REVIEW 1 cited by
Analytical Approach to Parallel Repetition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We propose an analytical framework for studying parallel repetition, a basic product operation for one-round two-player games. In this framework, we consider a relaxation of the value of a game, $\mathrm{val}_+$, and prove that for projection games, it is both multiplicative (under parallel repetition) and a good approximation for the true value. These two properties imply a parallel repetition bound as $$ \mathrm{val}(G^{\otimes k}) \approx \mathrm{val}_+(G^{\otimes k}) = \mathrm{val}_+(G)^{k} \approx \mathrm{val}(G)^{k}. $$ Using this framework, we can also give a short proof for the NP-hardness of Label-Cover$(1,\delta)$ for all $\delta>0$, starting from the basic PCP theorem. We prove the following new results: - A parallel repetition bound for projection games with small soundness. Previously, it was not known whether parallel repetition decreases the value of such games. This result implies stronger inapproximability bounds for Set-Cover and Label-Cover. - An improved bound for few parallel repetitions of projection games, showing that Raz's counterexample is tight even for a small number of repetitions. Our techniques also allow us to bound the value of the direct product of multiple games, namely, a bound on $\mathrm{val}(G_1\otimes ...\otimes G_k)$ for different projection games $G_1,...,G_k$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fixed Budget vs. Covering Target: The Partial Set Cover Boundary for Bounded VC-Dimension
Partial Set Cover is inapproximable below factor 2 even at VC-dimension 7, while bounded semi-ladder index restores a k+1-sets covering target and yields new EPAS results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.