future directions,

    Q. He, J. Lin, H. Fang, X. Wang, M. Huang, X. Yi, and K. Yu, “Inte- grating iot and 6 g: Applications of edge intelligence, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    2025

  13. [19]

    Edgeshard: Efficient llm inference via collaborative edge computing,

    M. Zhang, J. Cao, X. Shen, and Z. Cui, “Edgeshard: Efficient llm inference via collaborative edge computing,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14371

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Large language models for wireless communications: From adaptation to autonomy,

    L. Liang, H. Ye, Y. Sheng, O. Wang, J. Wang, S. Jin, and G. Y. Li, “Large language models for wireless communications: From adaptation to autonomy,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21524

    2025

  15. [21]

    Inte- grated sensing-communication-computation for edge artificial in- telligence,

    D. Wen, X. Li, Y. Zhou, Y. Shi, S. Wu, and C. Jiang, “Inte- grated sensing-communication-computation for edge artificial in- telligence,”IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 14– 20, 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design 7 and resource management,

    W. Wu, M. Li, K. Qu, C. Zhou, X. Shen, W. Zhuang, X. Li, and W. Shi, “Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design 7 and resource management,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1051–1066, 2023

    2023

  17. [23]

    Collaborative authentication for 6G networks: An edge intelligence based au- tonomous approach,

    H. Fang, Z. Xiao, X. Wang, L. Xu, and L. Hanzo, “Collaborative authentication for 6G networks: An edge intelligence based au- tonomous approach,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 2091–2103, 2023

  18. [24]

    What should 6g be?

    S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, and M.-S. Alouini, “What should 6g be?”Nature Electronics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020

    2020

  19. [26]

    Language models are few-shot learners,

    T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P . Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P . Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B...

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    P2 law: Scaling law for post-training after model pruning,

    X. Chen, Y. Hu, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Li, H. Chen, and J. Zhang, “P2 law: Scaling law for post-training after model pruning,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10272

    2025 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,

    L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. L. Wainwright, P . Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, J. Schulman, J. Hilton, F. Kelton, L. Miller, M. Simens, A. Askell, P . Welinder, P . Christiano, J. Leike, and R. Lowe, “Training language models to follow instructi...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    A survey on test-time scaling in large language models: What, how, where, and how well?

    Q. Zhang, F. Lyu, Z. Sun, L. Wang, W. Zhang, W. Hua, H. Wu, Z. Guo, Y. Wang, N. Muennighoff, I. King, X. Liu, and C. Ma, “A survey on test-time scaling in large language models: What, how, where, and how well?” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24235

    2025 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Sabourin,Strategic Adoption of 5G Technology: New Applications and Services: New Applications and Services

    V . Sabourin,Strategic Adoption of 5G Technology: New Applications and Services: New Applications and Services. IGI Global, 2025

    2025

  25. [32]

    A. K. Vyas, N. Khatri, and S. K. Jha,6G Communication network: architecture, security and applications. CRC Press, 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Guest editorial: sustainable big ai model for wireless networks,

    Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, Y. C. Eldar, D. T. Hoang, W. Tong, and K.- K. Wong, “Guest editorial: sustainable big ai model for wireless networks,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 18–19, 2024

    2024

  27. [34]

    Edge computing in the internet of things: A 6G perspective,

    M. Ishtiaq, N. Saeed, and M. A. Khan, “Edge computing in the internet of things: A 6G perspective,”IT Professional, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 62–70, 2024

    2024

  28. [35]

    Federated reinforcement learning- based resource allocation in D2D-enabled 6G,

    Q. Guo, F. Tang, and N. Kato, “Federated reinforcement learning- based resource allocation in D2D-enabled 6G,”IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 89–95, 2023

    2023

  29. [36]

    Online learning algorithms for context- aware video caching in D2D edge networks,

    Q. Xia, Z. Jiao, and Z. Xu, “Online learning algorithms for context- aware video caching in D2D edge networks,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2024

    2024

  30. [37]

    A review of 6g and ai convergence: Enhancing communica- tion networks with artificial intelligence,

    Y. Sanjalawe, S. Fraihat, M. Abualhaj, S. Makhadmeh, E. Alzubi et al., “A review of 6g and ai convergence: Enhancing communica- tion networks with artificial intelligence,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2025

    2025

  31. [38]

    Panda,Scalable Artificial Intelligence Systems: Cloud-Native, Edge- AI, MLOps, and Governance for Real-World Deployment

    S. Panda,Scalable Artificial Intelligence Systems: Cloud-Native, Edge- AI, MLOps, and Governance for Real-World Deployment. Deep Science Publishing, 2025

    2025

  32. [39]

    Artificial intelligence as a service (aiaas) for cloud, fog and the edge: State-of-the-art practices,

    N. Syed, A. Anwar, Z. Baig, and S. Zeadally, “Artificial intelligence as a service (aiaas) for cloud, fog and the edge: State-of-the-art practices,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1–36, 2025

    2025

  33. [40]

    A comprehensive survey of machine learning applied to resource allocation in wireless communica- tions,

    D. G. S. Pivoto, F. A. de Figueiredo, C. Cavdar, G. R. de Lima Teje- rina, and L. L. Mendes, “A comprehensive survey of machine learning applied to resource allocation in wireless communica- tions,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  34. [41]

    When large language model agents meet 6g networks: Perception, grounding, and alignment,

    M. Xu, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, Z. Han, D. I. Kim, and K. B. Letaief, “When large language model agents meet 6g networks: Perception, grounding, and alignment,”IEEE Wireless Communications, 2024

    2024

  35. [42]

    Maintenance operations on cloud, edge, and iot environments: taxonomy, survey, and research challenges,

    P . Souza, T. Ferreto, and R. Calheiros, “Maintenance operations on cloud, edge, and iot environments: taxonomy, survey, and research challenges,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1–38, 2024

    2024

  36. [43]

    Understanding 5g performance on heterogeneous computing architectures,

    C. Wang, H. Nie, W. Wang, J. Guo, P . Zhang, Y. Chen, S. Zhu, Y. He, and C. Xu, “Understanding 5g performance on heterogeneous computing architectures,”IEEE Communications Magazine, 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    A survey on large language models for communication, network, and service management: Application insights, challenges, and future directions,

    G. O. Boateng, H. Sami, A. Alagha, H. Elmekki, A. Hammoud, R. Mizouni, A. Mourad, H. Otrok, J. Bentahar, S. Muhaidatet al., “A survey on large language models for communication, network, and service management: Application insights, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Comm...

    2025

  38. [45]

    Towards edge general intelligence via large language models: Opportunities and challenges,

    H. Chen, W. Deng, S. Yang, J. Xu, Z. Jiang, E. C. Ngai, J. Liu, and X. Liu, “Towards edge general intelligence via large language models: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Network, 2025

    2025

  39. [46]

    Will we run out of data? limits of llm scaling based on human-generated data,

    P . Villalobos, A. Ho, J. Sevilla, T. Besiroglu, L. Heim, and M. Hobbhahn, “Will we run out of data? limits of llm scaling based on human-generated data,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04325

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    The role of mobile communications for industrial automation: Architecture, applications and challenges,

    E. Zeydan, S. S. Arslan, Y. Turk, T. Hewa, and M. Liyanage, “The role of mobile communications for industrial automation: Architecture, applications and challenges,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2025

    2025

  41. [48]

    Open RAN for 6G networks: Architecture, use cases and open issues,

    B. Agarwal, R. Irmer, D. Lister, and G.-M. Muntean, “Open RAN for 6G networks: Architecture, use cases and open issues,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  42. [49]

    Ioannou, P

    I. Ioannou, P . Nagaradjane, V . Vassiliou, A. Pitsillides, and C. Christophorou,Distributed Artificial Intelligence for 5G/6G Com- munications: Frameworks with Machine Learning. CRC Press, 2024

    2024

  43. [50]

    Network slicing- based learning techniques for iov in 5g and beyond networks,

    W. Hamdi, C. Ksouri, H. Bulut, and M. Mosbah, “Network slicing- based learning techniques for iov in 5g and beyond networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1989– 2047, 2024

    1989

  44. [51]

    Cachegen: Kv cache compression and streaming for fast large language model serving,

    Y. Liu, H. Li, Y. Cheng, S. Ray, Y. Huang, Q. Zhang, K. Du, J. Yao, S. Lu, G. Ananthanarayanan, M. Maire, H. Hoffmann, A. Holtzman, and J. Jiang, “Cachegen: Kv cache compression and streaming for fast large language model serving,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/...

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Dt-aided resource management in spectrum sharing integrated satellite-terrestrial networks,

    H. Nguyen-Kha, V . N. Ha, T. T. Nguyen, E. Lagunas, S. Chatzinotas, and J. Grotz, “Dt-aided resource management in spectrum sharing integrated satellite-terrestrial networks,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20789

    2025 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Dynamic task offloading and resource allocation for ultra-reliable low-latency edge computing,

    C.-F. Liu, M. Bennis, M. Debbah, and H. V . Poor, “Dynamic task offloading and resource allocation for ultra-reliable low-latency edge computing,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4132–4150, 2019

    2019

  47. [54]

    Context-aware status updating: Wireless scheduling for maximizing situational awareness in safety-critical systems,

    T. Z. Ornee, M. K. C. Shisher, C. Kam, and Y. Sun, “Context-aware status updating: Wireless scheduling for maximizing situational awareness in safety-critical systems,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06224

    2023 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Hierarchical split federated learning: Convergence analysis and system optimization,

    Z. Lin, W. Wei, Z. Chen, C.-T. Lam, X. Chen, Y. Gao, and J. Luo, “Hierarchical split federated learning: Convergence analysis and system optimization,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07197

    2025 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Environmental burden of united states data centers in the artificial intelligence era,

    G. Guidi, F. Dominici, J. Gilmour, K. Butler, E. Bell, S. Delaney, and F. J. Bargagli-Stoffi, “Environmental burden of united states data centers in the artificial intelligence era,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09786

    2024 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Announcing The Stargate Project,

    OpenAI, “Announcing The Stargate Project,” https://openai. com/index/announcing-the-stargate-project/, 2025, official Ope- nAI announcement of the Stargate Project

    2025

  51. [59]

    Leveraging energy storage to optimize data center electricity cost in emerging power markets,

    Y. Shi, B. Xu, B. Zhang, and D. Wang, “Leveraging energy storage to optimize data center electricity cost in emerging power markets,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/1606.01536

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Decentralized learning over wireless networks: The effect of broadcast with random access,

    Z. Chen, M. Dahl, and E. G. Larsson, “Decentralized learning over wireless networks: The effect of broadcast with random access,”

  53. [62]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07368

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07368

    arXiv

  54. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.