Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 79 references

Categorical absorptions of cone singularities

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the derived category of a projective cone over a strong Fano variety has a semiorthogonal decomposition into the derived category of one finite-dimensional algebra and two line bundles, yielding explicit singularity-c

desk verdict Strong conditional contribution: KSODs for cone singularities with explicit absorption algebras, but the central localization lemma is deferred to unpublished Jin-Yang-Zhou, so the main theorems are not fully self-contained. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25406 v1 pith:I4TKMWIN submitted 2026-07-28 math.AG math.RT

Martin Kalck , Nebojsa Pavic , with a joint appendix by Yujiro Kawamata , the authors This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.RT MSC 14F0818G8014J4516E4514B05
keywords categoricalabsorptionsemiorthogonaldecompositionconesingularityFanovarietygeometricexceptionalsequenceCalabi-Yaucompletioncategoryweightedprojectivespace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that for projective cones over a large class of Fano varieties, the bounded derived category admits a semiorthogonal decomposition into a finite-dimensional algebra part and two line bundles, i.e., a Kawamata-type decomposition. In the simplest 'split' case, the algebra is a truncation of a Calabi–Yau completion of the endomorphism algebra of a geometric exceptional sequence; in general, it is a flat deformation of this split algebra. If true, this gives explicit finite-dimensional models for the singularity categories of these cones, hence triangle equivalences between the singularity category of the cone and that of a finite-dimensional algebra, plus vanishing of the first negative K-group. The paper also supplies explicit tilting objects for weighted projective spaces $P(1^d,m)$ in an appendix.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the notion of adherence between an exceptional collection $E$ and an autoequivalence $T$ on the crepant resolution, generalizing the one-object case previously studied for nodal singularities. Under adherence, the cones $K_i$ of $E_i \to T(E_i)$ are $d$-spherical objects generating the kernel of the pushforward, and the absorption algebra is identified as a square-zero extension of $\operatorname{End}(E)$ by the bimodule $\operatorname{Hom}(E, S_E^{-1}E[d-2])$ (Proposition 3.8). The identification of the quotient category relies on a localization result for non-positive dg algebras with finite-dimensional cohomology: the kernel of the idempotent functor $P_e$ is $\operatorname{thick}((H^0(B)/\bar{e})\text{-mod})$, and the quotient is $D_{fg}$

What would settle it

Exhibit a non-positive dg algebra $B$ with finite-dimensional total cohomology and an idempotent $e$ for which the canonical functor $D_{fg}(B)/\ker P_e \to D_{fg}(eBe)$ is not an equivalence, while the equality $\ker P_e = \operatorname{thick}((H^0(B)/\bar{e})\text{-mod})$ holds. Since the paper's Corollary 3.11 and all subsequent algebra descriptions depend on this equivalence, such a counterexample would invalidate the main classification. Alternatively, find a very strong Fano variety $Z$ satisfying Definition 1.1 whose cone yields an algebra $A$ not isomorphic to the split truncation described in Theorem 5.12.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $Z$ be a strong Fano variety and $X$ the projective cone over $Z$ via the anticanonical embedding. The main theorem (Corollary 5.10) asserts a semiorthogonal decomposition $D^b(X) = \langle D^b(A), O_X, O_X(1)\rangle$ for a finite-dimensional $k$-algebra $A$. When $Z$ is very strong and the exceptional collection consists of sheaves, the algebra $A$ is the split square-zero extension $A \cong \operatorname{End}(L) \oplus \operatorname{Hom}(L, S_L^{-1}L[d-2])$, which is a truncation of the $(d-1)$-Calabi–Yau completion of $\operatorname{End}(L)$. In general $A$ is a flat deformation of this split algebra, and the decomposition is admissible with the right orthogonal contained in perfect complexes. The appendix constructs explicit tilting objects $T_d^m$ for weighted projective sp

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is a localization equivalence, attributed in the paper to a forthcoming work, that identifies the quotient $D_{fg}(B)/\ker P_e$ with $D_{fg}(eBe)$ for a non-positive dg algebra $B$ with finite-dimensional cohomology and idempotent $e$; the paper proves only the equality of kernels, and all algebra descriptions rely on this equivalence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every projective cone over a strong Fano variety, the singularity category D_sg(X) is triangle equivalent to D_sg(A) for an explicit finite-dimensional algebra A; consequently K_{-1}(X) = 0.
  • The split-case description covers cones over projective spaces, smooth quadrics, del Pezzo surfaces of degree > 4, smooth del Pezzo threefolds of degree five, and finite products; for these, A is a quiver algebra with relations derived from a potential, so the absorption is computable.
  • When the exceptional collection is not of the required strong type, the paper still obtains a dg-algebra model with cohomology in degrees 0 and k+1−d, yielding a silting object in the perfect subcategory.
  • The appendix gives explicit tilting objects for weighted projective spaces P(1^d,m) for all m,d>1, including non-Gorenstein cases, and derives singular equivalences, e.g., D_sg(P(1^3,2)) ≅ D_sg(k[z1,z2,z3]/(z1,z2,z3)^2).
  • Algebras arising from different cones with the same complete local singularity are flat deformations of each other; for endomorphism algebras of global dimension ≤1 only the split algebra occurs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dependence on the unpublished localization lemma means the algebra identifications are conditional; if the lemma fails, the decompositions may still exist but the explicit A-descriptions would need another proof. An independent verification of the dg-quotient equivalence would settle the main theorem.
  • Because the split algebras are truncations of Calabi–Yau completions, they are related to higher preprojective algebras; this suggests that the singularity category of these cones might be equivalent to the stable category of a finite-dimensional Frobenius algebra, offering a route to knot-theoretic or mirror-symmetric invariants.
  • The deformation perspective (flat family connecting absorption algebras) may provide a way to track how categorical absorption varies in families of cones, potentially linking to noncommutative deformations of the underlying Fano variety.
  • One could test the non-split case by computing Hochschild cohomology H^2(End(L), Hom(L, S^{-1}L[d-2])) for concrete examples; vanishing would imply all cones with the same local singularity are split.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops a framework for Kuznetsov–Shinder categorical absorption of isolated cone singularities. For a projective cone X over a strong Fano variety Z (with respect to the anticanonical embedding), the authors prove a semiorthogonal decomposition D^b(X) = <D^b(A), O_X, O_X(1)> with A a finite-dimensional algebra, generalizing earlier nodal cases. The algebra A fits into a square-zero extension 0 → Hom(E, S_E^{-1}E[d-2]) → A → End(E) → 0, and in the split case it is a truncation of Keller's Calabi–Yau completion. The split case is established for many Fano varieties, including projective spaces, smooth quadrics, del Pezzo surfaces of degree > 4, del Pezzo threefolds of degree 5, and finite products thereof. As consequences, the paper obtains singularity-category equivalences D_sg(X) ≅ D_sg(A) and vanishing of K_{-1}(X). An appendix constructs explicit tilting objects on weighted projective spaces P(1^d,m), yielding singular equivalences for cyclic quotient singularities of type (1/m)(1^d).

Significance. If the main theorems hold, they give the first explicit finite-dimensional categorical absorption models for many higher-dimensional cone singularities and provide new Kawamata-type semiorthogonal decompositions in arbitrary dimension. The construction is parameter-free: the bimodule Hom(E, S_E^{-1}E[d-2]) is determined by the geometric exceptional collection, and no fitted constants appear. The paper is technically rich, with detailed proofs, many worked examples, and an independently valuable appendix on tilting objects for weighted projective spaces. However, as detailed below, the central algebra description and the resulting singularity equivalences currently rest on an unproved localization statement quoted from an unpublished preprint, so the overall result is conditional in its present form.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Proposition 3.9(3.34)] The proof of Proposition 3.9 establishes only the kernel equality (3.33). The crucial equivalence D_fg(B^•)/ker P_e ≅ D_fg(eB^•e) in (3.34) is explicitly stated to be shown in the forthcoming Jin–Yang–Zhou [28]. Corollary 3.11 uses this equivalence to identify the Verdier quotient \tilde A/ker π_* with D_fg(A^•), and this identification propagates to the main theorems: Theorem 1.3, Theorem 1.8, Corollary 5.10, Theorem 5.12, and Corollary 1.15. A functor with a prescribed kernel is not automatically a localization; full faithfulness and essential surjectivity require proof. The examples and the appendix provide supporting evidence but do not remove this dependency. This is an internal completeness gap, not a disagreement with consensus. I request that the authors either supply a full proof of (3.34) in this paper or explicitly state all theorems depending on it as conditional on [28].
  2. [§1.1, Theorems 1.3 and 1.8] The main theorems are stated unconditionally in the introduction, but their proofs depend on Proposition 3.9(3.34), which is quoted from an unpublished preprint. A reader cannot detect this dependency until §3.3. Even if the authors choose to defer the proof to [28], the statements of Theorems 1.3, 1.8, 1.10, and 1.12 should be explicitly qualified as conditional on (3.34), or the proof of (3.34) should be included. As written, the abstract and introduction overstate the current status of the results.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] Typographical errors: “equivalances”, “absorbtion”, “satisified”, “ismorphisms”, “correspnding”, “isomoprhism”, and “an an isomorphism” should be corrected. Also “The equivalence (3.34), is shown in [28]” contains an extra comma.
  2. [Proposition 3.9, proof] In the proof of the inclusion “⊆” in (3.33), the text says “Since K P D_fg(eB^•e)”, which appears to be a typo; it should be “K P D_fg(B^•)” to make the argument non-circular.
  3. [Example 1.4(c)] The two quivers for Z = P^1 × P^1 are drawn but not clearly labeled; please add vertex labels or describe the quivers in text to make the two choices unambiguous.
  4. [Lemma 4.16] The symbol E_i is used both for an exceptional sequence and for its endomorphism algebra; please use distinct notation, e.g. E_i for the sequence and E_i^{op} for the algebra, to avoid confusion.
  5. [Remark 1.13] The paper honestly notes that it is unknown whether non-split deformations occur geometrically. This limitation should be reflected in the introduction’s wording that “in general, the algebras are deformations of the split case”: this is a formal statement (Theorem 4.35), not a claim about geometric examples.
  6. [Appendix A.6] The statement “if m = d, then one can show that the algebra End(⊕_{l=1}^{d-1} G_{l,d,d})^{op} is given by the quiver with relations in Proposition 4.33 and Corollary 4.34” is asserted without proof in the appendix; please indicate where the proof is given or include a reference to the relevant section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central construction is parameter-free; the main external dependency [28] is an unproven localization lemma, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is essentially non-circular. The central algebra A is constructed geometrically as End(G) from the admissible subcategory \tilde A = <E, T E> in D^b(Y), with the square-zero ideal identified with Hom(E, S_E^{-1}E[d-2]) via Serre duality (Prop. 3.8, eqs. (3.26)-(3.28)); no fitted constant or target quantity is reused as an input. The KSOD of the cone is obtained by applying Efimov's Verdier localization theorem and the adherence criterion (Thm. 5.5, Cor. 5.7, Prop. 5.9), and the split description as a quotient of the preprojective algebra follows from Keller/Hanihara descriptions, not from the desired conclusion. The genuinely load-bearing step is Prop. 3.9(3.34), the localization equivalence D_fg(B^.)/ker P_e ≅ D_fg(eB^.e), attributed to the forthcoming [28]; the paper proves only the kernel equality (3.33) and explicitly defers (3.34). This is a dependency on an unverified external result and an omitted proof, but it is not circular: the statement is an independent localization theorem, not a restatement of the paper's inputs, and it is not a self-citation of the present authors. No 'prediction' is forced by a fit, no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation, and no known result is merely renamed. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction depends on standard derived-category machinery and on prior geometric input: projectively normal anticanonical embeddings and geometric exceptional collections for the Fano varieties in question. No numerical free parameters are introduced. The most fragile input is the unpublished Jin-Yang-Zhou localization equivalence. Definitions such as ACS-singularity and adherence organize the paper but postulate no new categorical or physical objects.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Projectively normal anticanonical embedding for all Fano varieties in the examples
    Needed to make the cone acyclic and the blow-up crepant (Theorem 5.1, Corollary 5.2); verified for listed Fanos in Example 5.3 using standard facts.
  • domain assumption Existence of full geometric exceptional collections of O_Z^K of type (m, d-1) for strong/very strong Fano Z
    This is part of Definition 1.1 and used throughout; examples are supplied from Beilinson, Kapranov, Orlov, Karpov-Nogin, and King.
  • domain assumption Proposition 3.9(3.34) (Jin-Yang-Zhou): localization equivalence for idempotent truncation of dg algebras
    Central to Corollary 3.11; the proof of the equivalence is deferred to the unpublished work [28].
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.7: lift of the exceptional collection to the crepant resolution Y restricts via i^! to an equivalence with O_E^K
    For projective cones this is proved (Theorem 5.5, Proposition 5.9); for general ACS-singularities it is assumed.
  • standard math Keller's dg-algebra theorem and Bondal-Kapranov exceptional-sequence inputs
    Used to turn generators into derived equivalences and to lift helix geometricity to algebra representation-infiniteness.
  • standard math Orlov's results on singularity categories and Verdier localization of blow-ups
    Used in Corollary 1.15 and Theorem 5.1 to pass from categorical decompositions to singularity equivalences.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Categorical absorptions of cone singularities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I4TKMWIN

@misc{pith2026260725406,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Categorical absorptions of cone singularities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I4TKMWIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25406}
}
abstract

We study Kuznetsov-Shinder's categorical absorption for certain cone singularities, generalizing their results for nodal singularities. In particular, we give explicit descriptions of the endomorphism algebras of tilting objects for categorical absorptions of cones over certain Fano varieties admitting a geometric exceptional sequence, in the sense of Bridgeland and Stern. In the simplest ``split case'', these algebras are truncations of certain Calabi-Yau completions in the sense of Keller. The split case occurs for anticanonical projective cones over many Fano varieties (like projective spaces, smooth quadrics, del Pezzo surfaces of degree greater than $4$, smooth del Pezzo threefolds of degree five, and finite products of these varieties). In general, the algebras are deformations of the split case. As a consequence, we obtain triangle equivalances between singularity categories of finite dimensional algebras and singularity categories of certain cone singularities, which also yields vanishing results in negative $\mathsf{K}$-theory. In a joint appendix with Yujiro Kawamata, we give an explicit description of tilting objects for weighted projective spaces $\mathbb{P}(1^d, m)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith

  1. [28]

    H. Jin, D. Yang, and G. Zhou, in preparation (2026)

    2026

  2. [65]

    Pavic and E

    N. Pavic and E. Shinder,K-theory and the singularity category of quotient singularities, Ann. K-Theory6(3), 381– 424 (2021)

    2021

  3. [1]

    Auroux, L

    D. Auroux, L. Katzarkov and D. Orlov,Mirror symmetry for weighted projective planes and their noncommutative deformations, Ann. of Math.167(2), no.3, 867–943 (2008)

    2008

  4. [2]

    Beilinson,Coherent sheaves onℙ n and problems in linear algebra, Funct

    A. Beilinson,Coherent sheaves onℙ n and problems in linear algebra, Funct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978), 214–216

    1978

  5. [3]

    Bondal and M

    A. Bondal and M. Kapranov,Representable functors, Serre functors, and reconstructions, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 53 (1989), no. 6, 1183–1205, 1337

    1989

  6. [4]

    Bondal and A

    A. Bondal and A. E. Polishchuk,Homological properties of associative algebras: the method of helices, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Mat.57(2), 3—50 (1993). English translation in Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math.42(2), 219–260 (1994)

    1993

  7. [5]

    Bondal and M

    A. Bondal and M. Van den Bergh,Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry, Mosc. Math. J. 3 (2003), no. 1, 1–36, 258

    2003

  8. [6]

    Bridgeland and D

    T. Bridgeland and D. Stern,Helices on del Pezzo surfaces and tilting Calabi–Yau algebrasAdv. Math., 224(4):1672– 1716, (2010). 23Note that in this example, we don’t need𝕜to be algebraically closed, since the simple module hask-dimension 1. 64 MARTIN KALCK AND NEBOJSA PA VIC

    2010

Show all 79 references
  1. [7]

    A. Buan, O. Iyama, I. Reiten and J. Scott,Cluster structure for 2-Calabi–Yau categories and unipotent groups, Com- pos. Math.145(4), 1035–1079 (2009)

    2009

  2. [8]

    Buchweitz,Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology over Gorenstein rings, preprint, Univ

    R.-O. Buchweitz,Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology over Gorenstein rings, preprint, Univ. Hannover, 1986

    1986

  3. [9]

    M. C. R. Butler and A. D. King,Minimal resolutions of algebras, J. Algebra,212(1):323–362, (1999)

    1999

  4. [10]

    Chen,The singularity category of an algebra with radical square zero, Doc

    X.-W. Chen,The singularity category of an algebra with radical square zero, Doc. Math.,16, 921–936 (2011)

    2011

  5. [11]

    Corti˜ nas, C

    G. Corti˜ nas, C. Haesemeyer, M. E. Walker, and C. Weibel,K-theory of cones of smooth varieties, J. Algebraic Geom.22(2013), no. 1, 13–34

    2013

  6. [12]

    Dolgachev,Weighted projective varieties, In: Group Actions and Vector Fields, Proc

    I. Dolgachev,Weighted projective varieties, In: Group Actions and Vector Fields, Proc. Polish– North Am. Semin., Vancouver 1981, Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 956, Springer-Verlag, pp. 34–71 (1982)

    1981

  7. [13]

    Gallego and B

    F. Gallego and B. Purnaprajna,Some results on rational surfaces and Fano varieties, J. reine angew. Math.538, 25–55 (2001)

    2001

  8. [14]

    Happel,Triangulated categories in the representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras, LMS Lecture Notes Series,119, Cambridge University Press, (1988)

    D. Happel,Triangulated categories in the representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras, LMS Lecture Notes Series,119, Cambridge University Press, (1988)

    1988

  9. [15]

    Hanihara,Cluster categories of formal DG algebras and singularity categories, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma (2022), Vol

    N. Hanihara,Cluster categories of formal DG algebras and singularity categories, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma (2022), Vol. 10:e35 1–50

    2022

  10. [16]

    ,Higher hereditary algebras and Calabi-Yau algebras arising from some toric singularities, arxiv:2412.19040

    arXiv

  11. [17]

    Hartshorne,Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52, Springer-Verlag, New-York, (1977)

    R. Hartshorne,Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52, Springer-Verlag, New-York, (1977)

    1977

  12. [18]

    Herschend, O

    M. Herschend, O. Iyama and S. Oppermann,n-representation infinite algebras, Adv. Math.252, 292–342 (2014)

    2014

  13. [19]

    Herschend, O

    M. Herschend, O. Iyama, H. Minamoto and S. Oppermann,Representation theory of Geigle-Lenzing complete in- tersections, arXiv:1409.0668v3 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Hille and M

    L. Hille and M. Van den Bergh,Fourier-Mukai Transforms, Handbook of tilting theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser.,332, 147–177 (2007)

    2007

  15. [21]

    Hochenegger, M

    A. Hochenegger, M. Kalck, and D. Ploog,Spherical subcategories in representation theory, Math. Z.,291(1-2), 113– 147 (2019)

    2019

  16. [22]

    Hochschild,On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra, Ann

    G. Hochschild,On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra, Ann. Math.,46(1), 58–67 (1945)

    1945

  17. [23]

    Hoshino, Y

    M. Hoshino, Y. Kato and J. Miyachi,On t-structures and torsion theories induced by compact objects, J. Pure Appl. Algebra,167, 15–35 (2002)

    2002

  18. [24]

    Huber and M

    A. Huber and M. Kalck,Dimension formulas for period spaces via motives and species, arxiv:2405.21053

    arXiv

  19. [25]

    Grant and O

    J. Grant and O. Iyama,Higher preprojective algebras, Koszul algebras, and superpotentials, Compositio Mathematica, 156(12), 2588–2627 (2020)

    2020

  20. [26]

    Iyama,Tilting Cohen–Macaulay representations, In Proc

    O. Iyama,Tilting Cohen–Macaulay representations, In Proc. of the ICM 2018, 125–162 (2018)

    2018

  21. [27]

    Iyama and S

    O. Iyama and S. Oppermann,Stable categories of higher preprojective algebras, Adv. Math.,244, 23–68 (2013)

    2013

  22. [29]

    Kalck,A new equivalence between singularity categories of commutative algebras, Adv

    M. Kalck,A new equivalence between singularity categories of commutative algebras, Adv. Math., vol.390, 107913 (2021)

    2021

  23. [30]

    Kalck, O

    M. Kalck, O. Iyama, M. Wemyss, D. Yang,Frobenius categories, Gorenstein algebras and rational surface singular- ities, Compositio Mathematica, vol.151, issue 03, 502–534 (2015)

    2015

  24. [31]

    Kalck and J

    M. Kalck and J. Karmazyn,Noncommutative Kn¨ orrer type equivalences via noncommutative resolutions of singular- ities, arXiv:1707.02836

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Kalck, C

    M. Kalck, C. Klapproth and N. Pavic,Obstructions to semiorthogonal decompositions for singular projective varieties II: Representation theory, arXiv:2404.07816

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Kalck, N

    M. Kalck, N. Pavic and E. Shinder,Obstructions to semiorthogonal decompositions for singular threefolds I: K-theory, Moscow Math. J.21(3), 567–592 (2021)

    2021

  27. [34]

    Kapranov,On the derived categories of coherent sheaves on some homogeneous spaces, Invent

    M. Kapranov,On the derived categories of coherent sheaves on some homogeneous spaces, Invent. Math. 92, no.3, 479–508 (1988)

    1988

  28. [35]

    Karmazyn, A

    J. Karmazyn, A. Kuznetsov and E. Shinder,Derived categories of singular surfaces, J. Eur. Math. Soc.24, 461–526 (2022). CATEGORICAL ABSORPTIONS OF CONE SINGULARITIES 65

    2022

  29. [36]

    Karpov and D

    B. Karpov and D. NoginThree-block exceptional sets on del Pezzo surfaces, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat.62no. 3, 429–463 (1998)

    1998

  30. [37]

    Kawamata,Equivalences of derived categories of sheaves on smooth stacks, Amer

    Y. Kawamata,Equivalences of derived categories of sheaves on smooth stacks, Amer. J. Math.126, 1057–1083 (2004)

    2004

  31. [38]

    (eds.) Recent Developments in Algebraic Geometry

    ,Semi-orthogonal decomposition of a derived category of a 3-fold with an ordinary double point, In: Abban, H., et al. (eds.) Recent Developments in Algebraic Geometry. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 478, pp. 183–215. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    ,On the derived category of a weighted projective threefold, Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, 2021

    2021

  33. [40]

    ,Semi-Orthogonal Decomposition and Smoothing, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo31(2024): 127–165

    2024

  34. [41]

    Keller,Derived categories and tilting, London Math

    B. Keller,Derived categories and tilting, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 332, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007), 49–109

    2007

  35. [42]

    Reine Angew

    ,Deformed Calabi-Yau completions, J. Reine Angew. Math.654(2011), 125–180, With an appendix by Michel Van den Bergh

    2011

  36. [43]

    Keller and I

    B. Keller and I. Reiten,Acyclic Calabi–Yau categories, Compos. Math.144(5), 1332–1348 (2008)

    2008

  37. [44]

    Keller, D

    B. Keller, D. Yang, G. Zhou,The Hall algebra of a spherical object, J. London Math. Soc. (2)80(2009), 771–784

    2009

  38. [45]

    Khovanov, L

    M. Khovanov, L. Rozansky,Matrix factorizations and link homology, Fund. Math., 199(1):1–91, 2008

    2008

  39. [46]

    King,Tilting bundles on some rational surfaces, unpublished, seehttps://people.bath.ac.uk/masadk/papers/ tilt.pdf

    A. King,Tilting bundles on some rational surfaces, unpublished, seehttps://people.bath.ac.uk/masadk/papers/ tilt.pdf

  40. [47]

    Koenig and D

    S. Koenig and D. Yang,Silting objects, simple-minded collections, t-structures and co-t- structures for finite dimen- sional algebras, Doc. Math.19, 403–438 (2014)

    2014

  41. [48]

    Koll´ ar and S

    J. Koll´ ar and S. Mori,Birational geometry of algebraic varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Math. 134, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998

    1998

  42. [49]

    Krause and D

    H. Krause and D. Kussin,Rouquier’s theorem on representation dimension, in: Trends in Representation Theory of Algebras and Related Topics. Contemp. Math., vol. 406, pp. 95–103. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2006)

    2006

  43. [50]

    Kuznetsov,Homological projective duality, Publ

    A. Kuznetsov,Homological projective duality, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci.105(1) 157–220 (2007)

    2007

  44. [51]

    ,Exceptional collections for Grassmannians of isotropic lines, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.97(3) 155–182 (2008)

    2008

  45. [52]

    ,Derived categories of families of sextic del Pezzo surfaces, Int. Math. Res. Not.,129262–9339 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    of the ICM 2014, 635–660

    ,Semiorthogonal decompositions in algebraic geometry, Proc. of the ICM 2014, 635–660

    2014

  47. [54]

    of the ICM 2022, 1154–1200

    ,Semiorthogonal decompositions in families, Proc. of the ICM 2022, 1154–1200

    2022

  48. [55]

    Kuznetsov and E

    A. Kuznetsov and E. Shinder,Categorical absorptions of singularities and degenerations, ´Epijournal G´ eom. Alg´ ebrique, (Special volume in honour of Claire Voisin) (2023)

    2023

  49. [56]

    (N.S.)31, no

    ,Homologically finite-dimensional objects in triangulated categories, Selecta Math. (N.S.)31, no. 2, Paper No. 27, 45 pp (2025)

    2025

  50. [57]

    Math.239, 377–430 (2025)

    ,Derived categories of Fano threefolds and degenerations, Invent. Math.239, 377–430 (2025)

    2025

  51. [58]

    Kuznetsov and M

    A. Kuznetsov and M. Smirnov,On residual categories for Grassmannians, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.120, 617–641 (2020)

    2020

  52. [59]

    Lekili and J

    Y. Lekili and J. Tevelev,Deformations of Kalck–Karmazyn algebras via Mirror Symmetry, arXiv: 2412.09724

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    Mart ´ ınez-Villa,Introduction to Koszul algebras, Revista de la Uni´ on Matem´ atica Argentina,48(2), 67–95, (2007)

    R. Mart ´ ınez-Villa,Introduction to Koszul algebras, Revista de la Uni´ on Matem´ atica Argentina,48(2), 67–95, (2007)

    2007

  54. [61]

    Orlov,Exceptional set of vector bundles on the varietyV 5

    D. Orlov,Exceptional set of vector bundles on the varietyV 5. Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh.5, 69–71 (1991)

    1991

  55. [62]

    Steklov Inst

    ,Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau-Ginzburg models, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 246(3), 227–248 (2004)

    2004

  56. [63]

    Math.197, 1827–1840 (2006)

    ,Triangulated categories of singularities and equivalences between Landau-Ginzburg models, Sb. Math.197, 1827–1840 (2006)

    2006

  57. [64]

    Math.226 (1), 206–217 (2011)

    ,Formal completions and idempotent completions of triangulated categories of singularities, Adv. Math.226 (1), 206–217 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Math.29(6): 1607–1632 (2025)

    ,Derived Categories of Nodal Del Pezzo Threefolds, Taiwanese J. Math.29(6): 1607–1632 (2025). 66 MARTIN KALCK AND NEBOJSA PA VIC

    2025

  59. [67]

    Proc., 24, Amer

    C.M.Ringel,The preprojective algebra of a quiver, Algebras and modules, II (Geiranger, 1996), 467–480, CMS Conf. Proc., 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1998

    1996

  60. [68]

    Rouquier,Dimensions of triangulated categories, J

    R. Rouquier,Dimensions of triangulated categories, J. K-Theory1(2), 193–256 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    Su and D

    H. Su and D. Yang,From simple-minded collections to silting objects via Koszul duality, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 22(1), 219–238 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    Tevelev and G

    J. Tevelev and G. Urz´ ua,Categorical aspects of the Koll´ ar–Shepherd-Barron correspondence, arXiv:2204.13225

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    The Stacks project authors,The Stacks project,https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Tomonaga,Weak del Pezzo surfaces yield 2-hereditary algebras and 3-Calabi-Yau algebras, arxiv:2510.26199

    R. Tomonaga,Weak del Pezzo surfaces yield 2-hereditary algebras and 3-Calabi-Yau algebras, arxiv:2510.26199

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    L. P. Thibault,Preprojective algebra structure on skew-group algebras, Adv. in Math.,365, 107033, (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Uehara,Exceptional collections on toric Fano threefolds and birational geometry, Internat

    H. Uehara,Exceptional collections on toric Fano threefolds and birational geometry, Internat. J. Math.25(07) (2014), 1450072

    2014

  67. [75]

    Verdier,Categories deriv´ ees, SGA 4 1/2, Lecture Notes in Math., v

    J.-L. Verdier,Categories deriv´ ees, SGA 4 1/2, Lecture Notes in Math., v. 569, Springer-Verlag, 1977

    1977

  68. [76]

    Wemyss,Flops and clusters in the homological minimal program, Invent

    M. Wemyss,Flops and clusters in the homological minimal program, Invent. Math.211(2018), 435–521

    2018

  69. [77]

    Xie,Derived categories of quintic del Pezzo fibrations, Sel

    F. Xie,Derived categories of quintic del Pezzo fibrations, Sel. Math. New Ser.27, 4 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Z.304, 48 (2023)

    ,Nodal quintic del Pezzo threefolds and their derived categories, Math. Z.304, 48 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    Yang, private communication, 2015

    D. Yang, private communication, 2015. University of Graz, Institut f ¨ur Mathematik und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Heinrichstraße 36, 8010 Graz, Austria Email address:martin.kalck@uni-graz.at Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.