Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Universal C$^{\ast}$-Algebras from Graph Products: Structure and Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new ambient C*-algebra built from graph products and right-angled Coxeter projections provides universal, nuclearity, exactness, simplicity, and unique-trace criteria for graph product C*-algebras.

desk verdict Solid and genuinely new ambient-algebra framework, but Theorem 3.12 is false as stated and needs added hypotheses before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12271 v1 pith:I5KTIMRF submitted 2025-07-16 math.OA math.FA

Mario Klisse This is my paper
classification math.OAmath.FA MSC 46L0546L09
keywords graphproductsofC*-algebrasambientright-angledCoxetergroupsnuclearityexactnesssimpleuniquetraceuniversalproperties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Graph products of C*-algebras interpolate between free products and tensor products, but their internal structure is hard to see. The paper attaches to every reduced graph product $A_\Gamma$ a larger ambient algebra $A(A,\Gamma)$ generated by $A_\Gamma$ together with projections $Q_v$ coming from the right-angled Coxeter group $W_\Gamma$. The ambient algebra has explicit universal properties, a gauge action, and a diagonal subalgebra, and it is nuclear or exact exactly when every vertex algebra is nuclear or exact. These tools yield new criteria for exactness, nuclearity, simplicity, and uniqueness of the trace on $A_\Gamma$ itself, several of which are new even for free products.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ambient algebra $A(A,\Gamma)=C^*\!(\{Q_v\}_{v\in V\Gamma}\cup A_\Gamma)$, where $Q_w$ is the orthogonal projection onto the subspace of the graph product Hilbert space spanned by words lying above $w$ in the weak Bruhat order of $W_\Gamma$. The dense *-subalgebra comprises elementary operators, products of creation, diagonal, and annihilation operators, and each nonzero elementary operator has a well-defined signature in $W_\Gamma$. The argument runs through a gauge action of the torus $\mathbb{T}^{V\Gamma}$, a faithful conditional expectation onto the diagonal subalgebra, fixed-point algebras identified with the subspaces $B_{n_1,\ldots,n_r}$, and the ideal $I(A,\Gamma)$ of operators vanishing at infinity; the signature map and topological freeness of the Coxeter action on its boundary provide the rigidity that makes $I(A,\Gamma)$ maximal.

What would settle it

Take $\Gamma$ to be the complete graph on two vertices and set each vertex algebra to $C(\mathbb{T})$ with Lebesgue measure; then $A_\Gamma = C(\mathbb{T})\otimes C(\mathbb{T})$, which admits many tracial states (for instance, products of Lebesgue measure), contradicting Theorem 3.12 as printed and confirming that the missing hypotheses are essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that adjoining the projections $Q_w$ indexed by the right-angled Coxeter group $W_\Gamma$ to the reduced graph product $A_\Gamma$ produces a C*-algebra $A(A,\Gamma)$ whose combinatorial structure controls the graph product itself. The paper proves a universal property for $A(A,\Gamma)$, shows that $A(A,\Gamma)$ is nuclear exactly when every vertex algebra is nuclear and exact exactly when every vertex algebra is exact, and constructs a canonical ideal $I(A,\Gamma)$ that is maximal under the hypotheses that $\Gamma$ has at least three vertices and its complement is connected. These facts are then applied to $A_\Gamma$: exactness passes from vertex algebras to the graph product, nuclearity passes under a compactness assumption, simplicity is characterized by vanishing of $A_\Gamma \cap I(A,\Gamma)$ under growth-series hypotheses, the inclusion into $A(A,\Gamma)/I(A,\Gamma)$ is C*-irreducible, and the canonical state is the unique tracial state when the vertex states are tracial. Several of these conclusions are new even for free products.

Load-bearing premise

The trace-uniqueness theorem (Theorem 3.12) is stated without the hypotheses its proof uses—at least three vertices and a connected complement graph—and it is false for a complete graph on two vertices with vertex algebra $C(\mathbb{T})$, so those omitted hypotheses are load-bearing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If every vertex algebra is exact, then $A_\Gamma$ is exact; if every vertex algebra is nuclear and contains the compact operators on its GNS space, then $A_\Gamma$ is nuclear.
  • Under the hypotheses $\#V\Gamma\geq 3$, connected complement, and the growth-series condition, $A_\Gamma$ is simple exactly when $A_\Gamma\cap I(A,\Gamma)=0$, and the inclusion $A_\Gamma\subset A(A,\Gamma)/I(A,\Gamma)$ is C*-irreducible.
  • Finite-dimensional vertex algebras with faithful states satisfying the growth-series condition give simple graph products, a statement that is new even in cases that reduce to free products.
  • When each vertex state is tracial and each vertex algebra contains a suitable unitary in the kernel of the state, the graph product state is the unique tracial state; the printed theorem omits the hypotheses its proof uses, so this conclusion requires $\#V\Gamma\geq 3$ and connected complement.
  • The universal property of $A(A,\Gamma)$ gives a new way to build homomorphisms from vertex-level data, which the paper uses to reduce structural questions about $A_\Gamma$ to questions about the ambient algebra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inductive fixed-point argument used for the universal property looks transferable: any C*-algebra generated by subalgebras with prescribed commutation and orthogonality relations may admit a similar decomposition into Hilbert-module compact operators.
  • The growth-series condition suggests a sharp threshold for simplicity: as the multi-parameter approaches the region of convergence of the Coxeter growth series, one should expect the ideal intersection to become nonzero; concrete Coxeter graphs could be tested to locate the boundary.
  • The ideal $I(A,\Gamma)$ may play the role of the compact operators even for infinite-dimensional vertex algebras, so the quotient $A(A,\Gamma)/I(A,\Gamma)$ could support K-theoretic or index-theoretic invariants for graph products.
  • Once the missing hypotheses are restored, the unique-trace theorem should specialize to known unique-trace results for free products and may extend to factoriality statements for the associated von Neumann algebras.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a family of ambient C*-algebras A(A,Γ) generated by a reduced graph product AΓ together with boundary projections Q_v coming from the associated right-angled Coxeter group. It proves universal properties for A(A,Γ), characterizes nuclearity and exactness of A(A,Γ) in terms of the vertex algebras, constructs a canonical ideal I(A,Γ), and applies these tools to obtain structural results for the original graph product: exactness and nuclearity criteria, simplicity criteria, and a trace-uniqueness theorem. The claimed results are parameter-free and the proofs are extensive; the construction generalizes the author's earlier Hecke-algebra framework and is presented as new even for free products.

Significance. If the issues below are repaired, the paper would make a substantial contribution: the ambient algebra is a natural and flexible object that packages a graph product with the combinatorics of the associated right-angled Coxeter group, and the nuclearity/exactness characterizations (Theorem 2.28) together with the universality theorems (2.18, 2.26) give clean and broadly applicable criteria. The simplicity and trace-uniqueness applications in Section 3 are conceptually interesting and appear to be new even for free products. The construction is self-contained in the sense that it does not fit parameters to examples; it relies on the author's earlier published results [37,38] as tools rather than as the target conclusions. However, two load-bearing statements are currently incorrect as printed, so the manuscript needs substantive revision before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Theorem 3.12] The statement of Theorem 3.12 drops the hypotheses used in its proof. Proposition 3.11, the key ingredient, is proved only under #VΓ ≥ 3 and connected complement Γ^c, and the theorem as printed is false without these assumptions. For Γ = K2, Av = C(T), ωv equal to Lebesgue measure, and uv = z, every hypothesis of Theorem 3.12(1) holds, yet AΓ ≅ C(T) ⊗ C(T) ≅ C(T²) and every probability measure on T² defines a distinct tracial state, so ωΓ is not unique. The same omission affects conclusion (2): for Γ = K2 with Av1 = C(T) (Lebesgue state) and Av2 = M2(C) with a faithful non-tracial state whose unitary X lies in its kernel, the algebra C(T) ⊗ M2(C) admits the tracial state Lebesgue ⊗ tr, contradicting the asserted absence of tracial states. The theorem should carry the hypotheses of Proposition 3.11, or else the disconnected-complement case must be handled separately via the tensor-product decomposition described in Section 3.2.
  2. [Lemma 2.8(3)] The first identity in Lemma 2.8(3) is false as written: it states a†(b†)* = d(ab*) + d(a)d(b*) for v = v'. Taking a = b = 1 in Av gives a† = Q_v Q_v^⊥ = 0, so the left-hand side is 0, while the right-hand side is Q_v + Q_v² = 2Q_v. The correct identity is a†(b†)* = d(ab*) − d(a)d(b*), since Q_v^⊥ = 1 − Q_v. This is not a purely cosmetic sign error: Lemma 2.20 and the algebraic decompositions leading to Proposition 2.21 and Theorem 2.18 use this relation, so the sign must be corrected and the downstream computations rechecked.
  3. [§2.2, Proposition 2.9 proof] In Case 4 of the proof of Proposition 2.9, the commuting case is printed with '(v, vi) ∈ EΓ^c', but Lemma 2.8(3) gives commutation only when (v, vi) ∈ EΓ, while on the complement the product is 0. This appears to be a typo, but since Proposition 2.9 provides the dense spanning set used throughout Section 2, the proof should be corrected and the surrounding statements checked for consistency.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 2.30] The reference to 'Theorem 2.14 (3)' for the conditional expectation onto D is incorrect; the expectation is constructed in Theorem 2.14(2).
  2. [Abstract and Section 3] The notation '#Γ' is used in Theorem E, Theorem 3.7, and Corollaries 3.9–3.10, while the body generally uses '#VΓ'; please make the notation uniform.
  3. [Introduction] There is a typo in the sentence 'C∗-irreducible inclusions have been introduced an studied by Rørdam'; it should read 'introduced and studied'.
  4. [Throughout] Please check the citations that attribute prior results: for example, the attribution of [16, Corollary 2.17] and the description of [9, Theorem H] should be verified against those papers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the ambient-algebra construction and its applications are proved by independent arguments, with prior self-citations serving as published external lemmas; the printed Theorem 3.12 has a separate missing-hypothesis correctness flaw that is not circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. A(A,Γ) is defined from the graph product AΓ plus the projection family (Qv), but every structural claim — Theorem 2.18's universal property, Theorem 2.28's nuclearity/exactness criterion, and Theorem 2.37's maximality of I(A,Γ) — is established through explicit subspace decompositions, fixed-point algebras, conditional expectations, and induction, not by assuming the conclusion. The applications to AΓ (Corollaries 3.1–3.2 and Theorems 3.7–3.12) transfer these independent properties. The paper's reliance on the author's prior work [37,38] is real evidence rather than circularity: [37, Theorem 3.19 and Proposition 3.25] and [38, Proposition 2.10] are published, parameter-free theorems whose stated assumptions do not include the present target results (trace uniqueness or simplicity of general graph products), so their use as lemmas does not make the outputs equivalent to the inputs by construction; Proposition 3.3 simply composes the state restriction with the isomorphism of Lemma 2.2 and applies that external lemma. The unique-trace proof in Theorem 3.12 does not import a uniqueness conclusion: it constructs an extension state via Proposition 3.11 and then directly computes that any reduced word has zero trace, so the conclusion follows from the computation rather than from the construction. Separately, and non-circularly, Theorem 3.12 as printed omits the hypotheses #VΓ ≥ 3 and connected complement Γc that its proof (via Proposition 3.11) requires; for example, Γ = K2 with Av = C(T) and Lebesgue state gives AΓ ≅ C(T^2), which has many tracial states. This is a correctness or statement flaw, not a circular-derivation flaw, and it does not enter the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters appear; all numerical hypotheses such as q_v are existential conditions rather than constants fitted to data. The construction rests on standard operator algebra results and, heavily, on the author's earlier published theorems [37,38], which are used as tools rather than assumed conclusions. The new objects A(A,Γ), I(A,Γ), and the signature map are definitions, not physical postulates, so they are not listed as invented entities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Reduced graph product C*-algebra AΓ with GNS-faithful state ωΓ exists for finite simplicial graphs and vertex algebras with GNS-faithful states (Caspers-Fima [16]).
    Used throughout Section 1 as the base object of the construction; accepted from prior literature.
  • domain assumption Right-angled Coxeter group WΓ acts topologically freely on its combinatorial boundary ∂(WΓ,SΓ) (Klisse [37, Proposition 3.25]).
    Used in Proposition 2.5 and Lemma 2.36 to construct elements avoiding finite sets of fixed points; critical for maximality of I(A,Γ).
  • domain assumption Growth series divergence criterion: if q is outside the closure of the region of convergence of the multivariate growth series, then q^{-1}_{w_i} φ(Q_{w_i}) → 0 along suitable sequences (Klisse [38, Proposition 2.10]).
    Imported to prove Proposition 3.3 and hence the state-construction in Proposition 3.5; central to the simplicity criteria.
  • standard math Coxeter groups are exact (Dranishnikov-Januszkiewicz [27], Brown-Ozawa [11]).
    Used in Proposition 2.35 to show the ideal I(A,Γ) equals the compact operators for finite-dimensional vertex algebras.
  • standard math Standard operator algebra facts including Tomiyama's theorem, fixed-point algebras of compact group actions, and nuclearity/exactness permanence (Brown-Ozawa [11]).
    Used pervasively in Sections 2.4 and 2.5, e.g. Theorem 2.14(2), Lemma 2.24, and the proof of Theorem 2.28.
  • standard math Hilbert C*-module compact operators: K(X) is isomorphic to the algebra of 'matrix units' for a Hilbert D-module X (Lance [40], Brown-Ozawa [11, Proposition 4.6.3]).
    Used to identify B_{n1,...,nL} with compact operators in the universality and nuclearity proofs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal C$^{\ast}$-Algebras from Graph Products: Structure and Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I5KTIMRF

@misc{pith2026250712271,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal C$^\ast$-Algebras from Graph Products: Structure and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I5KTIMRF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12271}
}
abstract

In this article, we introduce and investigate a class of C$^{\ast}$-algebras generated by reduced graph products of C$^{\ast}$-algebras, augmented with families of projections naturally associated with words in right-angled Coxeter groups. These ambient C$^{\ast}$-algebras possess a rich and tractable combinatorial structure, which enables the deduction of a variety of structural properties. Among other results, we establish universal properties, characterize nuclearity and exactness in terms of the vertex algebras, and analyze the ideal structure. In the second part of the article, we leverage this framework to derive new insights into the structure of graph product C$^{\ast}$-algebras -- many of which are novel even in the case of free products.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Metric Structures on Iwahori-Hecke Algebras

    math.OA 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The canonical filtration of a right-angled Iwahori-Hecke algebra satisfies the Ozawa-Rieffel Haagerup condition iff the graph of commuting generators has no induced square, yielding compact quantum metric spaces and p...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Anantharaman-Delaroche, On tensor products of group C ∗-algebras and related topics , Limits of graphs in group theory and computer science, 1-35, EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2009

    C. Anantharaman-Delaroche, On tensor products of group C ∗-algebras and related topics , Limits of graphs in group theory and computer science, 1-35, EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Archbold, J

    R. Archbold, J. Spielberg, Topologically free actions and ideals in discrete C ∗-dynamical systems, Proc. Edin- burgh Math. Soc. (2) 37 (1994), no. 1, 119–124

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Atkinson, On graph products of multipliers and the Haagerup property for C ∗-dynamical systems , Ergodic Theory Dynam

    S. Atkinson, On graph products of multipliers and the Haagerup property for C ∗-dynamical systems , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 40 (2020), no. 12, 3188–3216

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Avitzour, Free products of C∗-algebras, Trans

    D. Avitzour, Free products of C∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 271 (1982), no. 2, 423–435

    1982

  5. [5]

    Bj¨ orner, F

    A. Bj¨ orner, F. Brenti,Combinatorics of Coxeter groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 231. Springer, New York, 2005. xiv+363 pp. UNIVERSAL C ∗-ALGEBRAS FROM GRAPH PRODUCTS: STRUCTURE AND APPLICATIONS 43

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Blackadar, Operator algebras

    B. Blackadar, Operator algebras. Theory of C ∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras , Encyclopaedia Math. Sci., 122 Oper. Alg. Non-commut. Geom., III Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. xx+517 pp

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Borst, The CCAP for graph products of operator algebras , J

    M. Borst, The CCAP for graph products of operator algebras , J. Funct. Anal. 286 (2024), no. 8, Paper No. 110350, 41 pp

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Borst, M

    M. Borst, M. Caspers, Classification of right-angled Coxeter groups with a strongly solid von Neumann algebra , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 189 (2024), Paper No. 103591, 14 pp

    work page 2024

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Borst, M

    M. Borst, M. Caspers, E. Chen, Rigid Graph Products, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06171 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Borst, M

    M. Borst, M. Caspers, M. Wasilewski, Bimodule coefficients, Riesz transforms on Coxeter groups and strong solidity, Groups Geom. Dyn. 18 (2024), no. 2, 501–549

    2024

  3. [11]

    Brown, N

    N. Brown, N. Ozawa, C∗-algebras and finite-dimensional approximations , Graduate Studies in Mathematics,

  4. [12]

    P. E. Caprace, J. L´ ecureux,Combinatorial and group-theoretic compactifications of buildings, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61 (2011), no. 2, 619–672

    2011

  5. [13]

    Caspers, Connes embeddability of graph products , Infin

    M. Caspers, Connes embeddability of graph products , Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 19 (2016), no. 1, 1650004, 13 pp

    2016

  6. [14]

    Caspers, Absence of Cartan subalgebras for right-angled Hecke von Neumann algebras, Anal

    M. Caspers, Absence of Cartan subalgebras for right-angled Hecke von Neumann algebras, Anal. PDE 13 (2020), no. 1, 1–28

    2020

  7. [15]

    Caspers, E

    M. Caspers, E. Chen, Internal graphs of graph products of hyperfinite II 1-factors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05179 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Caspers, P

    M. Caspers, P. Fima, Graph products of operator algebras , J. Noncommut. Geom.11(2017), no.1, 367–411

    2017

  9. [17]

    Caspers, M

    M. Caspers, M. Klisse, N.S. Larsen, Graph product Khintchine inequalities and Hecke C ∗-algebras: Haagerup inequalities, (non)simplicity, nuclearity and exactness , J. Funct. Anal. (2021) 280, no. 1, 108795

    2021

  10. [18]

    Charlesworth, B

    I. Charlesworth, B. Collins, Matrix models for ε-free independence, Arch. Math. (Basel) 116 (2021), no. 5, 585–600

    2021

  11. [19]

    Charlesworth, D

    I. Charlesworth, D. Jekel, The atoms of graph product von Neumann algebras , arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09000 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Charlesworth, R

    I. Charlesworth, R. de Santiago, B. Hayes, D. Jekel, S.K. Elayavalli, B. Nelson, On the structure of graph product von Neumann algebras , arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08150 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Charlesworth, R

    I. Charlesworth, R. de Santiago, B. Hayes, D. Jekel, S.K. Elayavalli, B. Nelson, Random permutation matrix models for graph products , arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07350 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chifan, M

    I. Chifan, M. Davis, D. Drimbe, Rigidity for von Neumann algebras of graph product groups, I: structure of automorphisms, Anal. PDE 18 (2025), no. 5, 1119–1146

    2025

  15. [23]

    Chifan, M

    I. Chifan, M. Davis, D. Drimbe, Rigidity for von Neumann algebras of graph product groups II. Superrigidity results, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 24 (2025), no. 1, 117–156

    2025

  16. [24]

    Chifan, S

    I. Chifan, S. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, Cartan subalgebras in von Neumann algebras associated with graph product groups, Groups Geom. Dyn. 18 (2024), no. 2, 749–759

    2024

  17. [25]

    Chifan, R

    I. Chifan, R. de Santiago, W. Sucpikarnon, Tensor product decompositions of II1-factors arising from extensions of amalgamated free product groups , Comm. Math. Phys. 364 (2018), no. 3, 1163–1194

    2018

  18. [26]

    M. W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter groups, London Mathematical Society Monographs Series,

  19. [27]

    Dranishnikov, T

    A. Dranishnikov, T. Januszkiewicz, Every Coxeter group acts amenably on a compact space , Proceedings of the 1999 Topology and Dynamics Conference (Salt Lake City, UT) Topology Proc. 24 (1999), Spring, 135–141

    1999

  20. [28]

    Drimbe, S

    D. Drimbe, S. Vaes, W∗-correlations of II 1 factors and rigidity of tensor products and graph products , arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04691 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dykema, Simplicity and the stable rank of some free product C ∗-algebras, Trans

    K. Dykema, Simplicity and the stable rank of some free product C ∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), no. 1, 1--40

    1999

  22. [30]

    Dykema, Exactness of reduced amalgamated free product C∗-algebras, Forum Math

    K. Dykema, Exactness of reduced amalgamated free product C∗-algebras, Forum Math. 16 (2004), no. 2, 161–180

    2004

  23. [31]

    Dykema, D

    K. Dykema, D. Shlyakhtenko, Exactness of Cuntz-Pimsner C ∗-algebras, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 44 (2001), no. 2, 425–444

    2001

  24. [32]

    xvi+584pp

    Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008. xvi+584pp

    2008

  25. [33]

    E. R. Green, Graph products of groups , Diss. University of Leeds, 1990

    1990

  26. [34]

    Garncarek, Factoriality of Hecke-von Neumann algebras of right-angled Coxeter groups , J

    L. Garncarek, Factoriality of Hecke-von Neumann algebras of right-angled Coxeter groups , J. Funct. Anal. 270 (2016), no. 3, 1202--1219

    2016

  27. [35]

    Katsura, On C ∗-algebras associated with C ∗-correspondences, J

    T. Katsura, On C ∗-algebras associated with C ∗-correspondences, J. Funct. Anal. 217 (2004), no. 2, 366–401. 44 MARIO KLISSE

    2004

  28. [36]

    Hasegawa, Bass-Serre trees of amalgamated free product C ∗-algebras, Int

    K. Hasegawa, Bass-Serre trees of amalgamated free product C ∗-algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019, no. 21, 6529–6553

    2019

  29. [37]

    Klisse, Topological boundaries of connected graphs and Coxeter groups , J

    M. Klisse, Topological boundaries of connected graphs and Coxeter groups , J. Operator Theory89(2023), no.2, 429–476

    2023

  30. [38]

    Katsura, A class of C ∗-algebras generalizing both graph algebras and homeomorphism C ∗-algebras

    T. Katsura, A class of C ∗-algebras generalizing both graph algebras and homeomorphism C ∗-algebras. II. Ex- amples, Internat. J. Math. 17 (2006), no. 7, 791–833

    2006

  31. [39]

    T. Lam, A. Thomas, Infinite reduced words and the Tits boundary of a Coxeter group , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015, no. 17, 7690–7733

    2015

  32. [40]

    Klisse, Simplicity of right-angled Hecke C ∗-algebras, Int

    M. Klisse, Simplicity of right-angled Hecke C ∗-algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2023), no.8, 6598–6623

    2023

  33. [41]

    L´ ecureux,Amenability of actions on the boundary of a building , Int

    J. L´ ecureux,Amenability of actions on the boundary of a building , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2010, no. 17, 3265–3302

    2010

  34. [42]

    Lance, Hilbert C ∗-modules

    E. Lance, Hilbert C ∗-modules. A toolkit for operator algebraists , London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 210 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. x+130 pp

    1995

  35. [43]

    M lotkowski, Λ-free probability, Infin

    W. M lotkowski, Λ-free probability, Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 7 (2004), no. 1, 27–41

    2004

  36. [44]

    McClanahan, Simplicity of reduced amalgamated products of C ∗-algebras, Canad

    K. McClanahan, Simplicity of reduced amalgamated products of C ∗-algebras, Canad. J. Math. 46 (1994), no. 4, 793–807

    1994

  37. [45]

    S. Raum, A. Skalski, Factorial multiparameter Hecke von Neumann algebras and representations of groups acting on right-angled buildings , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 172 (2023), 265–298

    2023

  38. [46]

    Ozawa, Solid von Neumann algebras , Acta Math

    N. Ozawa, Solid von Neumann algebras , Acta Math. 192 (2004), no. 1, 111–117

    2004

  39. [47]

    Rørdam, Irreducible inclusions of simple C ∗-algebras, Enseign

    M. Rørdam, Irreducible inclusions of simple C ∗-algebras, Enseign. Math. 69 (2023), no. 3-4, 275–314

    2023

  40. [48]

    Roe, Lectures on coarse geometry, Univ

    J. Roe, Lectures on coarse geometry, Univ. Lecture Ser., 31 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI,

  41. [49]

    Voiculescu, Symmetries of some reduced free product C ∗-algebras, Operator algebras and their connections with topology and ergodic theory (Bu¸ steni, 1983), 556–588

    D. Voiculescu, Symmetries of some reduced free product C ∗-algebras, Operator algebras and their connections with topology and ergodic theory (Bu¸ steni, 1983), 556–588. Lecture Notes in Math., 1132 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. KU Leuven, Department of Mathematics, Celestijn...

    1983

  42. [50]

    Speicher, J

    R. Speicher, J. Wysocza´ nski,Mixtures of classical and free independence , Arch. Math. (Basel) 107 (2016), no. 4, 445–453

    2016

  43. [88]

    xvi+509 pp

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008. xvi+509 pp

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.