Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analysis of XLS-R for Speech Quality Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12077 v1 pith:I426QF34 submitted 2023-08-23 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords qualityspeechfeaturesperformancexls-ranalysisanalyzeapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In online conferencing applications, estimating the perceived quality of an audio signal is crucial to ensure high quality of experience for the end user. The most reliable way to assess the quality of a speech signal is through human judgments in the form of the mean opinion score (MOS) metric. However, such an approach is labor intensive and not feasible for large-scale applications. The focus has therefore shifted towards automated speech quality assessment through end-to-end training of deep neural networks. Recently, it was shown that leveraging pre-trained wav2vec-based XLS-R embeddings leads to state-of-the-art performance for the task of speech quality prediction. In this paper, we perform an in-depth analysis of the pre-trained model. First, we analyze the performance of embeddings extracted from each layer of XLS-R and also for each size of the model (300M, 1B, 2B parameters). Surprisingly, we find two optimal regions for feature extraction: one in the lower-level features and one in the high-level features. Next, we investigate the reason for the two distinct optima. We hypothesize that the lower-level features capture characteristics of noise and room acoustics, whereas the high-level features focus on speech content and intelligibility. To investigate this, we analyze the sensitivity of the MOS predictions with respect to different levels of corruption in each category. Afterwards, we try fusing the two optimal feature depths to determine if they contain complementary information for MOS prediction. Finally, we compare the performance of the proposed models and assess the generalizability of the models on unseen datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools