Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 105 references

SIMPLIFI -- Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments. I. Magnetically-Guided Accretion onto the DR21 Ridge

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-14 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Projected gravity and magnetic fields remain aligned throughout the DR21 cloud at all densities

desk verdict The paper maps a persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment across DR21 densities that is new, but this does not by itself establish net accretion flow along field lines. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.12604 v1 pith:IENDURP7 submitted 2026-05-12 astro-ph.GA

Thushara G. S. Pillai , Jens Kauffmann , Juan D. Soler , Mark Heyer , Philip C. Myers , Laura M. Fissel , Dan Clemens , Koji Sugitani
show 10 more authors
Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez Fumitaka Nakamura Andrea Giannetti Daniel Seifried Paul F. Goldsmith Helmut Wiesemeyer Evangelia Ntormousi Gabriel Franco Stefan Reissl Karl M. Menten
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellarmagneticfieldsmolecularcloudfilamentsaccretionDR21ridgepolarimetrySOFIAcolumndensitysub-Alfvenicgas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The SIMPLIFI survey uses SOFIA polarimetry at 214 microns to map magnetic field directions from the dense DR21 Main Ridge into lower-density surrounding sub-filaments. The central result is that the plane-of-sky magnetic field stays aligned with the projected gravitational acceleration everywhere in the cloud, independent of column density and local environment. This alignment contrasts with the intensity gradient, whose orientation relative to the field shifts from parallel in the sub-filaments to perpendicular in the ridge above a column density of roughly 2 times 10 to the 22 per square centimeter. The persistent match supports a picture in which magnetic fields channel gas flows along the sub-filaments toward the ridge. The implied accretion rates of several thousandths of a solar mass per year are high enough to assemble the ridge structure in about one million years and to explain why measured radial velocities fall well below free-fall values.

What carries the argument

The persistent alignment between the projected gravitational acceleration vec g_pos and the plane-of-sky magnetic field hat B_pos, independent of column density, used to infer ongoing channeled accretion along field lines.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the three-dimensional velocity field along the inferred field directions that shows no net systematic inflow toward the ridge despite the alignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Our central finding is that vec g_pos and hat B_pos remain aligned throughout the cloud regardless of column density or environment, unlike the environment-dependent behavior of either quantity versus the intensity gradient. This persistent alignment is consistent with magnetically-guided accretion: sub-filaments channel material along field lines at several 10^{-3} solar masses per year, sufficient to assemble the Ridge within about 1 Myr and sustain high-mass star formation. The framework also explains why observed radial velocities of about 2 km/s fall well below free-fall expectations of about 8 km/s due to projection effects.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed alignment between projected gravity and magnetic field directions indicates net mass flow along those lines rather than static configurations or projection effects that could produce the same geometry without accretion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sub-filaments supply gas to the main ridge at rates of several 10^{-3} solar masses per year.
  • The DR21 ridge can be assembled on a timescale of roughly 1 Myr.
  • Observed radial velocities around 2 km/s are lower than free-fall values of 8 km/s because of projection along the line of sight.
  • Magnetic field orientation changes with column density only relative to intensity gradients, not relative to gravity directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same alignment signature may appear in other filamentary clouds formed from strongly magnetized gas.
  • Time-dependent velocity mapping could test whether the inferred flows actually deliver the predicted mass over Myr timescales.
  • The column-density threshold for orientation shifts may vary between clouds according to their initial magnetization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports first results from the SIMPLIFI SOFIA/HAWC+ 214 μm polarimetric survey of the DR21 Ridge and its sub-filaments. It finds that the plane-of-sky magnetic field (B_pos) remains aligned with the projected gravitational acceleration (g_pos) across the entire region independent of column density, while the intensity gradient shows a transition from parallel to perpendicular alignment at N(H2) ~ 2e22 cm^{-2}. This persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment is interpreted as evidence for magnetically-guided accretion along field lines at rates of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1}, sufficient to assemble the ridge in ~1 Myr; projection effects are invoked to reconcile observed velocities (~2 km s^{-1}) with free-fall expectations (~8 km s^{-1}).

Significance. If the alignment result is placed on a statistically robust footing, the work would strengthen the case for magnetic fields guiding accretion in high-mass star-forming filaments, extending polarimetry to lower-column sub-filaments and providing a concrete link between sub-filament morphology and ridge assembly. The consistency with Planck thresholds and the explicit accretion-rate estimate are positive features. The significance is limited, however, by the absence of quantitative error analysis and independent kinematic confirmation of net mass flow.

major comments (3)
  1. [alignment analysis] Alignment analysis section: the central claim of persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment independent of column density and environment is presented without reported uncertainties on the orientation angles, without statistical tests (e.g., Kuiper or Rayleigh tests on the angle distributions), and without pixel-by-pixel or region-by-region significance values. This leaves the “regardless of column density” statement only qualitatively supported.
  2. [accretion-rate section] Accretion-rate derivation: the quoted rate of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1} is obtained by combining the observed alignment with geometric assumptions about filament length and density; no independent mass-flux calculation (e.g., from coherent velocity gradients parallel to B_pos) is supplied, so the numerical value rests entirely on the interpretive step that alignment equals net accretion.
  3. [discussion of velocities and projection] Projection-effects discussion: the text invokes projection to explain why observed radial velocities are ~2 km s^{-1} rather than the ~8 km s^{-1} free-fall speed, yet supplies no quantitative Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer assessment of how line-of-sight geometry affects both the measured alignment and the velocity discrepancy. This weakens the claim that the alignment directly demonstrates ongoing accretion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [figures and notation] Notation for vec g_pos and hat B_pos should be defined once in the text and used consistently in all figure captions and axis labels.
  2. [results on intensity gradient] The transition column density N(H2) ~ 2e22 cm^{-2} is stated without an accompanying uncertainty or sensitivity test to the exact threshold choice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have improved the statistical rigor and clarity of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Alignment analysis section: the central claim of persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment independent of column density and environment is presented without reported uncertainties on the orientation angles, without statistical tests (e.g., Kuiper or Rayleigh tests on the angle distributions), and without pixel-by-pixel or region-by-region significance values. This leaves the “regardless of column density” statement only qualitatively supported.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative uncertainties and statistical tests are needed to support the claim robustly. In the revised manuscript we now report uncertainties on mean alignment angles from the standard deviation within each column-density bin, apply Rayleigh tests to the angle distributions (finding p < 0.01 for non-uniformity consistent with alignment across all bins), and include a pixel-by-pixel alignment significance map. These additions place the “independent of column density” statement on a statistically firmer footing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Accretion-rate derivation: the quoted rate of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1} is obtained by combining the observed alignment with geometric assumptions about filament length and density; no independent mass-flux calculation (e.g., from coherent velocity gradients parallel to B_pos) is supplied, so the numerical value rests entirely on the interpretive step that alignment equals net accretion.

    Authors: The quoted rate is an order-of-magnitude estimate derived from the observed alignment together with standard geometric assumptions for filament length and density profile; no direct velocity-gradient measurement along B_pos is available in the present polarimetric dataset. We have revised the text to state explicitly that the value rests on the magnetically-guided accretion interpretation, to list the key assumptions, and to note that independent kinematic confirmation would require additional line observations. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Projection-effects discussion: the text invokes projection to explain why observed radial velocities are ~2 km s^{-1} rather than the ~8 km s^{-1} free-fall speed, yet supplies no quantitative Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer assessment of how line-of-sight geometry affects both the measured alignment and the velocity discrepancy. This weakens the claim that the alignment directly demonstrates ongoing accretion.

    Authors: A full Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer treatment of 3D geometry lies beyond the scope of this observational paper. We have expanded the discussion with a simple analytic projection argument showing that random inclinations typically reduce the line-of-sight velocity component by a factor of ~3–4, reconciling the observed ~2 km s^{-1} with free-fall expectations. The plane-of-sky alignment measurement itself is a direct orientation comparison and is less sensitive to projection than the velocity amplitude. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent kinematic confirmation of net mass flow along the field lines, which would require new velocity-resolved observations not present in the current dataset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation rests on independent observational measurements

full rationale

The paper measures plane-of-sky magnetic field orientations directly from SOFIA/HAWC+ polarimetry and derives projected gravitational acceleration from the column density map; their alignment is reported as an observed fact across column densities. No equations or steps reduce the alignment result to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does the text invoke self-citations for uniqueness theorems or smuggle ansatzes. The accretion-rate estimate is presented as a derived consequence using the observed alignment and geometric factors, not as an input that is then renamed a prediction. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks such as Planck thresholds and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard polarimetric interpretation of dust alignment plus one interpretive step linking observed B-g alignment to net accretion flow; the accretion rate is derived rather than freely fitted but depends on assumed geometry and velocity projection.

free parameters (1)
  • accretion rate = several 10^{-3} M_sun yr^{-1}
    Estimated from observed radial velocities and assumed filament geometry to reach the assembly time of ~1 Myr
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Dust polarization at 214 um reliably traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation
    Invoked when converting HAWC+ polarization angles to B_pos directions
  • domain assumption Persistent alignment between projected gravity and magnetic field indicates net mass flow along field lines
    Central interpretive link used to conclude magnetically-guided accretion

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SIMPLIFI -- Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments. I. Magnetically-Guided Accretion onto the DR21 Ridge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IENDURP7

@misc{pith2026260512604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SIMPLIFI -- Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments. I. Magnetically-Guided Accretion onto the DR21 Ridge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IENDURP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.12604}
}
abstract

We present first results from SIMPLIFI (Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments), a SOFIA/HAWC+ $214~\mu\rm{}m$ polarimetric survey of Galactic molecular cloud filaments. We trace magnetic field morphology from the DR21 Main Ridge into surrounding sub-filaments at $\sim{}0.1~\rm{}pc$ resolution, extending polarimetric detections for the first time beyond high-column-density regions probed by prior submillimeter observations. We compare the plane-of-sky orientations of the magnetic field $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$, the projected gravitational acceleration $\vec{g}_{\rm{}pos}$, and the intensity gradient rotated by $90^{\circ}$. The relative orientation of $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$ and the rotated gradient transitions from preferentially parallel in sub-filaments to perpendicular in the Main Ridge at $N({\rm{}H_2})\sim{}2\times{}10^{22}~\rm{}cm^{-2}$, consistent with thresholds seen with Planck. This is expected in clouds formed from strongly magnetized, sub-Alfvenic, magnetically sub-critical gas. We find region-to-region and pixel-to-pixel variations at fixed column density, indicating that column density alone is not sufficient to encode changes in magnetic field structure. Our central finding is that $\vec{g}_{\rm{}pos}$ and $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$ remain aligned throughout the cloud regardless of column density or environment, unlike the environment-dependent behavior of either quantity vs. the intensity gradient. This persistent alignment is consistent with magnetically-guided accretion: sub-filaments channel material along field lines at several $10^{-3}\,M_{\odot}\,\rm{}yr^{-1}$, sufficient to assemble the Ridge within $\sim{}1~\rm{}Myr$ and sustain high-mass star formation. The framework also explains why observed radial velocities $\sim{}2~\rm{}km\,s^{-1}$ fall well below free-fall expectations $\sim{}8~\rm{}km\,s^{-1}$ due to projection effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Spitzer three-color image of the DR21 complex (blue: IRAC1, green: IRAC2, red: IRAC4), rendered on the same pixel grid as the column density map in the right panel. Right: Plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation inferred from HAWC+ 214 µm polarization (rotated by 90◦ ), overlaid on the Herschel-derived H2 column density map of Pokhrel et al. (2020) (color scale). Contours mark H2 column densities of 1, 2, 3, a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of magnetic field orientation inferred from polarized dust emission observed with SOFIA/HAWC+ at 214 µm (left) and JCMT/POL-2 at 850 µm (right) for p/σp ≥ 3.0 (Ching et al. 2022). The background colorscale images show the respective Stokes I intensities. Black contours in both panels indicate Herschel H2 column densities, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. SOFIA/HAWC+ 214 µm Stokes I image of DR21 in grayscale and contours with overlaid analysis masks (col￾ored boundaries) used to separate the Main Ridge from the system of sub-filaments. Thin colored lines indicate the spines of the Main Ridge and sub-filaments, as derived from the Herschel-based column density map. The red ellipse marks the outflow region near DR21 Main, excluded from this study. A magenta cross mark… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The left panel depicts the direction of the gravitational acceleration field ⃗gpos in the form of white vectors. The magnitude of ⃗gpos is indicated by dotted contours drawn at accelerations of [0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50]·10−10 m s−2 . The right panel depicts the direction of …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Projected Rayleigh statistic Z (top row; Eq. [7]) and per-pixel alignment components zi (bottom row; Eq. [13]) as a function of column density. Blue shading/empty circles: sub-filaments; green shading/gray crosses: DR21 Main Ridge. Columns show the relative orientation…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Outline of a magnetic field and cloud geometry consistent with the HAWC+ observations. Blue and magenta vertical arrows indicate the global structure of the magnetic field. The blue cylinder represents a dense cloud, such as the DR21 Main Ridge. The green layers repres…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative orientation between Bˆpos and ∇ˆ ⊥I as measured for the entire cloud (Main Ridge plus all sub-filaments). Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Aghanim, N., Alves, M

    Ade, P. A., Aghanim, N., Alves, M. I., et al. 2016, , 586, A138, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525896

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525896 2016

  2. [2]

    Andersson , B.-G., Lazarian , A., & Vaillancourt , J. E. 2015, , 53, 501, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  3. [3]

    Protostars and Planets VI , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Andr \'e , P., Di Francesco , J., Ward-Thompson , D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 27--51, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002 2014

  4. [4]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Andr \'e , P., Men'shchikov , A., Bontemps , S., et al. 2010, , 518, L102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014666 2010

  5. [5]

    2019, A&A, 621, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    Arzoumanian , D., Andr \'e , P., K \"o nyves , V., et al. 2019, , 621, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 2019

  6. [6]

    T., Kauffmann, J., Bigiel, F., et al

    Barnes, A. T., Kauffmann, J., Bigiel, F., et al. 2020, , 497, 1972, 10.1093/mnras/staa1814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1814 2020

  7. [8]

    M., Koenig, X

    Beerer, I. M., Koenig, X. P., Hora, J. L., et al. 2010, , 720, 679, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/679

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/1/679 2010

  8. [9]

    A&A , keywords =

    Bonne, L., Bontemps, S., Schneider, N., et al. 2020, , 644, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038281

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038281 2020

Show all 105 references
  1. [10]

    2023, , 951, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd536

    ---. 2023, , 951, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd536

    2023 doi

  2. [11]

    O., Chuss, D

    Butterfield, N. O., Chuss, D. T., Guerra, J. A., et al. 2024, , 963, 130, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b9

    2024 doi

  3. [12]

    L., Goldsmith , P

    Chapman , N. L., Goldsmith , P. F., Pineda , J. L., et al. 2011, , 741, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/21

    2011 doi

  4. [13]

    2017, , 838, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65cc

    Ching , T.-C., Lai , S.-P., Zhang , Q., et al. 2017, , 838, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65cc

    2017 doi

  5. [14]

    2018, , 865, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fc

    ---. 2018, , 865, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fc

    2018 doi

  6. [15]

    2022, , 941, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9dfb

    Ching, T.-C., Qiu, K., Li, D., et al. 2022, , 941, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9dfb

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    T., Andersson, B.-G., Bally, J., et al

    Chuss, D. T., Andersson, B.-G., Bally, J., et al. 2019, , 872, 187, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37

    2019 doi

  8. [17]

    W., Myers, P

    Coudé, S., Stephens, I. W., Myers, P. C., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 2, 10.3847/1538-4365/AE0E61

    2026 doi

  9. [18]

    Crutcher, R. M. 2012, , 50, 29, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514

    2012 doi

  10. [19]

    M., Troland , T

    Crutcher , R. M., Troland , T. H., Lazareff , B., Paubert , G., & Kaz \`e s , I. 1999, , 514, L121, 10.1086/311952

    1999 doi

  11. [20]

    J., Kumar , M

    Davis , C. J., Kumar , M. S. N., Sandell , G., et al. 2007, , 374, 29, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11163.x

    2007 doi

  12. [21]

    J., & Smith , M

    Davis , C. J., & Smith , M. D. 1996, , 310, 961

    1996

  13. [22]

    2019, PASJ, 71, S12, 10.1093/pasj/psz041

    Dobashi, K., Shimoikura, T., Katakura, S., Nakamura, F., & Shimajiri, Y. 2019, PASJ, 71, S12, 10.1093/pasj/psz041

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    Z., & Mitrofanov , I

    Dolginov , A. Z., & Mitrofanov , I. G. 1976, , 43, 291, 10.1007/BF00640010

    1976 doi

  15. [24]

    L., Vaillancourt , J

    Dotson , J. L., Vaillancourt , J. E., Kirby , L., et al. 2010, , 186, 406, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/406

    2010 doi

  16. [25]

    D., Cook , B

    Dowell , C. D., Cook , B. T., Harper , D. A., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 77356H, 10.1117/12.857842

    2010 doi

  17. [26]

    2013, , 558, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321393

    Duarte-Cabral , A., Bontemps , S., Motte , F., et al. 2013, , 558, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321393

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    H., Crutcher , R

    Falgarone , E., Troland , T. H., Crutcher , R. M., & Paubert , G. 2008, , 487, 247, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809577

    2008 doi

  19. [28]

    M., Ade , P

    Fissel , L. M., Ade , P. A. R., Angil \`e , F. E., et al. 2019, , 878, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0

    2019 doi

  20. [29]

    P., Geballe , T

    Garden , R. P., Geballe , T. R., Gatley , I., & Nadeau , D. 1991 a , , 366, 474, 10.1086/169582

    1991 doi

  21. [30]

    P., Hayashi , M., Gatley , I., Hasegawa , T., & Kaifu , N

    Garden , R. P., Hayashi , M., Gatley , I., Hasegawa , T., & Kaifu , N. 1991 b , , 374, 540, 10.1086/170143

    1991 doi

  22. [31]

    M., Frau , P., Zhang , Q., et al

    Girart , J. M., Frau , P., Zhang , Q., et al. 2013, , 772, 69, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/69

    2013 doi

  23. [32]

    K., & Young , E

    Glenn , J., Walker , C. K., & Young , E. T. 1999, , 511, 812, 10.1086/306707

    1999 doi

  24. [33]

    F., Heyer , M., Narayanan , G., et al

    Goldsmith , P. F., Heyer , M., Narayanan , G., et al. 2008, , 680, 428, 10.1086/587166

    2008 doi

  25. [34]

    F., & Lazarian , A

    Gonz \'a lez-Casanova , D. F., & Lazarian , A. 2017, , 835, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/41

    2017 doi

  26. [35]

    E., Heitsch, F., et al

    Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., Heitsch, F., et al. 2023, ASPC, 534, 153, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.09562

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    A., Runyan , M

    Harper , D. A., Runyan , M. C., Dowell , C. D., et al. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840008, 10.1142/S2251171718400081

    2018 doi

  28. [37]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature 2020 585:7825, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    Harvey-Smith , L., Soria-Ruiz , R., Duarte-Cabral , A., & Cohen , R. J. 2008, , 384, 719, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12737.x

    2008 doi

  30. [39]

    2013, , 769, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/115

    Heitsch, F. 2013, , 769, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/115

    2013 doi

  31. [40]

    2013, , 556, A153, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    Hennebelle , P. 2013, , 556, A153, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    2012, , 543, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219429

    Hennemann, M., Motte, F., Schneider, N., et al. 2012, , 543, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219429

    2012 doi

  33. [43]

    2021, , 908, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    Hu, B., Qiu, K., Cao, Y., et al. 2021, , 908, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    2021 doi

  34. [44]

    H., Lazarian , V., et al

    Hu , Y., Yuen , K. H., Lazarian , V., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 776, 10.1038/s41550-019-0769-0

    2019 doi

  35. [45]

    C., Mac Low , M.-M., & Klessen , R

    Ib \'a \ n ez-Mej \' a , J. C., Mac Low , M.-M., & Klessen , R. S. 2022, , 925, 196, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b58

    2022 doi

  36. [46]

    2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    Inoue , T., Hennebelle , P., Fukui , Y., et al. 2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    2018 doi

  37. [47]

    H., & Tamura , M

    Itoh , Y., Chrysostomou , A., Burton , M., Hough , J. H., & Tamura , M. 1999, , 304, 406, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02318.x

    1999 doi

  38. [48]

    L., Hill , R., Scott , D., et al

    Jow , D. L., Hill , R., Scott , D., et al. 2018, , 474, 1018, 10.1093/mnras/stx2736

    2018 doi

  39. [49]

    D., Clemens , D

    Kane , B. D., Clemens , D. P., Barvainis , R., & Leach , R. W. 1993, , 411, 708, 10.1086/172873

    1993 doi

  40. [50]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, N. J., & Lee, C. W. 2008, , 487, 993, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809481

    2008 doi

  41. [51]

    C., & Goodman, A

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T., Shetty, R., Myers, P. C., & Goodman, A. A. 2010, , 712, 1137, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1137

    2010 doi

  42. [52]

    2009, , 694, 1056, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1056

    Kirby , L. 2009, , 694, 1056, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1056

    2009 doi

  43. [53]

    M., Tang , Y.-W., & Ho , P

    Koch , P. M., Tang , Y.-W., & Ho , P. T. P. 2012, , 747, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/79

    2012 doi

  44. [54]

    M., et al

    Koley , A., Roy , N., Menten , K. M., et al. 2021, , 501, 4825, 10.1093/mnras/staa3898

    2021 doi

  45. [55]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Davis , C. J., Grave , J. M. C., Ferreira , B., & Froebrich , D. 2007, , 374, 54, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11145.x

    2007 doi

  46. [56]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Palmeirim , P., Arzoumanian , D., & Inutsuka , S. I. 2020, , 642, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    2020 doi

  47. [57]

    J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J

    Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. F. 2010, , 724, 687, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/687

    2010 doi

  48. [58]

    M., & Crutcher , R

    Lai , S.-P., Girart , J. M., & Crutcher , R. M. 2003, , 598, 392, 10.1086/378769

    2003 doi

  49. [59]

    2007, , 378, 910, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    Lazarian , A., & Hoang , T. 2007, , 378, 910, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    2007 doi

  50. [60]

    K., et al

    Li , H.-B., Goodman , A., Sridharan , T. K., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 101--123, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch005

    2014 doi

  51. [61]

    S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Ajeddig, H., et al

    Li, P. S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Ajeddig, H., et al. 2022, , 510, 6085, 10.1093/mnras/stab3448

    2022 doi

  52. [62]

    2022, , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Clarke, M., Shenoy, S., et al. 2022, , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    2022 doi

  53. [63]

    J., & Whitworth , D

    McGuiness , R., Smith , R. J., & Whitworth , D. 2026, , 546, stag099, 10.1093/mnras/stag099

    2026 doi

  54. [64]

    F., & Ostriker , E

    McKee , C. F., & Ostriker , E. C. 2007, , 45, 565, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    2007 doi arXiv

  55. [65]

    F., Zweibel, E

    McKee, C. F., Zweibel, E. G., Goodman, A. A., & Heiles, C. 1993, Protostars and Planets III Editors. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993prpl.conf..327M

    1993

  56. [66]

    1985, Physica Scripta, 1985, 53, 10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T11/007

    Mestel, L. 1985, Physica Scripta, 1985, 53, 10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T11/007

    1985 doi

  57. [67]

    1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, 10.1093/MNRAS/116.5.503

    Mestel, L., & Spitzer, L. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, 10.1093/MNRAS/116.5.503

    1956 doi

  58. [68]

    R., & Murray , A

    Minchin , N. R., & Murray , A. G. 1994, , 286, 579

    1994

  59. [69]

    2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    Molinari , S., Swinyard , B., Bally , J., et al. 2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    2010 doi

  60. [70]

    Momjian , E., & Sarma , A. P. 2017, , 834, 168, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/168

    2017 doi

  61. [71]

    2007, , 476, 1243, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077843

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., Schilke , P., et al. 2007, , 476, 1243, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077843

    2007 doi

  62. [72]

    Mouschovias, T. C. 1976 a , ApJ, 206, 753, 10.1086/154436

    1976 doi

  63. [73]

    1976 b , ApJ, 207, 141, 10.1086/154478

    ---. 1976 b , ApJ, 207, 141, 10.1086/154478

    1976 doi

  64. [74]

    Myers , P. C. 2009, , 700, 1609, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609

    2009 doi

  65. [75]

    C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S

    Myers , P. C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S. 2018, , 868, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae695

    2018 doi

  66. [76]

    C., Stephens , I

    Myers , P. C., Stephens , I. W., Auddy , S., et al. 2020, , 896, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9110

    2020 doi

  67. [77]

    2008, , 687, 354, 10.1086/591641

    Nakamura, F., & Li, Z.-Y. 2008, , 687, 354, 10.1086/591641

    2008 doi

  68. [78]

    1978, , 30, 671, 10.1093/PASJ/30.4.671

    Nakano, T., & Nakamura, T. 1978, , 30, 671, 10.1093/PASJ/30.4.671

    1978 doi

  69. [79]

    C., Stone, J

    Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., & Gammie, C. F. 2001, , 546, 980, 10.1086/318290

    2001 doi

  70. [80]

    1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    Ostriker, J. 1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    1964 doi

  71. [81]

    Padovani , M., Galli , D., & Glassgold , A. E. 2009, , 501, 619, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911794

    2009 doi

  72. [82]

    2023, ASPC, 534, 193, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.11179

    Pattle, K., Fissel, L., Tahani, M., et al. 2023, ASPC, 534, 193, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.11179

    2023 doi

  73. [83]

    Pillai , T. G. S., Clemens , D. P., Reissl , S., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1195, 10.1038/s41550-020-1172-6

    2020 doi

  74. [84]

    2008, , 484, 1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078818

    Pinto , C., Galli , D., & Bacciotti , F. 2008, , 484, 1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078818

    2008 doi

  75. [85]

    2020, , 641, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833885

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Akrami , Y., et al. 2020, , 641, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833885

    2020 doi

  76. [86]

    A., Betti , S

    Pokhrel , R., Gutermuth , R. A., Betti , S. K., et al. 2020, , 896, 60, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab92a2

    2020 doi

  77. [87]

    2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I, ed

    Reipurth , B., & Schneider , N. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I, ed. B. Reipurth , Vol. 4, 36

    2008

  78. [88]

    A., Dickel , H

    Roberts , D. A., Dickel , H. R., & Goss , W. M. 1997, , 476, 209, 10.1086/303602

    1997 doi

  79. [89]

    Rygl , K. L. J., Brunthaler , A., Sanna , A., et al. 2012, , 539, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118211

    2012 doi

  80. [90]

    2006, , 458, 855, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065088

    Schneider , N., Bontemps , S., Simon , R., et al. 2006, , 458, 855, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065088

    2006 doi

  81. [91]

    2010, , 520, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014481

    Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, , 520, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014481

    2010 doi

  82. [92]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 546, 10.1038/s41550-023-01901-5

    Schneider , N., Bonne , L., Bontemps , S., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 546, 10.1038/s41550-023-01901-5

    2023 doi

  83. [93]

    Schneider , S., & Elmegreen , B. G. 1979, , 41, 87, 10.1086/190609

    1979 doi

  84. [94]

    2020, , 497, 4196, 10.1093/mnras/staa2231

    Seifried, D., Walch, S., Weis, M., et al. 2020, , 497, 4196, 10.1093/mnras/staa2231

    2020 doi

  85. [95]

    Shirley , Y. L. 2015, , 127, 299, 10.1086/680342

    2015 doi

  86. [96]

    Simmons , J. F. L., & Stewart , B. G. 1985, , 142, 100

    1985

  87. [97]

    2025, SOFIA Science Data Archive, IPAC, 10.26131/IRSA636

    SOFIA Team . 2025, SOFIA Science Data Archive, IPAC, 10.26131/IRSA636

    2025 doi

  88. [99]

    Soler, J. D. 2019, , 629, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935779

    2019 doi

  89. [100]

    D., & Hennebelle , P

    Soler , J. D., & Hennebelle , P. 2017, , 607, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731049

    2017 doi

  90. [101]

    D., Hennebelle, P., Martin, P

    Soler, J. D., Hennebelle, P., Martin, P. G., et al. 2013, , 774, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/128

    2013 doi

  91. [102]

    W., Coud \'e , S., Myers , P

    Stephens , I. W., Coud \'e , S., Myers , P. C., et al. 2025, , 995, 181, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae08a8

    2025 doi

  92. [103]

    2024, , 687, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449824

    Tapinassi, D., Galli, D., Padovani, M., & Beuther, H. 2024, , 687, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449824

    2024 doi

  93. [104]

    2014, , 785, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/24

    Tomisaka, K. 2014, , 785, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/24

    2014 doi

  94. [105]

    2006, , 118, 1340, 10.1086/507472

    Vaillancourt, J. 2006, , 118, 1340, 10.1086/507472

    2006 doi

  95. [106]

    P., & Fiege , J

    Vall \'e e , J. P., & Fiege , J. D. 2006, , 636, 332, 10.1086/497957

    2006 doi

  96. [107]

    Wardle, J. F. C., Kronberg, P. P., Wardle, J. F. C., & Kronberg, P. P. 1974, ApJ, 194, 249, 10.1086/153240

    1974 doi

  97. [108]

    A., Loinard , L., Su , Y.-N., et al

    Zapata , L. A., Loinard , L., Su , Y.-N., et al. 2012, , 744, 86, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/86

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.