Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cover times, blanket times, and majorizing measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1004.4371 v5 pith:IPWP6AJN submitted 2010-04-25 math.PR cs.DSmath.MG

classification math.PRcs.DSmath.MG
keywords covertimesblanketfactorgraphtimegaussiangraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We exhibit a strong connection between cover times of graphs, Gaussian processes, and Talagrand's theory of majorizing measures. In particular, we show that the cover time of any graph $G$ is equivalent, up to universal constants, to the square of the expected maximum of the Gaussian free field on $G$, scaled by the number of edges in $G$. This allows us to resolve a number of open questions. We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that computes the cover time to within an O(1) factor for any graph, answering a question of Aldous and Fill (1994). We also positively resolve the blanket time conjectures of Winkler and Zuckerman (1996), showing that for any graph, the blanket and cover times are within an O(1) factor. The best previous approximation factor for both these problems was $O((\log \log n)^2)$ for $n$-vertex graphs, due to Kahn, Kim, Lovasz, and Vu (2000).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Meeting and coalescence times for random walks in the largest component of the Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Expected meeting, coalescence, and voter-consensus times on the Erdős–Rényi giant are Θ(n) throughout the fixed-supercritical, slightly-supercritical, and critical regimes.

Pith tools