Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Double Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation: normalization and normal form non-integrability

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation's fourth-order truncated normal form, after reduction by its two quadratic integrals, is non-integrable for almost all coefficient values.

desk verdict Useful normal-form and generic non-integrability result for the double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation, but Theorem 1's nilpotent normalization is asserted rather than proved and the abstract oversells the scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23991 v1 pith:IGBAABTQ submitted 2025-05-29 math.DS

L.M. Lerman , R. Mazrooei-Sebdani , N.E. Kulagin This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 34C3737C2937J2037J3537J4070H07
keywords doubleHamiltonianHopfbifurcationnormalformnon-integrabilitysystemshomoclinicorbitssaddle-centerLaméequationSwift-Hohenberg
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation: a generic two-parameter unfolding of a Hamiltonian system whose critical equilibrium has two pairs of double non-semi-simple imaginary eigenvalues $\pm i\omega_1$, $\pm i\omega_2$. It derives the normal form of the unfolding, shows that the fourth-order truncation is universal under absence of strong resonances, and reduces the system by its two quadratic integrals to a two-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian. The central result is that this reduced fourth-order truncated system is non-integrable for almost all values of its quartic coefficients: Corollary 1 states that for all ratios $B/A$ except integers $l(l-1)/2$ with $l\in\mathbb{N}$, no additional meromorphic first integral exists. The paper also exhibits integrable exceptional cases and analyzes the reduced dynamics, including a numerical study of homoclinic orbits in a Swift-Hohenberg-derived example.

What carries the argument

The central object is the truncated normal form Hamiltonian $H=\omega_1S_1+\omega_2S_2+N_1+N_2+\nu M_1+\mu M_2+AM_1^2+BM_1M_2+CM_2^2$, written in the ring of $T^2$-invariants $S_1,S_2,N_1,N_2,M_1,M_2,P_1,P_2$ subject to the syzygies $4N_iM_i=P_i^2+S_i^2$. The integrals $S_1,S_2$ generate a symplectic $T^2$-action; reduction leads to a four-dimensional phase space, and at $S_1=S_2=0$ the reduced Hamiltonian is $H_0=\frac12(Q_1^2+Q_2^2)+\frac{\varepsilon_1}{2}r_1^2+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{2}r_2^2+\frac14[Ar_1^4+2Br_1^2r_2^2+Cr_2^4]$, two coupled anharmonic oscillators. Non-integrability is carried by the homoclinic orbits of the saddle-center (or saddle) equilibria of these oscillators: for the saddle-center, the reflection coefficient of the linearized normal variational equation on the homoclinic orbit vanishes exactly when $B/A=l(l-1)/2$, giving a countable exceptional set; for the saddle case, the Lam\'e-type normal variational equation provides the non-integrability criterion. The same normal form holds under the weaker assumption that $\omega_1/\omega_2\notin\{1/4,1/3,1/2\}$.

What would settle it

Perform the fourth-order normal form computation explicitly for a concrete Hamiltonian, such as the Swift-Hohenberg Galerkin system (24) at $\alpha=0$, and check whether any $N_i$ or $P_i$ monomial appears in the normalized fourth-order part; if one does, Theorem 1 and Corollary 1 fail. Alternatively, for a ratio $B/A\in\{1,3,6,10\}$, numerically search for an additional independent analytic first integral via Poincar\'e sections or by computing the reflection coefficient: a positive find for a non-listed ratio, or a negative one for a listed exceptional value, would force a reexamination.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the fourth-order truncated normal form of the double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation, reduced by the two commuting quadratic integrals $S_1$ and $S_2$, is generically non-integrable. After reduction to two degrees of freedom at the zero level of the integrals, the Hamiltonian becomes a pair of coupled quartic oscillators, and the paper proves that for all coefficient ratios $B/A$ that are not integers $l(l-1)/2$, the system admits no additional meromorphic first integral. The proof combines non-integrability criteria for homoclinic orbits of saddle-centers, specifically the reflection-coefficient theorem of Grotta Ragazzo, with results on transverse homoclinic orbits; in the saddle case it uses differential Galois analysis of a Lam\'e-type normal variational equation. Integrable cases occur at special ratios, such as $A=B=C$ (a Garnier-type system) and $A=C$, $B=3A$, with explicit second integrals. This stands in marked contrast to the ordinary Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation, where truncated normal forms at every order are integrable.

Load-bearing premise

The non-integrability theorem rests on Theorem 1's claim that after normalization with respect to the nilpotent part, the fourth-order terms contain only $M_1^2$, $M_1M_2$, and $M_2^2$ with no surviving $N_i$ or $P_i$ terms; the computation is asserted in one line rather than shown, and if such terms survive, the reduced Hamiltonian and the non-integrability proof would describe a different system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reduced fourth-order truncated system of the double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation is generically chaotic: no extra meromorphic first integral exists, and near saddle-centers there are transverse homoclinic orbits to Lyapunov periodic orbits.
  • Non-integrability is decided by linearized data on a single homoclinic orbit: the reflection coefficient of the normal variational equation vanishes only on the countable exceptional set $B/A=l(l-1)/2$.
  • The universality of the fourth-order normal form transfers the non-integrability result from irrational frequency ratios to all ratios with no strong resonances, namely $\omega_1/\omega_2\notin\{1/4,1/3,1/2\}$.
  • Integrable reduced systems do exist at special coefficient ratios with explicit second integrals, such as the Garnier case $A=B=C$ and the case $A=C$, $B=3A$, providing sharp exceptions to the generic non-integrability.
  • In the saddle case with $\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2<0$ and $A,C>0$, the figure-eight homoclinic structure and the Lam\'e-equation criterion imply non-integrability, and the paper expects super-homoclinic orbits and infinite multi-pulse homoclinic loops in the unfolding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Theorem 1's normal-form structure is correct, the non-integrability should persist under small detuning parameters because transverse homoclinic intersections are open conditions; this is a natural next step the paper does not explicitly prove.
  • The exceptional set $B/A=l(l-1)/2$ is probably not the full list of integrable cases: the paper quotes Lakshmanan-Sahadevan examples with fifth- and eighth-order polynomial integrals, so a complete classification of integrable reduced systems remains open.
  • The reflection-coefficient test could be applied directly to the Swift-Hohenberg Galerkin system (24) itself, bypassing the truncated normal form, to decide non-integrability of that specific finite-dimensional Hamiltonian reduction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation: a generic two-parameter unfolding of a Hamiltonian system with four degrees of freedom whose linearization at the critical equilibrium has two non-semisimple double imaginary pairs. The authors derive a normal form using invariant theory and the Poisson structure of the invariants, then truncate at fourth order. The truncated normal form has two commuting quadratic integrals (S1, S2), and the authors reduce to a two-degree-of-freedom system. Their central result is Corollary 1: for the reduced system at S1=S2=0, for all ratios B/A except integers l(l-1)/2, the system is non-integrable, using the Grotta Ragazzo criterion in the saddle-center case. The paper also discusses integrable cases, bifurcations of equilibria, and a numerical study of homoclinic orbits in a Swift-Hohenberg Galerkin system.

Significance. If the normal-form theorem and the non-integrability proof are correct, the paper provides a meaningful extension of the Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation to the double-resonance setting. In particular, the generic non-integrability of the reduced fourth-order truncated system contrasts with the standard single Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation, where truncated normal forms of any order are integrable. The paper also gives explicit integrable examples and identifies a sharp-looking exceptional set of coefficients, which is a falsifiable prediction. The invariant formulation and explicit equations (8)-(10) are useful for further work. However, the significance is conditional on the unproved nilpotent-part normalization step and on the restricted domain of the rigorous non-integrability statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 1, Eqs. (6)-(7)] The normal form with respect to the nilpotent part N1+N2 is asserted with the phrase 'Acting as in [45] and taking into account the nilpotent part' and no computation or cohomological statement is given. This is load-bearing: the reduced Hamiltonian H0 in Eq. (20) and hence Corollary 1 require that the fourth-order part contains no N_i or P_i terms. Moreover, the sentence before Theorem 1 says the normalized Hamiltonian should satisfy {H, N_i} ≡ 0, but the normal form (6) includes M_i terms, and Table 1 gives {N_i, M_i} = P_i ≠ 0. Please provide a proof or a precise statement of the normal-form condition (e.g., a complement to the image of ad_{N1+N2} spanned by S_i and M_i), and reconcile the text with the theorem.
  2. [Sections 3, 6 and Corollary 1] The symbol B is used with two different scalings. In Eq. (7) the fourth-order cross term is B M1 M2, which in the coordinates of Eq. (14) equals (B/4) r1^2 r2^2. In Eq. (20) the cross term is (2B/4) r1^2 r2^2, and in Eq. (21) the coefficient in the equations is B. Corollary 1 applies Theorem 2 with beta = B, i.e., the second convention. The relation between B = A_{0011} in the normal form and the beta appearing in the reduced potential must be stated explicitly; otherwise the exceptional set B/A = l(l-1)/2 is ambiguous and the ratio in terms of the normal-form coefficient may differ by a factor of two.
  3. [Abstract, Sections 6.2-6.3, Conclusion] The rigorous non-integrability proof covers only the saddle-center case (epsilon1 and epsilon2 of opposite signs, level S1=S2=0). In the saddle case, Section 6.2 quotes Theorem 4 about Lamé-type normal variational equations but does not state or verify cases (i)-(iii) that would exclude integrability; the elliptic case in Section 6.3 is only a heuristic discussion. The abstract's claim 'proven to be non-integrable for almost all values of its coefficients' and the Conclusion's 'almost all systems in the unfolding are nonintegrable' accordingly overstate what is proved. Please restrict these claims to the saddle-center case or supply the missing verification for the other cases.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, after Eq. (6)] The syzygy line '4NkMk = P^2_k + S^2_k, N_k ≥ 0, M_k ≥ 0, k = 1, 2}.' contains an unbalanced closing brace.
  2. [Section 6.1, Corollary 1] The notion of non-integrability should be specified as 'no additional meromorphic (or analytic) first integral', as in Theorems 2 and 4, and the hypotheses epsilon1 < 0 < epsilon2 with A > 0 should be stated explicitly when Corollary 1 is introduced.
  3. [Section 7 and figures] The text beginning 'The determinant should have a simple zero at some value of the parameter ω' and the subsequent figure captions contain corrupted strings such as '/s48/s44/s51/s48 ...', making that part of the paper unreadable. These passages must be restored to proper mathematical notation.
  4. [Section 2, equilibrium types] In the bullet for the elliptic-saddle-focus case, the eigenvalue expressions such as '±√(-ε2)+iω2' omit the required ± on the imaginary part; the two subcases should be written symmetrically.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nonintegrability result is derived from external theorems applied to an explicit truncated Hamiltonian, with the main weakness being an unproved normal-form assertion rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, generic nonintegrability of the reduced truncated fourth-order normal form, is not obtained by fitting parameters or by defining the target into the input. The truncated Hamiltonian in Eq. (7) is a stated normal-form ansatz, and the reduced Hamiltonian H0 in Eq. (20) follows from an explicit coordinate substitution (Eqs. (14)-(18)) at k1=k2=0. The nonintegrability conclusion is then derived by applying external theorems (Grotta Ragazzo's scattering-coefficient criterion, the Morales-Ruiz-Simo Lame NVE criterion, and Ziglin's method) to the two-degree-of-freedom system (21), with the coefficient identifications alpha = A and beta = B stated in the text. No parameter in those theorems is fitted to data produced by the paper, and the exceptional ratios B/A = l(l-1)/2 are supplied by the external theorem, not by the paper's own construction. The self-citations ([36], [32,33], [40], etc.) are contextual or methodological and do not carry the main derivation. The only substantive weakness is that Theorem 1's nilpotent normal form is asserted with the sentence 'Acting as in [45] and taking into account the nilpotent part, we come to the following theorem' and without a full Lie-transform or cohomology computation; if a fourth-order N_i or P_i term survived, the reduced H0 and hence Corollary 1 would change. That is an omitted proof or derivation gap, not circular reasoning, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; A, B, C, nu, mu, epsilon1, and epsilon2 are normal-form coefficients and detuning parameters, not fitted constants. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced; the T^2 action and the reduced phase space are standard constructions. The axioms listed are the load-bearing assumptions the central claim rests on.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The equilibrium persists at the origin for all parameter values of the unfolding.
    Used in Section 1 after Eq. (1); stated as a normalization without loss of generality.
  • domain assumption Strong resonances are absent: the frequency ratio omega1/omega2 is irrational, or avoids {1/4, 1/3, 1/2} for the fourth-order truncation.
    Abstract and Remark 1; the normal form and the reduction depend on this restriction.
  • ad hoc to paper The fourth-order truncation preserves the essential orbit structure of the normal form.
    Stated in Section 8 as a working assumption, not proved as a shadowing or structural stability statement.
  • ad hoc to paper Normalization with respect to the nilpotent part eliminates N_i and P_i terms from the fourth-order sum in Theorem 1.
    Theorem 1 is asserted with the derivation delegated to the method of [45]; no complete computation is shown.
  • standard math The non-integrability criteria of Grotta Ragazzo (Theorem 2) and Morales-Ruiz-Simo (Theorem 4) apply to the truncated potentials considered.
    Used in Section 6; these are external theorems treated as background.
  • domain assumption AC - B^2 > 0 and B != 0, so the quartic form is definite and the two subsystems are coupled.
    Section 6, paragraph before Eq. (21); the non-integrability analysis is conducted under this condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation: normalization and normal form non-integrability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IGBAABTQ

@misc{pith2026250523991,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation: normalization and normal form non-integrability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IGBAABTQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23991}
}
abstract

The double Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation is studied, i.e. a generic two-parametric unfolding of a smooth Hamiltonian system with four degrees of freedom which has at the critical value of parameters the equilibrium with two pairs of double non semi-simple pure imaginary eigenvalues $\pm i\omega_1,$ $\pm i\omega_2,$ $\omega_1\ne \omega_2$ under an assumption of absence of strong resonances between $\omega_1,\omega_2$. We derive the normal form of the unfolding, when the ratio $\omega_1/\omega_2$ is irrational and study the truncated normal form of the fourth order. This truncated normal form is the same under the absence of strong resonances. The normal form has two quadratic integrals generating a symplectic periodic action of the abelian group $T^2.$ After reduction by means of these integrals we come to the reduced system with two degrees of freedom that is proven to be non-integrable for almost all values of its coefficients. Integrable such systems are also possible at some special values of coefficients, related examples are presented. Some investigations of this truncated system are presented along with its bifurcations when varying small detuning parameters. As an example of a system where this bifurcation is met, the system derived in \cite{KuLe} is investigated. Its homoclinic solutions are examined numerically when the system parameters correspond to a main equilibrium of the twofold saddle-focus type.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23991 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The of orbits on the cone in different cases: Indeed i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The orbits on the hyperboloid in different cases: In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bifurcations in the case A > 0, C > 0, and B > 0. ν l1 l2 E1(cc) E1(sc) E3(sc) E1(sc) E4(hh) E3(sc) E1(sc) E1(ss) E2(sc) E3(sc) E4(hh) E1(sc) E1(sc) E1(sc) E2(sc) µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bifurcations in the case A > 0, C > 0, and B < 0. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bifurcations in the case A < 0, C < 0, and B > 0. If A B2+4ABC+4A C2−2B3 < 0 then E4 is of type saddle-saddle or center-center, and if A B2 + 4ABC + 4A C2 − 2B3 > 0 then E4 is of type hyperbolic-hyperbolic-fold. ν l1 l2 E3(ss) E2(cc) E3(sc) E1(cc) E2(cc) E1(cc) E1(cc) …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bifurcations in the case A < 0, C < 0, and B < 0. If A B2+4ABC+4A C2−2B3 < 0 then E4 is of type saddle-saddle or center-center, and if A B2 + 4ABC + 4A C2 − 2B3 > 0 then E4 is of type hyperbolic-hyperbolic-fold. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projection on the plane r1, r2. orbit lies on an invariant submanifold), where it was proved that if some genericity condi￾tion of the linearized system at the homoclinic solution holds, then any Lyapunov’s small periodic orbit γc on the local center manifold possesses…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Orbit behavior of the Poincar´e map on a cross-sect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) The bifurcation curve of arising out-of-plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) (p1, q1)-projection, α = −0.1, ω = 0.60655; (b) unfoldings q1(t), q3(t); (c) (p3, q3)-projection. -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 -0,05 0,00 0,05 p1 q1 (a) -50 0 50 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 q1,q3 t q1 q3 (b) -0,1 0,0 0,1 0,2 -0,05 0,00 0,05 p3 q3 (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) (p1, q1)-projection, α = −0.1, ω = 0.29041; (b) unfoldings q1(t), q3(t); (c) (p3, q3)-projection. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    van der Meer

    J.C. van der Meer. The Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation, Le ct. Notes in Math., v.1160, Springer-Verlag, (1985). 36

    work page 1985

  2. [36]

    Kulagin, L.M

    N.E. Kulagin, L.M. Lerman, On periodically modulated r olls in the generalized Swift–Hohenberg equation: Galerkin’ approximations, Phy sica D 454 (2023), 133845

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Arnold, Small denominators and problems of stabili ty of motion in classical and celestial mechanics

    V.I. Arnold, Small denominators and problems of stabili ty of motion in classical and celestial mechanics. Usp. Mat. Nauk 18, No.6, 91–192 (1963) . Engl. transl.: Russ. Math. Surv. 18, No.6, 85–191 (1963)

    work page 1963

  4. [2]

    Bakrani, J.S.W

    S. Bakrani, J.S.W. Lamb, D. Turaev, Invariant manifolds of homoclinic orbits and the dynamical consequences of a super-homoclinic: A case study in R4 with Z2-symmetry and integral of motion, J. Diff. Equat., v.327 (2022), 1–63. 33

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    Batemann, A

    H. Batemann, A. Erdelyi, Higher Transcendental Functio ns. vol. III. Based in part on notes left by Harry Bateman. Bateman Project Staff, A. Erdely i, Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York-London, 1955

    work page 1955

  6. [4]

    Belyakov, L.Yu

    L.A. Belyakov, L.Yu. Glebsky, L.M. Lerman, Abundance of Stable Stationary Localized Solutions to the Generalized 1D Swift–Hohenberg Equation, Comput. Math. Appl. v.34 (1997), 253–266

    work page 1997

  7. [5]

    Bernard, V

    P. Bernard, V. Kaloshin, Ke Zhang, Arnold diffusion in arb itrary degrees of free- dom and normally hyperbolic invariant cylinders, Acta Math ., 217, 1–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11511-016-0141-5

    doi:10.1007/s11511-016-0141-5 2016

  8. [6]

    Broer, H

    H. Broer, H. Han ßmann, F. Wagener, Normal resonances in a double Hopf bifurca tion, Indag. Math., Vol.32 (2021), Iss.1, 33-54

    work page 2021

Show all 60 references
  1. [7]

    Chow, Ch

    S.-N. Chow, Ch. Li, D. Wang, Normal Forms and Bifurcation of Planar Vector Fields, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1994

    1994

  2. [8]

    R. Cushman. Examples of nonintegrable analytic Hamilto nian vector fields with no small divisors, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., v.238 (1978), No.1 , 45-55

    1978

  3. [9]

    Cushman, L.M

    R.H. Cushman, L.M. Bates. Global Aspects of Classical In tegrable Systems, Birkhauser, Basel-Boston-Berlin, 1997

    1997

  4. [10]

    Memoirs of the American Mathematical Soci ety, vol

    Delshams, A., de la Llave, R., Seara, T.M.: A geometric m echanism for diffusion in Hamiltonian systems overcoming the large gap problem: heur istics and rigorous verifi- cation on a model. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Soci ety, vol. 179, no. 844. American Mathematical S...

    2006

  5. [11]

    Deprit, J

    A. Deprit, J. Henrard, Construction of Orbits Asymptot ic to a Periodic Orbit, Astro- nomical J., Vol.74 (1969), 308-316

    1969

  6. [12]

    Devaney, Homoclinic orbits to hyperbolic equilib ria, Annals of New York Acad

    R.S. Devaney, Homoclinic orbits to hyperbolic equilib ria, Annals of New York Acad. of Sci., v.316 (1), 108–117 (1978)

    1978

  7. [13]

    Devaney, Homoclinic orbits in Hamiltonian system s, J

    R.S. Devaney, Homoclinic orbits in Hamiltonian system s, J. Diff. Equat., v.21 (1976), 431–439

    1976

  8. [14]

    Bifurcation Theory and Applications

    H. Duistermaat, Bifurcations of periodic solutions ne ar equilibrium points of Hamilto- nian systems, in “Bifurcation Theory and Applications”: Le ct. 2nd Sess. CIME, Mon- tecatini/Italy, 1983, Ed. by L. Salvadori (Springer, Berli n, 1984), Lect. Notes Math. v.1057, 57–105

    1983

  9. [15]

    Eleonsky, V.G

    V.M. Eleonsky, V.G. Korolev, N.E. Kulagin, L.P. Shilni kov, Branching Branching bi- furcations of vector envelope solitons and integrability o f Hamiltonian systems, JETF Letters, Sov. Phys. JETP, v.72 (4), April 1991, 619-623

    1991

  10. [16]

    Galin, Versal deformations of linear Hamiltonian systems, American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, 1982, 12-31

    D.M. Galin, Versal deformations of linear Hamiltonian systems, American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, 1982, 12-31. 34

    1982

  11. [17]

    Garnier R, Sur une classe de systemes differentiels ab eliens deduits de theorie des equations lineaires, Rend

    R. Garnier R, Sur une classe de systemes differentiels ab eliens deduits de theorie des equations lineaires, Rend. Circ. Math. Palermo v.43 (1919) , No.4, 155-191

    1919

  12. [18]

    Gelfreich, D

    V. Gelfreich, D. Turaev, Arnold Diffusion in a priory cha otic symplectic maps, Commun. Math. Phys., v.353 (2017), 507–547

    2017

  13. [19]

    Glebsky, L.M

    L.Yu. Glebsky, L.M. Lerman. On the small stationary sel f-localized solutions for gener- alized 1D Swift-Hohenberg equation, Chaos: Interdisc. J. N onlin. Sci., v.5, No 3 (1995), 424-431

    1995

  14. [20]

    Gonchenko, S.V

    A.S. Gonchenko, S.V. Gonchenko, D. Turaev, Doubling of invariant curves and chaos in three-dimensional diffeomorphisms, Chaos, v.3 1, 113130 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0068692

    2021 doi

  15. [21]

    Grotta Ragazzo, Nonintegrability of some Hamiltoni an systems, scattering and an- alytic continuation, Comm

    C. Grotta Ragazzo, Nonintegrability of some Hamiltoni an systems, scattering and an- alytic continuation, Comm. Math. Phys. 1994. Vol. 166. P.25 5–277

    1994

  16. [22]

    Grotta Ragazzo, Irregular Dynamics and Homoclinic O rbits to Hamiltonian Saddle Centers, Comm

    C. Grotta Ragazzo, Irregular Dynamics and Homoclinic O rbits to Hamiltonian Saddle Centers, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. L (1997), 105–147

    1997

  17. [23]

    Han ßmann, I

    H. Han ßmann, I. Hoveijn, The 1 : 1 resonance in Hamiltonian systems, J. Diff. Eqs. 266 (2019), 6963-6984

    2019

  18. [24]

    Han ßmann, Local and Semi-Local Bifurcations in Hamiltonian Dyn amical Systems- Results and Examples, LNM, vol

    H. Han ßmann, Local and Semi-Local Bifurcations in Hamiltonian Dyn amical Systems- Results and Examples, LNM, vol. 1893, Springer, 2007

    2007

  19. [25]

    Han βmann, J.-C

    H. Han βmann, J.-C. van der Meer, Algebraic Methods for Determining Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcations in Three-Degree-of-Freedom Systems, J. Dynam.& Diff. Equat., Vol. 17 (2005), No.3, 453-474

    2005

  20. [26]

    Homburg, B

    A.-J. Homburg, B. Sandstede, Homoclinic and Heterocli nic Bifurcations in Vector Fields, Handbook of Dynamical Systems (Eds. H.W. Broer, B. H asselblatt, F. Tak- ens), v.3, 2010, 379-524, DOI: 10.1016/S1874-575X(10)003 16-4

    2010 doi

  21. [27]

    Hoveijn, Versal deformations and normal forms for re versible and hamiltonian linear systems, J

    I. Hoveijn, Versal deformations and normal forms for re versible and hamiltonian linear systems, J. Differential Equations 126 (2) (1996) 408–442

    1996

  22. [28]

    Jahnke, F

    E. Jahnke, F. Emde, F. L¨ osch, Tafeln Hцherer Funktionen. Stuttgart 1960. B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft

    1960

  23. [29]

    Khazin, E.E

    L.G. Khazin, E.E. Schnol. Stability of Critica1 Equili brium States. Manchester/New York, Manchester University Press 1991. XII, 208 pp

    1991

  24. [30]

    Burke, E

    J. Burke, E. Knobloch, Normal form for spatial dynamics in the Swift-Hohenberg equa- tion, Discr. Cont. Dynam. Syst., Supplement, 2007, 170–180

    2007

  25. [31]

    Kocak, Normal Forms and Versa1 Deformations of Linea r Hamiltonian Systems, J

    H. Kocak, Normal Forms and Versa1 Deformations of Linea r Hamiltonian Systems, J. Diff. Equat., v.51, 359-407 (1984). 35

    1984

  26. [32]

    Yu., Lerman L

    Koltsova O. Yu., Lerman L. M. Periodic and homoclinic or bits in a two-parameter unfolding of a Hamiltonian system with a homoclinic orbit to a saddle-center, Int. J. Bifurcation & Chaos, 1995. Vol.5, No.2, 397–408

    1995

  27. [33]

    Families of transverse Poincar´ e homoclinic orbits in 2N- dimensional Hamiltonian systems close to the system with a l oop to a saddle-center, Int

    Koltsova O., Lerman L. Families of transverse Poincar´ e homoclinic orbits in 2N- dimensional Hamiltonian systems close to the system with a l oop to a saddle-center, Int. J. Bifurcation & Chaos, 1996. Vol. 6, No.6. 991–1006

    1996

  28. [34]

    Kudryavtseva, L.M

    E.A. Kudryavtseva, L.M. Lerman, Bifurcations in Integ rable Systems with Three De- grees of Freedom. I, Proceedings of Steklov Inst. of Math., V ol.327 (2024), 130–207

    2024

  29. [35]

    Kulagin, L.M

    N.E. Kulagin, L.M. Lerman, T.G. Shmakova, Fronts, Trav eling Fronts, and Their Sta- bility in the Generalized Swift–Hohenberg Equation, Compu t. Math. Math. Phys., 48:4 (2008), 659–676

    2008

  30. [37]

    Lakshmanan, R

    M. Lakshmanan, R. Sahadevan, Coupled quartic anharmon ic oscillators, Painleve anal- ysis, and integrability, Phys. Rev. A, v.31, N.2, February 1 985

  31. [38]

    Lakshmanan, R

    M. Lakshmanan, R. Sahadevan, Painlev´ e analysis, Lie s ymmetries, and integrability ofcoupled nonlinear oscillators of polynomial type, Phys. Reports, v.224, Nos. I & 2 (1993), 1/emdash.cyr93

    1993

  32. [39]

    A. Laub, K. Meyer, Canonical forms for symplectic and Ha miltonian matrices. Celestial, Mech. 9 (1974), 213-238

    1974

  33. [40]

    Meth- ods of Qualitative Theory of Diff. Equat

    Lerman L. M. Hamiltonian systems with a separatrix loop of a saddle-center, in “Meth- ods of Qualitative Theory of Diff. Equat.” Ed. E.A. Leontovic h-Andronova. Gorky State Univ., 1987. P. 89–103 (in Russian) (Engl. transl.: Selecta Math. Sov., 1991, vol.10, No.3, 297–306)

    1987

  34. [41]

    Complex dynamics and bifurcations in Hami ltonian systems having the transversal homoclinic orbit to a saddle-focus, Chaos: Int erdisc

    L.M.Lerman. Complex dynamics and bifurcations in Hami ltonian systems having the transversal homoclinic orbit to a saddle-focus, Chaos: Int erdisc. J. Nonlin. Sci. 1991. V.1. No.2. P. 174–180

    1991

  35. [42]

    Lerman, Dynamical phenomena near a saddle-focus c onnection in a Hamiltonian system, J

    L.M. Lerman, Dynamical phenomena near a saddle-focus c onnection in a Hamiltonian system, J. Stat. Phys., v. 101, No. 1-2 (2000), 357-372

    2000

  36. [43]

    Lerman, Ya.L

    L.M. Lerman, Ya.L. Umanskiy, Classification of four-di mensional integrable Hamilto- nian systems and Poisson actions of R2 in extended neighborhoods of simple singular points. II, Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math., Vol.78 (1994), No. 2, 479-506

    1994

  37. [44]

    Marsden, A

    J. Marsden, A. Weinstein, Reduction of symplectic mani folds with symmetry, Reports in Math. Phys., 1974. V.5. No.1, 121-130

    1974

  38. [46]

    Meyer, D

    K.R. Meyer, D. Schmidt, Periodic orbits near L4 for mass ratios near the critical mass ration of Routh, Celestial Mechanics, v.4 (1971), 99-109

    1971

  39. [47]

    Mielke, P

    A. Mielke, P. Holmes & O. O’Reilly, Cascades of homoclin ic orbits to, and chaos near, a Hamiltonian saddle-center, J. Dyn. Diff. Eqn. 4 (1992), 95– 126

    1992

  40. [48]

    Morales-Ruiz, C

    J.J. Morales-Ruiz, C. Simo, Non-integrability criter ia for Hamiltonians in the case of Lam´ e normal variational equations, J. Diff. Equat., v.129 ( 1996), 111-135

    1996

  41. [49]

    Morales-Ruiz

    J.J. Morales-Ruiz. Differential Galois Theory and Non- integrability of Hamiltonian Sys- tems, Progress in Mathematics, v.179, Birkh¨ auser: Basel- Boston-Berlin, 1999

    1999

  42. [50]

    Morales-Ruiz, J.M

    J.J. Morales-Ruiz, J.M. Peris, On a Galoisian approach to the splitting of separatrices, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. v.8 (1999) 125–141

    1999

  43. [51]

    A.D. Morozov. Quasi-Conservative Systems: Cycles, Re sonances and Chaos, Advanced Series on Theor. Phys. Sci., v.30, Nonlinear Science Series , Singapoure: World Sci., 1998

    1998

  44. [52]

    Perelomov

    A.M. Perelomov. Integrable systems of classical mechn ics and Lie algebras, Birkh¨ auser: Basel-Boston-Berlin, 1990

    1990

  45. [53]

    Shilnikov, D.V

    L.P. Shilnikov, D.V. Turaev, Super-homoclinic orbits and multi-pulse homoclinic loops in Hamiltonian systems with discrete symmetries, Regul. Ch aotic Dyn. v.2, Nos.3–4 (1997), 126–138

    1997

  46. [54]

    Sanders, Are higher order resonances really interes ting?, Celestial Mech

    J. Sanders, Are higher order resonances really interes ting?, Celestial Mech. v.16 (1978), 421-440

    1978

  47. [55]

    Smale, Topology and Mechanics

    S. Smale, Topology and Mechanics. I, Invent. Math., V.1 0, 305–331, (1970)

    1970

  48. [56]

    Sokol’sky, On the stability of an autonomous Hamil tonian system with two degrees of freedom in the case of equal frequencies, J

    A.G. Sokol’sky, On the stability of an autonomous Hamil tonian system with two degrees of freedom in the case of equal frequencies, J. Appl. Math. Me ch., 38(5), 741–749 (1974- 5)

    1974

  49. [57]

    Yanderbauwhede, B

    A. Yanderbauwhede, B. Fiedler, Homoclinic period blow -up in reversible and conserva- tive systems, Z. angew. Math. Phys. v.43 (1992), 292–318

    1992

  50. [58]

    Yagasaki, Horseshoes in Two-Degree-of-Freedom Ham iltonian Systems with Saddle- Centers, Arch

    K. Yagasaki, Horseshoes in Two-Degree-of-Freedom Ham iltonian Systems with Saddle- Centers, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., v.154 (2000), 275–296

    2000

  51. [59]

    Yoshida, A criterion for the non existence of an addit ional integral in Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential, Physica D 29 (1987), 1 28–142

    H. Yoshida, A criterion for the non existence of an addit ional integral in Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential, Physica D 29 (1987), 1 28–142

    1987

  52. [60]

    Ziglin, Branching of solutions and nonexistence o f first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics

    S.L. Ziglin, Branching of solutions and nonexistence o f first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics. I; II. Funct. Anal. Appl., 16:3 (1982), 181–189, Funct. Anal. Appl., 17:1 (1983), 6–17. 37

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.