Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Interlayer interactions reshape charge-density wave through electronic elasticity in 4H$_{\mathrm{b}}$-TaS$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In 4Hb-TaS2, the incommensurate charge-density wave on 1H layers acts as an elastic degree of freedom: its wave vector compresses by 2.3% or expands by 3.2% depending on the stacking registry of the surrounding 1T CDW layers.

desk verdict Careful STM work showing the buried 1H CDW in 4Hb-TaS2 takes two discrete q-vectors that track the stacking of the adjacent 1T CDWs; the absolute 'compressive/tensile' labels rest on a surface reference the paper never validates. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21470 v1 pith:HS5OB37D submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.str-el

Carolina A. Marques , Martha Rösler , Berk Zengin , Aleš Cahlík , Edoardo Martino , Konstantin Semeniuk , Helmuth Berger , László Forró
show 2 more authors
Ana Akrap Fabian D. Natterer
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chargedensitywave4Hb-TaS2electronicelasticityinterlayerregistryscanningtunnelingmicroscopymoirépatternflatbandvanderWaalsheterostructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the ordering wave vector of an incommensurate charge-density wave is not a fixed material constant but an elastic, soft degree of freedom that responds to the stacking arrangement of neighboring layers. Using 4Hb-TaS2, where 1H layers with an incommensurate CDW sit between 1T layers with a lattice-locked CDW, the authors find that the 1H CDW compresses by 2.3% when the surrounding CDWs are aligned and expands by 3.2% when they are rotated by 27.8°. These elastic states come with few-meV shifts of a flat band, showing that weak interlayer interactions can reshape electronic structure through CDW elasticity. If right, this explains why nominally identical samples report different CDW wave vectors and points to a general mechanism by which stacking controls correlated electronic phases in layered materials.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three tools: the lattice-locked √13×√13 CDW of the 1T layers, used as a rigid in-situ reference for measuring the buried 1H CDW q-vector; Fourier analysis of large-field STM conductance maps, with moiré-pattern simulations that reproduce the observed peaks and fix the strained q-values; and a minimal free-energy model F(q,θ) = (K/2)(q−qH00)² + λ(θ)(q−qH00), whose minimization gives (q−qH00)/qH00 = −λ/(K qH00). The model turns the registry-dependent force λ(θ) into a measurable strain and yields an estimated stiffness K ≈ 10 eVŲ, making a 2–3% deformation cost only a few meV.

What would settle it

Grow or pattern 1T/1H/1T stacks where the relative orientation of the two 1T CDWs is controlled (aligned vs. 27.8°-rotated) while keeping all other conditions identical, and measure the 1H CDW q-vector with the same STM method. If the q-vector does not switch between the two elastic states, or if the same q difference appears in regions with unchanged registry, the central claim fails. A simpler check: compare a buried 1H layer in a region where the two 1T CDWs are aligned but the interlayer distance is modified; the flat-band shift should track the CDW strain if the proposed elastic mechanism

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the ordering wave vector of an incommensurate CDW is an intrinsic elastic variable, not a fixed material constant. In 4Hb-TaS2, where 1H layers host an incommensurate CDW and 1T layers host a commensurate √13×√13 CDW, the authors use the 1T CDW as a rigid internal reference and measure the q-vector of the 1H CDW in two buried configurations. When the two surrounding 1T CDWs are aligned, the 1H CDW is compressed by 2.3% relative to a 1H-terminated surface; when rotated by 27.8°, it is expanded by 3.2%. Corresponding flat dispersions sit at 14 mV and 5 mV in the compressed region and at 4 mV and 0 mV in the tensile region, i.e., a few-meV shift toward the Ferm

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CDW q-vector on a 1H-terminated surface is the unstrained reference; if simply sandwiching a 1H layer between two 1T layers shifts its q-vector through charge transfer or burial effects, the quoted −2.3% and +3.2% strains would need renormalizing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sample-to-sample scatter in incommensurate CDW wave vectors can be intrinsic, set by stacking registry, rather than only by disorder or external strain.
  • The incommensurate CDW q-vector can serve as a local, surface-sensitive probe of interlayer registry in van der Waals stacks.
  • Registry-controlled CDW elasticity directly shifts low-energy electronic states, demonstrated here by the few-meV flat-band shift between the two elastic states.
  • The estimated stiffness K ≈ 10 eVŲ means 2–3% CDW deformations cost only a few meV, so comparable registry-induced q-shifts should be expected in other layered CDW systems.
  • The framework unifies previously reported thickness-, pressure-, and strain-dependent CDW periodicities in NbSe2 and related dichalcogenides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the elasticity picture holds, controlled twist-angle experiments in artificial 1T/1H/1T stacks should reveal intermediate elastic states and map the registry force λ(θ) as a continuous function, not just two discrete points.
  • The registry-dependent elastic energy is a plausible microscopic channel connecting stacking to the pressure dependence of superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2; the paper suggests but does not prove this link.
  • The same analysis could be applied to the scattered q-values reported in 4Hb-TaSe2 and other natural heterostructures, predicting that registry variations account for at least part of that scatter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a low-temperature STM study of 4Hb-TaS2, focusing on the incommensurate CDW on 1H layers that are sandwiched between commensurate 1T-CDW layers. By analyzing large-field-of-view dI/dV maps and their Fourier transforms, the authors resolve two distinct buried-1H-CDW states, D1 and D2, with wave vectors q0H0 = 0.797 Å-1 and 0.754 Å-1. Taking qH00 = 0.779 Å-1 measured on a 1H-terminated surface as the zero-strain reference, they label these compressive (−2.3%) and tensile (+3.2%) elastic states. The two states are correlated with the relative rotational alignment of the 1T CDWs on the two surrounding 1T layers. QPI measurements show flat-band features shifted by a few meV between D1 and D2. A minimal elastic free energy F(q,θ) = (K/2)(q−qH00)2 + λ(θ)(q−qH00) is used to relate the observed q shifts to an interlayer registry force and to estimate K ≈ 10 eVÅ2 and an elastic energy cost of a few meV.

Significance. If the quantitative strain interpretation is accepted, the paper establishes a conceptually important mechanism: the ordering wave vector of an incommensurate CDW behaves as an elastic degree of freedom controlled by interlayer registry. This could explain sample-to-sample variability of CDW wave vectors in layered TMDs and connects stacking to low-energy electronic structure. The central observation—that the buried 1H CDW q-vector changes systematically with the stacking of the adjacent 1T CDWs—is plausible and supported by careful Fourier analysis, moiré simulations, and the use of the lattice-pinned 1T CDW as an internal calibration. The paper also demonstrates a technically strong spectroscopic mapping approach. However, the absolute signs and magnitudes of the strain labels, and the causal interpretation of the flat-band shifts, are less secure than the abstract suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2 and Table S2] The D1–D2 splitting is internally robust because it is based on directly observed moiré peaks (Δq ≈ 0.043 Å−1, about 5.4%). However, the compressive (−2.3%) and tensile (+3.2%) labels are anchored to qH00 measured on a 1H-terminated surface, where the 1H layer has one 1T neighbor and a vacuum interface. The buried 1H layers in D1 and D2 have two 1T neighbors and experience charge transfer; no unstrained buried reference is measured. If the true zero-force q for a buried 1H layer were 0.797 Å−1, D1 would be unstrained and D2 would be tensile at +5.4%; if it were lower than 0.754 Å−1, both states would be compressive. Thus the sign and magnitude of the reported strains are conditional on an unverified baseline. The paper should either supply a buried reference (e.g., via DFT or a different experimental geometry) or reframe the quantitative claim as a registry-induced q-splitting without ab
  2. [Discussion, elastic model] The estimate of the elastic parameters is not an independent test of the model. In the Discussion, λ is approximated as ΔE/Δq using the measured flat-band shift ΔE ≈ 5 meV and the measured wave-vector change Δq ≈ 0.02 Å−1; K is then obtained from the minimization equation using the same Δq. The resulting elastic energy cost ΔF ∼ K(Δq)2/2 ≈ few meV is therefore a restatement of the two input measurements, not a verification of the elastic free-energy form. The claim that the energy cost is 'few meV' is thus not independently established. Please label this as a consistency estimate and provide, if possible, an independent bound on K (e.g., from DFT or from the curvature of the CDW free energy).
  3. [Abstract and Discussion, Fig. 3] The abstract states that the few-meV flat-band shifts demonstrate that interlayer interactions reshape the electronic structure 'through the intrinsic elasticity of the incommensurate CDW.' However, the measurements show only that D1 and D2 differ in both the CDW q-vector and the flat-band position. The Discussion itself attributes the flat-band energy to interlayer charge transfer, which also differs between the stacking configurations. The flat-band shift is therefore not uniquely attributable to the CDW strain; it could be a direct consequence of the different 1T/1H/1T stacking and charge transfer. To support the causal claim, one would need to vary q while holding the stacking/charge environment fixed, or show DFT results with the measured q values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'with a mean wave vector close to 2.8×2.8' lacks units; presumably Å−1 or dimensionless q/q_at. Please clarify.
  2. [Results, Fig. 2 caption] The super-moiré vector qTH0-T0T and the inset in panel (f) are described only in the caption; a short explanation in the main text would aid readability.
  3. [Methods and Section S5] The real-space lattice expression in the Methods uses f_α = 1/9 + 8/9 ∏ cos(q_α,i r), while Section S5 writes f_i = 1/9 + 8/9 ∏ cos(1/2 k_i r). These are equivalent only if q = k/2; please make the notation consistent.
  4. [Fig. 3(h)] Typo: 'a board peak' should be 'a broad peak'.
  5. [References] References 45 and 48 appear to duplicate the same arXiv preprint; consider consolidating. Several 2026 in-press references (e.g., refs 27, 44) would benefit from DOI/arXiv identifiers.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Registry-dependent CDW wave vectors are directly measured; circularity is limited to the model's energy-scale estimate, which restates the measured flat-band shift.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Discussion, elastic model paragraph (after the equation (q(θ)-qH00)/qH00 = -λ/(K qH00))]
    "We take the experimentally observed shift of the flat band, ∆E ≈ 5 meV, as a proxy for the sensitivity of the electronic structure to changes in q. Combining this with the measured wave vector variation ∆q ≈ 0.02 Å-1, we obtain an effective force λ ≈ ∂E/∂q ≈ 0.2-0.3 eVÅ, which yields an estimated stiffness K ~ 10 eVÅ2. This corresponds to an elastic energy cost Δ𝐹 ∼ 𝐾(Δ𝑞)2/2 of the order of a few meV for the observed 2–3% deformation."

    In the elastic model, the strain (q−qH00)/qH00 is the measured input, and λ/K is fixed by that same strain via minimization. K is then calibrated by taking λ = ΔE/Δq with the measured Δq and ΔE. Substituting into ΔF ≈ K(Δq)²/2 gives (ΔE/Δq²)·(Δq²/2) = ΔE/2 ≈ 2.5 meV. Thus the quoted 'few-meV elastic energy cost' is algebraically just half of the measured flat-band shift re-expressed through the model; it is not an independent prediction. The sign of λ is likewise defined by the sign of the measured q shift. This is a parameterization/restatement of the input data rather than a derivation of the energy scale, although the registry-dependent q-vectors themselves are directly measured and are not circular.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim—that the buried 1H CDW ordering vector changes discretely with the stacking registry of the surrounding 1T CDWs (D1: q0H0 = 0.797 Å⁻¹; D2: q0H0 = 0.754 Å⁻¹, relative to qH00 = 0.779 Å⁻¹ on the 1H surface)—is inferred directly from STM Fourier peaks and moiré simulations, independently of the elastic model. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem forces this conclusion; the self-citations (Refs. 61–62) are methodological and validated by comparison with conventional QPI in Fig. S7. The only construction-level circularity is in the Discussion's quadratic free-energy model: F(q,θ) is minimized around the measured qH00, λ/K is set by the measured strain, and K is calibrated using the same measured ΔE and Δq. Consequently the derived 'few-meV elastic energy cost' reduces to ΔE/2 and is a restatement of the measured flat-band shift, not an independent result. The compressive/tensile labeling also assumes the 1H-surface qH00 is the zero-strain reference for a buried 1H layer; this is a robustness/baseline assumption rather than a logical circularity, because the registry dependence is still read off directly from the data. Overall, the central observation is self-contained; the model-level energy scale is partially circular, giving a modest score of 3.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entity. Its main additional structure is the phenomenological elastic free energy, whose force and stiffness parameters are fitted to the same data they are used to interpret. The most consequential hidden assumption is the surface-termination baseline for zero strain.

free parameters (3)
  • λ(θ), interlayer registry force = Not independently quantified; opposite signs for D1 and D2
    Introduced in the elastic free energy F(q,θ) to represent the effect of interlayer registry; its magnitude and sign are inferred from the observed q-shifts, not computed from first principles.
  • K, CDW elastic stiffness = ~10 eV Ų
    Estimated in the Discussion as λ ≈ ∂E/∂q ≈ 0.2–0.3 eVÅ from the measured flat-band shift ΔE ≈ 5 meV and Δq ≈ 0.02 Å⁻¹, then K ~ 10 eVŲ. This uses the same data it aims to explain.
  • qH00, surface reference wave vector = 0.779 Å⁻¹
    Measured on the 1H-terminated surface and used as the zero-strain reference for the compressive/tensile labels. Its validity as an unstrained bulk reference is the paper's weakest assumption.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The incommensurate CDW free energy can be expanded to quadratic order in q about qH00, with a linear registry coupling λ(θ) (Eq. F(q,θ)).
    A Taylor expansion of a smooth free energy around its minimum; standard for soft order parameters, but the sign and magnitude of λ are not derived.
  • domain assumption The 1T CDW is rigid and acts as an unaffected internal reference while the 1H CDW deforms.
    The analysis assumes qT00 is identical in D1 and D2 and that only the 1H CDW changes. STM supports the constancy of qT00, but the 1T CDW could also have small elastic responses that are below resolution.
  • domain assumption The 1H-terminated surface qH00 represents the unstrained intrinsic wave vector of the 1H CDW.
    This is load-bearing for the strain percentages. A 1H layer at the free surface has a different environment (one 1T neighbor, vacuum on the other side) than a fully buried 1H layer between two 1T layers, so the reference may be shifted by burial alone.
  • domain assumption Fourier peaks on a 1T-terminated surface can be uniquely attributed to the buried 1H CDW through moiré simulations.
    The q0H0 values in D1 and D2 are extracted by matching simulated moiré patterns to experimental Bragg peaks. This assumes the assignment is unique and that windowing, affine distortion correction, and 6-fold symmetrization do not bias peak positions.
  • domain assumption The observed flat-band shifts are caused by interlayer charge transfer linked to CDW registry, not by other local electronic or tip-related effects.
    The discussion connects D1/D2 flat-band positions to charge transfer between 1T and 1H layers, relying on previous DFT work rather than a direct measurement of the charge transfer in the same regions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interlayer interactions reshape charge-density wave through electronic elasticity in 4H$_{\mathrm{b}}$-TaS$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HS5OB37D

@misc{pith2026260721470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interlayer interactions reshape charge-density wave through electronic elasticity in 4H$_\mathrmb$-TaS$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HS5OB37D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21470}
}
abstract

Incommensurate charge-density waves (CDWs) in layered quantum materials frequently exhibit widely varying ordering wave vectors, even among nominally identical samples, obscuring their intrinsic electronic properties. Here we identify an inherent origin of this variability through the electronic elasticity of an incommensurate CDW using the model heterostructure 4H$_{\mathrm{b}}$-TaS$_2$, composed of alternating commensurate CDW on 1T and incommensurate CDW on 1H layers. Low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy, combined with Fourier and quasiparticle-interference analysis, exploits the lattice-pinned 1T CDW as an internal reference to resolve discrete compressive ($-2.3\%$) and tensile ($+3.2\%$) elastic states of the neighboring 1H CDW selected by the interlayer registry of the adjacent layers. Corresponding few-meV shifts of a flat band demonstrate that weak interlayer interactions reshape the low-energy electronic structure through the intrinsic elasticity of the incommensurate CDW. These findings establish electronic elasticity as a mechanism by which subtle interlayer interactions control correlated electronic states in van der Waals heterostructures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The dynamics of charge-density waves

    Grüner, G. The dynamics of charge-density waves. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129–1181 (1988)

    1988

  2. [2]

    Hwang, J. et al. Charge density waves in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 044502 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    McMillan, W. L. Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate -incommensurate charge-density-wave phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 14, 1496–1502 (1976). 8

    1976

  4. [4]

    Lattice Vibrations in the Charge -Density-Wave States of Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Sugai, S. Lattice Vibrations in the Charge -Density-Wave States of Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. physica status solidi (b) 129, 13–39 (1985)

    1985

  5. [5]

    Bang, J. et al. Charge-ordered phases in the hole -doped triangular Mott insulator 4 Hb-TaS2. Phys. Rev. B 109, 195170 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    & Lieber, C

    Dai, H. & Lieber, C. M. Charge density wave pinning and disorder in two dimensions. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 2362–2367 (1993)

    1993

  7. [7]

    Gao, S. et al. Atomic-scale strain manipulation of a charge density wave. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 6986–6990 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Rice, T. M. Impurity pinning of discommensurations in charge -density waves. Phys. Rev. B 24, 2751–2759 (1981)

    1981

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Subires, D. et al. Order-disorder charge density wave instability in the kagome metal (Cs,Rb)V3Sb5. Nat Commun 14, 1015 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    A., Di Salvo, F

    Wilson, J. A., Di Salvo, F. J. & Mahajan, S. Charge -density waves and superlattices in the metallic layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Advances in Physics 24, 117–201 (1975)

    1975

  3. [11]

    Dai, J. et al. Microscopic evidence for strong periodic lattice distortion in two -dimensional charge-density wave systems. Phys. Rev. B 89, 165140 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    & Sakata, H

    Yoshizawa, S., Sagisaka, K. & Sakata, H. Visualization of Alternating Triangular Domains of Charge Density Waves in 2H-NbSe2 by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Persky, E. et al. Magnetic memory and spontaneous vortices in a van der Waals superconductor. Nature 607, 692–696 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    V., de la Torre, A., Plumb, K

    Riffle, J. V., de la Torre, A., Plumb, K. W. & Hollen, S. M. Cooling rate dependence of charge density wave phases in 1T -TaS2 studied by scanning tunneling microscopy and x -ray diffraction. AIP Advances 14, 105303 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Yan, L. et al. Enhanced Ising superconductivity in a unicompositional bulk 4H b-TaS2 superlattice via pressure. npj Quantum Mater. 10, 104 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    J., Bagley, B

    Di Salvo, F. J., Bagley, B. G., Voorhoeve, J. M. & Waszczak, J. V. Preparation and properties of a new polytype of tantalum disulfide (4H b-TaS2). Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 34, 1357–1362 (1973)

    1973

  9. [17]

    Tanaka, M. et al. Study of 4Hb-TaS2 and graphite intercalation compound by STM/STS. Journal of Microscopy 152, 183–192 (1988)

    1988

  10. [18]

    & Tosatti, E

    Fazekas, P. & Tosatti, E. Electrical, structural and magnetic properties of pure and doped 1T- TaS2. Philosophical Magazine B 39, 229–244 (1979)

    1979

  11. [19]

    & Kitazawa, K

    Kim, J.-J., Yamaguchi, W., Hasegawa, T. & Kitazawa, K. Observation of Mott Localization Gap Using Low Temperature Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy in Commensurate 1T-TaS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2103–2106 (1994)

    1994

  12. [20]

    Sipos, B. et al. From Mott state to superconductivity in 1T -TaS2. Nature Mater 7, 960 –965 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    J., Hull, G

    Di Salvo, F. J., Hull, G. W., Jr., Schwartz, L. H., Voorhoeve, J. M. & Waszczak, J. V. Metal intercalation compounds of TaS2: Preparation and properties. J. Chem. Phys. 59, 1922–1929 (1973)

    1922

  14. [22]

    Guillamón, I. et al. Chiral charge order in the superconductor 2H -TaS2. New J. Phys. 13, 103020 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    H., Frindt, R

    Friend, R. H., Frindt, R. F., Grant, A. J., Yoffe, A. D. & Jerome, D. Electrical conductivity and charge density wave formation in 4H b-TaS2 under pressure. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10, 1013 (1977)

    1977

  16. [24]

    Lin, D. et al. Patterns and driving forces of dimensionality -dependent charge density waves in 2H-type transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Commun 11, 2406 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Crippa, L. et al. Heavy fermions vs doped Mott physics in heterogeneous Ta-dichalcogenide bilayers. Nat Commun 15, (2024). 9

    2024

  18. [26]

    Almoalem, A. et al. Charge transfer and spin-valley locking in 4Hb-TaS2. npj Quantum Mater. 9, 36 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Gofman, R. A. et al. Chiral charge density wave in 1T - and 4H b-TaS2: the role of interlayer coupling. npj Quantum Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-026-00889-1 (2026) doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00889-1

    2026 doi

  20. [28]

    Date, M. et al. Charge transfer empties the flat band in 4H b-TaS2, except at the surface. Commun Phys 9, 60 (2026)

    2026

  21. [29]

    Ribak, A. et al. Chiral superconductivity in the alternate stacking compound 4H b-TaS2. Science Advances 6, eaax9480 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Electrons leave the flatland: out -of-plane charge dynamics in layered materials

    Martino, E. Electrons leave the flatland: out -of-plane charge dynamics in layered materials. (EPFL, 2020). doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-7814

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    H., Frindt, R

    Friend, R. H., Frindt, R. F., Jérome, D. & Grant, A. J. The effect of pressure on the charge density wave transitions in 4Hb-TaS2. Nuov Cim B 38, 554–561 (1977)

    1977

  24. [32]

    V., Drake, B

    Giambattista, B., Johnson, A., Coleman, R. V., Drake, B. & Hansma, P. K. Charge -density waves observed at 4.2 K by scanning -tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 37, 2741 –2744 (1988)

    1988

  25. [33]

    W., Slough, C

    Giambattista, B., Johnson, A., McNairy, W. W., Slough, C. G. & Coleman, R. V. Correlation of scanning-tunneling-microscope image profiles and charge-density-wave amplitudes. Phys. Rev. B 38, 3545–3548 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    R., Pankratov, O

    Han, W., Hunt, E. R., Pankratov, O. & Frindt, R. F. Bias -dependent STM images of charge - density waves on TaS2. Phys. Rev. B 50, 14746–14749 (1994)

    1994

  27. [35]

    G., McNairy, W

    Slough, C. G., McNairy, W. W., Coleman, R. V., Drake, B. & Hansma, P. K. Charge -density waves studied with the use of a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. B 34, 994–1005 (1986)

    1986

  28. [36]

    Tanaka, M. et al. Study of Charge Density Waves in 4Hb–TaS2 by STM/STS. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 473–476 (1989)

    1989

  29. [37]

    Ekvall, I., Kim, J. -J. & Olin, H. Atomic and electronic structures of the two different layers in 4Hb-TaS2 at 4.2 K. Phys. Rev. B 55, 6758–6761 (1997)

    1997

  30. [38]

    Geng, Y. et al. Correlated electrons in the flat band in the charge density wave state of 4Hb−TaSexS2-x. Phys. Rev. B 110, (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Kumar Nayak, A. et al. First-order quantum phase transition in the hybrid metal –Mott insulator transition metal dichalcogenide 4Hb-TaS2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2304274120 (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Shen, S. et al. Coexistence of Quasi-two-dimensional Superconductivity and Tunable Kondo Lattice in a van der Waals Superconductor. Chinese Phys. Lett. 39, 077401 (2022)

    2022

  33. [42]

    Silber, I. et al. Two-component nematic superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2. Nat Commun 15, 824 (2024)

    2024

  34. [43]

    Wen, C. et al. Roles of the Narrow Electronic Band near the Fermi Level in 1T -TaS2-Related Layered Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 256402 (2021)

    2021

  35. [44]

    Wu, P. et al. Unveiling the landscape of Mottness and its proximity to superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2. Nat Commun https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75274-4 (2026) doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75274-4

    2026 doi

  36. [45]

    Nayak, A. K. et al. Evidence of topological boundary modes with topological nodal -point superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 17, 1413–1419 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Ayani, C. G. et al. Unveiling the Interlayer Interaction in a 1H/1T TaS 2 van der Waals Heterostructure. Nano Lett. 24, 10805–10812 (2024)

    2024

  38. [47]

    & Günther, S

    Zeller, P. & Günther, S. What are the possible moiré patterns of graphene on hexagonally packed surfaces? Universal solution for hexagonal coincidence lattices, derived by a geometric construction. New J. Phys. 16, 083028 (2014). 10

    2014

  39. [48]

    Wu, P. et al. Unveiling the landscape of Mottness and its proximity to superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17861 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  40. [49]

    & Smith, N

    Rossnagel, K. & Smith, N. V. Spin -orbit coupling in the band structure of reconstructed 1T−TaS2. Phys. Rev. B 73, 073106 (2006)

    2006

  41. [50]

    On the origin of charge -density waves in select layered transition -metal dichalcogenides

    Rossnagel, K. On the origin of charge -density waves in select layered transition -metal dichalcogenides. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 213001 (2011)

    2011

  42. [51]

    J., Yoshida, M., Hanaguri, T

    Butler, C. J., Yoshida, M., Hanaguri, T. & Iwasa, Y. Mottness versus unit -cell doubling as the driver of the insulating state in 1T-TaS2. Nat Commun 11, 2477 (2020)

    2020

  43. [52]

    & Geck, J

    Ritschel, T., Berger, H. & Geck, J. Stacking-driven gap formation in layered 1T-TaS2. Phys. Rev. B 98, 195134 (2018)

    2018

  44. [53]

    J., Wexler, G

    Doran, N. J., Wexler, G. & Woolley, A. M. Fermi surfaces, charge-transfer and charge-density- waves in 4Hb-TaS2. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 11, 2967–2982 (1978)

    1978

  45. [54]

    Sánchez-Ramírez, I., Vergniory, M. G. & de Juan, F. Charge transfer in heterostructures of T and H transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 110, 195138 (2024)

    2024

  46. [55]

    Mathew Roy, R. et al. Interlayer Charge Transfer Induced by Electronic Instabilities in the Natural van der Waals Heterostructure 4Hb-TaS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 116503 (2025)

    2025

  47. [56]

    Calandra, M., Mazin, I. I. & Mauri, F. Effect of dimensionality on the charge -density wave in few-layer 2H-NbSe2. Phys. Rev. B 80, 241108 (2009)

    2009

  48. [57]

    Feng, Y. et al. Itinerant density wave instabilities at classical and quantum critical points. Nature Phys 11, 865–871 (2015)

    2015

  49. [58]

    Soumyanarayanan, A. et al. Quantum phase transition from triangular to stripe charge order in NbSe2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1623–1627 (2013)

    2013

  50. [59]

    Arguello, C. J. et al. Visualizing the charge density wave transition in 2H-NbSe2 in real space. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235115 (2014)

    2014

  51. [60]

    1: General Principles and Applications to Clean and Absorbate-Covered Surfaces / H

    Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. 1: General Principles and Applications to Clean and Absorbate-Covered Surfaces / H. -J. Güntherodt ... (Eds.). With Contrib. by D. Anselmetti . (Springer, Berlin, 1994)

    1994

  52. [61]

    Zengin, B. et al. Fast spectroscopic mapping of two-dimensional quantum materials. Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042025 (2021)

    2021

  53. [62]

    & Natterer, F

    Oppliger, J. & Natterer, F. D. Sparse sampling for fast quasiparticle -interference mapping. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023117 (2020)

    2020

  54. [63]

    & Günther, S

    Zeller, P. & Günther, S. What are the possible moiré patterns of graphene on hexagonally packed surfaces? Universal solution for hexagonal coincidence lattices, derived by a geometric construction. New J. Phys. 16, 083028 (2014). 11 Fig.1: Figure 1 -Real space super modulation...

    2014

  55. [64]

    S3, and Figs.2,3 of the main manuscript, which we call fast-QPI

    to perform the large area QPI maps shown in Fig. S3, and Figs.2,3 of the main manuscript, which we call fast-QPI. To illustrate the improved energy and q -resolution, we compare two maps taken with the conventional mapping and fast-QPI in Fig. S7 taken on the same surface. It ...

  56. [65]

    D. E. Moncton, J. D. Axe, F. J. DiSalvo, Study of Superlattice Formation in 2H -NbSe2 and 2H- TaSe2 by Neutron Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 734–737 (1975)

    1975

  57. [66]

    Soumyanarayanan, M

    A. Soumyanarayanan, M. M. Yee, Y. He, J. van Wezel, D. J. Rahn, K. Rossnagel, E. W. Hudson, M. R. Norman, J. E. Hoffman, Quantum phase transition from triangular to stripe charge order in NbSe2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1623–1627 (2013)

    2013

  58. [67]

    Yoshizawa, K

    S. Yoshizawa, K. Sagisaka, H. Sakata, Visualization of Alternating Triangular Domains of Charge Density Waves in 2H−NbSe 2 by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  59. [68]

    Leininger, D

    Ph. Leininger, D. Chernyshov, A. Bosak, H. Berger, D. S. Inosov, Competing charge density waves and temperature-dependent nesting in 2H-TaSe2. Phys. Rev. B 83, 233101 (2011)

    2011

  60. [69]

    F. J. Di Salvo, D. E. Moncton, J. A. Wilson, S. Mahajan, Coexistence of two charge -density waves of different symmetry in 4Hb−TaSe2. Phys. Rev. B 14, 1543–1546 (1976)

    1976

  61. [70]

    G. A. Scholz, O. Singh, R. F. Frindt, A. E. Curzon, Charge density wave commensurability in 2H-TaS2 and AgxTaS2. Solid State Communications 44, 1455–1459 (1982)

    1982

  62. [71]

    J. Dai, E. Calleja, J. Alldredge, X. Zhu, L. Li, W. Lu, Y. Sun, T. Wolf, H. Berger, K. McElroy, Microscopic evidence for strong periodic lattice distortion in two -dimensional charge - density wave systems. Phys. Rev. B 89, 165140 (2014)

    2014

  63. [72]

    C. G. Ayani, M. Bosnar, F. Calleja, A. P. Solé, O. Stetsovych, I. M. Ibarburu, C. Rebanal, M. Garnica, R. Miranda, M. M. Otrokov, M. Ondráček, P. Jelínek, A. Arnau, A. L. Vázquez De Parga, Unveiling the Interlayer Interaction in a 1H/1T -TaS2 van der Waals Heterostructure. Nan...

    2024

  64. [73]

    S. Shen, T. Qin, J. Gao, C. Wen, J. Wang, W. Wang, J. Li, X. Luo, W. Lu, Y. Sun, S. Yan, Coexistence of Quasi-two-dimensional Superconductivity and Tunable Kondo Lattice in a van der Waals Superconductor. Chinese Phys. Lett. 39, 077401 (2022)

    2022

  65. [74]

    Zeller, S

    P. Zeller, S. Günther, What are the possible moiré patterns of graphene on hexagonally packed surfaces? Universal solution for hexagonal coincidence lattices, derived by a geometric construction. New J. Phys. 16, 083028 (2014)

    2014

  66. [75]

    Oppliger, F

    J. Oppliger, F. D. Natterer, Sparse sampling for fast quasiparticle -interference mapping. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023117 (2020)

    2020

  67. [76]

    Zengin, J

    B. Zengin, J. Oppliger, D. Liu, L. Niggli, T. Kurosawa, F. D. Natterer, Fast spectroscopic mapping of two-dimensional quantum materials. Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042025 (2021)

    2021

  68. [77]

    Oppliger, B

    J. Oppliger, B. Zengin, D. Liu, K. Hauser, C. Witteveen, F. von Rohr, F. D. Natterer, Adaptive sparse sampling for quasiparticle interference imaging. MethodsX 9, 101784 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.