Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on "Negative Refractive Index in Artificial Metamaterials" [A. N. Grigorenko, Opt. Lett., 31, 2483 (2006)]

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0609234 v1 pith:IN325CYC submitted 2006-09-26 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords grigorenkoindexnegativerefractiveeffectivethicknesscompositelayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A key optical parameter characterizing the existence of negative refraction in a thin layer of a composite material is the effective refractive index of an equivalent, homogenized layer with the same physical thickness as the initial inhomogeneous composite. Measuring the complex transmission and reflection coefficients is one of the most rigorous ways to obtain this parameter. We dispute Grigorenko's statement (Optics Letters 31, 2483 (2006)) that measuring only the reflection intensity spectrum is sufficient for determining the effective refractive index. We discuss fundamental drawbacks of Grigorenko's technique of using a best-fit approximation with an a priori prescribed dispersive behavior for a given metamaterial and an 'effective optical thickness' that is smaller than the actual thickness of the sample. Our simulations do not confirm the Grigorenko paper conclusions regarding the negative refractive index and the negative permeability of the nanopillar sample in the visible spectral range.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools