Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 95 references

The Environmental Dependence of Star Cluster Demographics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Star-cluster demographics are environmentally dependent, but no one-parameter model currently explains the variation in the high-mass cutoff.

desk verdict A careful, useful forward-modelling study that makes a good case for galaxy-scale environmental complexity, but the sub-galactic M_break story needs a completeness check before I'd quote it. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09439 v1 pith:I3ASXO5D submitted 2026-08-10 astro-ph.GA

Jianling Tang , Kathryn Grasha , Mark R. Krumholz , Tomasz Różański This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starclusterdemographicsmassfunctionLEGUSsurveycompletenessBayesianforwardmodellingdisruptiongalacticenvironmentSchechter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the demographics of young star clusters depend on galactic environment in a way that is real but not simple. Using about 8300 clusters from 12 LEGUS galaxies and a forward-modelling approach that accounts for catalogue incompleteness, the authors find that the low-mass slope of the cluster mass function is near universal, close to a power law $M^{-2}$, while the high-mass truncation mass varies by orders of magnitude between and within galaxies. The variation does not track star-formation-rate surface density or shear, and the two theoretical models they test do not reproduce it. If right, this means the upper end of the cluster mass function is environmentally regulated by a combination of local conditions, not by any single galaxy-wide parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the c-4 neural-network completeness estimator, a model trained on artificial cluster injection tests to output the probability that a cluster with given photometric properties would be recovered by the survey pipeline. This probability feeds directly into the likelihood of a stochastic forward-modelling framework: synthetic clusters are drawn from a library, weighted by the assumed mass-age-extinction distribution and by their catalogue-inclusion probability, and the predicted photometric catalogue is compared with the observed one. This replaces hard completeness cuts and lets partially detected faint and low-mass clusters contribute to the inference. The comparison is done separately for each filter combination, and posterior sampling of the demographic parameters uses an ensemble MCMC sampler.

What would settle it

Retrain the c-4 completeness model separately on artificial clusters injected only in the inner ($R<2.4$ kpc) and outer regions of NGC 5457 and re-fit the mass function: if the inferred break masses converge, the reported environmental gradient is a catalogue-completeness artifact; if they stay apart, the environmental signal is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a pattern in cluster demographics: the slope of the young cluster mass function is broadly universal, consistent with $M^{-2}$, but the mass at which the function truncates shifts by more than two decades between galaxies whose star-formation surface densities are within a factor of two of one another. Within single galaxies, sub-galactic regions also show differences: the central fields of NGC 5457 and NGC 5194-5195 have higher or effectively untruncated break masses while outer fields are truncated near $10^{4.3}$ to $10^{4.7}$ solar masses, whereas NGC 628 shows no radial break variation but differs between its observational fields. The paper also finds that the cluster age distribution is best described by mass-independent disruption in most of the 12 galaxies, with wide variation in when disruption begins. The authors conclude that environmental regulation of cluster formation is real but multivariate: none of the tested current models, whether shear-based, gas-and-dynamics-based, or a simple star-formation-surface-density relation, explains the observed pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The completeness model trained once per galaxy field is assumed to remain valid for smaller radial subregions of that field, even though crowding, background, and detection conditions vary within the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The low-mass slope of the cluster mass function is approximately universal, so any theory of cluster formation must explain why the slope stays near $-2$ across environments while the high-mass cutoff moves.
  • A galaxy-wide star-formation-rate surface density does not determine the break mass; NGC 628, for example, rules out truncation below about $10^6$ solar masses despite a star-formation surface density that would predict a much lower break.
  • Rotation-curve shear alone fails as a predictor: NGC 5457 and NGC 5194-5195 show inner-outer differences, but NGC 628 shows none across the same shear boundary.
  • Cluster disruption appears mass-independent over the observable range, with the onset time of disruption varying from about a million years to more than a gigayear among galaxies.
  • Reported break masses should be interpreted through full posterior distributions, because the cluster mass function slope and break mass are strongly covariant and single best-fit values can mislead.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper's own completeness caveat suggests a decisive control experiment - retrain the completeness model on radial subregions of NGC 5457; if the inner-outer break-mass difference persists, it is environmental, and if it shrinks, it is a detection artifact.
  • Editorial inference: the red-band residual reported in the paper will shift inferred masses and ages through the age-extinction degeneracy, so deeper and redder follow-up data are the most direct way to tighten constraints on the upper cluster-mass scale.
  • Editorial inference: the failure of one-parameter relations points toward stacking sub-galactic bins across many galaxies and jointly fitting local gas surface density, epicyclic frequency, pressure, and recent star-formation history as predictors of the break mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a Bayesian forward-modelling analysis of ~8300 star clusters in 12 LEGUS galaxies, using the slug stellar population synthesis framework and a neural-network completeness estimator (c-4) to infer cluster mass functions, age distributions, and extinction distributions at both galaxy-wide and sub-galactic scales. The main claims are that cluster mass function slopes are broadly consistent with a power law of slope near -2, that the Schechter truncation mass M_break varies by orders of magnitude between and within galaxies, that mass-independent disruption is favoured over mass-dependent disruption, and that these variations are not well described by simple one-parameter environmental scalings such as star formation rate surface density or shear. The paper also reports posterior predictive checks that reproduce observed luminosity functions in four of five broad bands, with a residual in F814W that the authors attribute to stellar population synthesis modelling.

Significance. If the main conclusions hold, this is an important step in star cluster demographics: it demonstrates that a full forward-modelling treatment with a continuous selection function can extract demographic parameters from partially incomplete catalogues, and it challenges the existence of a universal relation between galaxy-averaged star formation rate surface density and the cluster mass function truncation mass. The paper is explicit about its methodological debt to Tang et al. (2026) for the c-4 completeness model, and it provides posterior predictive checks and openly acknowledges the F814W systematic. The sub-galactic comparison with the Reina-Campos & Kruijssen (2017) framework is a useful, falsifiable confrontation. The main weakness is that the radial subregion analysis rests on an unvalidated transfer of field-level completeness to radial bins, which is directly relevant to the paper's strongest claim of sub-galactic environmental dependence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (4)] The sub-galactic analysis assumes that field-level c-4 completeness models can be applied to radial subregions without retraining, but this assumption is load-bearing and untested. The quantity bP_obs,F(m_j) is learned from artificial cluster tests whose injection positions are drawn from the observed galaxy light distribution, so it marginalizes over the spatial distribution of crowding and background within the whole field. A radial bin samples only a subset of those conditions, and the average recovery probability at fixed magnitude in the bin need not equal the field average. Because Eq. (4) multiplies the intrinsic population weight by bP_obs,F(m_j), a radial-dependent offset in completeness directly biases the relative weights of faint compared to bright clusters and hence the inferred alpha_M and M_break. The paper states in Section 3.2 that 'we expect the galactic-level completeness model to provide an adequate approximation for the radial subsamples', but it supplies no empirical check of this expectation. This matters because the inner/outer differences in Table 3, for example log10(M_break/M_sun)=7.08 versus 4.37 for NGC 5457, are the central evidence for sub-galactic environmental dependence. Please validate the assumption by computing recovery fractions as a function of magnitude in the radial bins from the existing artificial-cluster tests, or retrain c-4 for the subregions and compare the inferred parameters.
  2. [Section 5.3, Fig. 10] The paper acknowledges a systematic residual in the F814W band for all three representative galaxies, but it does not propagate this systematic into the reported demographic parameter constraints. The text states that the residual 'can shift the inferred masses, ages, and extinctions of individual clusters' and that the implication is 'non-negligible', yet the posterior intervals in Tables 2 and 3 are computed from a likelihood that does not include a model for this residual. Since the central claims about M_break variation and the comparison with the Johnson et al. (2017) and Reina-Campos & Kruijssen (2017) relations depend on the fitted M_break values, the quoted intervals are formally too narrow. Please quantify the impact of the F814W residual, for example by refitting the sample without F814W or by adding a band-dependent nuisance term, and state explicitly whether the main conclusions (the orders-of-magnitude variation in M_break and the disagreement with the Sigma_SFR-M_break relation) survive.
  3. [Section 5.2.4 and Appendix A, Eqs. (A12)-(A13)] The conclusion that the Reina-Campos & Kruijssen (2017) model 'fails to reproduce' the observations is weakened by the way the model uncertainty envelope is constructed. In Appendix A, the upper bound of the model envelope is defined as the maximum of the present-day and historical predictions, where the historical prediction uses an ad hoc factor f_hist that is chosen per region (e.g., f_hist=10 for NW2 and NW3). This makes the model comparison effectively partially fitted to the data, since the choice of f_hist is motivated by the same observational evidence that the comparison is intended to test. The paper should either present the comparison with a prespecified f_hist, show the sensitivity of the conclusion to f_hist, or soften the claim that the model cannot explain the observed radial trends.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] The text says 'span nearly one orders of magnitude'; this should be 'span nearly an order of magnitude'.
  2. [Section 3.4] The convergence criterion 'N_post >= 50 tau_int' is described with 'our 1500 post-burn-in iterations', but with 100 walkers the effective number of post-burn-in samples is 150,000; please clarify whether the criterion is applied per walker or to the pooled sample.
  3. [Section 4.2] The sub-galactic analysis reports only MID results and states that tests against MDD are omitted because MID is preferred, but no Akaike weights are given for the radial subregions; please quantify the MID preference for the subregions or state that model choice does not affect the CMF conclusions.
  4. [Figure 10] The top-left panel of Figure 10 combines F435W and F438W in one column; the caption should state which galaxies are observed in each filter and whether the combined panel is a weighted average or a plot of one filter.
  5. [Table 3] The table lists only marginal medians for alpha_M and M_break, but the text emphasizes that these parameters are strongly covariant; a joint posterior plot for the radial subdivisions would help the reader assess the significance of the reported differences.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the demographic parameters are fitted from photometry via a forward model and then compared with external theoretical models; the central claims do not reduce to the model inputs by construction.

full rationale

The inference chain is self-contained forward modelling. c-4 supplies the catalogue-inclusion probability bPobs from artificial star-cluster tests trained on injected slug clusters; these training data are generated independently of the demographic parameters theta, and the likelihood in Eqs. (2)-(4) simply reweights the slug library by bPobs f(...|theta)/p_lib. The posteriors on Mbreak, alpha_M, T_MID etc. are then interpreted against external relations (Johnson et al. 2017) and external models (Suwannajak et al. 2014; Reina-Campos & Kruijssen 2017), so the environmental claim is not obtained by definition. The self-citations to slug (Krumholz et al. 2019b) and c-4 (Tang et al. 2026) are to code-reproduced tools whose training assumptions do not include the target result, so they constitute independent support rather than load-bearing circularity. The acknowledged limitations—use of a galactic-level completeness model for radial subdivisions (Sec. 3.2) and the F814W stellar-population residual (Sec. 5.3)—are real systematic uncertainties that could shift Mbreak, but they are assumptions about transfer validity and model accuracy, not demonstrations that a predicted quantity equals a fitted input by construction. The posterior predictive checks of Sec. 5.3 are in-sample and therefore do not validate the model, but the paper presents them as goodness-of-fit summaries, not as out-of-sample predictions. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's results rest on a long chain of modelling assumptions: the IMF, stellar population synthesis, extinction treatment, parametric forms for mass and age distributions, and the neural-network completeness model. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumptions are the transferability of field-level completeness to subregions and the accuracy of the stellar models at F814W, the latter openly acknowledged as a systematic residual.

free parameters (7)
  • alpha_M (cluster mass function slope) = posterior medians from -2.24 to -1.46 across galaxies (Table 2)
    Central parameter of the Schechter mass function; fitted per galaxy and per subregion.
  • M_break (Schechter truncation mass) = posterior medians log10(Mbreak/Msun) from 3.94 to 7.25 across galaxies (Table 2)
    High-mass cutoff of the cluster mass function; the key quantity for the environmental dependence claim.
  • alpha_T (age distribution slope) = posterior medians from -2.52 to -0.48 (Table 2)
    Slope of the cluster age distribution after disruption begins.
  • T_MID (disruption onset age) = posterior medians log10(TMID/yr) from 5.90 to 9.42 (Table 2)
    Age below which clusters do not disrupt in the mass-independent disruption model.
  • gamma_MDD (mass dependence of disruption) = 0.69 for NGC 3344, the only galaxy where MDD is marginally favoured (Table 2)
    Exponent in the mass-loss prescription for the mass-dependent disruption model.
  • T_MDD0 (disruption time at reference mass) = log10(TMDD0/yr)=9.19 for NGC 3344 (Table 2)
    Disruption timescale at 100 Msun in the mass-dependent disruption model.
  • Extinction PDF anchor amplitudes = six piecewise-linear amplitudes over AV from 0 to 3 mag, not tabulated
    Nuisance parameters describing the intrinsic extinction distribution; they add flexibility to the fit but are not the focus of the paper.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Chabrier (2005) IMF is used for all synthetic clusters
    Adopted in Section 3.1; if the IMF differs, synthetic magnitudes and inferred masses shift.
  • domain assumption slug starburst99 spectral synthesis with a Milky Way extinction curve adequately describes young cluster SEDs
    Section 3.1; the paper reports an F814W residual in Section 5.3 suggesting this assumption is imperfect at red wavelengths.
  • domain assumption The cluster population follows a Schechter mass function with either mass-independent (MID) or mass-dependent (MDD) disruption
    Section 3.3; all demographic conclusions are conditional on these parametric families.
  • domain assumption c-4 neural network trained on artificial cluster tests gives unbiased catalogue-inclusion probabilities
    Section 3.2; load-bearing for the completeness correction, but validated in the companion paper Tang et al. (2026).
  • ad hoc to paper Field-level completeness model carries over to radial subregions without retraining
    Section 3.2 explicitly assumes this; a failure would change the sub-galactic M_break comparisons.
  • ad hoc to paper Extinction distribution is piecewise linear with anchor points every 0.5 mag in AV
    Section 3.3.3; flexible nuisance parameterization with six free amplitudes.
  • domain assumption RC&K model parameters (phi_P=3, t_sn=3 Myr, eps_ff=0.012, phi_fb=0.16, eps_cl=0.1) are taken from the literature
    Appendix A; used to generate the theoretical Mcl,max predictions compared with fitted M_break values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Environmental Dependence of Star Cluster Demographics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I3ASXO5D

@misc{pith2026260809439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Environmental Dependence of Star Cluster Demographics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I3ASXO5D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09439}
}
abstract

Both the star cluster mass function and the lifetimes of clusters may vary with galactic environment, but measuring this variation is challenging because in observational surveys real features of cluster demographics are invariably entangled with catalogue incompleteness. Here we analyse $\approx$ 8300 star clusters in 12 galaxies drawn from the LEGUS survey using the slug Bayesian forward modelling framework coupled to our new c-4 neural network-based completeness estimator, which allows us to incorporate realistic catalogue-inclusion probabilities directly into the likelihood and compensate for these biases. We show that this approach allows us to fit observed cluster luminosity functions with excellent fidelity at both galactic and sub-galactic scales. We find that mass function slopes are relatively universal and broadly consistent with a power law $M^{-2}$ form, but high mass truncations vary by orders of magnitude both between and within galaxies. Our fits also strongly favour models where cluster disruption is mass-independent, but the time at which disruption begins again shows wide environmental variations. Our results demonstrate that young cluster demographics are environmentally dependent, with the clearest signal appearing at the upper end of the cluster mass function, but that these variations are not well-explained by any of the models currently in the literature, and do not correlate straightforwardly with properties such as star formation rate per unit area or strength of shear.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09439 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Corner plot showing the posterior probability distributions for the inferred demographic parameters of the NGC 3344 cluster population. The diagonal panels show the 1D marginal posterior distributions, while the off￾diagonal panels show the corresponding 2D posterior probability densities. The colour scale of 2D PDFs represents the logarithmic values of the posterior probability density. The parameters shown are the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sub-galactic CMF comparison for NGC 5457. Left: a false colour HST image of NGC 5457 (source: ESA) with a dashed yellow circle indicating the boundary between our inner and outer galaxy test regions; the circle lies at 𝑅gal = 2.4 kpc, and corresponds to the galactocentric radius at which the rotation curve index 𝛽 = 0.3. Right: posterior CMFs for the inner and outer regions, normalized to unity at 103 𝑀⊙. Solid curv… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posterior PDFs of 𝑀break as a function of galaxy-wide ΣSFR. The black line shows the empirical relation from Johnson et al. (2017), and the grey points show the literature measurements compiled by Wainer et al. (2022). The coloured curves with shaded regions show the m…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between the cluster mass-function break masses fitted in this study and the maximum mass scales predicted by the model of RC&K for NGC 628 (left), NGC 5194–NGC 5195 (middle), and NGC 5457 (right), split into two radial bins at 𝑅gc = 1.6 kpc for NGC 628 and N…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the observed and forward-modelled absolute-magnitude PDFs for young clusters in NGC 5194–NGC 5195 (top), NGC 5457 (middle) and NGC 628 (bottom). The blue curves and error bars show the observed LEGUS catalogue distributions and their Poisson uncerta…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv , author =:1003.2334 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014084 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1003.2334 , journal =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Stochastic stellar cluster IMFs: Models and impact on integrated cluster parameter determination

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/138 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1310.4936 , journal =

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031454 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031454 , eprint =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031454

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1086/316293 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316293 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/316293

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1086/427866 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/427866

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1086/313233 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/313233

  7. [7]

    The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later , date-modified =

  8. [8]

    Star Cluster Properties in Two LEGUS Galaxies Computed with Stochastic Stellar Population Synthesis Models

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/147 , eid =. arXiv , arxivurl =:1509.05078 , journal =

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    , title =

    Tang, Jianling and Grasha, Kathryn and Krumholz, Mark R. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2024 , month =

    2024

  2. [10]

    arXiv , arxivurl =:1203.5825 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219079 , eid =. arXiv , arxivurl =:1203.5825 , journal =

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    , keywords =

    Star Cluster Formation and Evolution in M101: An Investigation with the Legacy Extragalactic UV Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c07 , archivePrefix =. 2206.13972 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1086/520795 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/520795 , eprint =

    doi

  5. [13]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/453 , journal =

    doi

  6. [14]

    and Sabbi, Elena and Adamo, Angela and Smith, Linda J

    Calzetti, Daniela and Lee, Janice C. and Sabbi, Elena and Adamo, Angela and Smith, Linda J. and Andrews, Jennifer E. and Ubeda, Leonardo and Bright, Stephen N. and Thilker, David and Aloisi, Alessandra and Brown, Tom M. and Chandar, Rupali and Christian, Carol and Cignoni, Mon...

    2015

  7. [15]

    and Gouliermis, Dimitrios A

    Grasha, Kathryn and Calzetti, Daniela and Adamo, Angela and Kim, Hwihyun and Elmegreen, Bruce G. and Gouliermis, Dimitrios A. and Aloisi, Alessandra and Bright, Stephen N. and Christian, Carol and Cignoni, Michele and Dale, Daniel A. and Dobbs, Clare and Elmegreen, Debra M. an...

    2015

  8. [16]

    Adamo, Angela and Zeidler, Peter and Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik and Chevance, M. Star Clusters Near and Far: Tracing Star Formation Across Cosmic Time , journal =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  9. [17]

    and Grasha, Kathryn and Elmegreen, Bruce G

    Menon, Shyam H. and Grasha, Kathryn and Elmegreen, Bruce G. and Federrath, Christoph and Krumholz, Mark R. and Calzetti, Daniela and S. The dependence of the hierarchical distribution of star clusters on galactic environment , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  10. [18]

    The young star cluster population of

    Messa, Matteo and Adamo, Angela and. The young star cluster population of. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  11. [19]

    and Lee, Janice C

    Cook, David O. and Lee, Janice C. and Adamo, Angela and Kim, Hyunjin and Chandar, Rupali and Whitmore, Bradley C. and Mok, Angus and Ryon, Jenna E. and Dale, Daniel A. and Calzetti, Daniela , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Search for star cluster age gradients across spiral arms of three LEGUS disc galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1277 , archivePrefix =. 1805.05643 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    and Whitmore, Bradley C

    Hannon, Stephen and Lee, Janice C. and Whitmore, Bradley C. and Chandar, Rupali and Adamo, Angela and Mobasher, Bahram and Aloisi, Alessandra and Calzetti, Daniela and Cignoni, Monica and Cook, David O. and Dale, Daniel A. and Deger, Sinan and Della Bruna, Luisa and Elmegreen,...

    2019

  14. [22]

    , title =

    Brown, Gillen and Gnedin, Oleg Y. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  15. [23]

    and Lee, Janice C

    Whitmore, Bradley C. and Lee, Janice C. and Chandar, Rupali and Thilker, David A. and Hannon, Stephen and Wei, Wei and Huerta, E. A. and Bigiel, Frank and Boquien, M. Star cluster classification in the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  16. [24]

    and Durbin, Meredith J

    Williams, Benjamin F. and Durbin, Meredith J. and Dalcanton, Julianne J. and Lang, Dustin and Girardi, Leo and Smercina, Adam and Dolphin, Andrew and Weisz, Daniel R. and Choi, Yumi and Bell, Eric F. and Rosolowsky, Erik and Skillman, Evan and Koch, Eric W. and Lindberg, Chris...

    2021

  17. [25]

    and Whitmore, Bradley C

    Thilker, David A. and Whitmore, Bradley C. and Lee, Janice C. and White, Richard L. and Williams, Thomas G. and Larson, Kirsten L. and Deger, Sinan and Grasha, Kathryn and Hannon, Stephen and Wei, Wei and Chandar, Rupali , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soc...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Michael , title =

    Zhang, Qing and Fall, S. Michael , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume =. 1999 , doi =

    1999

  19. [27]

    Gieles, Mark and Larsen, S. S. and Scheepmaker, R. A. and Bastian, Nate and Haas, M. R. and Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  20. [28]

    , title =

    Larsen, Søren S. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  21. [29]

    Boutloukos, S. G. and Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2003 , doi =

    2003

  22. [30]

    Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. and Gieles, Mark and Portegies Zwart, Simon F. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  23. [31]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Gieles, Mark , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  24. [32]

    Bastian, Nate and Adamo, Angela and Gieles, Mark and Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. and Larsen, Søren S. and Silva-Villa, Eugenio and Smith, Linda J. and Konstantopoulos, Iraklis S. and Zackrisson, Erik , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  25. [33]

    2012 , volume =

    On the fraction of star formation occurring in bound stellar clusters , journal =. 2012 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21923.x , archivePrefix =. 1208.2963 , primaryClass =

    2012

  26. [34]

    2003 , volume =

    Dynamical evolution of star clusters in tidal fields , journal =. 2003 , volume =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06286.x , archivePrefix =

    2003

  27. [35]

    2008 , volume =

    Stability of Galactic Gas Disks and the Formation of Massive Clusters , journal =. 2008 , volume =. doi:10.1086/592271 , archivePrefix =. 0806.0853 , primaryClass =

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    2006 , volume =

    Star cluster disruption by giant molecular clouds , journal =. 2006 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10711.x , archivePrefix =

    2006

  29. [37]

    2011 , volume =

    Modelling the formation and evolution of star cluster populations in galaxy simulations , journal =. 2011 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18467.x , archivePrefix =. 1102.1013 , primaryClass =

    2011

  30. [38]

    2019 , volume =

    Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time , journal =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 , archivePrefix =. 1812.01615 , primaryClass =

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    2005 , volume =

    The Age Distribution of Massive Star Clusters in the Antennae Galaxies , journal =. 2005 , volume =. doi:10.1086/496878 , archivePrefix =

    2005 doi

  32. [40]

    2010 , volume =

    New Tests for Disruption Mechanisms of Star Clusters: The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds , journal =. 2010 , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/1263 , archivePrefix =. 1002.0779 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    2017 , volume =

    A unified model for the maximum mass scales of molecular clouds, stellar clusters and high-redshift clumps , journal =. 2017 , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx790 , archivePrefix =. 1704.00732 , primaryClass =

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    2015 , volume =

    Probing the role of the galactic environment in the formation of stellar clusters: using M83 as a test bench , journal =. 2015 , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1203 , archivePrefix =. 1505.02997 , primaryClass =

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury. XVIII. The High-mass Truncation of the Star Cluster Mass Function , journal =. 2017 , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6a1f , archivePrefix =. 1703.10312 , primaryClass =

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/145 , archivePrefix =

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/145 , archivePrefix =. 1106.3072 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    , keywords =

    The E-MOSAICS project: simulating the formation and co-evolution of galaxies and their star cluster populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3124 , archivePrefix =. 1712.00019 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical Evolution of the Mass Function of Globular Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323358 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0107298 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    , keywords =

    The Luminosity Function of Star Clusters in Spiral Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/342381 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0206295 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    2017 , volume =

    The Hierarchical Distribution of the Young Stellar Clusters in Six Local Star-forming Galaxies , journal =. 2017 , volume =

    2017

  41. [49]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  42. [50]

    2017 , volume =

    Hierarchical Star Formation in Turbulent Media: Evidence from Young Star Clusters , journal =. 2017 , volume =

    2017

  43. [51]

    Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury. XVI. Star Cluster Formation Efficiency and the Clustered Fraction of Young Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/33 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05349 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    , keywords =

    On the fraction of star clusters surviving the embedded phase. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16511.x , archivePrefix =. 1002.2894 , primaryClass =

    2010

  45. [53]

    , keywords =

    Young Massive Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834 , archivePrefix =. 1002.1961 , primaryClass =

    1961 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Stochastically Lighting Up Galaxies. I. Methods and Validating the SLUG Stochastic Stellar Population Synthesis Code , journal =. 2015 , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374 , archivePrefix =. 1502.06731 , primaryClass =

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2896 , archivePrefix =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2896 , archivePrefix =. 1810.10173 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    2023 , volume =

    Improving Star Cluster Age Estimates in PHANGS--HST Galaxies and the Impact on Cluster Demographics in NGC 628 , journal =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad098 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03689 , primaryClass =

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    PHANGS--HST Catalogs for 100,000 Star Clusters and Compact Associations in 38 Galaxies. I. Observed Properties , journal =. 2024 , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3cd8 , archivePrefix =. 2403.04901 , primaryClass =

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    2024 , volume =

    Bound star clusters observed in a lensed galaxy 460 Myr after the Big Bang , journal =. 2024 , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07703-7 , archivePrefix =. 2401.03224 , primaryClass =

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    , keywords =

    Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301540 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

    Giant clumps in the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2754 , archivePrefix =. 1603.03778 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    2024 , volume =

    Formation of a low-mass galaxy from star clusters in a 600-million-year-old Universe , journal =. 2024 , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08293-0 , archivePrefix =. 2402.08696 , primaryClass =

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , year =

    A first. Astronomy & Astrophysics , year =

  55. [63]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/127 , archivePrefix =

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/127 , archivePrefix =. 1501.04966 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury: Triangulum Extended Region (. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  57. [65]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury: Triangulum Extended Region (. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d91 , archivePrefix =. 2201.04161 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    2025 , volume =

    The Near Infrared Spectral Energy Distribution of Young Star Clusters in the FEAST Galaxies: Missing Ingredients at 1--5 m , journal =. 2025 , volume =

    2025

  59. [67]

    2026 , doi =

    The emerging timescale of young star clusters regulated by cluster stellar mass , journal =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  60. [68]

    2017 , volume =

    Legacy ExtraGalactic UV Survey with the Hubble Space Telescope: Stellar Cluster Catalogs and First Insights into Cluster Formation and Evolution in NGC 628 , journal =. 2017 , volume =

    2017

  61. [69]

    1996 , volume =

    A Fractal Origin for the Mass Spectrum of Interstellar Clouds , journal =. 1996 , volume =

    1996

  62. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    Hierarchical Star Formation in the Spiral Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  63. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    A Test of Star Formation Laws in Disk Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  64. [72]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Tang, Jianling and Grasha, Kathryn and Różański, Tomasz and Krumholz, Mark R and Zhang, Alan , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1219 , url =

    2026 doi

  65. [73]

    2019 , volume =

    Constraints on Upper Cutoffs in the Mass Functions of Young Star Clusters , journal =. 2019 , volume =

    2019

  66. [74]

    2020 , volume =

    Mass Functions of Giant Molecular Clouds and Young Star Clusters in Six Nearby Galaxies , journal =. 2020 , volume =

    2020

  67. [75]

    2022 , volume =

    Molecular Cloud Populations in the Context of Their Host Galaxy Environments: A Multiwavelength Perspective , journal =. 2022 , volume =

    2022

  68. [76]

    , keywords =

    Fraction of stars in clusters for the LEGUS dwarf galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3748 , archivePrefix =. 2212.07519 , primaryClass =

  69. [77]

    , keywords =

    Exploring the IMF of star clusters: a joint SLUG and LEGUS effort. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx935 , archivePrefix =. 1705.02980 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    , keywords =

    The spatial relation between young star clusters and molecular clouds in M51 with LEGUS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3424 , archivePrefix =. 1812.06109 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    , keywords =

    Connecting young star clusters to CO molecular gas in NGC 7793 with ALMA-LEGUS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2154 , archivePrefix =. 1808.02496 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    , keywords =

    Effective Radii of Young, Massive Star Clusters in Two LEGUS Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa719e , archivePrefix =. 1705.02692 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    2023 , volume =

    Star Formation Laws and Efficiencies across 80 Nearby Galaxies , journal =. 2023 , volume =

    2023

  74. [82]

    , year = 2026, month = jun, doi =

    Getting to know the Stellar Clusters in NGC 1569: Bayesian inference of stellar cluster properties in a dwarf starburst galaxy. , year = 2026, month = jun, doi =

    2026

  75. [83]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , year =

  76. [84]

    The Astronomical Journal , year =

  77. [85]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  78. [86]

    2013 , volume =

    Molecular Gas and Star Formation in Nearby Disk Galaxies , journal =. 2013 , volume =

    2013

  79. [87]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/5 , archivePrefix =. 1212.1208 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    2022 , volume =

    The recent star formation history of NGC 628 on resolved scales , journal =. 2022 , volume =

    2022

  81. [89]

    2013 , volume =

    The Extended Optical Disk of M101 , journal =. 2013 , volume =

    2013

  82. [90]

    2018 , volume =

    Stellar Populations in the Outer Disk and Halo of the Spiral Galaxy M101 , journal =. 2018 , volume =

    2018

  83. [91]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    Deep Narrowband Photometry of the M101 Group: Strong-line Abundances of 720 H\,. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  84. [92]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

    Implications on star formation rate indicators from H\,. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

  85. [93]

    , year = 2007, month = oct, volume =

    On the Interpretation of the Age Distribution of Star Clusters in the Small Magellanic Cloud. , year = 2007, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1086/520795 , archivePrefix =. 0706.1202 , primaryClass =

    2007 arXiv

  86. [94]

    , year = 2021, month = sep, volume =

    A model for the formation of stellar associations and clusters from giant molecular clouds. , year = 2021, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1894 , archivePrefix =. 2008.04453 , primaryClass =

    2021 arXiv

  87. [95]

    , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.