pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05429 · v2 · pith:HVRI7DVEnew · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Multiwavelength Analysis of PSR J0437-4715 with Pulse Profile Modeling

Liqiang Qi , Juan Zhang , Weiwei Xu , Shijie Zheng , Mingyu Ge , Ang Li , Shuang-Nan Zhang , Hua Feng
show 1 more author
Fangjun Lu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 22:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords PSR J0437-4715millisecond pulsarneutron star radiuspulse profile modelingmulti-wavelength analysismass-radius relationX-ray observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Joint multi-wavelength modeling of PSR J0437-4715 with radio-informed priors gives mass 1.38 solar masses and radius 13.25 km.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper combines far-ultraviolet HST data, soft X-ray ROSAT data, and X-ray XMM-Newton data to model the broadband emission and energy-resolved pulse profiles of the millisecond pulsar PSR J0437-4715. It employs pulse profile modeling for the hot spots while using an informative prior on hot-spot geometry drawn from radio polarization position angle measurements. A sympathetic reader would care because precise neutron star mass and radius values constrain the equation of state of ultra-dense matter. The analysis produces a statistically viable solution that is consistent with radio observations and yields tighter radius constraints than earlier fits.

Core claim

The central claim is that the joint multi-instrument Bayesian analysis, incorporating an informative prior on hot-spot geometry from radio data, produces a radio-consistent solution with gravitational mass 1.38 ± 0.03 solar masses and equatorial circumferential radius 13.25 km with uncertainties of +0.34 and -0.35 km at 68 percent . The hot-spot geometry consists of two uniform-temperature spherical caps, with the primary at colatitude approximately 130 degrees and the secondary at approximately 9 degrees near the north pole. This approach shifts the radius posterior to larger values relative to NICER-only fits and demonstrates the value of multi-wavelength data for resolving geometric model

What carries the argument

Bayesian joint inference of cold thermal emission from a non-magnetized partially-ionized hydrogen atmosphere, hot-spot emission from a non-magnetized fully-ionized hydrogen atmosphere via pulse profile modeling, and a phase-invariant power-law non-thermal component, with hot-spot geometry constrained by an informative prior from radio polarization measurements.

If this is right

  • Yields tighter radius constraints than fits using only HST and ROSAT data.
  • Shifts the radius posterior distribution to larger values compared with NICER-only analyses.
  • Establishes a two-hot-spot geometry with primary cap at colatitude approximately 130 degrees and secondary at approximately 9 degrees.
  • Shows that multi-wavelength data combined with radio priors can resolve geometric degeneracies in neutron star modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported mass-radius pair supplies a concrete test point for nuclear equation-of-state calculations at high density.
  • Extending the same multi-instrument plus radio-prior method to other nearby pulsars could produce a useful sample of precise measurements.
  • The two-cap hot-spot configuration may inform models of magnetic field evolution in recycled millisecond pulsars.

Load-bearing premise

The non-magnetized hydrogen atmosphere models for the bulk surface and hot spots accurately capture radiative transfer and beaming without significant magnetic field effects.

What would settle it

An independent observation that places the equatorial radius of PSR J0437-4715 outside the interval 12.9 to 13.6 km or finds hot-spot colatitudes inconsistent with the radio polarization angles would contradict the reported solution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05429 by Ang Li, Fangjun Lu, Hua Feng, Juan Zhang, Liqiang Qi, Mingyu Ge, Shijie Zheng, Shuang-Nan Zhang, Weiwei Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalized energy-integrated pulse profiles of PSR J0437–4715 in the 0.3-3.0 keV band, extracted from XMM-Newton EPIC-pn (16 phase bins) and NICER data (32 phase bins; upper panel). Energy-resolved pulse profiles from XMM-Newton EPIC￾pn data, spanning 0.3-3.0 keV with 16 phase bins and 135 energy channels (lower panel). Two rotational cycles are plotted for clarity. 2.2. ROSAT The ROSAT PSPC observations (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The joint spectral fit is conditional on informative tight priors for the neutron star mass and distance from high￾precision radio pulsar timing measurements (Reardon et al. 2024); the neutron star mass is assigned a Gaussian prior Probability Density Function (PDF), and the distance is fixed 2 https://aphysics2.lanl.gov − − −       view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The inferred radius posteriors exhibit an adjacent yet disjoint distribution at lower radii, which cannot be re￾solved by MultiNest’s default separation algorithm. They are in good agreement with the result of Gonz´alez-Caniulef et al. (2019) (R = 13.1+0.9 −0.7 km), demonstrating a proper implemen￾tation of the hydrogen atmosphere modeling and Bayesian parameter estimation. In this section, the contributio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional marginalized posterior PDFs of neutron star mass and radius from the NICER-only fit. Results are com￾pared to the headline measurements of Choudhury et al. (2024a). The contours represent the 68% and 95% credible regions view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of the two circular hot-spot ge￾ometry inferred from the best-fit parameters of the second posterior mode. The primary hot spot is shown in red, and the secondary hot spot in blue. The observer’s line of sight is indicated by the black line, corresponding to a colatitude of 137.5 ◦ . Exact geometric pa￾rameters are listed in view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: , 8, and 9. No apparent structure is present, suggest￾ing that the model can reproduce the data. In the left panel of view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two-dimensional marginalized posterior PDFs of neutron star mass and radius, comparing results from different datasets and fitting methodologies employed in this work. The contours repre￾sent the 68% and 95% credible regions. To assess the fit quality of the headline model, residual dis￾tributions calculated using the best-fit values are presented in view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left panel: Comparison of total energy spectra and fit residuals between XMM-Newton EPIC-pn data and the best￾fit multi-component model. Right panel: Comparison of energy￾integrated pulse profiles between XMM-Newton EPIC-pn data and the best-fit model. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Phase Energy (keV) χ view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fit residuals of energy-resolved pulse profiles between XMM-Newton EPIC-pn data and the best-fit model. low signal-to-noise ratio of the high-energy tail leads to an inferred non-thermal power-law spectrum that is softer than that derived from NuSTAR data. Third, the exclusion of pul￾sations in the non-thermal emission may introduce additional biases. Finally, tighter constraints on hot-spot geometry are r… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a multi-wavelength analysis of the nearby millisecond pulsar PSR J0437--4715, combining Hubble Space Telescope (HST) far-ultraviolet, ROSAT soft X-ray, and XMM-Newton X-ray data, to model its broadband emission and energy-resolved pulse profiles, and infer key stellar parameters via Bayesian inference. The broadband emission includes cold thermal, hot thermal, and non-thermal components: cold bulk surface emission is modeled with a non-magnetized partially-ionized hydrogen atmosphere; hot-spot emission adopts the pulse profile modeling technique with a non-magnetized fully-ionized hydrogen atmosphere model; and non-thermal emission is included as a phase-invariant power-law component. By adopting an informative prior on the hot-spot geometry informed by radio polarization position angle measurements, the joint multi-instrument analysis yields a statistically viable and radio-consistent solution with a gravitational mass of 1.38$\pm$0.03~M$_\odot$ and an equatorial circumferential radius of 13.25$_{-0.35}^{+0.34}$~km (68\% confidence intervals). The hot-spot geometry consists of two spherical caps with uniform temperature distributions: the primary hot spot is situated at a colatitude of $\approx$130$^{\circ}$, and the secondary hot spot lies at a colatitude of $\approx$9$^{\circ}$, close to the north pole. It yields tighter radius constraints than HST+ROSAT fits and shifts the radius posterior distribution to larger values relative to NICER-only fits. This work demonstrates the importance of multi-wavelength data in refining neutron star mass-radius measurements and resolving geometric degeneracies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Bayesian multi-wavelength pulse-profile analysis of the millisecond pulsar PSR J0437-4715. It combines HST far-UV, ROSAT soft X-ray, and XMM-Newton X-ray data to model broadband emission consisting of cold bulk-surface thermal radiation (non-magnetized partially ionized hydrogen atmosphere), hot-spot thermal radiation (non-magnetized fully ionized hydrogen atmosphere for two spherical-cap hot spots), and a phase-invariant non-thermal power-law component. An informative prior on hot-spot colatitudes is taken from radio polarization position-angle measurements. The joint fit yields a gravitational mass of 1.38 ± 0.03 M_⊙ and equatorial circumferential radius 13.25_{-0.35}^{+0.34} km (68 % credible intervals), with the primary hot spot at colatitude ≈130° and the secondary at ≈9°.

Significance. If the atmosphere-model assumptions hold, the work demonstrates that combining multi-instrument light curves with an independent radio geometric prior can tighten radius constraints and shift the posterior relative to single-instrument analyses. The explicit use of radio polarization data to inform the hot-spot geometry is a clear strength, as is the joint likelihood across HST/ROSAT/XMM data. The result supplies a useful cross-check on other radius determinations for this pulsar and illustrates the value of multi-wavelength approaches for breaking geometric degeneracies in neutron-star parameter inference.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hot-spot atmosphere modeling] Hot-spot modeling description: the manuscript adopts a non-magnetized fully-ionized hydrogen atmosphere for the two spherical-cap hot spots without any quantification or sensitivity test of how magnetic-field-induced changes in opacity, polarization, or angular beaming would propagate into the joint HST/ROSAT/XMM likelihood or the final radius posterior. Because the reported M = 1.38 ± 0.03 M_⊙ and R = 13.25 km values are obtained directly from fitting the energy-resolved pulse profiles with this model, the unexamined assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Prior construction and application] Prior application section: although the radio polarization prior is described as supplying independent geometric information, the manuscript does not present a direct comparison of the posterior with and without the prior to demonstrate that the colatitudes (≈130° and ≈9°) and the resulting radius are refined rather than dominated by the prior alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] Abstract and §4: the asymmetric radius uncertainty is written as 13.25_{-0.35}^{+0.34} km; ensure identical notation and rounding are used consistently in all tables and figure captions.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: several panels showing model light curves versus data would benefit from explicit labels indicating which instrument and energy band each curve corresponds to.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and detailed review of our manuscript on the multi-wavelength analysis of PSR J0437-4715. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below, indicating where we plan to revise the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hot-spot atmosphere modeling] Hot-spot modeling description: the manuscript adopts a non-magnetized fully-ionized hydrogen atmosphere for the two spherical-cap hot spots without any quantification or sensitivity test of how magnetic-field-induced changes in opacity, polarization, or angular beaming would propagate into the joint HST/ROSAT/XMM likelihood or the final radius posterior. Because the reported M = 1.38 ± 0.03 M_⊙ and R = 13.25 km values are obtained directly from fitting the energy-resolved pulse profiles with this model, the unexamined assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We recognize that the lack of a sensitivity test for magnetic field effects on the hot-spot atmosphere is a valid concern, as the non-magnetized assumption is central to our modeling. For this millisecond pulsar, the magnetic field is weak, but to strengthen the manuscript, we will add a section discussing the potential impacts based on prior studies of magnetized neutron star atmospheres and include a basic sensitivity analysis by varying key parameters such as beaming patterns within reasonable bounds. This revision will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Prior construction and application] Prior application section: although the radio polarization prior is described as supplying independent geometric information, the manuscript does not present a direct comparison of the posterior with and without the prior to demonstrate that the colatitudes (≈130° and ≈9°) and the resulting radius are refined rather than dominated by the prior alone.

    Authors: We agree that presenting a direct comparison would better illustrate the influence of the radio prior. We will revise the manuscript to include results from an additional run without the informative prior on the hot-spot colatitudes. This will allow us to show the differences in the posterior distributions for the colatitudes and the radius, confirming that the prior provides refinement rather than domination. The updated analysis will be added to the results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct fit to external multi-wavelength data

full rationale

The paper's central mass-radius result is obtained via Bayesian fitting of observed HST/ROSAT/XMM pulse profiles and spectra using standard non-magnetized hydrogen atmosphere models for the bulk surface and hot spots, plus a phase-invariant power-law. The informative prior on hot-spot colatitudes is taken from independent radio polarization position-angle data, which supplies external geometric information rather than being derived from the X-ray/UV likelihood. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors; the geometry is not self-defined, the M-R posterior is not a renamed known result, and the modeling assumptions are stated explicitly without uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own previous papers. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard neutron-star atmosphere models drawn from prior literature, an informative radio prior treated as external, and several fitted parameters for geometry and temperatures; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • primary hot-spot colatitude
    Fitted parameter with radio-informed prior; central value approximately 130 degrees.
  • secondary hot-spot colatitude
    Fitted parameter with radio-informed prior; central value approximately 9 degrees.
  • hot-spot temperatures and sizes
    Multiple thermal and geometric parameters adjusted to match the observed pulse profiles.
  • non-thermal power-law index and normalization
    Phase-invariant component parameters fitted to the broadband spectrum.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Non-magnetized partially and fully ionized hydrogen atmosphere models correctly predict the specific intensity and beaming as a function of angle and energy.
    Invoked for both bulk surface and hot-spot emission components.
  • domain assumption The radio polarization position angle directly informs the X-ray hot-spot geometry without significant offset.
    Used to construct the informative prior on colatitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5856 in / 1647 out tokens · 78305 ms · 2026-05-20T22:56:14.445856+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 187, 460, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/460

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/460 2010

  2. [2]

    AlGendy, M., & Morsink, S. M. 2014, The Astrophysical Journa l, 791, 78 13

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    1999, XSPEC: An X-ray spectral fitting package, Astrophysics Source Code Library , record ascl:9910.005

    Arnaud, K., Dorman, B., & Gordon, C. 1999, XSPEC: An X-ray spectral fitting package, Astrophysics Source Code Library , record ascl:9910.005. http://ascl.net/9910.005

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Bhat, N. D. R., Ord, S. M., Tremblay, S. E., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 791, L32, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/791/2/L32

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/791/2/l32 2014

  5. [5]

    V ., Watts, A

    Bilous, A. V ., Watts, A. L., Harding, A. K., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L23

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 762, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/96

    Bogdanov, S. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 762, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/96

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/96 2012

  7. [7]

    K., Mahmoodifar, S., et al

    Bogdanov, S., Lamb, F. K., Mahmoodifar, S., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L26

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    M., Leahy, D., & Campbell, S

    Cadeau, C., Morsink, S. M., Leahy, D., & Campbell, S. S. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 654, 458

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 52 0, 3151

    Carrasco, F., Pelle, J., Reula, O., Vigan` o, D., & Palenzuela, C. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 52 0, 3151

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Y ., Y uan, Y ., & V asilopoulos, G

    Chen, A. Y ., Y uan, Y ., & V asilopoulos, G. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 893, L38

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    2024b, Reproduction package for: ’A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715’, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.10886504

    Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., Serena, V ., et al. 2024b, Reproduction package for: ’A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715’, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.10886504

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10886504

  12. [12]

    C., Wolff, M

    Clayton, G. C., Wolff, M. J., Sofia, U. J., Gordon, K. D., & Miss elt, K. A. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 588, 871, doi: 10.1086/374316

    work page doi:10.1086/374316 2003

  13. [13]

    J., Miller, M

    Dittmann, A. J., Miller, M. C., Lamb, F. K., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 295

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    G., et al

    Durant, M., Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 746, 6, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/6

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/1/6 2012

  15. [15]

    2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1601

    Feroz, F., Hobson, M., & Bridges, M. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1601

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    L., & Massa, D

    Fitzpatrick, E. L., & Massa, D. 1990, ApJS, 72, 163, doi: 10.1086/191413

    work page doi:10.1086/191413 1990

  17. [17]

    C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P

    Gendreau, K. C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P . W., et al. 2016, in Space telescopes and instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray, V ol. 9905, SPIE, 420–435 Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Guillot, S., & Reisenegger, A. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 584 8, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2941

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2941 2016

  18. [18]

    M., Archibald, R

    Guillot, S., Kaspi, V . M., Archibald, R. F., et al. 2016, Mont hly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 463, 2612, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2194

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2194 2016

  19. [19]

    2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L1

    Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L1

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 530, 4839, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1175

    Karastergiou, A. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 530, 4839, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1175 2024

  21. [21]

    K., & Kazan as, D

    Kalapotharakos, C., Wadiasingh, Z., Harding, A. K., & Kazan as, D. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 907, 63

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    2018, A& A, 616, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832832

    Lallement, R., Capitanio, L., Ruiz-Dern, L., et al. 2018, A& A, 616, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832832

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832832 2018

  23. [23]

    2001, The Astrophysical Journal , 550, 426

    Lattimer, J., & Prakash, M. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal , 550, 426

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    L., Zhang, G., et al

    Li, A., Watts, A. L., Zhang, G., et al. 2025, Science China Phy sics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68, 119503, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4 2025

  25. [25]

    E., ¨Ozel, F., & Psaltis, D

    Lockhart, W., Gralla, S. E., ¨Ozel, F., & Psaltis, D. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 1774, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2524

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2524 2019

  26. [26]

    N., & Johnston, S

    Manchester, R. N., & Johnston, S. 1995, ApJL, 441, L65, doi: 10.1086/187791

    work page doi:10.1086/187791 1995

  27. [27]

    2025, The Astrop hysical Journal, 995, 60

    Mauviard, L., Guillot, S., Salmi, T., et al. 2025, The Astrop hysical Journal, 995, 60

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    2024, Physical Review D, 109, 123005

    Miao, Z., Qi, L., Zhang, J., Li, A., & Ge, M. 2024, Physical Review D, 109, 123005

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    1978, Stellar atmospheres

    Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar atmospheres

    work page 1978

  30. [30]

    K., Dittmann, A., et al

    Miller, M., Lamb, F. K., Dittmann, A., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L24

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    C., Lamb, F., Dittmann, A., et al

    Miller, M. C., Lamb, F., Dittmann, A., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918, L28

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    M., Leahy, D

    Morsink, S. M., Leahy, D. A., Cadeau, C., & Braga, J. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 663, 1244 N¨ attil¨ a, J., & Pihajoki, P . 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, A50

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    L., & Kunasz, P

    Olson, G. L., & Kunasz, P . 1987, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 38, 325, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(87)90027-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4073(87)90027-6 1987

  34. [34]

    1997, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 490, L91

    Pavlov, G., & Zavlin, V . 1997, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 490, L91

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Perera, B. B. P ., DeCesar, M. E., Demorest, P . B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2857 P´ etri, J., Stammler, P ., Guillemot, L., et al. 2026, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10536

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2857 2019

  36. [36]

    Poutanen, J., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2006, Monthly Notices of t he Royal Astronomical Society, 373, 836

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 343, 1301

    Poutanen, J., & Gierli´ nski, M. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 343, 1301

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    2025, The Astrophysical J ournal, 981, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb42f

    Qi, L., Zheng, S., Zhang, J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical J ournal, 981, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb42f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb42f 2025

  39. [39]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918, L29

    Raaijmakers, G., Greif, S., Hebeler, K., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918, L29

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    J., Bailes, M., Shannon, R

    Reardon, D. J., Bailes, M., Shannon, R. M., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 971, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad614a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad614a 2024

  41. [41]

    E., Watts, A

    Riley, T. E., Watts, A. L., Bogdanov, S., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L21 14

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    E., Watts, A

    Riley, T. E., Watts, A. L., Ray, P . S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918, L27

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    E., Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., et al

    Riley, T. E., Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., et al. 2023, Journal o f Open Source Software, 8

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 941, 150 —

    Salmi, T., Vinciguerra, S., Choudhury, D., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 941, 150 —. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 956, 138

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    The Radius of the High Mass Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 With 3.6 Years of NICER Data,

    Salmi, T., Choudhury, D., Kini, Y ., et al. 2024a, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14466

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    S., Ray, P

    Salmi, T., Deneva, J. S., Ray, P . S., et al. 2024b, The Astrophysical Journal, 976, 58 Str¨ uder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L18 Tr¨ umper, J. 1982, Advances in Space Research, 2, 241, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(82)90070-9 V ergely, J. L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, A&A, 664, A174, doi: 1...

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(82)90070-9 2001

  47. [47]

    L., et al

    Vinciguerra, S., Salmi, T., Watts, A. L., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 961, 62

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    L., Andersson, N., Chakrabarty, D., et al

    Watts, A. L., Andersson, N., Chakrabarty, D., et al. 2016, Re views of Modern Physics, 88, 021001

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    L., Salmi, T., Choudhury, D., et al

    Watts, A. L., Salmi, T., Choudhury, D., et al. 2022, Auxiliar y files for X-PSI tutorials, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.7094144

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7094144 2022

  50. [50]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, 914

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, 914

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    1998, Astron

    Zavlin, V ., & Pavlov, G. 1998, Astron. Astrophy, 329, 583

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    2025, Science Ch ina

    Zhang, S.-N., Santangelo, A., Xu, Y ., et al. 2025, Science Ch ina

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68, 119502, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6

  54. [54]

    2024, Universe, 10, 174, doi: 10.3390/universe10040174

    Zheng, S., Han, D., Xu, H., et al. 2024, Universe, 10, 174, doi: 10.3390/universe10040174

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10040174 2024