REVIEW 2 cited by
Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper considers the problem of inference in cluster randomized experiments when cluster sizes are non-ignorable. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the cluster level. By non-ignorable cluster sizes, we refer to the possibility that the treatment effects may depend non-trivially on the cluster sizes. We frame our analysis in a super-population framework in which cluster sizes are random. In this way, our analysis departs from earlier analyses of cluster randomized experiments in which cluster sizes are treated as non-random. We distinguish between two different parameters of interest: the equally-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect, and the size-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect. For each parameter, we provide methods for inference in an asymptotic framework where the number of clusters tends to infinity and treatment is assigned using a covariate-adaptive stratified randomization procedure. We additionally permit the experimenter to sample only a subset of the units within each cluster rather than the entire cluster and demonstrate the implications of such sampling for some commonly used estimators. A small simulation study and empirical demonstration show the practical relevance of our theoretical results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
What is estimated in cluster randomized crossover trials with informative sizes? -- A survey of estimands and common estimators
In 2-period cluster randomized crossover trials with informative sizes, independence estimating equations always target the intended average treatment effect estimands, while nested exchangeable mixed model estimators do not.
-
Misspecified regressions with mixed regressors: robust inference and causal interpretation
Misspecified Z-estimation and OLS with mixed (random+fixed) regressors yield conservative robust SEs and identify causal ATEs under randomization, with corrections for fully-interacted specs and clustered data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.