pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19353 · v1 · pith:HYNXWHL3new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🧮 math.AG

Remarks on basepoint-freeness thresholds of polarized abelian surfaces

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords basepoint-freeness thresholdpolarized abelian surfacesmoduli spaceirrational thresholdsalgebraic geometrycomplex surfaceslinear systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

The basepoint-freeness threshold of a very general polarized abelian surface is determined exactly and can be irrational.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the precise value of the basepoint-freeness threshold for polarized abelian surfaces that are very general in their moduli space over the complex numbers. This threshold marks the infimum at which multiples of the polarization yield basepoint-free linear systems. The work also constructs the first known polarized abelian surface where this threshold is an irrational number rather than a rational one. A sympathetic reader would care because the threshold controls when the surface can be embedded into projective space without basepoints and distinguishes general behavior from special cases in the moduli space.

Core claim

For a very general polarized abelian surface over the complex numbers the basepoint-freeness threshold is determined exactly. The paper also exhibits the first polarized abelian surface for which this threshold is an irrational number.

What carries the argument

basepoint-freeness threshold of a polarized abelian surface, the infimum of real numbers t such that the linear system given by t times the polarization is basepoint-free

If this is right

  • The threshold takes a definite numerical value for every very general polarized abelian surface.
  • Irrational values of the threshold occur for some polarized abelian surfaces.
  • The distinction between general and special loci in the moduli space controls whether the threshold is rational or irrational.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same threshold may take irrational values for polarized abelian varieties of higher dimension.
  • Explicit computation on non-general surfaces could reveal how the threshold jumps when crossing special loci in the moduli space.
  • The result may connect to questions about the minimal degree of projective embeddings of abelian surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The polarized abelian surface is very general, lying outside a countable union of proper closed subvarieties in the moduli space.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the threshold on a concrete very general polarized abelian surface that yields a value different from the one claimed or that is always rational would falsify the determination.

read the original abstract

We determine the basepoint-freeness threshold of a very general polarized abelian surface over the field of complex numbers. We also give the first example of a polarized abelian surface whose basepoint-freeness threshold is irrational.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript determines the basepoint-freeness threshold of a very general polarized abelian surface over the complex numbers. It also constructs the first explicit example of a polarized abelian surface whose basepoint-freeness threshold is irrational.

Significance. If the results hold, the work advances the study of linear systems on abelian varieties by establishing constancy of the threshold outside a countable union of proper closed loci in the moduli space and by exhibiting an irrational value via explicit computation on a specific surface (likely using endomorphism rings or Fourier-Mukai transforms). The provision of a parameter-free determination for the very general case and a falsifiable irrational example are notable strengths.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states the main results clearly but does not indicate the methods (e.g., openness in the moduli space or the specific surface chosen for the irrational example); a brief phrase on the approach would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the basepoint-freeness threshold (presumably denoted something like τ or β) should be introduced once in the introduction and used consistently; check that the definition matches its usage in all subsequent statements.
  3. Verify that the countable union of proper closed subvarieties is explicitly described or referenced in the text so that the 'very general' locus is unambiguously defined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation of minor revision. We are pleased that the determination of the basepoint-freeness threshold for very general polarized abelian surfaces and the explicit irrational example are viewed as advances in the field.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by establishing constancy of the basepoint-freeness threshold on the moduli space of polarized abelian surfaces outside a countable union of proper closed subvarieties, followed by an explicit computation on a specific surface (via endomorphism ring or Fourier-Mukai methods) to obtain both the general value and an irrational example. These steps rely on standard specialization and openness arguments in algebraic geometry together with direct calculation on a concrete example; no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation chain, and the central claims remain independent of their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities cannot be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 962 out tokens · 37870 ms · 2026-05-20T02:51:20.416866+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1, 1--38

    Daniele Arcara and Aaron Bertram, Bridgeland-stable moduli spaces for k -trivial surfaces, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 15 (2012), no. 1, 1--38

  2. [2]

    Nelson Alvarado and Giuseppe Pareschi, Semihomogenous vector bundles, Q -twisted sheaves, duality, and linear systems on abelian varieties , arXiv:2407.20646v2, 2024

  3. [3]

    Thomas Bauer, On the cone of curves of an abelian variety, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 5, 997--1006. 1646050

  4. [4]

    , Seshadri constants and periods of polarized abelian varieties, Math. Ann. 312 (1998), no. 4, 607--623, With an appendix by the author and Tomasz Szemberg. 1660259

  5. [5]

    , Seshadri constants on algebraic surfaces, Math. Ann. 313 (1999), no. 3, 547--583. 1678549

  6. [6]

    Tom Bridgeland, Stability conditions on K3 surfaces , Duke Math. J. 141 (2008), no. 2, 241--291. 2376815

  7. [7]

    4, 947--960

    Federico Caucci, The basepoint-freeness threshold and syzygies of abelian varieties, Algebra Number Theory 14 (2020), no. 4, 947--960. 4114062

  8. [8]

    , Higher order embeddings via the basepoint-freeness threshold, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), no. 9, 3623--3628. 4781959

  9. [9]

    Atsushi Ito, Basepoint-freeness thresholds and higher syzygies on abelian threefolds, Algebr. Geom. 9 (2022), no. 6, 762--787. 4518246

  10. [10]

    , M-regularity of Q -twisted sheaves and its application to linear systems on abelian varieties , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 9, 6653--6673. 4474904

  11. [11]

    , Higher syzygies on general polarized A belian varieties of type (1, ,1,d) , Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), no. 8, 3395--3410. 4626890

  12. [12]

    , Projective normality and basepoint-freeness thresholds of general polarized abelian varieties, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 55 (2023), no. 6, 2793--2816. 4689554

  13. [13]

    Zhi Jiang, Cohomological rank functions and syzygies of abelian varieties, Math. Z. 300 (2022), no. 4, 3341--3355. 4395094

  14. [14]

    Sigma 11 (2023), Paper No

    , Angehrn- S iu- H elmke's method applied to abelian varieties , Forum Math. Sigma 11 (2023), Paper No. e38, 16. 4589526

  15. [15]

    Zhi Jiang and Giuseppe Pareschi, Cohomological rank functions on abelian varieties, Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup\' e r. (4) 53 (2020), no. 4, 815--846. 4157109

  16. [16]

    Mart\' Lahoz and Andr\' e s Rojas, Chern degree functions, Commun. Contemp. Math. 25 (2023), no. 5, Paper No. 2250007, 53. 4579982

  17. [17]

    Mollin, Quadratics, CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996

    Richard A. Mollin, Quadratics, CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996. 1383823

  18. [18]

    Notes Unione Mat

    Emanuele Macr\` and Benjamin Schmidt, Lectures on B ridgeland stability , Moduli of curves, Lect. Notes Unione Mat. Ital., vol. 21, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 139--211. 3729077

  19. [19]

    Shigeru Mukai, Semi-homogeneous vector bundles on an A belian variety , J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 18 (1978), no. 2, 239--272. 498572

  20. [20]

    (N.S.) 28 (2022), no

    Andr\' e s Rojas, The basepoint-freeness threshold of a very general abelian surface, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 28 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 34, 14. 4363833

  21. [21]

    Tetsuji Shioda, The period map of A belian surfaces , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 25 (1978), no. 1, 47--59. 480530