pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00086 · v1 · pith:IARFFMCQnew · submitted 2019-06-28 · 🧮 math.HO

Mentoring Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Mathematics Research Students: Junior Faculty Experiences

Jana L. Gevertz , Peter S. Kim , Joanna R. Wares This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 12:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.HO
keywords undergraduate researchjunior facultymentoringinterdisciplinary mathematicsresearch supervisiontime managementstudent projects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Junior faculty can successfully supervise undergraduate research in interdisciplinary mathematics by using structured approaches drawn from peer experiences.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to help junior faculty manage their time while supervising undergraduate research projects in interdisciplinary mathematical disciplines. It draws on the authors' own experiences with both summer full-time and academic-year part-time projects to address common challenges such as forming a research group, creating productive structures, selecting projects, and mentoring students effectively. A sympathetic reader would care because these strategies allow faculty to balance expanding responsibilities while ensuring benefits for students and themselves.

Core claim

By sharing their personal experiences, the authors provide practical guidance on navigating the complexities of undergraduate research supervision, including different project formats and student types, so that junior faculty can establish effective mentoring practices in interdisciplinary math.

What carries the argument

The collection of structures and strategies for time management, group formation, project selection, and student mentoring drawn from the authors' experiences.

If this is right

  • Junior faculty can form research groups that promote productivity.
  • Appropriate projects can be chosen for different student commitments.
  • Effective mentoring leads to benefits for all parties involved.
  • Time can be managed better amid other faculty responsibilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These strategies might be adapted to non-interdisciplinary math fields or other disciplines.
  • Implementing the suggested structures could be tested in new academic settings to measure time savings.
  • Similar experience-sharing articles could benefit faculty in other early-career challenges.

Load-bearing premise

The specific challenges and solutions from the three authors' experiences are representative and transferable to other junior faculty.

What would settle it

A survey or case study of junior faculty who apply these strategies versus those who do not, measuring project success rates and time spent.

read the original abstract

To be successful, junior faculty must properly manage their time in the face of expanding responsibilities. One such responsibility is supervising undergraduate research projects. Student research projects (either single or multi-student) can be undertaken as a full-time summer experience, or as a part-time academic year commitment. With many potential undergraduate research formats, and with different types of students, junior faculty may find challenges in forming their research group, establishing a structure that promotes student productivity, picking an appropriate project, or in effectively mentoring their students. This article draws from the authors' experiences to help junior faculty navigate these complexities so that all parties reap the benefits of undergraduate research in interdisciplinary mathematical disciplines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that junior faculty can successfully supervise undergraduate research projects (single or multi-student, summer or academic-year) in interdisciplinary mathematics by applying structures and strategies drawn from the authors' personal experiences with challenges in group formation, establishing productive frameworks, project selection, and mentoring.

Significance. If the shared strategies prove transferable, the work supplies practical, experience-based advice that could help early-career faculty balance mentoring duties with other responsibilities and improve outcomes for undergraduate researchers in mathematical disciplines.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the described experiences will enable junior faculty to 'navigate these complexities so that all parties reap the benefits' rests entirely on unvalidated anecdotal cases without reported project outcomes, student feedback, or comparative assessment, which is load-bearing for the utility of the guidance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The manuscript is explicitly framed as a reflective account of the authors' personal experiences rather than an empirical study, and we address the concern about the abstract's claims below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the described experiences will enable junior faculty to 'navigate these complexities so that all parties reap the benefits' rests entirely on unvalidated anecdotal cases without reported project outcomes, student feedback, or comparative assessment, which is load-bearing for the utility of the guidance.

    Authors: We agree that the current abstract language implies a stronger outcome than the anecdotal basis of the paper can support. The work is intended to share practical strategies drawn from the authors' experiences with group formation, project selection, and mentoring in interdisciplinary mathematics research. We will revise the abstract to qualify the claim, for example by stating that the described approaches 'may assist' junior faculty in navigating these issues based on our experiences, rather than asserting that all parties will necessarily reap the benefits. This change will better align the abstract with the reflective, experience-based character of the manuscript while preserving its intended utility as guidance for early-career faculty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain present; experiential narrative only

full rationale

The manuscript is an advice article drawing on three authors' personal mentoring experiences. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions, no uniqueness theorems, and no self-citations used to justify core claims. All content is direct narrative sharing of practices; the central claim is offered as illustrative rather than derived. No step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The recommendations rest entirely on the unverified personal experiences of the three authors with no external data, literature synthesis, or independent validation referenced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 835 out tokens · 51472 ms · 2026-05-25T12:37:17.442509+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Adams S . S., J. A. Davis , N. Eugene, K. Hoke , S. Narayan , and K. Smith

    work page

  2. [2]

    In Proceedings of the Conference on Promoting Undergraduate Research in Mathematics

    The Long- Term Undergraduate Research (LURE) Model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Promoting Undergraduate Research in Mathematics . 215-

    work page

  3. [3]

    Accessed 24 March 2015

    http://www.d.umn.edu/~jgallian/PURMweb/LURE.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Budden, M

    Bailey, B., M. Budden, M. Dorff , and U. Ghosh- Dastidar. 2009. Undergraduate Research: How Do We Begin? MAA Focus. January Edition: 14- 16

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    W., and J

    Bauer, K. W., and J. S. Benne tt, 20 03. Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J High Educ. 74: 210–230

    work page

  6. [6]

    Beier, J. C., J. L. Gevertz, and K. E. Howard. 2015. Building Context with Tumor Growth Modeling Projects in Differential Equations. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. 25(4): 297-325

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Callender, H. L. 2014. Keys to Successful Mentoring of Undergraduate Research Teams w ith an Emphasis in Applied Mathematics Research. Proceedings of the 6th annual International Symposium on Biomathematics and Ecology Education and Research, http://cas.illinoisstate.edu/ojs/index.php/beer/article/view/796. Accessed 24 March 2015. Page 25 of 27

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    K., and P

    Cooper, A. K., and P. S. Kim . 2014. A cellular automata and a partial differential equation model of tumour -immune dynamics and chemotaxis. In Eladdadi A ., P. Kim and D. Mallet (Eds.), Mathematical Models of Tumor - Immune System Dynamics. Springer Proceedi ngs in Mathematics & Statistics (vol. 107, pp. 21–46). New York: Springer

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Crivelli J . J., J. Foldes , P. S. Kim , and J. R. Wares. 2012. A mathematical model for cell cycle-specific cancer virotherapy. Journal of Biological Dynamics. 6(Suppl 1): 104-120

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Harrison, C

    Dunbar, D., M. Harrison, C. Mageeney, C. Catagnus, A. Cimo, C. Beckowski, and L. Ratmansky, 2012. The rewards and challenges of undergraduate peer mentoring in course -based research: student perspectives from a liberal arts institution. Perspect Undergrad Res Mentoring, 1: 1–8

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Caudill , M

    Gentile, L., L. Caudill , M. Fetea, et al . 2012. Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries in the First Year: A New Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors. Journal of College Science Teaching. 41(5): 44-50

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Haunsperger, D. 2008. A Break for Mathematics: An Interview with Joe Gallian. The College Mathematics Journal. 39(3): 174-190

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Pantano, M

    Hoke, K., A. Pantano, M. Zarrouk, and A. Zeleke. 2014. Institutional support for undergraduate research. Involve. 7(3): 355-362

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Kim, P. S. , J. J. Crivelli , I.-K. Choi , C.-O. Yun , and J. R. Wares. 2015. Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine - expressing virus therapeutics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 12(4): 841-858. Page 26 of 27

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Kirschner, D., and J. C. Panetta . 1998. Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor-immune interaction. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 37(3): 235-252

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    Kuznetsov, V. A., I. A. Makalkin, M. A. Taylor , and A. S. Perelson. 1994. Nonlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 56(2): 295-321

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    Kwembe, T. A., K. Leonard, and A. R. Pineda . 2014. Academic year undergraduate research: the CURM model. Involve. 7(3): 383-394

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Leonard, K. 2008. Adventures in Academic Year Undergraduate Research. AMS Notices. 55(11): 1422-1426

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning

    Lopatto, D., 2009. Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Nagda, B.A., S. R. Gregerman, J. Jonides , W. V. Hippel, J. S. Lerner, 1998. Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev High Educ. 22: 55–72

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Roberts, G. E. 2013. Conducting Mathematical Research with Undergraduates. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. 23(9): 785-797

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Russell, S. H., M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, 2007. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science 316: 548 – 549. Page 27 of 27

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Shah, A.B., K. A. Rejniak and, J.L. Gevertz (under review). Limiting the development of anti-cancer drug resistance in a spatial model of micrometastases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.03412v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Mentoring is sharing the excitement of discovery

    Vandermaas- Peeler, M., P. C. M iller, and T. Peeples, 2015. “Mentoring is sharing the excitement of discovery”: faculty perceptions of undergraduate research mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 23: 377 – 393

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Wares, J. R. , J. J. Crivelli, and P. S. Kim . 2014. Differential equation techniques for modeling a cycle -specific oncolytic virotherapeutic. In Eladdadi A., P. Kim and D. Mallet (Eds.), Mathematical Models of Tumor -Immune System Dynamics. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics (vol. 107, pp. 253– 275). New York: Springer

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Wares, J. R. , J. J. Crivelli, C.- O. Yun, I.- K. Choi, J. L. Gevertz, and P. S. Kim. 2015. Treatment strategies for combining immunostimulatory oncolytic virus therapeutics with dendritic c ell injection. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 12(6): 1237-1256

    work page 2015