Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 57 references

Hele-Shaw limit of chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes flows

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that, as the diffusion exponent m grows, weak solutions of the chemotaxis–Navier–Stokes system with porous-medium diffusion converge to a Hele-Shaw type free boundary problem in which the cell density is capped at one…

desk verdict A real new result with a repairable gap: the proof of the third Hele-Shaw graph relation uses a false identity, but a one-line Stampacchia argument fixes it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11757 v2 pith:HT7DLZVF submitted 2025-06-13 math.AP

Qingyou He , Ling-Yun Shou , Leyun Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A0135B4035B4435K5576D2792C17
keywords Hele-Shawlimitchemotaxis-Navier-Stokessystemporousmediumdiffusionstiffpressurelawfreeboundaryproblemcomplementarityrelationglobalweaksolutionsdegenerateellipticequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves two related results for the chemotaxis–Navier–Stokes system with porous-medium diffusion, a model of bacteria swimming in a viscous fluid and consuming oxygen. First, for every diffusion exponent $m\ge3$, global weak solutions exist in $\mathbb{R}^d$, $d\ge2$, with regularity bounds that do not depend on $m$. Second, as $m\to\infty$ these solutions converge to a Hele-Shaw type free boundary problem: the limiting cell density is capped at $1$, the limiting bacterium pressure obeys the stiff pressure law, and the pressure satisfies the degenerate elliptic complementarity relation $P_\infty(\Delta P_\infty-\nabla\cdot(\chi(c_\infty)\nabla c_\infty))=0$ in the sense of distributions. If correct, the paper gives the first rigorous derivation of the Hele-Shaw limit for a chemotaxis-fluid system and identifies the stiff pressure law as the mechanism that prevents the cell density from exceeding one.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the effective bacterium pressure $P_m=\frac{m}{m-1}n_m^{m-1}$, whose equation is close to a porous-medium equation with chemotactic drift, together with the energy functional $E(t)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}(\frac{1}{m-2}P_m+\frac12|\nabla c_m|^2+\frac12|u_m|^2)\,dx$. Uniform-in-$m$ estimates from this energy, an $L^{m+1}$ estimate for $n_m$, the bound $m\|(n_m-1)_+\|^2_{L^2}\le C$ obtained through a Newtonian-potential test function, and the identity $n_m^m=\frac{m-1}{m}n_mP_m$ identify both weak limits as $P_\infty$. The complementarity relation is then verified without strong compactness of gradients, by testing the limiting system with $\varphi P_\infty$ and using a difference-quotient argument to show $\int\partial_t n_\infty\,\varphi P_\infty=0$.

What would settle it

Take a sequence of initial data with fixed $L^1$ mass but $\|n_{m,0}\|_{L^{m+1}(\mathbb{R}^d)}\to\infty$ as $m\to\infty$, so that (H3) fails, and check whether any limit still satisfies $0\le n_\infty\le1$ with $P_\infty$ supported on $\{n_\infty=1\}$; if the conclusions persist, the uniform high-integrability premise is not necessary, while if they fail the premise is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 2.2 is the central claim: under assumptions (H1)–(H3), for $m\ge\max\{2d+1,5\}$, the weak solutions $(n_m,c_m,u_m)$ constructed in Theorem 2.1 converge, up to subsequences, to a limit $(n_\infty,c_\infty,u_\infty,P_\infty,\Pi_\infty)$. The pressure $P_m=\frac{m}{m-1}n_m^{m-1}$ and the scaled density $n_m^m/m$ have the same weak limit $P_\infty$ in $L^2(0,T;H^1)$, and the limit satisfies the Hele-Shaw type system (2.6)–(2.7) together with the graph relations $0\le n_\infty\le1$, $(1-n_\infty)P_\infty=0$, and $(1-n_\infty)\nabla P_\infty=0$ almost everywhere. The complementarity relation $P_\infty(\Delta P_\infty-\nabla\cdot(\chi(c_\infty)\nabla c_\infty))=0$ holds distributionally; in the saturation region $\{n_\infty=1\}$, where the pressure is supported, this is a degenerate elliptic equation for the limiting pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The uniform-in-$m$ bounds on the initial cell density in $L^{m-1}$ and $L^{m+1}$ (assumptions (H2) and (H3)) are load-bearing, since these norms grow with $m$ and force the initial density to be essentially bounded by a constant independent of $m$, excluding genuinely unbounded or strongly concentrated initial data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Global weak solutions exist for the full chemotaxis–Navier–Stokes system in any dimension $d\ge2$ for every $m\ge3$, without the structural conditions (1.6) or (1.8) and without the spatial-weight assumption on $n_0$.
  • The Hele-Shaw limit is justified: as $m\to\infty$, $u_m\to u_\infty$ strongly in $L^2(0,T;L^2_{\mathrm{loc}})$ and $c_m\to c_\infty$ strongly in $L^2(0,T;W^{1,p}_{\mathrm{loc}})$, while the pressure converges weakly and $n_m$ converges in $\dot{H}^{-1}_{\mathrm{loc}}$.
  • The limiting cell density is saturated: $0\le n_\infty\le1$ almost everywhere, and the pressure $P_\infty$ is supported exactly on the set where $n_\infty=1$.
  • In the saturation region the pressure solves the degenerate elliptic equation $\Delta P_\infty=\nabla\cdot(\chi(c_\infty)\nabla c_\infty)$ where $P_\infty>0$.
  • If the initial cell mass is finite, the saturation region is bounded and the pressure is compactly supported, so the limit carries a genuine free boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not spelled out in the paper, the estimate $m\|(n_m-1)_+\|^2_{L^2}\le C$ implies an $O(m^{-1/2})$ $L^2$ decay rate for the positive part of $n_m-1$, which could be checked numerically.
  • Because the special test-function route to the complementarity relation bypasses the Aronson–Bénilan estimates and strong-gradient compactness used in earlier Keller–Segel Hele-Shaw proofs, the same mechanism may verify the complementarity relation in settings where strong compactness of $\nabla P_m$ is unavailable.
  • The proof uses only the porous-medium-type structure of the density equation, so it likely extends to chemotaxis-fluid systems with volume-filling effects, logistic growth, or more general chemotactic sensitivities; a concrete test would be the same limit with the reaction term $nf(c)$ replaced by $nf(c)+g(n)$.
  • The uniform bounds in (H3) grow with $m$, so the theorem as stated covers only essentially bounded initial cell densities; whether the Hele-Shaw limit holds for unbounded or concentrated data is a natural open extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Cauchy problem for a chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with porous-medium diffusion, ∂t n + u·∇n = Δn^m − ∇·(χ(c)n∇c), coupled to an oxygen equation and the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. It first proves global existence of weak solutions uniformly for m ≥ 3 under hypotheses (H1)-(H2), with estimates independent of m. It then establishes that as m → ∞ subsequences converge to a Hele-Shaw-type limit, consisting of the system (2.6), the graph relations 0 ≤ n∞ ≤ 1, (1−n∞)P∞ = 0, (1−n∞)∇P∞ = 0, and the complementarity relation P∞(ΔP∞ − ∇·(χ(c∞)∇c∞)) = 0 in the distributional sense. The proof is based on the pressure formulation P_m = (m/(m−1))n_m^{m−1}, uniform-in-m energy and compactness estimates, and a special test-function argument for the complementarity relation; Appendix A gives an alternative proof via strong compactness of ∇n_m^m.

Significance. If the result is accepted after revision, this is a significant contribution: it provides a uniform global-existence theorem for m ≥ 3 and the first rigorous Hele-Shaw/stiff-pressure limit for the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, including fluid convection and buoyancy effects. The proof is largely self-contained and is built from explicit, parameter-free estimates; no fitted constants or assumed limiting equations are used. The alternative proof of the complementarity relation in Appendix A is a useful consistency check. However, two technical defects, one in the proof of the third graph relation and one in the displayed pressure equation, need to be repaired. Both are local and do not undermine the overall strategy, so the central claim is conditionally supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.37)] The identity (4.37) is false as written: it asserts u∞·∇P∞ = ∇P∞, which is not justified by the preceding arguments, and the claimed weak convergence ∇P∞^{1+α} ⇀ ∇P∞ in L^{3/2}_loc as α → 0+ does not follow from the displayed line. Since this is the only step offered for the third Hele-Shaw graph relation (1−n∞)∇P∞ = 0, the proof of Theorem 2.2 has a genuine gap at this point. The gap is easily repaired: from (1−n∞)P∞ = 0 and P∞ ≥ 0, the set {n∞ < 1} is contained, up to null sets, in {P∞ = 0}; applying Stampacchia's lemma to P∞(t) ∈ H^1(R^d) gives ∇P∞ = 0 a.e. on {P∞ = 0}, and hence (1−n∞)∇P∞ = 0. The paragraph around (4.37) should be replaced by this direct argument.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (2.5)] Equation (2.5) has the wrong signs in the chemotaxis terms. Direct differentiation of P_m = (m/(m−1))n_m^{m−1} along (2.4) gives ∂tP_m + u_m·∇P_m = (m−1)P_m(ΔP_m − ∇·(χ(c_m)∇c_m)) + ∇P_m·(∇P_m − χ(c_m)∇c_m), not the formula with plus signs displayed in (2.5). This makes the formal derivation of the complementarity relation (2.9) inconsistent and should be corrected. The rigorous proof of Theorem 2.2 does not rely on (2.5), so this is a repairable error rather than a fatal flaw.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Assumptions (H2)-(H3)] The constants in (H2) and (H3) are required to be independent of m, which forces the initial densities n_{m,0} to be essentially bounded with a uniform bound; since the L^p norm converges to the L^∞ norm as p → ∞, concentrated or genuinely unbounded initial data are excluded. This is a scope restriction of Theorem 2.2 and should be stated explicitly, for example in Remark 2.2 or immediately after the assumptions.
  2. [Theorem 2.2, Eq. (2.10)] The weak-* convergence statement for n_m in L∞(0,T;L^q(R^d)) is stated for q ∈ [1,∞); for q = 1, the weak-* notation is nonstandard because L^1 is not the dual of a Banach space in the usual sense. The statement should restrict q to (1,∞), or the q = 1 case should be formulated separately, for instance as weak convergence of measures.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'Texting' instead of 'Testing' in Lemma 3.3 and inconsistent typesetting of n_m^m as 'nm m'; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the Hele-Shaw limit is derived from uniform-in-m a priori estimates and distributional limits, not from an assumed limiting system; the flawed identity (4.37) is a repairable proof gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central result (Theorem 2.2) is obtained by a forward derivation: uniform-in-m estimates in Proposition 4.1 imply the convergences (2.10), and the limiting system (2.6) is obtained by passing to the limit in the weak formulation of (2.4). No parameter is fitted and no limiting equation is assumed. The graph relations (2.8) are consequences of the estimate m||(n_m-1)_+||^2_{L^2(Q_T)} <= C and of the weak-strong product limit n_m^m/m = ((m-1)/m)n_m P_m -> n_infty P_infty, while the equality of the two H^1 limits Q_infty = P_infty is proved by two-sided inequalities. The complementarity relation (2.9) is derived by testing the already-established limit system (2.6)_1 with phi P_infty and using (2.8); this is a mathematical consequence of the limit system, not an input. The self-citations [22,23,25] provide methodological context from earlier Hele-Shaw proofs, but the present derivation does not import their conclusions as premises; the proof is self-contained once the stated a priori bounds are accepted. Two correctness caveats should be flagged, but neither is circular. First, identity (4.37) is false as written: the displayed chain 'u_infty · ∇P_infty^{1+alpha} = (1+alpha)P_infty^alpha u_infty · ∇P_infty = (1+alpha)P_infty^alpha · ∇P_infty = ∇P_infty^{1+alpha}' drops the vector u_infty and misplaces the scalar factors, and the claimed weak limit ∇P_infty^{1+alpha} -> ∇P_infty in L^{3/2}_{loc} as alpha -> 0+ does not follow from the preceding line. However, the third relation (1-n_infty)∇P_infty = 0 follows directly from (1-n_infty)P_infty = 0, P_infty >= 0, and P_infty in L^2(0,T;H^1) by Stampacchia's lemma, so the gap is locally repairable and independent of circularity. Second, the formal pressure equation (2.5) has a sign discrepancy with the rigorous derivation, but it is not used in the proof of Theorem 2.2. Finally, the uniform L^{m-1}/L^{m+1} initial bounds in (H2)-(H3) are explicit hypotheses, not conclusions; their failure would limit the theorem's scope rather than make the argument circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The central claim rests on the stated regularity assumptions on coefficients and initial data, standard functional analysis tools, and the technical restriction m≥max{2d+1,5}.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption χ, f ∈ W^{1,∞}(R+), f≥0, φ∈W^{1,∞}(R^d) (H1)
    Regularity and sign conditions on the chemotactic sensitivity, consumption rate, and potential; used throughout Sections 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption Initial data satisfy (H2): ∥n0∥_{L^{m−1}}, ∥c0∥_{H^1}, ∥u0∥_{L^2} uniformly bounded independent of m, plus L^1 bounds and c0≤cB
    Needed for the uniform energy estimates (Lemma 3.2) and the m-independent bounds in Theorem 2.1; the uniform L^{m−1} bound is effectively an L^∞ bound on n0.
  • domain assumption (H3): uniform L^{m+1} bound on n_{m,0}, Ḣ^{−1}(R^2) bound for d=2, and L^1/L^2 convergence of initial data
    Additional integrability and convergence needed for the Hele-Shaw limit (Lemma 4.3, Proposition 4.1).
  • ad hoc to paper m ≥ max{2d+1, 5}
    Technical lower bound on the diffusion exponent that makes the L^{m+1} and Sobolev embeddings work in the proofs of Lemma 4.3 and Lemma 4.4.
  • standard math Standard Sobolev, Gagliardo-Nirenberg, Aubin-Lions-Simon, Dubinskiï, and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities
    Used as black boxes for compactness and interpolation throughout.
  • standard math For H^1 functions, vanishing on a set implies the gradient vanishes a.e. on that set
    Would justify (1−n∞)∇P∞=0 from (1−n∞)P∞=0; the paper instead attempts an erroneous identity (4.37).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hele-Shaw limit of chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HT7DLZVF

@misc{pith2026250611757,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hele-Shaw limit of chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HT7DLZVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11757}
}
abstract

This paper investigates the connection between the chemotaxis--Navier--Stokes system with porous medium type nonlinear diffusion and the Hele--Shaw problem in $\mathbb{R}^d$ ($d\geq2$). First, we prove the global-in-time existence of weak solutions for the Cauchy problem of the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with the general initial data, uniformly in the diffusion range $m\in [3,\infty)$. Then, we rigorously justify the Hele--Shaw limit for this system as $m\rightarrow\infty$, showing the convergence to a free boundary problem of Hele--Shaw type, where the bacterium (cell) diffusion is governed by the stiff pressure law. Moreover, the complementarity relation characterizing the limiting bacterium (cell) pressure via a degenerate elliptic equation is verified by a novel application of the Hele--Shaw framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. Hittmeir, and A. Jüngel. Cross diffusion and nonlinear diffusion preventing blow up in the Keller-Segel model. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 22(12):1250041, 35, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y. Peng, and Z. Xiang. Global existence and decay rates to a self-consistent chemotaxis-fluid system. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 44(1), 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee. Existence of smooth solutions to coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 33(6):2271–2297, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee. Global existence and temporal decay in Keller-Segel models coupled to fluid equations. Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 39(7):1205–1235, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Craig, I

    K. Craig, I. Kim, and Y. Yao. Congested aggregation via Newtonian interaction.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 227(1):1–67, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    N. David. Phenotypic heterogeneity in a model of tumour growth: existence of solutions and incompressible limit. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 48(4):678–710, 2023. 32

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    David, T

    N. David, T. Dębiec, and B. Perthame. Convergence rate for the incompressible limit of nonlinear diffusion- advection equations. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Anal. Non Linéaire, 40(3):511–529, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    David, A

    N. David, A. R. Mészáros, and F. Santambrogio. Improved convergence rates for the Hele-Shaw limit in the presence of confining potentials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07227, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    David and B

    N. David and B. Perthame. Free boundary limit of a tumor growth model with nutrient.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 155:62–82, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    David and M

    N. David and M. Schmidtchen. On the incompressible limit for a tumour growth model incorporating convective effects.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 77(5):2613–2650, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Debiec, B

    T. Debiec, B. Perthame, M. Schmidtchen, and N. Vauchelet. Incompressible limit for a two-species model with coupling through Brinkman’s law in any dimension.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 145:204–239, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Debiec and M

    T. Debiec and M. Schmidtchen. Incompressible limit for a two-species tumour model with coupling through Brinkman’s law in one dimension.Acta Appl. Math., 169:593–611, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Di Francesco, A

    M. Di Francesco, A. Lorz, and P. Markowich. Chemotaxis-fluid coupled model for swimming bacteria with nonlinear diffusion: Global existence and asymptotic behavior.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 28(4):1437–1453, 2010

    2010

  6. [14]

    Dolbeault and G

    J. Dolbeault and G. Jankowiak. Sobolev and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities.J. Differential Equa- tions, 257(6):1689–1720, 2014

    2014

  7. [15]

    R. Duan, X. Li, and Z. Xiang. Global existence and large time behavior for a two-dimensional chemotaxis- Navier-Stokes system.J. Differential Equations, 263(10):6284–6316, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    R. Duan, A. Lorz, and P. Markowich. Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations.Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 35(9):1635–1673, 2010

    2010

  9. [17]

    Duan and Z

    R. Duan and Z. Xiang. A note on global existence for the chemotaxis–stokes model with nonlinear diffusion. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2014(7), 2012

    2014

  10. [18]

    Y. A. Dunbinskï. Weak convergence for nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations.Mat. Sb., 67(109):609–642, 1965

    1965

  11. [19]

    Y. Feng, Q. He, J.-G. Liu, and Z. Zhou. Rigorous derivation of a Hele-Shaw type model and its non-symmetric traveling wave solution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16353, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gilbarg and N

    D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger.Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Springer, Berlin, 1983

    1983

  13. [21]

    Guillen, I

    N. Guillen, I. Kim, and A. Mellet. A Hele-Shaw limit without monotonicity.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 243(2):829–868, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    He, H.-L

    Q. He, H.-L. Li, and B. Perthame. Incompressible limit of porous media equation with chemotaxis and growth. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16869, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    He, H.-L

    Q. He, H.-L. Li, and B. Perthame. Incompressible limits of the Patlak-Keller-Segel model and its stationary state. Acta Appl. Math., 188:Paper No. 11, 53, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    He, L.-Y

    Q. He, L.-Y. Shou, and L. Wu. Global dynamics for the generalized chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system inR3. To appear in Eur. J. Appl. Math., 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    He and M

    Q. He and M. Zhang. On the incompressible limit of Keller-Segel system with volume-filling effects.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05884, 2024. 33

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    S. He. Enhanced dissipation and blow-up suppression in a chemotaxis-fluid system.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55(4):2615–2643, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Z. Hu, A. Kiselev, and Y. Yao. Suppression of chemotactic singularity by buoyancy.Geometric and Functional Analysis, pages 1–30, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Kim and A

    I. Kim and A. Mellet. Incompressible limit of a porous media equation with bistable and monostable reaction term. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55(5):5318–5344, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    I. Kim, N. Požár, and B. Woodhouse. Singular limit of the porous medium equation with a drift.Adv. Math., 349:682–732, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Kim and O

    I. Kim and O. Turanova. Uniform convergence for the incompressible limit of a tumor growth model.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Anal. Non Linéaire, 35(5):1321–1354, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Kiselev and L

    A. Kiselev and L. Ryzhik. Global existence and stabilization in a degenerate chemotaxis-stokes system with mildly strong diffusion enhancement.Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 37:298–318, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Kiselev and X

    A. Kiselev and X. Xu. Suppression of chemotactic explosion by mixing. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 222:1077–1112, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    C.-C. Lai, J. Wei, and Y. Zhou. Global existence of free-energy solutions to the 2D Patlak-Keller-Segel- Navier-Stokes system with critical and subcritical mass.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 72:43–87, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Liu and A

    J.-G. Liu and A. Lorz. A coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: Global existence.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Anal. Non Linéaire, 28(5):643–652, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    Liu and X

    J.-G. Liu and X. Xu. Existence and incompressible limit of a tissue growth model with autophagy.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 53(5):5215–5242, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    A. Lorz. Coupled chemotaxis fluid equations.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 20:987–1004, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    A. Lorz. A coupled Keller-Segel–Stokes model: Global existence for small initial data and blow-up delay. Commun. Math. Sci., 10(2):555–574, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    Nirenberg

    L. Nirenberg. On elliptic partial differential equations.Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa CI. Sci., 13(2):115–162, 1959

    1959

  31. [39]

    Peng and Z

    Y. Peng and Z. Xiang. Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluids system in a 3D unbounded domain with boundary.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 28(5):869–920, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Peng and Z

    Y. Peng and Z. Xiang. Global existence and convergence rates to a chemotaxis-fluids system with mixed boundary conditions. J. Differential Equations, 267(2):1277–1321, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Perthame, F

    B. Perthame, F. Quirós, M. Tang, and N. Vauchelet. Derivation of a Hele-Shaw type system from a cell model with active motion.Interfaces Free Bound., 16(4):489–508, 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Perthame, F

    B. Perthame, F. Quirós, and J. L. Vázquez. The Hele-Shaw asymptotics for mechanical models of tumor growth. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 212(1):93–127, 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Perthame and N

    B. Perthame and N. Vauchelet. Incompressible limit of a mechanical model of tumour growth with viscosity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 373(2050):20140283, 16, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    J. Simon. Compact sets in the spaceLp(0, T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 146:65–96, 1987

    1987

  37. [45]

    Tao and M

    Y. Tao and M. Winkler. Global existence and boundedness in a Keller-Segel-Stokes model with arbitrary porous medium diffusion.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 32(5):1901–1914, 2012. 34

    1901

  38. [46]

    Tao and M

    Y. Tao and M. Winkler. Locally bounded global solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Anal. Non Linéaire, 30(1):157–178, 2013

    2013

  39. [47]

    Tong and Y

    J. Tong and Y. P. Zhang. Convergence of free boundaries in the incompressible limit of tumor growth models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05804, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Tuval, L

    I. Tuval, L. Cisneros, C. Dombrowski, C. W. Wolgemuth, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein. Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(7):2277–2282, 2005

    2005

  41. [49]

    M. Winkler. Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops.Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 37(2):319–351, 2012

    2012

  42. [50]

    M. Winkler. Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 211:455–487, 2014

    2014

  43. [51]

    M. Winkler. Boundedness and large time behavior in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion and general sensitivity.Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 54:3789–3828, 2015

    2015

  44. [52]

    M. Winkler. Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Anal. Non Linéaire, 33(5):1329–1352, 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    M. Winkler. How far do chemotaxis-driven forces influence regularity in the Navier-Stokes system?T. Amer. Math. Soc., 369(5):3067–3125, 2017

    2017

  46. [54]

    M. Winkler. Does Leray’s structure theorem withstand buoyancy-driven chemotaxis-fluid interaction?J. Eur. Math. Soc., 25:1423–1456, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    L. Zeng, Z. Zhang, and R. Zi. Suppression of blow-up in Patlak-Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system via the Couette flow.J. Funct. Anal., 280:108967, 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Zhang and Y

    Q. Zhang and Y. Li. Convergence rates of solutions for a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier–Stokes system. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B, 20:2751–2759, 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    Zhang and X

    Q. Zhang and X. Zheng. Global well-posedness for the two-dimensional incompressible chemotaxis-Navier- Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 46(4):3078–3105, 2014. 35 (Q. He) Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75005 Paris, France. Email address: qin...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.