On generalized hexagons of order (3, t) and (4, t) containing a subhexagon
classification
🧮 math.CO
keywords
generalizedhexagonsordercontainingequalfullhexagonsemi-finite
read the original abstract
We prove that there are no semi-finite generalized hexagons with $q + 1$ points on each line containing the known generalized hexagons of order $q$ as full subgeometries when $q$ is equal to $3$ or $4$, thus contributing to the existence problem of semi-finite generalized polygons posed by Tits. The case when $q$ is equal to $2$ was treated by us in an earlier work, for which we give an alternate proof. For the split Cayley hexagon of order $4$ we obtain the stronger result that it cannot be contained as a proper full subgeometry in any generalized hexagon.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.