Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Faint Flux-Limited Lyman Alpha Emitter Sample at $z\sim0.3$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.06092 v1 pith:IMDAVW6U submitted 2017-09-18 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords alphaluminositydensitysamplesim0evolutionobservedagns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We present a flux-limited sample of $z\sim0.3$ Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) from Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) grism spectroscopic data. The published GALEX $z\sim0.3$ LAE sample is pre-selected from continuum-bright objects and thus is biased against high equivalent width (EW) LAEs. We remove this continuum pre-selection and compute the EW distribution and the luminosity function of the Ly$\alpha$ emission line directly from our sample. We examine the evolution of these quantities from $z\sim0.3$ to $2.2$ and find that the EW distribution shows little evidence for evolution over this redshift range. As shown by previous studies, the Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density from star-forming galaxies declines rapidly with declining redshift. However, we find that the decline in Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density from $z=2.2$ to $z=0.3$ may simply mirror the decline seen in the H$\alpha$ luminosity density from $z=2.2$ to $z=0.4$, implying little change in the volumetric Ly$\alpha$ escape fraction. Finally, we show that the observed Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density from AGNs is comparable to the observed Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density from star-forming galaxies at $z=0.3$. We suggest that this significant contribution from AGNs to the total observed Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density persists out to $z\sim2.2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools