Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Quasinormal coupled-mode analysis of dynamic gain in exceptional-point lasers

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near-EP laser combs collapse to a handful of algebraic equations.

desk verdict QNM-PALT is a genuine reduction that reproduces the 1D comb spectrum, but the main-text Eq. (15) is invalid as written; the resolvent definition in Appendix D fixes it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12066 v1 pith:IIZA25AC submitted 2024-12-16 physics.optics

Hao He , Xingwei Gao , Alexander Cerjan , Chia Wei Hsu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords exceptionalpointslaserdynamicsfrequencycombquasinormalmodescoupled-modetheoryMaxwell-BlochequationsPadeapproximantself-modulatedlasers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a reduced model, QNM-PALT, for lasers tuned near an exceptional point (EP), where the gain medium's population inversion oscillates and spontaneously generates a frequency comb. The central claim is that the full Maxwell-Bloch/PALT equations, which couple many frequencies through a spatially varying dynamic inversion, can be collapsed onto just two passive quasinormal modes and solved as algebraic equations for the comb amplitudes and frequencies. The reduction works because near the EP the two modes have essentially the same spatial profile in the gain region, and because a simple rational-function (Padé) fit accurately represents the saturable-gain integral. The model quantitatively reproduces the previously computed comb spectrum for a 1D coupled-cavity laser while removing the need for dense spatial discretization. If it holds, it gives designers a minimal physical picture of comb generation as repeated resonant excitation by the oscillating inversion, and a route to 2D and 3D EP-comb lasers.

What carries the argument

Quasinormal modes (QNMs) are the complex-frequency eigenmodes of the open, non-Hermitian cavity; they form an orthogonal basis under a regularized inner product and convert a spatially localized source into mode amplitudes. The argument rests on three objects: the two near-resonance QNMs in the EP pair, whose profiles coalesce to $E_\alpha(x)$ inside the pumped cavity; the integral function $F(y)=\int W_{\mathrm{in}}(x)E_\alpha(x)^2/[1+|E_\alpha(x)|^2y]dx$, which encodes spatial hole burning; and the $[0/1]$ Padé approximant $F(y)\approx\lambda/(1+\mu y)$, whose complex constants are fitted once and whose error stays within a few percent over the comb's operating domain. The effective intensity matrix $\bar{\bar{I}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ assembles all inter-comb couplings; diagonalizing it lets every integral be evaluated at scalar eigenvalues, making the final system purely algebraic.

What would settle it

Take the same coupled-cavity design and weaken the middle DBR so the two QNMs no longer share a proportional profile inside the active cavity; if QNM-PALT still matches the brute-force PALT comb spectrum to within a few percent, the shared-profile assumption is not load-bearing, whereas if the mismatch grows as the profile overlap shrinks, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that near-EP laser dynamics described by PALT can be projected onto the two quasinormal modes closest to the gain center, with field expansion $E_m(x)=a_m\tilde{E}_a(x)+b_m\tilde{E}_b(x)$. Using the shared-profile property $\tilde{E}_{a,b}(x)=\alpha_{1,2}E_\alpha(x)$ inside the active cavity, the PALT equations reduce to Eqs. (11)-(14), with only amplitudes $\{a_m,b_m\}$ and frequencies $\{\omega_0,\omega_d\}$ as unknowns. The key technical step is diagonalizing the space-independent effective intensity matrix $\bar{\bar{I}}_{\mathrm{eff}}=\bar{\bar{P}}^{-1}\bar{\bar{\Lambda}}\bar{\bar{P}}$, pushing its eigenvalues through the integral function $F(y)$, and then replacing $F(y)$ by the $[0/1]$ Padé approximant $\lambda/(1+\mu y)$. The resulting purely algebraic system reproduces the brute-force PALT comb spectrum shown in Fig. 5, with residual error attributed to neglected QNMs and the Padé fit.

Load-bearing premise

The two exceptional-point modes are assumed to have the same spatial profile inside the pumped cavity ($\tilde{E}_{a,b}=\alpha_{1,2}E_\alpha$); if that coalescence fails, the integral equations no longer factor into the algebraic system and the diagonalization-based reduction breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full comb solution can be obtained from a small set of algebraic unknowns, so scanning pump strength and cavity parameters becomes cheap enough for design optimization.
  • Because the formalism is dimension-agnostic, the same reduction applies to 2D and 3D cavities once the QNM inner product is replaced by the appropriate form, enabling on-chip EP-comb sources.
  • The Padé approximation explains why lumped saturable-gain models work despite spatially nonuniform field and pump: the rational fit absorbs the hole-burning integral accurately.
  • The framework recasts comb teeth as repeated resonant excitations of the EP pair by the oscillating population inversion, giving a mechanistic explanation of the self-generated comb.
  • It opens the door to studying time-varying scattering and nonreciprocal transmission in self-modulated lasers without full spatiotemporal simulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-mode algebraic reduction should generalize to higher-order EPs by replacing the 2-QNM basis with three coalescing modes, yielding an analogous matrix eigenvalue problem.
  • One could use QNM-PALT to inversely design the pump profile (not just its strength) to maximize comb bandwidth or power, since the Padé fit and QNM parameters are fixed from the passive cavity.
  • The comb threshold might be identifiable as the point where an eigenvalue of the effective intensity matrix crosses a stability boundary, providing an analytic design criterion rather than a root-finding trace.
  • If the shared-profile assumption degrades gradually away from the EP, the algebraic model should remain predictive in a finite neighborhood; mapping that neighborhood would give a practical validity bound for 2D and 3D extensions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a quasinormal-mode (QNM) expansion of the periodic-inversion ab initio laser theory (PALT) for near-exceptional-point (EP) lasers, called QNM-PALT. Starting from the Maxwell-Bloch equations in the PALT form, the authors expand each frequency-comb component onto two passive QNMs of a 1D coupled gain-loss cavity, approximate the spatial saturation integral F(y) by a [0/1] Padé approximant, and thereby reduce the spatially resolved PALT equations to a small algebraic system for the modal amplitudes {a_m, b_m} and the comb parameters {ω0, ωd}. The resulting comb spectra and lasing thresholds are compared with the exact Green's-function PALT solution of the same 1D structure in Figs. 5 and 6, showing quantitative agreement for the tested pump range. The paper claims that the same reduction generalizes directly to 2D and 3D.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a minimal and computationally inexpensive model connecting local dynamic population inversion to resonant modal interactions in EP lasers, which is a useful step beyond purely numerical PALT and beyond phenomenological static-gain TCMT. The central positive evidence is strong: the comb spectrum in Fig. 5f is not fitted to the target data, and the Padé coefficients are fitted only to the auxiliary function F(y), not to the comb spectrum; the comparison with the exact PALT solution in Figs. 5c-f and 6 is a genuine benchmark. The paper also gives a clear physical interpretation of frequency-comb generation as successive resonant excitations by the oscillating inversion. The main reservations are that the central algebraic step is written inconsistently in the main text, and that the profile-collapse assumption on which the reduction rests is asserted rather than quantitatively delimited.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (13) and (15); Appendix D, Eq. (D6)] The central reduction is not supported as written. In Sec. IV the matrix generalization of F is defined element-wise, [F(Ieff)]_{mn} = F[(Ieff)_{mn}], and Eq. (15) then asserts F(P^{-1}ΛP)δ = P^{-1}F(Λ)Pδ. An element-wise application is not a matrix function and does not commute with similarity transformations: for diagonal Λ, [F(Λ)]_{mn}=F(0) for m≠n, which is generally nonzero, so F(Λ) is a full matrix rather than a diagonal one and the spectral mapping in Eq. (15) fails. The correct construction appears only in Appendix D, Eq. (D6), where M is defined through the matrix inverse [I + Ieff |E_α(x)|^2]^{-1}; that definition does satisfy the spectral mapping and yields the desired diagonal F(Λ) in Eq. (D8). Because Eq. (15) is the step that removes all spatial integrals and produces the algebraic QNM-PALT system, a reader following the main-text definition cannot reproduce the method. Please adopt the Appendix D definition in the main text, or prove the claimed identity for the element-wise definition (which is not true in general).
  2. [Sec. IV and Appendix C, Eq. (C2)] The assumption that the two EP QNMs share a single spatial profile inside the pumped cavity, Ẽ_{a,b}(x) = α_{1,2} E_α(x), is load-bearing: it is what reduces Eqs. (11)-(12) to a scalar α-weighted form and permits the subsequent diagonalization of Ieff. The paper says this is 'guaranteed by the weak spatial coupling limit in such EP-laser [24]', but no derivation is given and only one numerical example is shown (Figs. 4d-e). If this profile collapse fails outside the tested parameter region (e.g., for stronger inter-cavity coupling, a different pump profile, or a larger distance from the EP), the algebraic reduction and the F(y) eigenvalue argument break down. Please provide a quantitative characterization of the validity range, or a systematic test in which the profile mismatch is varied, and discuss how this affects the claimed direct generalization to 2D and 3D.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V] The statement that 'all key parameters in QNM-PALT have closed form expressions and can be computed with passive QNM solutions' overstates the role of the Padé coefficients λ and μ, which are fitted numerically from precomputed values of F(y) (Sec. III, Eq. (7); Appendix E). They are not fitted to the comb spectrum, but they are numerical fits rather than closed-form expressions.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (15)] After fixing the matrix-function definition, please use distinct notation for the element-wise operation and the spectral matrix function, so that the similarity-transformation step is unambiguous.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos and notation inconsistencies: 'Pad´e apprixmant' for 'Padé approximant' in Sec. IV and Appendix E; 'D_p' versus 'D_max' in the Fig. 5 caption and text; and 'constant phase different' should be 'constant phase difference' in the Fig. 4 caption.
  4. [Appendix E, Fig. 8] The color scale in Fig. 8 saturates at 100% and the contour labels are sparse; a log-scale color bar would make the claimed 2% error region around the plotted eigenvalues easier to verify.
  5. [Sec. V] The introduction and discussion describe the extension to 2D and 3D as 'direct', but the derivation uses 1D-specific ingredients (the inner product in Eq. (2), the boundary terms, and the pump window W_in(x)). Please state explicitly which steps need modification in higher dimensions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QNM-PALT comb spectrum is an honest output of a reduced model, benchmarked against an independent Green's-function solution rather than reconstructed from fitted comb data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The unknowns {a_m, b_m, omega0, omegad} in Eqs. (11)-(14) are solved from algebraic equations; the Pade constants {lambda, mu} in Eq. (7) are fitted to the auxiliary integral F(y), not to the final comb spectrum, and the resulting spectra in Fig. 5d,f are then compared with the exact PALT solution in Fig. 5c,e. The profile-collapse assumption E_a = alpha_1 E_alpha (Eq. C2) is load-bearing for the algebraic reduction, but it is justified by the authors' prior PALT work [24] and is also directly visible in the computed QNM profiles of Fig. 4d-e, so it is a physical input rather than a disguised restatement of the target result. The apparent inconsistency between the element-wise definition of Fbar in Eq. (13) and the similarity-transformation identity in Eq. (15) is a mathematical-consistency issue (Appendix D implicitly uses the spectral definition), not a case of the prediction reducing to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations to [24] are normal prior-work citations and do not, by themselves, make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on standard QNM expansion, two-QNM truncation, the profile-collapse assumption, and a Pade approximation with fitted coefficients. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Pade coefficients lambda, mu for F(y) = complex constants, not numerically stated
    Fitted from precomputed values of the integral function F(y) in Eq. (7) and Appendix E; they enter every QNM-PALT equation and set the gain saturation shape.
  • Passive conductivity sigma = tuned with pump to maintain near-EP operation
    Sec. IV and Fig. 5 caption state that the absorption sigma is tuned with the pump to ensure near-EP operation; this is a hand-adjusted physical parameter, not an output of the model.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The passive QNMs form a complete basis, and a two-QNM truncation captures the response because off-resonance QNMs decay as Lorentzians.
    Invoked in Sec. III and Sec. IV; see text 'only near-resonance QNMs dominate the cavity response' and the Lorentzian factor in Eq. (4).
  • domain assumption Within the pumped cavity, the two EP QNMs share a single spatial profile E_alpha(x), with E_a,b = alpha_{1,2} E_alpha.
    Appendix C Eq. (C2), used in Sec. IV before Eqs. (11)-(12); justified only by the weak spatial coupling limit and verified for the single example in Fig. 4.
  • ad hoc to paper The [0/1] Pade approximant F(y) approximately lambda/(1+mu y) is accurate for all relevant complex y (eigenvalues of I_eff).
    Appendix E and Fig. 8 show this holds for the studied case; it is a numerical approximation and is not proven in general.
  • domain assumption PALT equations (9)-(10) from ref. [24] correctly describe EP-laser dynamics.
    The paper builds on the prior PALT theory and uses it as the exact benchmark; this is a published result from the same group.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasinormal coupled-mode analysis of dynamic gain in exceptional-point lasers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IIZA25AC

@misc{pith2026241212066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasinormal coupled-mode analysis of dynamic gain in exceptional-point lasers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IIZA25AC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12066}
}
read the original abstract

One of the key features of lasers operating near exceptional points (EPs) is that the gain medium can support an oscillating population inversion above a pump threshold, leading to self-modulated laser dynamics. This unusual behavior opens up new possibilities for frequency comb generation and temporal modulation. However, the dynamic population inversion couples signals with different frequencies and thus cannot be captured by conventional temporal coupled-mode theory (TCMT) based on static saturable gain. In this paper, we develop a perturbative coupled-mode analysis framework to capture the spatial-temporal dynamics of near-EP lasers. By decomposing discrete frequency generation into multiple excitations of resonant modes, our analysis establishes a minimal physical model that translates the local distribution of dynamic population-inversion into a resonant modal interpretation of laser gain. This work enables the exploration of unique properties in this self-time-modulated systems, such as time-varying scattering and non-reciprocal transmission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12066 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of typical laser models. The rate equation phenomenologically describes the light-matter interaction in time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Validating the Pad´e approximation using a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the frequency comb generation from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of computation results from exact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The left column is the exact result from Green’s func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The error distribution of a Pad´e approximant in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Wang, Y.-H

    H. Wang, Y.-H. Lai, Z. Yuan, M.-G. Suh, and K. Va- hala, Petermann-factor sensitivity limit near an excep- tional point in a brillouin ring laser gyroscope, Nature communications 11, 1610 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and pt symmetry, Nature Physics 14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    D0 (x) E∗ 0 (x) 1 − (1/2)Γ∥ Γ+ − Γ∗ − |E0 (x) |2 , (C8) χ− (x) = (1/2)Γ∥ Γ0 − Γ∗ − D0 (x) E0 (x) 1 − (1/2)Γ∥ Γ+ − Γ∗ − |E0 (x) |2 . (C9) Slightly beyond the first lasing thresholdDth 1 , this nonlin- ear eigenvalue problem of complex ωd has solutions with negative imaginary parts, which means the correspond- ing perturbation would decay exponentially. The...

    work page

  4. [3]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Na- ture materials 18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  5. [4]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  6. [5]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  7. [6]

    A. Li, H. Wei, M. Cotrufo, W. Chen, S. Mann, X. Ni, B. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wang, S. Fan, et al. , Exceptional points and non-hermitian photonics at the nanoscale, Na- ture Nanotechnology 18, 706 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    Lai, Y.-K

    Y.-H. Lai, Y.-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced sagnac ef- fect, Nature 576, 65 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    M. P. Hokmabadi, A. Schumer, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Non-hermitian ring laser gyro- scopes with enhanced sagnac sensitivity, Nature 576, 70 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Wiersig, A

    J. Wiersig, A. Ebersp¨ acher, J.-B. Shim, J.-W. Ryu, S. Shinohara, M. Hentschel, and H. Schome- rus, Nonorthogonal pairs of copropagating optical modes in deformed microdisk cavities, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 84, 023845 (2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Wiersig, S

    J. Wiersig, S. W. Kim, and M. Hentschel, Asymmet- ric scattering and nonorthogonal mode patterns in opti- cal microspirals, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 78, 053809 (2008)

    2008

  4. [11]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Qiao, B. Midya, K. Liu, J. Sun, T. Wu, W. Liu, R. Agarwal, J. M. Jornet, S. Longhi, et al., Tun- able topological charge vortex microlaser, Science 368, 760 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    Peng, S ¸

    B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, 17 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10-3 10-3 10 4 5 10 4 5 10 4 -5 10 4 -5 0 10 4 5 10 4 -5 0 10 4 5 10 4 -5 Re[y] Re[y] Im[y] Im[y] |F(y)| Re[y] Re[y] Im[y] Im[y] 104-5 104-5 10...

    2016

  6. [13]

    C. E. R¨ uter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics, Nature physics 6, 192 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    Zhao and L

    H. Zhao and L. Feng, Parity–time symmetric photonics, National Science Review 5, 183 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Liertzer, L

    M. Liertzer, L. Ge, A. Cerjan, A. D. Stone, H. E. T¨ ureci, and S. Rotter, Pump-induced exceptional points in lasers, Physical Review Letters 108, 173901 (2012)

    2012

  9. [16]

    Peng, S ¸

    B. Peng, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, and L. Yang, Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities, Nature Physics 10, 394 (2014)

    2014

  10. [17]

    Peng, S ¸.¨Ozdemir, S

    B. Peng, S ¸.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Loss- induced suppression and revival of lasing, Science 346, 328 (2014)

    2014

  11. [18]

    Cerjan and S

    A. Cerjan and S. Fan, Eigenvalue dynamics in the pres- ence of nonuniform gain and loss, Physical Review A 94, 033857 (2016)

    2016

  12. [19]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Sci- ence 346, 972 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    Brandstetter, M

    M. Brandstetter, M. Liertzer, C. Deutsch, P. Klang, J. Sch¨ oberl, H. E. T¨ ureci, G. Strasser, K. Unterrainer, and S. Rotter, Reversing the pump dependence of a laser at an exceptional point, Nature communications 5, 4034 (2014)

    2014

  14. [21]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krimer, G. Zhao, F. Nori, Y.-x. Liu, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point, Nature Photonics 12, 479 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time– symmetric microring lasers, Science 346, 975 (2014)

    2014

  16. [23]

    Benzaouia, A

    M. Benzaouia, A. Stone, and S. G. Johnson, Nonlin- ear exceptional-point lasing with ab initio maxwell–bloch theory, APL Photonics 7 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    K. Ji, Q. Zhong, L. Ge, G. Beaudoin, I. Sagnes, F. Raineri, R. El-Ganainy, and A. M. Yacomotti, Track- ing exceptional points above the lasing threshold, Nature Communications 14, 8304 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    X. Gao, H. He, S. Sobolewski, A. Cerjan, and C. W. Hsu, Dynamic gain and frequency comb formation in exceptional-point lasers, Nature Communications 15, 8618 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    L. Ge, Y. D. Chong, and A. D. Stone, Steady-state ab initio laser theory: generalizations and analytic results, Physical Review A 82, 063824 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    H. E. T¨ ureci, A. D. Stone, and B. Collier, Self-consistent 18 2% 4% 6% 6% 8% 8% 10% 10% 20% 40% 80% -5 104 0 5 104 Re[y] -5 104 0 5 104 Im[y] 0 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FIG. 8. The error distribution of a Pad´ e approximant inF (y) evaluation on the complex y plane. The error is...

    2006

  21. [29]

    L. Ge, R. J. Tandy, A. D. Stone, and H. E. T¨ ureci, Quan- titative verification of ab initio self-consistent laser the- ory, Optics Express 16, 16895 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Esterhazy, D

    S. Esterhazy, D. Liu, M. Liertzer, A. Cerjan, L. Ge, K. Makris, A. D. Stone, J. M. Melenk, S. G. Johnson, and S. Rotter, Scalable numerical approach for the steady- state ab initio laser theory, Physical Review A90, 023816 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Lalanne, W

    P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J.-P. Hugonin, Light interaction with photonic and plasmonic resonances, Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700113 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University science books, 1986)

    1986

  25. [33]

    Zhang and O

    H. Zhang and O. D. Miller, Quasinormal coupled mode theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08650 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Sauvan, T

    C. Sauvan, T. Wu, R. Zarouf, E. A. Muljarov, and P. Lalanne, Normalization, orthogonality, and complete- ness of quasinormal modes of open systems: the case of electromagnetism, Optics Express 30, 6846 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Alpeggiani, N

    F. Alpeggiani, N. Parappurath, E. Verhagen, and L. Kuipers, Quasinormal-mode expansion of the scatter- ing matrix, Physical Review X 7, 021035 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Binkowski, F

    F. Binkowski, F. Betz, R. Colom, M. Hammerschmidt, L. Zschiedrich, and S. Burger, Quasinormal mode ex- pansion of optical far-field quantities, Physical Review B 102, 035432 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    K. Bai, L. Fang, T.-R. Liu, J.-Z. Li, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Nonlinearity-enabled higher-order exceptional singulari- ties with ultra-enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, National Science Review 10, nwac259 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Assawaworrarit, X

    S. Assawaworrarit, X. Yu, and S. Fan, Robust wireless power transfer using a nonlinear parity–time-symmetric circuit, Nature 546, 387 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation, Nature photonics 6, 782 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Bai, T.-R

    K. Bai, T.-R. Liu, L. Fang, J.-Z. Li, C. Lin, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Observation of nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics, Physical Review Let- ters 132, 073802 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    D. L. Sounas and A. Al` u, Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation, Nature Photonics 11, 774 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time-varying media, Advanced Photonics 4, 014002 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Leung, S

    P. Leung, S. Liu, and K. Young, Completeness and or- thogonality of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavi- ties, Physical Review A 49, 3057 (1994)

    1994

  36. [44]

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, Synthetic dimen- sion in photonics, Optica 5, 1396 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, 1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Lee, Decaying and growing eigenmodes in open quantum systems: Biorthogonality and the petermann factor, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Op- tical Physics 80, 042104 (2009)

    S.-Y. Lee, Decaying and growing eigenmodes in open quantum systems: Biorthogonality and the petermann factor, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Op- tical Physics 80, 042104 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Sauvan, J.-P

    C. Sauvan, J.-P. Hugonin, I. S. Maksymov, and P. Lalanne, Theory of the spontaneous optical emission of nanosize photonic and plasmon resonators, Physical Review Letters 110, 237401 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    J. Ren, S. Franke, and S. Hughes, Quasinormal modes, lo- cal density of states, and classical purcell factors for cou- pled loss-gain resonators, Physical Review X 11, 041020 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein, Exact mode volume and purcell factor of open optical systems, Physical Re- view B 94, 235438 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    E. A. Muljarov, W. Langbein, and R. Zimmermann, Brillouin-wigner perturbation theory in open electromag- netic systems, Europhysics Letters 92, 50010 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Ge and S

    R.-C. Ge and S. Hughes, Design of an efficient single photon source from a metallic nanorod dimer: a quasi- normal mode finite-difference time-domain approach, Optics Letters 39, 4235 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    P. T. Kristensen, R.-C. Ge, and S. Hughes, Normalization of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities and plas- monic resonators, Physical Review A 92, 053810 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    ˜En (x) d2 ˜Em (x) dx2 + ˜ω2 m c2 εr (x) ˜En (x) ˜Em (x) # dx = 0. (A2) Integrating by parts, Eq. (A2) can be written as

    and the openness [32] of this resonator system, re- spectively. The inner product in Eq. (2) is provably unique for arbitrary choice of boundary x1,2 in the sur- rounding free space and satisfies the orthogonality rela- tion ⟨ ˜En | ˜Em⟩ = δn,m, where δn,m is the Kronecker del...

    2000

  46. [54]

    Zschiedrich, F

    L. Zschiedrich, F. Binkowski, N. Nikolay, O. Benson, G. Kewes, and S. Burger, Riesz-projection-based theory of light-matter interaction in dispersive nanoresonators, Physical Review A 98, 043806 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    M. M. Sternheim and J. F. Walker, Non-hermitian hamil- tonians, decaying states, and perturbation theory, Phys- ical Review C 6, 114 (1972)

    1972

  48. [56]

    Gigli, T

    C. Gigli, T. Wu, G. Marino, A. Borne, G. Leo, and P. Lalanne, Quasinormal-mode non-hermitian modeling and design in nonlinear nano-optics, ACS photonics 7, 1197 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light (Second Edition) , 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, 2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    W. Suh, Z. Wang, and S. Fan, Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in loss- less multimode cavities, IEEE Journal of Quantum Elec- 19 tronics 40, 1511 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    S. Fan, W. Suh, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Temporal coupled-mode theory for the fano resonance in optical resonators, JOSA A 20, 569 (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    Cerjan, Y

    A. Cerjan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, and A. D. Stone, Steady- state ab initio laser theory for n-level lasers, Optics ex- press 20, 474 (2011)

    2011

  53. [61]

    Cerjan, A

    A. Cerjan, A. Oskooi, S.-L. Chua, and S. G. Johnson, Modeling lasers and saturable absorbers via multilevel atomic media in the meep fdtd software: Theory and im- plementation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09329 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    L. Ge, O. Malik, and H. E. T¨ ureci, Enhancement of laser power-efficiency by control of spatial hole burning inter- actions, Nature Photonics 8, 871 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    G. A. Baker Jr and J. L. Gammel, The pad´ e approximant, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2, 21 (1961)

    1961

  56. [64]

    G. A. Baker Jr, The theory and application of the Pad´ e approximant method, Tech. Rep. (Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 1964)

    1964

  57. [65]

    Rodriguez, M

    A. Rodriguez, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. G. Johnson, χ (2) and χ (3) harmonic generation at a critical power in inhomogeneous doubly resonant cavities, Optics express 15, 7303 (2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    I. B. Burgess, A. W. Rodriguez, M. W. McCutcheon, J. Bravo-Abad, Y. Zhang, S. G. Johnson, and M. Lonˇ car, Difference-frequency generation with quantum-limited efficiency in triply-resonant nonlinear cavities, Optics ex- press 17, 9241 (2009)

    2009

  59. [67]

    H. Wang, S. Assawaworrarit, and S. Fan, Dynamics for encircling an exceptional point in a nonlinear non- hermitian system, Optics letters 44, 638 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Bai, J.-Z

    K. Bai, J.-Z. Li, T.-R. Liu, L. Fang, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics, Physical Review Letters 130, 266901 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Ramezanpour and A

    S. Ramezanpour and A. Bogdanov, Tuning exceptional points with kerr nonlinearity, Physical Review A 103, 043510 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    A. Pick, Z. Lin, W. Jin, and A. W. Rodriguez, En- hanced nonlinear frequency conversion and purcell en- hancement at exceptional points, Physical Review B 96, 224303 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    W. Yan, R. Faggiani, and P. Lalanne, Rigorous modal analysis of plasmonic nanoresonators, Physical Review B 97, 205422 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    R. W. Boyd, A. L. Gaeta, and E. Giese, Nonlinear optics, in Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Springer, 2008) pp. 1097–1110

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.