Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 130 references

Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A physics-informed U-Net evolves and super-resolves fuzzy dark matter fields by enforcing Schrödinger–Poisson dynamics, matching full simulations from sparse training data.

desk verdict Useful first full-SP FDM generative SR plus a data-efficient evolution U-Net, but the physics loss only regularizes thin a-windows in a 1 h⁻¹ Mpc box—abstract generalization language outruns Appendix B. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28604 v1 pith:HRZ4GEC2 submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.CO

Ashutosh Kumar Mishra , Emma Tolley , Nicolas Cerardi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords fuzzydarkmatterSchrödinger–Poissonphysics-informedneuralnetworksgenerativeU-Netsuper-resolutioncosmologicalsimulationswave
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fuzzy dark matter is expensive to simulate because the wave equation must be resolved everywhere, so boxes stay small and high-resolution runs are scarce. This paper shows that a generative U-Net can do two jobs at once—evolve fields from initial conditions to a later scale factor, and super-resolve low-resolution cubes—if training adds an explicit loss that penalizes violations of the Schrödinger–Poisson equations. With that physics loss, the evolution model matches target 1 h⁻¹ Mpc simulations using only about 20 percent of the temporal snapshots and still generalizes to new initial conditions. For super-resolution, the same idea yields the first generative models trained on full Schrödinger–Poisson fuzzy-dark-matter runs, recovering missing small-scale power while cutting the usual generative artifacts. The practical claim is that modern generative modeling can stay faithful to wave dark-matter physics and therefore reduce both storage and compute for the simulations cosmologists need.

What carries the argument

Cosmo-SPINN: a residual U-Net that outputs the real and imaginary parts of the wavefunction plus the gravitational potential, trained on the sum of a data MSE and a weighted physics loss built from Schrödinger–Poisson residuals (or a linearized kick–drift–kick step).

What would settle it

Train the same architecture with and without the physics loss on a held-out set of full Schrödinger–Poisson runs at a later redshift or larger box; if the physics-informed model no longer recovers the target power spectrum to within ~20 percent up to the Jeans scale, or if phase errors grow without bound, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Including an explicit Schrödinger–Poisson residual (or a first-order kick–drift–kick consistency) loss inside a generative U-Net substantially improves both the evolution and the super-resolution of fuzzy-dark-matter fields relative to data-only training, so that a 1 h⁻¹ Mpc box can be reproduced accurately from only ~20 percent of the temporal snapshots and, for the first time, generative super-resolution can be trained directly on full Schrödinger–Poisson simulations.

Load-bearing premise

That residual physics losses evaluated only on narrow windows of scale factor, together with ordinary field matching, are enough to fix the wavefunction phase and make the method work beyond the small boxes and short intervals used in the tests.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dense intermediate snapshots of fuzzy-dark-matter simulations need not be stored once an evolution emulator is trained.
  • Low-resolution Schrödinger–Poisson runs can be upscaled to high resolution while remaining consistent with the governing equations.
  • Physics-informed generative models become a practical route to larger-volume or longer-time fuzzy-dark-matter statistics that pure spectral solvers cannot yet reach.
  • Comparing residual versus kick–drift–kick physics losses gives a concrete design choice for future wave-dark-matter emulators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same residual-plus-physics pattern should transfer to mixed cold-plus-fuzzy dark-matter models where only a fraction of the matter is ultralight.
  • Autoregressive or neural-operator versions of the same loss could remove the need for any high-resolution supervised targets, provided phase degeneracy is controlled.
  • If the method scales, observational forecasts that currently rely on a handful of expensive fuzzy-dark-matter boxes can be rerun with large ensembles of emulated realizations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Cosmo-SPINN, a U-Net generative framework with a Schrödinger–Poisson (SP) physics-informed loss for fuzzy dark matter in a 1 h⁻¹ Mpc box. It addresses (i) mapping initial conditions at z=127 to fields near a target scale factor and (ii) 32³→128³ super-resolution at fixed epoch. Physics losses are either SP PDE residuals (Eqs. 37–40) or a first-order kick–drift–kick residual (Eqs. 41–42), combined with MSE on normalized (R,I,V). For evolution, adding the SP loss after a data-only warm-up improves residuals and data fidelity when only ~20% of snapshots in a∈[0.149,0.157] are labeled. For SR, models trained on full-SP Jaxion simulations recover power spectra to ~100 h Mpc⁻¹ with mean fractional errors typically ≲20% on held-out realizations, with SP vs KDK ablations and data-only baselines reported.

Significance. If the claims hold in the demonstrated regime, this is a useful step for FDM emulation: full-SP-trained generative SR is new relative to prior FDM GANs that did not use full quantum-pressure simulations, and the evolution results show clear data-efficiency gains from an explicit SP residual versus data-only training (Figs. 2–3, 5–7). Public PyTorch code and systematic SP/KDK ablations with power-spectrum scatter are strengths. The work is relevant to Epoch-of-Reionization-scale FDM studies where SP simulations are expensive. Significance is currently limited by the narrow scale-factor windows, small box, and incomplete phase/small-scale transfer across realizations, so the path to large-volume emulators remains prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §3.2–3.3; Eqs. (37)–(45); Appendix A] Abstract and §1/§6 claim evolution “to an arbitrary cosmological scale factor” and effective generalization across unseen ICs. Training and physics losses are confined to a∈[0.149,0.157] (evolution) and a∈[0.0798,0.0803] (SR) (§3.2; Eqs. 37–41). The evolution map is a residual from z=127 ICs to fields inside that thin window (Eq. 45), with SP/KDK residuals formed only at a and a+Δa drawn from the same window—not along the IC→target path. Appendix A already shows degraded power-spectrum error at interval edges. Please revise abstract/conclusion language to the demonstrated Δa≲0.01 regime, or add experiments that sample physics residuals and targets over a substantially broader a range.
  2. [Abstract; Appendix B; Fig. 9] Appendix B states that multi-realization evolution recovers large-scale morphology but fails on high-k modes, and that “the physics-informed loss alone admits multiple solutions that satisfy the governing equations but differ in phase.” This undercuts the Abstract claim that the framework “generalizes effectively across previously unseen realizations.” The single-realization 20%-snapshot result (Fig. 4) should not be conflated with cross-IC generalization. Either qualify the generalization claim to large-scale morphology only, or strengthen phase constraints (e.g., explicit phase/velocity losses, denser temporal supervision) and report quantitative high-k metrics for multi-IC evolution comparable to Fig. 7.
  3. [§4.2.2; Figs. 5–7; §6] For SR, ensemble statistics (Fig. 7) show the SP-residual model has larger high-k bias and realization scatter than KDK, while selected examples (Figs. 5–6) favor SP at high-k. §4.2.2 and §6 still lean toward SP as improving small-scale fidelity. Please reconcile example-level vs ensemble conclusions explicitly (e.g., preferred loss by metric and k-range), and state which checkpoint/selection rule (min physics test loss) is recommended for downstream use so the central SR claim is not overstated.
  4. [§5.1; §3.1] §5.1 acknowledges that particle-based 2LPT/CIC ICs are suboptimal for field-based FDM (mesh error; CDM-suited velocities) yet all results use this setup. Given that phase learning is already identified as the weak point (Appendix B), the IC choice is load-bearing for claimed physical consistency. At minimum, quantify sensitivity (e.g., one comparison with field-consistent ICs as in Luu et al. 2025) or clearly limit claims to “standard particle-initialized SP suites” rather than general FDM dynamics.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1–2.2] Equation numbering is inconsistent or duplicated in places (e.g., Poisson/mean density and timestep constraints reuse numbers such as (16), (34) in §2). Please renumber uniquely through the manuscript.
  2. [§4.1; Fig. 2] Fig. 2 caption and §4.1 refer to a∈[0.0798,0.0803] when discussing the evolution model’s snapshot count; evolution training is a∈[0.149,0.157] (§3.2). Correct the interval in the evolution discussion.
  3. [Title; §2] Title and running text alternate “F uzzy” / “Schr¨ odinger” spacing artifacts from LaTeX; clean typography throughout.
  4. [§3.4; §4.2] State explicitly whether test realizations in Figs. 5–6 are drawn from the 20% held-out IC set and whether any hyperparameter (α_max, λ_w, residual scale 0.1) was tuned on test data.
  5. [§1] Cite and briefly contrast related physics-informed or operator-learning cosmology emulators beyond the FDM GAN of Sipp et al. (2023) to clarify novelty boundaries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: physics loss is residual regularization against independent Jaxion targets, not a self-defining prediction.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing chain is: (i) standard SP/KDK dynamics as known PDEs; (ii) independent pseudo-spectral ground truth from Jaxion; (iii) a U-Net trained with MSE to those targets plus residual (or linearized KDK) penalties on network outputs; (iv) evaluation on held-out scale factors or realizations, with an explicit data-only baseline. The physics term L_physics = ⟨R_R²+R_I²+R_V²⟩ or ∥ψ_θ(a+Δa)−F_Δa[ψ_θ(a)]∥² enforces consistency of the generator with the governing equations; it does not define the predicted fields as equal to the training labels by construction, nor is any cosmological parameter fitted and then rediscovered as a ‘prediction.’ Self-citation to SPINN (Mishra & Tolley 2025) is methodological background that PINNs can handle SP collapse, not a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the reported spectra or the 20%-data claim. Narrow a-windows, phase degeneracy (Appendix B), and limited transfer are scope/correctness issues, not circular reductions. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external simulation benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The work sits on standard SP cosmology plus ordinary deep-learning inductive biases. Load-bearing choices are the small-box full-SP training distribution, particle-based ICs, hand-set loss weights/schedules, and the claim that PDE/KDK residuals plus MSE on (R,I,V) adequately regularize generative maps. No new physical entity is postulated; free parameters are training knobs and fixed simulation settings, not cosmological inferences.

free parameters (5)
  • physics loss ramp α_max and N_ramp (evolution) = α_max=0.02, N_ramp=1000
    α_max=0.02 over 1000 epochs is chosen empirically so SP loss does not overwhelm data fidelity; larger values hurt training reconstruction (§4.1).
  • adaptive gradient-balance weight λ_w = adaptive (equal gradient magnitudes)
    Set so data and physics losses contribute equally in gradient space; not derived from first principles (§3.3).
  • evolution residual scale factor 0.1 = 0.1 (then 1.0 in multi-realization)
    Output formed as ψ(a0)+0.1δ in single-realization evolution; later removed for multi-realization runs after empirical excess power (§3.4, App. B).
  • FDM particle mass and box cosmology = m=2.5e-22 eV, L=1 h^{-1} Mpc
    Fixed simulation settings defining the training distribution (m=2.5×10^{-22} eV, L=1 h^{-1} Mpc, Ωm=0.27, etc.), not inferred by the network (§3.1–3.2).
  • U-Net width/depth, Fourier feature K=8, c=64, Adam lr=1e-4, epoch budgets = K=8, c=64, lr=1e-4; evo 250+2750 ep; SR 20+60 ep
    Standard architecture/optimization hyperparameters that control capacity and convergence; results depend on these choices (§3.4).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic fuzzy dark matter in an expanding FLRW background is governed by the Schrödinger–Poisson system (Eqs. 4–6 / 31–33).
    Entire physics loss and simulation suite assume this classical-field SP description.
  • domain assumption Second-order unitary split-step pseudo-spectral KDK integration of SP provides trustworthy ground-truth targets when timesteps satisfy the stated CFL-like bounds.
    Supervised labels and KDK physics loss both inherit accuracy limits of Jaxion’s scheme (§2.2).
  • domain assumption Particle 2LPT + CIC density and velocity-derived phase are acceptable FDM initial conditions for evaluating the ML method.
    Authors note this is conventional but not ideal for field-based FDM; still used for all results (§3.1, §5.1).
  • ad hoc to paper MSE on normalized (R,I,V) plus SP residual or first-order KDK residual is a sufficient training objective for physically consistent generative maps (no explicit mass, phase, or BC losses).
    Stated that mass conservation and periodic BCs are expected to emerge when optimized (§3.3); Appendix B shows phase degeneracy remains.
  • standard math Standard facts of multivariable calculus, FFTs for spectral derivatives, and backprop through the U-Net.
    Used for residual assembly and optimization; not controversial.
invented entities (1)
  • Cosmo-SPINN (physics-informed generative U-Net framework)
    purpose: Name the combined evolution and super-resolution architecture with SP/KDK losses for FDM cubes.
    Methodological construct, not a new physical object; independent evidence is empirical performance on held-out sims, not an external detection channel.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRZ4GEC2

@misc{pith2026260728604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRZ4GEC2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28604}
}
abstract

Generative machine learning models have recently emerged as powerful tools for producing cosmological simulations. However, many existing emulators do not explicitly enforce the underlying physical dynamics governing cosmological evolution, often leading to artifacts and poor adherence to the evolution equations. In this work, we present a physics-informed generative U-Net framework for fuzzy dark matter (FDM) that addresses two complementary tasks: (i) the evolution of cosmological fields from initial conditions to an arbitrary cosmological scale factor and (ii) the super-resolution of FDM simulations at a specified cosmological scale factor. Our model incorporates a physics-informed loss function that explicitly enforces consistency with the underlying Schr\"odinger-Poisson (SP) dynamics during training. For the evolution task, we find that the inclusion of this physics-based loss significantly improves the quality of the predicted simulations, even when only a small amount of training data is available. Using only 20% of the training data, the model accurately reproduces the target simulations in a 1 $h^{-1}$ Mpc box. Furthermore, the framework generalizes effectively across previously unseen realizations of the initial conditions. For the super-resolution task, we present, for the first time, a generative super-resolution model trained on FDM simulations obtained by solving the full SP equations, considering both single and multiple realizations of the initial conditions and analyzing the role of the physics-informed loss in each case. Our approach enables modern generative modeling of cosmological simulations while maintaining physical consistency and substantially reducing generative artifacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the Cosmo-SPINN framework applied to two tasks: (a) (left) Evolution Model, which predicts R,I,V (Re(Ψ) = R,Im(Ψ) = I) at a target scale factor a from the initial conditions, and (b) (right) Super-Resolution Model, which reconstructs high-resolution fields from low-resolution inputs at the same scale factor. In both cases, the outputs serve as approximate solutions to the SP system and are constrained t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Training and test data losses (left) and normalized SP loss (right) for the evolution model. Training is performed using only the data loss for the first 250 epochs, after which the SP loss is added to the objective (vertical dotted line) and optimization continues for the remaining 2750 epochs. Solid and dashed curves denote the training and test losses (shown losses are smoothed with an exponential moving average … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of the normalized physics loss for the super-resolution model. Left: physics loss based on the SP residual. Right: physics loss based on a first-order KDK approximation. Physics-informed training significantly reduces the losses on both the training and test sets. Solid and dashed lines denote the training and test sets, respectively (shown losses are smoothed with an exponential moving average with α= 0.1… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution Model: Comparison of the ground-truth and predicted projected fields ⟨|R|⟩z, ⟨|I|⟩z, and density log10⟨ρ⟩z at scale factor a=0.156, obtained by averaging the corresponding 643 fields along the z-axis. Columns show the initial condition, reference solution, ne…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of super-resolution density fields generated by the model trained with the SP physics loss for the unseen test realizations. The corresponding scale factors are (from top to bottom) a ≈ 0.08039, 0.08042, 0.08043, and 0.08039. The input low-resolution fields (3…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of super-resolution density fields generated by the model trained with the first-order KDK approx. for the unseen test realizations. The corresponding scale factors are (from top to bottom) a ≈ 0.08043, 0.08039, 0.08042, and 0.08039. The input low-resolution f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mean fractional power-spectrum error, (PSR/PHR −1), across the test realizations at the mid-scale factor a ≈ 0.08041. The shaded regions denote the corresponding 1σ scatter across realizations. Left: SR model trained with the SP-residual based physics loss. Right: SR m…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mean absolute relative error in the predicted power spectrum, ⟨|Ppred/Ptrue −1|⟩ as a function of the scale factor a. The shaded vertical bands indicate the boundaries of the full data interval. The prediction error is minimized within the central region and increases …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of density fields generated by evolution model the unseen test realizations. The generated fields (643 , Gen), and target density fields (643 , Real) are shown as density projections along the z-axis on a logarithmic scale. Insets show zoomed-in regions. The r…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2025 , eprint=

    QCPINN: Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  2. [2]

    2025 , eprint=

    Quantum physics informed neural networks for multi-variable partial differential equations , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  3. [3]

    Workshop Proceedings of the 53rd International Conference on Parallel Processing , pages =

    Hegde, Pratibha Raghupati and Markidis, Stefano , title =. Workshop Proceedings of the 53rd International Conference on Parallel Processing , pages =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3677333.3678272 , abstract =

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Entropy , VOLUME =

    Trahan, Corey and Loveland, Mark and Dent, Samuel , TITLE =. Entropy , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

    2024

  5. [5]

    Variational quantum simulation using non-Gaussian continuous-variable systems , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043212 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043212 2024

  6. [6]

    Quantum error mitigation for rotation-symmetric bosonic codes with symmetry expansion , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.062402 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.062402 2025

  7. [7]

    Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits , journal =

    Weizhou Cai and Yuwei Ma and Weiting Wang and Chang-Ling Zou and Luyan Sun , keywords =. Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2020.12.006 , url =

    doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2020.12.006 2021

  8. [8]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Quantum Error Correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Code , author =. PRX Quantum , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020101 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020101 2021

Show all 130 references
  1. [9]

    Continuous-variable quantum neural networks , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033063 , url =

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Gaussian quantum information , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 , url =

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    Inequivalence between the Schr\"odinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equations , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1613 , url =

    1994 doi

  4. [12]

    Physical Review Research , keywords =

    From Vlasov-Poisson to Schr \"o dinger-Poisson: Dark matter simulation with a quantum variational time evolution algorithm. Physical Review Research , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013282 , archivePrefix =. 2307.06032 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    , keywords =

    Toward Cosmological Simulations of Dark Matter on Quantum Computers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe6ac , archivePrefix =. 2101.05821 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Peccei, R. D. and Quinn, Helen R. , journal =. 1977 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440 , url =

    1977 doi

  7. [15]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Sub-Sequential Physics-Informed Learning with State Space Model. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.00318 , archivePrefix =. 2502.00318 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Physics-Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Power System Dynamics. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.06650 , archivePrefix =. 2408.06650 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , keywords =

    Understanding and Mitigating Gradient Flow Pathologies in Physics-Informed Neural Networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1137/20M1318043 , archivePrefix =. 2001.04536 , primaryClass =

    2001 arXiv

  10. [18]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2007.14527 , archivePrefix =. 2007.14527 , primaryClass =

    2007 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Pearlmutter and Alexey Andreyevich Radul and Jeffrey Mark Siskind , title =

    Atilim Gunes Baydin and Barak A. Pearlmutter and Alexey Andreyevich Radul and Jeffrey Mark Siskind , title =. Journal of Machine Learning Research , year =

  12. [20]

    Deep learning

    Yann Lecun and Yoshua Bengio and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. Nature. 2015. doi:10.1038/nature14539

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Journal of Heat Transfer , volume =

    Cai, Shengze and Wang, Zhicheng and Wang, Sifan and Perdikaris, Paris and Karniadakis, George Em , title =. Journal of Heat Transfer , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1115/1.4050542 , url =

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , journal =

    Xiaowei Jin and Shengze Cai and Hui Li and George Em Karniadakis , keywords =. NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951 , url =

    2021

  15. [23]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Hidden Fluid Mechanics: A Navier-Stokes Informed Deep Learning Framework for Assimilating Flow Visualization Data. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1808.04327 , archivePrefix =. 1808.04327 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    , keywords =

    Towards super-resolution simulations of the fuzzy dark matter cosmological model. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2341 , archivePrefix =. 2210.12907 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    , keywords =

    Super-resolution emulator of cosmological simulations using deep physical models. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1428 , archivePrefix =. 2001.05519 , primaryClass =

    2001 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =

    AI-assisted superresolution cosmological simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022038118 , archivePrefix =. 2010.06608 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    SPINN: Advancing Cosmological Simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter with Physics Informed Neural Networks. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade43e , archivePrefix =. 2506.02957 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Updated bounds on ultra-light dark matter from the tiniest galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.02781 , archivePrefix =. 2509.02781 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    , keywords =

    Warm and fuzzy dark matter: Free streaming of wave dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023535 , archivePrefix =. 2406.12970 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Universe , keywords =

    Warm Dark Matter in Simulations. Universe , keywords =. doi:10.3390/universe8020076 , adsurl =

    doi

  23. [31]

    Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1158 , url =

    2000 doi

  24. [32]

    Dynamical evidence of a dark solitonic core of 109M⊙ in the milky way , journal =

    Ivan. Dynamical evidence of a dark solitonic core of 109M⊙ in the milky way , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2020.100503 , url =

    2020

  25. [33]

    Limits on primordial black holes from M87 , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063506 , url =

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Baryonic solutions and challenges for cosmological models of dwarf galaxies. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01689-w , archivePrefix =. 2206.05295 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Physics informed neural networks for simulating radiative transfer , journal =

    Siddhartha Mishra and Roberto Molinaro , keywords =. Physics informed neural networks for simulating radiative transfer , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107705 , url =

    2021

  28. [36]

    Physics of Fluids , volume =

    Ren, Xiang and Hu, Peng and Su, Hua and Zhang, Feizhou and Yu, Huahua , title =. Physics of Fluids , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0200384 , url =

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00135-7 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0112551 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =

    Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789 , adsurl =

    2019

  31. [39]

    Zhao, D. H. and Mo, H. J. and Jing, Y. P. and Börner, G. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06135.x , url =

    2003

  32. [40]

    , keywords =

    Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 , adsurl =

    doi

  33. [41]

    , keywords =

    A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/508162 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608407 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    , keywords =

    Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc). , keywords =. doi:10.1086/158003 , adsurl =

    doi

  35. [43]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.00803 , archivePrefix =. 2502.00803 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    PinnDE: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.10011 , archivePrefix =. 2408.10011 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A hands-on introduction to Physics-Informed Neural Networks for solving partial differential equations with benchmark tests taken from astrophysics and plasma physics. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.00599 , archivePrefix =. 2403.00599 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111402 , archivePrefix =. 2202.11821 , primaryClass =

    2022

  39. [47]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    DAE-PINN: A Physics-Informed Neural Network Model for Simulating Differential-Algebraic Equations with Application to Power Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.04304 , archivePrefix =. 2109.04304 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 , archivePrefix =. 1912.01703 , primaryClass =

    1912 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    , keywords =

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/300499 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9805201 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    2015 , publisher=

    Neural Networks and Deep Learning , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  43. [51]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2006.10739 , archivePrefix =. 2006.10739 , primaryClass =

    2006 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =

    Multilevel domain decomposition-based architectures for physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117116 , archivePrefix =. 2306.05486 , primaryClass =

    2024

  45. [53]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2107.07871 , archivePrefix =. 2107.07871 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1806.08734 , archivePrefix =. 1806.08734 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Tutorial on the Use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Compute the Spectrum of Quantum Systems. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.20669 , archivePrefix =. 2407.20669 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    B-PINNs: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109913 , archivePrefix =. 2003.06097 , primaryClass =

    2020

  49. [57]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =

    Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732 , archivePrefix =. 1906.02382 , primaryClass =

    2019

  50. [58]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    Physics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.024 , archivePrefix =. 1901.06314 , primaryClass =

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    and Geiger, Bernhard C

    Hoffer, Johannes G. and Geiger, Bernhard C. and Ofner, Patrick and Kern, Roman , TITLE =. Applied Sciences , VOLUME =. 2021 , NUMBER =

    2021

  52. [60]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    DPM: A Novel Training Method for Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Extrapolation. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2012.02681 , archivePrefix =. 2012.02681 , primaryClass =

    2012 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    Numerical Optimization

    Line Search Methods. Numerical Optimization. 2006. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5_3

    2006 doi

  54. [62]

    SIAM Review , volume =

    Wolfe, Philip , title =. SIAM Review , volume =. 1971 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1137/1013035 , abstract =

    1971 doi

  55. [63]

    SIAM Review , volume =

    Wolfe, Philip , title =. SIAM Review , volume =. 1969 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1137/1011036 , abstract =

    1969 doi

  56. [64]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.11833 , archivePrefix =. 2307.11833 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces with Physics-Informed Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.09338 , archivePrefix =. 2109.09338 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices with Limited Storage , urldate =

    Jorge Nocedal , journal =. Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices with Limited Storage , urldate =

  59. [67]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.01868 , archivePrefix =. 2402.01868 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 , archivePrefix =. 1412.6980 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2006.09661 , archivePrefix =. 2006.09661 , primaryClass =

    2006 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages =

    Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , author =. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages =. 2010 , editor =

    2010

  63. [71]

    , keywords =

    The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1504 , archivePrefix =. 1504.01437 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Hybrid Scheme for Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations Combining the Schr \"o dinger and Hamilton-Jacobi-Madelung Equations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.17288 , archivePrefix =. 2411.17288 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Cosmological Simulation for Fuzzy Dark Matter Model. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00048 , archivePrefix =. 1809.09848 , primaryClass =

    2018

  66. [74]

    , keywords =

    Numerical and perturbative computations of the fuzzy dark matter model. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063509 , archivePrefix =. 1810.01915 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    , keywords =

    AX-GADGET: a new code for cosmological simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter and Axion models. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1224 , archivePrefix =. 1801.08144 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    , keywords =

    Contrasting Galaxy Formation from Quantum Wave Dark Matter, DM, with CDM, using Planck and Hubble Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/89 , archivePrefix =. 1508.04621 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    Solution of the Schr \"o dinger Equation by a Spectral Method. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(82)90091-2 , adsurl =

    doi

  70. [78]

    , keywords =

    A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103512 , archivePrefix =. 1410.2896 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Mocz, Philip , doi =

  72. [80]

    and Nelson, Dylan and Pillepich, Annalisa , title =

    Thiele, Leander and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Spergel, David N. and Nelson, Dylan and Pillepich, Annalisa , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb80f , url =

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Wadekar, Digvijay and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Ho, Shirley and Perreault-Levasseur, Laurence , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac033a , url =

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2010.08895 , archivePrefix =. 2010.08895 , primaryClass =

    2010 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Physics-Guided, Physics-Informed, and Physics-Encoded Neural Networks in Scientific Computing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2211.07377 , archivePrefix =. 2211.07377 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  76. [84]

    , keywords =

    Ultra-light dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00135-6 , archivePrefix =. 2005.03254 , primaryClass =

    2005 arXiv

  77. [85]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.00705 , archivePrefix =. 2507.00705 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics , keywords =

    Fuzzy dark matter simulations. Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s41115-026-00027-5 , archivePrefix =. 2509.23231 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    , keywords =

    Fuzzy Dark Matter and the 21 cm Power Spectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf0a9 , archivePrefix =. 2101.07177 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    , keywords =

    Field-level Neural Network Emulator for Cosmological N-body Simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb6c , archivePrefix =. 2206.04594 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    AI-assisted super-resolution cosmological simulations IV: An emulator for deterministic realizations. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.129471 , archivePrefix =. 2408.09051 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systems , journal =

    Kevin Linka and Amelie Schäfer and Xuhui Meng and Zongren Zou and George Em Karniadakis and Ellen Kuhl , keywords =. Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systems , journal =. 2022 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115346 , url =

    2022

  83. [91]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Chen, Shu-Rong and Schive, Hsi-Yu and Chiueh, Tzihong , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx449 , url =

    2017 doi

  84. [92]

    and Finley, Claire and Gomez, Loraine V

    Lujan, Nathaniel and Gebhardt, Karl and Anantua, Richard and Chase, Owen and Debski, Maya H. and Finley, Claire and Gomez, Loraine V. and Gupta, Om and Lawson, Alex J. and Marron, Izabella and Martinez, Zorayda and Painter, Connor A. and Sklansky, Yonatan and West, Hayley , ti...

    2025 doi

  85. [93]

    , keywords =

    Viability of ultralight bosonic dark matter in dwarf galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063010 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05244 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Halo mass functions in mixed cold and fuzzy dark matter models. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.06599 , archivePrefix =. 2606.06599 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Mixed Dark Matter: Limits from the Milky Way Satellite Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.10006 , archivePrefix =. 2606.10006 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Matter. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.01705 , archivePrefix =. 2406.01705 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    LESnets (large-eddy simulation nets): Physics-informed neural operator for large-eddy simulation of turbulence. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114125 , archivePrefix =. 2411.04502 , primaryClass =

    2025

  90. [98]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spaces. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2108.08481 , archivePrefix =. 2108.08481 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    , keywords =

    Diverse dark matter haloes in two-field fuzzy dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/w9j1-k7b3 , archivePrefix =. 2408.00827 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  92. [101]

    , title =

    Martel, Hugo and Shapiro, Paul R. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01497.x , url =

    1998

  93. [102]

    , keywords =

    Structure formation in large-volume cosmological simulations of fuzzy dark matter: impact of the non-linear dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1764 , archivePrefix =. 2101.01828 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  94. [103]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Solitons in the dark: non-linear structure formation with fuzzy dark matter. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2007.04119 , archivePrefix =. 2007.04119 , primaryClass =

    2007 doi arXiv

  95. [104]

    , keywords =

    Tidal disruption of fuzzy dark matter subhalo cores. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063507 , archivePrefix =. 1801.04864 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  96. [105]

    and Zavala, Jesús and Boylan-Kolchin, Michael and Fialkov, Anastasia and Hernquist, Lars , title =

    Mocz, Philip and Vogelsberger, Mark and Robles, Victor H. and Zavala, Jesús and Boylan-Kolchin, Michael and Fialkov, Anastasia and Hernquist, Lars , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1887 , url =

    2017 doi

  97. [106]

    , keywords =

    Wave Dark Matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010024 , archivePrefix =. 2101.11735 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  98. [107]

    Symmetry , keywords =

    Direct Detection of Dark Matter: A Critical Review. Symmetry , keywords =. doi:10.3390/sym16020201 , archivePrefix =. 2310.20472 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  99. [108]

    , keywords =

    Schr \"o dinger-Poisson-Vlasov-Poisson correspondence. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083519 , archivePrefix =. 1801.03507 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  100. [109]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =

    Invisible axion search methods. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015004 , archivePrefix =. 2003.02206 , primaryClass =

    2003 arXiv

  101. [110]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Axion Cosmology. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1510.07633 , archivePrefix =. 1510.07633 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    , keywords =

    String axiverse. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530 , archivePrefix =. 0905.4720 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  103. [112]

    , keywords =

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541 , archivePrefix =. 1610.08297 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  104. [113]

    Nature Physics , keywords =

    Cosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave. Nature Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nphys2996 , archivePrefix =. 1406.6586 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  105. [114]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =

    Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308716112 , archivePrefix =. 1306.0913 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  106. [115]

    , keywords =

    Small-Scale Challenges to the CDM Paradigm. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 , archivePrefix =. 1707.04256 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  107. [116]

    Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =

    Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 , adsurl =

    2018 doi

  108. [117]

    Zeitschrift fur Physik , year = 1927, month = mar, volume =

    Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form. Zeitschrift fur Physik , year = 1927, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1007/BF01400372 , adsurl =

    1927 doi

  109. [118]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

    2018 arXiv

  110. [119]

    f-PICNN: A physics-informed convolutional neural network for partial differential equations with space-time domain , journal =

    Biao Yuan and He Wang and Ana Heitor and Xiaohui Chen , keywords =. f-PICNN: A physics-informed convolutional neural network for partial differential equations with space-time domain , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113284 , url =

    2024

  111. [120]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Physics informed Neural Networks applied to the description of wave-particle resonance in kinetic simulations of fusion plasmas. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.12312 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12312 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  112. [121]

    Annalen der Physik , keywords =

    Dark matter and cosmic structure. Annalen der Physik , keywords =. doi:10.1002/andp.201200212 , archivePrefix =. 1210.0544 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  113. [123]

    , keywords =

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications of the large-scale two-point correlation function. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21502.x , archivePrefix =. 1203.6616 , primaryClass =

    2012

  114. [124]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learning. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.13228 , archivePrefix =. 2410.13228 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  115. [125]

    2016 , isbn =

    Ribeiro, Marco Tulio and Singh, Sameer and Guestrin, Carlos , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 , booktitle =

    2016

  116. [126]

    dm2gal: Mapping Dark Matter to Galaxies with Neural Networks

    Kasmanoff, Noah and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Tinker, Jeremy and Ho, Shirley. dm2gal: Mapping Dark Matter to Galaxies with Neural Networks. 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020. arXiv:2012.00186

    2020 arXiv

  117. [127]

    MNRAS , volume =

    Bernardini, M and Feldmann, R and Anglés-Alcázar, D and Boylan-Kolchin, M and Bullock, J and Mayer, L and Stadel, J , title = ". MNRAS , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3088 , url =

    2021 doi

  118. [128]

    MNRAS , author =

    A deep learning model to emulate simulations of cosmic reionization , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2605 , number =

    2019 doi

  119. [129]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Siyu He and Yin Li and Yu Feng and Shirley Ho and Siamak Ravanbakhsh and Wei Chen and Barnabás Póczos , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  120. [130]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Biwei Dai and Uroš Seljak , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  121. [131]

    2022 , month =

    Neerav Kaushal and Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro and Elena Giusarma and Yin Li and Conner Hawry and Mauricio Reyes , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c4a , url =

    2022 doi

  122. [132]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    PINION: Physics-informed neural network for accelerating radiative transfer simulations for cosmic reionization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.