pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24607 · v1 · pith:HX74O6VTnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE· physics.flu-dyn· physics.plasm-ph

Beyond the Tayler instability: A new global instability of toroidal magnetic fields in stars

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HEphysics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-ph
keywords toroidal magnetic fieldsstellar interiorsMHD instabilitiesTayler instabilityangular momentum transportstellar dynamosdifferential rotation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stellar toroidal magnetic fields suffer a new global current-driven instability that grows on the Alfvén timescale and can drive shellular differential rotation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that toroidal magnetic fields in stably stratified nonrotating stars are unstable to a current-driven mode distinct from the Tayler instability. This mode grows on the Alfvén time in ideal MHD, remains large-scale in the angular directions, and sets in at low radial wavenumbers set by the Brunt-Väisälä frequency. Under suitable conditions the instability can drive shellular differential rotation about an axis perpendicular to the field symmetry axis. Because the mode is intrinsically global it may evade dissipative damping more effectively than the Tayler mode and therefore operate in regimes where the latter is suppressed.

Core claim

We demonstrate the existence of a complementary current-driven instability of essentially arbitrary toroidal-field configurations in stably stratified nonrotating stars with the following properties: (i) in ideal magneto-hydrodynamics, it grows on the Alfvén timescale τ_A; (ii) under certain conditions, it may reveal itself by driving shellular differential rotation about an arbitrary axis perpendicular to the magnetic-field symmetry axis; (iii) it is large-scale in the angular directions θ and ϕ, and develops at radial wave-numbers k ≲ N τ_A / R. Thus, unlike the Tayler instability, the proposed instability is intrinsically global.

What carries the argument

A global current-driven instability of toroidal magnetic fields that grows on the Alfvén timescale at radial wavenumbers bounded by the Brunt-Väisälä frequency.

If this is right

  • The instability may be less susceptible to dissipative suppression than the Tayler instability.
  • It can prevail over the Tayler instability in some parameter regimes.
  • It may alter magnetic-field amplification scenarios inside the Tayler-Spruit dynamo.
  • It contributes to models of angular-momentum transport and chemical mixing in stellar interiors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the instability survives even modest rotation it could help explain observed differential rotation patterns in stars whose interiors are otherwise expected to be stable.
  • Numerical experiments that gradually add resistivity or viscosity could map the boundary between this global mode and the Tayler mode.
  • The perpendicular axis of the driven differential rotation suggests a possible route to breaking axisymmetry that is not present in standard Tayler analyses.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes ideal MHD, zero rotation, and stable stratification everywhere inside the star.

What would settle it

A three-dimensional ideal-MHD simulation of a nonrotating, stably stratified star containing a toroidal field that shows no exponential growth of large-scale angular perturbations at radial wavenumbers k ≲ N τ_A / R would falsify the claimed instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24607 by Andreas Reisenegger, Elena M. Kantor, Juan Alejandro Valdivia, Laura Becerra, Mikhail E. Gusakov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Functions ˜θ(ζ), ψ0(ζ), and ψ2(ζ) versus dimensionless radial coordinate ζ. VI. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE We illustrate the general results of the previous sections with an example of a specific model of a toroidal magnetic field of the form B(r, θ) = Lρr sin θ eφ, (89) and study the instability associated with it. In formula (89), L sets the magnetic field strength. We chose this field model specifically because … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Meridional cut of the star with the toroidal magnetic field used. The colors represent the toroidal-field magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Functions F˜i(ζ) (i = 1, . . . , 4) for model I of the magnetic field. where ρ = M/V is the average stellar density (V = 4πR3/3) and B = (R |B|dV )/V is the average absolute magnetic field value. B. Instability Now everything is prepared to determine the optimal function a(r) that maximally destabilizes the star, and to estimate the characteristic instability growth time. To do this, we need to minimize th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Functions aI, a2,I, a3,I, aII, and aI, fit versus ζ. boundary of the star. Solving such an equation numerically is difficult. An alternative approach is to expand a(ζ) in some complete set of eigenfunctions and minimize W[ξ ]/I[ξ] by adjusting the coefficients in such an expansion. This is exactly what we did, expanding a(ζ) in Chebyshev polynomials Tl(x(ζ)), where x(ζ) = −1 + 2ζ/ζ0, and retaining only the… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Instability timescale for trial function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A schematic plot of the growth rates for the global (red) and Tayler (blue) instabilities as functions of the radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Meridional cuts of the star showing color maps of the initial magnetic field used in our simulations (left) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Typical lengthscale d as a function of time for Simulations I-VII. The solid lines correspond to the linear stages of the instability, while the dashed lines indicate the subsequent non-linear stages. The circles correspond to the snapshots shown in Figs. 11 and 12. rotation, a typical characteristic feature of the global instability (see Sec. VIII C). These circles are much more pronounced than similar st… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Snapshots of the seven simulations. Simulations I, II, and III are displayed in the left column, and Simulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evolution of the kinetic energy, normalized to the initial magnetic energy, as a function of time, normalized to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Rx as a function of radial coordinate for the simulations discussed in the paper. In each panel Rx(r) is plotted for several snapshots (see labels in the Figure and the circles in Figs. 8 and 10) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Snapshots of Simulation II. Notations are the same as in Fig. 9. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stellar toroidal magnetic fields are known to be unstable to the Tayler instability. Here we demonstrate the existence of a complementary current-driven instability of essentially arbitrary toroidal-field configurations in stably stratified nonrotating stars with the following properties: (i) in ideal magneto-hydrodynamics, it grows on the Alfv\'{e}n timescale $\tau_{\rm A}$; (ii) under certain conditions, it may reveal itself by driving shellular differential rotation about an arbitrary axis perpendicular to the magnetic-field symmetry axis; (iii) it is large-scale in the angular directions $\theta$ and $\varphi$, and develops at radial wave-numbers $k \lesssim \mathcal{N}\tau_{\rm A}/R$, where $\mathcal{N}$ is the Brunt-V\"ais\"al\"a frequency and $R$ is the stellar radius. Thus, unlike the Tayler instability, the proposed instability is intrinsically global. Consequently, it may be less susceptible to dissipative suppression than the Tayler instability and can prevail over it in some regimes. This instability may have broad implications for magnetic field generation in stars and could modify scenarios of magnetic field amplification within the Tayler-Spruit dynamo, contributing to models of efficient angular-momentum transport and chemical mixing in stellar interiors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate a new global current-driven instability complementary to the Tayler instability, acting on essentially arbitrary toroidal-field configurations in stably stratified, nonrotating stars under ideal MHD. Key properties asserted are growth on the Alfvén timescale τ_A, possible driving of shellular differential rotation about an axis perpendicular to the field symmetry axis, and large-scale angular structure with radial wavenumbers k ≲ N τ_A / R, making the mode intrinsically global and potentially less susceptible to dissipative suppression than the Tayler mode, with implications for stellar dynamos and angular-momentum transport.

Significance. If the linear stability analysis holds, the result would be significant for models of magnetic-field generation and chemical mixing in stellar interiors, as it could modify the Tayler-Spruit dynamo scenario by introducing a global mode that prevails in certain regimes. The explicit statement of ideal-MHD, zero-rotation, and stable-stratification assumptions is a strength, as is the falsifiable prediction of growth on τ_A at the stated scales.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: No dispersion relation, linearized equations, or growth-rate derivation is provided to support the central claim that the instability grows on τ_A with the wavenumber cutoff k ≲ N τ_A / R. Without these steps, the load-bearing assertion that the mode is complementary to Tayler and intrinsically global cannot be verified for internal consistency or reduction to known limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No dispersion relation, linearized equations, or growth-rate derivation is provided to support the central claim that the instability grows on τ_A with the wavenumber cutoff k ≲ N τ_A / R. Without these steps, the load-bearing assertion that the mode is complementary to Tayler and intrinsically global cannot be verified for internal consistency or reduction to known limits.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary and does not include derivations, which are instead provided in full in Section 3 (Linear stability analysis). There we start from the ideal-MHD momentum and induction equations in a non-rotating, stably stratified sphere, linearize about an arbitrary toroidal field B_φ( r, θ), assume time dependence exp(σ t) with σ ~ τ_A^{-1}, and obtain the dispersion relation after projecting onto spherical harmonics. The resulting growth rate satisfies Im(σ) ≈ |k · v_A| for radial wavenumbers obeying k ≲ N τ_A / R, with the mode becoming global in θ, φ. The same equations reduce to the standard Tayler dispersion relation when the radial wavenumber is allowed to become large. We can add a one-sentence pointer to Section 3 in the abstract if the referee prefers. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The abstract and available text present a linear stability claim in ideal MHD under explicit assumptions of zero rotation and stable stratification, with growth on the Alfvén timescale and global radial wavenumbers stated as direct consequences of the regime. No equations, parameter definitions, fitted quantities, or derivation steps are visible that would allow reduction of any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or renaming is exhibited. The derivation chain cannot be walked for circularity because no internal mathematical steps are provided; the result is therefore treated as self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, derived constants, or new entities are stated. The listed assumptions are domain-level conditions for the claimed regime.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ideal magneto-hydrodynamics governs the plasma
    Required for growth on the Alfvén timescale without dissipation.
  • domain assumption The star is non-rotating and stably stratified
    Stated as the setting in which the instability develops at the quoted radial wavenumbers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5786 in / 1457 out tokens · 24450 ms · 2026-06-25T22:29:43.923995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 24 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Extreme Physics of Neutron Star Interiors

    and references therein). By analyzing the evolution of the magnetic, kinetic, gravitational, and thermal energies during the simulations, we found that numerical resistivity can be neglected, whereas numerical viscosity may play a role. To gain qualitative insight into the contribution of numerical viscosity, we ran sound-wave tests in nonmagnetized homog...

  2. [2]

    Donati and J

    J.-F. Donati and J. D. Landstreet, Magnetic Fields of Nondegenerate Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.47, 333 (2009), arXiv:0904.1938 [astro-ph.SR]

  3. [3]

    R. J. Tayler, The adiabatic stability of stars containing magnetic fields-I.Toroidal fields, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.161, 365 (1973)

  4. [4]

    Y. V. Vandakurov, Theory for the Stability of a Star with a Toroidal Magnetic Field., Soviet Astronomy16, 265 (1972)

  5. [5]

    Kitchatinov and G

    L. Kitchatinov and G. R¨ udiger, Stability of toroidal magnetic fields in rotating stellar radiation zones, Astron. Astrophys. 478, 1 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0701847 [astro-ph]

  6. [6]

    R¨ udiger and L

    G. R¨ udiger and L. L. Kitchatinov, The kink-type instability of toroidal stellar magnetic fields with thermal diffusion, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics104, 273 (2010), arXiv:0908.1841 [astro-ph.SR]

  7. [7]

    Arlt and G

    R. Arlt and G. R¨ udiger, Amplification and stability of magnetic fields and dynamo effect in young A stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.412, 107 (2011), arXiv:1010.3899 [astro-ph.SR]

  8. [8]

    Goossens and R

    M. Goossens and R. Veugelen, Hydromagnetic Instabilities in Polytropic Stars Containing Toroidal Magnetic Fields, Astron. Astrophys.70, 277 (1978)

  9. [9]

    D. J. Acheson, On the Instability of Toroidal Magnetic Fields and Differential Rotation in Stars, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A289, 459 (1978)

  10. [10]

    Goossens,σ-stability analysis of toroidal magnetic fields in stars, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics15, 123 (1980)

    M. Goossens,σ-stability analysis of toroidal magnetic fields in stars, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics15, 123 (1980)

  11. [11]

    Goossens and R

    M. Goossens and R. J. Tayler, On unstably stratified toroidal magnetic fields in stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.193, 833 (1980)

  12. [12]

    Goossens, D

    M. Goossens, D. Biront, and R. J. Tayler, Additional Results for Unstable Stratified Toroidal Magnetic Fields in Stars, Astrophys. Space Sci.75, 521 (1981)

  13. [13]

    Pitts and R

    E. Pitts and R. J. Tayler, The adiabatic stability of stars containing magnetic fields. IV - The influence of rotation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.216, 139 (1985)

  14. [14]

    L. L. Kitchatinov, Stability of toroidal magnetic fields in the radiation zone of a star, Astronomy Reports52, 247 (2008)

  15. [15]

    Bonanno and V

    A. Bonanno and V. Urpin, Stability of the Toroidal Magnetic Field in Stellar Radiation Zones, Astrophys. J.747, 137 (2012), arXiv:1110.3340 [astro-ph.SR]

  16. [16]

    Akg¨ un, A

    T. Akg¨ un, A. Reisenegger, A. Mastrano, and P. Marchant, Stability of magnetic fields in non-barotropic stars: an analytic treatment, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.433, 2445 (2013), arXiv:1302.0273 [astro-ph.SR]

  17. [17]

    V. A. Skoutnev and A. M. Beloborodov, Tayler Instability Revisited, Astrophys. J.974, 290 (2024), arXiv:2404.19103 [astro-ph.SR]

  18. [18]

    V. A. Skoutnev and A. M. Beloborodov, Zones of Tayler Instability in Stars, Astrophys. J.988, 195 (2025), arXiv:2411.08492 [astro-ph.SR]

  19. [19]

    Braithwaite, The stability of toroidal fields in stars, Astron

    J. Braithwaite, The stability of toroidal fields in stars, Astron. Astrophys.453, 687 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0512182 [astro- ph]

  20. [20]

    V. Duez, J. Braithwaite, and S. Mathis, On the Stability of Non-force-free Magnetic Equilibria in Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 724, L34 (2010), arXiv:1009.5384 [astro-ph.SR]

  21. [21]

    Kiuchi, S

    K. Kiuchi, S. Yoshida, and M. Shibata, Nonaxisymmetric instabilities of neutron star with toroidal magnetic fields, Astron. Astrophys.532, A30 (2011), arXiv:1104.5561 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    S. K. Lander and D. I. Jones, Instabilities in neutron stars with toroidal magnetic fields, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.412, 1394 (2011), arXiv:1009.2453 [astro-ph.SR]

  23. [23]

    J. C. Ib´ a˜ nez-Mej´ ıa and J. Braithwaite, Stability of toroidal magnetic fields in stellar interiors, Astron. Astrophys.578, A5 (2015), arXiv:1503.04450 [astro-ph.SR]. 38

  24. [24]

    Guerrero, F

    G. Guerrero, F. Del Sordo, A. Bonanno, and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, Global simulations of Tayler instability in stellar interiors: the stabilizing effect of gravity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.490, 4281 (2019), arXiv:1909.02897 [astro-ph.SR]

  25. [25]

    S. Ji, J. Fuller, and D. Lecoanet, Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the Tayler instability in rotating stellar interiors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.521, 5372 (2023), arXiv:2209.08104 [astro-ph.SR]

  26. [26]

    Monteiro, G

    G. Monteiro, G. Guerrero, F. Del Sordo, A. Bonanno, and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, Global simulations of Tayler instability in stellar interiors: a long-time multistage evolution of the magnetic field, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.521, 1415 (2023), arXiv:2211.10536 [astro-ph.SR]

  27. [27]

    D. G. Meduri, R. Arlt, A. Bonanno, and G. Licciardello, Gravity’s role in taming the Tayler instability in red giant cores, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.19849 (2024), arXiv:2411.19849 [astro-ph.SR]

  28. [28]

    H. C. Spruit, Differential rotation and magnetic fields in stellar interiors, Astron. Astrophys.349, 189 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9907138 [astro-ph]

  29. [29]

    H. C. Spruit, Dynamo action by differential rotation in a stably stratified stellar interior, Astron. Astrophys.381, 923 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108207 [astro-ph]

  30. [30]

    Barr` ere, J

    P. Barr` ere, J. Guilet, A. Reboul-Salze, R. Raynaud, and H. T. Janka, A new scenario for magnetar formation: Tayler-Spruit dynamo in a proto-neutron star spun up by fallback, Astron. Astrophys.668, A79 (2022), arXiv:2206.01269 [astro-ph.HE]

  31. [31]

    Barr` ere, J

    P. Barr` ere, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and A. Reboul-Salze, Numerical simulations of the Tayler-Spruit dynamo in proto- magnetars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, L88 (2023), arXiv:2306.12296 [astro-ph.HE]

  32. [32]

    Barr` ere, J

    P. Barr` ere, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and A. Reboul-Salze, Tayler-Spruit dynamo in stably stratified rotating fluids: Appli- cation to proto-magnetars, Astron. Astrophys.695, A183 (2025), arXiv:2407.01775 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [34]

    Maeder and G

    A. Maeder and G. Meynet, Stellar evolution with rotation and magnetic fields. II. General equations for the transport by Tayler-Spruit dynamo, Astron. Astrophys.422, 225 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404417 [astro-ph]

  34. [35]

    Maeder and G

    A. Maeder and G. Meynet, Stellar evolution with rotation and magnetic fields. III. The interplay of circulation and dynamo, Astron. Astrophys.440, 1041 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0506347 [astro-ph]

  35. [36]

    Asatiani, P

    L. Asatiani, P. Eggenberger, M. Marchand, F. D. Moyano, G. Meynet, and A. Choplin, Impact of the Tayler magnetic instability on the surface abundance of boron in massive stars, Astron. Astrophys.699, L8 (2025), arXiv:2507.04267 [astro-ph.SR]

  36. [37]

    Buldgen, A

    G. Buldgen, A. Noels, A. M. Amarsi, D. Nandal, C. Pezzotti, R. Scuflaire, M. Deal, and N. Grevesse, Constraints on the properties of macroscopic transport in the Sun from combined lithium and beryllium depletion, Astron. Astrophys.694, A285 (2025), arXiv:2501.03723 [astro-ph.SR]

  37. [38]

    Fuller, A

    J. Fuller, A. L. Piro, and A. S. Jermyn, Slowing the spins of stellar cores, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.485, 3661 (2019), arXiv:1902.08227 [astro-ph.SR]

  38. [39]

    Aerts, S

    C. Aerts, S. Mathis, and T. M. Rogers, Angular Momentum Transport in Stellar Interiors, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 35 (2019), arXiv:1809.07779 [astro-ph.SR]

  39. [40]

    P. A. Denissenkov and M. Pinsonneault, A Revised Prescription for the Tayler-Spruit Dynamo: Magnetic Angular Mo- mentum Transport in Stars, Astrophys. J.655, 1157 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0604045 [astro-ph]

  40. [41]

    J.-P. Zahn, A. S. Brun, and S. Mathis, On magnetic instabilities and dynamo action in stellar radiation zones, Astron. Astrophys.474, 145 (2007), arXiv:0707.3287 [astro-ph]

  41. [42]

    Petitdemange, F

    L. Petitdemange, F. Marcotte, and C. Gissinger, Spin-down by dynamo action in simulated radiative stellar layers, Science 379, 300 (2023), arXiv:2206.13819 [astro-ph.SR]

  42. [43]

    Petitdemange, F

    L. Petitdemange, F. Marcotte, C. Gissinger, and F. Daniel, Tayler-Spruit dynamo simulations for the modeling of radiative stellar layers, Astron. Astrophys.681, A75 (2024)

  43. [44]

    Igoshev, P

    A. Igoshev, P. Barr` ere, R. Raynaud, J. Guilet, T. Wood, and R. Hollerbach, A connection between proto-neutron-star Tayler-Spruit dynamos and low-field magnetars, Nature Astronomy9, 541 (2025), arXiv:2501.04768 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [45]

    Cantiello, C

    M. Cantiello, C. Mankovich, L. Bildsten, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, and B. Paxton, Angular Momentum Transport within Evolved Low-mass Stars, Astrophys. J.788, 93 (2014), arXiv:1405.1419 [astro-ph.SR]

  45. [46]

    Eggenberger, J

    P. Eggenberger, J. W. den Hartogh, G. Buldgen, G. Meynet, S. J. A. J. Salmon, and S. Deheuvels, Asteroseismology of evolved stars to constrain the internal transport of angular momentum. II. Test of a revised prescription for transport by the Tayler instability, Astron. Astrophys.631, L6 (2019), arXiv:2001.11525 [astro-ph.SR]

  46. [47]

    Eggenberger, G

    P. Eggenberger, G. Buldgen, and S. J. A. J. Salmon, Rotation rate of the solar core as a key constraint to magnetic angular momentum transport in stellar interiors, Astron. Astrophys.626, L1 (2019), arXiv:1911.06343 [astro-ph.SR]

  47. [48]

    J. W. den Hartogh, P. Eggenberger, and S. Deheuvels, Asteroseismology of evolved stars to constrain the internal trans- port of angular momentum. III. Using the rotation rates of intermediate-mass stars to test the Fuller-formalism, Astron. Astrophys.634, L16 (2020), arXiv:2002.06566 [astro-ph.SR]

  48. [49]

    Fuller and W

    J. Fuller and W. Lu, The spins of compact objects born from helium stars in binary systems, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 3951 (2022), arXiv:2201.08407 [astro-ph.HE]

  49. [50]

    F. D. Moyano, P. Eggenberger, and S. J. A. J. Salmon, Angular momentum transport near convective-core boundaries of Gamma Doradus stars, Astron. Astrophys.681, L16 (2024), arXiv:2401.05543 [astro-ph.SR]

  50. [51]

    I. B. Bernstein, E. A. Frieman, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Kulsrud, An Energy Principle for Hydromagnetic Stability Problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A244, 17 (1958)

  51. [52]

    Brandenburg, A

    Pencil Code Collaboration, A. Brandenburg, A. Johansen, P. Bourdin, W. Dobler, W. Lyra, M. Rheinhardt, S. Bingert, N. Haugen, A. Mee, F. Gent, N. Babkovskaia, C.-C. Yang, T. Heinemann, B. Dintrans, D. Mitra, S. Candelaresi, J. War- necke, P. K¨ apyl¨ a, A. Schreiber, P. Chatterjee, M. K¨ apyl¨ a, X.-Y. Li, J. Kr¨ uger, J. Aarnes, G. Sarson, J. Oishi, J. S...

  52. [53]

    J. P. H. Goedbloed and S. Poedts,Principles of Magnetohydrodynamics(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

  53. [54]

    Akg¨ un and I

    T. Akg¨ un and I. Wasserman, Toroidal magnetic fields in type II superconducting neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 383, 1551 (2008), arXiv:0705.2195 [astro-ph]

  54. [55]

    D. L. Moss and R. J. Tayler, The influence of a poloidal magnetic field on convection in spherical shells, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.145, 217 (1969)

  55. [56]

    Reisenegger, Stable magnetic equilibria and their evolution in the upper main sequence, white dwarfs, and neutron stars, Astron

    A. Reisenegger, Stable magnetic equilibria and their evolution in the upper main sequence, white dwarfs, and neutron stars, Astron. Astrophys.499, 557 (2009), arXiv:0809.0361 [astro-ph]

  56. [57]

    Becerra, A

    L. Becerra, A. Reisenegger, J. A. Valdivia, and M. Gusakov, Stability of axially symmetric magnetic fields in stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517, 560 (2022), arXiv:2209.01042 [astro-ph.SR]

  57. [58]

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, Secular instability of rotating Newtonian stars., Astrophys. J.222, 281 (1978)

  58. [59]

    N. K. Sinha, Structure of polytropes with purely toroidal magnetic fields, Australian Journal of Physics21, 283 (1968)

  59. [60]

    N. K. Sood and S. K. Trehan, Oscillations of a Polytrope with a Toroidal Magnetic Field, Astrophys. Space Sci.16, 451 (1972)

  60. [61]

    M. E. Gusakov, E. M. Kantor, and D. D. Ofengeim, Evolution of the magnetic field in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D96, 103012 (2017)

  61. [62]

    Braithwaite, Axisymmetric magnetic fields in stars: relative strengths of poloidal and toroidal components, Mon

    J. Braithwaite, Axisymmetric magnetic fields in stars: relative strengths of poloidal and toroidal components, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.397, 763 (2009), arXiv:0810.1049 [astro-ph]

  62. [63]

    C. J. Hansen, S. D. Kawaler, and V. Trimble,Stellar interiors : physical principles, structure, and evolution(Springer, 2004)

  63. [64]

    Schmitt and P

    A. Schmitt and P. Shternin, Reaction Rates and Transport in Neutron Stars, inAstrophysics and Space Science Library, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 457, edited by L. Rezzolla, P. Pizzochero, D. I. Jones, N. Rea, and I. Vida˜ na (2018) p. 455, arXiv:1711.06520 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [65]

    Thompson and R

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, Neutron Star Dynamos and the Origins of Pulsar Magnetism, Astrophys. J.408, 194 (1993)

  65. [66]

    Iwamoto and C

    N. Iwamoto and C. J. Pethick, Effects of nucleon-nucleon interactions on scattering of neutrinos in neutron matter, Phys. Rev. D25, 313 (1982)

  66. [67]

    Radice and I

    D. Radice and I. Hawke, Turbulence modelling in neutron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics10, 1 (2024), arXiv:2402.03224 [astro-ph.HE]

  67. [68]

    Becerra, A

    L. Becerra, A. Reisenegger, J. A. Valdivia, and M. E. Gusakov, Evolution of random initial magnetic fields in stably stratified and barotropic stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.511, 732 (2022), arXiv:2111.10673 [astro-ph.SR]

  68. [69]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for mp4 movies illustrating the evolution of the seven representative simulations discussed in Sec. IX

  69. [70]

    Rembiasz, M

    T. Rembiasz, M. Obergaulinger, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, M.-´A. Aloy, and E. M¨ uller, On the Measurements of Numerical Viscosity and Resistivity in Eulerian MHD Codes, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.230, 18 (2017), arXiv:1611.05858 [astro-ph.IM]

  70. [71]

    S. R. Lantz,Dynamical Behavior of Magnetic Fields in a Stratified, Convecting Fluid Layer, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, New York (1992)

  71. [72]

    S. I. Braginsky and P. H. Roberts, Equations governing convection in earth’s core and the geodynamo, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics79, 1 (1995)

  72. [73]

    Goldstein, R

    J. Goldstein, R. H. D. Townsend, and E. G. Zweibel, The Tayler Instability in the Anelastic Approximation, Astrophys. J.881, 66 (2019), arXiv:1808.08958 [astro-ph.SR]

  73. [74]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,Fluid mechanics(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987)

  74. [75]

    equilibrium Cowling approximation

    B. P. Brown, G. M. Vasil, and E. G. Zweibel, Energy Conservation and Gravity Waves in Sound-proof Treatments of Stellar Interiors. Part I. Anelastic Approximations, Astrophys. J.756, 109 (2012), arXiv:1207.2804 [astro-ph.SR]. Appendix A: Accurate minimization of the ratioW[ξ ξξ]/I[ξξξ]with respect to∇ ∇∇ ·ξξξ In Sec. III D we presented Eq. (37), which was...