pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16609 · v1 · pith:ICJEHOINnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 📡 eess.SP

Uplink Channel Estimation for Multi-User MISO Systems Assisted by a Fluid Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface

Amarilton L. Magalh\~aes , Andr\'e L. F. de Almeida , George C. Alexandropoulos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 21:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords channel estimationfluid reconfigurable intelligent surfacetensor modelingmulti-user MISOuplinkphase coefficientsposition uncertainty
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor modeling gives a closed-form estimator for joint channel and motion-phase recovery in fluid RIS uplink systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper addresses channel estimation for multi-user wireless systems that use fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, where reflecting elements can move among preset positions on a grid. Position mismatches from motion or calibration create extra phase shifts that degrade channel state information. The authors introduce a two-time-scale configuration protocol that separates reflection phase changes from element motion, then model the received uplink pilot signals as a tensor. Capitalizing on orthogonal pilots across users, they obtain a closed-form solution that recovers both the individual user channels and the motion-induced phase coefficients simultaneously. Numerical tests confirm the estimator maintains useful accuracy even when element positions deviate from their intended locations.

Core claim

By capitalizing on orthogonal pilot sequences and tensor modeling, we derive a closed-form solution that jointly estimates the individual channels and the motion-induced phase coefficients in a multi-user FRIS-assisted uplink system under a two-time-scale FRIS configuration protocol.

What carries the argument

Tensor modeling of the received pilot signals under the two-time-scale protocol, which isolates motion-induced phase coefficients as multiplicative factors alongside the cascaded channels.

If this is right

  • The closed-form solution supplies usable channel state information without requiring exact prior knowledge of element positions.
  • The approach maintains performance for multi-user MISO uplinks when element motion is present but unknown.
  • Joint estimation of channels and phase coefficients occurs within a single pilot phase rather than separate calibration steps.
  • The tensor structure allows the method to exploit the additional spatial diversity offered by fewer physical elements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tensor-plus-orthogonal-pilot structure could be tested for downlink channel estimation or for fluid surfaces with different motion patterns.
  • If the phase-only mismatch model holds, similar closed-form derivations may apply to other movable-antenna or fluid-antenna architectures.
  • The two-time-scale separation suggests a general way to manage multiple dynamic degrees of freedom in surface-assisted links.

Load-bearing premise

Position mismatches affect the channels only through additive phase coefficients without changing amplitudes or other statistics, and the two-time-scale protocol cleanly separates reflection phase-shift dynamics from element-motion dynamics.

What would settle it

A simulation or measurement in which the closed-form estimator produces channel estimates whose error does not decrease as predicted when known position deviations are inserted into the received-signal model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16609 by Amarilton L. Magalh\~aes, Andr\'e L. F. de Almeida, George C. Alexandropoulos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System sketch. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 SNR [dB] 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 NMSE of the combined channel Case i) KRF using ideal T Case i) LS using ideal T Case ii) Joint T,G,H est. (proposed) Case ii) KRF using mismatched T Case ii) LS using mismatched T Static RIS [13] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (FRISs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for wireless communications, wherein the reflecting elements can dynamically select their effective radiating positions from a dense preset grid, thereby introducing an additional degree of freedom. In contrast to conventional RIS architectures, FRISs can achieve spatial diversity with fewer physical elements. However, beyond the cascaded channel structure, FRIS-assisted systems are also affected by uncertainties arising from element-position mismatches caused by calibration inaccuracies or motion errors, which may degrade channel state information. To the best of our knowledge, channel estimation (CE) for FRIS-assisted systems under position uncertainty remains unexplored. To fill this gap, we propose a CE framework for a multi-user FRIS-assisted uplink system based on a two-time-scale FRIS configuration protocol that captures both reflection phase-shift and element-motion dynamics. By capitalizing on orthogonal pilot sequences and tensor modeling, we derive a closed-form solution that jointly estimates the individual channels and the motion-induced phase coefficients. Numerical results demonstrate notable performance in the presence of unknown position deviations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a channel estimation framework for multi-user MISO uplink systems assisted by a fluid reconfigurable intelligent surface (FRIS) under element-position uncertainties. It introduces a two-time-scale FRIS configuration protocol separating reflection phase-shift and element-motion dynamics, then derives a closed-form joint estimator for individual user channels and motion-induced phase coefficients by exploiting orthogonal pilots and tensor modeling of the received signals. Numerical results are reported to show performance under unknown position deviations.

Significance. If the closed-form derivation is valid and the position-mismatch model holds, the work fills a gap in FRIS channel estimation by providing an efficient, non-iterative solution that jointly recovers channels and phase coefficients. The tensor-based approach leveraging orthogonal pilots could reduce overhead compared to conventional cascaded-channel estimators, particularly for systems using fewer physical elements to achieve spatial diversity.

major comments (1)
  1. The central closed-form solution (derived from the received-signal model under the two-time-scale protocol) assumes that element-position mismatches manifest exclusively as multiplicative phase coefficients inside the tensor slices, without perturbing amplitudes or array-response vectors. If realistic motion or calibration errors also alter path-loss terms or effective array responses, the tensor rank and subsequent decomposition no longer isolate the desired quantities, biasing the estimator. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the joint-estimation claim and requires explicit robustness analysis or additional simulations with amplitude perturbations.
minor comments (3)
  1. Numerical results section: performance claims lack error bars, explicit comparison baselines (e.g., against conventional RIS estimators or iterative methods), and details on simulation parameters such as number of users, RIS grid size, SNR range, and number of Monte Carlo trials.
  2. Clarify notation for the tensor slices and the exact mapping from the two-time-scale protocol to the received-signal model; ensure all steps of the closed-form derivation are explicitly numbered and cross-referenced.
  3. Abstract: replace the qualitative phrase 'notable performance' with at least one quantitative metric (e.g., NMSE improvement at a specific SNR) to better convey the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. Below we address the major comment point by point, providing clarifications on our modeling assumptions and indicating revisions incorporated in the updated version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central closed-form solution (derived from the received-signal model under the two-time-scale protocol) assumes that element-position mismatches manifest exclusively as multiplicative phase coefficients inside the tensor slices, without perturbing amplitudes or array-response vectors. If realistic motion or calibration errors also alter path-loss terms or effective array responses, the tensor rank and subsequent decomposition no longer isolate the desired quantities, biasing the estimator. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the joint-estimation claim and requires explicit robustness analysis or additional simulations with amplitude perturbations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this modeling assumption. Our derivation treats position mismatches as inducing multiplicative phase coefficients because, under the far-field narrowband model and small deviations consistent with the FRIS grid and two-time-scale protocol, phase perturbations dominate the received-signal tensor while amplitude variations from path-loss or array-response changes remain second-order and do not alter the tensor rank structure used for decomposition. This is consistent with standard array-signal-processing approximations for modest calibration or motion errors. To strengthen the presentation, the revised manuscript includes new simulation results that inject both phase and amplitude perturbations (including path-loss variations) and demonstrates graceful degradation of the estimator. We have also added a dedicated paragraph discussing the validity range of the phase-only model and its limitations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in tensor-based closed-form estimator derivation

full rationale

The paper derives its closed-form joint estimator for user channels and motion-induced phase coefficients directly from the received-signal model under orthogonal pilots and tensor decomposition, following the stated two-time-scale FRIS protocol. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any load-bearing claim collapse to a self-citation or self-definitional loop; the tensor rank and decomposition steps are presented as consequences of the pilot orthogonality and the phase-only mismatch model. Numerical validation is invoked separately, confirming the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard wireless assumptions plus FRIS-specific modeling of position uncertainty as phase coefficients; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Orthogonal pilot sequences are transmitted and received without interference.
    Invoked to enable the tensor decomposition and closed-form recovery of individual channels.
  • domain assumption Position mismatches affect only the phase of the cascaded channel and can be captured by a separate motion-induced coefficient.
    Central modeling choice that allows joint estimation of channels and motion effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5733 in / 1360 out tokens · 58957 ms · 2026-05-19T21:08:44.487456+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, C. Wang, F. R. Ghadi, J. Zhang, J. Rao, R. Murch, P. Ramírez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, C.-B. Chae, and K.-F. Tong, “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325–2377, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: Emerging hardware architectures, applications, and open challenges,

    E. Basar, G. C. Alexandropoulos, Y . Liu, Q. Wu, S. Jin, C. Yuen, O. A. Dobre, and R. Schober, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: Emerging hardware architectures, applications, and open challenges,” IEEE V ehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 27–47, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    On the performance enhancement potential of fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    A. Salem, K.-K. Wong, G. Alexandropoulos, C.-B. Chae, and R. Murch, “On the performance enhancement potential of fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2026

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    From fixed to fluid: Unlocking the new potential with fluid RIS (FRIS),

    H. Xiao, X. Hu, K.-K. Wong, X. Zhu, H. Hong, F. R. Ghadi, H. Xu, and C.-B. Chae, “From fixed to fluid: Unlocking the new potential with fluid RIS (FRIS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18899, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Performance analysis of wireless commu- nication systems assisted by fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    F. Rostami Ghadi, K.-K. Wong, F. Javier López-Martínez, G. C. Alexan- dropoulos, and C.-B. Chae, “Performance analysis of wireless commu- nication systems assisted by fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3922–3926, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Joint On-Off selection and beamforming with discrete phase shifts,

    H. Xiao, X. Hu, K.-K. Wong, H. Hong, G. C. Alexandropoulos, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Joint On-Off selection and beamforming with discrete phase shifts,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3124–3128, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    A first look at the performance enhancement potential of fluid recon- figurable intelligent surface,

    A. Salem, K.-K. Wong, G. Alexandropoulos, C.-B. Chae, and R. Murch, “A first look at the performance enhancement potential of fluid recon- figurable intelligent surface,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17116, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    FIRES: Fluid integrated reflecting and emitting surfaces,

    F. R. Ghadi, K.-K. Wong, M. Kaveh, F. J. López-Martínez, C.-B. Chae, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “FIRES: Fluid integrated reflecting and emitting surfaces,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3744–3748, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Channel estimation in RIS-assisted MIMO systems operating under imperfections,

    P. R. B. Gomes, G. T. de Araújo, B. Sokal, A. L. F. de Almeida, B. Makki, and G. Fodor, “Channel estimation in RIS-assisted MIMO systems operating under imperfections,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communi- cations: Overview of hardware designs, channel models, and estimation techniques,

    M. Jian, G. C. Alexandropoulos, E. Basar, C. Huang, R. Liu, Y . Liu, and C. Yuen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communi- cations: Overview of hardware designs, channel models, and estimation techniques,”Intelligent and Converged Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    On the impact of control signaling in RIS-empowered wireless communications,

    F. Saggese, V . Croisfelt, R. Kotaba, K. Stylianopoulos, G. C. Alexan- dropoulos, and P. Popovski, “On the impact of control signaling in RIS-empowered wireless communications,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 5, pp. 4383–4399, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Tensor decompositions and applications,

    T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader, “Tensor decompositions and applications,” SIAM Review, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 455–500, 2009

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,

    G. T. de Araújo, A. L. F. de Almeida, and R. Boyer, “Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 789–802, 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Channel tracking for RIS-enabled multi-user SIMO systems in time-varying wireless channels,

    J. Yuan, G. C. Alexandropoulos, E. Kofidis, T. L. Jensen, and E. De Car- valho, “Channel tracking for RIS-enabled multi-user SIMO systems in time-varying wireless channels,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2022, pp. 145–150

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Non-iterative solution for PARAFAC with a Toeplitz matrix factor,

    A. Y . Kibangou and G. Favier, “Non-iterative solution for PARAFAC with a Toeplitz matrix factor,” inProc. EUSIPCO, 8 2009, pp. 691–695

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Dual-symmetric parallel factor analysis using procrustes estimation and Khatri-Rao factorization,

    M. Weis, F. Roemer, M. Haardt, and P. Husar, “Dual-symmetric parallel factor analysis using procrustes estimation and Khatri-Rao factorization,” in2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, 2012, pp. 270–274

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    A multilinear singular value decomposition,

    L. De Lathauwer, B. De Moor, and J. Vandewalle, “A multilinear singular value decomposition,”SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1253–1278, 2000

    work page 2000