Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.08356 v7 pith:HXGHHQKF submitted 2022-04-18 econ.EM stat.ME

classification econ.EMstat.ME
keywords clustersizestreatmentrandomizedexperimentsinferencenon-ignorableanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper considers the problem of inference in cluster randomized experiments when cluster sizes are non-ignorable. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the cluster level. By non-ignorable cluster sizes, we refer to the possibility that the treatment effects may depend non-trivially on the cluster sizes. We frame our analysis in a super-population framework in which cluster sizes are random. In this way, our analysis departs from earlier analyses of cluster randomized experiments in which cluster sizes are treated as non-random. We distinguish between two different parameters of interest: the equally-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect, and the size-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect. For each parameter, we provide methods for inference in an asymptotic framework where the number of clusters tends to infinity and treatment is assigned using a covariate-adaptive stratified randomization procedure. We additionally permit the experimenter to sample only a subset of the units within each cluster rather than the entire cluster and demonstrate the implications of such sampling for some commonly used estimators. A small simulation study and empirical demonstration show the practical relevance of our theoretical results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. What is estimated in cluster randomized crossover trials with informative sizes? -- A survey of estimands and common estimators

    stat.ME 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2-period cluster randomized crossover trials with informative sizes, independence estimating equations always target the intended average treatment effect estimands, while nested exchangeable mixed model estimators do not.

  2. Misspecified regressions with mixed regressors: robust inference and causal interpretation

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Misspecified Z-estimation and OLS with mixed (random+fixed) regressors yield conservative robust SEs and identify causal ATEs under randomization, with corrections for fully-interacted specs and clustered data.

Pith tools