Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 36 references

Collinear spin density wave state in distorted square-lattice GdNiSn$_4$

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read GdNiSn4 orders as a single-q, collinear spin density wave with moments pinned along the in-plane a-axis, according to resonant x-ray scattering.

desk verdict Solid first magnetic structure determination for a new square-net intermetallic, but the single-q/phase-separation claim is the soft spot and needs stronger support than an absent sum peak. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.08524 v1 pith:IPCMZ7CF submitted 2026-03-09 cond-mat.str-el

Charles C. Tam , Sarah Schwarz , Xin Zhang , Sudipta Chatterjee , Scott B. Lee , Rebecca Scatena , Leslie M. Schoop , Stephen D. Wilson This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.25.-j75.30.Fv78.70.Ck
keywords spindensitywaveresonantx-rayscatteringGdNiSn4collinearorderincommensuratemagneticsquare-netmagnetlanthanideintermetallicstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the ground-state magnetic order of the newly synthesized intermetallic GdNiSn4, which forms distorted square nets of Gd. Using resonant elastic x-ray scattering, the authors establish that the zero-field order is a single-q, incommensurate, collinear spin density wave with Gd moments parallel to the in-plane a-axis. They identify two magnetic transitions at about 23 K and 16 K, and show that the interlayer modulation wavevector slides with temperature, coexisting in an intermediate phase-separated regime. The result matters because it provides a zero-field magnetic symmetry picture for a square-net lanthanide compound, a family being explored for topological spin textures and unconventional Hall responses.

What carries the argument

Resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS) at the Gd L2 edge is the central probe: it enhances signal from Gd moments and, through the polarization and azimuthal dependence of scattered intensity, allows the moment direction to be pinned down. Magnetic symmetry analysis assigns the order to the mB2 irreducible representation, and a collinear incommensurate order in a centrosymmetric crystal must be a moment-modulated SDW rather than a constant-amplitude helix. Standard resonant scattering expressions are used to fit the azimuthal dependence, yielding moments parallel to a within error.

What would settle it

A resonant x-ray search with extended counting at the predicted sum and difference wavevectors Q1+Q2=(1.12,2,20.40) and Q1-Q2=(0,0,0.04), deep in the phase-coexistence regime, would settle whether a multi-q state exists; detection of either satellite would falsify the single-q/phase-separation claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that GdNiSn4's ground state is a moment-modulated spin density wave, not a simple collinear antiferromagnet or a multi-q texture. The modulation is incommensurate with wavevector q=(0.06,0,0.22) at low temperature, and the magnetic moments lie in the Gd square-net plane, along the a-axis, with no resolvable component along c. A second wavevector, closer to the commensurate L=1/4 position, appears at higher temperature and coexists with the first across a phase-separated window, with the two magnetic transitions near 23 K and 13-16 K. The evidence comes from the resonant energy profile, polarization rotation by 90 degrees, the azimuthal dependence of scattering intensity,

Load-bearing premise

The single-q/phase-separation narrative depends on the absence of a Q1+Q2 combination peak; if that peak is merely below the detection limit of the resonant scattering measurement, the two wavevectors could instead belong to a single multi-q magnetic structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The zero-field ground state of GdNiSn4 is a single-q collinear SDW, so any noncoplanar or skyrmionic order in this compound must be field-induced rather than intrinsic to the zero-field state.
  • The interlayer wavevector slides with temperature and moves away from commensurability on cooling, indicating that the 16 K transition is first-order and that the two phases compete.
  • The coexistence of Q1 and Q2 with distinct temperature dependences and no sum peak is interpreted as phase separation, precluding a multi-q single-phase structure.
  • Both magnetic transitions produce anomalies in resistivity and specific heat, supporting an itinerant, Fermi-surface-nesting-driven origin for the SDW.
  • The strong monoclinic distortion of the Gd square nets pins a single in-plane propagation direction, distinguishing this system from higher-symmetry square-lattice compounds that host multiple-q spin textures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In a field-dependent resonant x-ray experiment, the two coexisting harmonics should respond differently: if they are separate phases, one will be suppressed or switched by modest in-plane fields; if they are a multi-q state, their relative intensities will lock together.
  • If the SDW is truly moment-modulated, an elastic neutron or muon experiment should find no static constant moment at the Gd sites; instead, the modulation amplitude itself must be observed.
  • Because the in-plane wavevector remains fixed while only the interlayer component slides, a minimal two-parameter model of interlayer exchange — one coupling favoring the T_AF2 period and another the T_AF1 period — could reproduce the phase coexistence without invoking magnetic anisotropy changes.
  • The comparison with EuAl4 and EuGa2Al2 suggests a design rule for engineering topological spin textures in square-net lanthanides: only weak symmetry-breaking distortions allow multiple-q states, so alloying GdNiSn4 toward a less distorted lattice could restore multi-q order and a topological Hall effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper reports a resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS) study of the newly synthesized intermetallic GdNiSn4, a monoclinic compound with distorted square nets of Gd. The authors identify an incommensurate magnetic peak at Q = (0.56, 1, 10.22) corresponding to q = (0.06, 0, 0.22), with a second peak at Q2 = (0.56, 1, 10.18) emerging at low temperature. They characterize the temperature evolution of both peaks and, from polarization analysis, circular dichroism, azimuthal scans, and symmetry analysis, conclude that the ground state is a single-q, collinear, moment-modulated spin density wave with Gd moments along the a-axis. They further interpret the coexistence of Q1 and Q2 as phase separation across a first-order transition, and note a temperature-dependent sliding of the interlayer modulation toward a commensurate value. The paper also reports bulk susceptibility, resistivity, and specific heat data showing transitions near 25 K and 16 K.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, this work provides the first magnetic structure determination for GdNiSn4, an important new square-net lanthanide intermetallic, and establishes a zero-field baseline for studying whether field-induced topological spin textures can emerge in this family. The experimental core is strong: the resonant energy dependence, the clear σ→π' polarization rotation, the azimuthal dependence with fits, and the two-peak temperature evolution are mutually consistent measurements that point to collinear incommensurate order. I do not see a circularity problem: the magnetic structure is derived from the scattering data using standard REXS expressions rather than by reusing the conclusion. However, the paper's central 'single-q / phase separation' claim rests on negative evidence, and the magnetic symmetry analysis is deferred to the Supplemental Material; both areas need strengthening before the claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV (phase separation vs. multi-q)] The exclusion of a multi-q coherent state rests on the single sentence 'there are no peaks at Q1+Q2.' This is negative evidence, and no detection limit or search range is reported. Higher-order combination peaks in REXS can be weak, symmetry-forbidden, or suppressed by the resonant scattering tensor, so their absence does not uniquely rule out a coherent superposition of the two modulations. The distinct temperature dependences in Fig. 3(b) are also compatible with two coupled order parameters in a multi-q state. Because the 'single-q' label in the abstract and the 'phase separation' narrative in the conclusions are load-bearing, please provide (i) an explicit search around Q1±Q2, 2Q1, and 2Q2 with intensity upper limits, (ii) a comparison of fits to a two-phase model versus a coherent two-modulation model, or (iii) a spatial test using the reported small beam/raster capability to show t
  2. [Section III / IV (symmetry analysis and azimuthal fit)] The conclusion that the structure is a moment-modulated SDW in the mB2 irrep is stated to follow from magnetic symmetry analysis deferred to the Supplemental Material, and the azimuthal model is described only by a reference to Hill and McMorrow with 'absorption due to resonance' not specified. The central determination of the moment direction (φ = 99.9° ± 1.5° and 103.5° ± 2.1°, leading to m∥a) depends on this model. Please present the symmetry analysis in the main text or SI, including the irreducible representation decomposition, and give the explicit azimuthal intensity formula, how absorption is parameterized, all free parameters, and fit residuals/confidence intervals. This is needed to verify the distinction between a moment-modulated SDW and other collinear configurations.
  3. [Section III (temperature evolution and q-sliding)] The deduction of q-sliding and the first-order coexistence regime relies on fitted peak centers and intensities, but no uncertainties or fit criteria are reported. In Fig. 3(b,c), hollow markers denote fitted values deemed unreliable when intensity is too low, yet the extrapolation of Q1 to δ ≈ 0.18 at T = 0 and the 'sliding' narrative use these temperature trends. Please report the fit function, the integration/background subtraction procedure, the low-intensity cutoff, and full error bars, and show that the q-sliding conclusions are robust to excluding questionable points. In addition, the ~3 K offset between the x-ray and bulk transition temperatures is attributed to beam heating without calibration; this should be quantified or explicitly labeled as an unverified systematic uncertainty.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section II / throughout] The space group is written as C/2m; the standard symbol is C2/m. Typos: 'Wykoff' should be 'Wyckoff'; 'fairy consistent' should be 'fairly consistent'; 'T emperature' in Fig. 3 caption; 'he cant angle' in Fig. 4 caption; 'Polariztaion' in Ref. [23] title.
  2. [Section III / Fig. 2] The text refers to 'In Figure 1c, a fixed-Q energy scan' and 'Figure 1f' for the L-dependence; these appear to be Figures 2(b) and 2(f). Please correct the cross-references.
  3. [Section III / Fig. 3] The text states Q2 = (0.56, 1, 10.24) at 20 K, whereas at 7.5 K Q2 = (0.56, 1, 10.18). This is consistent with the temperature-dependent sliding, but the difference should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [Section III / IV] The paper acknowledges that the magnitude of the ordered moment cannot be determined. This is an important limitation; it should be stated in the abstract or conclusions so readers do not infer a measured moment amplitude.
  5. [Section IV] The 'mB2 irrep' is not introduced in the main text. Please define it when the symmetry analysis is presented (see major comment 2).
  6. [Section III / Fig. 4] The sentence 'The azimuthal value where the intensity is maximized is, to first order, the moment direction' is an oversimplification; the subsequent least-squares fit is the rigorous determination and should be presented as such.
  7. [Section IV] The final statement that both transitions are 'likely driven via Fermi surface nesting effects' is speculative; consider softening this claim unless supported by electronic-structure calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnetic structure follows from direct REXS observables and standard scattering cross-sections, with no fitted quantity reused as its own prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained as a scattering-data analysis. The magnetic propagation vector Q=(0.56,1,10.22) is read directly from diffraction peak positions; the magnetic character is established by the resonance profile and the σ→π' polarization rotation (Fig. 2b,c); collinearity is inferred from the absence of circular-dichroic contrast between CL and CR in azimuthal scans (Fig. 4b,c); and the moment direction is obtained by least-squares fitting the measured azimuthal intensity to the standard Hill-McMorrow REXS cross-section with moments constrained to the (a,c) plane. The fit yields φ≈99.9° and φ≈103.5°, compared to the monoclinic angle β=98.77°, from which the conclusion m∥a follows. No fitted parameter is recycled as a target prediction. The 'moment-modulated SDW' classification is delegated to the paper's own SI symmetry analysis, but that is a parameter-free group-theoretical statement of the kind that constitutes independent support rather than a circular assumption; the same holds for the crystal-structure and twinning input coming from the separately reported companion paper [20]. The only interpretive step that is not airtight—the exclusion of a multi-q state via the absence of a Q1+Q2 peak—is an evidential inference, not a circular reduction: it does not assume the conclusion it is used to prove. No self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing, or ansatz-smuggling step is present, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new microscopic entities are introduced. The central result relies on standard REXS theory, the companion paper's structural model, and a symmetry argument that is not shown in the main text. The one fitted free parameter is the moment cant angle, which directly produces the claim that moments lie along a.

free parameters (1)
  • cant angle φ of Gd moments from c-axis = φ1 = 99.9° ± 1.5° at 7.5 K; φ2 = 103.5° ± 2.1° at 20 K
    Fit to azimuthal REXS intensity using Hill-McMorrow expressions after constraining moments to the (a,c) plane; the conclusion m∥a rests on this fitted value matching the monoclinic angle β = 98.77°.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Resonant x-ray scattering expressions of Hill and McMorrow [23] correctly model the azimuthal and polarization dependence measured here.
    Standard theory used without derivation; if absorption corrections or geometry modeling are wrong, the extracted cant angle and moment orientation would shift.
  • domain assumption A collinear incommensurate magnetic structure is necessarily a moment-modulated spin density wave.
    Invoked in Section III ('magnetic symmetry analysis dictates') and deferred to SI [22]; assumes no hidden higher harmonics or squared-up moment structure.
  • ad hoc to paper The ~3 K offset between x-ray and bulk transition temperatures is caused by local beam heating.
    Proposed in Section III without independent thermal calibration; if incorrect, the assignment of T_AF1/T_AF2 from x-ray data is off by 3 K.
  • domain assumption Crystal structure, lattice parameters, and twinning model are correctly taken from the authors' companion synthesis paper [20].
    All structural input (C/2m, a=8.74 Å, b=8.82 Å, c=14.33 Å, β=98.77°, twin ratio 57.1/42.9) comes from Ref. [20]; no independent refinement is performed here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collinear spin density wave state in distorted square-lattice GdNiSn$_4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IPCMZ7CF

@misc{pith2026260308524,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collinear spin density wave state in distorted square-lattice GdNiSn$_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IPCMZ7CF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.08524}
}
abstract

We characterize the magnetic ground state of the newly synthesized lanthanide intermetallic GdNiSn$_4$ via resonant elastic x-ray scattering measurements. This compound forms distorted square nets of Gd that initially order magnetically below 23 K followed by a lower temperature transition at 16 K. Our scattering data identify the ground state order as a single-$q$ incommensurate, collinear order that slides towards a commensurate wave vector above the 16 K transition. Magnetic symmetry analysis combined with azimuthal dependence resolves the ground state magnetic structure as a moment-modulated spin density wave state with Gd moments oriented parallel to the in-plane a-axis. We discuss connections between the observed magnetic order and electronic properties in this square-net compound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08524 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨ oni, Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science323, 915 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Real-space ob- servation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature 465, 901 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Kanazawa, Magnetic skyrmion mate- rials, Chemical Reviews121, 2857 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Ozawa, S

    R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, and Y. Motome, Zero-field skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets, Physical Review Letters118, 147205 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Hayami, R

    S. Hayami, R. Ozawa, and Y. Motome, Effective bilinear- biquadratic model for noncoplanar ordering in itinerant magnets, Physical Review B95, 224424 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Z. Wang, Y. Su, S.-Z. Lin, and C. D. Batista, Skyrmion crystal from RKKY interaction mediated by 2D electron gas, Physical Review Letters124, 207201 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Kurumaji, T

    T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet, Science365, 914 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Hirschberger, L

    M. Hirschberger, L. Spitz, T. Nomoto, T. Kurumaji, S. Gao, J. Masell, T. Nakajima, A. Kikkawa, Y. Ya- masaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, R. Arita, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Topological Nernst effect of the two-dimensional skyrmion lattice, Physical Review Letters125, 076602 (2020)

    2020

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Hirschberger, T

    M. Hirschberger, T. Nakajima, S. Gao, L. Peng, A. Kikkawa, T. Kurumaji, M. Kriener, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, K. Kakurai, Y. Taguchi, X. Yu, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic orders on a breathing kagome lattice, Nature Comm...

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Nakamura, T

    A. Nakamura, T. Uejo, F. Honda, T. Takeuchi, H. Harima, E. Yamamoto, Y. Haga, K. Matsubayashi, Y. Uwatoko, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, and Y. ¯Onuki, Trans- port and magnetic properties of EuAl4 and EuGa4, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan84, 124711 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Kaneko, T

    K. Kaneko, T. Kawasaki, A. Nakamura, K. Munakata, A. Nakao, T. Hanashima, R. Kiyanagi, T. Ohhara, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, and Y. ¯Onuki, Charge-density- wave order and multiple magnetic transitions in divalent europium compound EuAl 4, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan90,...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Takagi, N

    R. Takagi, N. Matsuyama, V. Ukleev, L. Yu, J. S. White, S. Francoual, J. R. L. Mardegan, S. Hayami, H. Saito, K. Kaneko, K. Ohishi, Y. ¯Onuki, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary com- p...

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    J. M. Moya, S. Lei, E. M. Clements, C. S. Kengle, S. Sun, K. Allen, Q. Li, Y. Y. Peng, A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. J. Krogstad, R. Osborn, A. B. Puthirath, S. Chi, L. Debeer-Schmitt, J. Gaudet, P. Abbamonte, J. W. Lynn, and E. Morosan, Incommensurate magnetic orders and topol...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Garnier, D

    A. Garnier, D. Gignoux, N. Iwata, D. Schmitt, T. Shi- geoka, and F. Zhang, Anisotropic metamagnetism in GdRu2Si2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials140–144, 899 (1995)

    1995

  7. [15]

    Yasui, C

    Y. Yasui, C. J. Butler, N. D. Khanh, S. Hayami, T. Nomoto, T. Hanaguri, Y. Motome, R. Arita, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura, and S. Seki, Imaging the coupling between itinerant electrons and localised moments in the centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet GdRu 2Si2, Na- ture Communications11,...

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shi- bata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Peng, K. Nakajima, R. Takagi, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura, and S. Seki, Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet, Nature Nanotechnology15,...

    2020

  9. [17]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, S. Hayami, S. Gao, Y. Ya- masaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, R. Takagi, Y. Mo- 6 tome, Y. Tokura, T. Arima, and S. Seki, Zoology of multiple-Qspin textures in a centrosymmetric tetrago- nal magnet with itinerant electrons, Advanced Science 9, 10.1002/advs...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Garnier, D

    A. Garnier, D. Gignoux, D. Schmitt, and T. Shigeoka, Giant magnetic anisotropy in tetragonal GdRu 2Ge2 and GdRu2Si2, Physica B: Condensed Matter222, 80 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    Yoshimochi, R

    H. Yoshimochi, R. Takagi, J. Ju, N. D. Khanh, H. Saito, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, S. Itoh, Y. Tokura, T. Arima, S. Hayami, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Multistep topo- logical transitions among meron and skyrmion crystals in a centrosymmetric magnet, Nature Physics20, 1001 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Zhang, S

    X. Zhang, S. B. Lee, S. Chatterjee, H. Pi, Y. Yang, F. Katmer, E. G. Ward, D. E. Widdowson, C. C. Tam, S. Schwarz, C. J. Pollak, J. M. Moya, G. Skorupskii, V. A. Kurlin, S. D. Wilson, B. A. Bernevig, and L. M. Schoop, Identification of an unreported structure type in GdNiSn4 a...

    2026 arXiv

  13. [21]

    S. P. Collins, A. Bombardi, A. R. Marshall, J. H. Williams, G. Barlow, A. G. Day, M. R. Pearson, R. J. Woolliscroft, R. D. Walton, G. Beutier, G. Nisbet, R. Garrett, I. Gentle, K. Nugent, and S. Wilkins, Di- amond beamline I16 (materials & magnetism), inAIP Conference Proceedi...

    2010

  14. [22]

    Supplemental information

  15. [23]

    J. P. Hill and D. F. McMorrow, X-ray resonant ex- change scattering: Polariztaion dependence and corre- lation function, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foun- dations of Crystallography52, 236 (1996)

    1996

  16. [24]

    Porter, G

    Z. Porter, G. Pokharel, J.-W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, and S. D. Wilson, Incommensurate magnetic order in theZ 2 kagome metal GdV6Sn6, Physical Review B108, 035134 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Granado, P

    E. Granado, P. G. Pagliuso, C. Giles, R. Lora-Serrano, F. Yokaichiya, and J. L. Sarrao, Magnetic structure and fluctuations of Gd 2IrIn8: A resonant x-ray diffraction study, Physical Review B69, 144411 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Granado, B

    E. Granado, B. Uchoa, A. Malachias, R. Lora-Serrano, P. G. Pagliuso, and H. Westfahl, Magnetic structure and critical behavior of GdRhIn 5: Resonant x-ray diffraction and renormalization group analysis, Physical Review B 74, 214428 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    S. A. Granovsky, A. Kreyssig, M. Doerr, C. Ritter, E. Dudzik, R. Feyerherm, P. C. Canfield, and M. Loewen- haupt, The magnetic order of GdMn2Ge2 studied by neu- tron diffraction and x-ray resonant magnetic scattering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 226005 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Detlefs, A

    C. Detlefs, A. I. Goldman, C. Stassis, P. C. Canfield, B. K. Cho, J. P. Hill, and D. Gibbs, Magnetic structure of GdNi2B2C by resonant and nonresonant x-ray scattering, Physical Review B53, 6355 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    A. M. Vibhakar, D. D. Khalyavin, F. Orlandi, J. M. Moya, S. Lei, E. Morosan, and A. Bombardi, Sponta- neous reversal of spin chirality and competing phases in the topological magnet EuAl 4, Communications Physics 7, 10.1038/s42005-024-01802-7 (2024)

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Ramakrishnan, S

    S. Ramakrishnan, S. R. Kotla, T. Rekis, J.-K. Bao, C. Eisele, L. Noohinejad, M. Tolkiehn, C. Paul- mann, B. Singh, R. Verma, B. Bag, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, B. Singh, S. Ramakrishnan, and S. van Smaalen, Orthorhombic charge density wave on the tetragonal lattice of EuAl 4...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Kawasaki, K

    T. Kawasaki, K. Kaneko, A. Nakamura, N. Aso, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, T. Ohhara, R. Kiyanagi, K. Oikawa, I. Tamura, A. Nakao, K. Munakata, T. Hanashima, and Y. ¯Onuki, Magnetic structure of divalent europium com- pound EuGa4 studied by single-crystal time-of-flight neu- tron diffra...

    2016

  24. [32]

    Stavinoha, J

    M. Stavinoha, J. A. Cooley, S. G. Minasian, T. M. Mc- Queen, S. M. Kauzlarich, C.-L. Huang, and E. Morosan, Charge density wave behavior and order-disorder in the antiferromagnetic metallic series Eu(Ga 1−xAlx)4, Physi- cal Review B97, 195146 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    A. M. Vibhakar, D. D. Khalyavin, J. M. Moya, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, S. Lei, E. Morosan, and A. Bom- bardi, Competing charge and magnetic order in the can- didate centrosymmetric skyrmion host EuGa 2Al2, Phys- ical Review B108, l100404 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    M. T. Littlehales, S. H. Moody, P. J. Bereciartua, D. A. Mayoh, Z. B. Parkin, T. J. Blundell, E. Unsworth, S. Francoual, G. Balakrishnan, D. A. Venero, and P. D. Hatton, Spin density waves and ground state helices in EuGa 2.4Al1.6, Physical Review Research6, l032015 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Hayami, Orthorhombic distortion and rectangular skyrmion crystal in a centrosymmetric tetragonal host, Journal of Physics: Materials6, 014006 (2022)

    S. Hayami, Orthorhombic distortion and rectangular skyrmion crystal in a centrosymmetric tetragonal host, Journal of Physics: Materials6, 014006 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    M. Gen, R. Takagi, Y. Watanabe, S. Kitou, H. Sagayama, N. Matsuyama, Y. Kohama, A. Ikeda, Y. ¯Onuki, T. Ku- rumaji, T.-h. Arima, and S. Seki, Rhombic skyrmion lat- tice coupled with orthorhombic structural distortion in EuAl4, Physical Review B107, l020410 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.