Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robustifying Approximate Bayesian Computation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.04733 v1 pith:HVSOSPDX submitted 2025-04-07 stat.ME stat.CO

classification stat.MEstat.CO
keywords modelapproachbayesianmethodsmisspecificationaccurateapproachesapproximate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is one of the most popular "likelihood-free" methods. These methods have been applied in a wide range of fields by providing solutions to intractable likelihood problems in which exact Bayesian approaches are either infeasible or computationally costly. However, the performance of ABC can be unreliable when dealing with model misspecification. To circumvent the poor behavior of ABC in these settings, we propose a novel ABC approach that is robust to model misspecification. This new method can deliver more accurate statistical inference under model misspecification than alternatives and also enables the detection of summary statistics that are incompatible with the assumed data-generating process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through several simulated examples, where it delivers more accurate point estimates and uncertainty quantification over standard ABC approaches when the model is misspecified. Additionally, we apply our approach to an empirical example, further showcasing its advantages over alternative methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools