Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantitative investigation of low-dose PET imaging and post-reconstruction smoothing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.10541 v1 pith:IBDERPNJ submitted 2021-03-18 physics.med-ph

classification physics.med-ph
keywords biasimageslow-dosepost-reconstructionfilterlesionsmalignantapplying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT brain scans of 50 patients with head and neck malignant lesions were employed to systematically assess the relationship between the amount of injected dose (10%, 8%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, and 1% of standard dose) and the image quality through measuring standard image quality metrics (peak-signal-to-noise-ration (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard uptake value (SUV) bias) for the whole head region as well as within the malignant lesions, considering the standard-dose PET images as reference. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of post-reconstruction Gaussian filtering on the PET images in order to reduce noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio at different low-dose levels. Significant degradation of PET image quality and tumor detectability was observed with a decrease in the injected dose by more than 5%, leading to a remarkable increase in RMSE from 0.173 SUV (at 5%) to 1.454 SUV (at 1%). The quantitative investigation of the malignant lesions demonstrated that SUVmax bias greatly increased in low-dose PET images (in particular at 1%, 2%, 3% levels) before applying the post-reconstruction filter, while applying the Gaussian filter on low-dose PET images led to a significant reduction in SUVmax bias. The SUVmean bias within the malignant lesions was negligible (less than 1%) in low-dose PET images; however, this bias increased significantly after applying the post-reconstruction filter. In conclusion, it is strongly recommended that the SUVmax bias and SUVmean bias in low-dose PET images should be considered prior to and following the application of the post-reconstruction Guassain filter, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools