Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the circumstellar medium of Herbig Ae/Be stars

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In 50 Herbig Ae/Be stars, the 6.2-micron PAH band shifts blueward as stellar temperature rises, and this is the largest sample yet used to test that peak shift.

desk verdict Solid, useful HAeBe PAH survey with public data; the headline 6.2 µm–Teff shift is plausible but under-quantified at the current spectral resolution. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14218 v1 pith:IGDQAU2U submitted 2025-06-17 astro-ph.SR

R. Arun , Blesson Mathew , B. Shridharan , K. Ujjwal , Akhil Krishna R , G. Maheswar , Sreeja S. Kartha This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords HerbigAe/Bestarspolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonsmid-infraredspectroscopySpitzerIRSPAHpeakshiftcircumstellardiskspre-main-sequenceionization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a mid-infrared survey of 124 Herbig Ae/Be stars using newly processed Spitzer/IRS spectra, classifying each by its molecular and dust features into PAH-only, silicate-only, both, featureless, and HAC groups. It finds PAH emission in 64% of the sample and silicates in 50%, with detections peaking in the effective-temperature range 7000–11000 K. The central result is that the 6.2 micron PAH band, detected in 50 stars, shifts blueward as stellar effective temperature increases, and this is the largest sample yet used to test that peak shift. The adjacent 6.0 micron feature does not shift with it, which the authors take as evidence that the two bands arise from different molecular vibrations: C=O carbonyl or olefinic C=C stretching rather than aromatic C–C stretching. If correct, the shift maps how ultraviolet processing reshapes the PAH population in planet-forming disks and gives JWST a concrete target to check with spatially resolved spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 6.2 micron PAH emission complex, produced by aromatic C–C stretching vibrations, together with the weaker 6.0 micron band blended on its blue side. The analysis isolates these bands by subtracting a cubic-spline continuum and deblending the two peaks with a double-Gaussian model, then compares the measured 6.2 micron peak position with stellar effective temperature and assigns it to Class A (6.19–6.235 microns), B (6.235–6.28 microns), or C (6.28–6.32 microns) profiles. The argument that carries the paper's main claim is the observed blueward progression of this peak across a 50-star sample, with the 6.0 micron feature serving as a counterexample that does not follow the same trend.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same 50 spectra with an independent continuum definition, such as a local linear baseline or a spectral decomposition that does not rely on spline anchor points, and test whether the 6.2 micron peak still moves blueward with effective temperature. If the trend disappears or weakens when the continuum choice changes, the claimed shift would be an artifact of the fitting procedure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in Herbig Ae/Be stars the peak wavelength of the 6.2 micron PAH emission band is not fixed but moves blueward, from Class B/C toward Class A profiles, as the effective temperature of the central star rises, with 50 sources providing the largest sample yet used to test this correlation. The authors interpret the shift as progressive UV-driven chemical processing: hotter stars destroy aliphatic sidegroups, dehydrogenate PAHs, and fragment smaller molecules, leaving a more compact, stable aromatic population that emits at shorter wavelengths. The weaker 6.0 micron band, by contrast, stays near a median of 6.02 microns regardless of temperature, implying a distinct carrier that does not respond to the same processing. The paper also finds that PAH detections cluster in stars with spectral index n2−24 > −1 and flared disk morphologies, and reports what it describes as the first systematic measurement of the 11.0/11.2 micron PAH ratio in a Herbig Ae/Be sample, spanning 0.03–0.12 and indicating a range of ionization conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The measured 6.2 micron peak wavelengths are not systematically biased by the cubic-spline continuum subtraction and double-Gaussian deblending; if hotter stars have differently shaped dust continua that tilt the fitted peak, the blueward shift with temperature could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future PAH surveys of intermediate-mass pre-main-sequence stars can prioritize targets with n2−24 > −1 and flared morphologies, where PAH detection rates are highest.
  • PAH emission is most frequently detected in the 7000–11000 K range and declines at higher temperatures, consistent with ultraviolet destruction or chemical processing of PAHs in hotter environments.
  • The blueward 6.2 micron shift with stellar temperature supports a picture in which hotter radiation fields leave a smaller, more processed PAH population.
  • Because the 6.0 micron feature stays near 6.02 microns while 6.2 shifts, the two bands trace distinct molecular carriers, a distinction future high-resolution JWST spectra can test directly.
  • The measured 11.0/11.2 micron ratios, spanning 0.03–0.12, show that PAH ionization in Herbig Ae/Be disks overlaps PDR-like conditions and reaches higher fractions in flared disks such as PDS 144N.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 6.2 micron shift is real, JWST spectroscopy of the same targets should reproduce the blueward progression within spatially resolved disks, confirming it is an intrinsic processing trend rather than a sample-level artifact.
  • The stationary 6.0 micron feature offers a partial control: a continuum-fitting artifact that shifted both bands together would be ruled out, though an artifact affecting only the 6.2 micron blend remains possible.
  • A prospective test would observe the roughly half of known Herbig Ae/Be stars not yet covered by Spitzer, selecting targets with n2−24 > −1, and check whether PAH detection rates there exceed those in lower-index stars as predicted.
  • The 11.0/11.2 ratios overlapping PDR values suggest that disk PAHs can be as ionized as those in photodissociation regions, implying heavy processing; spatially resolved mid-infrared observations could separate disk from nebular PAH populations to test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a mid-infrared spectroscopic survey of 124 Herbig Ae/Be stars using uniformly processed Spitzer IRS spectra from the CASSISjuice database. The authors visually classify the spectra into five categories (PAH-only, silicate-only, PAH+silicate, no feature, and HACs), compute detection frequencies as functions of effective temperature and the 2–24 micron spectral index, and report that the 6.2 micron PAH peak shifts blueward with increasing Teff while the 6.0 micron feature remains roughly constant. They also measure the 11.0/11.2 micron PAH ratio in a subset of stars and interpret the results as evidence for Teff-driven PAH processing and distinct molecular origins for the 6.0 micron band.

Significance. If the 6.2 micron–Teff correlation is quantitatively robust, this would be the largest sample yet used to test that peak shift and would provide valuable statistical evidence for temperature-driven PAH processing in intermediate-mass pre-main-sequence stars. The paper also offers a useful uniformly reduced sample and classification of the public SSHC catalog. However, the central quantitative claims are currently supported only by scatter plots and visual classifications, without per-point uncertainties, significance tests, or robustness checks against the fitting procedure. The paper's value as a catalog and classification resource is real, but the headline astrophysical conclusions need substantial additional analysis before they can be accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.6, Figure 5] The central claim that the 6.2 micron PAH peak shifts blueward with Teff is supported only by a scatter plot; no per-source peak-position uncertainties, fitted slope, correlation coefficient, or significance test are reported. At Spitzer IRS low resolution (R approximately 60–127, corresponding to Delta-lambda approximately 0.05–0.10 micron), the measurement uncertainty is comparable to the quoted Class A–B separation of 6.19–6.28 microns, so the claim requires a quantitative statistic (e.g., Spearman rank correlation with a bootstrap confidence interval) before it can be regarded as established.
  2. [Section 3.6 and Figure A.1] The continuum subtraction and deblending procedure is underspecified: the cubic-spline anchor points are not listed, the initial conditions and number of Gaussians in the double-Gaussian fit are not given, and no robustness test is presented. Because hotter stars may have different underlying continuum shapes, the apparent Teff trend could be a fitting artifact; the authors should test stability against alternative continuum definitions, anchor choices, and deblending assumptions, and report the resulting dispersion in fitted peak wavelengths.
  3. [Section 3.6] The aggregate Teff trend is vulnerable to a known environmental confound acknowledged in the same section: Herbig Be stars show a mix of Class A and Class B PAH profiles 'irrespective of Teff,' and associated reflection nebulae contribute Class A PAHs. Since Be stars populate the high-TeFF end of the sample, the blueward shift could reflect nebular contamination rather than stellar-temperature-driven processing. The authors should analyze the Herbig Ae and Herbig Be subsamples separately, or explicitly test whether the trend persists after removing stars with associated nebulosity.
  4. [Section 3.3, Figure 3] The PAH and silicate detection-frequency histograms are plotted without error bars or confidence intervals. With 10 bins of 12 stars each, binomial counting uncertainties are substantial (about +/-14 percent for a 50% detection fraction), so the claimed 'sweet spot' around 7000–11000 K and the high-temperature decline need a significance test or confidence intervals before they can be considered robust.
  5. [Section 3.6, Figure 5 right panel] The claim that the 6.0 micron feature does not shift is based only on a 3xMAD visual criterion, with no correlation coefficient or significance test relating the 6.0 micron peak position to the 6.2 micron peak position or to Teff. Since both peaks are extracted from the same double-Gaussian fit, correlated fitting errors are possible, and the 'distinct origin' conclusion requires a quantitative test.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.8 and Section 4] The reported 11.0/11.2 micron ratios are internally inconsistent: Section 3.8 gives a range of 0.03–0.12 and cites HD 97300 and PDS 144N values of 0.16 and 0.14, while the Conclusion states a range of 0.046–0.12. These numbers should be reconciled.
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption describes the left panel as a transition 'from Class B/C (circumstellar) to Class A (nebular),' but the text defines Class C as low-mass T Tauri disk profiles; please clarify whether Class C profiles occur in the HAeBe sample or only in the comparison literature.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'cubic spine' in Section 3.6, 'spilne anchor points' in Section 3.8, 'PSD 144N' in the Figure 4 caption, and duplicated 'stretching stretching' in Section 3.7.
  4. [Section 3.7, Figure 6] The Pearson correlation matrix is reported without p-values or corresponding sample sizes for each ratio pair; adding significance levels would help the reader assess the strength of the 0.9–0.99 correlations.
  5. [Section 2.2] Capitalization of 'CASSISjuice' is inconsistent (CASSISjuice vs CASSISJuice); please unify the spelling throughout the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central 6.2 µm–Teff shift is an empirical measurement compared against externally sourced stellar temperatures and independent PAH class templates.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are the PAH detection statistics, the 6.2 µm peak-position trend with Teff, the 6.0 µm non-shift, and the 11.0/11.2 ionization ratios. None of these reduce by construction to inputs. Teff values come from Vioque et al. (2018), photometry-based spectral indices from 2MASS/WISE, and PAH class boundaries from Peeters et al. (2002); the peak wavelengths are measured from CASSISjuice-processed Spitzer spectra via spline continuum subtraction and Gaussian deblending, not from a parameter fitted to the same Teff trend. The 6.0 µm non-shift is compared to an external Orion PDR JWST template. Self-citations to Arun et al. (2023) provide the SSHC sample and C60/HAC identifications, but the classification statistics, peak-shift correlation, and band ratios are newly derived here from the spectra; the cited catalog is a data resource, not a result that is being relabeled as a prediction. The absence of quantitative uncertainties and robustness tests for the 6.2 µm centroid is a statistical-correctness concern, not circularity, because no fitted quantity is being renamed as an independent confirmation. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input, and no load-bearing conclusion rests solely on the authors' prior uniqueness or modeling claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and no free parameters in a physical model; the free parameters are analysis choices (binning, spline anchors, statistical thresholds). The main axioms are standard domain assumptions about PAH emission mechanisms and the reliability of the adopted stellar parameters and data reduction pipeline.

free parameters (4)
  • Teff bin edges (10 bins of 12 stars) = Not specified; binned by sorted Teff
    The detection-frequency sweet spot in Sec 3.3 depends on this binning choice; no error bars are given on the per-bin fractions.
  • Spline anchor points for continuum subtraction = e.g., 10.0, 10.5, 10.87, 11.7, 13.0, 14.0, 15.20 micron for the 11 micron region; unspecified for 5-7 micron
    Peak positions of the 6.2 and 6.0 micron bands (Sec 3.6) and 11.0/11.2 fluxes (Sec 3.8) depend on where the spline is pinned; no sensitivity test is reported.
  • 3xMAD acceptance threshold = 3 times median absolute deviation
    Used in Sec 3.6 to claim the 6.0 micron feature does not shift; the threshold is arbitrary and no statistical test is reported.
  • n2-24 greater than -1 selection threshold = -1
    Derived from the same sample's clustering (Sec 3.2) and then recommended as a targeting criterion; it is an in-sample empirical cut, not an a priori prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PAH emission is excited by UV fluorescence and traces disk or nebular material
    Throughout Sec 3, PAH features are interpreted as emission from circumstellar molecules; this is standard for HAeBe stars (e.g., Acke et al. 2010).
  • domain assumption The 6.2 micron band arises from aromatic C-C stretching; the 6.0 micron band from C=O or olefinic C=C
    Adopted from Peeters et al. 2002 and Hsia et al. 2016 in Sec 3.6; the paper's distinct-origin conclusion depends on this assignment.
  • domain assumption The 11.0/11.2 micron ratio traces PAH ionization state
    Sec 3.8 relies on this established diagnostic (Hony et al. 2001; Tielens 2008).
  • domain assumption Stellar parameters (Teff, extinction, distances) from Vioque et al. 2018 are accurate
    Used to compute n2-24 and bin by Teff in Sec 3.2 and 3.3.
  • domain assumption CASSISjuice pipeline produces reliable reduced Spitzer/IRS spectra
    The entire analysis rests on the CASSISjuice reduction described in Sec 2.2; no independent validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the circumstellar medium of Herbig Ae/Be stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IGDQAU2U

@misc{pith2026250614218,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the circumstellar medium of Herbig Ae/Be stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IGDQAU2U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14218}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive mid-infrared spectroscopic survey of 124 Herbig Ae/Be stars using newly processed Spitzer/IRS spectra from the newly released CASSISjuice database. Based on prominent dust and molecular signatures (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, silicates, and hydrogenated amorphous carbons), we classify the stars into five groups. Our analysis reveals that 64% of the spectra show PAH emission, with detections peaking in the stellar effective temperature range 7000-11000 K (B9-A5). Silicate features appear in 50% of the sample and likewise diminish at higher temperatures. Additionally, we find that future PAH studies can focus on Herbig Ae/Be stars with a spectral index ($n_{2-24}$ > -1) and flared morphologies to maximize PAH detections. The 6.2 $\mu$m PAH band is the most frequently observed in our sample, shifting blueward with increasing stellar temperature, and this is the largest sample yet used to test that peak shift. The weaker 6.0 $\mu$m feature does not shift with 6.2 $\mu$m, implying a distinct origin of C=O (carbonyl) or olefinic C=C stretching relative to C--C vibrations. We examined the 11.0/11.2 $\mu$m PAH ratio using high-resolution Spitzer spectra for the first time in a sample of Herbig Ae/Be stars, finding a range of ionization conditions. This study provides a strong foundation for future JWST observations of intermediate-mass pre-main-sequence stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14218 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative examples of Spitzer IRS spectra for HAeBe stars, categorized according to their molecular features. The left panel displays low-resolution spectra and the right panel shows high￾resolution spectra, with fluxes plotted in arbitrary units for clarity. Color coding denotes the classifi￾cation: blue for P, red for S, green for PS, and yellow for NF. Major PAH and silicate features are denoted with dashed … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of the continuum spectral index ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detection frequency of PAH (left) and silicate (right) features as a function of effective tempera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top row: Optical/near-infrared images showcasing the morphological diversity around the three reference stars. Left: DSS2 color composite of HD97300 (B9 star), highlighting its bright reflection nebulosity. Center: HST/ACS F165LP image of PDS144N (A2 star) seen nearly …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panel: The peak wavelength of the 6.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Correlation matrix of selected PAH band ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of the 11.0/11.2 PAH band ratio versus stellar effective temperature for our HAeBe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040400 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...426..151A 426, 151

    Acke B., van den Ancker M. E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040400 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...426..151A 426, 151

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040400 2004

  2. [2]

    E., Meeus G., Tielens A

    Acke B., Bouwman J., Juh \'a sz A., Henning T., van den Ancker M. E., Meeus G., Tielens A. G. G. M., Waters L. B. F. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...718..558A 718, 558

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/558 2010

  3. [3]

    Akhila D., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp..903A

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf914 2025

  4. [4]

    Alonso-Albi T., Fuente A., Bachiller R., Neri R., Planesas P., Testi L., Bern \'e O., Joblin C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200810401 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...497..117A 497, 117

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810401 2009

  5. [5]

    S., Narang M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1601A 523, 1601

    Arun R., Mathew B., Manoj P., Maheswar G., Shridharan B., Kartha S. S., Narang M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1601A 523, 1601

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1511 2023

  6. [6]

    Bauschlicher Jr. C. W., Peeters E., Allamandola L. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/533424 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678..316B 678, 316

    doi:10.1086/533424 2008

  7. [7]

    Bern \'e O., Montillaud J., Joblin C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A.133B 577, A133

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425338 2015

  8. [8]

    Boersma C., Bouwman J., Lahuis F., van Kerckhoven C., Tielens A. G. G. M., Waters L. B. F. M., Henning T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...484..241B 484, 241

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078001 2008

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Bouwman J., Meeus G., de Koter A., Hony S., Dominik C., Waters L. B. F. M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010878 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...375..950B 375, 950

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.2960C 448, 2960

    Candian A., Sarre P. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.2960C 448, 2960

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    L., Umana G., Trigilio C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703..585C 703, 585

    Cerrigone L., Hora J. L., Umana G., Trigilio C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703..585C 703, 585

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    Chown R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..75C 685, A75

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    R., Oudmaijer R

    Fairlamb J. R., Oudmaijer R. D., Mendigutia I., Ilee J. D., van den Ancker M. E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2643 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.4721F 464, 4721

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Furlan E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505468 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..165..568F 165, 568

    2006 doi

  7. [15]

    C., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...459..545G 459, 545

    Geers V. C., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...459..545G 459, 545

    2006 doi

  8. [16]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acc44b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947L...6G 947, L6

    Grant S. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acc44b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947L...6G 947, L6

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    P., Wilking B

    Greene T. P., Wilking B. A., Andre P., Young E. T., Lada C. J., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174763 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...434..614G 434, 614

    1994 doi

  10. [18]

    Habart E., Natta A., Kr \"u gel E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...427..179H 427, 179

    2004 doi

  11. [19]

    Hony S., Van Kerckhoven C., Peeters E., Tielens A. G. G. M., Hudgins D. M., Allamandola L. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...370.1030H 370, 1030

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744...54H 744, 54

    Hornbeck J. B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744...54H 744, 54

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    Hsia C.-H., Sadjadi S., Zhang Y., Kwok S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832..213H 832, 213

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Juh \'a sz A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/431 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..431J 721, 431

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589818 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684..411K 684, 411

    Keller L. D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589818 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684..411K 684, 411

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    Kessler-Silacci J., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499330 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...639..275K 639, 275

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    J., 1987, in Peimbert M., Jugaku J., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Lada C. J., 1987, in Peimbert M., Jugaku J., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions. pp 1--17

    1987

  18. [26]

    arXiv:2309.06876

    Lebouteiller V., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2309.06876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230906876L p. arXiv:2309.06876

    2023 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    J., Spoon H

    Lebouteiller V., Barry D. J., Spoon H. W. W., Bernard-Salas J., Sloan G. C., Houck J. R., Weedman D. W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..196....8L 196, 8

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Goes C., Sloan G

    Lebouteiller V., Barry D. J., Goes C., Sloan G. C., Spoon H. W. W., Weedman D. W., Bernard-Salas J., Houck J. R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..218...21L 218, 21

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..64M 555, A64

    Maaskant K. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..64M 555, A64

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    Manoj P., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..193...11M 193, 11

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    Maragkoudakis A., Peeters E., Ricca A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..642M 494, 642

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Maragkoudakis A., Peeters E., Ricca A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad465 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5354M 520, 5354

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Meeus G., Waters L. B. F. M., Bouwman J., van den Ancker M. E., Waelkens C., Malfait K., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...365..476M 365, 476

    2001 doi

  26. [34]

    Mehner A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...585A..81M 585, A81

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    C., Vink J

    Mottram J. C., Vink J. S., Oudmaijer R. D., Patel M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11699.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377.1363M 377, 1363

    2007

  28. [36]

    F., Kraus M., Oksala M

    Muratore M. F., Kraus M., Oksala M. E., Arias M. L., Cidale L., Borges Fernandes M., Liermann A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...13M 149, 13

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.5166N 524, 5166

    Nidhi S., Mathew B., Shridharan B., Arun R., Anusha R., Kartha S. S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.5166N 524, 5166

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Peeters E., Hony S., Van Kerckhoven C., Tielens A. G. G. M., Allamandola L. J., Hudgins D. M., Bauschlicher C. W., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...390.1089P 390, 1089

    2002 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Allamandola L

    Peeters E., Bauschlicher Charles W. J., Allamandola L. J., Tielens A. G. G. M., Ricca A., Wolfire M. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836..198P 836, 198

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    D., Duch \^e ne G., Kalas P., Graham J

    Perrin M. D., Duch \^e ne G., Kalas P., Graham J. R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...645.1272P 645, 1272

    2006 doi

  33. [41]

    Pino T., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...490..665P 490, 665

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    Roberts K. R. G., Smith K. T., Sarre P. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20552.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.3277R 421, 3277

    2012

  35. [43]

    F., Peeters E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/20066262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507..261S 507, 261

    Sch \"u tz O., Meeus G., Sterzik M. F., Peeters E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/20066262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507..261S 507, 261

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    Y., Li A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..291S 835, 291

    Seok J. Y., Li A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..291S 835, 291

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    B., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-023-09952-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...62S 44, 62

    Shridharan B., Mathew B., Arun R., Cysil T. B., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-023-09952-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...62S 44, 62

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    C., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/444371 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632..956S 632, 956

    Sloan G. C., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/444371 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632..956S 632, 956

    2005 doi

  39. [47]

    Smith J. D. T., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...656..770S 656, 770

    2007 doi

  40. [48]

    Temmink M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.117T 686, A117

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Tielens A. G. G. M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ARA&A..46..289T 46, 289

    2008

  42. [50]

    S., Akhil K

    Ujjwal K., Kartha S. S., Akhil K. R., Mathew B., Subramanian S., Sudheesh T. P., Thomas R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..71U 684, A71

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Vieira S. L. A., Corradi W. J. B., Alencar S. H. P., Mendes L. T. S., Torres C. A. O., Quast G. R., Guimar \ a es M. M., da Silva L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379553 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.2971V 126, 2971

    2003 doi

  44. [52]

    D., Baines D., Mendigut \' a I., P \'e rez-Mart \' nez R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.128V 620, A128

    Vioque M., Oudmaijer R. D., Baines D., Mendigut \' a I., P \'e rez-Mart \' nez R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.128V 620, A128

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Vioque M., Oudmaijer R. D., Schreiner M., Mendigut \' a I., Baines D., Mowlavi N., P \'e rez-Mart \' nez R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..21V 638, A21

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    A., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132427 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989PASP..101..229W 101, 229

    Wilking B. A., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132427 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989PASP..101..229W 101, 229

    1989 doi

  47. [55]

    Zhang Y.-J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...38Z 259, 38

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    arXiv:2410.18909

    Zhang C., Hales J., Peeters E., Cami J., Sidhu A., Zhen J., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18909 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241018909Z p. arXiv:2410.18909

    2024 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    van Boekel R., Min M., Waters L. B. F. M., de Koter A., Dominik C., van den Ancker M. E., Bouwman J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..189V 437, 189

    2005 doi

  50. [58]

    M., Allamandola L

    van Diedenhoven B., Peeters E., Van Kerckhoven C., Hony S., Hudgins D. M., Allamandola L. J., Tielens A. G. G. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422404 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..928V 611, 928

    2004 doi

  51. [59]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib codin...

  52. [60]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifc...

  53. [61]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bib...

  54. [62]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "]" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty pages empty not booktitle empty not or or ""...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.