REVIEW
Comment on "Negative Refractive Index in Artificial Metamaterials" [A. N. Grigorenko, Opt. Lett., 31, 2483 (2006)]
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A key optical parameter characterizing the existence of negative refraction in a thin layer of a composite material is the effective refractive index of an equivalent, homogenized layer with the same physical thickness as the initial inhomogeneous composite. Measuring the complex transmission and reflection coefficients is one of the most rigorous ways to obtain this parameter. We dispute Grigorenko's statement (Optics Letters 31, 2483 (2006)) that measuring only the reflection intensity spectrum is sufficient for determining the effective refractive index. We discuss fundamental drawbacks of Grigorenko's technique of using a best-fit approximation with an a priori prescribed dispersive behavior for a given metamaterial and an 'effective optical thickness' that is smaller than the actual thickness of the sample. Our simulations do not confirm the Grigorenko paper conclusions regarding the negative refractive index and the negative permeability of the nanopillar sample in the visible spectral range.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.