Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

The Mid-infrared Emitting Jet in the Black Hole V404 Cygni in Quiescence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The mid-infrared excess of the black hole V404 Cygni is synchrotron radiation from a relativistic jet that persists into quiescence.

desk verdict First time-resolved 21 micron data for V404 Cyg, backed by a robust blackbody-size argument and a flat radio-mm-MIR index, makes a strong case for a quiescent jet; the deferred timing analysis is a real but minor caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20536 v2 pith:IBO2HTXT submitted 2025-06-25 astro-ph.HE

E. S. Borowski , R. I. Hynes , Q. Hunt , A. J. Tetarenko , R. M. Plotkin , T. Shahbaz , P. Gandhi , T. J. Maccarone
show 8 more authors
J. C. A. Miller-Jones C. O. Heinke A. W. Shaw T. D. Russell G. R. Sivakoff P. A. Charles E. V. Palaiologou P. Reig
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords V404CygniblackholeX-raybinariesmid-infraredjetsquiescenceJWSTtime-seriesphotometrysynchrotronradiationmulti-wavelengthcampaigndisk-jetconnection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents simultaneous JWST, ALMA, and ground-based observations of the quiescent black hole X-ray binary V404 Cygni, aimed at identifying the source of its long-known mid-infrared excess. It finds that the 21 µm emission varies dramatically on timescales of seconds, including a flare that rises by about 1 mJy in only 3.6 seconds. That fast rise limits the emitting region to a few light-seconds, far smaller than the accretion disk, and a blackbody of that size would vastly overproduce the observed optical flux. The combination of rapid variability, a flat radio-to-mid-infrared spectral index (α = 0.04 ± 0.01), and correlated variability across X-ray, optical, millimeter, and radio bands leads the paper to conclude that the emission is dominated by synchrotron radiation from a relativistic jet. This would be the first compelling detection of a mid-infrared jet in a quiescent black hole X-ray binary.

What carries the argument

The argument hinges on time-domain variability as a size probe, combined with a brightness-temperature test. The 3.6-second rise time of the 21 µm flare is treated as an upper limit on the emitting region's size, and a hypothetical blackbody of that diameter (≤3.6 light-seconds) is required to reproduce the dereddened 21 µm flux density of about 0.84 mJy. Since such a blackbody would radiate roughly 1 Jy in the optical band while only about 0.9 mJy is observed, the thermal hypothesis is excluded. This leaves synchrotron emission from a relativistic jet as the most likely mechanism, independently supported by the flat radio/mm/MIR spectral index and by correlated variability across wavelengths.

What would settle it

A high-cadence simultaneous optical observation during a bright 21 µm flare that measures an R-band flare of roughly 1 Jy (the flux a 3.6 light-second blackbody would radiate) would refute the synchrotron conclusion; alternatively, detecting linear polarization in the 21 µm emission would confirm synchrotron, while a null polarization result would challenge it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the 21 µm excess in V404 Cyg is produced by the same compact relativistic jet that gives rise to its flat radio spectrum, ruling out the accretion disk and circumbinary material as the dominant source. The key evidence is a large-amplitude mid-infrared flare observed with JWST that rose about 50% (roughly 1.0 mJy) in 3.6 seconds, constraining the emitting region to ≤3.6 light-seconds — more than an order of magnitude smaller than the estimated ~80 light-second disk size. Using this size limit and the adopted extinction (AV = 4.0), the authors show that a blackbody emitting the dereddened 21 µm flux would need a temperature of about 8 × $10^{5}$ K and would produce roughly 1 Jy of optical R-band light, while the observed optical increase was only about 0.9 mJy, ruling out a thermal origin by three orders of magnitude. The flat spectral index measured simultaneously from radio to millimeter to mid-infrared, together with correlated variability across all bands, points to partially self-absorbed synchrotron radiation from a jet. The paper concludes that this is the first compelling detection of a mid-infrared jet in a quiescent black hole X-ray transient.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on treating the 3.6-second rise time as a true upper limit on the emitting region's size and on the adopted AV=4.0 extinction correction; if the rise time is smeared by instrumental or geometric effects, or the extinction is inaccurate, the blackbody exclusion of a thermal source would weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The jet in V404 Cyg persists in quiescence, meaning relativistic outflows operate at Eddington ratios as low as about 5 × 10^-7 L_Edd, the level observed during this campaign.
  • The accretion disk and circumbinary material are ruled out as the dominant source of the mid-infrared excess at 21 µm and longer wavelengths, resolving a long-standing ambiguity in the Spitzer data.
  • The flat radio-to-mid-infrared spectral index places the jet's synchrotron self-absorption break at or above about 21 µm in quiescence, indicating that the same jet model that explains hard-state radio spectra can explain the mid-infrared emission.
  • Simultaneous multi-wavelength monitoring shows correlated X-ray, optical, mid-infrared, and millimeter variability, linking the jet's radiating electrons to the accretion inflow on second-to-minute timescales.
  • JWST time-series photometry at roughly 0.9-second resolution can recover flares that integration-level data smooths out, making it a viable tool for studying the innermost jet regions of other quiescent black holes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension of the size constraint is that the flaring mid-infrared emission originates within a few light-seconds of the black hole, so coordinated sub-second near-infrared and X-ray monitoring could probe the same electron population responsible for the X-ray variability.
  • If the flat radio-to-mid-infrared spectrum persists in other quiescent BHXRTs, the 21 µm break frequency could serve as a jet-strength indicator, letting JWST measure how jet power scales with accretion rate across the quiescent population.
  • The brightness-temperature argument could be applied to other Spitzer-detected mid-infrared excess systems: any that show similar second-timescale flares would also be jet candidates, while those with only slow variability would remain consistent with disk winds or circumbinary material.
  • The paper's energetics estimate assumes equipartition and a single discrete ejection; a more realistic internal-shock model might reconcile the synchrotron cooling time with the 3.6-second rise time, a testable theoretical follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents simultaneous JWST/MIRI 21 µm time-series observations, ALMA 97.5 GHz, VLA 6 GHz, GTC/HiPERCAM and Skinakas optical, and Chandra/XMM-Newton X-ray data of the quiescent black hole X-ray binary V404 Cygni. The authors report large-amplitude 21 µm variability including a flare that rises by ~1 mJy in 3.6 s, a flat radio/mm/MIR spectral index α = 0.04 ± 0.01, and apparent correlated variability across bands. They argue that the MIR excess at and longward of 21 µm is dominated by synchrotron radiation from a relativistic jet persisting into quiescence, ruling out the accretion disk or circumbinary material as the dominant contributor. The paper claims the first compelling detection of an MIR jet in a quiescent BHXRT.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides the first direct evidence that compact relativistic jets persist to very low Eddington ratios in stellar-mass black holes, strengthening the disk-jet connection and demonstrating the utility of JWST for studying quiescent BHXRTs. The strength of the paper lies in the simultaneous multi-wavelength dataset, the careful handling of JWST calibration issues, the group-level light-curve reduction that captures sub-second variability, and the direct measurement of a flat radio/mm/MIR spectral index. The three proposed independent lines of evidence (rapid variability, flat SED, correlated multi-wavelength variability) are compelling in principle. However, as detailed below, one of these lines contains a serious quantitative error, and another is not yet statistically quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 and Section 5] The blackbody calculation is numerically incorrect. For a source of diameter 3.6 light-seconds at 2.226 kpc, the angular diameter is ~1.6e-14 rad and the solid angle is ~2e-28 sr. To produce the claimed dereddened 21 µm flux of ~0.84 mJy from such a source requires a brightness temperature of ~7e13 K, not ~8e5 K as stated. Conversely, a blackbody at 8e5 K with diameter 3.6 light-seconds would produce a 21 µm flux of ~10^-15 mJy, far below the observed value. The predicted R-band flux of ~1 Jy is similarly inconsistent; for the stated size and temperature the R-band flux would be ~10^-3 mJy, while for the corrected brightness temperature it would be tens of janskys. This is a load-bearing error because the thermal-exclusion argument rests on these numbers. The authors should correct the calculation or replace it with the brightness-temperature/Compton-limit argument (T_b > ~10^12 K), which would still exclude a thermal origin.
  2. [Section 3 and Section 5] The paper repeatedly invokes correlated variability as supporting the jet origin, but no quantitative measure of correlation is provided. Section 3 states that 'intense variability strongly correlated across the electromagnetic spectrum is clearly present' and Section 4 refers to 'apparent correlations', yet the timing analysis is deferred to a future study. The conclusion nonetheless lists 'correlated variability across all observed wavelengths, especially the mm band' as support. Without a correlation coefficient, significance level, or at least a defined feature-by-feature comparison, this line of evidence is not established. Please provide a quantitative correlation analysis for the key features (e.g., the first flare and the feature near BJDTDB−60231.5 ≈ 0.475) or explicitly temper the conclusion to state that the variability is 'consistent with' rather than 'supports' a jet origin.
  3. [Section 3, spectral index sentence] The quoted radio/mm/MIR spectral index α = 0.04 ± 0.01 is a central piece of evidence, but the fitting procedure is not described. The paper does not state how many data points were used, how the simultaneous portions were defined, how the fit was performed, or how the uncertainty (including absolute calibration errors) was propagated. Given that only three bands are involved and the paper itself adds 5% calibration uncertainties for the SED confidence region, a quoted 1σ uncertainty of 0.01 appears overprecise. Please specify the fit method, the exact flux densities used, and the treatment of calibration systematics so that the flat-spectrum claim is verifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1] The y-axis scale of the Skinakas R_C panel appears to be 0.20–0.25 mJy, yet the text states a dereddened R-band increase of ~0.9 mJy. Please clarify whether the 0.9 mJy is after dereddening and thus not directly visible on the observed-scale plot, or whether the figure scale is mislabeled.
  2. [Section 4] The phrase 'the flux density increases by about 50% (~1.0 mJy) over just 3.6 seconds' is ambiguous: a 50% increase from the mean flux would be ~0.2 mJy. Please state the start and end flux densities of the rise explicitly.
  3. [Table 1] The table header lists 'Flux Density (mJy)' while the footnote states the values are dereddened; this is inconsistent with the text in Section 2.1 that reports the 'mean observed 21 µm flux density during the TSO was ≈ 0.42 mJy'. Please clarify in the header whether the listed values are observed or dereddened, and specify the extinction correction applied at 21 µm.
  4. [Section 4, energetics paragraph] The estimate of the 'maximum available accretion kinetic power' uses L_trans = 0.02 L_Edd but does not explicitly define L_Edd for the adopted black hole mass of 9.0 M☉; please state the value used.
  5. [Section 2.5] The description of the contaminating-star subtraction is repeated in nearly identical wording for the HiPERCAM and Skinakas reductions; consider consolidating to avoid redundancy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MIR-jet conclusion is an observational inference supported by independent variability, spectral-index, and blackbody arguments, with self-citations only contextual.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that the 21 µm excess in V404 Cyg is dominated by jet synchrotron radiation is derived from direct observational evidence rather than from a fitted or self-referential construction. The flat radio/mm/MIR spectral index α = 0.04 ± 0.01 is measured from simultaneous VLA, ALMA, and JWST fluxes (Section 3), not generated by the jet model. The blackbody exclusion argument (Section 4) takes the observed 3.6 s rise time as a causal size upper limit of 3.6 light-seconds and compares the predicted ~1 Jy R-band flux from a ≤3.6 light-second, ~8×10^5 K blackbody with the observed ~0.9 mJy dereddened R-band increase; the three-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy is an independent falsification, and the extinction law used (Cardelli et al. 1989) is external. The correlations with radio/mm variability are presented as apparent and explicitly deferred to future timing work, so they do not constitute a fitted prediction. The energetics calculation in Appendix A assumes a synchrotron jet and therefore cannot bootstrap the detection claim; it is a supplementary consistency check. Self-citations (e.g., Hynes et al. 2009 for A_V and disk size, Gallo et al. 2005 for the established radio jet) provide contextual parameters or external consensus and are not load-bearing: even if those values were revised, the blackbody argument and measured spectral index would still support the nonthermal/synchrotron interpretation. No self-definitional, fitted-input, uniqueness-importing, or ansatz-smuggling step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or fitted free parameters are introduced. The central claim rests on standard astrophysical interpretations (jet synchrotron model, causality of variability, jet origin of quiescent radio) and adopted external parameters (extinction, distance). The ancillary energy estimate assumes an opening angle and equipartition but does not support the main claim.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Radio emission from quiescent V404 Cyg arises from a compact jet (Gallo et al. 2005, cited in Sections 1 and 4).
    The argument that ALMA 97.5 GHz and JWST 21 micron emission trace the same jet component assumes the radio anchor itself is jet emission; this is consensus for quiescent BHXRTs but is external to this paper.
  • domain assumption The 3.6-second rise time of the 21 micron flare sets an upper limit on the emitting-region size, c times the rise time (Section 4, first paragraph).
    Standard causality argument for variability; assumed in the blackbody brightness-temperature exclusion.
  • domain assumption Flat or slightly inverted spectra from radio to infrared are produced by partially self-absorbed synchrotron emission from a jet (Blandford and Koenigl 1979, Sections 1 and 4).
    Standard jet model used to interpret alpha=0.04+/-0.01 as jet emission.
  • domain assumption Optically thin X-ray luminosity scales as L_X proportional to Mdot^2 with a state-transition threshold at 0.02 L_Edd (Section 4, energetics paragraph).
    Used only to argue the jet power demand is less than 10 percent of available accretion power; not required for the central claim.
  • domain assumption The adopted interstellar extinction AV=4.0, RV=3.1 for dereddening MIR and optical fluxes (Sections 2.1 and 3, from Hynes et al. 2009).
    Affects absolute dereddened fluxes and the optical comparison in the blackbody exclusion; taken from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Mid-infrared Emitting Jet in the Black Hole V404 Cygni in Quiescence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IBO2HTXT

@misc{pith2026250620536,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Mid-infrared Emitting Jet in the Black Hole V404 Cygni in Quiescence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IBO2HTXT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20536}
}
abstract

Observations of some quiescent black hole X-ray binaries have revealed an excess of mid-infrared (MIR) emission above that expected from their donor stars. In one system, V404 Cygni, this excess has been variously suggested to arise from the accretion disk, circumbinary material, or a compact relativistic jet. Here we present simultaneous James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), and complementary multi-wavelength observations undertaken to resolve this uncertainty. We observed large-amplitude 21 $\mu$m variability on short timescales with JWST, particularly a dramatic flare which swiftly rose to $\approx2.4$ mJy, over 10 times the lowest observed MIR flux density. Similar variability was simultaneously observed from radio to X-ray wavelengths with other facilities throughout the campaign. This variability and the flat radio/mm/MIR spectral index ($\alpha = 0.04 \pm 0.01$) suggest that the MIR excess at and longward of 21 $\mu$m in V404 Cyg does not arise from the accretion disk or circumbinary material. Instead, the emission at 21 $\mu$m is dominated by synchrotron radiation from a jet which persists into quiescence. This result reinforces the ubiquity of the disk-jet connection in accreting black holes across a range of masses and accretion rates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20536 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light curves from our multi-wavelength observational campaign. (a) JWST group-level light curve showing detailed view of the large MIR flare. (b) VLA light curve. (c) ALMA light curve. (d) JWST integration-level light curve. (e) Skinakas Observatory and GTC HiPERCAM light curves. (f) XMM-Newton and Chandra light curves. Correlated variability is present throughout, particularly during the large MIR flare and about h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The radio to MIR average SED of V404 Cyg in￾cluding the Spitzer observations from 2006 for comparison. The MIR flux densities have been corrected for interstellar extinction as described in the text. The solid gray line is a model stellar atmosphere representing the secondary star (adopted from R. I. Hynes et al. 2009). The error bars rep￾resent statistical uncertainties only, and in most cases are smaller than the … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., et al

    Alfonso-Garz´ on, J., S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, C., Charles, P. A., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A110, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834102

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834102 2018

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17 12

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    M., & Motta, S

    Belloni, T. M., & Motta, S. E. 2016, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 440, Astrophysics of Black Holes: From Fundamental Aspects to Latest Developments, ed. C. Bambi, 61, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-52859-4 2

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-52859-4 2016

  4. [4]

    Bernardini, F., & Cackett, E. M. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2771, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu140

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu140 2014

  5. [5]

    D., & K¨ onigl, A

    Blandford, R. D., & K¨ onigl, A. 1979, ApJ, 232, 34, doi: 10.1086/157262

    doi:10.1086/157262 1979

  6. [6]

    K., Hynes, R

    Bradley, C. K., Hynes, R. I., Kong, A. K. H., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, 427, doi: 10.1086/520323

    work page doi:10.1086/520323 2007

  7. [7]

    J., Parsons, S

    Brown, A. J., Parsons, S. G., Littlefair, S. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3050, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1047

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1047 2022

  8. [8]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    doi:10.1086/167900 1989

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    A., & Naylor, T

    Casares, J., Charles, P. A., & Naylor, T. 1992, Nature, 355, 614, doi: 10.1038/355614a0

    1992 doi

  2. [10]

    A., Naylor, T., & Pavlenko, E

    Casares, J., Charles, P. A., Naylor, T., & Pavlenko, E. P. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 834, doi: 10.1093/mnras/265.4.834

    1993 doi

  3. [11]

    2015, A&A, 583, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526524

    Chen, W.-C., & Li, X.-D. 2015, A&A, 583, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526524

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    2019, ApJL, 876, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b44

    Chen, W.-C., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2019, ApJL, 876, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b44

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.14933753

    Cortes, P., Carpenter, J., Kameno, S., et al. 2025, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.14933753

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    T., Moldon, J., Miller-Jones, J

    Deller, A. T., Moldon, J., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/13

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al

    Dhillon, V. S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 350, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2130 EHT MWL Science Working Group, Algaba, J. C.,

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    2021, ApJL, 911, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abef71

    Anczarski, J., et al. 2021, ApJL, 911, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abef71

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed

    Fender, R. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, Vol. 39, 381–419, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303339

    2006 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fender, R. P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 31, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04080.x

    2001

  11. [19]

    P., Schlafly, E

    Finkbeiner, D. P., Schlafly, E. F., Schlegel, D. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 66, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/66

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    P., & Hynes, R

    Gallo, E., Fender, R. P., & Hynes, R. I. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1017, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08503.x

    2005

  14. [22]

    P., Miller-Jones, J

    Gallo, E., Fender, R. P., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1351, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10560.x

    2006

  15. [23]

    2007, ApJ, 670, 600, doi: 10.1086/521524

    Gallo, E., Migliari, S., Markoff, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 600, doi: 10.1086/521524

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    S., Byrom, J., et al

    Gandhi, P., Borowski, E. S., Byrom, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 1385, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf036 Gonz´ alez Hern´ andez, J. I., Rebolo, R., & Casares, J. 2012, ApJL, 744, L25, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/744/2/L25 Gonz´ alez Hern´ andez, J. I., Rebolo, R., & Casares, J. 2014, MNRA...

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Misselt, K

    Gordon, K. D., Misselt, K. A., Bouwman, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    M., & Johnston, K

    Hjellming, R. M., & Johnston, K. J. 1988, ApJ, 328, 600, doi: 10.1086/166318

    1988 doi

  19. [27]

    I., Bradley, C

    Hynes, R. I., Bradley, C. K., Rupen, M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 2239, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15419.x

    2009

  20. [28]

    I., Charles, P

    Hynes, R. I., Charles, P. A., Garcia, M. R., et al. 2004, ApJL, 611, L125, doi: 10.1086/424005

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    S., & Robinson, E

    Khargharia, J., Froning, C. S., & Robinson, E. L. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1105

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    Longair, M. S. 1994, High energy astrophysics. Vol.2: Stars, the galaxy and the interstellar medium, Vol. 2

    1994

  23. [31]

    Maccarone, T. J. 2003, A&A, 409, 697, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031146

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    A., Schlafly, E

    Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 299, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1144

    Malzac, J. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 299, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1144

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    A., Gallo, E., et al

    Markoff, S., Nowak, M. A., Gallo, E., et al. 2015, ApJL, 812, L25, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L25

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    E., & Remillard, R

    McClintock, J. E., & Remillard, R. A. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der

    2006

  28. [36]

    39, 157–213, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0306213

    Klis, Vol. 39, 157–213, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0306213

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    2007

  30. [38]

    2005, Ap&SS, 300, 45, doi: 10.1007/s10509-005-1183-x

    Merloni, A., Heinz, S., & Di Matteo, T. 2005, Ap&SS, 300, 45, doi: 10.1007/s10509-005-1183-x

    2005 doi

  31. [39]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Jonker, P. G., Dhawan, V., et al. 2009, ApJL, 706, L230, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L230 Mu˜ noz-Darias, T., Casares, J., Mata S´ anchez, D., et al. 2016, Nature, 534, 75, doi: 10.1038/nature17446

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    P., & Mauerhan, J

    Muno, M. P., & Mauerhan, J. 2006, ApJL, 648, L135, doi: 10.1086/507990 13

    2006 doi

  33. [41]

    1995, ApJ, 452, 710, doi: 10.1086/176343

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1995, ApJ, 452, 710, doi: 10.1086/176343

    1995 doi

  34. [42]

    A., & Butler, B

    Perley, R. A., & Butler, B. J. 2017, ApJS, 230, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    M., Bahramian, A., Miller-Jones, J

    Plotkin, R. M., Bahramian, A., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 3784, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab644

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Gallo, E., & Jonker, P

    Plotkin, R. M., Gallo, E., & Jonker, P. G. 2013, ApJ, 773, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/59

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Miller-Jones, J

    Plotkin, R. M., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab01cc

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Miller-Jones, J

    Plotkin, R. M., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Gallo, E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/104

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    Prabu, S., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2570

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    2016, ApJ, 821, 103, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/103 SAS development team

    Rana, V., Loh, A., Corbel, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 103, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/103 SAS development team. 2014, SAS: Science Analysis System for XMM-Newton observatory,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1404.004

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    W., Kaplan, D

    Shaw, A. W., Kaplan, D. L., Gandhi, P., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8eb1

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191, doi: 10.1086/131977

    1987 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Casella, P., Miller-Jones, J

    Tetarenko, A. J., Casella, P., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2987, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz165

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Casella, P., Miller-Jones, J

    Tetarenko, A. J., Casella, P., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 3862, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab820

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  46. [54]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt124

    Veledina, A., Poutanen, J., & Vurm, I. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt124

    2013 doi

  47. [55]

    2018, ApJ, 859, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe91

    Xu, X.-T., & Li, X.-D. 2018, ApJ, 859, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe91

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.23918, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.23918

    Zuo, Z., Cugno, G., Michail, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.23918, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.23918

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.